Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Promotion”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources

Localization of a second SigH promoter in the Bacillus subtilis sigA operon and regulation of dnaE expression by the promoter.

The presence of a second SigH promoter in the sigA operon of Bacillus subtilis was demonstrated by use of a promoter probe plasmid, a sigH deletion mutant, primer extension studies, and in vitro transcription with E sigma H holoenzyme. Both SigH promoters were expressed at low levels even during the growth phase but were expressed at higher levels during the early stationary phase. Expression from the upstream SigH promoter allowed the expression of both dnaE and sigA genes; however, expression from the downstream SigH promoter, which was located in the ribosome-binding site of the dnaE gene, resulted only in the expression of the sigA gene, since the truncated dnaE ribosome-binding site could not be used for initiating translation. Thus, promoter switching during the early stationary phase resulted not only in expression from SigH promoters but also in differential expression of the genes in the sigA operon.

Bacillus subtilis↗

Mutations in the -10 TATAAT sequence of the gyrA promoter affect both promoter strength and sensitivity to DNA supercoiling.

Transcription of the gyrA and gyrB genes, which encode the subunits of DNA gyrase, increases in response to DNA relaxation. Previous studies have shown that a small segment of DNA extending from the -10 consensus hexamer to the start of transcription encodes the sequence determinants for this response. In this study, we examined the role of the -10 region in relaxation-stimulated transcription (RST). A synthetic derivative of the gyrA promoter was designed to allow the modular replacement of the -10 region, and mixed-oligonucleotide mutagenesis was used to obtain a collection of promoter mutants. Most substitutions result in a reduction of the promoter's RST response, and some mutations abolish it altogether. We also note that a variety of promoter changes can increase basal expression twofold above that seen for the gyrA promoter, despite sequences changes (up to three bases) which diverge from the consensus TATAAT of the wild-type gyrA hexamer. The wild-type gyrA promoter, however, is the strongest promoter in this collection on a relaxed DNA template and appears to be repressed on a supercoiled template in vivo. Our results are consistent with a mechanism for RST that involves a step in transcription initiation.

Base Sequence↗

The promoter of the yeast INO4 regulatory gene: a model of the simplest yeast promoter.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the phospholipid biosynthetic genes are transcriptionally regulated in response to inositol and choline. This regulation requires the transcriptional activator proteins Ino4p and Ino2p, which form a heterodimer that binds to the UAS(INO) element. We have previously shown that the promoters of the INO4 and INO2 genes are among the weakest promoters characterized in yeast. Because little is known about the promoters of weakly expressed yeast genes, we report here the analysis of the constitutive INO4 promoter. Promoter deletion constructs scanning 1,000 bp upstream of the INO4 gene identified a small region (-58 to -46) that is absolutely required for expression. S1 nuclease mapping shows that this region contains the transcription start sites for the INO4 gene. An additional element (-114 to -86) modestly enhances INO4 promoter activity (fivefold). Thus, the region required for INO4 transcription is limited to 68 bp. These studies also found that INO4 gene expression is not autoregulated by Ino2p and Ino4p, despite the presence of a putative UAS(INO) element in the INO4 promoter. We further report that the INO4 steady-state transcript levels and Ino4p levels are regulated twofold in response to inositol and choline, suggesting a posttranscriptional mechanism of regulation.

Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins↗

Functional analysis of the true late human cytomegalovirus pp28 upstream promoter: cis-acting elements and viral trans-acting proteins necessary for promoter activation.

As a model for analyzing the regulation of human cytomegalovirus late genes, we investigated the 28-kDa phosphoprotein (pp28) gene region. Transcripts of 1.6 and 1.3 kb were expressed in wild-type human cytomegalovirus-infected cells but not in cells infected with a DNA-negative temperature-sensitive mutant (ts66), indicating that DNA replication is absolutely required for pp28 gene expression. Transient promoter activation studies revealed that the pp28 gene region upstream promoter (pp28US) functioned early when expressed independently of the viral genome. However, the promoter was not efficiently activated by immediate-early (IE) proteins but was activated equally well by both wild-type virus and ts66. Deletion analysis of the pp28US promoter indicated that sequences upstream of the CAP site between -107 and -32 were required for activation of the pp28 promoter. Within that region exist a 10-bp sequence at -90 (AGTGAT CGTG) and its inverted repeat at -32 which positively influence pp28 promoter function. Therefore, in the case of the pp28US promoter, viral proteins interact through discrete sequences to facilitate late gene expression.

