Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PROSTATECTOMY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Prognostic indicators in patients with seminal vesicle involvement following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We identify prognostic factors in patients with seminal vesicle involvement and negative lymph nodes following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 93 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and had seminal vesicle invasion without lymph node metastasis were evaluated. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant/adjuvant hormonal or radiation therapy were excluded from study. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen Gleason score, surgical margin status, presence of extraprostatic extension and evidence of biochemical disease progression were determined prospectively. Biochemical failure was defined as a single serum PSA elevation greater than 0.4 ng./ml. RESULTS: The presence of positive surgical margins (p = 0.001), and Gleason score 7 or higher from preoperative biopsies (p = 0.03) and from the radical prostatectomy specimen (p = 0.01) were significant predictors of disease progression at a median followup of 43.3 months. Patients with preoperative PSA less than 10 ng./ml. had a better disease-free survival (p = 0.07). On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for biopsy Gleason score, prostatectomy Gleason score and serum PSA, positive surgical margins remained a statistically significant predictor of disease progression (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical margin status is an independent predictor of disease recurrence in patients with seminal vesicle involvement and negative lymph nodes following radical prostatectomy. Serum PSA 10 ng./ml. or greater and specimen Gleason score 7 or greater also were adverse prognostic factors in these patients. Conversely, patients with negative surgical margins and lymph nodes have a better prognosis than previously expected, despite seminal vesicle invasion.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Prostate specific antigen levels in the follow up of localised prostate cancer: how does radiotherapy compare to radical prostatectomy?

This study aimed to evaluate tumor progression as assessed by PSA level of curative treatment for localised prostate cancer by either radiotherapy or prostatectomy. From 1987 to 1993, 180 patients were treated for clinically localised prostate cancer either by radiotherapy or prostatectomy. One hundred and five patients with clinical T1T2N0M0 were eligible for this study. Forty five underwent external beam radiotherapy and 60 had a radical prostatectomy. After radiotherapy PSA slowly decreased to reach a nadir 18 months after treatment. Any subsequent increase from this lowest post treatment level is associated with tumor progression. After radical prostatectomy PSA becomes undetectable and any increase will be regarded as evidence of tumor progression. The median PSA level before treatment and the median length of follow-up were comparable for the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival and biological evidence of disease progression at 5 y. Analysis of the evolution of median PSA level shows a progressive decline during the 4 y after radiotherapy. After radical prostatectomy PSA become undetectable, 4 y after treatment PSA levels become comparable in the two groups. The biochemical free survival was 60% for the prostatectomy group and 62% for the radiotherapy group. PSA is an effective marker of tumour progression after surgery or radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer. In our retrospective study recurrence rates at 5 y were not significant but direct comparisons are limited due to the Gleason score of the two groups. PSA levels can take up to 4 y to reach a nadir after radiotherapy.

Journal Article↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Case selection and outcome of radical perineal prostatectomy in localized prostate cancer.

Radical prostatectomy continues to play a central role in the management of localized prostate cancer. The majority of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer will undergo radical prostatectomy. A decrease in the morbidity of this surgical procedure has been accomplished through an improved understanding of pelvic anatomy and a greater understanding of the natural history of prostate cancer. Recently, minimally invasive techniques have been applied to radical prostatectomy (laparoscopic prostatectomy) in order to further decrease the morbidity of this operation. What remains to be determined is whether this approach confers the same long term surgical outcomes as the open approach. One method which offers known long term outcomes coupled with decreased morbidity is the radical perineal prostatectomy. The purpose of this paper is to review the criteria for patient selection as well as outcomes of the radical perineal prostatectomy.

