Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Premedication”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Value of sedative premedication in female sterilization via minilaparotomy: a prospective study of two local anaesthesia regimen.

A prospective study of two local anaesthesia regimen for female sterilization is presented. A total of 1,077 female clients were sterilized via minilaparotomy under local anaesthesia (ML/LA) as outpatients. The clients underwent pre-operative screening and received pre-operative and continuing counselling. The first 257 of these clients were sedated with an intramuscular injection of pethidine after atropine premedication (pre-sedated group). The other clients (non-sedated group) were premedicated with atropine alone, without sedation. For the pre-sedated group, the mean volume of one percent lignocaine used was 18.3 (S.D. 2.2) ml, the mean length of surgical incision was 2.8 (S.D. 0.5) cm, and the mean duration of surgical was 15.8 (S.D. 5.3) minutes; 8.2% of these clients reported that they felt much pain. In comparison, 7.7% of the non-sedated group clients reported much pain following a mean of 17.7 ml of one percent lignocaine (S.D. 2.7) through an incision of mean length 2.5 (S.D. 0.5) cm for surgery lasting a mean of 14.5 (S.D. 4.5) minutes. Clients who were pre-medicated with pethidine were more likely to have multiple post-operative complaints, especially dizziness, faintness, headache, nausea and vomiting. This study found no significant difference in the clinical performance of female sterilization by minilaparotomy, duration of operation, length of incision, amount of local anaesthesia required or perception of pain between clients who were premedicated with intramuscular pethidine and those who were not.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗
PubMed1997

[Anxiety and stress reaction and its management in ambulatory gastrointestinal endoscopy: is premedication justified?].

This study is a contribution to the the question, whether the fear of ambulant gastrointestinal endoscopy generally justifies an anxiolytic premedication. Intensity of the stress reaction (subjective stress reactions, cardiovascular and endocrinological stress parameters), situation-specific determinants and coping behavior were analyzed one week and immediately before and immediately after the diagnostic procedure in N = 135 patients. The results showed significant effects of the procedure on subjective, cardiovascular and endocrinological stress parameters. Furthermore, other stress-eliciting conditions like former experiences with the procedure, behavior of the doctor and the assisting staff, organisational conditions could be identified. All in all, for most of the patients the endoscopy examination was less aversive as reported in the literature. According to our results, the amount of fear and stress reactions cannot justify the risks of an anxiolytic premedication. Only for a small group of patients (about 25%) the question of premedication should be proved individually. These patients can be identified by a questionnaire or by a rough screening of the anxiety level by behavior observation during a preparating anamnesis.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Single-dose dexamethasone paclitaxel premedication.

Paclitaxel is one of the most active chemotherapy agents for the treatment of ovarian and other gynecologic cancers. Hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) remain one of the major clinical concerns in the use of paclitaxel. This report deals with 183 consecutive patients treated with paclitaxel chemotherapy. A total of 1010 cycles were administered. Premedication consisted of single-dose intravenous decadron, benadryl, and cimetidine administered immediately prior to chemotherapy. Four hypersensitivity reactions occurred. All patients recovered uneventfully from these reactions. Two of these patients received additional oral decadron followed by the standard premedication and were successfully retreated with multiple courses of paclitaxel therapy without reaction. Our findings confirm other reports that paclitaxel chemotherapy hypersensitivity reactions can be decreased with a single-dose intravenous decadron premedication regimen and that patients who do have paclitaxel HSRs may be safely retreated with paclitaxel.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Premedication with dextromethorphan provides posthemorrhoidectomy pain relief.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists provide a preemptive analgesic effect in humans. This study was designed to examine whether premedication with dextromethorphan, an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist, also provided a preemptive analgesic effect that improved postoperative pain management. METHODS: Sixty patients who were American Society of Anesthesiologists status I and II scheduled for hemorrhoidectomy (modified Whitehead procedure) were included in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to the control and study groups. For the control group patients received chlorpheniramine maleate (20 mg), a component of the injection form of dextromethorphan, intramuscular injection 30 minutes before skin incision. In the study group dextromethorphan 40 mg containing 20 mg chlorpheniramine maleate (intramuscular) was given as premedication 30 minutes before skin incision. Pethidine (1 mg/kg, intramuscular) was given for pain relief as required postoperatively. The time to first pethidine injection, total pethidine consumption, worst pain score, and pethidine-related side effects were recorded for 48 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: The times to first pethidine injection (mean +/- standard error of the mean) were 5.2 +/- 3 and 19.6 +/- 6 hours in the control and study groups, respectively. Total pethidine consumption was 140 +/- 11.3 and 63.5 +/- 11.8 mg in the control and study groups. The worst visual analog scale pain scores were 7.4 +/- 0.2 and 5.6 +/- 0.3 in the control and study groups during the two-day observation. The numbers of patients who required pethidine injection were 29 and 20 in the control and study groups, respectively. Two patients suffered pethidine-related side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and headache, in the control group, and no patient complained of any side effect in the study group. CONCLUSION: We found that dextromethorphan premedication provided a preemptive analgesic effect, thus producing reduced postoperative pain and pethidine requirement and improved recovery from hemorrhoidectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed1976

