Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cell Cycle Checkpoints”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Caffeine induces TP53-independent G(1)-phase arrest and apoptosis in human lung tumor cells in a dose-dependent manner.

Caffeine is a model radiosensitizing agent that is thought to work by abrogating the radiation-induced G(2)-phase checkpoint. In this study, we examined the effect that various concentrations of caffeine had on cell cycle checkpoints and apoptosis in cells of a human lung carcinoma cell line and found that a concentration of 0.5 mM caffeine could abrogate the G(2)-phase arrest normally seen after exposure to ionizing radiation. Surprisingly, at a concentration of 5 mM, caffeine not only induced apoptosis by itself and acted synergistically to enhance radiation-induced apoptosis, but also induced a TP53-independent G(1)-phase arrest. Examination of the molecular mechanisms by which caffeine produced these effects revealed that caffeine had opposing effects on different cyclin-dependent kinases. CDK2 activity was suppressed by caffeine, whereas activity of CDC2 was enhanced by suppressing phosphorylation on Tyr15 and by interfering with 14-3-3 binding to CDC25C. These data indicate that the effect of caffeine on cell cycle checkpoints and apoptosis is dependent on dose and that caffeine acts through differential regulation of cyclin-dependent kinase activity.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

DNA cross-linker-induced G2/M arrest in group C Fanconi anemia lymphoblasts reflects normal checkpoint function.

Cells from individuals with Fanconi anemia (FA) arrest excessively in the G2/M cell cycle compartment after exposure to low doses of DNA cross-linking agents. The relationship of this abnormality to the fundamental genetic defect in such cells is unknown, but many investigators have speculated that the various FA genes directly regulate cell cycle checkpoints. We tested the hypothesis that the protein encoded by the FA group C complementing gene (FAC) functions to control a cell cycle checkpoint and that cells from group C patients (FA[C]) have abnormalities of cell cycle regulation directly related to the genetic mutation. We found that retroviral transduction of FA(C) lymphoblasts with wild-type FAC cDNA resulted in normalization of the cell cycle response to low-dose mitomycin C (MMC). However, when DNA damage was quantified in terms of cytogenetic damage or cellular cytotoxicity, we found similar degrees of G2/M arrest in response to equitoxic amounts of MMC in FA(C) cells as well as in normal lymphoblasts. Similar results were obtained using isogenic pairs of uncorrected, FAC- or mock-corrected (neo only) FA(C) cell lines. To test the function of other checkpoints we examined the effects of hydroxyurea (HU) and ionizing radiation on cell cycle kinetics of FA(C) and normal lymphoblasts as well as with isogenic pairs of uncorrected, FAC-corrected, or mock-corrected FA(C) cell lines. In all cases the cell cycle response of FA(C) and normal lymphoblasts to these two agents were identical. Based on these studies we conclude that the aberrant G2/M arrest that typifies the response of FA(C) cells to low doses of cross-linking agents does not represent an abnormal cell cycle response but instead represents a normal cellular response to the excessive DNA damage that results in FA(C) cells following exposure to low doses of cross-linking agents.

Caffeine↗
PubMed1997

Ectopic TAL-1/SCL expression in phenotypically normal or leukemic myeloid precursors: proliferative and antiapoptotic effects coupled with a differentiation blockade.

