SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “clinical trial”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of a Single-Pill Triple Combination of Valsartan, Amlodipine, and Chlorthalidone in Patients With Essential Hypertension Inadequately Controlled on Dual Therapy With Valsartan and Amlodipine: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase 3 Trial.

Many hypertensive patients require three or more antihypertensive agents to achieve target blood pressure. This randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 3 trial conducted in South Korea evaluated the efficacy and safety of a single-pill triple combination therapy with valsartan (Val), amlodipine (Aml), and chlorthalidone (CTD) in patients whose blood pressure remained inadequately controlled on Val/Aml dual therapy. Patients uncontrolled after 4 weeks of Val/Aml 80/5 mg were randomized 1:1 to either Val/Aml/CTD 80/5/12.5 mg or Val/Aml 80/5 mg using a double-dummy design. After 2 weeks, doses were escalated to Val/Aml/CTD 160/5/25 mg or Val/Aml 160/5 mg, respectively, for a total treatment duration of 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) from baseline to week 8. Of 193 randomized patients, 178 completed the study. The least squares mean ± SE change in MSSBP was -19.70 ± 1.31 mmHg in the Val/Aml/CTD group versus -8.71 ± 1.26 mmHg in the control group, yielding a statistically significant between-group difference of -10.99 ± 1.81 mmHg (95% CI, -14.56 to -7.41; p < 0.0001). No serious adverse events occurred in the Val/Aml/CTD group, compared with an incidence of 1.98% in the control group (p = 0.4985). Triple combination therapy with Val/Aml/CTD demonstrated superior blood pressure reduction and a favorable safety profile in patients with essential hypertension inadequately controlled on Val/Aml dual therapy, supporting its use as an effective treatment option in this population. Trial Registration: This trial was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT06416865).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of alixorexton, a selective orexin 2 receptor agonist for narcolepsy type 1 (Vibrance-1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: The clinical potential of orexin 2 receptor (OX2R) agonism for improving measures of wakefulness and cataplexy in patients with narcolepsy type 1 has been described in a phase 2 study. Here, we aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of alixorexton, another oral OX2R agonist, in narcolepsy type 1. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, adult participants (aged 18-70 years) with narcolepsy type 1 were recruited from 46 hospitals and private research centres across the USA, Europe, and Australia. Participants were centrally randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) in blocks of four via an interactive response technology system stratified by region and baseline weekly cataplexy rate (WCR) to receive 4 mg, 6 mg, or 8 mg tablets of alixorexton or placebo once daily for 6 weeks, followed by an optional 7-week open-label extension. Participants had narcolepsy type 1, diagnosed per the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Third Edition, and confirmed by overnight polysomnography and the Multiple Sleep Latency Test or cerebrospinal hypocretin-1 concentrations. The sponsor, assessors, investigators, and participants were masked during the randomised double-blind treatment period. Efficacy and safety assessments were conducted in participants who received at least one dose of study drug. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 6 in mean sleep latency (MSL) on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT). Safety endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06358950) and is completed. FINDINGS: Between May 24, 2024, and May 5, 2025, 153 individuals were screened and 92 participants were randomly assigned to receive alixorexton 4 mg (n=23), 6 mg (n=22), 8 mg (n=24), or placebo (n=23). Mean age was 33·5 years (SD 12·1), 57 (62%) were women, and 35 (38%) were men. At week 6, the observed MSL on the MWT was 2·3 min (SD 2·7) for placebo, 24·0 min (8·7) for alixorexton 4 mg, 25·9 min (9·4) for 6 mg, and 28·2 min (11·4) for 8 mg. Alixorexton improved MSL on the MWT, with a least-squares mean placebo-corrected change from baseline of 22·2 min (95% CI 17·2-27·2) for alixorexton 4 mg, 24·1 min (19·0-29·1) for 6 mg, and 26·0 min (21·0-31·0) for 8 mg (adjusted p=0·0099 for 4 mg, adjusted p<0·0001 for 6 mg and 8 mg). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in at least 5% of participants given alixorexton and more frequently than those given placebo up to week 6 were pollakiuria (38 [55%]), insomnia (19 [28%]), salivary hypersecretion (17 [25%]), micturition urgency (ten [14%]), blurred vision (ten [14%]), and hyperhidrosis (five [7%]). INTERPRETATION: In this phase 2 trial, once-daily oral alixorexton provided clinically meaningful improvements at 6 weeks for participants with narcolepsy type 1, including in wakefulness, excessive daytime sleepiness, and cataplexy. The treatment was generally well tolerated, with adverse events consistent with the known on-target effects of OX2R agonists. Together, these findings support the further phase 3 evaluation of alixorexton as a potential therapeutic option for people with narcolepsy type 1. FUNDING: Alkermes.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Validation of the lung immune prognostic index in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: Post hoc analysis of the caspian and IMpower133 phase 3 trials.

