Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “BREAST”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Benign breast disease, recent alcohol consumption, and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: Alcohol consumption is a well-established risk factor for breast cancer. Some studies have suggested that the risk of breast cancer associated with alcohol consumption is greater for women with a history of benign breast disease (BBD). We hypothesized that among women with biopsy-confirmed BBD, recent alcohol consumption would increase the risk of breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease to a greater extent than in women with nonproliferative breast disease. METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study in the Nurses' Health Study I and II. The cases (n = 282) were women diagnosed with incident breast cancer, with a prior biopsy-confirmed breast disease. The controls (n = 1,223) were participants with a previous BBD biopsy, but without a diagnosis of breast cancer. Pathologists reviewed benign breast biopsy slides in a blinded fashion and classified the BBD as nonproliferative, proliferative without atypia, or atypical hyperplasia, according to standard criteria. RESULTS: Women with nonproliferative breast disease consuming > or = 15 g of alcohol per day had a nonsignificant 67% increased risk of breast cancer (odds ratio = 1.67; 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 4.34) compared with nondrinkers. There was no evidence that recent alcohol consumption increased the risk of breast cancer to a greater extent in women with proliferative BBD than among women with nonproliferative BBD (P for interactio n = 0.20). CONCLUSION: Contrary to our a priori hypothesis, there was no evidence that recent alcohol consumption increased the risk of breast cancer to a greater extent among women with proliferative BBD than among women with nonproliferative BBD.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

HER-2/neu amplification in benign breast disease and the risk of subsequent breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the presence of HER-2/neu gene amplification and/or overexpression in benign breast disease was associated with an increased risk of subsequent breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study of a cohort of women who were diagnosed with benign breast disease at the Mayo Clinic and who were subsequently observed for the development of breast cancer. Patients who developed breast cancer formed the case group, and a matched sample from the remaining cohort served as controls. Benign tissue samples from 137 cases and 156 controls and malignant tissues from 99 cases provided DNA or tissue for evaluation of HER-2/neu amplification and protein overexpression. RESULTS: Among the controls, seven benign tissues (4.5%) demonstrated low-level HER-2/neu amplification, whereas 13 benign (9.5%) and 18 malignant (18%) tissue specimens from cases exhibited amplification. HER-2/neu amplification in benign breast biopsies was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (odds ratio ¿OR = 2.2; 95% confidence interval ¿CI, 0.9 to 5.8); this association approached statistical significance. The risks for breast cancer associated with benign breast histopathologic diagnoses were OR = 1.1 (95% CI, 0.6 to 1.9) for lesions exhibiting proliferation without atypia and OR = 1.5 (95% CI, 0.4 to 5.6) for the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia. For women having both HER-2/neu amplification and a proliferative histopathologic diagnosis (either typical or atypical), the risk of breast cancer was more than seven-fold (OR = 7.2; 95% CI, 0.9 to 60.8). Overexpression of the HER-2/neu protein product, defined as membrane staining in 10% or more of epithelial cells, was found in 30% of the breast tumors but was not detected in any of the benign breast tissues. Case patients who had HER-2/neu gene amplification in their malignant tumor were more likely to have had HER-2/neu amplification in their prior benign biopsy (P =.06, Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSION: Women with benign breast biopsies demonstrating both HER-2/neu amplification and a proliferative histopathologic diagnosis may be at substantially increased risk for subsequent breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The nuclear oxysterol receptor LXRalpha is expressed in the normal human breast and in breast cancer.