Journal Article↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Pertinent issues related to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: We describe the critical steps of the laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) technique and discuss how they impact upon the pertinent issues regarding prostate cancer surgery: blood loss, potency and continence. RESULTS: A major advantage of LRP is the reduced operative blood loss. The precise placement of the dorsal vein complex stitch associated with the tamponading effect of the CO(2) pneumoperitoneum significantly decrease venous bleeding, which is the main source of blood loss during radical prostatectomy. At the Cleveland Clinic, the average blood loss of our first 100 patients was 322.5 ml, resulting in low transfusion rates. The continuous venous bleeding narrowed pelvic surgical field and poor visibility can adversely impact on nerve preservation during open radical prostatectomy. Laparoscopy, with its enhanced and magnified vision in a relatively bloodless field allows for excellent identification and handling of the neurovascular bundles. During open retropubic radical prostatectomy, the pubic bone may impair visibility and access to the urethral stump, and the surgeon must tie the knots relying on tactile sensation alone. Consequently, open prostatectomy is associated with a prolonged catheterization period of 2 - 3 weeks. Comparatively, during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy all sutures are meticulously placed and each is tied under complete visual control, resulting in a precise mucosa-to-mucosa approximation. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach may represent a reliable less invasive alternative to the conventional open approach. Despite the encouraging preliminary anatomical and functional outcomes, prospective randomized comparative trials are required to critically evaluate the role of laparoscopy for this sophisticated and delicate operation.

Journal Article↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Simultaneous extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and intraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with mesh.

OBJECTIVE: This report depicts the feasibility of the concomitant repair of a large direct inguinal hernia with mesh by using the intraperitoneal onlay approach after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. METHODS: A 66-year-old man with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate was referred for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The patient also had a 4-cm right, direct inguinal hernia, found on physical examination. To minimize the risk of infection of the mesh, an extraperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy was performed in the standard fashion after which transperitoneal access was obtained for the hernia repair. The hernia repair was completed by reduction of the hernia sac, followed by prosthetic mesh onlay. In this fashion, the peritoneum separated the prostatectomy space from the mesh. A single preoperative and postoperative dose of cefazolin was administered. RESULTS: The procedure was completed with no difficulty. Total operative time was 4.5 hours with an estimated blood loss of 450 mL. The final pathology revealed pT2cN0M0 prostate cancer with negative margins. No infectious or bowel complications occurred. At 10-month follow-up, no evidence existed of recurrence of prostate cancer or the hernia. CONCLUSION: Concomitant intraperitoneal laparoscopic mesh hernia repair and extraperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy are feasible. This can decrease the risk of potential infectious complications by separating the mesh from the space of Retzius where the prostatectomy is performed and the lower urinary tract is opened.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

CONTEXT: The natural history of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy can be long but variable. Better risk assessment models are needed to identify men who are at high risk for prostate cancer death early and who may benefit from aggressive salvage treatment and to identify men who are at low risk for prostate cancer death and can be safely observed. OBJECTIVES: To define risk factors for prostate cancer death following radical prostatectomy and to develop tables to risk stratify for prostate cancer-specific survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective cohort study of 379 men who had undergone radical prostatectomy at an urban tertiary care hospital between 1982 and 2000 and who had a biochemical recurrence and after biochemical failure had at least 2 prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values at least 3 months apart in order to calculate PSA doubling time (PSADT). The mean (SD) follow-up after surgery was 10.3 (4.7) years and median follow-up was 10 years (range, 1-20 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Prostate cancer-specific mortality. RESULTS: Median survival had not been reached after 16 years of follow-up after biochemical recurrence. Prostate-specific doubling time (<3.0 vs 3.0-8.9 vs 9.0-14.9 vs > or =15.0 months), pathological Gleason score (< or =7 vs 8-10), and time from surgery to biochemical recurrence (< or =3 vs >3 years) were all significant risk factors for time to prostate-specific mortality. Using these 3 variables, tables were constructed to estimate the risk of prostate cancer-specific survival at year 15 after biochemical recurrence. CONCLUSION: Clinical parameters (PSADT, pathological Gleason score, and time from surgery to biochemical recurrence) can help risk stratify patients for prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. These preliminary findings may serve as useful guides to patients and their physicians to identify patients at high risk for prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy to enroll them in early aggressive treatment trials. In addition, these preliminary findings highlight that survival in low-risk patients can be quite prolonged.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Role of radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer of high Gleason score.

