Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Anesthesia”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources

The difficult airway in obstetric anesthesia: techniques for airway management and the role of regional anesthesia.

A case is presented illustrating the use of a continuous spinal anesthetic in a parturient with a difficult airway who required urgent cesarean delivery. Options for endotracheal intubation of a parturient with a difficult airway are reviewed. The role of regional anesthesia in this setting is discussed. The most appropriate methods for intubation of the obstetric patient are direct laryngoscopy, the lighted stylet, and fiberoptic endoscopy. Available data suggest that regional anesthesia, specifically continuous spinal anesthesia, may be a safe and effective option for management of a parturient with a difficult airway. Further investigation of this technique is merited.

Adult↗

Parathyroid surgery using monitored anesthesia care as an alternative to general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Although there have been several reports in the literature describing a renewed interest in performing thyroid surgery under local anesthesia (LA), there has been little information regarding parathyroid surgery under local anesthesia. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our experience of 49 LA parathyroid patients over a 9-year period at a single institution. A bilateral cervical block (C2-C3) was administered by a single surgeon using lidocaine and bupivacaine. RESULTS: The study included 39 females and 10 males with an average age of 62 years (range, 35-89 years). Every surgery was curative and the final pathology revealed 46 parathyroid adenomas and 3 cases of parathyroid hyperplasia. Forty-seven percent of the patients were discharged within 6 hours of operation and the remaining patients had a 1.4-day average length of hospital stay. A group of age- and sex-matched controls who underwent parathyroid surgery using general anesthesia (GA) served as a control group with 27% of operations performed as outpatients and an average length of stay of 1.6 days. Return to work averaged 6 days for the LA group versus 8 days for the GA. In the LA group, there was one instance of postoperative hemorrhage requiring reoperation and one instance of conversion to GA secondary to an inability to tolerate LA. There were no instances of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury or permanent hypoparathyroidism in either group. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that experienced surgeons can perform parathyroid surgery safely and effectively using LA as an alternative to GA.

Adult↗

Early extubation after coronary artery surgery in efficiently rewarmed patients: a postoperative comparison of opioid anesthesia versus inhalational anesthesia and thoracic epidural analgesia.

Twenty-eight patients were studied after uncomplicated aortocoronary bypass surgery with hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In all patients residual hypothermia was effectively treated by the use of extended rewarming during CPB and postoperatively by an external heat source. This treatment almost eliminated postoperative shivering, and it resulted in the lowering of oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide production, and required ventilatory volumes to stable levels where spontaneous breathing could be used safely. The patients were divided into two groups. In group I (n = 12), intraoperative anesthesia was based on an intravenous (IV) opioid (phenoperidine), which caused persistent respiratory depression and made mechanical ventilation necessary for a mean postoperative time period of 10.7 +/- 3.8 hours even with the rewarming. In group II (n = 16), thoracic epidural analgesia and intraoperative general anesthesia with enflurane were used. In this group, postoperative metabolic and ventilatory requirements were stable and low, finger skin temperature was normalized earlier, systemic vascular resistance was lower, and stroke index was higher. Emergence from anesthesia was uneventful and was achieved early postoperatively in Group II. The patients had good pain relief and were mentally alert. Adequate spontaneous breathing was resumed quickly and endotracheal extubation was performed within the first two postoperative hours (1.6 +/- 0.5 hours). No complications or increased morbidity occurred, and no patient needed to be reintubated in Group II.

Analgesia, Epidural↗

General anesthesia versus monitored anesthesia care with remifentanil for assisted reproductive technologies: effect on pregnancy rate.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcome of assisted reproductive technology procedures in women who undergo monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with remifentanil versus general anesthesia. DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: 251 ASA physical status I and II women participating in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) program. INTERVENTIONS: During the first phase of the study, all patients underwent general anesthesia induction with alfentanil, propofol, and nitrous oxide, which was maintained with isoflurane or propofol infusion. In the second phase of the study, all patients received a standardized MAC technique with a remifentanil infusion; local anesthetics were not used. MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was pregnancy rate per transfer. The number of oocytes collected, fertilized, and cleaved was recorded, as was the number of oocytes transferred. MAIN RESULTS: Patients who underwent MAC had a greater pregnancy rate with IVF (28.2 vs. 16.3%), with ICSI (32.2% vs. 18.8%), and overall (30.6% vs. 17.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy rates in women undergoing transvaginal oocyte retrieval for assisted reproductive technologies were significantly higher with a remifentanil-based MAC technique than with a general anesthetic technique.

