Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “BREAST”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources

Estrogen receptor status of primary breast cancer is predictive of estrogen receptor status of contralateral breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen reduces the risk for contralateral breast cancer by approximately 30%-50%, with benefits probably limited to women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive primary disease. In a retrospective analysis of data from National Surgical and Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trials B-18, B-22, and B-25, we determined whether the ER status of primary breast cancer predicts the ER status of a subsequent contralateral breast cancer and whether tamoxifen treatment affects this relationship. In these trials, tamoxifen at 20 mg/day had been administered only to women aged 50 years or older, rather than to those determined by the ER status of their primary tumor, allowing an assessment of the treatment's effects in ER-negative disease. METHODS: Among the 5513 eligible patients, 176 patients developed a contralateral breast cancer. The ER status of the primary and contralateral tumor was determined and cross-classified for women who did not receive tamoxifen (i.e., those aged 49 years or younger) and for women who did (i.e., those aged 50 years or older). ER data were available for 110 evaluable invasive contralateral breast cancers. RESULTS: Among patients who did not receive tamoxifen (n = 62), 89% with an ER-positive primary cancer had an ER-positive contralateral breast cancer and 70% with an ER-negative primary breast cancer had an ER-negative contralateral breast cancer (odds ratio for the association between primary and contralateral ER status = 14.8, 95% confidence interval = 3.8 to 74.3; P<.001). Among patients who received tamoxifen (n = 48), 56% with an ER-positive primary cancer had an ER-positive contralateral breast cancer and 78% with an ER-negative primary cancer had an ER-negative contralateral breast cancer (odds ratio = 3.4, 95% confidence interval = 0.53 to 39.2; P =.25). CONCLUSION: The ER status of the primary breast cancer was associated with that of the contralateral breast for patients not receiving tamoxifen. Patients with an ER-positive primary cancer who received tamoxifen had a lower concordance rate with fewer ER-positive contralateral breast cancers, which may be a result of tamoxifen treatment.

Age Factors↗

Complementary role of adjunctive breast magnetic resonance imaging and scintimammography in patients of all ages undergoing breast cancer surgery.

The aims of this study were to assess breast MRI and scintimammography (SMM) for the detection of breast cancer, and to determine any complementary role of these tests to each other and conventional imaging. Seventy-two patients (age 35-81 years) with a suspicious breast mass were investigated by mammography, breast ultrasound, breast MRI and SMM before undergoing surgical excision of the breast mass. Sensitivity, specificity and area under receiver operator characteristic curves were calculated for each test. Of the 72 patients, there were 66 proven malignant tumours, including two patients with bilateral breast cancer. When comparing the diagnostic sensitivity of breast MRI and SMM for lesion size, both tests showed higher sensitivities for lesions >25 mm in size, particularly for SMM. When these tests were compared for patient age, patients less than 51 years showed higher sensitivities for both tests. This was statistically significant for breast MRI. The overall respective diagnostic sensitivities for mammography, mammography with breast ultrasound, breast MRI and SMM were 56, 67, 86 and 85%. The differences were significant between mammography, mammography/ultrasound and both breast MRI and SMM. Breast MRI and SMM offer incremental diagnostic advantage in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Although improved diagnostic accuracy is seen in patients of all ages, those patients less than 51 years of age receive the greatest diagnostic benefit.

Adult↗

Association between mammographic breast density and breast cancer tumor characteristics.

