Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Filgrastim”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

CHOP is superior to CNOP in elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma while outcome is unaffected by filgrastim treatment: results of a Nordic Lymphoma Group randomized trial.

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) during induction chemotherapy with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, prednisone) or CNOP (doxorubicin replaced with mitoxantrone) in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) improves time to treatment failure (TTF), complete remission (CR) rate, and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, the efficacy of CHOP versus CNOP chemotherapy was compared. A total of 455 previously untreated patients older than 60 years with stages II to IV aggressive NHL were included in the analysis. Patients (median age, 71 years; range, 60-86 years) were randomized to receive CHOP (doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2)) or CNOP (mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2)) with or without G-CSF (5 microg/kg from day 2 until day 10-14 of each cycle every 3 weeks; 8 cycles). Forty-seven patients previously hospitalized for class I to II congestive heart failure were randomized to receive CNOP with or without G-CSF (not included in the CHOP versus CNOP analysis). The CR rates in the CHOP/CNOP plus G-CSF and CHOP/CNOP groups were the same, 52%, and in the CHOP with or without G-CSF and CNOP with or without G-CSF groups, 60% and 43% (P <.001), respectively. No benefit of G-CSF in terms of TTF and OS could be shown (P =.96 and P =.22, respectively), whereas CHOP was superior to CNOP (TTF/OS P <.001). The incidences of severe granulocytopenia (World Health Organization grade IV) and granulocytopenic infections were higher in patients not receiving G-CSF. The cumulative proportion of patients receiving 90% or more of allocated chemotherapy was higher (P <.05) in patients receiving G-CSF. Concomitant G-CSF treatment did not improve CR rate, TTF, or OS. Patients receiving CHOP fared better than those given CNOP chemotherapy. The addition of G-CSF reduces the incidence of severe granulocytopenia and infections in elderly patients with aggressive NHL receiving CHOP or CNOP chemotherapy.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Repetitive cycles of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin intensification with peripheral-blood progenitor cells and filgrastim in advanced breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: As an alternative to single-cycle cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb) intensification, we evaluated the feasibility of administering one-quarter dose CTCb for four cycles with peripheral-blood progenitor-cell (PBPC) and filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF]) in advanced-stage breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 1992 to August 1993, 20 stage IIIB (n = 7) and IV (n = 13) breast cancer patients received 78 cycles of induction with doxorubicin 90 mg/m2 by intravenous (IV) bolus with G-CSF 5 microg/kg/d by subcutaneous injection (SC) repeated every 14 to 21 days for four cycles. PBPC were collected by 2-hour single-blood volume leukapheresis on 2 consecutive days at the time of hematologic recovery from each cycle of doxorubicin. Eighteen patients received 61 cycles of intensification with cyclophosphamide 1,500 mg/m2, thiotepa 125 mg/m2, and carboplatin 200 mg/m2 by IV continuous infusion with G-CSF 10 microg/kg/d SC and PBPC support repeated every 21 to 42 days for four cycles. RESULTS: Twelve of 20 patients (60%) completed all four planned cycles of doxorubicin induction followed by four cycles of one-quarter dose CTCb intensification. Statistically significantly decreases in the yield of mononuclear cells (MNC) (median slope per day, -0.032; P = .03), granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming unit (CFU-GM) (median slope per day, -0.57; P = .0008), and burst-forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E) (median slope per day, -1.18; P = .006) were observed over the course of the eight leukaphereses. Of 18 patients who began CTCb, 12 (67%) completed four cycles. Six patients were removed from study during intensification: two for progressive disease (PD), one refused further treatment, and three for dose-limiting hematologic toxicity. A fourth patient fulfilled the criteria for dose-limiting hematologic toxicity after cycle 4. The toxicity of the multiple cycle CTCb intensification regimen consisted of grade IV leukopenia, grade IV thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia in 100%, 100%, and 26% of cycles, respectively. The median duration of each CTCb cycle was 24 days (range, 18 to 63), and the median duration of an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < or = 500/microL and platelet count < or = 20,000/microL during each cycle was 6 days (range, 2 to 15) and 4 days (range, 0 to 38), respectively. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to administer repetitive cycles of one-quarter dose CTCb intensification with PBPC and G-CSF. Additional studies are required to determine whether multiple cycles of CTCb intensification might offer a therapeutic advantage over a single high-dose cycle.