BACKGROUND: The Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) is an inflammation-based biomarker associated with outcomes to immunotherapy across several tumor types. Its prognostic value in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), however, remains insufficiently validated. We aimed to validate the prognostic impact of LIPI in ES-SCLC using data from two phase III trials. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the CASPIAN (NCT03043872) and IMpower133 (NCT02763579) trials were included. LIPI groups were defined as good (dNLR<3 and LDH<ULN), intermediate (dNLR≥3 or LDH≥ULN) and poor (dNLR≥3 and LDH≥ULN). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed across LIPI categories and treatment arms. RESULTS: LIPI was available for 1140 patients (Good: 34%, Intermediate: 49%, Poor: 17%), including 708 treated with chemotherapy-immunotherapy and 432 with chemotherapy alone. Poor LIPI was associated with unfavorable characteristics, including lower albumin levels and higher rate of liver metastases. Median OS was 14.6 months (95%CI: 12.4-15.9) for LIPI Good, 10.9 (10.1-11.5) for Intermediate, and 8.4 (7.1-9.3) for Poor (p < 0.0001). In multivariate models adjusted on gender, age, ECOG, treatment arm and metastatic sites, LIPI remained an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR Poor vs. Good: 1.76, 95%CI: 1.45-2.15, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.59, 95%CI: 1.33-1.90, p < 0.001). Although patients with poor LIPI derived limited benefit from immunotherapy, no significant treatment-LIPI interaction was observed. CONCLUSION: This large post hoc analysis confirms LIPI as a robust and clinically applicable prognostic biomarker in ES-SCLC. Patients with poor LIPI have substantially worse outcomes and limited benefit from immunotherapy, highlighting the need for novel therapeutic strategies in this subgroup.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Long-term safety and efficacy of ponesimod, an oral S1P1 receptor modulator, in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS): Results from randomized phase 2b core and extension studies spanning up to 13 years.

BACKGROUND: Ponesimod demonstrated efficacy and safety in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in 24-week phase-2 core study, further confirmed by an interim combined analysis of the core and open-label long-term extension (LTE) studies (NCT01093326; up to 8 years). Current study evaluated safety and efficacy of ponesimod using combined core and LTE studies data for up to 13 years. METHODS: Of 393 participants completing the core study, 353 (90%) entered LTE, having 3 treatment periods (TP). In TP1 (∼1.85 years), participants continued core treatment (ponesimod: 10, 20, or 40 mg QD) whereas placebo-treated participants were re-randomized (1:1:1) to respective ponesimod doses. In TP2 (TP2 and TP3 combined duration: ∼10.4 years), participants on 40 mg were re-randomized (1:1) to 10/20 mg, while others continued same dose; in TP3 all participants received 20 mg. Study outcomes included safety and efficacy (ARR, time-to 24-week confirmed-disability-accumulation [24-week CDA], total T1-weighted Gadolinium-enhanced (T1 Gd+) lesions, new/enlarging T2 lesions and Combined Unique Active Lesions [CUALs]). RESULTS: For 20 mg dose, total 92.4% participants experienced ≥1 TEAEs (73.1% mild/moderate severity) and 19 (13%) participants discontinued study. Mean (95% CI) ARR=0.14 (0.10-0.20); Kaplan-Meier estimate (95% CI) of confirmed relapse and 24-week CDA=52.5% (42.3-63.5) and 31.3% (22.6-42.3). Mean [SD] T1 Gd+ lesions decreased from ponesimod baseline (2.62 [7.06]) to 12.4 years (0.26 [1.48]), mean (95% CI) CUALs per participant/year=3.97 (2.75-5.73). CONCLUSION: Ponesimod treatment for up to 13 years was not associated with new safety concerns. Participants continued to experience low levels of disease activity consistently across clinical and MRI outcomes.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Pathogenic properties of myasthenia gravis AChR autoantibodies associate with clinical response to efgartigimod.