BACKGROUND: The routine use of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing combined with digital rectal examination has lowered tumor volume and clinical-pathological stage of men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Therefore, we may identify more men with poorly differentiated tumors of early clinical stage. In order to identify those who may benefit from radical prostatectomy, we evaluated known prognostic variables in patients with prostate cancer of high Gleason score (8-10). METHODS: Of 652 patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy as monotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer between March 1991-December 1995, 84 patients with prostatectomy specimen Gleason score 8-10 tumors were identified. Clinical-pathological data were obtained from our prostate cancer database. Gleason score, PSA level, margin status, pathologic stage, and tumor volume were analyzed as general prognostic variables for disease-free survival (DFS). Follow-up ranged from 13-84 months (median, 36.2). Biochemical recurrence was defined as a postoperative PSA elevation greater than 0.4 ng/ml. RESULTS: The DFS for patients with Gleason score 8-10 and pathologically organ-confined disease was 62.5%. DFS was 56.2% for patients with PSA < or =10 ng/ml, compared to 19.2% for patients with serum PSA >10 ng/ml (P = 0.009). Patients with nonspecimen-confined disease (positive margins) had a DFS rate of 26.6% vs. 55% for patients with specimen-confined disease (negative margins) (P = 0.009). On multivariable analysis, only preoperative PSA < or =10 ng/ml (P = 0.02) and surgical margin status (P = 0.04) were significant predictors of DFS. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical margin status and preoperative serum PSA level are independent predictors of DFS for patients with high Gleason score prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy as monotherapy. Patients with poorly differentiated prostate cancer treated surgically at an early stage can have a favorable prognosis, especially if negative surgical margins are obtained. A preoperative serum PSA level < or =10 ng/ml carries the greatest likelihood of achieving prolonged DFS in this group of patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience and preliminary assessment after 65 operations.

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to evaluate the technical feasibility, oncological efficacy, and intraoperative and postoperative morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. METHODS: We describe an original technique of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed in 65 successive patients during 11 months. RESULTS: Radical prostatectomy was performed entirely by laparoscopy in 59 patients (91%). The median operating time was 265 min, including times for lymphadenectomy performed in 33% of patients. Preoperative complications included one rectal injury, sutured laparoscopically with an uneventful postoperative course, and one epigastric artery injury which needed secondary open procedure. The transfusion rate was 15.4% (10 patients). Median postoperative vesical catheterization lasted 7 days. The reduction of postoperative pain allowed rapid discharge of patients, by the fourth postoperative day in 60% of consenting patients. As regards oncological results, resection margins were negative in 57 patients (87.7%). The last prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay was undetectable (<0.1 ng/ml) in 85.7% of the 42 patients in whom PSA was available more than 1 month after the operation. CONCLUSIONS: Radical prostatectomy can be routinely performed by laparoscopy by an experienced team. Short-term oncological data were identical to the results of conventional retropubic surgery, and morbidity was low. The laparoscopic approach could constitute in the future a technical improvement over radical prostatectomy if long-term oncological results are confirmed and if improvement of intraoperative vision improves the functional results of this operation.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

The results of radical prostatectomy at a community hospital during the prostate specific antigen era.

BACKGROUND: The use of radical prostatectomy in the treatment of prostate cancer has increased with the advent of prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening. Few series have examined the relapse rates after prostatectomy relative to pre-treatment prognostic factors, such as preoperative PSA and Gleason scores. The characteristics and outcome of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and treated with radical prostatectomy at community hospitals in the prostate specific antigen era have not been described in detail. METHODS: The tumor registry records were obtained for all patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and treated with radical prostatectomy at Washington Hospital, Fremont, CA, from 1990 through 1993. The clinical and pathologic characteristics, including the original pathology report, for the 100 patients were reviewed by a single physician. Relapse was defined by the persistence or appearance of a PSA value greater than 0.2 ng/mL (Hybritech, Inc., San Diego, CA) following surgery or by clinical evidence of recurrent disease. Crude and actuarial probabilities of relapse were analyzed relative to pre-treatment PSA values, Gleason score, pathologic stage, and surgical margin status. The median follow-up time was 2.5 years. RESULTS: The pT-classification distribution of the 100 cases was as follows: T1, 4%; T2A, 14%; T2B, 11%; T2C, 49%; T3A, 8%; T3B, 2%; T3C, 6%; and N+, 6%. Pretreatment PSA values were less than or equal to 4 ng/mL for 10 patients, greater than 4 to 10 ng/mL for 38 patients, greater than 10 to 20 ng/mL for 27 patients, and greater than 20 ng/mL for 13 patients. The value was unknown for 12 patients. The Gleason score was less than or equal to 5 for 40%, 6 for 17%, 7 for 31%, and 8 to 10 for 12%. Positive surgical margins were noted in 30% of the patients. The actuarial probability of overall survival and freedom from relapse for the entire group of patients at 3 years was 95% and 73%, respectively. Pre-treatment PSA values greater than 20 ng/mL, Gleason score greater than or equal to 7, and pT3 classification were significant predictors of relapse in univariate analysis. Preoperative PSA greater than 20 ng/mL and Gleason score were significant prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. Pathologic margin status was not a significant predictor of relapse in this experience. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term relapse rates are high among those patients with preoperative PSA values greater then 20 ng/mL or Gleason scores greater than or equal to 7. Overall results of radical prostatectomy at this community hospital were similar to those reported at referral centers.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

