Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Pathologic complete response - pCR”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Outcome of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy and surgery for resectable lingual squamous cell carcinoma greater than 3 cm: the possibility of less extensive surgery.

We present the outcome of treatment with preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy and surgery for resectable lingual squamous cell carcinoma more than 3 cm in its greatest dimension. Twenty patients were enrolled in this study between June 2001 and August 2004. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy included intraarterial pirarubicin (THP) (5 mg/day), intravenous continuous 5-FU, and radiation, usually followed by surgery. Complete response rate was 100%. Notably, 8 of 12 patients who underwent surgery exhibited pathologically complete response, though three patients developed recurrence or distant metastasis. The main adverse effects were mucositis (13/20) and leucopenia (9/20), both of which were acceptable. Although long-term results should be considered, our treatment method appears very useful for lingual squamous cell carcinoma greater than 3 cm, with a remarkably high rate of pathological local control and acceptable adverse events.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Prolonged neoadjuvant chemotherapy with GM-CSF in locally advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Usually three to four cycles of conventional-dose neoadjuvant chemotherapy are administered prior to local therapy, and another three cycles thereafter. In an attempt to improve results, we increased the dosages and applied GM-CSF, which, besides being a hematopoietic growth factor, has become increasingly known for its immunostimulatory effects, which might enhance the antitumor effect. METHODS: Forty-two patients with stage IIIA or IIIB breast cancer were treated with doxorubicin (A) (90 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (C) (1,000 mg/m2) at three-weekly intervals. In the second and fourth cycle a 10% dose reduction of both agents was applied. On the second day GM-CSF 250 micrograms/m2/day was started and given for 10 days. Initially, some patients were treated with < or = four cycles, but as the study progressed and toxicity appeared tolerable, six cycles were given whenever possible. After the chemotherapy, patients underwent surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. RESULTS: The response rate for the whole group to AC was 98% (95% confidence interval 94%-100%), with a clinical complete response rate of 50% (95% confidence interval 35%-65%). Six patients had a pathological complete response. Median follow-up from the start of chemotherapy is 49 months (range 10-100). The disease-free survival (DFS) at three years is 57% and the overall survival (OS) at three years is 79%. There is a significant trend for improved DFS (p = 0.0000) and OS (p = 0.0002) with increasing number of cycles. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study with neoadjuvant dose-intensive AC chemotherapy and GM-CSF compare favorably with previous studies in patients with LABC. This is most apparent in patients who received six cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We hypothesize that these encouraging results are probably related to the prolonged presence of the primary tumor, and to the long-term administration of GM-CSF with the primary tumor and axillary lymph nodes in situ. Therefore, a randomized study is warranted. We already initiated an international randomized trial in patients with LABC in order to answer two questions. First, does prolonged neoadjuvant chemotherapy result in an improved DFS and OS in comparison with the conventional approach, and secondly, what is the effect of GM-CSF in this approach in comparison with G-CSF?

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Paclitaxel-based chemoradiotherapy in localized gastric carcinoma: degree of pathologic response and not clinical parameters dictated patient outcome.

PURPOSE: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy may increase the R0 (curative) resection rate, overall survival (OS) duration, and disease-free survival (DFS) duration. We evaluated paclitaxel-based induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in patients with localized gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma to determine its feasibility, impact on the R0 resection rate, type of pathologic response, OS, and DFS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with operable, localized gastric, or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma were eligible. Staging included endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and laparoscopy. Patients received two 28-day cycles of induction chemotherapy of fluorouracil, paclitaxel, and cisplatin followed by 45 Gy of radiation and concurrent fluorouracil plus paclitaxel. The cancer was restaged and surgery was attempted. Postsurgery pathologic findings and R0 resection were correlated with OS and DFS. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were enrolled. Most carcinomas were proximal (83%) and pretreatment stage EUST3 (85%). Forty patients (98%) underwent surgery, and 78% had an R0 resection. We observed a pathologic complete response (pathCR) rate of 20% and a pathologic partial response (pathPR) rate of 15% (< 10% residual cancer cells in the resected specimen). No pretreatment parameter (sex, cancer location, baseline T stage, or baseline N stage) predicted the type of postsurgery pathologic response, OS, or DFS. However, pathCR (P = .02), pathCR + pathPR (P = .006), R0 resection (P < .001), and postsurgery T and N stages (P = .01 and P < .001, respectively) were associated with OS. Same parameters were significantly correlated with DFS. Toxicity was manageable. CONCLUSION: The type of pathologic response but not pretreatment parameters was associated with OS and DFS. Efforts to increase the rate of pathologic response and better systemic cancer control are warranted.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1997

