Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Valves”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources

Survival and valve failure after aortic valve replacement.

A prospective evaluation of 412 consecutive patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement between January 1982 and December 1985 was performed in an attempt to identify the determinants of survival and valve failure. A variety of valves were inserted to permit a prospective evaluation of alternative valves including: Björk-Shiley mechanical (n = 37), Ionescu-Shiley pericardial (n = 261), Hancock pericardial (n = 78), and Carpentier-Edwards porcine (n = 36). Thirteen patients died in the hospital (3.2%) and 47 patients died in the follow-up period producing an actuarial survival of 81% +/- 3% at 48 months. Survival was independently predicted by advancing age, preoperative New York Heart Association functional class, and the presence of endocarditis (p less than 0.05 by Cox regression analysis). The majority of patients were symptomatically improved (New York Heart Association class I or II: 21% preoperative, 88% postoperative). Freedom from structural valve dysfunction, prosthetic valve endocarditis, and reoperation for valve-related complications were 95% +/- 2%, 95% +/- 2%, and 92% +/- 2% at 48 months, respectively. These valve-related complications occurred more frequently in younger patients and in those with a Hancock pericardial valve (freedom from structural valve dysfunction, 89% +/- 5%; prosthetic valve endocarditis, 84% +/- 9%; reoperation, 78% +/- 10%; p less than 0.05 by Cox regression). Freedom from thromboembolism was 88% +/- 2% at 48 months; it was significantly lower in patients with a preoperative thromboembolic event and was not influenced by the type of prosthesis inserted. Freedom from anticoagulant-related hemorrhage was 85% +/- 8% at 48 months and was not influenced by any preoperative factors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aortic Valve↗

Left ventricular remodeling early after aortic valve replacement: differential effects on diastolic function in aortic valve stenosis and aortic regurgitation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of aortic valve replacement (AVR) on left ventricular (LV) function and LV remodeling, comparing patients with aortic valve stenosis to patients with aortic regurgitation. BACKGROUND: Aortic valve disease is associated with eccentric or concentric LV hypertrophy and changes in LV function. The relationship between LV geometry and LV function and the effect of LV remodeling after AVR on diastolic filling, in patients with aortic valve stenosis compared with aortic regurgitation, are largely unknown.Nineteen patients with aortic valve disease (12 aortic valve stenosis, 7 aortic regurgitation) were studied using magnetic resonance imaging to assess LV geometry and LV function before and 9 +/- 3 months after AVR. Ten age-matched healthy males served as control subjects. RESULTS: Before AVR, the ratio between left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) was only increased in patients with aortic valve stenosis (1.37 +/- 0.16 g/ml) compared with control subjects (0.93 +/- 0.08 g/ml, p < 0.05). After AVR, LVMI/LVEDVI decreased significantly in aortic valve stenosis (to 1.15 +/- 0.14 g/ml, p < 0.0001), but increased significantly in aortic regurgitation (1.02 +/- 0.20 g/ml to 1.44 +/- 0.27 g/ml, p < 0.0001). Before AVR, diastolic filling was impaired in both aortic valve stenosis and aortic regurgitation. Early after AVR, diastolic filling improved in patients with aortic valve stenosis, whereas patients with aortic regurgitation showed a deterioration in diastolic filling. CONCLUSIONS: Early after AVR, patients with aortic valve stenosis show a decrease in both LVMI and LVMI/LVEDVI and an improvement in diastolic filling, whereas in patients with aortic regurgitation, LVMI decreases less rapidly than LVEDVI, causing concentric remodeling of the LV, most likely explaining the observed deterioration of diastolic filling in these patients.