BACKGROUND: Efgartigimod, a neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) blocker, effectively reduces total IgG, including pathogenic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) autoantibodies in myasthenia gravis (MG); however, clinical responses vary. To investigate this variability, we studied how efgartigimod impacts AChR-specific autoantibody profiles and associated pathogenic mechanisms, including complement activation, AChR internalisation and ACh-binding site blockade. METHODS: Serum samples (N=150) were sourced from 50 AChR autoantibody-positive generalised MG patients participating in the phase 3 ADAPT study, randomised to receive efgartigimod (N=40) or placebo (N=10) in cycles of 4-weekly infusions. Samples were collected at baseline, day 29 and day 57 during the first cycle. Live cell-based assays quantified AChR-specific IgG subclasses and isotypes and assessed their capacity to mediate pathomechanisms. RESULTS: Efgartigimod decreased all detectable AChR-specific IgG subclasses. At baseline, AChR autoantibody-mediated C3b deposition, AChR internalisation and ACh-binding site blockade were detected in 42 (84%), 41 (82%) and 10 (20%) patients, respectively. After 4-weekly infusions of efgartigimod, the magnitude of all three pathomechanisms was significantly decreased. However, the extent of this reduction varied across individuals. Double responders on both MG-activities of daily living and quantitative MG scores demonstrated a greater reduction in complement activity and AChR internalisation compared with patients who responded on only one score or were double non-responders. In addition, efgartigimod reduced IgG-dependent IgM binding to AChR. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that clinical efficacy may be more closely associated with functional modulation of the AChR-specific autoantibodies than with their absolute quantity alone. These results support the evaluation of mechanistic pathway monitoring as a potential strategy to predict or guide efgartigimod treatment response.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Evaluation of Sexual Function With Adjunctive Lumateperone in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.

