SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
We report a case of esophageal perforation in a premature infant probably related to instrumentation. The child had also received the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, indomethacin. An exhaustive review of the literature has been done to define the clinical profile and current recommendations for management.
BACKGROUND: Perforation of the esophagus is a deadly injury that requires expert management for survival. METHODS: We performed a retrospective clinical review of 66 patients treated at Emory University affiliated hospitals for esophageal perforation between 1973 and 1993. RESULTS: Iatrogenic perforations accounted for 48 injuries (73%), barogenic perforations occurred in 12 patients (17%), trauma was causative in 3 (5%), and 3 patients had esophageal infection and other causes. Lower-third injuries occurred in 43 cases (65%), middle third in 14 (21%), and upper third in 9 (14%). Early contained perforations were managed successfully by limiting oral intake and giving parenteral antibiotics in 12 patients. Cervical perforations were drained without attempt at closure of the leak. Perforations with mediastinal or pleural contamination recognized early were managed by primary closure and drainage in 28 patients. Reinforcement of the primary closure using stomach fundus, pleural, diaphragmatic, or pericardial flap was performed in 16 patients. Those perforations that escaped early recognition required thoughtful management, using generous debridement and drainage and sometimes esophageal resection. The esophageal T tube provided control of leaks in 3 of these patients and was a useful adjunct. Using these management principles, we achieved a 76% survival rate for all patients. Six patients with perforations complicating endoesophageal management of esophageal varices were a high-risk subset with an 83% mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal perforation remains an important thoracic emergency. Aggressive operative therapy remains the mainstay for treatment; however, conservative management may be preferred for contained perforations and the esophageal T tube may be used for late perforations.
A case of mediastinitis and mediastinal abscess due to cervical esophageal perforation in a 9/12 month old girl who was a victim of child abuse and possible sexual assault is reported. Injury to the hypopharynx or esophagus with child abuse as a possible etiology should be considered when an infant or young child presents with unexplained erythematous neck swelling, subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum and/or wide mediastinum.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nonoperative treatment of esophageal perforation (EP) in children. Between 1999 and 2004, 13 episodes in 12 patients were evaluated. The treatment program consisted of broad-spectrum antibiotics, nasopharyngeal aspiration, parenteral and/or enteral nutrition by gastrostomy, and pleural effusion or mediastinal abscess drainage when required. Mean age of the patients was 3.75 +/- 1.13 (range 3-7 years). Two patients (16.7%) were girls and 10 patients (83.3%) were boys. Chest pain was found 76.9% of all EP episodes (10 of 13 perforations), followed by dyspnea in 69.2% (9 of 13), vomiting in 46.1% (6 of 13), fever in 46.1% (6 of 13), and epigastric pain in 7.6% (1 of 13). No deaths occurred. In children, in contrast with the adults, EP can be treated safely by nonoperative methods.
Esophageal rupture after transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) is a rare but life-threatening complication. Risk factors for perforation include spasm or hypertrophy of the cricopharyngeal sphincter, cervical arthritis, forward and left lateral bending of the distal esophagus, and esophageal disease such as inflammation or neoplasm. We present the case of a 80-year-old woman who developed perforation of her esophagus after TEE. Prior irradiation to the chest due to treatment for breast cancer and subsequent fibrosis probably contributed to this complication. Physicians referring patients for a TEE and physicians performing this procedure should be aware for the risk of perforation. The identification of risk factors and gentle maneuvering of the probe may prevent this severe, life-threatening complication.
In spite of the many manipulations that are done in the upper airways of neonates, esophageal perforations are rare. But they may be life-threatening if not recognized and treated immediately. Along with a case history we present clinical and radiologic symptoms of a right sided pneumothorax and the feeding tube in the posterior phrenic recess. The principles of treatment are conservative with antibiotics and intravenous gavage feeding. Only with complications intensive radiography with contrast agents and surgery become necessary.
Esophageal perforations are surgical emergencies with high mortality rates. A variety of treatment strategies have been advocated. No single strategy has however, been fully applicable to deal with most situations. The aim of this study was to investigate if treatment with covered expandable metallic stents could offer a feasible option for the management of a leaking esophagus regardless of cause. Twenty-two consecutive patients with perforation or leakage from the intrathoracic esophagus were endoscopically treated with placement of a covered expandable metallic stent. Nine patients had esophageal cancer and 13 had benign underlying disease of whom two had a leakage from a surgical anastomosis. The leakage could be sealed in all but one patient. This patient died after an open esophageal diversion procedure. Twelve patients had an uneventful recovery, whereas three patients needed percutaneous drainage of abscesses and one drainage of the pleural cavity through a small thoracotomy. One patient required a conventional thoracotomy to drain the mediastinum. In total five (23%) patients died from the perforation within 30 days. Two of the deaths were unrelated and three (14%) related to the perforation. In patients with benign disease stents were removed or replaced after 3 weeks. In total 17 stents were successfully removed. Leakage from a damage esophagus can be effectively covered by expandable metallic stents seemingly regardless of the underlying cause and is likely to offer a good chance of survival even in severely ill patients.
