Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Simvastatin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Comparative effects of simvastatin and atorvastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients with characteristics of metabolic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Hypercholesterolemic patients with metabolic syndrome (MS) are at high risk for coronary heart disease. The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) guidelines provide the option of aggressively lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in hypercholesterolemic patients with MS. OBJECTIVE: The lipid-modifying efficacy of simvastatin and atorvastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients with MS as defined by NCEP ATP III was assessed. METHODS: A post hoc subgroup analysis was performed on data from a 36-week, multicenter (54 sites worldwide), randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-escalation (forced-titration) study designed to assess the effects of simvastatin (40-80 mg) and atorvastatin (20-80 mg) on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein (apo) A-I levels in patients with LDL-C > or = 160 mg/dL. Patients were classified as having MS if they met >/=3 of the following criteria: (1) triglyceride (TG) level > or =150 mg/dL; (2) HDL-C <40 mg/dL (men) or <50 mg/dL (women); (3) secondary diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or taking antidiabetic medication and/or fasting serum glucose (FSG) level > or =110 mg/dL; (4) secondary diagnosis of hypertension and/or taking antihypertensive medication and/or systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or =130/ > or =85 mm Hg; and (5) body mass index (BMI) > or =30 kg/m(2) (surrogate for waist circumference). RESULTS: Of 808 evaluable patients, 212 (26.2%) were classified as having MS at baseline. Compared with the non-MS subgroup, MS patients were slightly older and more likely to be female. They also had higher BMI, SBP/DBP, FSG, and TG levels, and lower HDL-C and apo A-I levels than non-MS patients. The simvastatin group contained 99 patients; the atorvastatin group, 113 patients. Both drugs produced large reductions in total cholesterol, LDL-C, non-HDL-C, TG, and apo B, with atorvastatin producing slightly greater reductions in TG. However, simvastatin consistently produced larger increases in HDL-C and apo A-I than atorvastatin, especially at higher doses. After 36 weeks of treatment, 47.7% and 48.5% in the simvastatin and atorvastatin groups, respectively, no longer met > or =3 of the MS criteria. CONCLUSIONS: In hypercholesterolemic patients with characteristics of MS, simvastatin and atorvastatin had comparable beneficial effects on apo B-containing atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins, and MS status was effectively modified by both drugs. However, although atorvastatin produced slightly larger decreases in TG, simvastatin produced larger increases in HDL-C.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

A 52-week, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, double-dummy study to assess the efficacy of atorvastatin and simvastatin in reaching low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride targets: the treat-to-target (3T) study.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for the prevention of coronary heart disease call for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction as the primary target of treatment and reduction of triglycerides (TG) as an additional target. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of atorvastatin and simvastatin to reduce LDL-C and TG concentrations and to meet 3 target lipid levels: LDL-C or=4.0 mmol/L (>or=155 mg/dL), were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive once-daily oral treatment with 20 mg atorvastatin or 20 mg simvastatin. Fasting (12-hour) blood samples for the estimation of lipid levels and clinical laboratory values were collected after 4, 8, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. The dose was doubled after 12 weeks if the target National Cholesterol Education Program level of LDL-C (<or=2.6 mmol/L [100 mg/dL]) was not reached at 8 weeks. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat analysis included 552 patients (418 men, 134 women) randomized to receive atorvastatin and 535 (404 men, 131 women) randomized to receive simvastatin. The number of patients enrolled in the study allowed the evaluation fo the drugs' effects on TG. Patient demogrpahic characteristics were similar for the 2 treatment groups, and there were no differences in baseline lipid values. Compared with simvastatin, atorvastatin produced significantly greater reductions in LDL-C (8 weeks: -46% vs -40%, P < 0.001; 52 weeks: -49% vs -44%, P < 0.001) and in TG (8 weeks: -23% vs -14%, P < 0.001; 52 weeks: -24% vs -16%, P < 0.001). Compared with simvastatin-treated patients, a significantly greater number of atorvastatin-treated patients reached the LDL-C target after 8 weeks (45% vs 24%; P < 0.001). Fewer atorvastatin patients needed to have their dose doubled; nevertheless more atorvastatin patients reached the LDL-C target after 52 weeks (61% vs 41%; P < 0.001). Both statins were well tolerated. Muscular symptoms occurred in 12 patients (2.2%) in the atorvastatin group and in 13 patients (2.4%) in the simvastatin group. CONCLUSIONS: Atorvastatin 20 or 40 mg/d for up to 1 year of treatment was significantly more effective than simvastatin 20 or 40 mg/d in reducing LDL-C and TG levels and at achieving recommended lipid targets in this selected patient population with cardiovascular disease and dyslipidemia. Both statis were well tolerated.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Simvastatin retards progression of retinopathy in diabetic patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Besides hyperglycemia and hypertension, a recently recognized risk factor for diabetic retinopathy (DR) appears to be hyperlipidemia. While studies using earlier generation lipid lowering agents in DR were disappointing, a randomized trial using HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors has strong rationale, though hitherto not attempted. The aim of the present study was to compare the HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor, simvastatin, with placebo in patients having DR in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Fifty patients with diabetes mellitus (Type 1 and 2) with good glycemic control and hypercholesterolemia and having DR (non-clinically significant macular edema and visual acuity 6/24 or better) in either or both eyes were randomized to simvastatin 20-mg per day or placebo, and were followed up for 180 days. On simvastatin therapy, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) decreased (P < 0.001, respectively), and the level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) increased (P < 0.001). VA improved in four patients using simvastatin, (not statistically different from placebo group) and worsening of VA occurred in seven patients in the placebo group and none in the simvastatin group (P = 0.009). Fundus fluorescein angiography and color fundus photograph showed improvement in one patient in the simvastatin group, while seven patients showed worsening in the placebo group (P = 0.009). The observations of the current study suggest that the HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor simvastatin significantly retards the progression of retinopathy in diabetic patients with hypercholesterolemia. The potential of this class of drugs for the primary prevention of DR and other microvascular complications needs to be explored further.