Objective: Lumateperone is an atypical antipsychotic to treat schizophrenia, bipolar I or II depression, and major depressive disorder (MDD). Randomized phase 3 Study 502 (NCT05061706) investigated the impact of adjunctive lumateperone 42 mg/day on sexual functioning, per Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire 14-item version (CSFQ-14). Methods: Adults meeting DSM-5 criteria for MDD with inadequate response to 1-2 antidepressant therapies (ADTs) in the current depressive episode, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale Total score ≥24, Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity score ≥4, and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report-16-item score ≥14 were randomized to 6-week lumateperone 42 mg+ADT or placebo+ADT. Sexual function was assessed by CSFQ-14 Total and domain scores in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and subgroups. Results: Of 480 patients in the ITT population, 82.5% had sexual dysfunction at baseline (women=284; men=112). Lumateperone+ADT significantly improved CSFQ-14 Total score at Day 43 vs placebo+ADT (least squares mean difference [LSMD]=2.7; effect size [ES]=0.38; P<.0001). Significantly greater improvements were observed in patients with baseline sexual dysfunction (LSMD=3.1; ES=0.42; P<.0001), with no change in those without. Improvements were observed in women (LSMD=3.5; ES=0.47; P<.0001) and in men (LSMD=1.9; ES=0.33; P=.08). Significant improvements in CSFQ-14 Total score at Day 43 were observed across age groups and CSFQ domain scores, with both sexes having significant improvements in pleasure and arousal/ excitement. Improvements in depressive symptoms may be linked to improvement in sexual functioning. Conclusions: Adjunctive lumateperone 42 mg did not worsen sexual functioning and was not associated with treatment-related sexual dysfunction in patients with MDD with inadequate response to ADT. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05061706.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Assessing time to symptomatic progression, a patient-relevant efficacy endpoint, in the MARIPOSA study in non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: In the phase 3 randomized MARIPOSA study, amivantamab and lazertinib combination therapy demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus osimertinib in participants with previously untreated, epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Time to symptomatic progression (TTSP) was introduced to assess clinical worsening and complement endpoints that investigate radiographic disease progression and patient-reported outcomes. TTSP provides an easily interpretable measure of disease-specific symptom worsening to further support patient experience. METHODS: In MARIPOSA, TTSP was quantitatively assessed as a secondary efficacy endpoint and defined as the time from randomization until participants experience disease-specific symptom worsening requiring a clinical intervention or treatment change, or death. To evaluate the impact of amivantamab and lazertinib on TTSP considering its established OS benefit against osimertinib, an exploratory analysis censoring death events was performed. RESULTS: At the final protocol-specified OS analysis (median follow up: 37.8 months), median TTSP was 43.6 months with amivantamab and lazertinib versus 29.3 months with osimertinib (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.83; p < 0.0001). Amivantamab and lazertinib reduced deaths following a TTSP event compared to osimertinib. A strong correlation between TTSP and PFS or OS was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Amivantamab and lazertinib significantly delayed TTSP versus osimertinib. TTSP offers a clinician-validated measurement of disease-specific symptom worsening, capturing symptoms perceived by patients that prompt clinical action. TTSP is highly correlated with PFS and OS, providing complementary insights alongside traditional endpoints. TTSP enhances understanding of treatment benefit and supports informed clinical decision-making by integrating patient experience.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Weight and metabolic changes in patients with schizophrenia treated with paliperidone palmitate 6-month formulation versus paliperidone palmitate 3-month formulation: a post-hoc analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect that paliperidone palmitate 6-month long-acting injectable formulation (PP6M) had on metabolic parameters including body weight (BW), and blood lipid profiles, a post-hoc analysis was conducted to assess changes in BW from baseline to the end of study based on age, body mass index (BMI), and changes in blood lipid profiles during a 12-month, phase 3, double-blind (DB) clinical study. Long term effects of PP6M on BW and BMI were further explored during a 24-month extension study in which participants were treated exclusively with PP6M. METHOD: In the 12-month DB phase, participants were randomized to receive PP6M or paliperidone palmitate 3-month long-acting injectable formulation (PP3M). The mean change in BW and abnormal weight percent change from baseline were calculated at endpoint by age, gender, and BMI. Additionally, treatment-emergent shifts from baseline for the four key lipid parameters (fasting low density lipoprotein [LDL], fasting triglycerides [TG], fasting total cholesterol [TC], and fasting high density lipoprotein [HDL]) during DB were assessed. Following this study, participants were given the opportunity to transition to a 24-month extension study and be treated with PP6M. The mean change and percent change in BW, and the mean change in BMI from DB baseline to the end of the extension study (36 months total) were calculated. RESULTS: Participants who were treated with PP6M showed numerically less weight gain, BMI, waist circumference, and more weight decrease compared to PP3M group during 12-month DB phase, though the proportion of participants reporting an abnormal change (≥7% change) in BW did not significantly differ between PP3M and PP6M. The weight differences were more pronounced in the younger age group (18-25 years) and those who were overweight (BMI: 25 to <30 kg/m2. Numerical differences in favor of PP6M were found in fasting blood lipids (HDL, LDL, TG, and TC). The changes in BW and BMI over time remained consistent throughout the 24-month extension, favoring PP6M in each instance. CONCLUSIONS: This post-hoc analysis demonstrated that PP6M was comparable to PP3M in terms of metabolic parameters; however, it may have a beneficial effect on weight gain, especially in young patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Post-Hoc Analysis of Studies NCT03345342 and NCT04072575 (ClinicalTrials.gov). Significant outcomes The findings from this study have highlighted that participants who were treated with the 6-month long-acting injectable formulation of paliperidone exhibited less weight gain during treatment overall, and significantly less weight gain in adolescents and young adults. Importantly, this trend continued over the course of long-term treatment, regardless of age. Participants treated with the 6-month formulation also had fewer shifts in blood lipids outside of the normal range and had more favorable changes in body mass index and waist circumference. These results suggest that when considering metabolic dysregulation as a factor in choosing a long-acting injectable antipsychotic, the 6-month formulation is a viable alternative to the 3-month formulation, particularly in younger patients with schizophrenia. Limitations Because this is a post hoc analysis and the study was not powered to test weight and metabolic changes, most endpoints were summarized descriptively and the statistical test was limited to the main endpoint (abnormal percent weight gain and loss).

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Eltrombopag Added to Standard Immunosuppressive Treatment as Front-Line Therapy for Severe Aplastic Anemia: Long-Term Outcomes of the Phase-3 Randomized Superiority EBMT-SAAWP RACE Study.

