Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PHIMOSIS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources

Treating phimosis.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Attitude to Health↗

Phimosis hook.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Circumcision, Male↗

[Results of terminal salpingostomy and fimbrioplasty in distal occlusion and tubal phimosis].

Terminal salpingostomy and fimbrioplastics were performed in 108 patients by conventional surgical technique: 78 had bilateral occlusion of the abdominal orifice of the uterine tube with hydrosalpinx, 21 unilateral distal occlusion coupled with stenosis and perisalpingitis on the other side, and 9 bilateral stenosis and perisalpingitis. In all patients other causes of sterility were excluded. The duration of their sterility lasted 2-15 years, while their age ranged from 21 to 40 years. In 96 out 108 patients laparoscopy was applied immediately before operation. Out of 108 surgically treated patients, 22 conceived and gave birth to a child (20%), 2 had abortion (0.92%), and 7 conceived outside the uterus (3.7%). In 72 patients who did not conceive six months after operation, control hysterosalpingography was applied; it showed that 58 patients had one or both tubes unobstructed (80.5%), while bilateral reocclusion was found in 14 patients (19.4%). Hydrotubation was performed by a mixture of antibiotics and hydrocortisone 3-5 days following operation.

Adult↗

Histopathological evaluation of the preputium in preschool and primary school boys.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dermatopathology of the preputium in preschool and primary school children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 32 boys subjected to circumcision procedure for religious belief consecutively between June 2003 and September 2003 in our clinic. The removed foreskin is examined by the same pathologist in all cases and the presence of any dermatopathology was noted. RESULTS: The mean age of the children was 6+/-2 (4-12) years. Three (9.3%) boys had complete phimosis while 2 (6.2%) had partial phimosis. Among 27 (84.3%) cases without phimosis, the histopathological examination of the preputium revealed focal lichenoid cellular infiltrate with epidermal atrophy in 1 (3.1%) patient. This pattern was considered as early lichen sclerosus et atrophicus (LSA). Minor changes were reported in 1 (3.1%) boy namely minimal inflammation and oedema while 1 (3.1%) patient had more marked oedema and acute inflammatory cell infiltration (diagnosed as balanoposthitis). Three (9.3%) preputium specimens revealed evidence of chronic inflammation. Finally 2 (6.2%) boys showed increased melanin pigmentation in basal segment of the foreskin. In 5 (15.6%) patients with phimosis 1 (20%) (complete phimosis) had chronic inflammation and oedema while the other (20%) (partial phimosis) had chronic inflammatory infiltrate only. The rest of the boys with phimosis had normal preputial pathology. As a total, 22 (68.8%) of the 32 cases had totally normal preputial foreskin. CONCLUSION: The presence of foreskin in preschool and primary school children might rarely be associated with important inflammatory dermatoses like LSA even in the absence of phimosis.

Child↗

Preputial bacterial colonisation in preschool and primary school children.

OBJECTIVES: Preputial bacterial colonisation was investigated in preschool and primary school children with and without phimosis before the circumcision procedure. METHOD: The study group consisted of 32 boys admitted to our clinic consecutively between June 2003 and September 2003 for circumcision. The indication for surgery was religious belief in all patients. Immediately before the procedure, a swab was swept circumferentially once around the surface of the glans starting just proximal to the urethral meatus. In case of phimosis the same procedure was performed after complete retraction of the foreskin avoiding external contamination. The cultures were repeated in all patients after cleansing the glans and nearby preputium with polyvidon-iodine solution. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients' was 6 (4-12) years. All 5 (100%) patients with phimosis had clinically significant (> or =100,000 cfu/ml) uropathogenic bacterial colonisation. In 27 (84.3%) patients without phimosis culture reports revealed the absence of growth in 8 (29.6%) patients while 3 (11.1%) had Diphteroids and 1 (3.7%) had alpha-haemolytic Streptococci isolated from their preputial swabs which were accepted as harmless skin commensals. The rest of the boys (55.5%) had uropathogenic species in their preputium and all except 2 (7.4%) cases had counts exceeding 100,000 cfu/ml. The overall rates for individual species including any count were found as E. coli 3.1%, Klebsiella 18.8%, coagulase-negative Staphylococci12.5% and Enterococcus 43.8%. Cleansing of perimeatal and periurethral region with 10% polyvidon-iodine solution markedly decreased the bacterial count in 80% of the patients with phimosis. Including eight patients with no growth before cleansing 88.9% of the patients in the non-phimosis group were free of preputial bacteria after cleansing with iodine solution. CONCLUSION: Significant preputial colonisation with uropathogens might still be present in preschool and primary school children.