Adult↗

Morbidity outcome in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy undergoing cardiac septal myectomy: early-extubation anesthesia versus high-dose opioid anesthesia technique.

OBJECTIVE: Anesthetic management of patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) undergoing septal myectomy is challenging. The morbidity outcome of early-extubation anesthesia (EEA), or fast tracking, versus high-dose opioid (HDO) anesthesia was studied. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-five cardiac septal myectomy patients (EEA, n = 53; HDO, n = 122). INTERVENTIONS: EEA technique consisted of low-dose fentanyl, 10 to 15 microg/kg; propofol infusion; midazolam; and inhalation agent. HDO technique consisted of fentanyl, 50 to 100 microg/kg, and benzodiazepines, with or without an inhalation agent. Demographic data, preoperative symptoms, and data on anesthesia management and postoperative complications were recorded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups (EEA v HDO, respectively) regarding age, sex, preoperative symptoms (dyspnea, 89% v 79%; palpitations, 28% v 26%; angina, 47% v 61%; syncope, 47% v 41%), redo surgery, or combined surgery. Mean +/- standard deviation time to tracheal extubation was 7.2 +/- 5.3 hours in EEA versus 19.4 +/- 10.5 hours in HDO patients (p < 0.0001). Intensive care unit (ICU) stay was significantly shorter in EEA versus HDO patients (2.2 v 3.0 days; p < 0.005), with the trend toward earlier hospital discharge (9.7 v 11.3 days; p = 0.09). There was a high requirement for temporary pacing in both groups immediately postoperatively (EEA, 60% v HDO, 48%; p > 0.08). Permanent pacemaker insertion postoperatively was required in 7 of 53 patients (13%) in the EEA group and 11 of 122 patients (9%) in the HDO group (p > 0.25). Atrial arrhythmias occurred postoperatively in 25% of EEA patients versus 34% of HDO patients (p > 0.08). CONCLUSION: EEA facilitates earlier tracheal extubation by 12 hours in patients with HOCM undergoing septal myectomy, significantly shortening ICU stay by 1 day without increasing perioperative cardiac morbidity or mortality.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗

Paraplegia following intracord injection during attempted epidural anesthesia under general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A case of permanent paraplegia is reported following attempted epidural anesthesia for a total knee replacement in a 62-year-old woman with a history of lumbar laminectomy for a prolapsed intervertebral disc. METHODS: Epidural puncture was attempted during general anesthesia and neuromuscular block. RESULTS: After four unsuccessful attempts, an epidural catheter was inserted above the upper end of the laminectomy scar. Several episodes of arterial hypotension occurred intraoperative and postoperative. Operative blood loss was minimal, and no bone glue was used. The patient awoke paraparetic with a sensory level of anesthesia to T5 bilaterally. MRI revealed an air bubble in the cord at T10 and a region of increased T2-weighted signal in the anterior aspect of the spinal cord between T4 and T5, consistent with infarction. CONCLUSION: Standards of management are discussed in relation to this case.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗

Continuous thoracic epidural anesthesia with 0.2% ropivacaine versus general anesthesia for perioperative management of modified radical mastectomy.

We evaluated in this prospective study the effectiveness of continuous thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) and postoperative analgesia with ropivacaine and compared it with general anesthesia (GA) and opioids for pain relief, side effects, postanesthesia recovery, and hospital discharge after modified radical mastectomy. Sixty ASA physical status II and III patients undergoing mastectomy were randomly assigned to two study groups of 30 patients each. In the TEA group, an epidural catheter was inserted at T6-7, and 5--10 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine was injected to maintain anesthesia and to continuously administer adequate analgesia for 48 h. GA was induced with IV 1--2 mg of midazolam or 50--100 microg/mL of fentanyl followed by 50--150 mg of propofol and was maintained with sevoflurane and 50% N(2)O in oxygen. The Aldrete score system was used to evaluate postanesthesia recovery, a verbal rating scale was used for assessment of pain intensity, and a postanesthesia discharge scoring system was used for discharge home. The demographic data and side effects (except for nausea and vomiting) (GA 43%, TEA 10%, P = 0.0074) and discharge home were similar in both groups. However, the number of patients ready for discharge from the recovery room during the first postanesthesia hour (Aldrete score of 10) was significantly larger after TEA (80%) than after GA (33%) (P = 0.0006). GA patients experienced significantly more (P < 0.001) substantial pain than TEA patients on Day 0 (70%), Day 1 (53%), and Day 2 (27%) after the surgery. Patient satisfaction was greater with TEA (70%) than with GA (30%) (P < 0.001). We conclude that TEA with ropivacaine provides better postoperative pain relief and less nausea and vomiting, facilitates postanesthesia recovery, and gives greater patient satisfaction than GA.