The liver X> or = receptor alpha (LXRalpha) is a nuclear receptor with a key role in bile acid biosynthesis and cholesterol metabolism. The present study investigated the expression and function of LXRalpha in the normal and malignant human breast. LXRalpha mRNA transcripts were detected by RT-PCR in nine breast carcinoma cell lines. The nucleotide sequence of the cloned PCR product was identical to the corresponding human LXRalpha cDNA sequence. Expression of LXRalpha protein was confirmed by immunoblot analysis of breast cancer cell lysates. LXRalpha mRNA was expressed in 14/15 (93%) of normal human breast mammoplasty specimens and in 11/15 (73%) of primary breast carcinomas. Oxysterol and nonsteroidal LXRalpha agonists at low micromolar concentrations inhibited proliferation of breast carcinoma cell lines in culture. The importance of LXRalpha signaling in cholesterol homeostasis and the observed expression of LXRalpha in normal breast tissue suggest that this nuclear oxysterol receptor has an important physiological function in the breast. LXRalpha gene expression is regulated by dietary fatty acids implicated in breast carcinogenesis and detection of LXRalpha expression in breast cancer cell lines and breast tumors in the present study indicates that LXRalpha may also be important in breast carcinogenesis. Inhibition of breast cancer cell proliferation suggests that pharmacological LXRalpha agonists may have potential preventive and/or therapeutic antitumor activity in breast cancer.

Breast↗
PubMedDate not supplied

17 beta-estradiol-regulated expression of protein tyrosine phosphatase gamma gene in cultured human normal breast and breast cancer cells.

BACKGROUND: Protein tyrosine phosphatase gamma (PTP gamma) has been implicated as a potential tumor suppressor gene in kidney and lung adenocarcinomas. We have previously shown that PTP gamma mRNA expression levels are lower in DES-induced kidney tumors than in normal kidneys of Syrian hamsters. The goals of the present study were to determine if PTP gamma mRNA is present in both normal and cancerous human breast cells, and to investigate the estrogenic regulation of PTP gamma mRNA expression in these cell types. METHODS: Primary cultured human breast cells derived from surgical specimens of mammoplasty and breast cancer patients, as well as human breast cancer cell lines were used for the study. RT-PCR and RNase protection assay was utilized to detect and quantify levels of PTP gamma mRNA among the cell types used and between control and 17 beta-estradiol (E2)-treated cells. Transient transfection of human estrogen receptor (ER) into MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells was performed to establish the role of ER in the regulation of PTP gamma mRNA expression. RESULTS: The results show that PTP gamma mRNA is expressed in primary cultured human breast cells isolated from mammoplasty and breast cancer patients, as well as in human cancer cell lines, and that E2 significantly inhibits PTP gamma expression in ER-positive human breast cancer cells via an ER-mediated mechanism. We show that PTP gamma mRNA levels are lower in human breast cancer cells than in normal human breast cells. Furthermore, we report that PTP gamma mRNA expression is inhibited by E2 in a dose-dependent manner in primary cultured breast cells. After treatment with 20 nM E2 for 24 hours, PTP gamma mRNA was significantly suppressed in primary cultured cancerous and non-cancerous cells from breast cancer patients, as well as in the ER-positive MCF-7 cell line by 50%, 85%, and 66%, respectively. In contrast, the PTP gamma mRNA expression levels did not change in similarly treated ER-negative MDA-MB-231 cells. Sensitivity to E2-induced suppression could be restored (94% inhibition) by transfecting MDA-MB-231 cells with an ER expression plasmid. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are the first to suggest that PTP gamma is a potential estrogen-regulated tumor suppressor gene in human breast cancer which may play an important role in neoplastic processes of human breast epithelium.