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have examined the association between breast density and breast cancer tumor characteristics. We examined the association between hormonal, proliferative, and histologic tumor characteristics and mammographic breast density in women with breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis in 546 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer to evaluate the associations between breast density and tumor size, lymph node status, lymphatic or vascular invasion, histologic grade, nuclear grade, tumor differentiation, mitotic index, tumor necrosis, Ki-67 proliferation, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, p53, p27, cyclin E, Bcl-2, and C-erb-B2 invasion. Breast density was classified as fatty (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System code 1 or 2; n = 373) or dense (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System code 3 or 4; n = 173) for the cancer-free breast. A single pathologist measured all tumor markers. We examined whether the relationships were modified by interval cancer or screen-detected cancer. RESULTS: Women with a tumor size >1.0 cm were more likely to have dense breasts compared with women with a tumor size < or =1.0 cm after adjusting for confounders (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.4 for tumor sizes 1.1-2.0 cm; odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-4.4 for tumor sizes 2.1-10 cm). Tumor size, lymph node status, and lymphatic or vascular invasion were positively associated with breast density among screen-detected cancers. Histologic grade and mitotic index were negatively associated with breast density in women diagnosed with an interval cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that breast density is related to tumor size, lymph node status, and lymphatic or vascular invasion in screen-detected cancers. Additional studies are needed to address whether these associations are due to density masking the detection of some tumors, a biological relationship, or both.

Aged↗

Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-II serum concentrations in patients with benign and malignant breast lesions: free IGF-II is correlated with breast cancer size.

PURPOSE: Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) are potent mitogens for breast cancer cells in vitro, and elevated IGF-I serum levels are a risk factor for breast malignancies. This study evaluated IGF-I and IGF-II serum levels in healthy women and in patients with benign and malignant breast lesions and correlated them with tumor size. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Serum levels of the total and unbound fractions of IGF-I and IGF-II were analyzed in 65 patients with benign and malignant breast lesions and in 38 women without breast disease. ELISAs were used to detect serum IGF levels, with (total IGF) or without (free IGF) prior acid-ethanol extraction. RESULTS: Total IGF-I serum concentrations were lower in healthy women than in breast cancer patients (P < 0.001) or patients with benign breast lesions (P = 0.010), but no differences were observed in free IGF-I levels. Conversely, healthy women had higher serum levels of free IGF-II than women with breast lesions (P = 0.003), and the free/total IGF-II ratio was significantly reduced in patients with breast disease (P = 0.001). Although IGF-I or IGF-II serum concentrations of breast cancer patients were similar to those of patients with benign lesions, the size of a malignant tumor was correlated to the ratio free/total IGF-II (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Malignant breast tumors cannot be distinguished from benign breast lesions by systemic IGF serum levels. However, women with breast lesions have decreased IGF-II concentrations, and free IGF-II levels are clearly correlated to the size of a breast cancer, indicating an involvement in tumor growth.

Adult↗

The role of the breast care nurse during treatment for early breast cancer: the patient's perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Women who are diagnosed with breast cancer require the support of a range of people during their treatment. Although the role of the breast care nurse in providing support has recently been investigated in several Australian studies the patients' perspective on the role of the breast care nurse in Australian hospitals has not previously been described in detail. The aim of this paper is to explore patients' perspectives on the role of the breast care nurse. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted with 18 women who had completed treatment for early breast cancer. The women were asked to describe their experiences from the time of diagnosis through to treatment completion. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. FINDINGS: Breast cancer patients repeatedly emphasised the importance of the role of their breast care nurses throughout their experience of breast cancer. The support that breast care nurses provided incorporated the following components: communication, rapport and an awareness of the women's needs, availability, reassurance and practical information. CONCLUSION: This study provides an understanding of women's perspectives on the role of breast care nurses and confirms that breast care nurses play an important support role during the experience of early breast cancer. Oncology clinics should focus on ensuring that all women who are diagnosed with breast cancer have adequate access to the support that breast care nurses are able to provide.