Adult↗

A comparison of sevoflurane, target-controlled infusion propofol, and propofol/isoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing carotid surgery: a quality of anesthesia and recovery profile.

In a prospective randomized study in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy, we compared the hemodynamic effects, the quality of induction, and the quality of recovery from a hypnotic drug for the induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane, a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol, or propofol 1.5 microg/kg followed by isoflurane. All patients were premedicated with midazolam and received sufentanil 0.4 microg/kg at induction. The induction of anesthesia was associated with a decrease in arterial blood pressure in all groups, but this was least pronounced in the Sevoflurane group. There were similar a number of episodes of hypotension, hypertension, and tachycardia among groups, but the incidence of bradycardia was less in the TCI group (P < 0.05) compared with the other groups. The duration of episodes of hypotension was shorter (P < 0.05) in the TCI Propofol group (1.9 +/- 2.3 min) compared with the Sevoflurane group (4.7 +/- 3.6 min). The duration of episodes of bradycardia was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the TCI Propofol group (0.1 +/- 0.5 min) in comparison with the Propofol Bolus group (2.5 +/- 3.9 min). Similar doses of vasoactive drugs were used in all groups. The induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane was associated with inferior conditions for intubation in comparison with both Propofol groups, although the time to intubation was faster in the Sevoflurane group (P < 0.05). The recovery characteristics were similar in the three groups.

Aged↗

Anesthesia for cesarean section.--VI Late effects on the infant of enflurane anesthesia for cesarean section.

Enflurane anesthesia for cesarean section has given favourable results with regard to anesthetic effect and lack of depression of the neonate. Enflurane is metabolized to fluoride. High serum levels of inorganic fluoride are nephrotoxic. The nephrotoxic level is known for healthy adult kidneys but not for neonatal kidneys. In a study on enflurane anesthesia for cesarean section serum analyses revealed increased inorganic fluoride levels in the neonates. To exclude unwanted effects on the children, a follow-up study was undertaken 6-12 months after delivery. General development and renal function were studied. No abnormalities were found, indicating that enflurane anesthesia for cesarean section has no persistent unfavourable effects on the children.

Anesthesia, Inhalation↗

Full-field electroretinograms during general anesthesia in normal children compared to examination with topical anesthesia.

Full-field electroretinograms were obtained from 20 normal children during general anesthesia and compared with electroretinograms obtained with topical anesthesia. Disoprofol and fentanyl induced a reduction in the b-wave amplitudes and an increase in the cone b-wave implicit time, but the changes were small and fall within the range limits seen with topical anesthesia (i.e., average +/- 2 SD).

Anesthesia, General↗

General anesthesia versus epidural and general anesthesia in radical cystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to compare two different anesthetic techniques in radical cystectomy with regard to blood loss, transfusional requirements, intraoperative complications and the quality of analgesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 50 patients scheduled for radical cystectomy were randomized to two groups: group GA - general anesthesia, n = 25 and group CEGA - combined epidural and general anesthesia. The patients were monitored and hemodynamic changes, intraoperative bleeding, transfusional requirements, quality of analgesia and postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the demographic characteristics of the two groups. Intraoperative bleeding which was 874.8 +/- 190.7 ml in the CEGA group and 1,248.3 +/- 343.4 ml in the GA group was statistically different (p < 0.05). Significantly more intraoperative blood transfusions in terms of units were required in the GA group. Analgesia was better in the CEGA group, with VAS values at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h significantly (p < 0.05) lower than those observed in the GA group. No significant differences in intraoperative hemodynamic parameters or postoperative complications were noted between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant differences in intraoperative bleeding were observed between the two groups: CEGA provides lower intraoperative bleeding and a better postoperative analgesia. Major operations such as radical cystectomy, which also is associated with considerable blood loss, a combination of general and epidural anesthesia may allow for less blood loss, with a better postoperative analgesia and without any increase in complications.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗

Effect of thoracic epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia on segmental wall motion assessed by transesophageal echocardiography.