The TAL-1 gene specifies a basic helix-loop-helix domain (bHLH) transcription factor, which heterodimerizes with E2A gene family proteins. tal-1 protein is abnormally expressed in the majority of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias (T-ALLs). tal-1 is expressed and plays a significant role in normal erythropoietic differentiation and maturation, while its expression in early myeloid differentiation is abruptly shut off at the level of late progenitors/early differentiated precursors (G. L. Condorelli, L. Vitelli, M. Valtieri, I. Marta, E. Montesoro, V. Lulli, R. Baer, and C. Peschle, Blood 86:164-175, 1995). We show that in late myeloid progenitors (the phenotypically normal murine 32D cell line) and early leukemic precursors (the human HL-60 promyelocytic leukemia cell line) ectopic tal-1 expression induces (i) a proliferative effect under suboptimal culture conditions (i.e., low growth factor and serum concentrations respectively), via an antiapoptotic effect in 32D cells or increased DNA synthesis in HL-60 cells, and (ii) a total or marked inhibitory effect on differentiation, respectively, on granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-induced granulopoiesis in 32D cells or retinoic acid- and vitamin D3-induced granulo- and monocytopoiesis in HL-60 cells. Furthermore, experiments with 32D temperature-sensitive p53 cells indicate that aberrant tal-1 expression at the permissive temperature does not exert a proliferative effect but causes p53-mediated apoptosis, i.e., the tal-1 proliferative effect depends on the integrity of the cell cycle checkpoints of the host cell, as observed for c-myc and other oncogenes. tal-1 mutant experiments indicate that ectopic tal-1 effects are mediated by both the DNA-binding and the heterodimerization domains, while the N-terminally truncated tal-1 variant (M3) expressed in T-ALL malignant cells mimics the effects of the wild-type protein. Altogether, our results (i) indicate proliferative and antidifferentiative effects of ectopic tal-1 expression, (ii) shed light on the underlying mechanisms (i.e., requirement for the integrity of the tal-1 bHLH domain and cell cycle checkpoints in the host cell, particularly p53), and (iii) provide new experimental models to further investigate these mechanisms.

Apoptosis↗
PubMed2001

Cell cycle progression and cell division are sensitive to hypoxia in Drosophila melanogaster embryos.

We and others recently demonstrated that Drosophila melanogaster embryos arrest development and embryonic cells cease dividing when they are deprived of O2. To further characterize the behavior of these embryos in response to O2 deprivation and to define the O2-sensitive checkpoints in the cell cycle, embryos undergoing nuclear cycles 3-13 were subjected to O2 deprivation and examined by confocal microscopy under control, hypoxic, and reoxygenation conditions. In vivo, real-time analysis of embryos carrying green fluorescent protein-kinesin demonstrated that cells arrest at two major points of the cell cycle, either at the interphase (before DNA duplication) or at metaphase, depending on the cell cycle phase at which O2 deprivation was induced. Immunoblot analysis of embryos whose cell divisions are synchronized by inducible String (cdc25 homolog) demonstrated that cyclin B was degraded during low O2 conditions in interphase-arrested embryos but not in those arrested in metaphase. Embryos resumed cell cycle activity within ~20 min of reoxygenation, with very little apparent change in cell cycle kinetics. We conclude that there are specific points during the embryonic cell cycle that are sensitive to the O2 level in D. melanogaster. Given the fact that O2 deprivation also influences the growth and development of other species, we suggest that similar hypoxia-sensitive cell cycle checkpoints may also exist in mammalian cells.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Coffee drinking: the rationale for treating it as a potential effect modifier of carcinogenic exposures.

Clinical and epidemiological studies on cancer etiology seldom treat coffee drinking as a potential effect modifier. Yet caffeine exerts significant effects upon a large variety of physiologic, cellular and molecular systems. Caffeine, 'the world's most popular drug', is also a fundamental research tool, widely used in clinical studies on drug metabolism, and in experimental studies on cell cycle checkpoints, DNA repair, and apoptosis, among many other. Caffeine can profoundly alter cell cycle checkpoint function and several mechanisms of DNA repair, as well as carcinogen metabolism. The impact of caffeine on cell cycle checkpoint function occurs in spite of it being nonmutagenic in traditional mutagenesis assays. A complex body of biologic evidence suggests that caffeine-containing beverages can both enhance and antagonise potentially carcinogenic exposures. However, most pathways leading to the ultimate effects in human beings remain unknown. It is unclear whether any of the hundreds of compounds contained in coffee and tea exert a direct and significant carcinogenic effect per se in any human tissue at usual conditions of use. Reasons exist to consider that coffee may sometimes be an indirect, positive confounder. The study of interactions between caffeine-containing beverages and environmental agents in well defined groups of healthy and diseased people could yield new insights into checkpoint signal transduction and other mechanisms of carcinogenesis. Information on the use of caffeine-containing beverages should more often be integrated in studies on the role of gene-environment interactions in the pathogenesis of cancer.

