Determination of vertical dimension by biting force.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This study investigated the relation between periodontal condition and biting ability in a Chinese population using the pressure-detecting sheet. A total of 142 subjects residing in Nanchang, Jiangxi province, China, participated in the study. The examination included probing pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding on probing and coronal caries teeth. Biting abilities per person, biting force, biting pressure and occlusal contact area were measured using the sheet. Number of teeth present showed positive correlation with biting force and occlusal contact area, but were negatively correlated with biting pressure. No significant correlation was observed between the mean PD, percentage of pocket > or = 4 mm, bleeding index and any of biting abilities. The mean CAL showed a significantly negative correlation with biting force and occlusal contact area. Multiple stepwise regression analysis selected the number of teeth present, sex and age as the significant factors affecting the biting ability. However, no periodontal indices were picked up as the significantly contributing factor. There appears to be little effect of periodontal condition on biting ability. Ageing was selected as a contributing factor to reduction in the Chinese adults, but not in the Japanese population.
This study investigated the masticatory rehabilitation of subjects wearing different types of prostheses. Biting abilities per person (biting force, biting pressure and occlusal contact area) were assessed with a pressure detecting sheet (Prescale(R)). Five hundred and ninety volunteers were divided into four groups according to the type of posterior dentition: complete denture, removable partial denture, fixed partial denture, and full natural dentition groups. The biting forces of the fixed partial, removable partial and complete denture wearers were 80, 35 and 11% respectively, when expressed as a percentage of the subjects with a natural dentition. The complete denture wearers showed the highest biting pressure among the four groups, followed by the removable partial denture wearers. In a clinical intra-individual study, the biting abilities of 85 subjects, without (before insertion of) and with (after insertion of) renewed prostheses, were compared. No significant differences were found between biting before and immediately after insertion of the prostheses. However, the biting force and occlusal contact area increased 2 months after insertion of the prostheses. This study confirmed past clinical studies indicating an impaired masticatory function of denture wearers. The functional adaptation to new prostheses had improved at evaluation 2 months after insertion.
Monkeys were trained to produce a low, steady biting force for 0.5-2.5 s, and then a rapid forceful bite in response to a visual stimulus. After large bilateral lesions of the precentral face area, monkeys emitted repetitive forceful bites on the apparatus, but could not perform the force-holding task. They eventually relearned the task, but the force exerted was never as steady as it was prelesion, and often oscillated at about 2 and/or 5-6 Hz. After retraining, two animals with large bilateral lesions of the face area produced median RT responses equal to or only slightly longer than their prelesion performance, indicating that neural pathways not involving the precentral cortex can mediate quick visual RT responses. The variability of RTs was permanently increased, probably as a result of the persistent unsteadiness of the force-holding response. Incomplete bilateral lesions of the precentral face area, a complete unilateral lesion of that area, and bilateral lesions adjacent regions of cortex produced either mild, transient difficulties with the biting taks, or no problems at all. The results indicate that the precentral cortex has a role in the control of voluntary jaw movements. Lesions caused difficulty in controlling, but not producing, closing jaw movements, thereby suggesting that this role is predominantly to inhibit jaw-closing motoneurons or the systems that excite them. Electrical stimulation studies of the face area of the precentral cortex of the unanesthetized monkey point to the same conclusion.
OBJECTIVE: To assess occlusal balance of normal occlusion in intercuspal position with maximal bite force. METHODS: Maximal bite force was recorded in intercuspal position by use of T-Scan II system from 123 subjects with normal intact dentitions. Occlusal balance of normal occlusion was quantitatively analyzed from center of force, percentage of bite force, and occlusal contacts. RESULTS: The relative position of the center of bite force, the difference in bilateral force percentage, and unsymmetrical coefficient followed normal distributions. The 95% reference ranges for corresponding testing items were -6.60 to 6.68 mm, -15.50% to 12.10%, and 0.65 to 1.39. There was no statistic difference (P = 0.915) in occlusal contacts between left and right sides. The 98.4% of normal occlusion subjects had the center of bite force locating in posterior region of dentition when biting with maximal force in intercuspal position. CONCLUSIONS: Occlusal balance could be evaluated by T-Scan II system. Occlusion of normal subjects biting with maximal force was stable and bilaterally balanced in intercuspal position.