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Multicycle high-dose chemotherapy and filgrastim-mobilized peripheral-blood progenitor cells in women with high-risk stage II or III breast cancer: five-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of multiple cycles of dose-intensive, nonablative chemotherapy in women with poor-prognosis breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with stage II breast cancer and 10 or more involved nodes or four or more involved nodes and estrogen receptor-negative tumors and women with stage III disease received three cycles of epirubicin 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2, with progenitor cell and filgrastim support every 28 days (n = 79) or 21 days (n = 20). Patients were reviewed at least twice yearly thereafter. Twenty-six patients had bone marrow and apheresis collections assessed for the presence of micrometastatic tumor cells. RESULTS: Ninety-nine women (median age, 43 years; range, 24 to 60 years) were treated. Ninety-two completed all three cycles of chemotherapy. The major toxicity was severe, reversible myelosuppression that was more prolonged with successive cycles, and this did not differ between patients given treatment every 28 days and those treated every 21 days. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 176 (61%) of 287 cycles. Severe mucositis (grade 3 or 4) occurred in 23% of cycles but tended to be short-lived and was reversible. The cardiac ejection fraction fell by a median of 4% during treatment, and three patients developed evidence of cardiac failure after chemotherapy. Two patients (2%) died of acute toxicity. Three of 26 patients had evidence of circulating micrometastatic tumor cells. The actuarial distant disease-free and overall survival rates at 60-month follow-up were 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53% to 75%) and 67% (95% CI, 56% to 78%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Multiple cycles of dose-intensive, nonablative chemotherapy is a feasible and safe approach. Disease control and survival are similar to those in other studies of myeloablative chemotherapy in poor-prognosis breast cancer. The regimen is being evaluated in a randomized trial of the International Breast Cancer Study Group.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Multiple courses of high-dose ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide with peripheral-blood progenitor cells and filgrastim for small-cell lung cancer: A feasibility study by the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility and safety of multiple sequential courses of high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) administered in a multicenter setting to patients with small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-nine patients (limited disease, n = 30; extensive disease, n = 39) treated at 15 European centers were scheduled to receive three courses of high-dose chemotherapy with ifosfamide 10 g/m(2), carboplatin 1200 mg/m(2), and etoposide 1200 mg/m(2) (ICE) divided over 4 days at 28-day intervals. PBPCs were harvested before treatment and mobilized with epirubicin 150 mg/m(2) administered via an intravenous bolus divided over 2 days and filgrastim 5 microg/kg/d administered subcutaneously. RESULTS: The performed leukaphereses (one to five per patient) yielded a median of 16.6 x 10(6)/kg (range, 1.0 to 96.6 x 10(6)/kg) CD34(+) cells, which was sufficient for three reinfusions. Fifty patients (72%) completed the treatment according to schedule. Nine patients completed two courses, and six patients completed one course of treatment. The increase in dose-intensity was 290% that of a standard ICE regimen. The median duration of myelosuppression was similar between courses, namely 4 days (range, 1 to 12 days) for leukocytes less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L and 4 days (range, 0 to 22 days) for thrombocytes less than 20 x 10(9)/L. Febrile neutropenia developed in 66% of courses, severe diarrhea in 14%, mucositis in 10%, and nausea and vomiting in 21% of courses. There were six cases of toxic death (9%), most of which occurred in the first year of accrual and thus were attributable to the learning curve. The antitumor effect of the regimen was reflected in an 86% remission rate (95% confidence interval [CI], 74% to 93%), with 51% of patients achieving a complete response (95% CI, 38% to 63%). Median overall survival was 18 months for patients with limited disease and 11 months for patients with extensive disease. CONCLUSION: This multiple sequential high-dose ICE regimen could be safely administered on a multicenter basis to patients with small-cell lung cancer. The dose-intensity could be increased to 290% that of standard ICE regimen. The benefit of this approach is currently being tested in a randomized trial that aims to double the long-term rate of survival for patients with small-cell lung cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Infusional paclitaxel and weekly vinorelbine chemotherapy with concurrent filgrastim for metastatic breast cancer: high complete response rate in a phase I-II study of doxorubicin-treated patients.