Lorazepam as a premedication.

A double-blind random study compared the effects of lorazepam and pantopon an intra-muscular premedication in healthy women for uterine curettage (D & C). Anxiety, as assessed by a self-rating test by the patient and by a trained observer, showed a significant reduction at one and one-half hours after lorazepam and a smaller reduction after pantopon, which was not significant. Sedation was satisfactory with no significant difference between the two drugs in the change before and after the premedication. Lorazepam showed much more amnesia than pantopon (p less than 0.001). The patients who had lorazepam required higher doses of thiopentone for the operation, and this, in part, led to longer intervals in recovery times after lorazepam. However, it is suggested that lorazepam itself was partly responsible for the longer recovery. Pantopon was followed by more nausea, vomiting and headaches, than lorazepam. The intra-muscular injection of lorazepam hurt more patients than did pantopon, but other local complications were negligible and comparable in both groups. The results of this study show that lorazepam produces better reduction of anxiety and much more amnesia than pantopon, with comparable sedation and much less nausea and vomiting. The only disadvantage of lorazepam is the lack of analgesia and, therefore, the need for more anaesthesia during the operation. The conclusion is that lorazepam is a very satisfactory premedication and warrants more use as such.

Adult↗
PubMed1981

Premedication with meperidine and atropine does not prolong recovery to street fitness after out-patient surgery.

The effect of premedication with meperidine and atropine on recovery to street fitness after out-patient surgery under general anaesthesia was assessed. The subjects of this study were 100 female patients undergoing therapeutic abortion. Two anaesthetic techniques were used; thiopentone-enflurane-nitrous oxide and thiopentone-fentanyl-nitrous oxide. The patients were comparable in age, weight, length of anaesthesia and time for recovery to street fitness after anaesthesia. The amount of thiopentone administered to the thiopentone-fentanyl-nitrous oxide groups was significantly greater than that administered to the thiopentone-enflurane-nitrous oxide groups. It is concluded that premedication with meperidine and atropine did not significantly prolong recovery to street fitness after out-patient surgery. Fear of prolonged recovery should not affect the decision to use premedication.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Premedication of children with oral midazolam.

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the safety, efficacy and feasibility of oral midazolam premedication in children were evaluated in an ambulatory surgery unit. Eighty unmedicated children (ASA PS I or II, ages 1-6 yr) were randomly assigned to one of four groups receiving midazolam 0.5, 0.75, or 1.0 mg.kg-1 or a placebo 30 min before separation from parents. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, sedation and anxiolysis scores were recorded before premedication, every five minutes for 30 min and then during induction of anaesthesia and recovery. We found that heart rate, systolic blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation and respiratory rate were unchanged during the study. Sedation and anxiolysis scores in the midazolam-treated groups were greater than those in the placebo group and that anxiolysis at the time of separation from the parents was judged excellent in 80-90% of the children who received midazolam. However, sedation and anxiolysis did not differ among the three midazolam groups. Mean times to discharge from hospital were similar for all four groups. The side effects, loss of balance and head control, blurred vision and dysphoric reactions were observed only in the 0.75 and 1.0 mg.kg-1 midazolam groups. We conclude that oral midazolam 0.5 mg.kg-1 is a safe and effective premedication and that 0.75 and 1 mg.kg-1 while offering no additional benefit, may cause more side effects.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1984

Premedication with intramuscular midazolam: effect on induction time with intravenous midazolam compared to intravenous thiopentone or ketamine.