Breast↗
PubMed2002

Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 14. The role of hormone replacement therapy in women with a previous diagnosis of breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To provide information and recommendations to women with a previous diagnosis of breast cancer and their physicians regarding hormone replacement therapy (HRT). OUTCOMES: Control of menopausal symptoms, quality of life, prevention of osteoporosis, prevention of cardiovascular disease, risk of recurrence of breast cancer, risk of death from breast cancer. EVIDENCE: Systematic review of English-language literature published from January 1990 to July 2001 retrieved from MEDLINE and CANCERLIT. RECOMMENDATIONS: * Routine use of HRT (either estrogen alone or estrogen plus progesterone) is not recommended for women who have had breast cancer. Randomized controlled trials are required to guide recommendations for this group of women. Women who have had breast cancer are at risk of recurrence and contralateral breast cancer. The potential effect of HRT on these outcomes in women with breast cancer has not been determined in methodologically sound studies. However, in animal and in vitro studies, the development and growth of breast cancer is known to be estrogen dependent. Given the demonstrated increased risk of breast cancer associated with HRT in women without a diagnosis of breast cancer, it is possible that the risk of recurrence and contralateral breast cancer associated with HRT in women with breast cancer could be of a similar magnitude. * Postmenopausal women with a previous diagnosis of breast cancer who request HRT should be encouraged to consider alternatives to HRT. If menopausal symptoms are particularly troublesome and do not respond to alternative approaches, a well-informed woman may choose to use HRT to control these symptoms after discussing the risks with her physician. In these circumstances, both the dose and the duration of treatment should be minimized. VALIDATION: Internal validation within the Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer; no external validation. SPONSOR: The steering committee was convened by Health Canada. COMPLETION DATE: October 2001.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Risk of breast cancer in women with breast cysts.

OBJECTIVE: To study the occurrence of breast cancer in women with breast cysts. DESIGN: Prospective follow-up study. SETTING: Office surgical practice. PATIENTS: All 742 women referred to the practice with breast cysts diagnosed by means of aspiration or, occasionally, biopsy between 1969 and 1985. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of breast cancer and the number of years between diagnosis of breast cyst and diagnosis of cancer. The observed number of cases of breast cancer was compared with the expected number, calculated from Ontario rates of breast cancer. RESULTS: Fifteen of the women died but did not have breast cancer. No follow-up information was available for five women. Another 38 were lost to follow-up; they did not have breast cancer at the last contact, after 2 to 17 years of follow-up. These patients were withdrawn from the study in the year in which they died or were last observed. By 1990, 34 (5%) of the women had breast cancer. The overall ratio of observed:expected cases of cancer was 3.04 (95% confidence interval 2.09 to 4.28). Breast cancer developed after 7.5 years, but the average length of follow-up was only 10.1 years. Only 3.8% of 374 women after 10 years and 5.4% of 141 women after 15 years had breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Women who have a gross breast cyst are at moderately increased risk of breast cancer, which usually develops only after many years.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of the combination of annual screening with mammography, physical examination of the breasts and the teaching of breast self-examination in reducing the rate of death from breast cancer among women aged 40 to 49 years on entry. DESIGN: Individually randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Fifteen urban centres in Canada with expertise in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. PARTICIPANTS: Women with no history of breast cancer and no mammography in the previous 12 months were randomly assigned to undergo either annual mammography and physical examination (MP group) or usual care after an initial physical examination (UC group). The 50,430 women enrolled from January 1980 through March 1985 were followed for a mean of 8.5 years. DATA COLLECTION: Derived from the participants by initial and annual self-administered questionnaires, from the screening examinations, from the patients' physicians, from the provincial cancer registries and by record linkage to the Canadian National Mortality Data Base. Expert panels evaluated histologic and death data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of referral from screening, rates of detection of breast cancer from screening and from community care, nodal status, tumour size, and rates of death from all causes and from breast cancer. RESULTS: Over 90% of the women in each group attended the screening sessions or returned the annual questionnaires, or both, over years 2 to 5. The characteristics of the women in the two groups were similar. Compared with the Canadian population, the participants were more likely to be married, have fewer children, have more education, be in a professional occupation, smoke less and have been born in North America. The rate of screen-detected breast cancer on first examination was 3.89 per 1000 in the MP group and 2.46 per 1000 in the UC group; more node-positive tumours were found in the MP group than in the UC group. During years 2 through 5 the ratios of observed to expected cases of invasive breast cancer were 1.26 in the MP group and 1.02 in the UC group. Of the women with invasive breast cancer through to 7 years, 191 and 157 women in the MP and UC groups respectively had no node involvement, 55 and 43 had one to three nodes involved, 47 and 23 had four or more nodes involved, and 38 and 49 had an unknown nodal status. There were 38 deaths from breast cancer in the MP group and 28 in the UC group. The ratio of the proportions of death from breast cancer in the MP group compared with those in the UC group was 1.36 (95% confidence interval 0.84 to 2.21). The survival rates were similar in the two groups. The highest survival rate occurred among women whose cancer had been detected by mammography alone. CONCLUSION: The study was internally valid, and there was no evidence of randomization bias. Screening with yearly mammography and physical examination of the breasts detected considerably more node-negative, small tumours than usual care, but it had no impact on the rate of death from breast cancer up to 7 years' follow-up from entry.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

[Breast Center--a virtual unit for the multidisciplinary care of breast patients].

