Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ENDOSCOPY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Evaluating virtual endoscopy for clinical use.

Virtual endoscopy is a term used to describe computer simulated endoscopy procedures derived from high resolution images of patient anatomy. By simulating the endoscopic examination, the patient is spared the discomfort and possible complications of an actual examination. The physician also has more flexibility in a virtual endoscopic examination of 3D patient data in comparison to a real endoscopic examination. Virtual endoscopy removes the physical and physiologic constraints of real endoscopy and can create views that are not possible in an actual endoscopic examination. This may enhance the performance of actual endoscopic examinations. Virtual endoscopy may also be used to perform "numerical biopsies"; anatomic measurements such as size, distance, shape, and density. Virtual endoscopy allows the physician to comprehensively explore the patient anatomy using an intuitive and interactive interface. There are currently two technical approaches to performing virtual endoscopy: perspective volume rendering and surface rendering of polygonal models. Perspective volume rendering uses traditional volumetric rendering algorithms to create visualizations directly from the volumetric dataset. Polygonal models require a preprocessing step to convert the segmented volume information into a polygonal surface that may be displayed at real time frame rates. Both paradigms have inherent strengths and weaknesses. We illustrate and compare the methods on actual patient data, including simulated endoscopic examinations of the airways, colon and esophagus. Preliminary results in virtual endoscopy show promise and will continue to be an area of active research leading to useful clinical applications.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2005

The economic impact of incorporating flexible endoscopy into a community general surgery practice.

BACKGROUND: Flexible endoscopy is a vital component of gastrointestinal surgery. It has and will replace many of the surgical procedures now commonly performed. Flexible endoscopy, unfortunately, is not an integral part of surgical residency training based on resident operative experience as reported by the Residency Review Committee. Moreover, general surgeons have deferred the practice of flexible endoscopy to the gastroenterologists because of concerns over turf battles and referral patterns. The purpose of this study was to assess the overall case load and the economic impact of flexible endoscopy on the practice of general surgery in a community hospital setting. METHODS: This retrospective review was performed over a 6-month period. The total cases and the total billings of inpatient and outpatient procedures for a group practice of five general surgeons in a community hospital were evaluated. The billings were the actual charges based on current procedural terminology (CPT) codes for these procedures using the Medicare fee schedule. RESULTS: Of the 2,159 procedures performed, 1,154 involved flexible endoscopy cases accounting for 54% of all cases (1,154 of 2,159) performed from February 1, 2003 to July 31, 2003. Flexible endocopy accounted for 43% of the total charges. A. total of 46 surgical procedures and 216 future endoscopies were generated from the flexible endoscopic procedures. Future endoscopic cases were for surveillance of colonic neoplasia and Barrett's esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible endoscopy contributed to a major portion of the caseload and revenue generated by the general surgery group studied. The overall impact of flexible endoscopy is even greater than reported because of the future endoscopic surveillance cases or surgical interventions generated on the basis of endoscopic findings.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed2004

Unsedated endoscopy.

Unsedated endoscopy will likely play an increasingly important role in the daily practice of GI endoscopy. Although there is adequate evidence that un-sedated endoscopy is technically feasible in selected patient populations, there area number of obstacles preventing its widespread adoption. Small-caliber endoscopy is not as accurate as conventional EGD. This may be remedied as improvements in endoscope technology emerge. Many patients refuse to consider an unsedated examination, and those who do participate report more symptoms of discomfort than patients undergoing conventional endoscopy. Whether patients will accept mild discomfort in exchange for substantial cost savings has not been evaluated. Finally, although unsedated endoscopy seems to have a low complication rate, its safety has not been formally addressed in large studies. Large, randomized, controlled studies are needed to better determine the role of un-sedated small-caliber endoscopy in daily practice. Unsedated colonoscopy may follow the footsteps of unsedated upper endoscopy with even more obstacles to overcome before its widespread application.