Adult↗

Radial scars in benign breast-biopsy specimens and the risk of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Radial scars are benign breast lesions of uncertain clinical significance. In particular, it is not known whether these lesions alter the risk of breast cancer in women with benign breast disease. We conducted a case-control study of women who had benign breast lesions with or without radial scars. METHODS: We reviewed benign breast-biopsy specimens from 1396 women enrolled in the Nurses' Health Study, including 255 women in whom breast cancer subsequently developed and 1141 women without subsequent breast cancer (controls). The controls were matched to the women with subsequent breast cancer according to age and the year when the benign lesion was identified. The median follow-up after biopsy of the benign lesions was 12 years. RESULTS: Radial scars were identified in biopsy specimens from 99 women (7.1 percent). Most biopsy specimens with radial scars had only one radial scar (60.6 percent), and they tended to be incidental microscopical findings (median size, 4.0 mm). The women with radial scars had a risk of breast cancer that was almost twice the risk of the women without scars, regardless of the histologic type of benign breast disease (relative risk, 1.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.9). Among women who had proliferative disease without atypia as compared with women who had nonproliferative disease, the relative risk of breast cancer was 3.0 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.7 to 5.5) for those with radial scars and 1.5 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.1) for those without radial scars. Among women with atypical hyperplasia as compared with women with nonproliferative disease, the relative risk of breast cancer was 5.8 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.7 to 12.7) for those with radial scars and 3.8 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.4 to 5.9) for those without radial scars. CONCLUSIONS: Radial scars are an independent histologic risk factor for breast cancer.

Adult↗

Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications.

A retrospective review was performed of one surgeon's experience with 40 consecutive patients who had undergone two-stage saline-filled implant breast reconstruction and radiation during the period from 1990 through 1997. A randomly selected group of 40 other two-stage saline-filled implant breast reconstructions from the same surgeon and time period served as controls. This review was undertaken because of the absence of specific information on the outcome of staged saline implant reconstructions in the radiated breast. Previously published reports on silicone gel implants and radiation have been contradictory. At the same time, the criteria for the use of radiation in the treatment of breast cancer have been expanded and the numbers of reconstruction patients who have been radiated are increasing dramatically. For example, in a 1985 report on immediate breast reconstruction, only 1 of 185 patients over a 6-year period underwent adjuvant radiation therapy, whereas in this review, there were 40 radiated breasts with saline-filled implants, 19 of which received adjuvant radiation therapy during their expansion. The study parameters included patient age, breast cup size, implant size, length of follow-up, number of procedures, coincident flap operations, Baker classification, complications, opposite breast procedures, pathologic stage, indications for and details about the radiation, and outcomes. The use of radiation in this review of reconstructed breasts can logically be divided into four groups: previous lumpectomy and radiation (n = 7), mastectomy and radiation before reconstruction (n = 9), mastectomy and adjuvant radiation during reconstruction/expansion (n = 19), and radiation after reconstruction (n = 5). The largest and most rapidly growing group of patients is of those receiving postmastectomy adjuvant radiation therapy. A total of 47.5 percent (19 of 40) of radiated breasts with saline implants ultimately needed the addition of, or replacement by, a flap. Ten percent of a control group with nonradiated saline implant reconstructions also had flaps, none as replacements. Fifty percent or more of both the radiated and control groups had contralateral surgery. Complications were far more common in the radiated group; for example, there were 32.5 percent capsular contractures compared with none in the control group. The control nonradiated implant-only group and the flap plus implant radiated group did well cosmetically. The radiated implant-only group was judged the worst. The increasing use of radiation after mastectomy has important implications for breast reconstruction. The possibility for radiation should be thoroughly investigated and anticipated preoperatively before immediate breast reconstruction. Patients with invasive disease, particularly with large tumors or palpable axillary lymph nodes, are especially likely to be encouraged to undergo postmastectomy radiation therapy. The indications for adjuvant radiation therapy have included four or more positive axillary lymph nodes, tumors 4 cm (or more) in diameter, and tumors at or near the margin of resection. More recently, some centers are recommending adjuvant radiation therapy for patients with as few as one positive lymph node or even in situ carcinoma close to the resection margin. The use of latissimus dorsi flaps after radiation has proven to be an excellent solution to postradiation tissue contracture, which can occur during breast expander reconstruction. The use of the latissimus flap electively with skin-sparing mastectomy preradiation is probably unwise, unless postmastectomy radiation is unlikely. Skin-sparing mastectomy with a latissimus flap thus should be preserved for patients unlikely to undergo adjuvant radiation therapy. Purely autologous reconstruction such as a TRAM flap is another option for these patients, either before or after radiation therapy.

Adult↗

Relationship between mammographic breast density and tamoxifen in women with breast cancer.