Coffee↗
PubMed2004

Overexpression of G1-S cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases during multistage human pancreatic duct cell carcinogenesis.

PURPOSE: Molecular analysis of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia lesions and ductal adenocarcinoma suggested a multistage paradigm for pancreatic duct cell carcinogenesis. This study investigated the molecular basis for the neoplastic duct cells in this pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia-carcinoma sequence to acquire progressive enhancement of their proliferative potential. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using tissue microarray blocks containing 15 to 40 pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia lesions and ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreas, we studied by immunohistochemistry the expression profiles of cyclins and cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) that regulate the G1-S cell cycle checkpoints. The role of cyclins D3 and D1 in three pancreatic cancer cell lines was investigated using specific short interfering RNA technique. RESULTS: Cyclin D3 overexpression was noted the earliest in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia-1A and was prevalent in 90% to 100% of high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias and ductal cancer. Cyclin A overexpression was also noted early and reached 50% to 100% of high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias and cancer, but the percentage of abnormal duct cells showing overexpression of cyclin A was significantly lower than cyclin D3. Cyclin E overexpression occurred in 20% to 25% of high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias and in 75% of ductal carcinoma. Cyclin D1 demonstrated the lowest frequency of overexpression that occurred late. CDK2 and CDK4 overexpression was also noted in early pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias and progressively increased to reach 60% to 75% in carcinoma. The down-regulation of cyclin D3 mRNA and protein levels using specific short interfering RNA resulted in growth inhibition of pancreatic cancer cell lines. CONCLUSION: The results provide additional insight into the mechanism of G1-S cell cycle checkpoints deregulation during stepwise pancreatic duct cell carcinogenesis, and suggest a p16-independent role for cyclin D3 in deregulating the G1 cell cycle checkpoints during early stages of pancreatic duct cell carcinogenesis.

Blotting, Western↗
PubMed2005

Grp/DChk1 is required for G2-M checkpoint activation in Drosophila S2 cells, whereas Dmnk/DChk2 is dispensable.

Cell-cycle checkpoints are signal-transduction pathways required to maintain genomic stability in dividing cells. Previously, it was reported that two kinases essential for checkpoint signalling, Chk1 and Chk2 are structurally conserved. In contrast to yeast, Xenopus and mammals, the Chk1- and Chk2-dependent pathways in Drosophila are not understood in detail. Here, we report the function of these checkpoint kinases, referred to as Grp/DChk1 and Dmnk/DChk2 in Drosophila Schneider's cells, and identify an upstream regulator as well as downstream targets of Grp/DChk1. First, we demonstrate that S2 cells are a suitable model for G(2)/M checkpoint studies. S2 cells display Grp/DChk1-dependent and Dmnk/DChk2-independent cell-cycle-checkpoint activation in response to hydroxyurea and ionizing radiation. S2 cells depleted for Grp/DChk1 using RNA interference enter mitosis in the presence of impaired DNA integrity, resulting in prolonged mitosis and mitotic catastrophe. Grp/DChk1 is phosphorylated in a Mei-41/DATR-dependent manner in response to hydroxyurea and ionizing radiation, indicating that Mei-41/ATR is an upstream component in the Grp/DChk1 DNA replication and DNA-damage-response pathways. The level of Cdc25(Stg) and phosphorylation status of Cdc2 are modulated in a Grp/DChk1-dependent manner in response to hydroxyurea and irradiation, indicating that these cell-cycle regulators are downstream targets of the Grp/DChk1-dependent DNA replication and DNA-damage responses. By contrast, depletion of Dmnk/DChk2 by RNA interference had little effect on checkpoint responses to hydroxyurea and irradiation. We conclude that Grp/DChk1, and not Dmnk/DChk2, is the main effector kinase involved in G(2)/M checkpoint control in Drosophila cells.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Sulforaphane-induced G2/M phase cell cycle arrest involves checkpoint kinase 2-mediated phosphorylation of cell division cycle 25C.