Colonoscopy↗
PubMed2002

Capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of patients with suspected small intestinal bleeding: Results of a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: A video capsule has been developed to acquire photographic images of the small intestine during normal peristaltic motion. METHODS: Patients between 21 and 80 years of age referred for enteroscopy because of obscure GI bleeding were offered entry into a trial in which they would undergo both capsule endoscopy and subsequent push enteroscopy. Results of capsule examinations were compared with push enteroscopy findings. Capsule endoscopy was performed with the Given M2A video capsule system. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (12 women, 9 men, average age 61 years) were enrolled, all of whom completed the study. A bleeding site was found in 11 of 20 patients during capsule endoscopy. No additional intestinal diagnoses were made by enteroscopy. The yield of push enteroscopy in the evaluation of obscure bleeding was 30% (6/20), the yield of capsule endoscopy 55% (11/20). This difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.0625). Capsule endoscopy found a distal source of bleeding in 5 of 14 patients who had normal push enteroscopic examinations. Patients preferred capsule endoscopy to enteroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates that capsule endoscopy provides excellent visualization of the small intestine, is well tolerated by patients, and is safe. Capsule endoscopy identified small intestinal bleeding sites beyond the range of push enteroscopy.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Cardiovascular complications after GI endoscopy: occurrence and risks in a large hospital system.

BACKGROUND: There is limited information concerning the risks for, and occurrence of, cardiovascular complications because of GI endoscopy. Published data are based on questionnaire surveys, which have a potential for bias. Moreover, available studies pertain exclusively to out-patients. METHODS: In-patients and day-stay patients who incurred charges for endoscopy with endoscopic procedure coding from 1999 through 2001 were identified from a financial database for all 9 hospitals in a large health care system. From these patients, those considered "at risk" for cardiovascular complications were selected based on charges for cardioactive medications, cardiac enzyme determinations, or intensive care services on the day of or the day after endoscopy. Medical records were reviewed for 25% of these patients, selected at random, noting demographics, history, and a modified Goldman score in patients with cardiovascular complications (defined as arrhythmia, chest pain or anginal equivalent, hypotension or myocardial infarction occurring within 24 hours after endoscopy). Identical information was obtained from a random sample of 0.5% of the chart records for all patients undergoing endoscopy. RESULTS: Patients who underwent endoscopy were not reliably identified for one hospital. This hospital was omitted from the calculation of the extrapolated rate of complication occurrence, but patients identified through chart review as having or not having a complication after endoscopy were included in the risk analysis. The extrapolated rate of occurrence of cardiovascular complications was 308: 95% CI [197, 457] per 100,000 procedures. Independent risk factors were: male gender, modified Goldman score, and use of propofol. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients undergoing hospital-based GI endoscopy, the risk of procedure-related cardiovascular complications was 2 to 70 times higher than previously reported. This finding may be ascribed to differences in the populations sampled and to a case-finding method that minimized reporting and ascertainment biases.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Second capsule endoscopy for patients with severe iron deficiency anemia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with iron deficiency anemia are subjected to multiple endoscopic and radiologic examinations of the GI tract. If negative, some of the examinations are repeated, occasionally with positive findings. The diagnostic yield of a second capsule endoscopy in such patients is unknown. The aim of the current study was to assess the diagnostic yield of a second capsule endoscopy in patients with significant iron deficiency anemia and a previous negative evaluation. METHODS: Twenty patients with iron deficiency anemia (Hb < 10 g/dL) were enrolled. All had at least one normal evaluation of the GI tract, including capsule endoscopy. A second capsule endoscopy examination was offered to all patients. RESULTS: The time between the first and the second capsule endoscopy ranged from 2 months to 1 year. Depending on the nature of an abnormality and its relevance to blood loss, the findings were classified as positive, suspicious, clinically irrelevant, or negative. In 7 patients, the second capsule endoscopy disclosed findings that were classified as either positive or suspicious findings, including arteriovenous malformations (2), flat polypoid lesion (1), edematous inflamed mucosa (1), erosions (1), and hemorrhagic gastritis (1). Lesions were located in the small intestine (5), the stomach (1), and the cecum (1). Based on the findings of the second capsule endoscopy, therapy was changed in two patients (10%). CONCLUSIONS: A second capsule endoscopy should be considered for patients with severe iron deficiency anemia and negative initial evaluation.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

The optimal age threshold for screening upper endoscopy for uninvestigated dyspepsia in Taiwan, an area with a higher prevalence of gastric cancer in young adults.