Our study sought to determine whether premedication with intramuscular midazolam would decrease the time to induction of anaesthesia with intravenous midazolam, and if so whether induction of anaesthesia would be as rapid as with thiopentone or ketamine, intravenously. Eight-nine patients, ASA physical status I or II, received midazolam 0.2 mg X kg-1, thiopentone 3.0 mg X kg-1, or ketamine 2.0 mg X kg-1 intravenously 60-90 min after intramuscular injection of either midazolam 0.07 mg X kg-1 or matching placebo. Time to induction of anaesthesia or the dose required to induce anaesthesia with intravenous midazolam was not decreased by midazolam premedication. Both with or without premedication, midazolam induction time was longer than with thiopentone or ketamine. Midazolam induction was associated with a lower incidence of blood pressure increase than with ketamine induction, and a lower incidence of apnea than that with either thiopentone or ketamine.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Oral clonidine premedication reduces propofol requirement for laryngeal mask airway insertion.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of oral clonidine premedication on propofol requirement (ED(50)) for the insertion of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in healthy patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. METHODS: After ethics committee approval and informed consent, 41 patients were randomly assigned to receive 5 microg x kg(-1) clonidine po premedication 90 min before entering the operating room (n = 22), or no clonidine (n = 19). To alleviate pain associated with iv propofol, 3 ml lidocaine 2%iv were administered. General anesthesia was induced, 30 sec later, with propofol at a rate of 100 mg x min(-1) (600 ml x hr(-1)) iv. The dose of propofol at which insertion of the LMA was attempted was predetermined by modification of Dixon's up-and-down method with an initial dose of 2.5 mg x kg(-1) and 0.25 mg x kg(-1) as the step size. An LMA was inserted, without muscle relaxants or other adjuvants 90 sec after completion of the propofol injection, by an anesthesiologist blinded to the treatment of the patient. RESULTS: The ED(50) of propofol for LMA insertion in clonidine-treated patients (2.0 +/- 0.2 mg x kg(-1), 1.8-2.3 mg x kg(-1) [95% confidence interval]), was less than that in patients without clonidine (2.5 +/- 0.1 mg x kg(-1), 2.4-2.6 mg x kg(-1), P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Oral clonidine premedication reduces propofol requirement for LMA insertion.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Midazolam premedication reduces propofol requirements for sedation during regional anesthesia.

