Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Capsule Endoscopy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources

The use of wireless capsule endoscopy in clinical diagnostic gastroenterology.

This profile describes a new wireless video endoscopy device designed to image previously inaccessible areas of the gastrointestinal tract with unprecedented precision and clarity. This PillCam technology involves a disposable, ingestible camera that transmits more than 50,000 digital images of the small bowel to personal computer software. The wireless capsule endoscopy technology supplements and is rapidly replacing standard small bowel imaging techniques, and its use has revolutionized conventional ideas about the small bowel's role in many conditions such as Crohn's disease and occult blood loss. In addition to the small bowel device, an esophageal adaptation was released in January 2005. This capsule technology anticipates exponential growth in both diagnostic and possible therapeutic dimensions in the future.

Coated Materials, Biocompatible↗

Video capsule endoscopy to prospectively assess small bowel injury with celecoxib, naproxen plus omeprazole, and placebo.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Data indicate that cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitors cause less gastroduodenal mucosal damage than nonspecific NSAIDS, but their effects on the small bowel mucosa are less well recognized. In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with video capsule endoscopy (VCE) we prospectively evaluated the incidence of small bowel injury in healthy subjects treated with celecoxib compared to naproxen plus omeprazole. METHODS: We randomly assigned subjects with normal baseline VCEs to celecoxib 200 mg twice daily (n = 120), naproxen 500 mg twice daily plus omeprazole 20 mg once daily (n = 118), or placebo (n = 118) for 2 weeks. The primary end point was the mean number of small bowel mucosal breaks per subject. RESULTS: Baseline VCE found small bowel lesions in 13.8% (57/413) of screened subjects, who became ineligible for randomization. The mean number of small bowel mucosal breaks per subject and the percentage of subjects with these mucosal breaks were 2.99 +/- 0.51, 55% for naproxen/omeprazole compared to 0.32 +/- 0.10, 16% for celecoxib and 0.11 +/- 0.04, 7% for placebo (P < .001, both comparisons). The magnitude of the difference between celecoxib and placebo was small but statistically significant (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Among healthy subjects with lesion-free baseline VCEs, celecoxib was associated with significantly fewer small bowel mucosal breaks than naproxen plus omeprazole. This study also showed that the background incidence of small bowel lesions in healthy adults is not insignificant and should be considered in future trials with VCE.

Adolescent↗

The first prospective controlled trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in chronic gastrointestinal bleeding.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: In chronic gastrointestinal bleeding (CGB), bleeding sites located in the small bowel are difficult to detect with conventional radiological or scintigraphic techniques. Push enteroscopy (PE) is at present considered to be the most effective diagnostic procedure. The aim of this prospective trial was to compare the efficacy of wireless capsule endoscopy (CE) with PE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April and October 2001, 65 patients with CGB were referred to our unit. Complete conventional diagnostic work-up (including small-bowel enteroclysis, angiography, and scintigraphy), as well as PE and CE, were performed in 32 patients. RESULTS: On average, the patients had been suffering from CGB for 29 +/- 24 months (6 - 126); the lowest hemoglobin level varied between 3.0 and 9.9 g/dl (mean 5.9 +/- 1.4); 17 +/- 18 blood units (0 - 60) were transfused. Each patient underwent 6 +/- 7 (range 1 - 38) hospitalizations, with a mean of 14 +/- 9 diagnostic procedures before CE was used. Conventional diagnostic procedures revealed relevant pathological findings in five of the 32 patients (16 %). Definite bleeding sites diagnosed by PE in nine patients (28 %) included angiodysplasia (seven patients), small-bowel cancer (one patient) and lymphoma (one patient). CE detected the definite source in 21 of the 32 patients (66 %) ( P < 0.001). Definite bleeding sources included angiodysplasia (17 patients), malignant stenoses (two patients) and inflammatory small-bowel disease (two patients). Questionable bleeding sources were seen on PE in three additional patients (9 %), and using CE in a further seven patients (22 %). Both CE and PE were safe and were not associated with any morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: In the present trial in patients with CGB, wireless CE had the highest diagnostic yield and was significantly superior to PE. CE can help reduce the number of diagnostic procedures and could become the initial diagnostic choice in patients with CGB and negative upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Adult↗