Preoperative chemotherapy versus surgical therapy alone for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a prospective randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the role of preoperative chemotherapy in squamous cell cancer of the esophagus. METHODS: A prospective randomized trial was undertaken in 147 patients: 74 received preoperative chemotherapy comprising cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil and 73 had surgical therapy alone. End points were cancer and therapy-related deaths. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (89%) in the chemotherapy group underwent resection compared with 69 (95%) in the control group (p = not significant). Of the 60 patients who had resection after completing the chemotherapy program, 35 (58%) had a significant response, of whom four (6.7%) had a complete pathologic response. Postoperative mortality rates were 8.3% and 8.7% in the chemotherapy and control groups, respectively (p = not significant). Significant downstaging was evident with chemotherapy; curative resections were possible in 67% of these patients compared with 35% in the control group (p = 0.0003). T3 and T4 tumors were found in 67% and 91% of the chemotherapy and control groups, respectively (p = 0.0002). The respective figures for N1 disease were 70% and 88% (p = 0.009). An intent-to-treat analysis of survival showed no significant difference between the two groups. Median survivals were 16.8 and 13 months, respectively (p = 0.17). Of those who completed the chemotherapy and resection, responders fared better than control patients. Median survivals were 42.2 months and 13.8 months, respectively (p = 0.003). Median survival (8.3 months) was worse for nonresponders than for control patients (p = 0.03). The recurrence pattern suggested a significant reduction in locoregional disease with chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative chemotherapy was safe and resulted in significant downstaging and an increased likelihood of curative resection. Survival was not better than that in the surgery-alone group, but responders did fare better than nonresponders.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Is there still a role for neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer?

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer is firmly established. There is now also an emerging role for neoadjuvant systemic therapy in the treatment of operable breast cancer. There is good evidence that the chances of breast conserving surgery can be increased with this approach and results of randomised studies indicate that survival is at least as good with neoadjuvant as with adjuvant chemotherapy. Similar clinical data are emerging with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. For the future, there are important potential advantages in having an in vivo measure of chemosensitivity rather than blindly treating micrometastatic disease in the adjuvant setting. Clinical response to neoadjuvant treatment, and in particular complete pathological response, are predictors of subsequent outcome. Pathological involvement of axillary nodes following neoadjuvant therapy portends a poor prognosis. The potential for biological surrogate markers of response to predict for long-term outcome may allow individualisation of systemic treatment and the rapid assessment of new drugs in early breast cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed2004

High curative resection rate with weekly cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin, 6S-leucovorin, glutathione, and filgastrim in patients with locally advanced, unresectable gastric cancer: a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD).