Previous studies have reported that tamoxifen use is associated with a decrease in mammographic breast density. This is a potentially valuable finding since mammographic sensitivity is limited by breast density. Anything that reduces breast density would theoretically enhance the sensitivity of mammography for the detection of breast cancer in women at an earlier stage when it is more curable. We performed a retrospective study investigating the potential effect of tamoxifen on breast density. The data for this retrospective study were collected from the records of 52 charts from a single medical oncologist. Patients with breast cancer were selected regardless of stage or age at the time of diagnosis or treatment, as long as their charts had records of bilateral mammograms. For each breast on each woman, both mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal views were reviewed independently by two radiologists on two separate occasions to obtain inter- and intraobserver variability. Two methods of classifying breast density were used: the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), and measurements of percent density. Only age and menopausal status were found to be associated with breast density. There was no correlation between breast density and tamoxifen use (past or present). Our study shows no association between tamoxifen use and breast density. We confirm previous observations that breast density is inversely correlated with age and postmenopausal status.

Adult↗

Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast ultrasonography (US) as an adjunct examination to mammography in asymptomatic women with dense (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] density category 3 or 4) breast tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 1998 and April 2000, 1,862 patients with negative findings at clinical examinations, negative mammographic results, and breast tissue with BI-RADS category 3 or 4 density were evaluated with bilateral whole-breast US for occult cystic and solid masses, areas of architectural distortion, and acoustic shadowing. Suggestive findings were compared with tissue diagnoses from US-guided core biopsy specimens. US was initially performed by a US or a mammography technologist. The average time to perform the examination was approximately 10 minutes. Abnormal findings were corroborated by a fellowship-trained breast-imaging radiologist. RESULTS: In the 1,862 women examined with bilateral whole-breast US, 57 biopsies were recommended in 56 patients; follow-up data were available in 51 of the 56 patients. Six breast cancers were detected (cancer detection rate, 0.3%). CONCLUSION: Bilateral whole-breast US, when performed in patients with dense (BI-RADS category 3 or 4 density) breast tissue, is useful in detecting breast cancer not discovered with mammography or clinical breast examination. The 0.3% cancer detection rate compares favorably with that of screening mammography and with that in previously published studies involving bilateral whole-breast US.

Adult↗

Cosmetic saline breast implants: a survey of satisfaction, breast-feeding experience, cancer screening, and health.

Saline breast implants have been used for the past 30 years for cosmetic and reconstructive purposes. Data based on a large number of patients are needed to evaluate patient satisfaction, cancer screening practices, problems associated with breast-feeding, and health effects. We conducted a follow-up study of 292 cosmetic saline breast implant patients from Texas and Louisiana who consented to a telephone interview. Using a Likert scale, we measured the patients' degree of satisfaction with the implants. The results indicated that 80.5 percent were satisfied, 73.3 percent would recommend saline breast implants to others, and 65.1 percent felt that implants improved their quality of life. The extent of satisfaction was independent of the number of additional surgeries, age at implant, and follow-up time. Mammography use and breast self-examination were reported with high frequency in this survey. Ninety-one percent of study participants who were between 40 and 49 years of age at time of interview and 94 percent of those 50 or older reported having had at least one mammogram. Breast self-examination was practiced by 75 percent of the women, and 61 percent reported checking their breasts at least once a month. Of the 46 women who had children after augmentation, 28 reported breast-feeding and 8 (28.6 percent) reported having implant-related problems. The patients were asked to provide information regarding a series of conditions for which they sought medical attention. They reported: atypical rheumatoid syndrome (n = 1), Sjögren syndrome (n = 1), atypical autoimmune disorder (n = 1), and chronic fatigue syndrome (n = 2). Overall, women who elected to have saline breast implants were satisfied with their augmentations, had mammograms and performed breast self-examinations more often than nonaugmented women. A few had problems when breast-feeding that could be related to their implants. There were no reports of breast cancer, but five women reported autoimmune conditions.

Adolescent↗

Systematic characterisation of GABRP expression in sporadic breast cancer and normal breast tissue.