Blood Glucose↗
PubMed2002

Comparative beneficial effects of simvastatin and pravastatin on cardiac allograft rejection and survival.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the relative effects of low doses of pravastatin (20 mg/day) and simvastatin (10 mg/day) on indices of cardiac allograft rejection. We further examined the relative efficacy and safety of these two drugs on lipid-lowering in heart transplantation. BACKGROUND: The immunomodulatory effects of hydroxy methyl glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors have been increasingly recognized. Previous studies have demonstrated an ameliorative influence of pravastatin on hemodynamically compromising rejection after heart transplantation. A recent observational trial suggested that simvastatin 20 mg/day was associated with trends to lower survival and more adverse effects than pravastatin 40 mg/day. METHODS: In a 12-month prospective, open-label study, 50 heart transplant recipients received either open-label pravastatin 20 mg daily (n = 24) or simvastatin 10 mg daily (n = 26) within four weeks of transplantation. Indices of allograft rejection including treated rejection, rejection with hemodynamic compromise, noncellular rejection, and mean one-year biopsy score were compared between the two cohorts, as well as with a statin-naive control population (n = 37). Lipid levels, safety, and post-transplant outcomes were also assessed as secondary end points. RESULTS: We found no significant differences in any allograft rejection parameter between the two groups. However, total low-density lipoprotein (LDL), but not high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or triglycerides, were lower in the simvastatin arm (-23% vs. -11%, p = 0.02). No cases of rhabdomyolysis or myositis occurred in either group. Survival at one year was similar in both treatment groups (91% for patients on pravastatin and 92% for patients on simvastatin). Both groups had better survival compared with the statin-naive control group (80%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin (10 mg/day) and pravastatin (20 mg/day) are associated with similar beneficial effects on cardiac allograft rejection and one-year survival. At these doses, simvastatin decreases LDL cholesterol more so than pravastatin with no increase in adverse effects in heart transplantation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Effects of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor simvastatin on smooth muscle cell proliferation in vitro and neointimal formation in vivo after vascular injury.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the effects of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors on vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) proliferation in vitro and neointimal formation in vivo after vascular injury. BACKGROUND: Neointimal hyperplasia after vascular injury is responsible for restenosis after arterial stenting, whereas arterial remodeling and neointimal formation are the causes of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. METHODS: We assessed the effect of simvastatin on in vitro VSMC proliferation. To study the effects of simvastatin in vivo, balloon injury and stent deployment were performed in the common carotid artery of rats. Neointimal area was measured two weeks later in the balloon injury model and three weeks after stent deployment. RESULTS: Simvastatin markedly inhibits VSMC proliferation in vitro. In vivo, simvastatin reduced, in a dose-dependent manner, the neointimal area and the neointima-media ratio after balloon injury from 0.266 +/- 0.015 mm2 to 0.080 +/- 0.026 mm2 and from 1.271 +/- 0.074 to 0.436 +/- 0.158 (p < 0.001 vs. control rats) at the highest dose. Simvastatin also significantly reduced the neointimal formation and the neointima-media ratio after stenting from 0.508 +/- 0.035 mm2 to 0.362 +/- 0.047 mm2 (p < 0.05 vs. control rats) and from 2.000 +/- 0.136 to 1.374 +/- 0.180 (p < 0.05 vs. control rats). The vessel thrombosis rate after stent deployment was 30% in the control group and 11.1% in the treated group (p = NS). Moreover, the systemic administration of simvastatin did not affect hepatic and renal functions, blood pressure or heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin potently inhibits VSMC proliferation in vitro and reduces neointimal formation in a rat model of vascular injury.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Efficacy and safety of pravastatin vs simvastatin after cardiac transplantation.