Base Sequence↗

EBNA-2 upregulation of Epstein-Barr virus latency promoters and the cellular CD23 promoter utilizes a common targeting intermediate, CBF1.

The EBNA-2 protein is essential for the establishment of a latent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and for B-cell immortalization. EBNA-2 functions as a transcriptional activator that modulates viral latency gene expression as well as the expression of cellular genes, including CD23. We recently demonstrated that EBNA-2 transactivation of the EBV latency C promoter (Cp) is dependent on an interaction with a cellular DNA-binding protein, CBF1, for promoter targeting. To determine whether targeting via CBF1 is a common mechanism for EBNA-2-mediated transactivation, we have examined the requirements for activation of the cellular CD23 promoter. Binding of CBF1 to a 192-bp mapped EBNA-2-responsive region located at position -85 bp to -277 bp upstream of the CD23 promoter was detected in electrophoretic mobility shift assays. The identity of the bound protein as CBF1 was established by showing that the bound complex was competed for by the CBF1 binding site from the EBV Cp, that the bound protein could be supershifted with a bacterially expressed fusion protein' containing amino acids 252 to 425 of EBNA-2 but was unable to interact with a non-CBF1-binding EBNA-2 mutant (WW323SR), and that in UV cross-linking experiments, the Cp CBF1 binding site and the CD23 probe bound proteins of the same size. The requirement for interaction with CBF1 was demonstrated in a transient cotransfection assay in which the multimerized 192-bp CD23 response region was transactivated by wild-type EBNA-2 but not by the WW323SR mutant. Reporter constructions carrying multimerized copies of the 192-bp CD23 response region or multimers of the CBF1 binding site from the CD23 promoter were significantly less responsive to EBNA-2 transactivation than equivalent constructions carrying a multimerized region from the Cp or multimers of the CBF1 binding site from the Cp. Direct binding and competition assays using 30-mer oligonucleotide probes representing the individual CBF1 binding sites indicated that CBF1 bound less efficiently to the CD23 promoter and the EBV LMP-1 promoter sites than to the Cp site. To investigate the basis for this difference, we synthesized a series of oligonucleotides carrying mutations across the CBF1 binding site and used these as competitors in electrophoretic mobility shift assays. The competition experiments indicated that a central core sequence, GTGGGAA, common to all known EBNA-2-responsive elements, is crucial for CBF1 binding. Flanking sequences on either side of this core influence the affinity for CBF1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Antigens, Viral↗

Maximal stress-induced transcription from the human HSP70 promoter requires interactions with the basal promoter elements independent of rotational alignment.

Transcription of the human HSP70 gene is regulated by a complex array of cis-acting promoter elements that respond to conditions that include normal conditions of cell growth and induction following physiological stress. We have examined the requirements of the basal and inducible promoter elements by using promoter mutations and a transient transfection assay. Multiple forms of stress-induced transcription, including heat shock and incubation with heavy metals or amino acid analogs, are mediated by a single heat shock element (HSE) between -105 and -91 consisting of three contiguous 5-base-pair units, NGAAN, that are inverted relative to adjacent units. Maximal inducible expression requires a fully functional basal promoter. Spacing mutations which alter the relative helical orientation of adjacent genetic elements have only minimal effects on basal and stress-inducible expression and show no effects of periodicity. In addition, placement of the HSE adjacent to the basal promoter removes the requirements for a fully functional basal promoter for maximal stress-inducible expression. These results suggest that factors bound at the HSE and the basal promoter can function through multiple interactions.

Base Sequence↗

Characterization of VSG gene expression site promoters and promoter-associated DNA rearrangement events.

The expressed variant cell surface glycoprotein (VSG) gene of Trypanosoma brucei is located at the 3' end of a large, telomeric, polycistronic transcription unit or expression site. We show that the region 45 kb upstream of the VSG gene, in the expression site on a 1.5-Mb chromosome, contains at least two promoters that are arranged in tandem, directing the transcription of the expression site. DNA rearrangement events occur specifically, at inactivation of the expression site, and these events delete the most upstream transcribed region and replace it with a large array of simple-sequence DNA, leaving the downstream promoter intact. Because of the placement of simple-sequence DNA, the remaining downstream promoter now becomes structurally identical to previously described VSG promoters. The downstream promoter is repetitive in the genome, since it is present at several different expression sites. Restriction fragment length polymorphism mapping allows grouping of the expression sites into two families, those with and those without an upstream transcription unit, and the DNA rearrangement events convert the expression sites from one type to the other. Deletion of the upstream transcription unit also leads to the loss of several steady-state RNAs. The findings may indicate a role for promoter-associated DNA rearrangement events, and/or interactions between tandemly arranged promoters, in expression site transcriptional control.

