Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Family Practice”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources

Ethical and legal issues in family practice.

The unique goal of family practice, that of caring for the entire family's broadly defined health needs, places the family physician in an especially uncomfortable position when there is intrafamily conflict. In particular, the question of "whose agent (physician) are you?" when a family is in conflict often creates a serious ethical dilemma for the family physician. The roles of three experts who deal with family conflict, the psychotherapist, the lawyer, and the family physician, are compared and contrasted. The physician as expert is a useful approach only insofar as there are clearcut answers to a particular problem. But the ambiguity inherent in ethical problems makes this approach less than satisfactory. The role of the physician as teacher/facilitator is explored as an alternative to resolving the ethical dilemmas of intrafamily conflict.

Conflict, Psychological↗

Experience of family practice residents as athletic team physicians.

Providing exposure for family practice residence to all aspects of community medicine is a common goal of training programs. The Antelope Valley Hospital Medical Center Family Practice Program has initiated an innovative project which involves residents serving as team physicians for local college athletic teams. This provides a valuable opportunity for residents to learn skills they can be expected to need in their future practice. The team physician's role offers educational potential for family practice residents through experience with acute orthopedic problems as well as the preventive and psychological aspects of sports medicine. This role also serves as an example of physician responsibility for health-related activities in the acommunity.

Athletic Injuries↗

An information system for family practice. Part 1: Defining the practice population.

Information systems for family practice are vital in its development as an academic discipline, in the teaching and learning process which ultimately improves the quality of care, and in the planning processes which must be used to rationalize the distribution of scarce resources in the health-care field. The provision of sufficient data for these purposes demands a flexible system, generally one based on the computer as a data storing and analyzing tool. Such a system has been developed in the teaching practices of the Department of Family Medicine, University of Western Ontario; the methods employed and the uses for that system are to be described in a series of four papers. This first paper describes the methods developed for gathering demographic information on the practice population.

Demography↗

The evaluation of family practice residents: a national survey.

BACKGROUND: There is a significant lack of information regarding the evaluation of family practice residents. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all 397 family practice residency directors in the United States to determine the methods used in evaluating family practice residents. RESULTS: Seventy-nine percent of residency directors returned the survey. Family practice faculty are involved in the majority of resident evaluations and are trained in the evaluation process in 46% of the programs. The most common evaluation method was a written form completed in 99% of the programs for inpatient evaluations and in 67% for outpatient evaluations. The evaluation forms were five years or older in 30% of the programs and were rotation specific in 40% of the programs. Other evaluation methods included videotaping, peer and self-evaluations, and structured clinical examinations. CONCLUSIONS: Faculty development in evaluation performance is strongly encouraged. Written evaluation forms are used extensively, but the quality of these forms remains unknown. Further investigations into appropriate family practice evaluation methods are recommended.

Clinical Competence↗

Family practice as a specialty choice: effect of premedical and medical education.

Identification of beneficial and detrimental parameters influencing the choice of family practice as a career was the object of the study reported here. Curriculum components and elements during or before medical school were examined. A questionnaire listing 18 factors that influenced specialty choice before residency training was completed by 134 first-year family practice residents. Participation in a family practice clerkship or preceptorship during the third and fourth years of medical school and association with family physicians during or before medical school were perceived as most beneficial. Generally, students' experiences during the first three years were perceived as detrimental to selecting family practice. Also, data indicated that 75 percent of the students select their specialty during years three and four. Medical schools wishing to increase the number of their graduates entering family practice should strongly consider requiring clinical rotations in family medicine and providing maximum exposure to family practice residents and faculty members as role models.

Career Choice↗

Family practice residency program directors' views on research.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The culture of family practice training programs does little to convince residents that research is a worthwhile and important activity. The traditional dichotomy between research and clinical medicine persists today, despite an identified clinical mission for research. METHODS: As part of an effort to build the research capacity of family practice training programs, a telephone survey was administered in August 1995 to the program directors of all residency programs listed in the American Academy of Family Physicians 1995 Directory of Family Practice Residency Programs. The directors were asked about their program's research environment, features designed to promote research activity, and the level of resident research productivity. RESULTS: More than half (53.6%) of the program directors felt that their training program actively promotes research. Three out of four indicated that involving residents in research is a goal of their program. However, only four of 10 (40.8%) programs provide specific time for research, and family practice residents appear to be relatively inactive by conventional measures of research productivity. CONCLUSIONS: Research appears to be developing a limited role in family practice training programs. Resident research productivity remains relatively low and may be a result of residency programs not providing specific time for participating in research. However, the program directors' supportive attitudes may contribute to research and scholarly activity becoming an integral part of a family physician's training.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Responses to questions by medical students about family practice.

Medical students frequently have questions about the specialty of family practice. Responses to 30 questions commonly asked about family practice are presented with a review of recent literature. These responses may assist medical students and their advisors in considering the choice of family practice as a career.

Family Practice↗