The RACE study (NCT02009747) compared horse antithymocyte globulin (hATG) plus cyclosporine A (CsA) ± eltrombopag as initial immunosuppressive treatment (IST) for severe aplastic anemia. Here we report the final 2-year analysis of this prospective randomized phase III study. One hundred ninety-seven treatment-naive patients were randomized to standard IST (hATG 40 mg/kg × 4 days and CsA 5 mg/kg/day; arm A; n = 101) or standard IST + eltrombopag at the dose of 150 mg/day (arm B; n = 96) from day +14 until 6 months (or 3 months, in case of complete response). The median follow-up was 23.2 months. The 2-year cumulative incidence of complete response was significantly superior in arm B (62.4% vs. 35.3%; p < 0.001). The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 86% in arm A and 91% in arm B (p = 0.081), with hazard ratio (HR), adjusted for age and disease severity, of 0.54 (p = 0.064). The 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 56% vs. 37% (adjusted HR = 0.49; p < 0.001), while event-free survival (EFS) was 48% vs. 32% (p < 0.001), with adjusted HR = 0.54 (p < 0.001), both significantly superior for arm B. The cumulative incidence of relapse was comparable in the two arms, while evolution to clinical paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria was 8% in arm A and 1% in arm B (p = 0.041). The risk of clonal evolution remained negligible, with one patient in arm A and two in arm B developing karyotypic abnormalities. The initial hematological response benefit of eltrombopag added to IST as front-line treatment of AA is associated with better 2-year OS, DFS, and EFS without increased risk of secondary myeloid malignancies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Phase 1 Study Evaluating Gefurulimab Pharmacokinetics and Safety Following Delivery Via Autoinjector or Prefilled Syringe With Needle Safety Device in Healthy Adults.

PURPOSE: Gefurulimab, a novel dual-binding nanobody targeting complement component 5 (C5), is in clinical development for anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis. Gefurulimab has a low molecular weight, enabling subcutaneous (SC) self-administration by autoinjector (AI) or prefilled syringe with needle safety device (PFS-SD). We compared gefurulimab pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure and safety in healthy adults following a single SC dose administered by AI versus PFS-SD. METHODS: In this phase 1, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study (NCT06208488), healthy participants aged 18 to 65 years were stratified by weight and randomized equally to 1 of 6 combination groups of device and injection site (abdomen/thigh/upper arm). Participants received a single SC dose of gefurulimab on day 1 and were assessed throughout the 92-day evaluation period. Primary endpoints were PK parameters for each device: maximum observed concentration (Cmax) and area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUCinf, AUClast). PK across injection sites, pharmacodynamics, safety, immunogenicity, and device performance were also assessed. FINDINGS: Overall, 175 participants were randomized: AI (n = 87), PFS-SD (n = 88). Geometric least squares mean ratios (90% CI) comparing AI/PFS-SD for Cmax, AUCinf, and AUClast were 97.6% (94.5-100.8), 99.6% (96.1-103.3), and 98.8% (95.2‒102.6), respectively. Secondary analyses found no meaningful differences in PK parameters across injection sites. Serum-free C5 concentrations over time, treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) profiles, and antidrug antibody responses were similar between cohorts. Most TEAEs were mild; none led to study discontinuation. IMPLICATIONS: SC administration of gefurulimab by AI and PFS-SD was well tolerated with comparable exposure, meeting bioequivalence criteria.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Pedagogical Efficacy of LLM-Generated Synthetic Data Versus Real-World Clinical Records: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial.