Previously, we showed that sulforaphane (SFN), a naturally occurring cancer chemopreventive agent, effectively inhibits proliferation of PC-3 human prostate cancer cells by causing caspase-9- and caspase-8-mediated apoptosis. Here, we demonstrate that SFN treatment causes an irreversible arrest in the G(2)/M phase of the cell cycle. Cell cycle arrest induced by SFN was associated with a significant decrease in protein levels of cyclin B1, cell division cycle (Cdc) 25B, and Cdc25C, leading to accumulation of Tyr-15-phosphorylated (inactive) cyclin-dependent kinase 1. The SFN-induced decline in Cdc25C protein level was blocked in the presence of proteasome inhibitor lactacystin, but lactacystin did not confer protection against cell cycle arrest. Interestingly, SFN treatment also resulted in a rapid and sustained phosphorylation of Cdc25C at Ser-216, leading to its translocation from the nucleus to the cytoplasm because of increased binding with 14-3-3beta. Increased Ser-216 phosphorylation of Cdc25C upon treatment with SFN was the result of activation of checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2), which was associated with Ser-1981 phosphorylation of ataxia telangiectasia-mutated, generation of reactive oxygen species, and Ser-139 phosphorylation of histone H2A.X, a sensitive marker for the presence of DNA double-strand breaks. Transient transfection of PC-3 cells with Chk2-specific small interfering RNA duplexes significantly attenuated SFN-induced G(2)/M arrest. HCT116 human colon cancer-derived Chk2(-/-) cells were significantly more resistant to G(2)/M arrest by SFN compared with the wild type HCT116 cells. These findings indicate that Chk2-mediated phosphorylation of Cdc25C plays a major role in irreversible G(2)/M arrest by SFN. Activation of Chk2 in response to DNA damage is well documented, but the present study is the first published report to link Chk2 activation to cell cycle arrest by an isothiocyanate.

Active Transport, Cell Nucleus↗
PubMed1997

Human papillomavirus E6 and E7 oncoproteins alter cell cycle progression but not radiosensitivity of carcinoma cells treated with low-dose-rate radiation.