Breast cancer, the most prevalent female malignancy represents a major health problem. Breast cancer mortality may be halved by high quality mammography screening and care. The most efficient screening and the best treatment of patients are available at the breast centers that are equipped with special facilities, expertise and significant experience via the treatment of a high number of patients. Breast center is a virtual unit based on the collaboration of various professionals; a tight institutional frame is not a must. In these comprehensive centers, 150 breast cancer patients per year at a minimum are treated, and the most efficient special treatment methods are available. The core members of the staff are the breast pathologists, the mammographists, the breast surgeons, the oncologists/oncoradiologists, the breast nurses, the technicians and the data managers. An easy access to the service of the non-core members, the plastic surgeons, the psychologists, the psychiatrists and the clinical geneticists is necessary. An optimal collaboration of the various experts may be achieved by a training of the members, regular multidisciplinary meetings and guidelines developed and accepted by all. The requirements of a breast center have been published by the European Society of Mastology (EUSOMA), and a directory of the accredited European breast centers is maintained. The Breast Unit of the University of Szeged has been found eligible by EUSOMA to be included in the directory of the European breast units. Two mammographists do screening-mammography and clinical examination, 2 pathologists perform cytopathological, histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations. Three surgeons operate on more than 250 breast cancer patients per year, and apply wire or isotope (ROLL) localisation in case of non-palpable lesion. A plastic surgeon is available if necessary. In a half of all cases, sentinel mapping is performed with isotope- and blue dye-labelling. Two radiotherapists apply conformal radiotherapy in 250 cases per year, and 2 oncologists perform modern chemotherapies in 200 cases as a yearly average; 50 new advanced/metastatic cases per year require oncological treatments. Breast nurses, a psycho-oncologist and a mental hygienist nurse assist the team. There is access to lymphedema treatment and physiotherapy. The final goal of the program is to provide all women with high quality mammography screening and care, if necessary.

Breast Diseases↗
PubMed1993

Breast cancer risk associated with proliferative breast disease and atypical hyperplasia.

BACKGROUND: Women with proliferative breast disease (PD) have been observed to have an increased risk of breast cancer. The authors evaluated the effect of PD on breast cancer risk in a case-control study among participants of the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project (BCDDP). METHODS: More than 280,000 women were screened in the BCDDP at 29 centers. Study subjects were selected from BCDDP participants who underwent biopsy that revealed benign breast tissue. There were five BCDDP centers for which histologic slides were available on more than 85% of the benign biopsy specimens. Case patients for this study were the 95 women from these five centers who had breast cancer develop during follow-up. Two matched control patients who did not have breast cancer develop were selected for each case. The biopsy slides were reviewed by two pathologists who were blinded with regard to cancer outcome. RESULTS: Women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) had 4.3 times the breast cancer risk of women without PD (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-11). In women with PD lacking AH, the relative risk was 1.3 (95% CI, 0.77-2.2). A family history of breast cancer (FH) increased breast cancer risk 2.4 times (95% CI, 1.4-4.3). The joint occurrence of FH and AH had a strong synergistic effect on breast cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: AH is a reliable marker of increased breast cancer risk among women undergoing breast biopsy.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Immunohistochemical analysis of MUC5B apomucin expression in breast cancer and non-malignant breast tissues.