Prior studies of cardiac transplant recipients have shown that pravastatin reduces 12-month rejection and mortality after cardiac transplantation and simvastatin reduces 4-year mortality, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, and intimal thickening. In a 12-month observational study, cardiac transplant recipients received open-label pravastatin 40 mg (n = 42) or simvastatin 20 mg daily (n = 45) on an alternating basis from the time of transplantation. Lipid levels, safety, and post-transplant outcomes were compared. We found no significant differences in total LDL or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, linearized infection or rejection rates, liver function tests, or immunosuppressant dosages between groups at 1, 3, 6, or 12 months. Rhabdomyolysis or myositis occurred only in patients on simvastatin (n = 6, 13.3%) with no episodes for patients on pravastatin (p = 0. 032). Survival at 12 months on an actual treatment basis was 97.6% for patients on pravastatin and 83.7% for those on simvastatin (p = 0.078). Immunosuppression-related deaths occurred in only 2.4% (1 patient) on pravastatin vs 15.6% (n = 7) on simvastatin (p = 0.06). Pravastatin and simvastatin resulted in comparable lipid profiles. Pravastatin use was however free from the high rates of rhabdomyolysis and myositis seen with simvastatin use. Pravastatin was additionally associated with a trend toward superior survival, attributable to fewer immunosuppression-related deaths. For safety and pharmacokinetic reasons, pravastatin should be considered the statin of choice after heart transplantation.

Cholesterol, HDL↗
PubMed2003

The effects of raloxifene and simvastatin on plasma lipids and endothelium.

PURPOSE: Raloxifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator and an attractive alternative to estrogen replacement as it obviates the need for a progestin and does not increase C-reactive protein levels. We compared the effects of simvastatin and raloxifene treatments on the lipid profile, the levels of adhesion molecules and the endothelium dependent and independent vasoreactivity. SUBJECTS & METHODS: We treated 12 postmenopausal women with hypercholesterolemia and coronary artery disease with raloxifene 60 mg/day and simvastatin 20 mg/day in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Each treatment period was 8 weeks long with a 4-week washout interval. Plasma lipids and cellular adhesion molecules were evaluated and peripheral blood flow studies with venous occlusion plethysmography were performed. RESULTS: Both simvastatin and raloxifene significantly reduced total [33% (27-40), 12% (0-24)] and LDL [44% (36-52), 16% (0-33)] cholesterol compared to baseline values (p < 0.05) but simvastatin was more effective than raloxifene (p < 0.005). None of the treatments had any significant effect on HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Only raloxifene significantly reduced Lp(a) [18% (1-36)] and ICAM-1 [17% (8-25)] and VCAM-1 [24% (15-33)] plasma levels compared to baseline (p = 0.019, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Hyperemic blood flow response on raloxifene was significantly higher compared to baseline [52% (0-105)], (p < 0.05), whereas no significant change was noted on simvastatin. Endothelium independent blood flow induced by nitroglycerine was not influenced by either active treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Raloxifene administration is associated with lower ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and Lp(a) plasma levels and enhanced endothelium dependent dilation compared to simvastatin although simvastatin is more powerful in total and LDL cholesterol reduction.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Simvastatin improves sepsis-induced mortality and acute kidney injury via renal vascular effects.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in about half of patients in septic shock and the mortality of AKI with sepsis is extremely high. An effective therapeutic intervention is urgently required. Statins are 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors that also have pleiotropic actions. They have been reported to increase the survival of septic or infectious patients. But the effect of simvastatin, a widely used statin, on sepsis-induced AKI is unknown. The effects of simvastatin and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha neutralizing antibody were studied in a clinically relevant model of sepsis-induced AKI using cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) in elderly mice. Simvastatin significantly improved CLP-induced mortality and AKI. Simvastatin attenuated CLP-induced tubular damage and reversed CLP-induced reduction of intrarenal microvascular perfusion and renal tubular hypoxia at 24 h. Simvastatin also restored towards normal CLP-induced renal vascular protein leak and serum TNF-alpha. Neither delayed simvastatin therapy nor TNF-alpha neutralizing antibody improved CLP-induced AKI. Simvastatin improved sepsis-induced AKI by direct effects on the renal vasculature, reversal of tubular hypoxia, and had a systemic anti-inflammatory effect.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed2006