Animals↗

Analyses of promoter-proximal pausing by RNA polymerase II on the hsp70 heat shock gene promoter in a Drosophila nuclear extract.

Analyses of Drosophila cells have revealed that RNA polymerase II is paused in a region 20 to 40 nucleotides downstream from the transcription start site of the hsp70 heat shock gene when the gene is not transcriptionally active. We have developed a cell-free system that reconstitutes this promoter-proximal pausing. The paused polymerase has been detected by monitoring the hyperreactivity of thymines in the transcription bubble toward potassium permanganate. The pattern of permanganate reactivity for the hsp70 promoter in the reconstituted system matches the pattern found on the promoter after it has been introduced back into files by P-element-mediated transposition. Matching patterns of permanganate reactivity are also observed for a non-heat shock promoter, the histone H3 promoter. Further analysis of the hsp70 promoter in the reconstituted system reveals that pausing does not depend on sequence-specific interactions located immediately downstream from the pause site. Sequences upstream from the TATA box influence the recruitment of polymerase rather than the efficiency of pausing. Kinetic analysis indicates that the polymerase rapidly enters the paused state and remains stably in this state for at least 25 min. Further analysis shows that the paused polymerase will initially resume elongation when Sarkosyl is added but loses this capacity within minutes of pausing. Using an alpha-amanitin-resistant polymerase, we provide evidence that promoter-proximal pausing does not require the carboxy-terminal domain of the polymerase.

Amanitins↗

YY1 and NF1 both activate the human p53 promoter by alternatively binding to a composite element, and YY1 and E1A cooperate to amplify p53 promoter activity.

A novel transcription factor binding element in the human p53 gene promoter has been characterized. It lies about 100 bp upstream of the major reported start site for human p53 gene transcription. On the basis of DNase I footprinting studies, electromobility shift assay patterns, sequence specificity of binding, the binding pattern of purified transcription factors, effects of specific antibodies, and methylation interference analysis we have identified the site as a composite element which can bind both YY1 and NF1 in an independent and mutually exclusive manner. The site is conserved in the human, rat, and mouse p53 promoters. The occupancy of the site varies in a tissue-specific manner. It binds principally YY1 in nuclear extracts of rat testis and spleen and NF1 in extracts of liver and prostate. This may facilitate tissue-specific control of p53 gene expression. When HeLa cells were transiently transfected with human p53 promoter-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter constructs, a mutation in this composite element which disabled YY1 and NF1 binding caused a mean 64% reduction in basal p53 promoter activity. From mutations which selectively impaired YY1 or NF1 binding and the overexpression of YY1 or NF1 in HeLa cells we concluded that both YY1 and NF1 function as activators when bound to this site. In transient cotransfections E1A could induce the activity of the p53 promoter to a high level; 12S E1A was threefold as efficient as 13S E1A in this activity, and YY1 bound to the composite element was shown to mediate 55% of this induction. Overexpressed YY1 was shown to be able to synergistically activate the p53 promoter with E1A when not specifically bound to DNA. Deletion of an N-terminal domain of E1A, known to be required for direct E1A-YY1 interaction and E1A effects mediated through transcriptional activator p300, blocked the E1A induction of p53 promoter activity.

Animals↗

Analysis of an activatable promoter: sequences in the simian virus 40 late promoter required for T-antigen-mediated trans activation.

The late promoter of simian virus 40 (SV40) is activated in trans by the viral early gene product, T antigen. We inserted the wild-type late-promoter region, and deletion mutants of it, into chloramphenicol acetyltransferase transient expression vectors to identify promoter sequences which are active in the presence of T antigen. We defined two promoter activities. One activity was mediated by a promoter element within simian virus 40 nucleotides 200 to 270. The activity of this element was detectable only in the presence of an intact, functioning origin of replication and accounted for 25 to 35% of the wild-type late-promoter activity in the presence of T antigen. The other activity was mediated by an element located within a 33-base-pair sequence (simian virus nucleotides 168 to 200) which spans the junction of the 72-base-pair repeats. This element functioned in the absence of both the origin of replication and the T-antigen-binding sites and appeared to be responsible for trans-activated gene expression. When inserted into an essentially promoterless plasmid, the 33-base-pair element functioned in an orientation-dependent manner. Under wild-type conditions in the presence of T antigen, the activity of this element accounted for 65 to 75% of the late-promoter activity. The roles of the 33-base-pair element and T antigen in trans-activation are discussed.