A deregulation of several MUC genes (MUC1, MUC2, MUC3, MUC5AC, and MUC6) was previously demonstrated in breast carcinomas. Considering that recently we found the "non-mammary" MUC5B mRNA in primary breast tumors (Berois et al. 2003), we undertook the present study to evaluate the expression profile of MUC5B protein product in breast tissues, using LUM5B-2 antisera raised against sequences within the non-glycosylated regions of this apomucin. Expression of MUC5B by breast cancer cells was confirmed by immunocytochemistry, in situ hybridization, and Western blot on MCF-7 cancer cells. Using an immunohistochemical procedure, MUC5B apomucin was detected in 34/42 (81%) primary breast tumors, in 13/14 (92.8%) samples of non-malignant breast diseases, in 8/19 (42.1%) samples of normal-appearing breast epithelia adjacent to cancer, and in 0/5 normal control breast samples. The staining pattern of MUC5B was very different when comparing breast cancer cells (cytoplasmic) and non-malignant breast cells (predominantly apical and in the secretory material). We analyzed MUC5B mRNA expression using RT-PCR in bone marrow aspirates from 22/42 patients with breast cancer to compare with MUC5B protein expression in the primary tumors. Good correlation was observed because the six MUC5B-positive bone marrow samples also displayed MUC5B expression in the tumor. Our results show, for the first time at the protein level, that MUC5B apomucin is upregulated in breast cancer. Its characterization could provide new insights about the glycobiology of breast cancer cells.

Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous↗
PubMed1987

Influence of pregnancy and lactation on serum and breast fluid estrogen levels: implications for breast cancer risk.

We investigated estrogen (estrone and estradiol) levels in serum and in nipple aspirates of breast fluid in relation to reproductive and menopausal characteristics in 104 normal women. In general, breast fluid and serum estrogen levels were not correlated and breast fluid estrogen levels were approximately 5 to 45 times higher than serum levels. Serum estrogen levels were lower in post-menopausal than in pre-menopausal women. In contrast, breast fluid estrogen levels were approximately the same in pre- and post-menopausal women. Breast fluid estrogen mean levels were lower in pre-menopausal parous women than in nulligravidous or nulliparous women whereas serum estrogen levels did not differ in these 3 groups. Breast fluid estrogen levels were positively correlated with months since last birth or since last breast-feeding. Estrogen levels were low in nipple aspirates of breast milk but gradually increased in breast fluid of non-lactating women over a period of several years after cessation of lactation. Serum estrogen levels did not increase with months since last breast-feeding. We were unable to evaluate the post-partum effect of pregnancy without lactation due to the small numbers of these subjects. The high concentrations of estrogen in breast fluid and the absence of a relationship to serum estrogen levels may explain why prior serum studies have failed to link variations in serum estrogens with breast cancer risk. The prolonged low levels of breast fluid estrogens following full-term birth and lactation may, in part, provide a mechanism by which parity reduces breast cancer risk.

Body Fluids↗
PubMed2004

Novel germline mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1, BRCA2 and p53 gene in breast cancer patients from India.

Mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for more than 80% of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. p53 tumor suppressor gene that controls cellular growth and differentiation is also known to be mutated in more than 50% of human cancers including breast cancer. We have carried out a study on BRCA1 and BRCA2 along with p53 gene mutations in both sporadic as well as familial breast cancer patients from India where breast cancer is fast emerging as a major cancer among premenopausal urban women. We examined 124 untreated primary breast cancer patients comprising 100 sporadic and 24 familial cases including 56 age-matched healthy controls for the presence of BRCA1, BRCA2 and the p53 gene mutations using PCR-SSCP and direct nucleotide sequencing. Certain frequently mutated exons such as 2, 5, 11, 13 and 20 of BRCA1, exons 2, 9, 11 (for 6174delT), 18 and 20 of BRCA2 and 4-9 exons of p53 gene were analyzed in sporadic breast cancer while all 22 coding exons of BRCA1 including its flanking intronic regions along with above mentioned exons of BRCA2 and p53 gene were analyzed in familial breast cancer patients. We identified six patients (25%) with BRCA1 mutation of which three were found to be of novel type one in exon 16 (4956insG) and two in exon 7 (Lys110Thr) (Ser114Pro) out of 24 familial breast cancer patients studied from two different geographic regions/populations of India. Two sisters from a single family (12.5%) out of eight families from Goa with Portuguese colonial origin showed presence of founder Ashkenazi Jewish BRCA1 mutation (185delAG) along with (IVS7 561-34T>C; IVS18 5271 + 66G > A). While from New Delhi, four (25%) of 16 breast cancer families showed BRCA1 mutations; a frame shift protein truncating (4956insG), a transition nonsense (Gln1395Stop) and two amino acid substitutions (Lys110Thr) and (Ser114Pro). Only one (4%) p53 mutation (Val97Ile) in its exon 4 along with BRCA1 mutation (4956insG) could be detected. No major sequence variation in BRCA2 gene was observed except for G203A at 5' UTR of exon 2, a common population polymorphism in two Goan patients who also showed silent nucleotide change for amino acid serine at codon 1436 of BRCA1 gene. None of the 100 sporadic breast cancer patients revealed any protein truncating or deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation. Interestingly, three (3%) p53 mutations in its exon 5 were detected in sporadic breast cancer patients. Although three novel BRCA1 mutations including a founder Ashkenazi Jewish BRCA1 mutation were recorded in Indian women with familial breast cancer, the overall prevalence of BRCA gene mutations in Indian women with a family history of breast cancer appears to be low.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Breast cancer risk factors and second primary malignancies among women with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To examine the association between breast cancer risk factors and second primary cancers (independent diagnoses occurring at least 12 months after the initial breast cancer diagnosis) among breast cancer survivors. METHODS: In this population-based study, cancer outcomes among breast cancer survivors first diagnosed during 1987-2000 were investigated. Invasive breast cancer cases were identified from the statewide tumor registry and interviewed regarding their pre-diagnosis risk factors, including reproductive and lifestyle characteristics, approximately 1 year after diagnosis. Data on second primary cancers (not recurrences) and deaths were obtained by linkage with tumor registry reports and death certificates through December 31, 2002. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using proportional hazards regression stratified by age and adjusted for stage and other factors. RESULTS: Among the 10,953 breast cancer cases, 10.8% experienced a second cancer diagnosis within an average of 7 years (including 488 breast, 132 colorectal, 113 endometrial, and 36 ovarian cancers). Risk of a second primary breast cancer increased according to low parity (P = 0.002), older age at menopause (P = 0.08), greater body mass index (P = 0.003) and adult weight gain (P = 0.02), and a family history of breast cancer-particularly among women with 2 or more first-degree affected relatives (HR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1-2.9). Reduced risk of colorectal cancer after breast cancer was observed in relation to older ages at menarche (P = 0.05), younger age at menopause (P = 0.04), postmenopausal hormone use (HR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.3-0.7), normal body mass index (P = 0.07), and infrequent alcohol consumption (P = 0.01). Second endometrial cancer risk was associated with increasing body mass index (P < 0.01) and adult weight gain (P = 0.03). Risk of second ovarian cancer appeared related to recent alcohol intake and family history of breast cancer. Women who reported consuming any alcohol appeared to have a 55% reduction in ovarian cancer risk (95% CI: 0.2-1.0) compared to non-drinkers, while having 2 or more first-degree relatives with breast cancer was associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer (HR = 4.3, 95% CI: 1.3-14.6). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that family history of breast cancer as well as potentially modifiable characteristics including body weight, alcohol intake, and postmenopausal hormone use may be associated with risk of a second cancer diagnosis among breast cancer cases.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

A study of the relationship between family history of breast cancer and knowledge of breast cancer genetic testing prerequisites.