Adult↗

Hemodynamic function of the standard St. Jude bileaflet disc valve has no clinical impact 10 years after aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: Size mismatch and impaired left ventricular function have been shown to determine the hemodynamic function of the standard St. Jude bileaflet disc valve early after aortic valve replacement (AVR). We aimed to analyse St. Jude valve hemodynamic function and its clinical impact in the survivors of a prospective series 10 years after AVR for aortic stenosis. DESIGN: Forty-three survivors aged 32-90 years from a prospective series attended a follow-up study with Doppler echo and radionuclide cardiography 10 years after AVR for aortic stenosis. Six patients with significant left sided valve regurgitation were excluded from further analysis: they had significantly lower St. Jude valve gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and larger mass index (LVMi) than 37 without. RESULTS: In the 37 patients without left sided valve regurgitation peak and mean gradients were inversely related to St. Jude valve geometric orifice area (GOA) indexed for either body surface area or left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD). The gradients correlated directly with LVEDD but not with LVEF or LVMi. Eleven patients with hypertension had higher peak gradients (31+/-13 versus 22+/-8 mmHg, p<0.05), lower LVEF, and higher LVEDD and LVMi than 26 without. Peak gradient was greater than 35 mmHg in five hypertensive patients with normal LVEF but lesser than 30 mmHg in six with impaired LVEF. Supranormal LVEF and severe size mismatch identified the remaining patients (N=3) with peak gradient above 35 mmHg. In a multilinear regression analysis GOA indexed for LVEDD, hypertension, and LVEF were independently related to peak gradient. CONCLUSION: High gradients of the standard St. Jude bileaflet disc valve 10 years after AVR was primarily related to systemic hypertension and mismatch between valve and left ventricular cavity size. Hypertension and left sided valve regurgitation, but not St. Jude valve gradient or size mismatch, were the dominant determinants of left ventricular hypertrophy and impaired function.

Adult↗

Ruptured mitral valve aneurysm in a patient with quadricuspid aortic valve.

Mitral aneurysm is commonly associated with infectious endocarditis of the aortic valve. In rare instances, it is associated with other underlying inflammatory or metabolic disorders. A 62-year-old man with mitral valve insufficiency with moderate aortic valve insufficiency underwent operation. Operative findings were the ruptured aneurysm of the mitral valve in association with the calcified quadricuspid aortic valve. There was no evidence of infection in the mitral valve and the aortic valve. The mitral valve was repaired, the aortic valve replaced, and Cox Maze procedure added. A rare combination of mitral and aortic valve lesions without endocarditis suggested that mechanical stress alone may induce mitral valve aneurysm.

Aneurysm, Ruptured↗

Artificial valve replacement for congenital bicuspid aortic valves.

The congenital bicuspid aortic valve functions almost normally provided degeneration does not occur, but complications of infective endocarditis and calcification of the cusps with aging are indications for surgical intervention. We compared 22 cases with an incompetent bicuspid aortic valve (14 cases with stenosis and eight with regurgitation) with 96 cases of acquired tricuspid aortic valve (30 cases with stenosis and 66 with regurgitation) who were treated by aortic valve replacement (AVR) during the same period. Compared with the stenotic tricuspid aortic valve cases, the stenotic bicuspid aortic valve cases: 1) were older at AVR (59.3: 51.7 years, P < 0.05), 2) had a smaller diameter of preoperative valve orifice (6.9: 9.2 mm, P < 0.05), 3) had a smaller valve ring diameter (23.0: 24.3 mm, P < 0.05), 4) used artificial valves of almost identical size (22.0: 22.5), and 5) included no operative deaths (0: 10%). In contrast, compared with the tricuspid aortic valve cases with regurgitation, the bicuspid aortic valve cases with regurgitation: 1) were younger at AVR (39.5: 45.8 years), 2) had a higher incidence of infective endocarditis (62.5: 19.6%, P < 0.02) as a complication, and 3) showed a higher operative death rate (25.0: 6.1%), although this difference was not statistically significant. Suture repair of the incised portion of the aorta must be performed meticulously in patients with prominent poststenotic dilatation of the ascending aorta.

Adolescent↗

[Four boys with multiple floppy valves involving all cardiac valves and hyperextensive joints].

We experienced four boys (two siblings) whose cardiac valves were all prolapsed, which have never been reported as a recognized disease. All had hyperextensive joints without any other stigmata of Marfan or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. The severity and progression of regurgitation of each valve differed by a case, though they had similar echocardiographic findings consistent with the diagnosis of multiple floppy valves. Three of the four patients had severe aortic regurgitation, and two received aortic valve replacement. Their excised valves revealed myxomatous degeneration. The tricuspid valves were more thickened and redundant than the mitral valves. Although three patients had moderate tricuspid regurgitation, none of them had clinically important mitral regurgitation. We recommend aortic and/or mitral valve replacement, whenever the regurgitation exacerbates left ventricular dilatation. Aortic regurgitation deteriorated rapidly in one case due to valve rupture. In this case, moderate tricuspid regurgitation was relieved after aortic valve replacement. Skin fibroblast did not show any abnormalities in collagen biosynthesis.

Adolescent↗