Acetyltransferases↗

Why hospitals offer health promotion: perspectives for collaborating with health promotion practitioners.

Most hospitals have expanded their services in recent years to become involved with health promotion programs and activities. A hospital might offer health promotion services to promote health and to raise the health status of its community. However, it might provide health promotion for other reasons, such as to improve the hospital's cost-effectiveness, competitive strategy, organizational legitimacy, or tax exemption. Health promotion practitioners who collaborate with a hospital for health promotion should understand the hospital's reasons for providing health promotion. Furthermore, they should understand that different reasons may lead to different priority populations, resource commitments, organizational structures, work processes, and health outcomes.

Community Health Planning↗

The promoter targeting sequence facilitates and restricts a distant enhancer to a single promoter in the Drosophila embryo.

Transcriptional enhancers in large gene complexes activate promoters over huge distances, yet little is known about the mechanism of these long-range interactions. We report that the promoter targeting sequence (PTS) from the Abdominal-B locus of the Drosophila bithorax complex facilitates the activity of a distantly located enhancer in transgenic embryos and that it restricts the enhancer to a single promoter. These functions are heritable in all successive generations. We also show that the PTS functions only when itself and an insulator are located between the enhancer and the promoter. These findings suggest that the PTS may facilitate long-range enhancer-promoter interactions in the endogenous Abdominal-B locus. We propose that the PTS establishes a stable chromatin structure between an enhancer and a promoter, which facilitates yet restricts an enhancer to a single promoter.

Animals↗

Measuring incentives to health promotion in older adults. Understanding neglected health promotion in older adults.

Health promotion increases longevity and allows older persons to maintain an independent and satisfying life. Determining reasons why an older person participates in health promotion activities through incentives may allow further insight into ways to promote health. As deeper understanding of motivation is gained by health professionals, successful influences to health behavior may be clarified. A nurse's role in health promotion could be to assist in planning a health promotion program, especially after incentives have been identified for a particular person. The Incentive-Health Promotion Scale revealed that the major incentives to health promotion in study sample were "feel good" and "fitness and health".

Aged↗

Functional analysis of the promoter region of the human phosphotyrosine phosphatase activator gene: Yin Yang 1 is essential for core promoter activity.

The phosphotyrosine phosphatase activator (PTPA) has been isolated as an in vitro regulator of protein phosphatase 2A. Human PTPA is encoded by a single gene, the structure and chromosomal localization of which have been determined in our previous work. Here we describe the further isolation, sequencing and functional characterization of the PTPA promoter region. In agreement with its ubiquitous expression, the PTPA promoter displays several characteristics of housekeeping genes: it lacks both a TATA-box and a CAAT-box, it is very GC-rich and it contains an unmethylated CpG island surrounding the transcription initiation site. Transient transfection experiments in different cell types with several truncated chimaeric luciferase reporter gene plasmids revealed the importance of the region between positions -67 and -39 for basal promoter activity. This region coincides remarkably well with the determined CpG island. Further analysis of this region demonstrated the presence of a Yin Yang 1 (YY1) binding motif at positions -52 to -44. Binding of YY1 to this sequence is demonstrated in bandshift and DNase I footprinting experiments. Another YY1 binding motif is found in the 5' untranslated region, at positions +27 to +35. Mutations in either of these sites, abolishing YY1 binding in vitro, have differential effects on promoter activity. Point mutations in both sites completely abolish promoter activity. Moreover, induction of promoter activity by co-transfection with a YY1 expression plasmid is fully dependent upon the presence of both intact YY1 binding sites. Thus YY1 apparently mediates basal transcription of the human PTPA gene through two binding sites within its proximal promoter.

Animals↗

Transcription at bacteriophage T4 variant late promoters. An application of a newly devised promoter-mapping method involving RNA chain retraction.