The GABRP gene has been previously identified by in silico analysis of four million ESTs as a candidate gene differentially expressed in breast cancer. GABRP is located on chromosome 5q34 and it encodes the pi-subunit of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor, a transmembrane protein expressed in the brain and several nonneuronal tissues. Using cDNA dot blot hybridisation (cancer profiling array), quantitative RT-PCR and non-radioisotopic in situ hybridisation (ISH), we have analysed GABRP expression in breast cancer and normal breast tissues as well as in nontumorigenic and tumorigenic breast cell lines. Analysis of the cancer profiling array revealed a more than 2-fold downregulation of GABRP (p < 0.001) in 76% of primary breast carcinomas (n = 50) compared to corresponding normal tissues. Quantitative RT-PCR in a panel of 23 normal human tissues showed that the GABRP expression level was most abundant in the normal breast tissues compared to other human tissues. GABRP downregulation in breast cancer was confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR in cryopreserved breast tumour and normal breast tissue specimens (n = 22), in archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens (n = 32), as well as in breast cancer cell lines (n = 8). Furthermore, a significant downregulation of GABRP was noted in large (pT3-pT4) (p = 0.044) primary breast tumours. Non-radioisotopic ISH showed strong GABRP expression in normal epithelial and benign papilloma breast cells, but no signal could be detected in invasive ductal carcinoma. Altogether, these data suggest that GABRP is progressively down-regulated with tumour-progression, and that it may be useful as a prognostic marker in breast cancer.

Breast↗

Breast cancer risk factors and mammographic breast density in women over age 70.

BACKGROUND: Breast density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer, but little is known about factors associated with breast density in women over 70. METHODS: Percent breast density, sex hormone levels and breast cancer risk factor data were obtained on 239 women ages 70-92 recruited from 1986 to 1988 in the United States. Multivariable linear regression was used to develop a model to describe factors associated with percent density. RESULTS: Median (range) percent density among women was 23.7% (0-85%). Body mass index (beta=-0.345, p<0.001 adjusted for age and parity) and parity (beta=-0.277, p<0.001 adjusted for age and BMI) were significantly and inversely associated with percent breast density. After adjusting for parity and BMI, age was not associated with breast density (beta=0.05, p=0.45). Parous women had lower percent density than nulliparous women (23.7 versus 34.7%, p=0.005). Women who had undergone surgical menopause had greater breast density than those who had had a natural menopause (33.4 versus 24.8%, p=0.048), as did women who were not current smokers (26.0 versus 17.3% for smokers, p=0.02). Breast density was not associated with age at menarche, age at menopause, age at first birth, breastfeeding, estrogen levels or androgen levels. In a multivariable model, 24% of the variance in percent breast density was explained by BMI (beta=-0.35), parity (beta=-0.29), surgical menopause (beta=0.13) and current smoking (beta=-0.12). CONCLUSION: Factors associated with breast density in older, post-menopausal women differ from traditional breast cancer risk factors and from factors associated with breast density in pre-menopausal and younger post-menopausal women.

Aged↗

Prone breast radiotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: a preliminary analysis.

PURPOSE: Women with large breasts have marked dose inhomogeneity and often an inferior cosmetic outcome when treated with breast conservation compared to smaller-sized patients. We designed a prone breast board, which both minimizes breast separation and irradiated lung or heart volume. We report feasibility, cosmesis, and preliminary local control and survival for selected women with Stage 0-II breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients with clinical Stage 0-II breast cancer were treated with lumpectomy and breast irradiation utilizing a prototype prone breast board. A total of 59 breasts were treated. Indications for treatment in the prone position were large or pendulous breast size (n = 57), or a history of cardiopulmonary disease (n = 2). The median bra size was 41D (range, 34D-44EE). Cosmesis was evaluated on a 1-10 (worst-to-best) scale. RESULTS: Acute toxicity included skin erythema (80% of patients experienced Grade I or Grade II erythema), breast edema (72% of patients experienced mild edema), pruritus (20% of patients), and fatigue (20% of patients reported mild fatigue). One patient required a treatment break. The only late toxicity was related to long-term cosmesis. The mean overall cosmesis score for 53 patients was 9.37 (range, 8-10). Actuarial 3- and 5-year local control rates are 98%. Actuarial overall survival at 3 and 5 years are 98% and 94%. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that treating selected women with prone breast radiotherapy is feasible and tolerated. The approach results in excellent cosmesis, and short-term outcome is comparable to traditional treatment techniques. This technique offers an innovative alternative to women who might not otherwise be considered candidates for breast conservation.