BACKGROUND: Expert-reviewed clinical cases generated by large language models (LLMs) may supplement case resources in medical education, but their short-term educational performance relative to real-case-derived teaching materials remains uncertain. We compared immediate post-training test performance after teaching with the two types of case materials and assessed non-inferiority against a prespecified margin. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, parallel-group, randomized non-inferiority trial. Through the Wenjuanxing online platform, participants were randomized 1:1 to learn with either real-case-derived teaching cases compiled by clinicians and reviewed by experts or AI-generated clinical cases produced by Gemini 3.0 Pro from fully de-identified matched real cases and reviewed by three senior general surgery specialists with full-professor rank. The primary outcome was the total score on an independent 10-item immediate post-training test (0-10 points), with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of -0.5 points. Secondary outcomes included the training-phase performance score, learning efficiency index, single-item mental effort rating, case realism, and case-source judgment. RESULTS: A total of 403 participants were randomized, of whom 386 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis: 192 in the real-case group and 194 in the AI-generated case group. The mean post-training test score was 4.95 (SD, 3.35) in the real-case group and 4.61 (SD, 3.35) in the AI-generated case group. The mean difference (AI-generated minus real-case group) was -0.335 points (95% CI, -1.006 to 0.337). Because the lower bound of the confidence interval was below the prespecified non-inferiority margin of -0.5 points, non-inferiority was not demonstrated (one-sided P = 0.314). No significant between-group differences were observed in the training-phase performance score, learning efficiency index, or single-item mental effort rating. AI-generated cases received lower realism ratings for Level 3 cases. The proportion of participants with at least one high-confidence completely incorrect response was 1.6% in the real-case group and 2.1% in the AI-generated case group. CONCLUSIONS: In this short-term, text-based online case-learning setting, no statistically significant between-group difference was observed in immediate post-training test performance; however, non-inferiority of AI-generated clinical cases relative to real-case-derived teaching materials was not demonstrated.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill Versus Incremental Composite Placement Approaches in Vital Posterior Teeth: A 24 Months Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Composite resin placement technique may influence marginal integrity, polymerization stress distribution, and long-term clinical performance of posterior restorations. This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the 24-month clinical performance of four different placement techniques in Class I posterior composite restorations. METHODS: Fifty patients aged 20-35 years presenting with four occlusal carious lesions each were enrolled, resulting in 200 restorations. Cavities (4-5 mm depth) were prepared according to caries extension. Restorations were randomly allocated into four equal groups (n = 50) according to placement technique: stamp technique, snowplow technique, modified incremental "pizza" technique, and bulk-fill technique. All materials were applied following manufacturers' instructions. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline and after 6, 12, and 24 months using FDI criteria. Functional (fracture/retention, marginal adaptation), esthetic (marginal staining, anatomical form), and biological (postoperative sensitivity, secondary caries) properties were assessed by two calibrated evaluators. Statistical analysis was performed at a significance level of α = 0.05. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with a total of 152 restorations were evaluated at the end of the 24 months in line with FDI at the end of the study with 76% recall rates. No statistically significant differences were observed among groups regarding fracture/retention or secondary caries (p > 0.05). Marginal adaptation and marginal staining demonstrated minor deterioration over time across all groups, with statistically significant intergroup differences found (p < 0.05). Postoperative sensitivity was minimal and transient in all groups with no significant difference (p = 0.181). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this 24-month follow-up, the four placement techniques demonstrated comparable clinical performance in Class I posterior composite restorations. Selection of technique may therefore be guided by clinical preference and procedural efficiency rather than differences in short-term clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07415317.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion With Lateral Vertebral Screw Fixation Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Severe Lumbar Stenosis: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The benefits of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) vs transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in severe lumbar stenosis (Schizas C/D) remain uncertain. This randomized trial compared clinical, radiographic, and safety outcomes of OLIF and TLIF. METHODS: From November 2018 to December 2021, a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolled 260 adults with single-level severe stenosis and instability. In total, 224 patients were randomized to OLIF or TLIF. Prespecified outcomes followed consolidated standards of reporting trials. Primary outcomes were visual analog scale back/leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), with minimal clinically important difference thresholds of ODI ≥12-13 points or ≥30% improvement, and visual analog scale ≥1.5-2.0 points. Radiographic measures included disc height, lumbar and segmental lordosis, and canal cross-sectional area (CSA). Complications were recorded. Ethics approval was obtained from the institutional review board, the trial was registered with ISRCTN.com , and all patients provided written informed consent. RESULTS: In total, 224 patients were randomized, 5 were lost to follow-up (TLIF n = 2, OLIF n = 3). Baseline features were comparable. OLIF was associated with shorter operative time, less blood loss, earlier ambulation, and shorter hospital stay (all P < .05). Both groups achieved significant, clinically meaningful improvements. OLIF showed greater back pain reduction at 3-6 months and 2 years ( P < .05) and superior ODI improvement at 3 and 6 months ( P < .001), although long-term ODI scores were similar. Radiographically, OLIF provided greater restoration of disc height and segmental lordosis (all P < .001) and demonstrated progressive CSA increase (dynamic decompression), whereas TLIF achieved immediate, sustained CSA enlargement. Fusion rates were comparable at 1-2 years. Complication rates were low and similar (7.3% TLIF vs 5.5% OLIF), with most OLIF-specific events transient. CONCLUSION: Both OLIF and TLIF yield improvements in severe lumbar stenosis. OLIF offers perioperative advantages, earlier functional recovery, radiographic restoration, and dynamic canal remodeling, supporting its role as an equivalent alternative for lumbar spinal stenosis with some secondary advantages.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Heterogeneity in Teriflunomide Treatment Arms: A Systematic Review and Meta‑Regression of Randomised Multiple Sclerosis Trials.