Impact of Small Bowel Exploration Using Video-Capsule Endoscopy in the Management of Acute Gastrointestinal Graft-versus-Host Disease.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the global diagnostic approach on the outcome of patients suspected of having acute (a) gastrointestinal (GI) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). METHODS: Ten consecutive patients with suspected aGI-GVHD were prospectively explored with an exhaustive approach including video-capsule endoscopy (VCE). Images observed with VCE were compared with results obtained with other GI investigations including duodenal biopsies. RESULTS.: Five patients had a normal VCE examination: four were successfully treated symptomatically, but one died as a result of toxoplasmosis. VCE disclosed aGI-GVHD lesions in all five remaining patients, and two of the five were considered normal by upper GI endoscopy. All of these patients experienced improvement in their GI symptoms within 2 weeks of adjustments to their immunosuppressive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This approach has enhanced the authors' ability to adapt immunosuppressive treatments in patients suffering from suspected aGI-GVHD. Further investigation of the apparently high negative predictive value of VCE will be of great interest, particularly with a view to avoiding unnecessary immunosuppressive treatment.

Acute Disease↗

Mucosal abnormalities of the small bowel in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension: a capsule endoscopy study.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of small-bowel mucosal changes in patients with portal hypertension is not known. The objective of the study is to better define the mucosal abnormalities of portal hypertensive enteropathy (PHE) and to determine whether these findings are associated with the severity of liver disease, esophageal varices, portal gastropathy, portal colonopathy, or other clinical characteristics. METHODS: We compared the medical records of 37 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension with 34 control patients who underwent capsule endoscopy over a 3-year period. RESULTS: Mucosal changes were found to be significantly more common in the cirrhotic patients than in the control patients (67.5% vs. 0, p < 0.001). The lesions included telangiectasias or angiodysplastic-like lesions in 9 (24.3%) patients, red spots in 23 (62.2%), and varices in 3 (8.1%). Active bleeding was seen during endoscopic examinations in 4 (10.8%) patients. A comparison of patients with and those without PHE showed that grade 2+ or larger esophageal varices, portal gastropathy, portal colonopathy, and Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis were all significantly associated with PHE. There were no differences between these two groups of patients with regard to the etiology of cirrhosis, gender, or history of esophageal variceal bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Mucosal abnormalities in portal jejunopathy include edema, erythema, and vascular lesions findings. A standardized grading system to classify the endoscopic appearance and the severity of portal enteropathy is proposed. The clinical import of these changes remains to be explained.

Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal↗

Video capsule endoscopy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The small bowel has been a difficult organ for gastroenterologists to evaluate. Small bowel radiographs and CT scanning have not had a high diagnostic rate, especially in patients presenting with small bowel bleeding. The video capsule "endoscope" has allowed for the direct visualization of the small bowel mucosa. This new technique provides direct viewing of the entire small bowel much like conventional endoscopy. RECENT FINDINGS: A series of studies have shown that video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is superior to barium radiography studies, CT scanning, and push enteroscopy for diagnosing disorders of the small bowel. Numerous case reports of angioectasias, Crohn disease, small bowel tumors, and other small bowel disorders have been reported. A recent study proposes that VCE helped to direct therapy and had a great impact in patient care. SUMMARY: Capsule endoscopy provides higher rates and more accurate diagnosis of small bowel diseases. The future of this technology could improve the ability to visualize the small bowel and improve the treatment of patients with small bowel disorders.

Journal Article↗

Wireless capsule endoscopy: from diagnostic devices to multipurpose robotic systems.

In the recent past, the introduction of miniaturised image sensors with low power consumption, based on complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology, has allowed the realisation of an ingestible wireless capsule for the visualisation of the small intestine mucosa. The device has received approval from Food and Drug Administration and has gained momentum since it has been more successful than traditional techniques in the diagnosis of small intestine disorders. In 2004 an esophagus specific capsule was launched, while a solution for colon is still under development. However, present solutions suffer from several limitations: they move passively by exploiting peristalsis, are not able to stop intentionally for a prolonged diagnosis, they receive power from an internal battery with short length, and their usage is restricted to one organ, either small bowel or esophagus. However the steady progresses in many branches of engineering, including microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), are envisaged to affect the performances of capsular endoscopy. The near future foreshadows capsules able to pass actively through the whole gastrointestinal tract, to retrieve views from all organs and to perform drug delivery and tissue sampling. In the long term, the advent of robotics could lead to autonomous medical platforms, equipped with the most advanced solutions in terms of MEMS for therapy and diagnosis of the digestive tract. In this review, we discuss the state of the art of wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE): after a description on the current status, we present the most promising solutions.

Capsule Endoscopes↗