Adult↗

Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: masking bias or causality?

Masking bias is hypothesized to explain associations between breast density and breast cancer risk. Tumours in dense breasts may be concealed at the initial examination, but manifest themselves in later years, suggesting an increase in breast cancer incidence. We studied the association between breast density and breast cancer risk in 0, 1-2, 3-4 and 5-6 year periods between initial examination and diagnosis. We studied 359 cases and 922 referents, identified in a breast cancer screening programme in Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Breast density was assessed at the initial examination and classified as 'dense' (if > 25% of the breast was composed of density) or 'lucent' (< or = 25% density). In women examined with mid-1970s film screen mammography, we found that at time 0 the odds ratio (OR) for women with dense breasts compared to those with lucent breasts was 1.4 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7-6.2). After a 3-4 year period the risk was increased to 3.3 (95% CI: 1.5-7.1). Then, the risk decreased again (OR: 1.2, 95% CI: 0.6-2.7). This rise and decline in risk are in accordance with the masking hypothesis. The observation, however, that the risk at time 0 does not appear to be lower for women with dense breasts than for those with lucent breasts, seems to be inconsistent with the masking hypothesis and may be indicative of causality. The same analysis were performed in women whose initial screening examination was done with current high-quality mammography. Due to the small size of this study group no firm conclusions could be drawn, but it seems as if masking bias could still play a role with high-quality mammography.

Adult↗

Breast-feeding and breast cancer in the offspring.

The causation of breast cancer in certain strains of mice by a virus that can be transmitted vertically, through the milk produced during lactation, has led to the hypothesis that a similar phenomenon could exist in humans. There have been laboratory-based studies in humans suggesting that a virus may be involved in the etiology of female breast cancer although other investigations did not support this hypothesis. Descriptive data and epidemiologic evidence of ecologic nature do not indicate a role of lactation in the causation of human breast cancer, but the hypothesis has not been adequately assessed in analytic epidemiologic studies. A nested case-control study undertaken in Sweden to examine the role of prenatal factors on breast cancer risk in the offspring, allowed the evaluation of the importance of breast-feeding in the causation of this disease. Standardised records concerning women born at the Uppsala University Hospital from 1874 to 1954 were linked with invasive breast cancer incident cases, identified through their unique national registration number in the Swedish Cancer Registry during 1958-1990. For each case with breast cancer, the females born to the first three mothers admitted after the case's mother were selected as potential matching controls. Only controls living in Sweden and free from breast cancer until the time of diagnosis of breast cancer in the corresponding case were eventually included in the study. The analysis was based on 458 cases of breast cancer born in singleton pregnancies and 1,197 singleton age- and birth date-matched controls. Breast-feeding was not a significant or suggestive risk factor for breast cancer in the offspring; compared to women who at discharge were wholly or partly breastfed, women who as newborn were not breastfed had a relative risk of breast cancer of 0.97 with 95% confidence interval 0.44-2.17 (P = 0.95).

Breast Feeding↗

Comparison of technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile scintimammography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of breast cancer in patients with mammographically dense breast.