Potent inhibition of small-cell lung cancer cell growth by simvastatin reveals selective functions of Ras isoforms in growth factor signalling.

The impact of the 3-hydroxy-3methylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin on human small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell growth and survival was investigated. Simvastatin profoundly impaired basal and growth factor-stimulated SCLC cell growth in vitro and induced apoptosis. SCLC cells treated with simvastatin were sensitized to the effects of the chemotherapeutic agent etoposide. Moreover, SCLC tumour growth in vivo was inhibited by simvastatin. These responses correlated with the inhibition of stem cell factor (SCF)-stimulated activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Erk), protein kinase B (PKB) and ribosomal S6 kinase by simvastatin. Constitutive activation of the Erk pathway was sufficient to rescue SCLC cell from the effects of simvastatin. The drug did not directly affect activation of c-Kit or its localization to lipid rafts, but in addition to its ability to block Ras membrane localization, it selectively downregulated H-Ras protein levels at the post-translational level. Downregulation of either H- or K-Ras by RNA interference (RNAi) did not impair Erk activation by growth factors, whereas an RNAi specific for N-Ras inhibited activation of Erk, PKB and SCLC cell growth. Together our data demonstrate that inhibiting Ras signalling with simvastatin potently disrupts growth and survival in human SCLC cells.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Simvastatin enhances hepatic nitric oxide production and decreases the hepatic vascular tone in patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In cirrhosis, an insufficient release of nitric oxide contributes to increased hepatic resistance and portal pressure and enhances the postprandial increase in portal pressure. We hypothesized that simvastatin, which enhances Akt-dependent endothelial nitric oxide synthase phosphorylation, may increase hepatic nitric oxide release and decrease hepatic resistance in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. METHODS: In protocol 1, 13 patients had measurements of the hepatic venous pressure gradient, hepatic blood flow, mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, and nitric oxide products before and 30 and 60 minutes after 40 mg of simvastatin. In protocol 2, 17 patients were randomized to receive placebo or simvastatin (40 mg) 12 hours and 1 hour before the study. After baseline measurements of the hepatic venous pressure gradient, hepatic blood flow, and nitric oxide products, a standard liquid meal was given, and measurements were repeated at 15, 30, and 45 minutes. RESULTS: In protocol 1, acute simvastatin did not modify the hepatic venous pressure gradient but increased the hepatic blood flow (21% +/- 13% at 30 minutes; P = 0.01) and decreased hepatic sinusoidal resistance by 14% +/- 11% (P = 0.04). Nitric oxide product levels significantly increased in hepatic venous blood (from 31.4 +/- 12.3 nmol. mL(-1) to 35.8 +/- 10.7 nmol. mL(-1); P = 0.04), but not in peripheral blood. Systemic hemodynamics were not modified. In protocol 2, simvastatin pretreatment significantly attenuated the postprandial increase in hepatic venous pressure gradient (mean peak increase, 10% +/- 9% vs. 21% +/- 6% in placebo; P = 0.01). Hepatic blood flow increased similarly in the 2 groups. Hepatic nitric oxide products increased in the simvastatin group but not in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin administration increases the hepatosplanchnic output of nitric oxide products and decreases hepatic resistance in patients with cirrhosis.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Association of polymorphism in the cytochrome CYP2D6 and the efficacy and tolerability of simvastatin.

