Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Motion Perception”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources
PubMed1989

Two motion perception mechanisms revealed through distance-driven reversal of apparent motion.

We demonstrate two kinds of visual stimuli that exhibit motion in one direction when viewed from near and in the opposite direction from afar. These striking reversals occur because each kind of stimulus is constructed to simultaneously activate two different mechanisms: a short-range mechanism that computes motion from space-time correspondences in stimulus luminance and a long-range mechanism in which motion computations are performed, instead, on stimulus contrast that has been full-wave rectified (e.g., on the absolute value of contrast).

Journal Article↗
PubMed2001

When sound affects vision: effects of auditory grouping on visual motion perception.

Two identical visual targets moving across each other can be perceived either to bounce off or to stream through each other. A brief sound at the moment the targets coincide biases perception toward bouncing. We found that this bounce-inducing effect was attenuated when other identical sounds (auditory flankers) were presented 300 ms before and after the simultaneous sound. The attenuation occurred only when the simultaneous sound and auditory flankers had similar acoustic characteristics and the simultaneous sound was not salient. These results suggest that there is an aspect of auditory-grouping (saliency-assigning) processes that is context-sensitive and can be utilized by the visual system for solving ambiguity. Furthermore, control experiments revealed that such auditory context did not affect the perceptual qualities of the simultaneous sound. Because the attenuation effect is not manifest in the perception of acoustic characteristics of individual sound elements, we conclude that it is a genuine cross-modal effect.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2006

Distinct mechanisms of form-from-motion perception in human extrastriate cortex.

The exquisite sensitivity of the human visual system to form-from-motion (FfM) cues is well documented. However, identifying the neural correlates of this sensitivity has proven difficult, particularly determining the respective contributions of different motion areas in extrastriate visual cortex. Here we measured visual FfM perception and more elementary visual motion (VM) perception in a group of 32 patients suffering from acute posterior brain damage, and performed MRI-based lesion analysis. Our results suggest that severe FfM perception deficits without an associated deficit of VM perception are due to damage to ventral occipito-temporal cortex (VOT), whereas associated deficits of FfM and VM perception are due to damage either in proximity to area MT+/V5 or an area including lateral occipital complex (LOC) and VOT. These data suggest the existence of at least three functionally and anatomically distinct regions in human visual cortex that process FfM signals.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Mechanisms of human motion perception revealed by a new cyclopean illusion.

A new cyclopean illusion of motion may bear on neural mechanisms of direction selectivity. Stationary flickering patterns were presented to each eye, and the resulting fused pattern was perceived to be moving. To determine direction of motion, the visual system seems to integrate image components differing by 90 degrees in spatial and temporal phase. On the other hand, image speed seems to be derived from displacement of features over time. A model of neural direction selectivity is discussed in light of these results.

Fourier Analysis↗
PubMed2003

Motion perception in autism: a "complex" issue.

We present the first assessment of motion sensitivity for persons with autism and normal intelligence using motion patterns that require neural processing mechanisms of varying complexity. Compared to matched controls, our results demonstrate that the motion sensitivity of observers with autism is similar to that of nonautistic observers for different types of first-order (luminance-defined) motion stimuli, but significantly decreased for the same types of second-order (texture-defined) stimuli. The latter class of motion stimuli has been demonstrated to require additional neural computation to be processed adequately. This finding may reflect less efficient integrative functioning of the neural mechanisms that mediate visuoperceptual processing in autism. The contribution of this finding with regards to abnormal perceptual integration in autism, its effect on cognitive operations, and possible behavioral implications are discussed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Using metamers to explore motion perception.

We examined conditions under which two quite different types of random-dot cinematograms were perceptually matched. In one stimulus type, directions of motion were defined by a uniform distribution; in the other, directions were drawn from a discrete set of just a few, widely separated directions. Cinematograms whose range of uniformly distributed directions lay between 180 and 270 deg could be matched by cinematograms containing just 6-10 discrete directions. The number of discrete directions required for a match was a nonmonotonic function of the range of directions present in the other cinematogram. The results are consistent with a line-element model in which the outputs of 12 direction-selective mechanisms, each with a half-amplitude half-bandwidth of 30 deg, are combined nonlinearly to produce the percept of motion.

Humans↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Self-motion perception: assessment by computer-generated animations.

The goal of this research is more precise description of adaptation to sensory rearrangements, including microgravity, by development of improved procedures for assessing spatial orientation perception. Thirty-six subjects reported perceived self-motion following exposure to complex inertial-visual motion. Twelve subjects were assigned to each of 3 perceptual reporting procedures: (a) animation movie selection, (b) written report selection and (c) verbal report generation. The question addressed was: do reports produced by these procedures differ with respect to complexity and reliability? Following repeated (within-day and across-day) exposures to 4 different "motion profiles," subjects either (a) selected movies presented on a laptop computer, or (b) selected written descriptions from a booklet, or (c) generated self-motion verbal descriptions that corresponded most closely with their motion experience. One "complexity" and 2 reliability "scores" were calculated. Contrary to expectations, reliability and complexity scores were essentially equivalent for the animation movie selection and written report selection procedures. Verbal report generation subjects exhibited less complexity than did subjects in the other conditions and their reports were often ambiguous. The results suggest that, when selecting from carefully written descriptions and following appropriate training, people may be better able to describe their self-motion experience with words than is usually believed.

Aerospace Medicine↗
PubMed2004

Components of motion perception revealed: two different after-effects from a single moving object.