Patients scheduled for vascular surgery are considered at risk for perioperative cardiac complications. Choice of anesthetic in such patients is guided by a desire not to adversely affect myocardial function. On the basis of data from laboratory studies, thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) has been advocated to prevent myocardial ischemia. The aim of this study was to assess whether TEA combined with general anesthesia has any effect on segmental wall motion (SWM) monitored by transesophageal echocardiography in these patients. Patients received alfentanil, midazolam, vecuronium, and 50% N2O in oxygen, and ventilation was controlled after orotracheal intubation; 12.5 mL of 2% lidocaine HCl was injected through an epidural catheter placed at T6-7 or T7-8. Hemodynamic measurements and transesophageal echocardiographic recordings were obtained before and 10, 20, 30, 40, and 60 min after lidocaine injection. Segmental wall motion was graded a posteriori by two independent experts on a predetermined scale (from 1 = normal to 5 = dyskinesia). A decrease greater than or equal to 2 grades was considered an SWM abnormality indicative of ischemia. Thoracic epidural anesthesia induced a decrease in systemic arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiac index. The SWM score decreased slightly from 1.34 +/- 0.68 to 1.27 +/- 0.64 (mean +/- SD) (at 10 and 20 min, respectively) (P less than 0.05). Patients were a posteriori analyzed according to whether they had documented coronary artery disease or not. The SWM score before TEA was significantly higher in patients with documented coronary artery disease (1.51 +/- 0.88 vs 1.17 +/- 0.51, respectively; P less than 0.05) and did not change significantly after TEA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗

The effect of ephedrine bolus administration on left ventricular loading and systolic performance during high thoracic epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia.

We investigated the effect of ephedrine on left ventricular function in patients without cardiovascular disease under high thoracic epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia. Because the epidural block was extended to all cardiac segments, ephedrine was assumed to be deprived of its centrally mediated actions. Left ventricular (LV) function was assessed using transesophageal echocardiography. We measured arterial pressure (AP), heart rate (HR), LV end-systolic and end-diastolic diameter and area (ESA, EDA), wall thickness, and LV ejection time before and after intravenous ephedrine bolus administration. We calculated area ejection fraction (EFA), end-systolic wall stress (ESWS), and mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (mVcfc). Ephedrine had a biphasic effect on left ventricular function. It transiently decreased EDA from 18.9 to 16.5 cm2 (mean), whereas EFA and mVcfc were increased from 33% to 49%, and from 1.88 to 2.67 circumferences/s, respectively. During the second phase, ephedrine increased mean arterial pressure (MAP) from a baseline value of 62 to 87 mm Hg, EDA was restored to 19.3 cm2, and EFA and mVcfc remained above baseline (52% and 2.64 circumferences/s, respectively). ESWS was not significantly increased from baseline. We conclude that ephedrine improves left ventricular contractility, even in the presence of high thoracic epidural anesthesia, without causing relevant changes of left ventricular afterload.

Adult↗

Can the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale be used to measure patient satisfaction with cataract care under topical local anesthesia and monitored sedation at a community hospital?

Patient satisfaction ratings provide a means to evaluate and monitor quality of health care. We tested the ability of the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS) to measure satisfaction with cataract care under topical local anesthesia and monitored sedation given by an anesthesiologist at a community hospital. Three hundred six patients were administered the ISAS along with alternate ratings of quality of care and patient satisfaction. There were no incomplete questionnaires. The ISAS demonstrated reasonable reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.68; test-retest = 0.48-0.67). The ISAS had excellent construct validity; ISAS scores were lower in patients who gave lower ratings of quality (4.98 versus 5.64), who had lower satisfaction visual analog scale scores (5.12 versus 5.65), who wanted changes in their care (4.76 versus 5.67), who had suggestions to improve care (5.08 versus 5.63), or who preferred more sedation (4.85 versus 5.66) (P < 0.0001). Our results indicate that the ISAS questionnaire is a feasible, reliable, and valid tool to measure patient satisfaction in patients undergoing cataract surgery under topical anesthesia and monitored sedation.

Aged↗

Local/cervical block anesthesia versus general anesthesia for minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: what are the advantages?