OBJECTIVE: Because clinical data about the therapeutic consequences of polymorphic oxidation of simvastatin by CYP2D6 have not been well reported, we sought to investigate the possible link between polymorphism of CYP2D6 and the efficacy and tolerability of simvastatin treatment in a group of 88 patients with hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: The CYP2D6 genotype was determined with use of polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment analysis, whereas the CYP2D6 phenotype was determined by monitoring the dextromethorphan metabolism. RESULTS: Four of 5 patients with 2 defective CYP2D6 alleles discontinued the therapy at a low daily dose because of adverse events, with a significant mean decrease in the cholesterol levels of 0.23 mmol/L per milligram of simvastatin in the daily dose. In the group of 28 patients with 1 mutated CYP2D6 gene, 13 did not tolerate the therapy, whereas a mean decrease in the cholesterol levels of 0.20 mmol/L per milligram of simvastatin was found. One patient with a multiplication of the CYP2D6 gene showed a cholesterol reduction of only 0.01 mmol/L per milligram of simvastatin, at a maximal daily dose of 40 mg. Only 9 patients of the group of 54 persons who were homozygous for the wild-type allele discontinued the therapy because of intolerance. In that group, a mean decrease of cholesterol of 0.10 mmol/L per milligram of simvastatin was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide evidence that the cholesterol-lowering effect of simvastatin is influenced by CYP2D6 polymorphism. The clinical use of this knowledge may allow for more efficient individual therapies.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin compared with pravastatin and simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, 52-week trial.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this trial was to compare the efficacy of rosuvastatin with that of pravastatin and simvastatin for lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial, lipid levels were measured in 477 patients (baseline LDL-C > or =160 and <250 mg/dL) who received fixed doses of 5 mg of rosuvastatin, 10 mg of rosuvastatin, 20 mg of pravastatin, or 20 mg of simvastatin for 12 weeks. For an additional 40 weeks, individual daily doses were sequentially doubled to a maximum of 80 mg of rosuvastatin, 40 mg of pravastatin, and 80 mg of simvastatin, according to investigator discretion and if National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel II (ATP II) LDL-C goals were not achieved. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, percent LDL-C reductions after both 5-mg and 10-mg rosuvastatin treatment, which were 39.1% and 47.4%, respectively, were significantly different (P <.05) from LDL-C reductions after 20-mg pravastatin (26.5%) and 20-mg simvastatin (34.6%) treatment. After 52 weeks, more rosuvastatin-treated patients remained at their starting dose than did simvastatin or pravastatin patients. After dose titration, 88% and 87.5% of the rosuvastatin 5-mg and 10-mg groups, respectively, achieved their ATP II LDL-C goals, compared with 60% for pravastatin and 72.5% for simvastatin. All study treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Rosuvastatin reduced LDL-C levels more than pravastatin or simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia in a 52-week dose-titration study.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

No effect of simvastatin treatment on insulin sensitivity in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.

OBJECTIVE: Statins, in addition to cholesterol lowering, have nonlipid effects on formation and progression of atheromatous plaque. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia may have detrimental influences on the arterial wall. Statins (may also) inhibit insulin signal transferring in vascular smooth cell cultures. However, their effect on insulin sensitivity remains controversial. Therefore, we decided to investigate the effect of simvastatin on insulin sensitivity in hypercholesterolemic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with primary hypercholesterolemia were divided into simvastatin group (n = 9; 4 females, 5 males; BMI 30.6 +/- 4 kg/m2; mean ages 57 +/- 6 years) and placebo group (n = 9; 4 females, 5 males; BMI 28 +/- 2.9 kg/m2; mean ages 49 +/- 10 years). Simvastatin (20 mg/day) or placebo were given for 2 months. Total and HDL cholesterol were measured and LDL cholesterol was calculated by Friedewald formula. Insulin sensitivity was determined by using euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp technique [40 microU/m2/min insulin infusion rate; glucose disposal rate (M)= mg/kg/min] before and after treatment. RESULTS: Plasma levels of total, LDL and HDL cholesterol decreased significantly in simvastatin group after treatment (p = 0.000, p = 0.000, and p = 0.048, respectively). Plasma levels of total cholesterol decreased significantly (p = 0.032), whereas LDL and HDL levels remained unchanged in placebo group. M value (mg/kg/min) decreased insignificantly in simvastatin group (4.32 +/- 1.57 vs. 3.71 +/- 1.91) and increased in placebo group (3.55 +/- 1.91 vs. 3.95 +/- 0.95). CONCLUSION: Short-term simvastatin treatment did not affect insulin sensitivity determined by "gold standard" euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp method in hypercholesterolemic patients in this research. Further studies with simvastatin using higher doses and longer duration should be performed.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Anti-carcinogenic activity of simvastatin during the promotion phase of radiation-induced mammary tumorigenesis of rats.