PURPOSE: Low-dose-rate radiation therapy has been widely used in the treatment of urogenital malignancies. When continuously exposed to low-dose-rate ionizing radiation, target cancer cells typically exhibit abnormalities in replicative cell-cycle progression. Cancer cells that arrest in the G2 phase of the cell cycle when irradiated may become exquisitely sensitive to killing by further low-dose-rate radiation treatment. Oncogenic human papillomaviruses (HPVs), which play a major role in the pathogenesis of uterine cervix cancers and other urogenital cancers, encode E6 and E7 transforming proteins known to abrogate a p53-dependent G1 cell-cycle checkpoint activated by conventional acute-dose radiation exposure. This study examined whether expression of HPV E6 and E7 oncoproteins by cancer cells alters the cell-cycle redistribution patterns accompanying low-dose-rate radiation treatment, and whether such alterations in cell-cycle redistribution affect cancer cell killing. METHODS AND MATERIALS: RKO carcinoma cells, which contain wild-type P53 alleles, and RKO cell sublines genetically engineered to express HPV E6 and E7 oncoproteins, were treated with low-dose-rate (0.25-Gy/h) radiation and then assessed for p53 and p21WAF1/CIP1 polypeptide induction by immunoblot analysis, for cell-cycle redistribution by flow cytometry, and for cytotoxicity by clonogenic survival assay. RESULTS: Low-dose-rate radiation of RKO carcinoma cells triggered p53 polypeptide elevations, p21WAF1/CIP1 induction, and arrest in the G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle. In contrast, RKO cells expressing E6 and E7 transforming proteins from high-risk oncogenic HPVs (HPV 16) arrested in G2, but failed to arrest in G1, when treated with low-dose-rate ionizing radiation. Abrogation of the G1 cell-cycle checkpoint activated by low-dose-rate radiation exposure appeared to be a characteristic feature of transforming proteins from high-risk oncogenic HPVs: RKO cells expressing E6 from a low-risk nononcogenic HPV (HPV 11) exposed to low-dose-rate radiation arrested in both G1 and G2. Surprisingly, despite differences in cell-cycle redistribution accompanying low-dose-rate radiation treatment associated with high-risk HPV transforming protein expression, no consistent differences in clonogenic survival following low-dose-rate radiation treatment were found for RKO cell sublines expressing high-risk HPV oncoproteins and arresting only in G2 during low-dose-rate radiation exposure vs. RKO cell sublines exhibiting both G1 and G2 cell-cycle arrest when irradiated. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that neither HPV oncoprotein expression nor loss of the radiation-activated G1 cell-cycle checkpoint alter the sensitivity of RKO carcinoma cell lines to low-dose-rate radiation exposure in vitro. Perhaps for urogenital malignancies associated with oncogenic HPVs in vivo, HPV oncoprotein-mediated abrogation of the G1 cell-cycle checkpoint may not limit the potential efficacy of low-dose-rate radiation therapy.

Colonic Neoplasms↗
PubMed2003

A monitor for bud emergence in the yeast morphogenesis checkpoint.

Cell cycle transitions are subject to regulation by both external signals and internal checkpoints that monitor satisfactory progression of key cell cycle events. In budding yeast, the morphogenesis checkpoint arrests the cell cycle in response to perturbations that affect the actin cytoskeleton and bud formation. Herein, we identify a step in this checkpoint pathway that seems to be directly responsive to bud emergence. Activation of the kinase Hsl1p is dependent upon its recruitment to a cortical domain organized by the septins, a family of conserved filament-forming proteins. Under conditions that delayed or blocked bud emergence, Hsl1p recruitment to the septin cortex still took place, but hyperphosphorylation of Hsl1p and recruitment of the Hsl1p-binding protein Hsl7p to the septin cortex only occurred after bud emergence. At this time, the septin cortex spread to form a collar between mother and bud, and Hsl1p and Hsl7p were restricted to the bud side of the septin collar. We discuss models for translating cellular geometry (in this case, the emergence of a bud) into biochemical signals regulating cell proliferation.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗
PubMed1995

Induction of p53-, MDM2-, and WAF1/CIP1-like molecules in insect cells by DNA-damaging agents.

Cellular responses following DNA damage are ubiquitous in the biological world. In response to DNA damage, cell cycle checkpoints are activated, which delay cell cycle progression and most likely serve to allow time for repair. One important checkpoint in mammalian cells, activated in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, is dependent on the p53 tumor suppressor gene product. While p53 is responsible for inducing G1 arrest, the product of the MDM2 gene is believed to alleviate the arrest, allowing continuation of the cell cycle after a transient delay. Inasmuch as MDM2 and WAF1/CIP1 are transactivated by p53, while MDM2 binds to and modulates the activity of p53, a "feedback loop" is thus created. This pathway has been highly conserved in mammalian cells, but its presence outside of vertebrates is unknown. By using human MDM2 and WAF1/CIP1 cDNA probes, and monoclonal antibodies to p53 and Mdm2, we demonstrate in insect cell lines evidence for the existence of p53-, MDM2-, and WAF1/CIP1-like molecules and a p53-regulated pathway following treatment by DNA-damaging agents.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Regulation of apoptosis by E1A and Myc oncoproteins.