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that 1% to 2% of patients with dyspepsia are associated with gastric cancer. To avoid missing gastric cancer, most guidelines recommend that patients over 45 years old should undergo EGD for uninvestigated dyspepsia. In Taiwan, however, the prevalence of gastric cancer in younger patients is higher than that of Western countries. The optimal age threshold for endoscopy in patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia in Taiwan remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to determine an optimal age threshold for screening endoscopy in patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia to avoid missing gastric cancer in Taiwan. METHODS: We reviewed the findings in all adult patients who underwent upper endoscopy because of uninvestigated dyspepsia at the National Taiwan University Hospital. In those patients with confirmed gastric cancer histology, further analysis was performed. Cumulative age frequency distributions for gastric cancer were calculated according to gender and to the presence or the absence of alarm features. The stages of gastric cancer also were analyzed according to the presence or the absence of alarm symptoms. RESULTS: During the 5-year period, a total of 17,894 patients received upper endoscopy caused by uninvestigated dyspepsia. Gastric cancer was found in 225 (12.6 cases per 1000 EGDs) patients who presented with uninvestigated dyspepsia, 135 men and 90 women. Thirty-one (13.7%) and 17 (7.6%) patients were aged less than 45 and 40 years old, respectively. Among these 225 patients with gastric cancer, 114 (50.7%) patients did not have alarm symptoms (simple dyspepsia), whereas 111 (49.3%) had alarm symptoms. About 5.3% (12/225) of gastric cancer cases would have been missed if endoscopy had been omitted in patients without alarm symptoms and aged less than 45 years. The cumulative age relative frequencies of patients with gastric cancer who presented with simple dyspepsia were 1.8 (12/6720), 1.02 (5/4920), and 0.59 (2/3411) cases per 1000 EGDs for uninvestigated dyspepsia in patients aged less than 45, 40, and 35 years, respectively. When the frequencies of gastric cancer were stratified by age and gender, we found a trend of male predominance in older patients but not in younger patients. The cutoff age was 60 years old ( p < 0.05). Early gastric cancer was detected in 9.9% (11/111) and 26.3% (30/114) of patients with and without alarm symptoms, respectively (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Gastric cancer is not uncommon in patients with dyspepsia aged less than 45 years in Taiwan. The age threshold of screening endoscopy for uninvestigated dyspepsia should be the same for both genders in view of comparable frequencies of gastric cancer in a young age population. Because more than 5% of gastric cancer cases would be missed in Taiwan if endoscopy was omitted in simple dyspeptic patients who were aged less than 45 years, we recommend that 40 years old might be an optimal age threshold for screening endoscopy for uninvestigated dyspepsia in Taiwan, in both men and women patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Drinking before endoscopy: milk or water?