Pregnant Wistar-MS rats received whole body irradiation with 2.6 Gy gamma-rays from a 60Co source at day 20 of pregnancy. Control rats were fed a basal diet and were implanted with a diethylstilbestrol (DES) pellet at 30 days after weaning. In the experimental group, rats were fed a diet containing simvastatin immediately after weaning and received a DES pellet at 30 days after weaning. A high incidence of total mammary tumours was observed in the rats fed the control diet and treated with DES for 1 year. The administration of dietary simvastatin together with DES treatment significantly decreased the incidence of mammary tumours. The development of adenocarcinoma in the control rats was significantly higher than that in the rats fed the simvastatin diet. After the administration of simvastatin to the experimental group for 1 year, the serum estradiol-17beta concentration in these rats was markedly reduced, but that of prolactin was not. No significant difference was seen in the development of the mammary glands between rats fed the control diet and those fed the simvastatin diet by whole mount observations. Simvastatin feeding produced an increased development of ER- PgR- tumours and a reduced incidence of ER+ PgR+ tumours. These findings suggest that simvastatin has a potent preventive activity during the DES-dependent promotion/progression phase of radiation-induced mammary tumorigenesis.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Lipid-lowering-independent effects of simvastatin on the kidney in experimental hypercholesterolaemia.

BACKGROUND: Hypercholesterolaemia (HC), an independent risk factor for renal injury, is associated with formation of oxidized low-density-lipoprotein (ox-LDL), increased oxidative-stress and renal inflammation. HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitors are commonly used in HC, but their effects on renal haemodynamics and function in HC are poorly understood. METHODS: Pigs were studied after a 12-week normal diet, a 2% high-cholesterol diet (HC) or an HC diet supplemented with simvastatin (HC+simvastatin, 80 mg/day) (n=6-8 each group). Renal haemodynamics and function were quantified in vivo with electron-beam computed tomography (EBCT). Shock-frozen renal tissue was subsequently studied using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: LDL cholesterol was similarly increased in HC and HC+simvastatin. Simvastatin-treated animals showed increased expression of endothelial nitric-oxide-synthase (eNOS), and decreased expression of the ox-LDL receptor LOX-1 in renal endothelial cells. Simvastatin also decreased tubular immunoreactivity of inducible-NOS, nitrotyrosine, nuclear-factor-kappaB, and tubuloglomerular trichrome staining. These were associated with a significant increase in cortical (6.1+/-0.1 vs 5.0+/-0.3 and 5.0+/-0.1 ml/min/cc, respectively, P<0.001) and medullary perfusion in HC+simvastatin compared to normal and HC. CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin attenuated the inflammatory and pro-oxidative environment as well as fibrosis in kidneys in pigs with diet-induced HC, in association with enhanced renal perfusion. These cholesterol-lowering-independent changes imply novel renoprotective effects of statins in the setting of HC and atherosclerosis.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2005