PURPOSE: We investigated 96-hour paclitaxel infusion combined with weekly (days eight and 15) vinorelbine as salvage therapy for metastatic breast cancer in anthracycline-exposed patients. All patients received scheduled support with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim). Tumor response, toxicity, time to progression (TTP), and survival were assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center nonrandomized trial enrolled 32 patients. Anthracycline exposure and subsequent progression were common to all patients. Paclitaxel and vinorelbine were escalated over three dosing levels, stratified by liver function. RESULTS: Seven patients (22%) achieved a complete response and nine patients achieved a partial response for an overall response rate of 50%. The median TTP was 6.1 months, and median survival time was 14.1 months. Dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia, with dose delay or reduction in seven of 32 patients. Febrile neutropenia requiring hospitalization was uncommon (three of 32 patients; 9%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in two patients (6%), and 13 patients (41%) required RBC transfusions for anemia. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting was seen in one patient, who was found to be Addisonian. Despite potentially overlapping neurologic toxicities of the two agents, only two patients (6%) were removed from the study because of progressive peripheral neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Administration of 96-hour paclitaxel infusion and subsequent weekly vinorelbine with G-CSF support is well tolerated. The response rate, TTP, and survival data are encouraging for therapy given to anthracycline pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. If these results can be verified in multi-institution trials, this or a similar combination of drugs would merit investigation as first-line therapy in this patient population.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

High-versus standard-dose filgrastim (rhG-CSF) for mobilization of peripheral-blood progenitor cells from allogeneic donors and CD34(+) immunoselection.