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of a weekly preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced, unresectable gastric cancer. In all, 82 patients with an Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group PS <or=2 and normal cardiac function were enrolled onto the study. Surgical unresectability was confirmed in 52 patients (63%) at laparotomy, and in 30 (27%) cases by CT scan of the abdomen and endoscopic ultrasonography. Chemotherapy treatment was: cisplatin 40 mg x m(-2); 5-fluorouracil 500 mg x m(-2); epidoxorubicin 35 mg x m(-2); 6S-leucovorin 250 mg x m(-2) and glutathione 1.5 g x m(-2) (PELF). One cycle consisted of 8 weekly treatments. Response to chemotherapy was observed in 40 of 82 patients (49%): six (7%) complete and 34 (41%) partial responses, and in four (5%) cases a complete pathological response was confirmed. Of the 40 responding patients, 37 (45%) had potentially curative surgery. Grade 3/4 leucopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in three and two patients. At a median follow-up of 48 months, 25 of the 37 resected patients (68%) were alive and 24 (65%) were disease free. The median and 4-year survival for the whole group was 17 months and 31%, respectively. The median survival was 12 months for inoperable patients and it was not reached in resected patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Phase II trial combining docetaxel and doxorubicin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to assess the antitumour activity of docetaxel in combination with doxorubicin for neoadjuvant therapy of patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight women were treated with intravenous doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) over 15 min followed by a 1-h infusion of docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for six cycles. Dexamethasone or prednisolone premedication was allowed. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was not allowed as primary prophylaxis. The primary end point was the pathologically documented complete response rate (pathological response). RESULTS: The mean relative dose intensity calculated for four or more cycles was 0.99 for doxorubicin and 0.99 for docetaxel. Overall, the pathological response rate was 13%. There were 11 complete and 29 partial clinical responses for an overall response rate of 85% [95% confidence interval (CI) 75% to 95%] in the evaluable population (n = 47). Disease-free and overall survival rates were 85% (95% CI 71% to 94%) and 96% (95% CI 85% to 99%), respectively, after a median follow-up of 36.6 months. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 65% of patients and 17% reported grade 4 febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel and doxorubicin is an effective and well-tolerated combination in the neoadjuvant therapy of breast cancer. Future controlled trials are warranted to investigate the best schedules and to correlate response with biological factors.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

A phase II study of epirubicin, vinorelbine and cisplatin in advanced breast cancer.

Our objective was to evaluate the activity and safety of the combination of cisplatin, epirubicin and vinorelbine (CEV) in advanced breast cancer patients. Patients with advanced breast cancer, locally advanced or metastatic, received epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on day 8. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. A total of 35 patients were treated. Thirty-one patients were evaluated for response. One hundred and fifty-five cycles of chemotherapy were administered overall. The objective response rate (ORR) was 84%, including complete response in 13% of patients. All stage III patients achieved a downstaging, with a pathological complete response in two out of 10 patients. Patients with stage IV disease obtained objective response in 67% of cases. Toxicity was mild to moderate. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was febrile neutropenia, which occurred in 17% of patients. We conclude that CEV combination represents an effective treatment for patients with previously untreated advanced breast cancer, allowing an important ORR. Moreover this regimen appears to be well tolerated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Chemotherapy (CAP) for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer and second-effort surgery in the second look.

Seventy-two patients with advanced ovarian cancer received CAP chemotherapy followed by laparotomy and 'second-effort' surgery. The overall response to CAP therapy was 80%. A complete pathological response (CPR) was obtained in 16 patients and partial microscopic (PMiR) and macroscopic responses in 7 and 33 cases, respectively. The actuarial survival for the entire group was 36% at 50 months with a median survival of 34 months. No significant differences in survival between the CPR and PMiR groups were found. Radical second-effort surgery showed a somewhat beneficial effect. The tumor size before chemotherapy (less than 5 cm) and FIGO stage III had a significantly favorable effect on response rate and survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) and paclitaxel in locally advanced breast cancer: a phase II study by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: To determine the activity and safety of the combination of paclitaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter phase II study. Thirty-five newly diagnosed patients with locally advanced breast cancer were included in the study. Histological or cytological diagnosis was necessary for inclusion. Median age was 54 years (range 26-73 years). Fifteen patients were premenopausal and 20 postmenopausal. Paclitaxel was administered at a dose of 175 mg/m(2) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 35 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for six cycles. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (71%) responded. Six (17%) had a complete response, 19 (54%) had a partial response, four remained stable, two progressed and four were not evaluated for response due to discontinuation of chemotherapy. Three patients had a pathologically complete response. A total of 173 cycles were administered. The primary toxicity observed was skin toxicity. Grade 3 skin toxicity was noted in four patients (11%). Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) grade 3 was experienced by three (9%). Two patients presented with PPE and skin toxicity. Hematological toxicities included grade 3 leukopenia in four patients (3%). Other grade 3 toxicities were uncommon and included only alopecia in 29 patients (83%). Grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity was not observed in any patient. Dose reduction was necessary in seven patients; in six due to skin toxicity and in one due to neutropenia. Four patients discontinued treatment due to skin toxicity. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and paclitaxel was active in locally advanced breast cancer. The primary toxicity was cutaneous toxicity and it was manageable.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Complete response following preoperative chemotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer: accuracy of clinical assessment using the French trial database.