PURPOSE: Propofol is often used for sedation during spinal anesthesia. We investigated the effects of midazolam premedication on the propofol requirements and incidence of complications during sedation. METHODS: In a prospective randomized, controlled, and single-blinded study, 50 patients undergoing elective gynecological surgery were randomly divided into control and midazolam groups. Patients in the midazolam group received 2 mg midazolam im 30 min before arrival at the operation room. After spinal anesthesia was instituted with intrathecal injection of hyperbaric tetracaine, we provided sedation using continuous infusion of propofol. The level of sedation was controlled at a level between "eyes closed but rousable to command" and "eyes closed but rousable to mild physical stimulation" by adjusting the infusion rate. During sedation, the propofol requirements and complications were recorded and patients were asked, two hours after the end of operation, whether they remembered intraoperative events. RESULTS: In the midazolam group, the loading dose, steady state infusion rate, and overall infusion rate of propofol were 0.74 mg x kg(-1), 2.86 mg x kg(-1) x hr(-1), and 3.32 mg x kg(-1) x hr(-1), respectively, which were about 17% lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Moreover, midazolam premedication reduced the incidence of intraoperative memory (P < 0.05), but had no effects on other complications. CONCLUSION: Midazolam premedication reduced propofol requirements and the incidence of intraoperative memory during sedation. These effects on sedation using propofol during spinal anesthesia are considered beneficial for patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Premedication with H1 and H2 blocking agents reduces the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing anaesthesia and surgery frequently complain about postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Whether pretreatment with H1 and H2 blocking agents reduces the incidence of PONV remains controversial. To answer this question, we performed a randomised, prospective, placebo-controlled clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of a premedication with H1 and H2 receptor antagonists. MATERIAL AND SUBJECTS: 1149 patients (both sexes) undergoing surgery were randomly assigned to three treatment groups and one control group. Patients in the treatment groups were premedicated with the following H1 + H2 receptor antagonists:Group 1 (n = 335): 5 mg/kg cimetidine i.v. + 0.1 mg/kg dimetindene i.v. 20 min before induction of anaesthesiaGroup 2 (n = 337): 1.25 mg/kg ranitidine i.v. + 0.1 mg/kg dimetindene i.v. 20 min before induction of anaesthesiaGroup 3 (n = 316): 300 mg ranitidine p.o. + 0.1 mg/kg dimetindene i.v. 1 to 2 h before induction of anaesthesiaGroup 4 (n = 161): 20 ml saline solution i.v. 20 min before induction of anaesthesiaPatients from the treatment groups 1, 2 and 3 received regional or general anaesthesia depending on the clinical decision. All control patients received general anaesthesia consisting of fentanyl, a thiobarbiturate, enflurane, nitrous oxide, oxygen, and vecuronium. RESULTS: The incidence of nausea and vomiting was 8.5%, 6.8% and 5.4% in patients from the treatment groups (1, 2 and 3) who underwent general anaesthesia (n = 545), with no statistically significant differences between groups. The incidence of nausea and vomiting in the control group (n = 161) was 28.3% (nausea) and 27.5% (vomiting), respectively. In patients who underwent regional anaesthesia (n = 443), the incidence of nausea and vomiting was 2.5% and 1.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Premedication with H1 and H2 blocking agents significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

[Clonidine premedication and isoflurane anesthesia to reduce bleeding in otologic surgery].

Seventy-seven ASA 1 patients scheduled for ear surgery were premedicated orally, 90 min before anaesthesia. They were randomly assigned to two groups, according to the drug used: hydroxyzine alone (group T, n = 39) or combined with clonidine (4.9 +/- 0.3 micrograms.kg-1) (group C, n = 38). Anaesthesia was induced with midazolam (0.3 mg.kg-1) and alfentanil (30 micrograms.kg-1). Ventilation was controlled with a 50/50 v/v mixture of oxygen and nitrous oxide (FETCO2 = 4 to 4.5%), and anaesthesia was maintained with repeated injections of alfentanil (15 micrograms.kg-1 at the start of surgery, and then every 15 min) and with isoflurane (mean end-expiratory concentration 0.6 +/- 0.3 vol %). Surgical bleeding was assessed every ten minutes on a numerical scale with four values. A bloodless surgical field was obtained by adjusting the isoflurane concentration up to 2 MAC, and by using a trinitrine infusion as required. Cardiovascular monitoring included an electrocardioscope and automatic blood pressure measurements. Before induction of anaesthesia, the blood pressure was lower in group C (84.7 +/- 11.2 vs. 95.9 +/- 106 mmHg) (p less than 0.001); the difference in heart rate was not significant (65 +/- 15 vs. 70.6 +/- 14 b.min-1). Moderate stable intraoperative hypotension was obtained in both groups. However, mean arterial blood pressure (C:65.8 +/- 7.8 mmHg; T: 73 +/- 9.4 mmHg) and heart rate (C: 53.4 +/- 6.8 b.min-1; T: 60.4 +/- 8 b.min-1) were significantly lower in the patients premedicated with clonidine (p less than 0.001). There were more periods of sinus bradycardia (heart rate less than or equal to 50 b.min-1), mostly seen before the beginning of surgery, in group C patients (p less than 0.01); atropine was also required more often (when the heart rate was less than or equal to 40 b.min-1) in this group of patients (NS). The comparative assessment of surgical field quality was in favour of group C (no troublesome bleeding) as opposed to the control group (16% troublesome bleeding); there were also more bloodless surgical fields in the former group (73.7% vs. 48.7% in group T, p less than 0.05). This study therefore demonstrated that clonidine premedication before anaesthesia with isoflurane was helpful in decreasing bleeding during ear surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

[Effects of nifedipine premedication on peroperative hypothermia].