A review was conducted to ascertain whether patients who suffered spontaneous postemetic esophageal rupture (Boerhaave's syndrome) experienced higher morbidity and mortality than patients who had endoscopic iatrogenic esophageal perforations. Review of the records of three medical centers from 1960 to 1985 identified 11 patients with Boerhaave's syndrome (group B) and 19 with iatrogenic perforations (group E). In group B, four patients were diagnosed greater than 24 h after perforation. Nine were treated surgically; of these one died. Two group B patients who were treated conservatively survived. In group E, only four patients were diagnosed greater than 24 h after perforation. Of 19 patients, 15 were treated surgically and four, medically. In group E, three patients died (one surgically and two conservatively treated). This study suggests that there is little difference in mortality between the two groups of patients as long as the diagnosis is made early and therapy is instituted promptly.
A study was made of all patients who underwent management for distal esophageal perforation at the Fairfax Hospital from September 1979 to September 1990. The study group consisted of 13 patients. Nine were male, four female. Mean age was 60.8 yrs, ranging from 36 to 83 yrs. In the group of nine patients diagnosed early (less than 24 hrs), hospital mortality was 22.2% versus 75% in the group of four diagnosed late (greater than 24 hrs). Of the six patients treated conservatively, either medically or surgically, only one survived, but all seven patients diagnosed early and aggressively operated upon survived. Thus the authors agree with others in espousing aggressive, definitive surgery for patients diagnosed early.
The authors surveyed the Cervical Spine Research Society to compile a series of esophageal perforations following anterior cervical spine surgery. Twenty-two cases were assembled. Six occurred at the time of surgery, 6 in the postoperative period, and 10 weeks to months later. Eight surgeries were because of fracture. Hardware was implicated in 25% of cases occurring after surgery. Diagnosis was confirmed most often by direct vision at reexploration or esophography. Treatment usually consisted of drainage, repair, and parenteral antibiotics; 2 cases were successfully treated by enteral feeding and antibiotics alone. There was one fatality, and all patients required prolonged hospitalization. Cervical fracture and the use of hardware may be associated with this complication. Clinical suspicion and esophography are important diagnostic tools. Drainage and parenteral antibiotics are recommended treatment.
We report a case of cervical abscess after the ingestion of foreign body (chicken bone) secondary to probable esophageal perforation that it was sent to us with suspicion of mediastinal complication. The girl, 17 years-old, nothing else to arrive our hospitalary center required entrance in ICU due to her severe clinical process: High fever, intense neck-thoracic pain, laterocervical diffuse and progressive left inflammation and bad general state. The CT showed the presence of a well defined abscess and abundant aerial component that dissected the cervical muscles that made necessary to perform drainage verifying intraoperatively no mediastinal involvement. The culture of the purulent collection revealed Streptococcus anginosus/milleri resistant to clindamicine but sensible to penicilina and derivatives. We exposed a serie of considerations at respect of such microorganism and its clinical signification.
We experienced a case of 47-year-old man who suffered swallowed fish bone-induced esophageal perforation with purulent mediastinitis and underwent direct suture closure of the perforation and reinforcement with a pedicled parietal pleura four days after the onset. Postoperative esophageal suture insufficiency was occured and reoperation was performed two months after the first operation. The esophageal fistula was plugged with a pedicled omental graft successfully. The postoperative course of the patient was uneventful and he discharged 45 days after the second operation. A reinforcement by pedicled omental graft for esophageal rupture accompanied with mediastinitis was considered to be a useful procedure.
Spontaneous rupture of esophagus (Boerhaave's Syndrome) in neonates is a rare occurrence. However iatrogenic perforation of the esophagus is not that uncommon, especially in a premature. The presentation of esophageal perforation is rather stereotyped. In the present case however patient presented with unusual features.
A 6-year-old boy with aphagia presented with a radiolucent foreign body, esophageal perforation, mediastinitis, and a C6-C7 spondylodiscitis. A rigid plastic gear wheel was removed via thoracotomy, and the mediastinal abscess was drained through the esophagomediastinal fistula. Treatment included antibiotics as well as nonsurgical orthopedic management of the spondylodiscitis. The recovery period was uneventful, and the patient has remained asymptomatic for 2 years. Physicians must be aware of radiolucent foreign bodies. Computed tomography is very helpful in establishing the diagnosis of radiolucent foreign body, mediastinal abscess, and spondylodiscitis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
An injury to the pharynx and esophagus is a known complication of anterior cervical spine surgery. Two cases of delayed pharyngo-esophageal perforation following anterior cervical spine surgery that resulted in fistula are presented. We postulate that graft displacement and dislodgement of implant with resulting esophageal erosion was responsible for this complication.
The initial treatment for achalasia in most centers is pneumatic dilation (PD). The most significant complication of PD is esophageal perforation (EP). During the past ten years, six patients were noted to have EP after PD at St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center. The cornerstone of treatment is early diagnosis. Operative repair, including suture of the perforation and modified Heller esophagomyotomy without anti-reflux procedure, is preferred. Details of this operation are presented. We have successfully managed five patients with EP after PD. A sixth patient died of unrecognized EP.
Ingestion of coins by children is a common event that rarely causes serious complications. We present a case of asymptomatic esophageal perforation by a penny in a child who presented with wheezing six months after the ingestion. When esophagography and triple endoscopy failed to show the perforation, thoracotomy resulted in successful removal of the foreign body, which was encased in granulation tissue between the trachea and esophagus. Complications of foreign body ingestion are discussed.