BACKGROUND: Pathologic complete response (CR) to preoperative chemotherapy has been shown to be a strong prognostic factor in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This preoperative setting offers the opportunity to evaluate the clinical prediction of CR by investigators and an evaluation committee (EC) using the "gold standard" pathologic examination as the reference. The only published large randomized trial of preoperative chemotherapy (to our knowledge), the French neoadjuvant study, constitutes an interesting database to evaluate CT scan-based CR assessment. STUDY OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN: The French trial compared mitomycin-ifosfamide-cisplatin followed by surgery with surgery alone in stage I (except T1N0) to IIIa resectable NSCLC. Response was prospectively assessed in all patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy by the investigator in charge of the patient and by an EC, and was compared with pathologic postoperative data. RESULTS: In the preoperative chemotherapy study, 167 patients were operated on. Nineteen patients were found to have a pathologic CR. Only seven patients were classified as having a CR by investigators and five patients by the EC. Evaluation of CR was correct in six of these seven cases and in three of these five cases, respectively. Sensitivity of the CR diagnosis was 31.6% for investigators and 15.8% for the EC. Specificities of the CR diagnosis were 99.4% and 98.8%, respectively. Positive predictive values were 85.7% and 60%, respectively. Negative predictive values were 91.9% and 90.1%, respectively. Accuracies were 91.6% and 89.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Investigator assessment of CR was highly predictive of pathologic CR. However, this study showed that clinical CT scan-based assessment, whether performed by investigators or the EC, underestimated the frequency of CR after preoperative chemotherapy in resectable NSCLC.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1986

Treatment of locally advanced breast cancer using primary induction chemotherapy with hormonal synchronization followed by radiation therapy with or without debulking surgery.

Fifty-one patients with stage IIIA or IIIB locally advanced breast cancer received primary induction chemotherapy (hormonal synchronization, 46 patients) to a maximum objective clinical response before proceeding to local therapy. Patients achieving a pathological complete response (CR) received radiation therapy, while patients with residual disease, partial response (PR), or stable disease (NC) received debulking surgery prior to radiation therapy; in all patients, 6 additional months of chemotherapy were administered. Chemotherapy consisted of cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2 iv) and doxorubicin (30 mg/m2 iv) on day 1; tamoxifen (40 mg/m2 orally) on days 2-6; Premarin (0.625 mg/m2 orally) every 12 hours for three doses, beginning on day 7; and methotrexate (300 mg/m2 iv) followed in 1 hour by 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m2 iv) on day 8 and leucovorin rescue (10 mg/m2 orally) every 6 hours for six doses, beginning 24 hours after methotrexate. Fifty patients are evaluable with respect to response, time to disease progression, and survival. The rate of objective response to chemotherapy was 90%; 52% of the patients had CR, 38% had PR, and 10% had NC. The median numbers of chemotherapy cycles to achieve CR, PR, and NC were five, four, and four, respectively. Twenty-four patients with CR to chemotherapy were pathologically assessed, 22 by multiple biopsies and 2 by mastectomy. Seventy-one percent of the patients were proven to have pathological CR. All patients completing combined therapy thus far are disease free. Nine of 29 patients with stage IIIB disease have relapsed; 7 of 23 with inflammatory histology have relapsed; and 2 of 20 with stage IIIA disease have relapsed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2001