BACKGROUND: The traditional fluid fast prior to endoscopy is unnecessary. We have previously shown that drinking water prior to endoscopy does not affect either the quality of mucosal views or residual gastric fluid volumes when compared to patients undergoing endoscopy after a standard fast. The present study was designed to establish whether milk, which may delay gastric emptying, could also be drunk prior to endoscopy without adverse effect. METHODS: Forty-eight patients (mean age 48 years, range 20 to 79) undergoing routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy after overnight fast were randomized to drink 200 ml of either still mineral water or full fat milk. Endoscopy was performed 90 minutes later, when all residual gastric fluid was aspirated via the endoscope. Volume and pH of gastric aspirate were measured and the quality of the mucosal view at endoscopy recorded as poor, adequate, or excellent. RESULTS: No difference was shown between water (n = 27) and milk (n = 21) drinkers in residual gastric volume (mean +/- SEM, water vs milk) (16.0 ml +/- 1.5 vs 18.9 ml +/- 2.9) or pH (2.23 +/- 0.14 vs 2.48 +/- 0.14). Of those patients with poor, adequate, or excellent views, 4 of 4, 11 of 12, and 6 of 32 patients, respectively, were milk drinkers (chi-squared test for trend = 21.7, df = 1, p < 0.001), indicating significantly worse mucosal views in the group drinking milk. CONCLUSION: Drinking water up to 90 minutes prior to endoscopy is safe, but milk should be discouraged because of suboptimal mucosal views.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Diagnostic yield and cost-effectiveness of endoscopy in chronic human immunodeficiency virus-related diarrhea.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopy is commonly performed in patients with chronic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related diarrhea after negative stool studies. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic yield and cost-effectiveness of endoscopy in this setting. METHODS: Consecutive HIV-infected patients with chronic unexplained diarrhea who were referred for diagnostic endoscopy were identified. Patient charts, pathology reports, and endoscopy records were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 479 endoscopic procedures were performed in 307 patients. A pathogen was identified in 147 patients (47.9%); cytomegalovirus was the most frequent organism found (21.5%). The average cost of identifying a pathogen by endoscopy was $3822.94. Colonoscopy had a greater diagnostic yield than flexible sigmoidoscopy (38.7% vs. 22.4%, p = 0.009) and was more cost-effective. The yield of upper endoscopy was 29.6%. In patients with a CD4 count of less than 100/mm3, endoscopy had a higher diagnostic yield (62.8% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.0001) and a lower cost of identifying a pathogen ($2943.92 vs. $21,583.51) than in those with higher CD4 counts. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopy frequently identifies a pathogen in HIV-related chronic diarrhea. Colonoscopy is the most cost-effective procedure. Endoscopic evaluation has a significantly higher diagnostic yield and is considerably more cost-effective in patients with a CD4 count of less than 100/mm3 than in those with higher CD4 counts.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed1999

Risks of endoscopy in hospitalized pediatric patients with collagen vascular diseases.

BACKGROUND: The gastrointestinal manifestations of the collagen vascular diseases have been well described in the pediatric population. These patients frequently have symptoms that constitute indications for endoscopy. However, the risks and benefits of endoscopy in this population have not been examined. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with collagen vascular diseases hospitalized during a 7-year period was undertaken, and those patients who underwent endoscopy were identified. RESULTS: Nine patients (5%) underwent endoscopic procedures (eight upper and three lower endoscopy). Complications and outcomes were analyzed. Indications for endoscopy included abdominal pain, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, and/or vomiting and diarrhea. Two patients had complications that required surgery within 1 day of the endoscopic procedure. One of these patients subsequently died with GI bleeding. Five of the nine patients had changes in their management after endoscopy. Helicobacter pylori infection was identified and treated in two patients. Three patients had esophagitis or gastritis and acid suppression treatment was started or optimized. Vasculopathy was present in the patients who had complications. CONCLUSIONS: This series suggests that endoscopy can provide useful information for the management of the pediatric patient with GI symptoms and collagen vascular diseases. However, because serious and potentially life-threatening complications can occur, great care is needed in evaluating the risk/benefit ratio of endoscopy in these patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract as a diagnostic tool for children with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of upper gastrointestinal tract lesions in children with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection who undergo endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract and to identify important clinical predictors of abnormal endoscopic results. METHODS: All HIV-infected children who underwent endoscopy and were followed at Children's Hospital, Boston, from January 1985 to August 1994 were studied. The main outcome measure was endoscopic results, which were categorized into observational, histologic, and microbiologic findings. Potential predictors included height, weight, nutritional interventions, HIV disease stage, CD4 T-lymphocyte count, medications, active infections, and indications for endoscopy. RESULTS: Forty-three endoscopies in unique patients are reported. Most children had advanced HIV infection (67% acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, mean CD4 T-lymphocyte count z score = -2.71, weight z score = -2.04). An abnormal endoscopic finding was discovered in 93% of children and confirmed by histologic, microbiologic, or a combination of these studies in 72% of children. Thirty-five percent of children had an opportunistic pathogen identified endoscopically; 65% of these pathogens were previously undiagnosed. Observational findings often were poor indicators of histologic and microbiologic abnormalities. Independent predictors of abnormal histologic findings include younger age at endoscopy (odds ratio (OR) = 1.16 per year, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.02, 1.33)) and guaiac-negative stools (OR = 16.7, 95% CI (1.92, 142.9)). Independent predictors of finding a pathogen at the time of endoscopy include a greater number of indications for endoscopy (OR = 2.6 per indication, 95% CI (1.3, 5.3)) and diagnosis of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (OR = 16.4, 95% CI (1.3, 213)). No other gastrointestinal, nutritional, or immunologic parameters were significantly predictive of endoscopic outcomes. Medical management was changed in 70% of children because of the endoscopic findings. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopy is a useful tool to direct therapy against peptic and infectious disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract in children with HIV infection. Specific gastrointestinal symptoms are not useful predictors of abnormal results.