Predictors of survival for prostate carcinoma patients treated with salvage radical prostatectomy after radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Salvage radical prostatectomy is a treatment option for patients with recurrent cancer following radiation therapy. This study was conducted to identify predictors of survival for patients treated with salvage radical prostatectomy. METHODS: The authors studied 86 prostate carcinoma patients who underwent salvage radical prostatectomy for locally persistent or recurrent prostate carcinoma at Mayo Clinic between 1967 and 1996. The mean interval from radiation therapy to biopsy-proven recurrence was 3.7 years (range, 6 months to 17 years). Patient age at surgery ranged from 51 to 78 years (median, 66 years). The mean follow-up after surgery was 5.8 years (range, 1.0-15.2 years). Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify clinical and pathologic factors associated with distant metastasis free survival and cancer specific survival. RESULTS: Actuarial distant metastasis free survival, cancer specific survival, and overall survival were 83%, 91%, and 85% at 5 years and 69%, 64%, and 54% at 10 years, respectively. In multivariate analysis, radical prostatectomy Gleason score and DNA ploidy were independent predictors of distant metastasis free survival and cancer specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: Postirradiation Gleason score and DNA ploidy were highly predictive of the clinical outcomes of patients treated by salvage radical prostatectomy after radiation therapy.

Aged↗
PubMed1987

The role of radical prostatectomy in the management of prostatic cancer.

The indications for radical prostatectomy must reflect the following: an understanding of the natural history of the disease, the projected life span of the patient, the stage of the disease, and the relative morbidity and efficacy of alternative therapeutic regimens. The integration of clinical stage, histologic grade, and pelvic lymph node evaluation has improved the selection of the ideal candidate for radical prostatectomy. In men with localized disease, there is no evidence that any treatment other than radical prostatectomy produces better control of the primary lesion and of distant metastases than does total surgical excision of the prostate. Recently the morbidity of radical prostatectomy has been reduced by improvements in surgical technique. Intraoperative identification and preservation of the branches of the pelvic plexus that innervate the corpora cavernosa has resulted in long-term postoperative potency rates of 70% without compromising complete excision of the tumor. Thus it appears possible today to preserve sexual function in a majority of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy without compromising the cancer operation, an observation that may encourage more physicians to take greater interest in diagnosing prostatic cancer in young men at a stage when it is still curable.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1994

Adjuvant irradiation after prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate with positive surgical margins.

BACKGROUND: Patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with prostatectomy who have tumor at the margins of the surgical specimen or tumor involvement of the seminal vesicles have a high risk of local recurrence and metastatic disease. It is unclear whether postoperative irradiation improves their outcome. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of patients treated with prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate who had surgical margins or seminal vesicles involved by tumor. Thirty-four patients received adjuvant postoperative irradiation (Group 1), and 43 patients did not receive irradiation (Group 2). RESULTS: The tumor control rates in the prostatic bed for patients who had radical prostatectomy were 100% and 84% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.017). Actuarial 10-year disease-free survival from the date of prostatectomy was 46% and 55% for Groups 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant irradiation after prostatectomy in patients with positive surgical margins or seminal vesical invasion increases prostatic bed local tumor control but does not affect survival. Postoperative irradiation is associated with acceptable morbidity.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2000