Bacteria↗

Preputial variability and preferential association of long phimotic foreskins with penile cancer: an anatomic comparative study of types of foreskin in a general population and cancer patients.

Difficulty in foreskin retraction and phimosis are risk factors for penile carcinoma that may be related to the anatomically variable length of the foreskin. This observation has stimulated us to postulate the hypothesis that foreskin length is related to penile cancer. To compare the foreskin in the general population and patients with penile cancer, an anatomic classification of foreskin was designed. We examined the foreskin of 215 uncircumcised males without cancer (age range 15-93 years) and the foreskin of 23 patients with cancer (age range 31-90 years). Foreskin types were classified as long (with the preputial orifice located beyond glans meatus and entirely covering the glans), medium (with the preputial orifice located between meatus and glans corona), and short (with the preputial orifice located between corona and coronal sulcus). Phimosis was defined as a nonretractable prepuce of the long type. We found that 77% of noncancer population cases had long foreskin and that only 7% of these cases were phimotic. Cancer patients showed long foreskin in 78% of the cases, and phimosis was significantly frequent in this group (52%) as compared with the other (p <0.001). Coexistence of a long foreskin and phimosis may explain the high incidence of penile cancer in some geographic regions. To better document these findings, a comparison of foreskin types in countries with high and low incidence of penile cancer will be interesting. However, because phimosis appears to be a major factor, the presence of long foreskin may be a necessary but not a sufficient condition for cancer development. For these reasons we support preventive circumcision in patients with long and phimotic foreskins living in high-risk areas. Cancers not related to long foreskins and phimosis may be causally different.

Adult↗

Penile cancer: importance of circumcision, human papillomavirus and smoking in in situ and invasive disease.

Few population-based case-control studies have assessed etiologic factors for penile cancer. Past infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is a known risk factor for penile cancer; however, few previous studies have related the HPV DNA status of the tumor to potential demographic and behavioral risk factors for the disease or evaluated whether in situ and invasive penile cancer share risk factors. Little information is available on the role and timing of circumcision in the etiology of penile cancer. We conducted a population-based case-control study in western Washington state that included 137 men diagnosed with in situ (n = 75) or invasive (n = 62) penile cancer between January 1, 1979, and December 31, 1998, and 671 control men identified through random digit dialing. Cases and controls were interviewed in person and provided peripheral blood samples. Case and control blood samples were tested for antibodies to HPV16 and HSV-2, and tumor specimens from cases were tested for HPV DNA. Men not circumcised during childhood were at increased risk of invasive (OR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.1) but not in situ (OR = 1.1, 95% CI 0.6-1.8) penile cancer. Approximately 35% of men with penile cancer who had not been circumcised in childhood reported a history of phimosis compared to 7.6% of controls (OR = 7.4, 95% CI 3.7-15.0). Penile conditions such as tear, rash and injury were associated with increased risk of disease. Among men not circumcised in childhood, phimosis was strongly associated with development of invasive penile cancer (OR = 11.4, 95% CI 5.0-25.9). When we restricted our analysis to men who did not have phimosis, the risk of invasive penile cancer associated with not having been circumcised in childhood was not elevated (OR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.1-2.5). Cigarette smoking was associated with a 4.5-fold risk (95% CI 2.0-10.1) of invasive penile cancer. HPV DNA was detected in 79.8% of tumor specimens, and 69.1% of tumors were HPV16-positive. The proportion of HPV DNA-positive tumors did not vary by any risk factors evaluated. Many risk factors were common for both in situ and invasive disease. However, 3 factors that did not increase the risk for in situ cancer proved significant risk factors for invasive penile cancer: lack of circumcision during childhood, phimosis and cigarette smoking. The high percentage of HPV DNA-positive tumors in our study is consistent with a strong association between HPV infection and the development of penile cancer regardless of circumcision status. Circumcision in early childhood may help prevent penile cancer by eliminating phimosis, a significant risk factor for the disease.