BACKGROUND: Teriflunomide is widely used as an active comparator in Phase 3 randomised trials for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Temporal changes in disease activity within teriflunomide-treated cohorts have not been systematically examined. OBJECTIVES: To assess temporal trends in relapse and disability outcomes across teriflunomide arms of Phase 3 multiple sclerosis (MS) trials and identify predictors of between-trial heterogeneity. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of Phase 3 randomised controlled trials including a teriflunomide arm. PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to October 2025. Annualised relapse rate (ARR) and 12- and 24-week confirmed disability worsening (CDW) were extracted together with baseline characteristics. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Random-effects meta-analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Twelve teriflunomide cohorts from eight trials involving 4,900 adults with RMS were included. ARR ranged from 0.11 to 0.37 with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 94%). Trial start year was inversely associated with ARR and explained a large proportion of between-study variability in exploratory meta-regression analyses. Confirmed disability worsening outcomes also showed substantial heterogeneity with a weaker trend toward lower event rates in more recent trials. CONCLUSION: Teriflunomide-treated trial populations have shifted toward lower relapse activity over time, and trial start year was the principal predictor of between-trial heterogeneity in ARR in exploratory analyses. These findings most plausibly reflect evolving recruitment and diagnostic practices rather than changes in drug efficacy. Accounting for these temporal dynamics is essential when interpreting outcomes from RMS trial using teriflunomide as comparator.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Sex Differences in Postoperative Recovery and Mortality After High-Risk Cardiac Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Post Hoc Analysis of the SUSTAIN-CSX Trial.

BACKGROUND: Sex-related differences after cardiac surgery remain controversial because women often present with higher baseline risk and complexity than men. We performed a post hoc propensity score-matched analysis of the SUSTAIN-CSX (Sodium Selenite Administration in Cardiac Surgery) trial to evaluate sex differences in mortality, postoperative complications, and recovery after high-risk cardiac surgery. METHODS: Of 1394 trial participants, 1386 had complete data. Women were matched 1:1 to men using nearest-neighbor propensity score matching based on age and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II), with exact matching on surgical category, yielding 327 female-male pairs. Prespecified sensitivity analyses adjusted for frailty, baseline hemoglobin, renal disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, previous myocardial infarction, preoperative medications, and baseline creatinine. RESULTS: In the primary matched analysis, 180-day survival did not differ between women and men (log-rank P=0.086; unadjusted hazard ratio, 1.80 [95% CI, 0.91-3.55]; P=0.091). In descriptive matched comparisons, women had numerically longer intensive care unit stay (median, 3 days [quartile 1, quartile 3 (Q1, Q3)=1, 6 days] versus 2 days [Q1, Q3=1, 5 days]) and hospital stay (median, 10 days [Q1, Q3=7, 18 days] versus 9 days [Q1, Q3=6, 16 days]; P=0.292), whereas major postoperative complications were similar. In adjusted sensitivity analyses accounting for the matched design and residual imbalance, female sex remained associated with longer intensive care unit stay (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.8 [95% CI, 1.2-2.9]; P=0.009) and hospital stay (adjusted IRR, 1.4 [95% CI, 1.0-1.9]; P=0.031). Mortality sensitivity analyses were model-dependent. CONCLUSIONS: In this propensity score-matched cohort of high-risk cardiac surgery patients, women showed a longer postoperative recovery trajectory in adjusted analyses, whereas mortality findings were sensitive to model specification and should be interpreted cautiously. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02002247.

Aged↗

PubMed2026

Acute Haemodynamic and Perceptual Responses to Graded Intradialytic Exercise in Patients on Maintenance Haemodialysis: A Randomised Crossover Trial.