In vivo and in vitro effects of simvastatin on inflammatory markers in pre-dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of statins in reducing cardiovascular events have been attributed predominantly to their lipid-lowering effects, recent studies suggest that these effects might be due to their anti-inflammatory properties. We here investigate the in vivo and in vitro effects of simvastatin on cytokine production in pre-dialysis chronic renal failure patients. METHODS: Our clinical study has been designed as a randomized double-blind placebo controlled study. A total of 55 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients at stages 3 and 4 (mean creatinine clearance 45 ml/min, range 15-60) were randomly assigned to receive simvastatin 40 mg/day or placebo, added to their ongoing treatment, for 6 months. Blood samples were obtained at baseline, and after 3 and 6 months of observation for the determination of lipids, inflammatory markers and renal function. For the in vitro studies, the effect of increasing doses of simvastatin on cytokine production [namely interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8] in human cultured monocytes from 10 healthy subjects (HS) and 15 CKD patients stimulated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was investigated. RESULTS: A significant reduction in total cholesterol from 221+/-44 mg/dl to 184+/-41 mg/dl (3 months) and to 186+/-39 mg/dl (6 months) (P<0.02) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol from 139+/-40 mg/dl to 104+/-29 mg/dl (3 months) and to 100+/-31 mg/dl (6 months) (P<0.001) was observed in the 28 patients treated with simvastatin. In this group, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels significantly decreased from 2.6 mg/l [interquartile range (IQR 4.9)] to 2.0 mg/l (IQR 1.9) (P = 0.03) at 6 months (P<0.05). A parallel reduction of IL-6 levels from 5.1 pg/ml (IQR 3.8) to 3.5 pg/ml (IQR 3.1) (P = 0.001) at 6 months was also observed. No significant reduction in inflammatory markers [CRP from 5.1 mg/l (IQR 1.9) to 5.4 mg/l (IQR 1.3) (P = NS) at 6 months] or plasma lipids [LDL-cholesterol from 127+/-32 mg/dl to 131+/-21 mg/dl (6 months)] was observed in the 27 patients of the placebo group. In the in vitro studies, the average value for cell-associated IL-6 and IL-8 was higher in CKD (155+/-95 pg/ml monocytes for IL-6 and 722+/-921 pg/ml monocytes for IL-8) vs HS (137+/-87 pg/ml monocytes and 186+/-125 pg/ml monocytes) (P<0.01) and was not affected by simvastatin alone. LPS resulted in a significant increase in cytokine production (IL-6: 1954+/-321 pg/ml monocytes for CKD and 1451+/-237 pg/ml monocytes for HS; P<0.001); the simultaneous addition of increasing doses of simvastatin to these cultures induced a dose-dependent inhibition of IL-6 and IL-8 production in stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that simvastatin in commonly used doses has an in vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory effect in CKD patients, and may play an important role in counteracting the mechanisms involved on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease.

Biomarkers↗
PubMed1996

Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol lowering. Results from the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)

An analysis of the cost-effectiveness of simvastatin was conducted, based on the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). The total cost of hospitalization in the placebo group was 52.8 million Swedish kronor (SEK) (5.15 million pounds), compared with SEK 36.0 million (3.51 million pounds) in the simvastatin group. This amounts to a 32% reduction, or a saving of SEK 16.8 million (1.6 million pounds) or SEK 7560 (738 pounds) per patient. The net cost per patient for the duration of the study (5.4 years) was SEK 13,540 (1324 pounds). Simvastatin treatment saved an estimated 0.377 undiscounted life years (0.240 life years discounted at 5% per annum). The cost of simvastatin therapy per discounted life-year saved was therefore SEK 56,400 (5502 pounds). Sensitivity analysis, examining the effect of different life expectancies, costs of initiation and monitoring of simvastatin therapy, and discount rates, showed the results to be stable. Conclusion. The cost per life-year saved of simvastatin in the treatment of post-myocardial infarction and angina patients, as determined from 4S data, is well within the range normally considered cost-effective.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗
PubMed1999

Atorvastatin compared with simvastatin-based therapies in the management of severe familial hyperlipidaemias.

We compared atorvastatin with simvastatin-based therapies in a prospective observational study of 201 patients with severe hyperlipidaemia. Atorvastatin 10 mg therapy was substituted for simvastatin 20 mg, 20 mg for 40 mg, 40 mg for simvastatin 40 mg plus resin, and 80 mg for simvastatin-fibrate-resin therapy. Lipid and safety profiles were assessed. Atorvastatin reduced total cholesterol by 31 +/- 11-40 +/- 14% vs. 25 +/- 12-31 +/- 11%; LDL by 38 +/- 16-45 +/- 18% vs. 31 +/- 18-39 +/- 18% and geometric mean triglycerides by 29.3-37.3% vs. 16.6-24.8%, but reduced HDL 11% +/- 47% at 80 mg compared with a 16% +/- 34% increase with simvastatin-based therapy. Target LDL < 3.5 mmol/l was achieved more often with atorvastatin (63% vs. 50%; p < 0.001). Atorvastatin increased geometric mean fibrinogen by 12-20% vs. a 0-6% fall with simvastatin (p << 0.001). Side effects were noted in 10-36% of patients, including one case of rhabdomyolysis, and 36% discontinued therapy. These data suggest that atorvastatin is more effective than current simvastatin-based therapies in achieving treatment targets in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia but at the expense of a possible increase in side-effects. This issue needs further study in randomized controlled trials.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