Early toxicity from preoperative radiotherapy with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil for resectable adenocarcinoma of the rectum: a Phase II trial for the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To assess the toxicity and the efficacy of preoperative radiotherapy with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients had newly diagnosed localized adenocarcinoma of the rectum within 12 cm of the anal verge, Stage T3-4, and were suitable for curative resection. Eighty-two patients were treated with radiotherapy-50.4 Gy in 28 fractions in 5.6 weeks, given concurrently with continuous infusion 5-FU, using either 96-h/week infusion at 300 mg/m(2)/day or 7-days/week infusion at 225 mg/m(2)/day. RESULTS: The median age was 59 years (range, 27-87), and 67% of patients were male. Pretreatment stages of the rectal cancer were T3, 89% and resectable T4, 11%, with endorectal ultrasound confirmation in 67% of patients. Grade 3 acute toxicity occurred in 5 of 82 patients (6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2-14%). Types of surgical resection were anterior resection, 61%; abdominoperineal resection, 35%; and other procedures, 4%. There was no operative mortality. Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection occurred in 3 of 50 patients (6%; 95% CI, 1-17%). The pathologic complete response rate was 16% (95% CI, 9-26%). Pathologic Stages T2 or less occurred in 51%. CONCLUSION: Preoperative radiotherapy with continuous infusion 5-FU for locally advanced rectal cancer is a safe regimen, with a significant downstaging effect. It does not seem to lead to a significant increase in serious surgical complications.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2000

Preoperative ECF chemotherapy in gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Epirubicin, cisplatin and continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion (ECF) has been reported to result in high clinical response rates in advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma and is currently the 'gold standard' chemotherapy regimen for this tumour site. Despite this, its role as preoperative (neoadjuvant) treatment is unproven and therefore remains under investigation. We report our experience using ECF (intravenous epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, with continuous infusion of 5-FU 200 mg/m2 per day) as preoperative treatment in locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the lower oesophagus, gastro-oesophageal junction and stomach. Of the 23 patients treated (median age 54 years), 19 had potentially resectable disease, four were unresectable and seven had radiological evidence of lymph node involvement. A median of four cycles of ECF was delivered (range 1-6). Ten of 12 patients (83%) with dysphagia reported improvement of symptoms. Clinical disease progression occurred in six patients (26%) during chemotherapy. WHO grade 3 or 4 toxicity occurred in six patients (26%): four haematological, one mucositis, one vomiting. Seventeen patients (74%) proceeded to surgery; 14 (61%) were resected and three were unresectable. There were two (12%) postoperative deaths from respiratory failure. Major pathological response was seen in three patients (13%): one pathological complete response, two microscopic residual disease. Two patients had Stage II (T2N(0-1)) disease and nine were Stage III (T(3-4)N(0-1)). None of the patients with initially unresectable disease was rendered resectable. After a median follow-up interval of 33 months (range 26-53), the overall median survival was 12 months and 2-year survival was 30%. All patients who were initially unresectable or had radiological evidence of lymph node involvement have died. Therefore, despite good symptomatic response rates, ECF chemotherapy given in the preoperative setting did not appear to improve the outcome of patients with unresectable or radiologically lymph node-positive gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. The role of ECF chemotherapy in resectable tumours is unclear and is currently under investigation in the randomized MRC Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy (MAGIC) study.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

Pathologic changes in breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: implications for the assessment of response.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (also known as preoperative or primary chemotherapy) is the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced breast cancer. One of the main advantages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is that it allows for assessment of pathologic response to treatment. Clinical and radiologic evaluations of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy are based on change in tumor size, and the correlation with pathologic response is often inaccurate. Pathologic evaluation of tumor size remains the gold standard for evaluation of residual tumor after chemotherapy. Chemotherapy-induced histomorphologic change is commonly observed in posttreatment resection specimens and can contribute to the less-than-perfect correlation between the clinical assessment of tumor size and the pathologic measurement. Therefore, accurate histologic mapping to the macroscopic and radiologic appearance of the tumor bed is necessary. Cytopathologic changes are also common in residual cancer cells after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and have uncertain clinical relevance. There is a role for the development of new histologic approaches to augment the pathologic and clinical assessment and provide information on the differential response, particularly for tumors in which less than pathologic complete response is achieved.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1990

[Ovarian carcinoma: current therapeutic aspects. A review].