Bacterial Infections↗
PubMed1994

Empirical H2-blocker therapy or prompt endoscopy in management of dyspepsia.

The recommended strategy for management of dyspepsia is empirical treatment with an H2-blocking drug, followed by endoscopy if the symptoms do not respond or recur. We compared two strategies for the management of dyspepsia--treatment based on the results of prompt endoscopy (group 1) and empirical H2-blocker treatment with diagnostic endoscopy only in cases of therapeutic failure or symptomatic relapse within 1 year (group 2). Eligible patients had symptoms severe enough to justify empirical H2-blocker therapy. Symptoms, drug consumption, and sick-leave days were assessed through monthly diaries. Patients with non-organic dyspepsia diagnosed by endoscopy did not receive ulcer drugs. Of 414 patients randomised, 373 completed 1-year follow-up. Organic disease was found at endoscopy in 68 (33%) of 208 group-1 patients (ulcer in 45). Endoscopy was done in 136 (66%) of 206 group-2 patients. Case selection for endoscopy was not improved by the empirical treatment strategy, since the diagnostic profile was the same as in group 1 and 40% of the expected ulcer cases remained undiagnosed. After 1 year there were no differences in symptoms or quality of life measures. The empirical treatment strategy in dyspepsia was associated with higher costs, due mainly to a higher number of sick-leave days and cost of ulcer drug use. Prompt endoscopy is a cost-effective strategy in dyspeptic patients with symptoms severe enough to justify the current practice of empirical H2-blocker treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Comparison of endoscopy and radiographic fluoroscopy in the evaluation of pediatric congenital airway abnormalities.

In order to assess the accuracy of conventional dynamic radiographic studies compared to endoscopy in the diagnosis of congenital airway abnormalities, we performed a retrospective chart review for the period between July 1991 to June 1996. A total of 186 patients were identified who required hospitalization for their respiratory status as a result of a congenital airway abnormality. Of these, 19% had both endoscopy and conventional dynamic radiographic evaluation (airway fluoroscopy, barium esophagography, or both). Eleven percent had fluoroscopy only, 62% had endoscopy only, and 9% had neither. In those patients who underwent both endoscopic and conventional dynamic radiographic evaluation, endoscopy was considered to be the definitive procedure for diagnosis. Laryngomalacia was present in 94% of these patients. Thirteen patients had multiple sites of airway abnormalities on endoscopy, and a total of 51 abnormalities were identified. Dynamic radiographic evaluation was correct in four, was suggestive of the abnormality in 12, did not recognize an abnormality in 33, and suggested a different diagnosis (not corresponding to endoscopy) in two. Thus, airway fluoroscopy and/or barium esophagography were correct or suggestive in 16 of 51 abnormalities (31%). We conclude that endoscopy is required in the majority of hospitalized patients for the precise diagnosis of a congenital airway abnormality. Conventional dynamic radiographic studies are helpful to confirm a suspected diagnosis in patients with a strong clinical history and physical examination. When the diagnosis is not clear based on the patient presentation, endoscopy is more definitive than conventional dynamic radiography in identifying pediatric congenital airway abnormalities.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMed1999

The use of maxillary sinus endoscopy in the diagnosis of orbital floor fractures.

