Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “MALINGERING”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources

Identification of malingered head injury on the Halstead-Reitan battery.

Heaton et al. (1978) demonstrated that the performance of malingerers and actual head trauma patients could be distinguished on the HRB by discriminant analysis. The present study replicated Heaton et al.'s methodology on a larger sample to provide a more stable function for discriminating simulated and real head trauma. Malingerers (n = 80) were instructed to fake severe deficits without being obvious. Patients (n = 80) had documented trauma and were not litigating for compensation. Groups were matched on age, gender, and overall Impairment Index to permit comparisons between patterns of performance. A crossvalidated step-wise discriminant function correctly identified 88.75% of the groups, with 83.8% true positives and 93.8% true negatives. This function was applied to several published data sets. Both malingerer and patient groups were accurately identified in Heaton et al. (1978) and Trueblood and Schmidt (1993). Faust et al.'s (1988) adolescent malingerer and the malingered performance of three litigating patients published by Cullum et al. (1991), were also correctly classified.

Journal Article↗

A multidimensional approach towards malingering detection.

A validation study using 62 subjects was conducted on the Multidimensional Investigation of Neuropsychological Dissimulation (MIND), a new neuropsychological instrument used to detect exaggeration of brain-injury symptoms. This instrument has eight scoring indices that use multiple, empirically based strategies to detect poor effort. Discriminant function analysis was used to classify three groups of subjects: normals responding in a sincere manner (N=24); normals who were educated about mild to moderate head injuries and given substantial incentives to malinger without obvious detection (N=21); and clinically diagnosed, brain-injured patients with mild to moderate impairments (N=17). A univariate F test indicated significant group differences on six of the eight original predictor variables. Using these six variables, there was an overall classification rate of 68%, reflecting only a 10% false negative rate in the dissimulating group. For a two-group classification (i.e., dissimulating and mildly to moderately brain-injured subjects), an 82% overall accuracy rate was achieved. The MIND appears to have potential for identifying individuals exaggerating mild to moderate neuropsychological deficits.

Journal Article↗

Suspected malingering and the Digit Memory Test: a replication and extension.

This study replicated a previous finding that suspected malingerers often perform at a level worse than patients with unequivocal brain dysfunction on the Digit Memory Test (DMT). In addition, it was demonstrated that patients suffering from aphasia as well as temporal and "frontal lobe" damage perform at a level higher than suspected malingerers. DMT performance of patients with true dementia, however, may be difficult to distinguish from suspected malingerers. If an individual is not demented (as judged by such tests as the BNI Screen for Higher Cerebral Functions) and performs at a level less than 95% across three trials of the DMT, the question of noncooperation with testing procedures or "malingering" should be considered.

Journal Article↗

Malingering test.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Blindness↗

Malingering.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Hearing Disorders↗