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of gynaecologic cancer death and the fourth most frequent cause of cancer death in women. 70% of all ovarian cancers will be diagnosed only at an advanced stage of the disease despite the improvements in diagnostic tools. Standard therapeutic concepts and new therapeutic modalities are discussed. Staging laparotomy with cytoreductive surgery is the most important part of initial patient management. Second-look operation has recently come under criticism, as it probably offers only minor therapeutic benefit. However, it remains the golden rule for evaluating different therapy modalities in the setting of a clinical trial. After surgery, chemotherapy is indicated for all patients with ovarian cancer FIGO stage III and IV. The question whether all patients with stage I and II disease need additional treatment remains unresolved. The standard regimen for patients with advanced ovarian cancer consists of six months' chemotherapy with a combination of cisplatin and an alkylating agent. Current cisplatin containing regimens achieve a clinical response rate of 60-80% and a documented pathologic complete response rate of 30% overall. Despite higher overall response rates and increased disease-free survival rates with cisplatinum combinations, long term survival is not significantly altered. Investigative approaches with intraperitoneal chemotherapy, biologic response modifiers and drug resistance modifiers may open new therapeutic avenues for this challenging disease. Radiotherapy (open field technique) also represents a highly active and curative treatment modality for certain ovarian cancer patients. Nowadays radiotherapy is mainly used as adjuvant treatment for patients with low risk early stage disease and as consolidation treatment for patients with complete remission after chemotherapy and second-look operation.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Unique gene expression profile based on pathologic response in epithelial ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: We investigated whether tumor tissue obtained at diagnosis expresses a specific gene profile that is predictive of findings at second-look surgery in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tumor tissue obtained at the time of diagnosis was profiled with oligonucleotide microarrays. Class prediction analysis was performed in a training set of 24 patients who had undergone a second-look procedure. The resultant predictive signature was then tested on an independent validation set comprised of 36 patients. RESULTS: A 93-gene signature referred to as the Chemotherapy Response Profile (CRP) was identified through its association with pathologic complete response. When applied to a separate validation set, the CRP distinguished between patients with unfavorable versus favorable overall survival (median 41 months v not yet reached, respectively, log-rank P = .007), with a median follow-up of 52 months. The signature maintained independent prognostic value in multivariate analysis, controlling for other known prognostic factors such as age, stage, grade, and debulking status. There was no genetic overlap between the CRP and our previously described Ovarian Cancer Prognostic Profile (OCPP), which demonstrated similar prognostic value. The combination of the CRP and OCPP yielded better prognostic discrimination then either profile alone. Genes present in the CRP include BAX, a proapoptotic protein previously associated with chemotherapy response in ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION: Identification of a gene expression profile based on pathologic response in EOC provides independent prognostic information and offers potential insights into the mechanism of drug resistance. Efforts to identify a more tailored profile using selected genes from both the CRP and OCPP are underway.

Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell↗
PubMed1997

Ifosfamide plus cisplatin as primary chemotherapy of advanced ovarian cancer.

We have performed a phase II study to evaluate the activity and toxicity of ifosfamide and cisplatin as first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. Patients were treated with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and ifosfamide 5 g/m2 in 18-hr continuous infusion on day 1 or 1.5 g/m2 bolus on days 1-5. Between August 1988 and March 1990, 30 women were entered in the trial, 26 of them with measurable disease. The overall clinical response rate was 69% (95% CI: 48-85%), including 34.6% complete responses (95% CI:17-55%). Reassessment laparotomy was performed in 12 cases, and 4 (33%) exhibited a pathologic complete response. For all patients, the median duration of progression-free survival was 14 months, and the median overall survival was 25 months. There were no major differences in the response rate or survival between the two ifosfamide administration modalities. Relevant toxicities were grade IV hematologic toxicity in 11/30 patients and grade IV renal toxicity in 2/30 patients. A patient with grade IV encephalopathy developed a trauma-related cerebral hemorrhage and died 2 months later. The combination of ifosfamide and cisplatin is active in first-line therapy in advanced ovarian cancer, although it does not seem to improve the efficacy or toxicity profile of conventional combinations.

Adult↗