PURPOSE: The efficacy of a high- versus a standard-dose filgrastim (recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, or rhG-CSF) regimen to mobilize peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for allogeneic transplantation was investigated in 75 healthy donors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 1994 to December 1997, 75 consecutive donors (median age, 38 years; range, 17 to 67 years) were assigned to two different schedules of rhG-CSF for PBPC mobilization. Fifty donors received 24 microg rhG-CSF/kg body weight (BW) divided into two daily subcutaneous injections (two doses of 12 microg, group A), whereas 25 were treated with 10 microg rhG-CSF once daily (group B). Apheresis was started on day 4 in group A and on day 5 in group B. Target CD34(+) cell numbers in apheresis products were >/= 4 x 10(6)/kg recipient BW. RESULTS: Cytokine priming and collection of PBPCs were equally well tolerated in both groups. Significantly higher CD34(+) cell numbers in group A with 3. 7 x 10(6)/kg recipient BW/apheresis (0.47 x 10(6)/L apheresis) compared with 2 x 10(6)/kg recipient BW/apheresis (0.25 x 10(6)/L apharesis) in group B were obtained (P <.05). Using standard aphereses (median, 9 L), two doses of 12 microg rhG-CSF/kg allowed collection of >/= 4 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells with two aphereses (range, one to three) in group A versus three aphereses (range, one to six) in group B (P <.015). Donor age, sex, and BW influenced the collection of CD34(+) cell numbers: in particular, significantly higher apheresis results were obtained in donors younger than 40 years compared with donors older than 40 years of age (P <.05). In 65 CD34(+) selection procedures using avidin-biotin immunoabsorption columns (Ceprate SC System, CellPro, Bothell, WA), a median CD34(+) purity of 53%, CD34(+) recovery of 40%, and the collection of 2 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells/selection were achieved. In group A with higher CD34(+) cells/kg/apheresis, CD34(+) purity, recovery, and cell yields were 60%, 45%, and 2.3 x 10(6)/kg/selection, respectively, as compared with 48%, 31%, and 0.7 x 10(6)/kg in group B (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that twice daily rhG-CSF (two doses of 12 microg/kg BM) compared with once daily rhG-CSF (10 microg/kg BW), in addition to being well tolerated, significantly improves PBPC mobilization, allows the collection of higher numbers of CD34(+) cells with one or two standard aphereses, and facilitates subsequent selection procedures in healthy allogeneic donors.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Final results of a randomized phase III trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with a dose-intensified epirubicin and cyclophosphamide + filgrastim as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer: an EORTC-NCIC-SAKK multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of a standard anthracycline-based regimen to a dose-intensified anthracycline regimen in locally advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Locally advanced breast cancer patients were randomly assigned onto a study comparing cyclophosphamide (C; 75 mg/m(2) orally days 1 to 14), epirubicin (E; 60 mg/m(2) intravenously [IV] days 1, 8), and fluorouracil (F; 500 mg/m(2) IV days 1, 8) six cycles every 28 days versus E (120 mg/m(2) IV day 1), C (830 mg/m(2) IV day 1), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim; 5 micro g/kg/d subcutaneously days 2 to 13) six cycles every 14 days. The study was designed to detect a 15% improvement; that is, from 50% to 65% in median progression-free survival (PFS) in favor of the dose-intensified regimen. RESULTS: A total of 448 patients were enrolled over a period of 3 years. The median dose intensity delivered for C and E reached, respectively, 85% and 87% of that planned in the CEF arm and 96% and 95% of that planned in the EC arm. The dose-intensified arm was slightly more emetogenic and generated more grade 3 to 4 anemia but less febrile neutropenia episodes. After a median follow-up of 5.5 years, 277 events have been reported. The median PFS was 34 and 33.7 months for CEF and EC, respectively (P =.68), and the 5-year survival rate was 53% and 51% for CEF and EC, respectively (P =.94). CONCLUSION: Dose-intensified EC does not provide a measurable therapeutic benefit over CEF as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unselected locally advanced breast cancer patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Phase III trial of doxorubicin plus cisplatin with or without paclitaxel plus filgrastim in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the addition of paclitaxel to doxorubicin plus cisplatin improves overall survival (OS) in women with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Secondary comparisons included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and toxicities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible, consenting patients received doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) (AP), or doxorubicin 45 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) (day 1), followed by paclitaxel 160 mg/m(2) (day 2) with filgrastim support (TAP). The initial doxorubicin dose in the AP arm was reduced to 45 mg/m(2) in patients with prior pelvic radiotherapy and those older than 65 years. Both regimens were repeated every 3 weeks to a maximum of seven cycles. Patients completed a neurotoxicity questionnaire before each cycle. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-three women (10 ineligible) were registered. Objective response (57% v 34%; P <.01), PFS (median, 8.3 v 5.3 months; P <.01), and OS (median, 15.3 v 12.3 months; P =.037) were improved with TAP. Treatment was hematologically well tolerated, with only 2% of patients receiving AP, and 3% of patients receiving TAP experiencing neutropenic fever. Neurologic toxicity was worse for those receiving TAP, with 12% grade 3, and 27% grade 2 peripheral neuropathy, compared with 1% and 4%, respectively, in those receiving AP. Patient-reported neurotoxicity was significantly higher in the TAP arm following two cycles of therapy. CONCLUSION: TAP significantly improves RR, PFS, and OS compared with AP. Evaluation of this regimen in the high-risk adjuvant setting is warranted, but close attention should be paid to the increased risk of peripheral neuropathy.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Impact of five prophylactic filgrastim schedules on hematologic toxicity in early breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the comparative efficacy of varying intensity schedules of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) support in preventing febrile neutropenia in early breast cancer patients treated with relatively high-dose epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (EC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 1991 to April 1994, 506 stage I and II breast cancer patients were randomly assigned to receive, in a factorial 2 x 2 design, epirubicin 120 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 21 days for 4 cycles +/- lonidamine +/- G-CSF. The following five consecutive G-CSF schedules were tested every 100 randomly assigned patients: (1) 480 microg/d subcutaneously days 8 to 14; (2) 480 microg/d days 8, 10, 12, and 14; (3) 300 microg/d days 8 to 14; (4) 300 microg/d days 8, 10, 12, and 14; and (5) 300 microg/d days 8 and 12. RESULTS: All of the G-CSF schedules covered the neutrophil nadir time. Schedule 5 was equivalent to the daily schedules (schedules 1 and 3) and to the alternate day schedules (schedules 2 and 4) with respect to incidence of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia (P = .79 and P = .89, respectively), rate of fever episodes (P = .84 and P = .77, respectively), incidence of neutropenic fever (P = .74 and P = .56, respectively), need of antibiotics (P = .77 and P = .88, respectively), and percentage of delayed cycles (P = .43 and P = .42, respectively). G-CSF had no significant impact on the delivered dose-intensity compared with the non-G-CSF arms. CONCLUSION: In the adjuvant setting, the frequency of prophylactic G-CSF administration during EC could be curtailed to only two administrations (days 8 and 12) without altering outcome. This nonrandomized trial design provides support for evaluating alternative, less intense G-CSF schedules for women with early breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Costs of peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation using whole blood mobilised by filgrastim as compared with autologous bone marrow transplantation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to compare the costs of autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) and whole blood transplantation in patients with relapsed or poorly responding non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. DESIGN AND SETTING: In a retrospective study, we calculated the treatment costs of 40 patients who received either ABMT or, alternatively, whole blood mobilised by filgrastim (a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: The recovery of granulocytes was markedly accelerated in the whole blood group as compared with the ABMT group. This resulted in a reduction in hospital costs, and costs for diagnostics and medical procedures, antibacterials, nutrition and blood transfusions. The average costs per patient in the whole blood group amounted to approximately $US16,890 as compared with approximately $US20,713 in the ABMT group (1995 values), implying a cost reduction of 18% when changing to whole blood reinfusion. CONCLUSIONS: With the premise that both therapies are equivalent, it seems that whole blood transplantation is more cost effective than ABMT.