E1A and c-myc are oncogenes that can deregulate the cell cycle and promote transformation under conditions where normal cell-cycle checkpoints are inactivated. In situations where cell-cycle checkpoints are intact, the E1A and c-Myc proteins potently induce apoptosis, a property that is believed to be the end result of a cellular response to uncontrolled growth-promoting signals. p53 is a key regulator of E1A and c-myc-induced apoptosis and, together with the oncoproteins, may transcriptionally activate numerous genes whose products influence, or are themselves, members of the core apoptotic machinery. The upstream signaling events and the ultimate apoptotic pathways activated by E1A and c-Myc are discussed in this review.

Adenovirus E1A Proteins↗
PubMed2001

Reconstitution and molecular analysis of the hRad9-hHus1-hRad1 (9-1-1) DNA damage responsive checkpoint complex.

DNA damage activates cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that coordinate cell cycle arrest and DNA repair. Three of the proteins involved in checkpoint signaling, Rad1, Hus1, and Rad9, have been shown to interact by immunoprecipitation and yeast two-hybrid studies. However, it is not known how these proteins interact and assemble into a complex. In the present study we demonstrated that in human cells all the hRad9 and hHus1 and approximately one-half of the cellular pool of hRad1 interacted as a stable, biochemically discrete complex, with an apparent molecular mass of 160 kDa. This complex was reconstituted by co-expression of all three recombinant proteins in a heterologous system, and the reconstituted complex exhibited identical chromatographic behavior as the endogenous complex. Interaction studies using differentially tagged proteins demonstrated that the proteins did not self-multimerize. Rather, each protein had a binding site for the other two partners, with the N terminus of hRad9 interacting with hRad1, the N terminus of hRad1 interacting with hHus1, and the N terminus of hHus1 interacting with the C terminus of hRad9's predicted PCNA-like region. Collectively, these analyses suggest a model of how these three proteins assemble to form a functional checkpoint complex, which we dubbed the 9-1-1 complex.

Cell Cycle↗
PubMed2002

Molecular targets in cellular response to ionizing radiation and implications in space radiation protection.

DNA repair systems and cell cycle checkpoints closely co-operate in the attempt of maintaining the genomic integrity of cells damaged by ionizing radiation. DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) are considered as the most biologically important radiation-induced damage. Their spatial distribution and association with other types of damage depend on radiation quality. It is believed these features affect damage reparability, thus explaining the higher efficiency for cellular effects of densely ionizing radiation with respect to gamma-rays. DSB repair systems identified in mammalian cells are homologous recombination (HR), single-strand annealing (SSA) and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). Some enzymes may participate in more than one of these repair systems. DNA damage also triggers biochemical signals activating checkpoints responsible for delay in cell cycle progression that allows more time for repair. Those at G1/S and S phases prevent replication of damaged DNA and those at G2/M phase prevent segregation of changed chromosomes. Individuals with lack or alterations of genes involved in DNA DSB repair and cell cycle checkpoints exhibit syndromes characterized by genome instability and predisposition to cancer. Information reviewed in this paper on the basic mechanisms of cellular response to ionizing radiation indicates their importance for a number of issues relevant to protection of astronauts from space radiation.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Is low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity a measure of G2-phase cell radiosensitivity?

Low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity describes a phenomenon by which cells die from excessive sensitivity to small single doses of ionizing radiation below approximately 20-30 cGy. This review describes experimental data that strongly imply that low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity is exclusively associated with the survival response of cells in the G2 phase of the cycle. This G2-centric concept arose when the characteristic cell survival pattern that denotes low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity was not detected in the radiation survival response of cell populations enriched in G1 or S phase cells. In contrast, an extended or exaggerated low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity response was evident from populations selected to contain only G2 phase cells by flow cytometry cell sorting. The historical data that has defined the field of low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity will be considered with respect to the radiation sensitivity of, and cell cycle checkpoints specific to, G2 phase cells. A working model of the putative mechanism of low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity will be presented within this context. The foundation of the model is a rapidly occurring dose-dependent pre-mitotic cell-cycle checkpoint that is specific to cells irradiated in the G2 phase. This early G2 phase checkpoint has been demonstrated to exhibit a dose expression profile that is comparable to the cell-survival pattern that defines low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity and is therefore a likely key regulator of the phenomenon.