The intraoperative time-course of core temperature in patients premedicated with nifedipine (n = 30) was compared to that of control patients (n = 30). Distal oesophageal temperature (TCORE) was recorded every five minutes during total hip replacement in 60 adults ranked ASA 1 to 2. Patients in the control group were only premedicated with 100 mg of oral hydroxyzine. The treatment group consisted of 30 patients taking nifedipine for blood pressure control or coronary insufficiency. They were given 10 mg sublingual nifedipine as well as the hydroxyzine premedication. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone, fentanyl and vecuronium, and maintained with nitrous oxide in oxygen and halothane in a semi-closed circuit. The slopes of the time-course for TCORE were established for each patient, using two linear regressions, between 0 and 0.5 h and from 1 to 2 h. The two groups did not differ in age, weight, ambient temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, and volume of unwarmed blood transfused. TCORE differed significantly from the 25th minute on until the end of the study period. Contrary to all expectation the TCORE at 2 h was higher in the nifedipine group (34.85 +/- 0.09 degrees C) than in the control group (34.01 +/- 0.14 degrees C, p < 0.001). TCORE decreased more rapidly in the control group during the first study interval (0 to 0.5 h), -1.50 +/- 0.60 degrees C.h-1 vs -2.34 +/- 1.02 degrees C.h-1 (p < 0.001). The second slopes did not differ particularly (-0.96 +/- 1.32 degrees C.h-1 vs -0.90 +/- 0.42 degrees C.h-1 respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed1984

[Intramuscular premedication with midazolam in infants and children].

The useful intramuscular premedication dose of midazolam was determined in 100 children divided up in three age groups: one month to three years, 3 to 10 years, 10 to 15 years. All biometric parameters were normal for the age, and comparable between similar age groups. Haemodynamic and respiratory parameters were not altered by the premedication. The reduction in anxiety, as assessed by the child's behaviour, was good or excellent in more than 85% of cases from all age groups; it was proportional to the dose used. The doses that had, for equivalent reductions in anxiety as assessed by the chi-square test, the least hypnotic effect, were: 0.5 mg X kg-1 before three years of age, 0.4 mg X kg-1 for the 3 to 10 yr olds, and 0.25 mg X kg-1 for the 10 to 15 yr olds. This fall in dose with age, quite usual in paediatrics, was not unexpected. The level of consciousness, one hour after surgery, was always normal. No undesirable side-effect was observed. These results, together with its physical, chemical and pharmacodynamic characteristics, make midazolam a choice drug for intramuscular premedication in children, with a foreseeable use in day-care anaesthesia. The unexpected finding of an age-dependent dissociation between the reduction in anxiety and the hypnotic effect is discussed in the light of a study carried out in the adult and recent data from the literature.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

A comparison of two sedative premedications for minor oral surgery under local anaesthesia.