Blood Transfusion↗
PubMed1997

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, filgrastim) after or during an intensive remission induction therapy for adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: effects, role of patient pretreatment characteristics, and costs.

An early intensive anthracycline therapy can improve therapeutic outcome in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) but is usually associated with marked myelosuppressive effects and significant morbidity by infections. To reduce this risk, we employed granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, filgrastim 5 microg/kg/d) as an adjunct to a myelotoxic, 14-day long induction regimen with idarubicin-vincristine-L-asparaginase-prednisone (IVAP). Owing to changes in study design, patients received 'late' (n = 28) or 'early' (n = 37) G-CSF from days 15 or 4 of IVAP, respectively, until resolution of severe neutropenia. Study endpoints included time to recovery from neutropenic nadir, duration of neutropenia <0.5 x 10(9)/l, incidence of infectious complications, assessment of variables affecting G-CSF response, clinical outcome and costs. Sixty-five consecutive cases were evaluable. Patients in early G-CSF group recovered significantly faster from the neutropenic nadir (p < 0.002), contracted less infectious complications (p = 0.007), and required less intravenous antibiotic (p = 0.008) and antifungal (p = 0.002) medications. Although these reductions did not compensate for the increased G-CSF treatment cost, the overall supportive care cost was not significantly increased by early G-CSF. Interestingly, T-ALL phenotype (p = 0.02) and higher neutrophil presentation count (p = 0.03) were associated with a shorter neutropenic course even with late G-CSF. Early G-CSF may be a valid approach to mitigate chemotherapy-induced neutropenia of IVAP and other similarly myelosuppressive adult ALL regimens.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Phase I trial of docetaxel with filgrastim support in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors: a collaborative Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute and Children's Cancer Group trial.

Neutropenia is the dose-limiting toxicity of docetaxel in children. This Phase I trial was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicities, and the incidence and severity of other toxicities of docetaxel with filgrastim (G-CSF) support in children with refractory solid tumors. Docetaxel was administered as an i.v. infusion for 1 h every 21 days with a starting dose of 150 mg/m2 and an escalation to 185 mg/m2 and 235 mg/m2 in subsequent patient cohorts. G-CSF (5 microg/kg/day) was administered s.c., starting 48 h after docetaxel and continuing until the post-nadir neutrophil count reached 10,000/microl. Seventeen patients received 27 courses of docetaxel with G-CSF support. Generalized erythematous desquamating skin rash and myalgias were dose-limiting at 235 mg/m2. Localized and generalized rashes were seen at all of the three dose levels. Neutropenia (median nadir, 95/1microl) occurred at all of the dose levels but was brief in duration and not dose-limiting. Thrombocytopenia was minimal (median platelet count nadir, 139,000/microl), and the severity of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia did not seem to be related to the docetaxel dose. Other docetaxel-related toxicities included hemorrhage (associated with mucositis), sepsis, hypersensitivity reaction, transient elevation of liver enzymes, stomatitis, back pain, asthenia, and neuropathy. One minor response was observed in a patient with colon cancer. The maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel with G-CSF support in children is 185 mg/m2, which is 50% higher than the maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel alone in children and 85 % higher than the recommended adult dose.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

[Pancytopenia caused by ticlopidine treated with filgrastim. Description of a case].