Adolescent↗

Incidence of preputial lichen sclerosus in adults: histologic study of circumcision specimens.

BACKGROUND: Narrowing of the prepuce in men is poorly documented, and the causes are often unknown, except in the case of clinical infections or skin diseases such as lichen sclerosus (LS). OBJECTIVE: We conducted a histologic study of circumcision specimens with phimosis or paraphimosis. METHODS: This prospective study included 43 men with contraction referred for circumcision. RESULTS: LS was present in 32% of cases, but only 12% of these cases of LS had not been diagnosed before circumcision. In 31% of cases the histologic findings were normal. Subacute nonspecific inflammatory changes were diagnosed in 37% of all cases, and secondary narrowing of the prepuce in 62% of cases. It is probable that this histologic modification of the preputial mucosa is involved in narrowing of the prepuce. CONCLUSION: Phimosis in young adults is usually not associated with LS (only 14%). In contrast, most older patients had secondary phimosis caused by progressive LS (40%) or subacute nonspecific inflammatory changes (40%). Although all cases of phimosis in men should be treated by complete circumcision to prevent penile cancer, paraphimosis associated with preputial dyspareunia, with the exception of cases associated with LS, can be treated by corrective surgery.

Adult↗

Risk factors for penile cancer: results of a population-based case-control study in Los Angeles County (United States).

UNLABELLED: The etiology of penile cancer is poorly understood, with neonatal circumcision being one of the few recognized nondemographic risk factors. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze interview data from 100 matched case-control pairs; cases of carcinoma in situ (CIS) and invasive carcinoma of the penis were analyzed separately as well as together. Phimosis was strongly associated with invasive carcinoma (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 16; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5-57) but not CIS (OR = 1.7; 95% CI = 0.32-7.8), and these associations persisted when the analyses were restricted to uncircumcised subjects. Neonatal circumcision was inversely associated with invasive carcinoma (OR = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.13-1.1) but not CIS, and the observed association with invasive carcinoma was weakened appreciably when the analysis was restricted to subjects with no history of phimosis (OR = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.29-2.6). Other factors positively associated with invasive carcinoma or CIS or both were injury to the penis, cigarette smoking, physical inactivity and, to a lesser extent, genital warts and other infections or inflammation of the penis. CONCLUSIONS: Although many effects were imprecisely estimated in this study, the protective effect of circumcision on invasive penile cancer appears to be mediated in large part by phimosis; furthermore, the effects of certain factors such as phimosis and circumcision appear to differ for CIS and invasive carcinoma.

Adult↗

Psychological trauma of circumcision in the phallic period could be avoided by using topical steroids.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to assess the efficacy of topical steroids in the treatment of phimosis and evaluate patients using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-III-Revised (DSM-III-R) test with the aim of eliminating castration anxiety of circumcision in the phallic period. METHODS: One hundred and forty-nine children with phimosis who required circumcision were included the study. The average age of the children was 4.47 years. All children underwent the DSM-III-R test and their parents were questioned. Patients were separated randomly into three groups. Group I comprised 51 children who would undergo circumcision; group II comprised 50 children who would be treated with a topical corticosteroid (0.05% bethamethasone cream) twice daily for 1 month; and group III comprised 48 children who would be treated with a topical placebo cream. On the 5th day of treatment, parents were told to retract the prepuce and were given hygiene routine instructions. Patients were seen immediately after treatment and again 2 months later. RESULTS: In group II, 16 of the 50 children had non-retractable prepuce. Forty-two cases of phimosis were corrected after treatment. Eight patients received further monthly treatment and five benefited from the second course of treatment. In group III, 17 of the 48 patients had non-retractable prepuce and four had satisfactory results. Forty-four patients received placebo treatment for another month and eventually, 40 children underwent circumcision in this group. DSM-III-R test results showed a significant shift to anxiety in the circumcision group. The were no significant differences in the other groups. CONCLUSION: Topical steroids for the treatment of phimosis is a highly effective treatment alternative to surgery. It avoids or delays circumcision and can be practised during the phallic period to decrease castration anxiety. The treatment is suitable for patients from any religious or cultural background.

Administration, Topical↗