PURPOSE: The goal of the current study was to evaluate the ability to diagnose the presence of an inferior orbital wall fracture through the use of a transantral endoscopy technique at bedside. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven trauma patients with initial axial computed tomography (CT) scan findings consistent with an orbital floor fracture were studied. Before endoscopy, the patients underwent a coronal CT scan with 3-mm cuts for later comparison with the endoscopic findings. The surgeon performing the endoscopy procedure was blinded to the results of the coronal CT scan. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and measurement for enophthalmos were performed before endoscopy. The endoscopic procedure was performed at the bedside using local anesthesia. A trocar was used in the canine fossa to gain access to the maxillary sinus. A 30 degrees and then a 70 degrees endoscope were introduced through the trocar to evaluate the integrity of the orbital floor (ie, maxillary sinus roof). The degree of mucosal injury of the orbital floor and the presence of blood or orbital contents in the sinus were recorded. The ophthalmologic examination was repeated after completion of endoscopy. RESULTS: The endoscopic procedure was able to be completed in all patients. There was no change in the ophthalmologic examination in any patient as a result of endoscopy. In six of the seven patients studied, the endoscopic findings correlated with the need for surgical intervention to repair the orbital floor predicted on the basis of coronal CT scan. This was determined by the degree of injury to the orbital floor and the presence of hematoma, exposed bone, or fat. In the remaining case, endoscopy was not diagnostic for the presence of a fracture because only ecchymosis of the orbital floor was noted. CONCLUSIONS: The ability to perform endoscopy under local anesthesia at the bedside is useful in those trauma patients whose concomitant injuries may prohibit other diagnostic modalities.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

[Nasal endoscopy associated with paranasal sinus computerized tomography scan in the diagnosis of chronic nasal obstruction].

UNLABELLED: The chronic nasal obstruction is a common complaint in Otolaryngology outpatients. The diagnosis of nasal obstruction is based on the clinical history, physical examination and diagnostic procedures. Among these, it is already established in the current literature the importance of nasal endoscopy and computer tomography scan. AIM: The objective of this research study was based on a comparative study among findings of nasal endoscopy and CT scan of the paranasal sinuses, within the examinations for etiological investigation in chronic nasal obstruction, individualizing the importance of each exam for a conclusive diagnosis. STUDY DESIGN: Historic cohort. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Twenty patients with chronic nasal obstruction complaints were studied, aged between 14 and 51 years old in the Otolaryngology outpatient unit at Nossa Senhora de Lourdes Hospital, Sao Paulo. It is a retrospective clinical study, carried out by revision of medical charts of assisted patients from 2002 to 2004. RESULTS: All the patients presented complaints of chronic nasal obstruction. In the 20 patients, 10 (50%) presented associated allergic complaints. In 16 out of 20 (80%), patients presented hypertrophic concha evidenced by nasal endoscopy; in only 9 out of 20 (45%) patients we found the same affection as in the CT scan. Based on the presented results, the finding of hypertrophic concha was more evidenced in nasal endoscopy compared to CT (80% X 45%). Two cases of nasal polyposis were evidenced in nasal endoscopy but not in CT, besides two other cases without detection in the CT, but detected by nasal endoscopy, in other words, normal CT with abnormal nasal endoscopy. CONCLUSION: Thus, the presented study and the results of nasal fossa findings obtained by nasal endoscopy were more conclusive in the elucidation of diagnosis than those obtained by computer tomography of the paranasal sinus.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Initial endoscopy or empirical therapy with or without testing for Helicobacter pylori for dyspepsia: a decision analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Empirical therapy has been proposed for initial management of dyspepsia. The aim of this study was to evaluate initial endoscopy, empirical therapy, and testing for Helicobacter pylori in the management of patients with a new onset of dyspepsia. METHODS: Decision analysis was used to compare the direct medical charges in the first year after the onset of dyspepsia for patients managed by initial endoscopy or empirical therapy, with or without initial testing for H. pylori. RESULTS: Medical care charges were $2162.50 for initial endoscopy and $2122.60 for empirical therapy, a difference of 1.8%. For a 55-year-old adult, life expectancy was 23.49 years for initial endoscopy compared with 23.48 years for empirical therapy. Empirical therapy has lower charges than initial endoscopy when H2-receptor antagonists are used to prevent recurrence of dyspepsia. Initial noninvasive testing for H. pylori has lower charges than initial endoscopy if patients with dyspepsia with H. pylori receive antimicrobial therapy without endoscopy but would have higher charges if patients with H. pylori routinely have endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Surprisingly, the choice of optimal management strategy was a "toss-up." Only modest savings may result from practice guidelines that recommend empirical therapy in the management of patients with dyspepsia.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Wireless capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy for the diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