Ticlopidine is an antiplatelet agent that is used to reduce the occurrence of atherothrombotic arterial events, but it can sometime cause severe haematological side-effects. We describe the case of a 79-year old woman suffering from ischaemic cardiopathy and chronic cerebral vasculopathy treated with ticlopidine, who developed a rare pancytopenia on the 26th day of ticlopidine treatment. The patient was successful treated with intravenous antibiotics and with filgrastim, with complete reversion of the pancytopenia.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells versus bone marrow transplantation for treating leukemia: 3-year results from the EBMT randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) are now widely used as the source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation. However, it is still not clear which patients should receive mobilized PBPC or bone marrow cells to reconstitute hematopoiesis after myeloablative conditioning. The aim of this study is to present 3-year-follow-up data on outcome (incidence and severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) after a PBPC transplant (PBPCT) or a bone marrow transplant (BMT). DESIGN AND METHODS: Data on 350 patients with leukemia were collected in a multicenter, randomized study initiated by the EBMT. The patients were randomized to receive filgrastim-mobilized PBSCT or BMT from an HLA-identical donor. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 3 years, significantly more patients transplanted with PBPC than with bone marrow developed chronic GVHD (73% vs 55%, p=0.003) and extensive chronic GvHD (36% vs 19%, p=0.002). The higher incidence and greater severity of chronic GvHD had little impact on the patient's performance status or survival. OS was 58% for PBPCT recipients versus 65% among those undergoing BMT. LFS was 56% for PBPCT recipients versus 60% for BMT recipients. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Patients transplanted with PBPC from an HLA-identical sibling develop more chronic GvHD than those transplanted with bone marrow, but the final impact of this difference is unclear. Longer follow-up is necessary to characterize the impact of chronic GvHD on quality of life, leukemia-free survival and overall survival.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

[Biological properties and clinical application of filgrastim (G-CSF)].

Granulocyte--colony stimulating factor (G-CSF, filgrastim) is a glycoprotein hormone of the hematopoietin family that primarily influences the proliferation and differentiation of neutrophilic granulocytic precursors. As with all glyco-protein hormones, G-CSF interacts with target cells by binding to specific cell-surface receptors. It stimulates proliferation, differentiation and activation of cells of the neutrophil--granulocyte lineage and has been investigated as therapy for patients with various neutropenic conditions. A major use for recombinant G-CSF therapy will be in ameliorating the neutropenia which follows cytoreductive chemotherapy. The increase in neutrophils produced by this factor render it a useful treatment for conditions such as congenital, acquired and cyclic neutropenias. It may be an effective therapy in myelodysplasia and aplastic anaemia. G-CSF is also useful in accelerating the recovery of transplanted bone marrow in patients with leukaemia, lymphoma and solid tumors. G-CSF is well tolerated. The most frequently reported adverse effect is mild to moderate bone pain.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1994

Peripheral blood progenitors mobilised by G-CSF (filgrastim) and reinfused as unprocessed autologous whole blood shorten the pancytopenic period following high-dose melphalan in multiple myeloma.