Surgical and postoperative factors affecting length of hospital stay after radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Radical prostatectomy continues to comprise the mainstay of therapy for localized prostate carcinoma. However, caring for radical prostatectomy patients accounts for approximately half of the $1.7 billion annual cost of prostate carcinoma treatment. Length of stay (LOS) after surgery appears to be one of the main components of this cost. The first step in reducing cost is to identify those variables associated with LOS. Radical prostatectomy can be performed using two very different surgical techniques and with each technique different costs are incurred. The objective of the current study was to identify factors associated with LOS as a function of surgical approach. To reduce potential biases due to patient requests for longer hospitalization or physician preferences in that regard, secondary objectives were to identify factors associated with time to fluid intake (TTF) and time to consume solid foods (TTS). METHODS: An institutional-based, retrospective chart review of 313 men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma who underwent either a perineal (RPP) or retropubic (RRP) prostatectomy at a single university center from March 1988 to October 1996 was undertaken. Information regarding LOS was available for 311 patients. Linear regression models were used to assess the association between covariables and LOS. Poisson regression models for count data were used to assess associations between covariables and the secondary endpoints of TTF and TTS. Covariables included: preoperative (age, race, prostate specific antigen, Gleason score, clinical stage, lymph node resection, comorbidity, and admission time), intraoperative (surgical approach, surgeon, operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion requirement, anesthetic approach, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score), and postoperative (pain management complications and transfusions) parameters. RESULTS: The median LOS was 4 days (range, 1-19 days) for RPP and 5 days (range, 3-16 days) for RRP approaches. The final model included six main effects and three interaction terms. Overall, LOS decreased over time with LOS decreasing at a faster rate in patients who underwent RPP. In general, patients who underwent RRP had an increased LOS compared with patients who underwent RPP. Complications from surgery and age increased the LOS for all patients; however, the increase was greater in patients who underwent RPP. In addition, the use of intraoperative epidural anesthesia and the increased use of postoperative narcotics were associated with increased LOS for patients undergoing both surgical approaches. TTF and TTS were significantly longer for patients who underwent the retropubic approach compared with those patients who underwent the perineal approach. After adjustment for surgical approach no other covariables were found to be associated with TTF. After adjustment for surgical approach, the occurrence of complications was found to be associated with TTS, indicating that patients who experienced complications took longer before they could tolerate solid foods. CONCLUSIONS: In view of the importance of clinical care pathways in reducing medical expenditures from radical prostatectomy, the results of the current study may contribute to the further refining of these pathways by highlighting the differences and similarities among the variables affecting LOS as a function of surgical approach.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Laser prostatectomy for benign prostatic obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction is a common problem for older men. The gold standard treatment, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), significantly improves urinary symptoms and urinary flow. However, TURP has up to a 20% morbidity. Currently, there are a number of minimally invasive procedures that may be safe, effective alternatives to TURP. One promising surgical technique is laser prostatectomy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of laser prostatectomy techniques for treating men with symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomized controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Collaboration Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies of retrieved articles and reviews, and contacting expert relevant trialists and laser manufacturers. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized controlled trials evaluating laser prostatectomy treatment for men with symptomatic BPH. Trials were eligible if they (1) were randomized comparisons of a laser technique with TURP, (2) included at least 10 men with BPO in each treatment arm, (3) provided at least 6-months follow-up, and (4) included clinical outcomes such as urologic symptom scales or urodynamic measurements. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction and assessment of methodologic quality was performed independently by two reviewers. Information on study design, subject and treatment characteristics, adverse events, urinary symptoms, and urinary flow were extracted using a standard form. MAIN RESULTS: 20 studies involving 1898 subjects were evaluated, including studies 4 with multiple comparisons. We found 8 comparisons of TURP with contact lasers, 8 with non-contact lasers, 4 with hybrid techniques, and one with interstitial laser coagulation (ILC). Two studies compared transurethral electrovaporization (TUVP) with contact lasers, one study compared interstitial laser coagulation with transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT), and one study compared holmium contact lasers (HoLRP) with open prostatectomy. Among the studies comparing laser prostatectomy with TURP, follow-up duration ranged from 6 to 36 months. Mean age (67.2 yrs), mean baseline symptom score (20.2), and mean baseline peak urinary flow (9.2 ml/s) did not differ by treatment group. The pooled percentage improvements for mean urinary symptoms ranged from 59% to 68% with lasers and 63% to 77% with TURP. The improvements for mean peak urinary flow ranged from 56% to 119% with lasers and 96% to 127% with TURP. Overall, laser subjects were less likely to receive transfusions or develop strictures and their hospitalizations were shorter. Non-contact laser subjects were more likely to have dysuria, urinary tract infection, and retention. Re-operation occurred more often following laser procedures. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Laser techniques are a useful alternative to TURP for treating BPO. Small sample sizes and differences in study design limit any definitive conclusions regarding the preferred type of laser technique. Data were insufficient to compare laser techniques with other minimally invasive procedures.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens over the past 10 years: is there evidence for systematic upgrading?