Standard endoscopic examination (upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy) fails to detect the cause of gastrointestinal hemorrhage in approximately 5% of patients. Before the availability of wireless capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy, imaging modalities for the small intestine distal to the ligament of Treitz included barium contrast examination and/or enteroclysis, push, passive, or intraoperative enteroscopy, technetium 99m labeled sulfur colloid scanning, angiography, and computed tomography, although the diagnostic yield of all of these imaging modalities was low. In 2001, wireless capsule endoscopy became available for the evaluation of patients with probable small intestinal hemorrhage. Advantages of wireless capsule endoscopy include that the procedure is noninvasive, requires no sedation, and does not expose the patient to ionizing radiation. In patients with obscure gastrointestinal hemorrhage, studies have demonstrated an additional 25 to 50% diagnostic yield using wireless capsule endoscopy when compared to other diagnostic modalities. The major limitations of capsule endoscopy were its inability to obtain a biopsy, precisely localize a lesion, or perform therapeutic endoscopy. In 2001, the double-balloon enteroscope was introduced. This new endoscopic technique provides the gastroenterologist with an opportunity for further evaluation and treatment of abnormalities detected on wireless capsule endoscopy or other small intestinal imaging studies.

Capsules↗
PubMed2002

A score card for upper GI endoscopy: Evaluation of interobserver variability in examiners with various levels of experience.

BACKGROUND: In most European countries, training in GI endoscopy has largely been based on hands-on acquisition of experience in patients rather than on a structured training programme. With the development of training models systematic hands-on training in a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy techniques was achieved. Little, however, is known about methods of objectively assessing trainees' performance. We therefore developed an assessment 'score card' for upper GI endoscopy and tested it in endoscopists with various levels of experience. The aim of the study was therefore to assess interobserver variations in the evaluation of trainees. METHODS: On the basis of textbook and expert opinions a consensus group of eight experienced endoscopists developed a score card for diagnostic upper GI endoscopy with biopsy. The score card includes an assessment of the single steps of the procedure as well as of the times needed to complete each step. This score card was then evaluated in a further conference including ten experts who blindly assessed videotapes of 15 endoscopists performing upper GI endoscopy in a training bio-simulation model (the 'Erlangen Endo-Trainer'). On the basis of their previous experience (i. e. the number of endoscopies performed) these 15 endoscopists were classified into four groups: very experienced, experienced, having some experience and inexperienced. Interobserver variability (IOV) was tested for the various score card parameters (Kendall's rank-correlation coefficient 0.0-0.5 poor, 0.5-1.0 good agreement). In addition, the correlation between the score card assessment and the examiners' experience levels was analysed. RESULTS: Despite poor IOV results for all the parameters tested (Kendall coefficient < 0.3), the assessment parameters correlated well when the examiners' different experience levels were taken into account (correlation coefficient 0.59-0.89, p < 0.05). The score card parameters were suitable for differentiating between the four groups of examiners with different levels of endoscopic experience. CONCLUSIONS: As expected with scores involving subjective assessment of performance, the variability between reviewers was substantial. Nevertheless, the assessment score was capable of distinguishing reliably between different experience levels in terms of a good individual observer consistency. The score card can therefore be used to document both training status and progress during endoscopy training courses using bio-simulation models, and this might be able to provide improved quality assurance in GI endoscopy training.

Animals↗