PubMed1994
Biological dosimeters measure biologically relevant effects of radiation exposure that are in some sense an estimate of effective dose, whereas biophysical indicators serve as surrogates of absorbed dose in a manner analogous to conventional thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). The biological and biophysical dosimeters have the potential to play an important role in assessing unanticipated or occupational radiation exposures. For example, where the exposure is large and uncertain (i.e. radiation accidents), accurate dose information can help in deciding the most appropriate therapy and medical treatment. Another useful area is that of lifetime accumulated dose determination, and the ability to distinguish between and integrate the exposures from natural and anthropogenic (medical X-rays, indoor radon, natural background radiation, occupational and non-occupational exposures). Also, the possibility to monitor individual response and differences in inherent or induced radiation sensitivity may have important implications for radiation protection. More commonly, this type of dosimetry could be used for routine monitoring to detect and quantify unsuspected exposure, for regulatory purposes or for epidemiological studies of the long-term effects of radiation exposure (e.g. in Japanese A-bomb survivors or in the population surrounding Chernobyl). This review is a comparative study of the existing techniques and their future prospects. It summarizes the sensitivity, reproducibility, limiting dose, dose-rate, energy, LET response, sources of variability and uncertainty, and other practical aspects of each bio-indicator. The strengths and weaknesses of each approach are evaluated on the basis of common criteria for particular applications, and are summarized for each assay both in the text and in tabular form, for convenience. It is clear that no single indicator qualifies to reliably measure occupational exposures at the current levels of sensitivity conventional dosimetry services provide. Most of the bio-techniques are applicable to the detection of relatively high radiation exposures at relatively short times after exposure. Some of the bio-indicators have been identified that are, or offer future prospects for becoming, appropriate bio-indicators for dosimetry needs. However, all methods are subject to biological and other variables that are presently uncontrolled, and represent a major source of uncertainty. These include variations in background signals not directly associated with radiation exposure, inter- and intra-individual variability of radiation response, and genetic and environmental effects. Although these factors contribute to the lack of confidence in biological dosimetry, promising bio-indicators may be applied to large populations to establish the inherent variability and confounding factors that limit quantitative data collection and analysis, and reduce reliability and reproducibility.