PURPOSE: Previous studies proposed to estimate masticatory forces from electromyograms (EMG) by substituting chewing activities of a particular muscle into bite force-activity relations obtained from isometric clenching. For biomechanical reasons, this method requires that ratios between muscle forces in chewing be the same as in clenching. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether this assumption is valid. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 32 asymptomatic subjects, EMGs of bilateral temporal and masseter muscles were registered in unilateral clenching on a bite fork and in chewing. Ratios of peak activities of different muscles were compared between the two biting tasks. RESULTS: In clenching, the working: balancing ratio of the masseters amounted to 0.92, while in chewing this ratio increased to 1.9. The working:balancing ratio of the temporalis was 1.8 in clenching and dropped to 1.3 in chewing. The temporalis:masseter ratio on the balancing side increased from 0.65 in clenching to 1.1 in chewing. CONCLUSION: The finding that ratios of muscle activities in chewing differed from corresponding ratios in clenching implies different combinations of muscle forces and/or different bite force-activity relations in the two biting tasks. In any of these cases, prediction of chewing force from the EMG of a particular muscle could lead to indefinite overestimations.
Single element foil strain gages were bonded to mandibular cortical bone in eight specimens of Galago crassicaudatus. The gage was bonded below the Pm4 or M2 adjacent to the lower border of the mandible. The bonded strain gage was connected to form one arm of a Wheatstone bridge. Following recovery from the general anesthetic, the restrained Galago bit either a piece of wood, a food object, or a bite force transducer. During these biting episodes, mandibular bone strain deformed the strain gage and the resulting change in electrical resistance of the gage caused voltage changes across the Wheatstone bridge. These changes, directly proportional to the amount of bone strain along the gage site, were recovered by a strip chart recorder. Bone strain was measured on both the working and balancing sides of the jaws. Maximum values of bone strain and bite force were 435 microstrain (compression) and 8.2 kilograms respectively. During bending of the mandible, the correlation between bone strain (tension or compression) and bite force ranged from -0.893 (tension) to 0.997 (compression). The experiments reported here demonstrate that only a small percentage of the Galago bite force is due to balancing side muscle force during isometric unilateral molar biting. In addition, these experiments demonstrate that the Galago mandible is bent in a predictable manner during biting. The amount of apparent mandibular bone strain is dependent on (1) the magnitude of the bite force and (2) the position of the bite point.
The aim of the present study was to investigate to what extent general factors (e.g. genotype, hormones) and factors at the craniofacial level (e.g. craniofacial size, jaw muscle architecture) contribute to the size and strength of the jaw muscles. A strong relationship of jaw muscle size and strength with that of other muscles would argue for general influences, whereas a weak relationship would argue for craniofacial influences. In 121 adult individuals, moments of maximal bite force, arm flexion force and leg extension force were measured. In addition, thicknesses of jaw muscles, arm flexor muscles and leg extensor muscles were measured using ultrasound. Relationships were assessed by using a principal component analysis. In females, one component was found in which all force moments were represented. Bite force moment, however, loaded very low. In males, two components were found. One component loaded for arm flexion and leg extension moments, the other loaded for bite force moments. In both females and males, only one component was found for the muscle thicknesses in which all muscle groups loaded similarly. It was concluded that the size of the jaw muscles was significantly related to the size of the limb muscles, suggesting that they were both subject to the same general influences. Maximal voluntary bite force moments were not significantly related to the moments of the arm flexion and leg extension forces, suggesting that besides the general influence on the muscle size, variation in bite force moment was also influenced by local variables, such as craniofacial morphology.
Due to large individual differences of masticatory function, an inter-individual comparison between denture patients and complete dentate people would be insufficient. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate patients' masticatory performance (determined by Mixing Ability Index, MAI) and bite force (determined by maximum bite force, MBF) after removable partial denture (RPD) treatment by comparing those of the RPD replaced side with those of their own opposite dentulous side, and to evaluate influence of bite force on masticatory performance in different dentitions. Subjects included patients with unilateral distal extension RPDs (n=28). Apart from the RPD replaced area on one-side, all subjects had intact dentitions. Both masticatory parameters were evaluated separately on each chewing side. MAls and MBFs obtained from the RPD replaced side (0.65 +/- 0.50 and 220 +/- 155 N, mean +/- SD) were significantly lower than those from the dentulous side (1.06 +/- 0.64 and 450 +/- 268 N; Wilcoxon signed-ranks, P < 0.001). MBF significantly influenced MAI in both RPD replaced (Univariate linear regression; R2 = 0.17, P < -0.001) and dentulous sides (R2 = 0.51, P < 0.001). After RPD treatment, masticatory performance and bite force of RPD replaced side were lower than those of their own dentulous side. The influence of the bite force on masticatory performance in RPD replaced side was less significant than that in the dentulous side.