Bacteriophage T4 late promoters display a conserved sequence that extends over about 18 base pairs, in which the central 8-base pair sequence (TATAAATA in the nontranscribed strand) is absolutely conserved. Transcription by T4-modified RNA polymerase in vitro nevertheless initiates within a cluster of 6 overlapping variant T4 late promoters that deviate from the absolutely conserved sequence at one or two positions. One of these variant promoters is dominant, and its sequence implies that two of the absolutely conserved nucleotides (underlined above) are not essential. Three other variant promoters that contain only one of the deviations found in the dominant variant promoter are, at best, utilized weakly, suggesting that sequences outside the absolutely conserved segment are important for promoter function. A newly devised method, based on arrest of RNA chain elongation with ribonucleotide analogs and its reversal, has been used to precisely map initiation within the overlapping promoter cluster. Multiple cycles of RNA chain arrest, pyrophosphorolysis, and resynthesis can be executed. This process permits a precise stepwise control of the advance of a transcription complex through a gene.

Base Sequence↗

Differential binding of the chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter (COUP) transcription factor to two different promoters.

The COUP (chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter) transcription factor binds to the upstream promoters of both the chicken ovalbumin and the rat insulin II genes, even though the two binding sites have no obvious sequence similarity (Hwung, Y.-P., Crowe, D. T., Wang, L.-H., Tsai, S. Y., and Tsai, M.-J. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 2070-2077). Comparison of the contact points and important nucleotides in the two binding sites suggests that the COUP transcription factor binds to them in different ways. The purine contacts in the two promoters are limited to one face of the DNA helix; however, studies on phosphate contacts suggest that the COUP transcription factor wraps around the ovalbumin promoter, while it binds to only one face of the DNA helix in the insulin promoter. In addition, the binding factor makes a more extended contact on the insulin promoter as compared to the ovalbumin promoter. The potential significance of this novel finding is discussed.

Base Sequence↗

Developmental-dependent DNA methylation of the IGF2 and H19 promoters is correlated to the promoter activities in human liver development.

We have previously shown that the four promoters of the IGF2 gene are under a tight but dynamic control during human liver development, whereby P3 and P1 are reciprocally active before and after birth respectively while the P2 and P4 promoters are constitutively active at a relatively lower level. In this study, we investigated the methylation status of the promoters P1 and P3 of IGF2 and the promoter region of the H19 gene in developing human livers ranging from fetal to late adult. A region of about 300 bp immediately upstream of the IGF2 exon 5 was found to be subjected to a developmental-specific methylation and this may correlate to the P3 promoter activity. The P1 domain of IGF2 was also found to be methylated in a developmentally-specific pattern. The promoter region of the H19 gene displayed different methylation patterns in different development stages showing decreased general methylation with increase of age. Therefore, regional- and developmental-specific DNA methylation is displayed in the promoter regions of the IGF2 and H19 genes. This may be an important factor involved in gene regulation in the developing human liver.

Adult↗

Sp1 and Sp3 transactivate the human lipoprotein lipase gene promoter through binding to a CT element: synergy with the sterol regulatory element binding protein and reduced transactivation of a naturally occurring promoter variant.

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is a key enzyme in lipoprotein and energy metabolism and, therefore, regulation of its expression could have an important bearing on these processes. We have identified an evolutionarily conserved 5'-CCTCCCCCC-3' motif (from -91 to -83, CT element) in the human LPL gene promoter, deletion or mutation of which caused approximately 70-80% decrease in promoter activity. We found that Sp1 and Sp3 in THP-1 nuclear protein extracts bind specifically to this element. Co-transfection with Sp1 and Sp3 expression plasmids transactivated the LPL promoter via the CT element in Drosophila SL2 cells devoid of Sp proteins. Sp3 moderately repressed Sp1-mediated LPL promoter activation when both were co-expressed in SL2 cells. Furthermore, co-expression of an active sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP-1), with Sp1, but not with Sp3, synergistically activated the LPL promoter in SL2 cells. We previously reported a naturally occurring T-->G substitution at position -93 of the human LPL promoter which reduces promoter activity by 40-50% in transient transfection assays. In this study, we showed that this substitution results in reduced binding affinity to Sp1/Sp3 and in diminished transactivation by Sp1/Sp3 alone and by the synergistic action of Spl and SREBP-1 In conclusion, recruitment of Sp1/Sp3 by the CT element may play an important role in expression of the human lipoprotein lipase gene. Synergistic transcriptional activation by Sp1 and SREBP-1 may provide a mechanism for cross-talk between cholesterol and triglyceride metabolic pathways.

Base Sequence↗