SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Abnormalities of pre-mRNA splicing are increasingly recognized as an important mechanism through which gene mutations cause disease. However, apart from the mutations in the donor and acceptor sites, the effects on splicing of other sequence variations are difficult to predict. Loosely defined exonic and intronic sequences have been shown to affect splicing efficiency by means of silencing and enhancement mechanisms. Thus, nucleotide substitutions in these sequences can induce aberrant splicing. Web-based resources have recently been developed to facilitate the identification of nucleotide changes that could alter splicing. However, computer predictions do not always correlate with in vivo splicing defects. The issue of unclassified variants in cancer predisposing genes is very important both for the correct ascertainment of cancer risk and for the understanding of the basic mechanisms of cancer gene function and regulation. Therefore we aimed to verify how predictions that can be drawn from in silico analysis correlate with results obtained in an in vivo splicing assay. RESULTS: We analysed 99 hMLH1 and hMSH2 missense mutations with six different algorithms. Transfection of three different cell lines with 20 missense mutations, showed that a minority of them lead to defective splicing. Moreover, we observed that some exons and some mutations show cell-specific differences in the frequency of exon inclusion. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the available algorithms, while potentially helpful in identifying splicing modulators especially when they are located in weakly defined exons, do not always correspond to an obvious modification of the splicing pattern. Thus caution must be used in assessing the pathogenicity of a missense or silent mutation with prediction programs. The variations observed in the splicing proficiency in three different cell lines suggest that nucleotide changes may dictate alternative splice site selection in a tissue-specific manner contributing to the widely observed phenotypic variability in inherited cancers.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We examined mismatch repair (MMR)-defective diploid strains of budding yeast grown for approximately 160 generations to determine whether decreases in spore viability due to the uncovering of recessive lethal mutations correlated with an increase in gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs). No GCRs were detected despite dramatic decreases in spore viability, suggesting that frameshift and/or other unrepaired DNA replication lesions play a greater role than chromosomal instability in decreasing viability in MMR-defective strains.
Preclinical studies have demonstrated a relationship between DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status and sensitivity to cisplatin and carboplatin. MMR-deficient cells are resistant to both drugs, and selection for cisplatin resistance in vitro is sometimes accompanied by loss of MMR protein expression. We used immunohistochemical staining techniques to investigate hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression in paired ovarian tumor sections from 54 ovarian cancer patients before and after platinum-based therapy. We sought associations between hMLH1 and hMSH2 protein expression and clinical parameters known to be of prognostic significance as well as response to treatment and overall survival. hMLH1 and hMSH2 staining decreased significantly after platinum-based therapy. The percent of malignant cells that stained positive correlated with the intensity of nuclear staining for both proteins; staining for hMLH1 correlated well with staining for hMSH2. Unexpectedly, expression of nuclear hMLH1 correlated negatively with response to treatment. Expression of nuclear hMLH1 and hMSH2 was positively correlated with pretreatment CA125 level, and expression of nuclear hMSH2 was positively correlated with change in CA125 level after treatment. Tumor stage was associated with expression of nuclear hMSH2, and tumor histological subtype was associated with both hMLH1 and hMSH2 staining. No association was found between expression of either protein and overall survival. These results indicate that the tumor is biologically altered after chemotherapy consistent with treatment-induced selection for cells expressing lower hMLH1 and hMSH2 levels. However, immunohistochemical staining for either hMLH1 or hMSH2 was not highly predictive of drug sensitivity as measured by response or survival.
Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is one of the most common genetic diseases comprising at least 5-6% of all colorectal cancers. It is characterized by early onset and mostly right-sided tumors (proximal to the splenic flexure). Molecular analyses are useful methods for diagnosis in index patients and for the detection of risk persons in affected families. A 37-year-old female patient whose family history fulfilled the criteria for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) was studied using PCR and DNA sequencing for the detection of mutations in the mismatch repair genes hMSH2 and hMLH1. Additionally, literature was reviewed (MEDLINE research until 2000) concerning clinical guidelines for surveillance in HNPCC families. A new deletion of two adenosine nucleotides (190-191 del AA) at codon 64 in exon 2 of the hMLH1 gene was found. The frameshift led to a stop codon at amino acid position 75. This mutation is considered to be disease causing in the development of the colorectal cancer of this family. Six publications with detailed recommendations for the surveillance of risk persons were found in the literature. Following their guidelines, colonoscopy is recommended from 20-30 years on for members of a family who fulfills either the Amsterdam criteria or the Bethesda criteria in combination with a detection of microsatellite instability. Female risk persons should be investigated gynecologically, including a transvaginal ultrasound examination, from 25-35 years on for the early detection of endometrial or ovarian cancer. Recommendations for gastroscopy, abdominal ultrasound examination and urine analysis are not given in all publications. Genetic counseling is recommended from 18 years on for all members of affected families.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The hMLH1 protein, composed of 756 amino acids, is the human homologue of the bacterial DNA mismatch repair protein MutL, and germ line mutations of the hMLH1 gene have been identified in kindreds with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. We have detected three alternatively spliced forms of hMLH1 mRNA in normal lymphocytes and tissues. One of the spliced forms lacks the coding region of hMLH1 from codons 227 to 295 and the two other transcripts are predicted to encode two truncated proteins retaining the 264 and 226 N-terminal amino acids of hMLH1, respectively. The biological significance of this alternative splicing remains to be established.
BACKGROUND: The human Mut-L-Homologon-1 (MLH1) and Mut-S-Homologon-2 (MSH2) are post replication mismatch repair (MMR) genes. METHODS: We examined the correlation of the clinical features of 122 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with the expression of MLH1 and MSH2 by immunohistochemical analysis. RESULTS: According to our criteria, 34 and 25 cases did not express MLH1 and MSH2, respectively. Expression of both the MLH1 and MSH2 gene products was observed in 73 (59.8%) cases; loss of MLH1 or MSH2 expression was detected in 35(28.7%) cases. Fourteen (11.5%) cases demonstrated loss of both MLH1 and MSH2 expression in ESCC. Loss of MLH1 and/or MSH2 gene expression significantly correlated with increases in malignancy, as evidenced by increases in the existence of metastatic lymph nodes (P = 0.0056), extensive invasion (P = 0.0007), and poor differentiation (P = 0.0992). The MLH1-negative patients had a significantly poorer prognosis than those in the MLH1-positive group (P = 0.0043). Similar results were observed for MSH2 expression (P = 0.0002). Patients both MLH1 and MSH2 negative exhibited the most poor clinical outcome than other patients (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: We conclude that MMR protein expression, detected by immunohistochemistry, is a useful marker providing information necessary to decide appropriate therapeutic strategies in patients with ESCC.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The optimal strategy for the detection of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) gene carriers remains uncertain. We evaluated whether microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis or MSH2 and MLH1 protein immunostaining of tumors will screen individuals efficiently for germline MSH2 and MLH1 testing. METHODS: We performed a case-series study of 114 eligible families enrolled in our high-risk colorectal cancer (CRC) registry. Medical history data were collected on probands and relatives. MSI analysis was performed on proband tumors, and MSH2 and MLH1 protein immunostaining was assessed. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis was used to identify germline MSH2 or MLH1 mutations in probands found to have tumors with high-frequency MSI. RESULTS: Tumor tissue and adequate clinical data were available in 109 of the 114 families. Amsterdam criteria and Bethesda guidelines were met by 23% and 70% of the families, respectively. High-frequency MSI was identified in the proband tumors in 47 of the 109 families (43%). Germline MSH2 and MLH1 gene testing was carried out in the probands of 32 of 47 families with MSI-H tumors. Mutations were detected in 16 families (9 in MSH2 and 7 in MLH1) and sequence variants of uncertain significance in 5 families (1 in MSH2 and 4 in MLH1). Germline mutations or sequence variants of uncertain significance were detected in 15 of 19 (79%) of our Amsterdam families and in 6 of 13 (46%) of our non-Amsterdam families with MSI-H tumors. MSH2 and MLH1 protein immunostaining was assessed in 38 of the 47 MSI-H tumors. Unequivocal loss of hMLH1 expression was found in 20 tumors and loss of MSH2 expression in 9 tumors. Corresponding loss of protein expression was seen in 17 of 18 (94%) of tumors from probands with germline mutations or variants. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of high-frequency MSI or the loss of MSH2 or MLH1 immunostaining in CRCs are both useful criteria for selecting high-risk patients who should be tested for germline mutations in MSH2 or MLH1.