A group of 35 90-year old subjects, randomly selected from the gerontologic population study in Göteborg (H-70), were examined with respect to function and dysfunction of the masticatory system. The methods included a questionnaire, clinical examination and recording of bite force endurance and maximal bite force, measured in the central incisor region. Forty percent were edentulous, 29% were partially edentulous and wore a removable denture, while the others were dentate without removable prostheses. Signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders were mostly mild and infrequent, except TMJ crepitation which was recorded in 69% of the subjects. Maximal bite force was in general low (mean 94 N) but showed a great individual variation (range 10 to 410 N). Bite force endurance was also very variable (mean 72 s, range 10 to 205 s). None of the 35 subjects reported poor masticatory ability, but 2 said they could not chew all kinds of food. In spite of a reduced bite force this group of 90-year olds considered their masticatory ability as good and most of them had no severe signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders.
Muscle forces determine joint loads, but the objectives governing the mix of muscle forces involved are unknown. This study tested the hypothesis that masticatory muscle forces exerted during static biting are consistent with objectives of minimization of joint loads (MJL) or muscle effort (MME). To do this, we compared numerical model predictions with data measured from six subjects. Biting tasks which produced moments on molar and incisor teeth were modeled based on MJL or MME. The slope of predicted vs. electromyographic (EMG) data for an individual was compared with a perfect match slope of 1.00. Predictions based on MME matched best with EMG activity for molar biting (slopes, 0.89-1.16). Predictions from either or both models matched EMG results for incisor biting (best-match slopes, 0.95-1.07). Muscle forces during isometric biting appear to be consistent with objectives of MJL or MME, depending on the individual, biting location, and moment.
Force transmission onto implants supporting overdentures was measured in vivo by means of piezoelectric transducers that allow for simultaneous force registrations in 3 dimensions. The transducers are directly mounted onto the implants, beneath the anchorage device. The force registrations were analyzed with regard to the anchorage device and retention mechanism of overdenture support. The 3 types of denture anchorage were a U-shaped bar, a round clip-bar and single telescopes. Forces were measured in the following test situations: maximum force when biting in centric occlusion, maximum bite force during biting on a bite plate, grinding and chewing bread. Multiple regression showed that the vertical component of maximum forces was dependent on the anchorage device and test situation. The transverse components reached 10 to 50% of the vertical force magnitude. With the bite plate in situ maximum forces measured in vertical direction were significantly higher or the ipsilateral implant with telescopes than with bars (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001). Chewing and grinding resulted in lower vertical forces compared to maximum biting. In transverse dimensions, mainly in the anterior-posterior direction, registered forces reached magnitudes that resembled the vertical component (50 to 100%). Force magnitudes of chewing and grinding were similar for all three anchorage devices. However, differences were observed between bars and telescopes with regard to the direction of transverse force components. The results of this study do not suggest the preference of one specific anchorage system or retention mechanism for overdenture support. However, rigid bars contribute to load sharing and stress distribution onto the implants.