Animals↗
PubMed2025

FRET-FLIM for the Study of Protein-Protein Interactions Underpinning Mitosis Checkpoints.

Cell division is a key cellular process that ensures the continuation of life on Earth. In order to protect the genetic integrity of organisms, cell division must happen accurately, ensuring each daughter cell receives a complete copy of the original genome. The accuracy of this process is, in part, preserved by various cell cycle checkpoints. These checkpoints rely on the physical interactions of their components to ensure proper function. The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), for example, produces an inhibitory complex of BUBR1-BUB3 and MAD2 bound to CDC20. Many of these cell cycle checkpoint components have been identified in plants, but it has not yet been established whether plants have a mitotic checkpoint architecture that is similar to mammalian cells. To understand the function of plant cell cycle homologues, it is imperative to characterize their interactions in vivo. FRET-FLIM (Förster resonance energy transfer-fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy), is a rapidly expanding technique that can be used to rapidly and simply characterize protein-protein interactions.

Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer↗
PubMed2003

Caffeine inhibits checkpoint responses without inhibiting the ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) and ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR) protein kinases.

The ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) and ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR) kinases regulate cell cycle checkpoints by phosphorylating multiple substrates including the CHK1 and -2 protein kinases and p53. Caffeine has been widely used to study ATM and ATR signaling because it inhibits these kinases in vitro and overcomes cell cycle checkpoint responses in vivo. Thus, caffeine has been thought to overcome the checkpoint through its ability to prevent phosphorylation of ATM and ATR substrates. Surprisingly, I have found that multiple ATM-ATR substrates including CHK1 and -2 are hyperphosphorylated in cells treated with caffeine and genotoxic agents such as hydroxyurea or ionizing radiation. ATM autophosphorylation in cells is also increased when caffeine is used in combination with inhibitors of replication suggesting that ATM activity is not inhibited in vivo by caffeine. Furthermore, CHK1 hyperphosphorylation induced by caffeine in combination with hydroxyurea is ATR-dependent suggesting that ATR activity is stimulated by caffeine. Finally, the G2/M checkpoint in response to ionizing radiation or hydroxyurea is abrogated by caffeine treatment without a corresponding decrease in ATM-ATR-dependent signaling. This data suggests that although caffeine is an inhibitor of ATM-ATR kinase activity in vitro, it can block checkpoints without inhibiting ATM-ATR activation in vivo.

Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins↗
PubMed1998

Negative regulation of Wee1 expression and Cdc2 phosphorylation during p53-mediated growth arrest and apoptosis.

The G2 cell cycle checkpoint protects cells from potentially lethal mitotic entry after DNA damage. This checkpoint involves inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdc2 at the tyrosine-15 (Y15) position, mediated in part by the Wee1 protein kinase. Recent evidence suggests that p53 may accelerate mitotic entry after DNA damage and that the override of the G2 checkpoint may play a role in the induction of apoptosis by p53. To determine the biochemical mechanism by which p53 inactivates the G2 checkpoint, the effects of p53 activation on Wee1 expression, Cdc2-Y15 phosphorylation, and cyclin B1-associated Cdc2 kinase activity were examined. Under conditions of either growth arrest or apoptosis, p53 activation resulted in the down-regulation of Wee1 expression and dephosphorylation of Cdc2. A parallel increase in cyclin B1/Cdc2 kinase activity was observed during p53-mediated apoptosis. Negative regulation of the Wee1 expression and Cdc2 phosphorylation by p53 was also evident in thymus tissue from p53+/+ mice but not from p53-/- mice. Inactivation of the G2 checkpoint may contribute to the tumor suppressor activity of p53.

Animals↗