Awareness of hereditary breast cancer genetic testing, of breast cancer risk factors, and of increased level of risk based on family history are necessary before women can seek out genetic services. The aim of this paper is to describe the relationships between family history of breast cancer and awareness of genetic testing, knowledge of breast cancer risk factors, and perceived lifetime risk of breast cancer. An anonymous survey was administered by mail to a random sample of 600 women, 200 from each of three breast cancer family history groups (none, intermediate, and strong), drawn from a population-based registry of 240,000 women enrolled in a mammography screening program in the Denver Metropolitan area in Colorado. Awareness of genetic testing for breast cancer risk assessment was found to be significantly associated with family history of breast cancer, increasing from 35% in the lowest family history risk group to 67% in the group with the strongest familial risk (p = 0.002). In all family history groups, nearly 70% of respondents viewed high-fat diet and smoking as being important in relation to breast cancer risk, but alcohol was seen as being only somewhat important or not important by almost half of all respondents. Having a mother or sister with breast cancer was reported as being extremely or very important by nearly all respondents, regardless of family history. As expected, perceived lifetime risk for developing breast cancer was associated with family history (p = 0.001), but the perception of the lifetime risk for breast cancer was much higher among all of the family history groups than their true risk. In conclusion, educational interventions are needed to heighten women's awareness of genetic testing, to clarify women's knowledge of breast cancer risk factors, especially alcohol, and to reassure many women that their actual breast cancer risk is lower than they might perceive.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1992

Cancer in the contralateral breast after radiotherapy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with breast cancer have a threefold increase in the risk that a second breast cancer will develop. Radiation treatment for the initial cancer can result in moderately high doses to the contralateral breast, possibly contributing to this heightened risk. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study in a cohort of 41,109 women diagnosed with breast cancer between 1935 and 1982 in Connecticut. We reviewed the medical records of 655 women in whom a second breast cancer developed five or more years after the initial tumor and compared their radiation exposure with that of 1189 matched controls from the cohort who did not have a second cancer. The dose of radiation to the contralateral breast was estimated from the original radiotherapy records. Among the exposed women, the average radiation dose to the contralateral breast was 2.82 Gy (maximum, 7.10). RESULTS: Overall, 23 percent of the women who had a second breast cancer and 20 percent of the controls had received radiotherapy (relative risk of a second breast cancer associated with radiotherapy, 1.19). Among women who survived for at least 10 years, radiation treatment was associated with a small but marginally significant elevation in the risk of a second breast cancer (relative risk, 1.33); the risk increased significantly with the dose of radiation. An increase in risk in association with radiotherapy was evident only among women who were under 45 years of age when they were treated (relative risk, 1.59) and not among older women (relative risk, 1.01). CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy for breast cancer contributes little to the already high risk of a second cancer in the opposite breast. Fewer than 3 percent of all second breast cancers in this study could be attributed to previous radiation treatment; the risk, however, was significantly increased among women who underwent irradiation at a relatively young age (less than 45 years). Radiation exposure after the age of 45 entails little, if any, risk of radiation-induced breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Breast augmentation: a risk factor for breast cancer?

BACKGROUND: A relation between breast augmentation and the subsequent risk of breast cancer has been postulated. Since an estimated 2 million women in the United States alone have received breast implants, even a small increase in the risk of breast cancer could have considerable public health consequences. METHODS: We performed a population-based nonconcurrent cohort-linkage study. All women in Alberta, Canada, who underwent cosmetic breast augmentation from 1973 through 1986 were included in the implant cohort (n = 11,676). This cohort was compared with the cohort of all women in Alberta in whom a first primary breast cancer was diagnosed (n = 13,557). The expected number of breast-cancer cases in the implant cohort was estimated by applying age-specific and calendar year--specific incidence rates of breast cancer (obtained from the Alberta Cancer Registry) to the implant cohort. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated by dividing the observed by the expected number of breast-cancer cases in the implant cohort. RESULTS: Forty-one patients with implants were subsequently found to have breast cancer. The expected number was 86.2. The standardized incidence ratio was thus 47.6 percent, significantly lower than expected (P less than 0.01). The average length of follow-up in the implant cohort was 10.2 years, and the average length of time from breast augmentation to the diagnosis of breast cancer was 7.5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Women who undergo breast augmentation with silicone implants have a lower risk of breast cancer than the general population. This finding suggests that these women are drawn from a population already at low risk and that the implants do not substantially increase the risk.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Risk factors for breast cancer according to family history of breast cancer. For the Nurses' Health Study Research Group.