BACKGROUND: With the advent of the prostate specific antigen (PSA) assay, an increased detection rate of prostate carcinoma has ensued. This has been associated with a downward stage migration. In contrast, grade has shifted heavily toward moderate differentiation. The authors sought to test the hypothesis that such changes in grade in part may be because of trends among pathologists to upgrade similar specimens over time. METHODS: Two expert genitourinary pathologists regraded 23 prostate biopsies and 15 radical prostatectomy specimens during a 3-year period (1989-1991). Each pathologist then regraded 32 prostate biopsies and 15 radical prostatectomies from 1998 to 2000. For both time periods, each pathologist regraded only specimens that they personally had graded initially. All specimens were scored using the Gleason system, the predominant system used in describing prostate carcinoma grade. In evaluating original and regraded scores, the authors classified score changes between less than or equal to 6 and greater than or equal to 7 or between 7 and greater than or equal to 8 as significant because such changes have a high probability of altering clinical management. The results were analyzed using the two-tailed Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Of 23 prostate biopsies from 1989 to 1991, 10 of 23 (44%) had a clinically significant Gleason score change when regraded, whereas 2 of 15 (13%) radical prostatectomy specimens from the same period had a clinically significant Gleason score change. A significant change in the distribution of biopsy Gleason scores on regrading was observed (P < 0.04). In comparison, when the prostate biopsies from 1998-2000 were regraded, 10 of 32 (31%) had a clinically significant grade change. Radical prostatectomy specimens from the same period revealed 3 of 15 (20%) with a clinically significant grade change. After regrading the biopsies from 1989-1991, 8 of 23 (35%) of were upgraded, whereas 2 of 23 (9%) were downgraded. In comparison, of the biopsies with significant changes from 1998 to 2000, 3 of 32 (9%) were upgraded, whereas 7 of 32 (22%) were downgraded. Of the radical prostatectomy specimens with significant change, only 2 of 15 from each period were upgraded. Significant upgrading (P < 0.005) occurred only in the biopsy specimens from 1989 to 1991. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' data suggest that rates of upgrading and downgrading of biopsy specimens differ between the 1989-1991 cases and the 1998-2000 cases, with the 1989-1991 samples exhibiting a significant change toward higher grades. Although not excluding the possibility of a change in the biology of prostate carcinoma over time, these findings suggest that the apparent trend toward higher biopsy grades in part may be because of how pathologists interpret these specimens today as compared with 10 years ago. Therefore, outcome studies including a biopsy Gleason score from older specimens as a risk variable have a significant chance of being vulnerable to this phenomenon. Based on the authors' data, all such specimens should undergo rereview.

Biopsy, Needle↗
PubMed2002

Prostate specific antigen progression after radical prostatectomy in African-American men versus white men.