Two commonly used drug combinations were studied as premedications before surgical 3rd molar removal under local anaesthesia. The study was randomized, crossover and double-blind in 12 patients. Our routine premedication for lengthy operations, consisting of diazepam 10 mg p.o. plus i.m. scopolamine 0.006 mg/kg and morphine 0.2 mg/kg, was compared with a combination of diazepam 10 mg p.o. plus metoprolol 50 mg p.o. The latter combination was expected to cause fewer central nervous system side effects and be more suitable for out-patient surgery. Drug levels in blood, physiological and biochemical indicators of operation-related stress, CNS side effects, and the patients' subjective preferences were monitored. Both combinations were equally accepted by the patients, but the diazepam/scopolamine/morphine combination caused clearly more side effects after discharge than diazepam/metoprolol. The operation-related haemodynamic changes and plasma catecholamine responses were similar after both premedications.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Detection of intravascular epidural catheters using 2-chloroprocaine. Influence of local anesthetic dose and nalbuphine premedication.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Detecting the intravascular placement of epidural catheters is essential to avoid local anesthetic toxicity. Small doses of intravenous local anesthetics produce changes in sensorium and are often used to test newly placed epidural catheters. Many parturients receive nalbuphine for analgesia prior to epidural catheter placement. This study examines how nalbuphine premedication influences symptoms following intravenous 2-chloroprocaine. METHODS: Thirty-one volunteers were randomized to receive premedication with placebo or 0.15 mg/kg of nalbuphine intravenously. Starting 10 minutes later, intravenous injections of 0.0, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, and 1.5 mg/kg of 2-chloroprocaine were given in random order at 10 minute intervals. After each injection, volunteers were asked to report changes in hearing, taste, or other symptoms. RESULTS: Symptoms reported (in decreasing order of frequency) were auditory changes, taste changes, dizziness/ lightheadedness, tingling in the extremities, and visual changes. The probability that volunteers will report symptoms is proportional to the dose of 2-chloroprocaine administered (auditory symptoms, P < .001; taste symptoms, P = .01; any symptoms, P < .001). Nalbuphine-premedicated volunteers were more likely to report symptoms (auditory symptoms, P = .004; taste symptoms, P = .004; any symptoms, P = .02). A dose of at least 1.5 mg/kg appears to be necessary to produce a 90% probability that patients will report symptoms when they receive 2-chloroprocaine intravenously. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that patients who receive nalbuphine for analgesia prior to epidural placement will be more likely to report symptoms after receiving intravenous 2-chloroprocaine during epidural test dosing.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

2-Chloroprocaine and bupivacaine are unreliable indicators of intravascular injection in the premedicated patient.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epinephrine-containing test doses for detection of intravascular injection during epidural anesthesia may be unreliable or hazardous in beta-blocked, elderly, or pregnant patients. Subtoxic injections of lidocaine have been used as an alternative marker of intravascular injection in unpremedicated patients. We studied two groups of premedicated patients and unpremedicated subjects to evaluate the reliability of the local anesthetics bupivacaine (B) and 2-chloroprocaine (2-CP) as test dose injections. METHODS: Thirty ASA I and II subjects received blinded randomized injections of 2-CP, B, or normal saline via a peripheral vein. RESULTS: In group I, 10 healthy unpremedicated volunteers universally recognized injection of 90 mg 2-CP or 25 mg B, but did not reliably detect the injection of 60 mg 2-CP. In group II, 20 patients premedicated with 1 microg/kg fentanyl and 30 microg/kg midazolam could not reliably detect similar injections. Sixteen responded to the injection of 90 mg 2-CP, while 13 detected the 25 mg B test dose. A blinded observer rated only 12 of the subjective reports as conclusive of detection of intravascular injection after each drug. There were no false-positive reports in any group. CONCLUSIONS: While 90 mg 2-CP or 25 mg B may be reliable alternatives to epinephrine test doses in unpremedicated subjects, they are unreliable indicators of intravascular injection in the premedicated patient.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Oral premedication with midazolam in paediatric anaesthesia. Effects on sedation and gastric contents.

The aim of this study was to assess oral premedication with midazolam in paediatric anaesthesia. Sedation, quality of induction, recovery time, acceptance and effects on gastric contents were analysed. This prospective, double blind, at random and controlled study was performed in 107 children, aged between three and ten years. They were divided into: group 1 (control, n = 29), group 2 (placebo) receiving 5 ml of water in the preoperative stage (n = 40), and group 3 (midazolam) with 0.75 mg.kg-1 midazolam by mouth (n = 38). Two children refused to take medication. In children aged five years or more (n = 48) of groups 2 and 3, acceptance of premedication was evaluated. The midazolam group showed a better level of sedation as compared with the placebo (P < 0.05). The recovery time was similar for the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in gastric pH or residual volume among the three groups. It is concluded that midazolam given by mouth is an efficient and safe drug for premedication in paediatric anaesthesia.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