BACKGROUND: Family history of breast cancer is an established risk factor for this disease and is used to identify women at higher risk, although the impact of risk factors for breast cancer among women with a family history is not well defined. PURPOSE: Using a modified extended log-incidence Pike model, we prospectively examined the impact of risk factors for breast cancer among women with and without a family history of the disease. METHODS: Data analyzed were obtained prospectively from the Nurses' Health Study. Two thousand two hundred forty-nine incident cases of invasive breast cancer were identified in a cohort of 89,132 women aged 30-55 years in 1976 followed biennially through 1990 (1.1 million person years of follow-up). With the use of proportional hazards models, we evaluated the association between risk factors for breast cancer and risk among women with and those without a family history of the disease. We then fit a modified extended log-incidence Pike model to these data. RESULTS: Among women with a family history of breast cancer, reproductive risk factors has associations that were different from those observed among women without a family history of the disease. In particular, we observed little protection from later age at menarche, no protection from multiple births when compared with nulliparity, nor from early, as compared with later, age at first birth. Fitting these data to a model of breast cancer incidence on the basis of reproductive risk factors, we observed an adverse effect of first pregnancy on risk of breast cancer among women with a family history of breast cancer that was approximately 50% greater in magnitude than among women without a family history. Additional births after the first birth conveyed little protection for women with a family history. History of benign breast disease, past use of oral contraceptives, and use of postmenopausal hormones showed relative risks that did not differ between women with a family history and those without a family history of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a consistent increase in risk of breast cancer among women with a mother or sister history of the disease that was exacerbated by first pregnancy. Among women with a family history of breast cancer, the adverse effect of pregnancy persisted so that to age 70 years, parous women were at higher risk of breast cancer than nulliparous women. Among women without a family history of the disease, first pregnancy was associated with a smaller increase in risk, and early pregnancy and higher number of births were each associated with reduced breast cancer incidence.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Family history of breast and ovarian cancers and BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based series of early-onset breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the two major susceptibility genes involved in hereditary breast cancer. This study was undertaken to provide reliable population-based estimates of genetic influence and to characterize the nature and prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in early-onset breast cancer. METHODS: In a series comprising all women diagnosed with breast cancer under the age of 41 years in southern Sweden during 1990 through 1995 (n = 262), family history of cancer was evaluated in 95% (n = 250) of the case subjects and germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were analyzed in 89% (n = 234). All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: A total of 97 case subjects had at least one first- or second-degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer; 34 (14%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.6% to 18%) cases had at least two first- or second-degree relatives, 22 (8.8%; 95%CI = 5.3% to 12%) had one first-degree relative, and 41 (16%; 95% CI = 12% to 21%) had one second-degree relative with either cancer. If two females affected with breast or ovarian cancer who were related through an unaffected male were also defined as first-degree relatives, then a higher number of case subjects, 120 (48%; 95% CI = 42% to 54%), had at least one first-degree or second-degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer. Sixteen (6.8%; 95% CI = 4.0% to 11%) BRCA1 mutation carriers and five (2.1%; 95% CI = 0.70% to 4.9%) BRCA2 mutation carriers were identified. Among case subjects with one first- or more than one first- or second-degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer, BRCA mutations were more frequent (P<.001) than among the case subjects without this degree of family history. BRCA mutations were also statistically significantly more common among women with bilateral breast cancer than among women with unilateral breast cancer (P =.002). BRCA mutations were more common among younger case subjects than among older ones (P =.0027). CONCLUSIONS: Almost half (48%) of women in southern Sweden with early-onset breast cancer have some family history of breast or ovarian cancer, and 9.0% of early-onset breast cancer cases are associated with a germline mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Mutation carriers were more prevalent among young women, women with at least one first- or second-degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer, and women with bilateral breast cancer.

Adult↗