BACKGROUND: It is well established that African-American men (AAM) have a worse mortality from prostate carcinoma (PC) than White men (WM). Outcome data for men treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized PC demonstrate more advanced tumors and higher biochemical recurrence rates among AAM compared with WM. The objective of the current study was to characterize the pattern of prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression by race in patients experiencing disease recurrence after undergoing radical prostatectomy. Racial differences in the pattern of rising PSA would warrant different intervention strategies for reducing the disproportionality in survival outcomes between the two racial groups. METHODS: Between 1991-1996, 1080 consecutive men underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically localized PC at Wayne State University-affiliated Harper Hospital. Two hundred forty-one patients developed a biochemical recurrence on or before January, 1, 1999. The median follow-up was 39 months. Longitudinal PSA profiles of 77 men who met the study inclusion criteria were analyzed. Average relative velocities of PSA were compared between AAM and WM. Linear mixed effects regression was used to test the hypothesis that, after adjusting for age, preoperative PSA, stage and grade of disease, PSA levels increase at a faster rate in AAM compared with WM. RESULTS: The mean average relative velocity for AAM and WM experiencing a disease recurrence was 0.25 ng/mL and 0.11 ng/mL per month, respectively (P = 0.21). The relative rate of PSA increase in patients who developed a disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy was 18.9% per month for AAM and 16.3% per month for WM (P = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: AAM and WM appear to have similar rates of PSA progression after undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Quantitative alterations in nuclear structure predict prostate carcinoma distant metastasis and death in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Microscopic histologic grade has been the best predictor of prostate carcinoma (PCa) progression in men after surgical therapy. The ability to predict accurately, at the time of surgery, which patients are likely to develop metastatic PCa would enable optimization of disease management with adjuvant therapy. The authors assessed the ability of pathologic, nuclear morphometric, and chromatin parameters to predict metastatic PCa progression and/or death in 227 men with biochemical recurrence and long-term follow-up after undergoing radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Multivariate logistic regression (LR) was used to calculate quantitative nuclear grade (QNG) solutions using the variances of 60 nuclear morphometric descriptors (NMDs) of nuclear size, shape, DNA content, and chromatin organization that predicted distant metastasis and/or PCa-specific death. An LR model also was generated to predict this outcome using a combination of pathologic variables and the best QNG solution. Cox proportional hazards models were generated, and Kaplan-Meier plots were used to display three risk groups based on pathology, QNG, and a combination of these variables. RESULTS: A multivariate LR model using pathology retained lymph node (LN) status, seminal vesicle status, and prostatectomy Gleason score, yielding an area under the curve-receiver operator characteristic (AUC-ROC) of 75% with an accuracy of 59% at 90% sensitivity. The best QNG solution used the variance of 25 NMDs, yielding an AUC-ROC of 84% and an accuracy of 70% at 90% sensitivity. The combined pathology-QNG model retained LN status, prostatectomy Gleason score, and QNG, yielding an AUC-ROC of 86% with an accuracy of 76% at 90% sensitivity. The Cox proportional hazards models produced the following significant univariate and multivariate hazard ratios: QNG, 3.5 and 2.9, respectively; LN, 2.7 and 1.8, respectively; and prostatectomy Gleason score, 2.8 and 2.1, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations in the structure of tumor nuclei measured by computer-assisted image analysis were strong predictors of PCa progression and death in men with long-term follow-up who had biochemical recurrence after undergoing radical prostatectomy. QNG solutions can serve as a new supplemental biomarker for accurate prediction of PCa progression at the time of surgery.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2007

Retropubic versus perineal radical prostatectomy in early prostate cancer: eight-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men and the second leading cause of cancer death. A randomized study was performed on patients with localized prostate cancer and treated with radical prostatectomy using the perineal or the retropubic approach comparing oncological outcomes, cancer control, and functional results. STUDY DESIGN: Between 1997 and 2004, in a randomized study 200 patients underwent a radical prostatectomy performed by retropubic (100 patients) or perineal (100 patients) approach. RESULTS: Differences between hospital stay, duration of catheter drainage, intraoperative blood loss, and transfusion requirements were statistically significant in favor of perineal prostatectomy. Differences between positive surgical margins and urinary continence in the two groups were not statistically significant at 6 and 24 months. Differences between erectile function at 24 months were statistically significant in favor of retropubic prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Radical perineal prostatectomy is an excellent alternative approach for radical surgery in the treatment of early prostate cancer.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