The main purpose of this study was to compare the utility of technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile (Tc-99m sestamibi) scintimammography with that of ultrasonography for diagnosis of breast cancer in 32 female patients with indeterminate mammographic probability of malignancy because of mammographically dense breast. All breast masses were removed and histopathological diagnosis was obtained in all cases. The results showed 20 of 24 cases of breast carcinoma detected on Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography. Only one out of eight patients with benign breast lesion had abnormal scintimammographic finding. Ultrasonography diagnosed 22 of the 24 cases of breast carcinoma. However, five out of eight patients with benign breast lesion had positive ultrasonographic findings. In differentiating malignant and benign breast tumors in mammographically dense breast, the diagnostic sensitivities were 83 and 92%, specificities were 88 and 38%, and accuracies were 84 and 78% for Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography and ultrasonography, respectively. Ultrasonography showed a nonsignificantly higher sensitivity (p < 0.05), but lower specificity, with more false-positive diagnoses made on ultrasonography. Due to its higher sensitivity, ultrasonography is more suitable for screening breast masses. However, Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography exhibited significantly higher specificity (p < 0.05) and accuracy in detecting malignant breast tumors in the current study. We conclude that Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography is a safe and useful diagnostic method for detection of breast cancer in patients with nondiagnostic mammogram because of mammographically dense breast.

Adult↗

Radiation-induced breast cancer: long-term follow-up of radiation therapy for benign breast disease.

BACKGROUND: From the 1920s through the 1950s, radiation therapy was used in Sweden as a treatment for benign breast diseases. It is now known that exposure of the breast to ionizing radiation increases the relative risk of subsequent breast cancer, especially for younger women. However, the degree to which the patient's age contributes to the elevation of risk for subsequent development of breast cancer is not yet completely understood. PURPOSE: The purpose was to study the risk of breast cancer after irradiation of the female breast and, in particular, to analyze the duration of the effect and the risk for women older than 40 years at first exposure. METHODS: In this cohort study, data were obtained through population-based registers. The exposed group consisted of 1216 women (median age, 40 years) who, during the period spanning 1925 through 1954, received radiation therapy for benign breast disease. The reference group consisted of 1874 women (median age, 36 years) who had the same diagnosis during that time period but did not receive radiation therapy. The radiation doses were determined from the original medical records (mean dose, 5.8 Gy; range, 0.003-50.1 Gy). The follow-up lasted up to 60 years after first exposure. The incidence rate ratio was analyzed with Poisson regression models. RESULTS: The total number of breast cancers in the exposed cohort was 198 versus 101 in the unexposed cohort. Overall, the radiation-associated incidence rate ratio was 3.58 (95% confidence interval = 2.77-4.63). The dose-response gradient was statistically significant (P < .001) but leveled off at higher doses. The incidence rate ratios decreased starting about 25 years after first exposure but were at increased levels throughout the entire follow-up period. The incidence rate ratio decreased with age at first exposure but was significantly increased (P < .001) even when the age at time of first exposure was greater than 40 years. CONCLUSIONS: Total dose, age at first exposure, and time since first exposure were all determinants of the incidence rate ratio of breast cancer after exposure of the breast to ionizing radiation. A statistically significant increase in the incidence of breast cancer following radiation treatment of various benign breast diseases was observed even among women older than 40 years at the time of first treatment. IMPLICATIONS: These findings need to be considered when weighing the relative benefits versus risks of generalized screening of younger women for breast cancer by mammography.

Adult↗

Mammographic breast density and family history of breast cancer.

The association between mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk may be the result of genetic and/or environmental factors that determine breast density. We reasoned that if the genetic factors that underlie breast density increase breast cancer risk, then breast density should be associated with family history of breast cancer. Therefore, we determined the association between mammographic density and family history of breast cancer among women in the San Francisco Mammography Registry. Mammographic density was classified using the four BI-RADS criteria: 1 = almost entirely fatty, 2 = scattered fibroglandular tissue, 3 = heterogeneously dense, and 4 = extremely dense. We adjusted for age, body mass index, hormone replacement therapy use, menopause status, and personal history of breast cancer. Compared with women with BI-RADS 1 readings, women with higher breast density were more likely to have first-degree relatives with breast cancer (BI-RADS 2, odds ratio [OR] = 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.96 to 1.89; BI-RADS 3, OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.19 to 2.40; BI-RADS 4, OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.05 to 2.71). Thus, the genetic factors that determine breast density may determine breast cancer risk.

Adipose Tissue↗