If motion that one has been looking at for some time suddenly stops, or if one shifts one's gaze to a static object, one will see motion in the opposite direction: the motion after-effect. If two transparent surfaces move with different speeds in different directions, then the direction of the motion after-effect will depend on the test pattern. For such transparent surfaces both the local motion and the global percept have two components. When looking at a normal moving object, there is only one perceived global motion. However, we know that locally there can be considerable ambiguity (the aperture problem). Does one adapt to all the local components, including those that one does not perceive, or only to the perceived global motion? We designed a stimulus that is perceived to be a fast rotating object, but also has a slow local radial component of motion. By selecting an appropriate test pattern we could either get a radial or a rotating motion after-effect. Thus we show that adaptation to motion must (also) occur at a stage at which local motions have not yet been integrated to give a unified percept.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed1992

Attention-based motion perception.

Two "attentive" tracking tasks reveal the existence of an attention-based motion process. In the first task, oppositely rotating luminance and color gratings were superimposed. Because of masking from the color grating, the bars of the luminance grating were not visible; nevertheless, their motion was visible and it determined the perceived direction of the stimulus rotation. On the other hand, the bars of the color grating were visible but they could only be seen to move (in the opposite direction to the overall stimulus rotation) when they were tracked with attention. In a second task, the perceived velocity of a color grating, typically slow at equiluminance, speeded up when individual bars were attentively tracked. These findings demonstrate two independent motion processes: one that is "low-level" or automatic in that it signals motion even in the absence of attention to the stimulus, and one that is mediated by attention to visible features and provides accurate velocity judgments independently of the features being tracked.

Attention↗
PubMed2003

Inhibitory interhemispheric visuovisual interaction in motion perception.

Findings of an earlier functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study that coherent motion stimulation of the right or left visual hemifield exhibited negative signal changes (deactivations) in the primary visual cortex and the lateral geniculate nucleus contralateral to the stimulated hemisphere were evaluated to determine the functional significance of this contralateral inhibition of the visual system. Fourteen subjects participated in a psychophysical study on the perception of single object motion (0.4 degrees /s) in one visual hemifield with or without concurrent coherent motion stimulation of the contralateral hemifield. Mean detection times for horizontal object motion (0.5 +/- 0.19 vs. 0.61 +/- 0.22 s) and vertical object motion (0.53 +/- 0.19 vs. 0.72 +/- 0.34 s) were significantly prolonged during concurrent motion pattern stimulation in the contralateral hemifield. These data support the interpretation that the deactivation of neuronal activity in the visual system found by fMRI is associated with a functional decrement in the sensitivity needed to perceive motion and may reflect transcallosal attentional shifts between the two hemispheres.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

The inversion effect in biological motion perception: evidence for a "life detector"?

If biological-motion point-light displays are presented upside down, adequate perception is strongly impaired. Reminiscent of the inversion effect in face recognition, it has been suggested that the inversion effect in biological motion is due to impaired configural processing in a highly trained expert system. Here, we present data that are incompatible with this view. We show that observers can readily retrieve information about direction from scrambled point-light displays of humans and animals. Even though all configural information is entirely disrupted, perception of these displays is still subject to a significant inversion effect. Inverting only parts of the display reveals that the information about direction, as well as the associated inversion effect, is entirely carried by the local motion of the feet. We interpret our findings in terms of a visual filter that is tuned to the characteristic motion of the limbs of an animal in locomotion and hypothesize that this mechanism serves as a general detection system for the presence of articulated terrestrial animals.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Spatiotemporal properties of motion perception for random-check contrast modulations.

To clarify the mechanism of detecting the motion of contrast modulations, the spatiotemporal properties of direction discrimination for contrast motion were examined. The stimulus was a microbalanced random stimulus [Chubb and Sperling (1988) Journal of the Optical Society of America A 5, 1986-2007], termed random-window kinematogram (RWK), a shifting random checkerboard pattern in which each check was either a patch of random dots (uncorrelated between frames) or a patch of uniform gray having the mean luminance of the random dots. The effect of exposure duration (ED) on RWK discrimination could be described as stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) dependency when EDs of the first and second frames were the same, but the performance was better than predicted from SOA when the first ED was short while the second was long. RWK could be seen at longer inter-stimulus intervals than random-dot kinematogram (RDK) having similar stimulus parameters (e.g. check size, effective contrast). Incoherent motion (e.g. reversed phi) could be seen for RWK. Maximum displacement limit (Dmax) for RWK was comparable to that of RDK, but it increased in proportion to check size, while Dmax for RDK did not. These results suggest that the contrast motion mechanism extracts motion locally, and involves a correlation-type motion extraction stage similar to the luminance motion mechanism. In addition, the spatial ranges of the contrast motion detectors are comparable to those of the luminance motion detectors, but their temporal range is larger. The contrast motion mechanism is more scale-invariant than the luminance motion mechanism.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1990

Transparency and coherence in human motion perception.

When confronted with moving images, the visual system often must decide whether the motion signals arise from a single object or from multiple objects. A special case of this problem arises when two independently moving gratings are superimposed. The gratings tend to cohere and move unambiguously in a single direction (pattern motion) instead of moving independently (component motion). Here we report that the tendency to see pattern motion depends very strongly on the luminance of the intersections (that is, to regions where the gratings overlap) relative to that of the gratings in a way that closely parallels the physics of transparency. When the luminance of these regions is chosen appropriately, pattern motion is destroyed and replaced by the appearance of two transparent gratings moving independently. The observations imply that motion detecting mechanisms in the visual system must have access to tacit 'knowledge' of the physics of transparency and that this knowledge can be used to segment the scene into different objects. The same knowledge could, in principle, be used to avoid confusing shadows with real object boundaries.

Humans↗