Growth factor granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) is effective at progenitor release into the peripheral blood. After high-dose chemotherapy haematopoietic reconstitution occurs after reinfusion of these peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). However, the collection by leukapheresis and further processing of PBPC are very time consuming and expensive. We have studied the transplantation potential of a small volume of unprocessed autologous whole blood after G-CSF mobilisation. Six patients with plasma cell disorders received G-CSF 10 micrograms/kg sc during 6 days. Subsequently 11 of whole blood was collected by phlebotomy, kept unprocessed at room temperature and reinfused 24 h after high-dose melphalan 140 mg/m2. CFU-GM content was 845 per ml blood (median, range 320-3472) and CD34+ cells rose to a median percentage of 0.9 (range 0.4-2.0). Haematological recovery was significantly faster in the study group compared with the control group of 20 patients who received the same dose of melphalan without reinfusion of PBPC. The neutrophil count reached 0.5 x 10(9)/l at a median of 12.5 days after infusion of PBPC vs 38 days in the control group (p = 0.0003). The platelet count reached 20 x 10(9)/l after a median of 23.5 days vs 38 days (p = 0.0218). The shortened recovery was reflected by less transfusions, less antibiotic use and shortening of hospital stay (19 days vs 43 days, p = 0.0003). We conclude that this easy technique of mobilisation and collection of PBPC is very effective for hastening haematologic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) counts during steady-state hematopoiesis allow to estimate the yield of mobilized PBPC after filgrastim (R-metHuG-CSF)-supported cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) can be mobilized using cytotoxic chemotherapy and cytokines. There is a substantial variability in the yield of hematopoietic progenitor cells between patients. We were looking for predictive parameters indicating a patient's response to a given mobilization regimen. Multiparameter flow-cytometry analysis and clonogenic assays were used to examine the hematopoietic progenitor cells in bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) before filgrastim (R-metHuG-CSF; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA)-supported chemotherapy and in PB and leukapheresis products (LPs) in the recovery phase. Fifteen patients (four with high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [NHL], two with low-grade NHL, two with Hodgkin's disease, two with multiple myeloma, three with breast cancer, one with ovarian cancer, and one with germ cell tumor) were included in this study. The comparison of immunofluorescence plots showed a homogenous population of strongly CD34+ cells in steady-state and mobilized PB whereas in steady-state BM, the CD34+ cells ranged from strongly positive with continuous transition to the CD34- population. Consistent with the similarity in CD34 antigen expression, a correlation analysis showed steady-state PB CD34+ cells (r = .81, P < .001) and colony-forming cells (CFCs; r = .69, P < .01) to be a measure of a patient's mobilizable CD34+ cell pool. Individual estimates of progenitor cell yields could be calculated. With a probability of 95%, eg, 0.4 steady-state PB CD34+ cells x 10(6)/L allowed to collect in six LPs 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, the reported threshold-dose of progenitor cells required for rapid and sustained engraftment after high-dose therapy. For the total steady-state BM CD34+ cell population, a weak correlation (r = .57, P < .05) with the mobilized CD34+ cells only became apparent when an outlier was removed from the analysis. Neither the CD34+ immunologic subgroups defined by the coexpression of the myeloid lineage-associated antigens CD33 or CD45-RA or the phenotypically primitive CD34+/HLA-DR- subset nor the BM CFC count had a predictive value for the mobilization outcome. This may be caused by the additional presence of maturing progenitor cells in BM, which express lower levels of the CD34 antigen and do not circulate. Our results permit us to recognize patients who are at risk to collect low numbers of progenitor cells and those who are likely to achieve sufficient or high progenitor cell yields even before mobilization chemotherapy is administered.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Results of a randomised, controlled, multicentre study of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) in patients with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation.

In 54 patients with malignant lymphoma, haematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) was compared between patients randomised to receive 10 or 30 micrograms/kg/day of r-metHuG-CSF (filgrastim) or no growth factor. After standard high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, etoposide and BCNU (CVB regimen for patients with Hodgkin's disease) or BCNU, etoposide, cytosine arabinoside and melphalan (BEAM regimen for patients suffering from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) followed by autologous BMT, r-metHuG-CSF was administered by continuous intravenous infusion from the first day after autologous BMT until neutrophil recovery. When the r-metHuG-CSF groups were compared with the control group the major findings were: the median time to reach an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > or = 0.5 x 10(9)/L was 20 days in the control group and 12 and 14 days, respectively, in the r-metHuG-CSF groups (P = 0.0004). The duration of neutropenia (ANC < 0.5 x 10(9)/L) was reduced from 27 days in the control group to 11 and 13 days in the r-metHuG-CSF groups (P = 0.0001). In addition, fewer days of febrile neutropenia were observed in the r-metHuG-CSF groups (5 and 6 days) than in the control group (10 days; P = 0.036). No significant effects of r-metHuG-CSF administration on the number of days with fever, the use of intravenous antibiotics and hospitalisation were detected. R-metHuG-CSF was well tolerated without any serious side-effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