Anthropoids and tarsiers are distinguished from all other vertebrates by the possession of a postorbital septum, which is formed by the frontal, alisphenoid, and zygomatic bones. Cartmill [(1980) In: Evolutionary Biology of the New World Monkeys and Continental Drift. New York: Plenum, p 243-274] suggested that the postorbital septum evolved in the stem lineage of tarsiers and anthropoids to insulate the eye from movements arising in the temporal fossa. Ross [(1996) Am J Phys Anthropol 91:305-324] suggested that the septum insulates the orbital contents from incursions by the line of action of the anterior temporal muscles caused by the unique combination of high degrees of orbital frontation and convergence. Both of these hypotheses must explain why insulation of the orbital contents could not be achieved by decreasing the size of the anterior temporal musculature with a corresponding increase in size of the remaining jaw adductors, rather than evolving a postorbital septum. One possibility is that the anterior temporalis is an important contributor to vertically directed bite forces during all biting and chewing activities. Another possibility is that reduction in anterior temporal musculature would compromise the ability to produce powerful bite forces, either at the incisors or along the postcanine toothrow. To evaluate these hypotheses, electromyographic (EMG) recordings were made from the masseter muscle and the anterior and posterior portions of the temporalis muscles of two owl monkeys, Aotus trivirgatus. The EMG data indicate that anterior temporalis activity relative to that of the superficial masseter is lower during incision than mastication. In addition, activity of the anterior temporalis is not consistently higher than the posterior temporalis during incision. The data indicate relatively greater activity of anterior temporalis compared to other muscles during isometric biting on the postcanine toothrow. This may be due to decreased activity in superficial masseter and posterior temporalis, rather than elevated anterior temporalis activity. The anterior temporalis is not consistently less variable in activity than the superficial masseter and posterior temporalis. The EMG data gathered here indicate no reason for suggesting that the anterior temporal muscles in anthropoids are utilized especially for incisal preparation of hard fruits. Maintenance of relatively high EMG activity in anterior temporalis across a wide range of biting behaviors is to be expected in a vertically oriented and rostrally positioned muscle such as this because, compared to the posterior temporalis, superficial masseter and medial pterygoid, it can contribute relatively larger vertical components of force to bites along the postcanine toothrow. The in vivo data do not support this hypothesis, possibly because of effects of bite point and bite force orientation.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether the amplitude distribution of electromyographic activity (EMG) in terms of muscular load revealed any differences between patients with painful masseter muscles and referents during the chewing of an almond and of gum. The relative masticatory forces of the masseter muscle and the anterior temporal muscle during chewing were calculated by a transformation of the muscular load levels of EMG activity (microV) to load levels of relative masticatory force (%RVC). This was done by regression in reverse of an isometric reference voluntary contraction (RVC) for EMG versus bite force biting on a bite-force sensor. The maximal bite-force values for patients and referents were similar. The relative masticatory force for chewing an almond was higher than that for gum-chewing. The peaks of the relative masticatory forces were similar for both patients and referents. During the chewing of an almond the relative masticatory forces of the masseter muscle below the peak load were higher for patients than referents. During gum-chewing the patients used higher forces than referents for 70% of the total chewing time analysed. This also applied to the anterior temporal muscle when chewing an almond. Estimates of the peak masticatory forces were calculated in newtons.
The design of dental superstructures influences the loading on dental implants and the deformation of the anterior interforaminal bone in an edentulous mandible. This deformation causes stress in the bone around the implants and may lead to bone resorption and loss of the implant. The stress distribution around dental implants in an edentulous mandible was calculated by means of a three-dimensional, finite-element model of an entire lower jaw. This model was built from data obtained from slices of a single human mandible and was provided with two endosseous implants in the interforaminal region. The implants were either connected with a bar or remained solitary, and were loaded with a horizontal bite force of 10 N, a vertical bite force of 35 N, or an oblique bite force of 70 N. The most extreme principal stresses in the bone were always located around the neck of the implant. Stress around the implant was, therefore, not only caused by the local deformation of the bone due to movement of the implant and interface relative to the surrounding bone but also by the bending of the mandible. The most extreme principal stress was found with oblique bite forces. The highest maximum and lowest minimum principal stresses were 7.4 and -16.2 MPa in the model without the bar and 6.5 and -16.5 MPa in the model with the bar. When differences in the amount of bite force were eliminated, the vertical bite force resulted in the lowest stress.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
The complex, pennate architecture of the human masseter muscle points to a functional division into more than the commonly distinguished deep and superficial parts. In this study, the possible existence of regional differences in activation was examined. EMG activity was registered in three deep and three superficial regions with the use of bipolar fine-wire electrodes. Recordings were made during different static bite tasks, in specified directions, and with a specified bite-force magnitude. A linear bite-force/EMG relationship was observed. Furthermore, it appeared that muscle regions showed a different pattern of change in activity as a function of bite-force direction. Heterogeneity was nearly absent in anteriorly-, anteriomedially-, and medially-directed bites, but became increasingly obvious in the other bite-force directions. The posterior deep region showed the most aberrant activation pattern, which was almost opposite that from the other regions. This part was fully active in posterolaterally-directed bites. The posterior superficial region showed the largest variability in activity as a function of bite-force direction. The results point to a functional partition of the masseter muscle in at least three parts: anterior deep, posterior deep, and superficial. A further subdivision of the superficial portion might be present, but was not as obvious as the division of the deep masseter.