BACKGROUND: Acute responses to graded intradialytic exercise in people receiving haemodialysis remain incompletely characterised. OBJECTIVES: To examine acute haemodynamic and perceptual responses to graded intradialytic resistance exercise compared with a non-exercise control condition. DESIGN: Randomised crossover trial. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-eight clinically stable adults receiving maintenance haemodialysis. MEASUREMENTS: Participants completed seated control and graded lower-limb resistance exercise targeting Borg category-ratio 10 ratings of 3, 5 and 7. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, rating of perceived exertion and acute fatigue were measured before, immediately after and 30 min after each condition. RESULTS: Responses increased progressively with perceived intensity. Compared with control, higher perceived intensity increased systolic blood pressure by 14.9 mmHg (95% confidence interval = 12.7-17.0), diastolic blood pressure by 8.4 mmHg (6.8-10.0), mean arterial pressure by 10.6 mmHg (9.2-12.0) and heart rate by 15.5 beats per minute (12.9-18.1). Rating of perceived exertion increased by 6.7 points (95% confidence interval = 6.3-7.1). Mean peripheral oxygen saturation remained between 95.1% and 97.5%, with no value below 90%. Recorded symptoms occurred in 13 out of 48 higher perceived-intensity sessions; no serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Graded, rating-guided intradialytic resistance exercise produced clear acute dose-response haemodynamic and perceptual changes. These findings support supervised individualisation of acute exercise dose but do not establish long-term safety or superiority of higher perceived-intensity training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry: PACTR202606476360900.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Oro-esophageal feeding for tracheostomized patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: This study reports the clinical effects of intermittent oro-esophageal tube feeding (IOE) versus nasogastric tube feeding (NGT) on nutritional status, aspiration pneumonia, decannulation, and level of consciousness in tracheostomized patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI). METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted between March 2024 and October 2025 in China and included tracheostomized patients with sTBI. Participants were randomized 1:1 to the intervention and control groups for 28-day interventions. IOE or NGT was used for nutritional supports, respectively. The primary outcome was nutritional status, including hemoglobin, albumin, prealbumin and body mass index. The secondary outcomes included aspiration pneumonia, decannulation, and level of consciousness assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Generalized linear mixed-effects models, generalized estimating equations, and Cox regression were used for data analyze. RESULTS: A total of 104 participants were included in the analysis. After intervention, significant interaction effects were observed in hemoglobin (β = 5.272, 95% CI: 2.707, 7.837), albumin (β = 3.675, 95% CI: 1.854, 5.496), prealbumin (β = 11.835, 95% CI: 6.623, 17.047), body mass index (β = 1.719, 95% CI: 0.868, 2.569), the GCS (β = 0.981, 95% CI: 0.572, 1.390), and aspiration pneumonia (OR= 0.304, 95% CI: 0.133, 0.693). The Cox model revealed that group significantly influenced the decannulation outcomes [HR (95% CI) =5.556 (3.197, 9.657), p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: In tracheostomized patients with sTBI who received routine treatment, IOE is more conducive to decannulation and the improvement in nutritional status, aspiration pneumonia, and level of consciousness than NGT. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06328985, 03/18/2024, clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06328985).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

BLIS study: a feasibility randomised controlled trial assessing compliance, acceptability and colonisation with different dosing regimens of the probiotic supplement Streptococcus salivarius K12 (Bactoblis) in adults in England.

OBJECTIVES: Streptococcus salivarius K12 (SsK12) is a bacterium used as a probiotic with some evidence for preventing acute sore throat/tonsillitis, but the optimal dosing strategy is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate two dosing regimens of SsK12 to establish (a) the prevalence and duration of colonisation with SsK12 and (b) the acceptability and feasibility of these regimens. DESIGN: A randomised, non-blinded feasibility trial. SETTING: Primary care in the south of England. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with ≥2 episodes of sore throat within the 3 years before recruitment. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomised to take SsK12 lozenges once weekly or daily over 14 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the prevalence and duration of colonisation with SsK12. This was determined by real-time PCR conducted on self-taken whole-mouth swabs provided by participants at baseline and on days 2, 7, 14, 21 and 35. Secondary outcomes were the compliance and acceptability of the two SsK12 dosing regimens, based on questionnaire data. RESULTS: 53 participants were recruited (26 randomised to weekly and 27 to daily dosing) between 26 April and 5 December 2023. All swabs were returned by 65.4% (17/26) and 70.4% (19/27) of the weekly and daily groups respectively. Swabs at all timepoints from participants with PCR positives observed at baseline (two and four from the weekly and daily group, respectively) were excluded. Therefore, swabs from 23 participants in the weekly and 22 in the daily group did not have evidence of baseline colonisation and were included in the microbiology analysis. SsK12 colonisation was found in 59.1% (13/22, 95% CI 38.6% to 79.6%) of samples in both groups on day 2; in 13.6% (3/22, 95% CI 0.0% to 28.0%) and 85.7% (18/21, 95% CI 70.8% to 100.0%) of the weekly and daily groups, respectively, on day 7; in 19.1% (4/21, 95% CI 2.3% to 35.8%) and 59.1% (13/22, 95% CI 38.6% to 79.6%), respectively, on day 14; and in only one participant (weekly group) on days 21 and 35. The dosing regimen was reported as easy to follow by 85.0% (17/20, 95% CI 69.4% to 100.0%) of the weekly and 96.2% (25/26, 95% CI 88.8% to 100.0%) of the daily dosing groups. CONCLUSIONS: SsK12 colonisation was more prevalent with daily dosing; however, colonisation was not maintained when dosing stopped. Both dosing regimens were acceptable to participants. These findings support the use of daily dosing in a future trial to evaluate the efficacy of SsK12 in preventing recurrence of sore throat/tonsillitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04297878.

Humans↗