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) under local/cervical block anesthesia (LA) is safe and effective for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (HPT). Advantages of LA versus general anesthesia (GA) for these focused procedures have not been clearly demonstrated. METHODS: Between 3/01 and 6/04, 177 consecutive patients with primary HPT and positive localization studies underwent MIP. Seventy-three (41%) had surgery under LA while 104 (59%) had GA. Primary endpoints were IV narcotic use, anti-emetic use, nausea, vomiting, and post-operative pain. RESULTS: Patients who had parathyroidectomy under LA were older (64 +/- 2 vs. 57 +/- 2 years, P = 0.001). Cure and complication rates were identical between the two groups. Patients who had parathyroidectomy under LA required less IV narcotic pain mediation (mean morphine equivalents 11.4 +/- 1.3 mg vs. 22.5 +/- 1.1 mg; P < 0.001) compared to GA patients. The LA patients had better pain control as shown by lower post-operative peak pain scores (2.9 +/- 0.3 vs. 5.0 +/- 0.4; P < 0.001) and lower overall pain scores (mean 1.9 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.2; P < 0.001). The LA group required fewer anti-emetic medications compared to the GA patients (mean 0.4 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.1 doses; P < 0.001). Fewer LA patients experienced post-operative nausea (16% vs. 49%; P < 0.001), and vomiting (7% vs. 24%; P = 0.002). Length of stay was similar between the groups (0.4 +/- 0 vs. 0.3 +/- 0; P = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: In this study the choice of anesthesia did not affect surgical cure rate, morbidity, or length of stay. LA was associated with significantly lower post-operative pain, nausea, and vomiting. LA appears to offer specific advantages more than GA for patients undergoing MIP.

Anesthesia, General↗

Complications of bronchoscopy: comparison of rigid bronchoscopy under general anesthesia and flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy under topical anesthesia.

A prospective study of 4,595 bronchoscopic procedures performed over four years (1975 to 1978) on 2,143 patients with various bronchopulmonary diseases is described. Of the 4,595 procedures, 1,146 were performed with a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (Olympus BF-5B2 or BF-B2) under topical anesthesia with tetracaine and procaine, and 3,449 procedures were performed with a rigid bronchoscope under general intravenous anesthesia with hexobarbital (Evipan) using a modified Sanders' technique to ventilate the patients. Complications occurred in 235 procedures (5.1 percent). Major complications that threatened the patient's life and required intensive medical treatment, surgical intervention, or resuscitative measures occurred in 51 procedures (1.1 percent); deaths occurred after 6 procedures (0.1 percent). A comparison of the complications of rigid bronchoscopy and flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy revealed significantly higher rates of complications of fiberoptic bronchoscopy attributable to toxic effects of tetracaine and of complications of rigid bronchoscopy associated with insufficient general anesthesia. With rigid bronchoscopy, the number of major complications induced by diagnostic manipulations through the bronchoscope and the total number of major complications were significantly higher than with flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy.

Anesthesia, General↗

Preemptive analgesia and local anesthesia as a supplement to general anesthesia: a review.

General anesthesia (GA) and local anesthesia (LA) evolved on separate tracks. Procedures that could not be performed under LA were typically conducted under GA. Decoding of afferent linkage of peripheral noxious stimuli has provided important understanding that may change the way we traditionally treat surgical pain. In the 1980s, animal studies suggested that preemptive peripheral blocking of painful (nociceptive) stimuli to the central nervous system with regional anesthesia or LA and nonsteroidal analgesics could be beneficial in attenuating postoperative pain. Clinical studies based on this knowledge suggest combining LA with GA, and perhaps non-steroidal analgesics with or without narcotics, to reduce the severity of postoperative pain. General anesthetics can be given in lower minimal alveolar concentration when combined with LA, and recovery characteristics are superior. Increasing evidence suggests that the combined use of GA and LA may reduce the afferent barrage of surgery, and that preemptive analgesia may reduce postoperative pain and should be used in patient care. This article reviews the evidence supporting the combined use of LA or analgesics with GA or sedation to provide improved pain management after surgery.

Analgesia↗

Effect of ketoprofen, lidocaine local anesthesia, and combined xylazine and lidocaine caudal epidural anesthesia during castration of beef cattle on stress responses, immunity, growth, and behavior.

To determine the effects of burdizzo castration alone or in combination with ketoprofen (K), local anesthesia (LA), or caudal epidural anesthesia (EPI) on plasma cortisol, acute-phase proteins, interferon-gamma production, growth, and behavior of beef cattle, 50 Holstein x Friesian bulls (13 mo old, 307 +/- 5.3 kg) were assigned to (n = 10/treatment): 1) control (handled; C); 2) burdizzo castration (B); 3) B following K (3 mg/ kg of BW i.v.; BK); 4) B following LA (8 mL into each testis and 3 mL s.c. along the line where the jaws of the burdizzo were applied with 2% lidocaine HCl; BLA); and 5) B following EPI (0.05 mg/kg of BW of xylazine HCl and 0.4 mg/kg of BW of lidocaine HCl as caudal epidural; BEPI). The area under the cortisol curve against time was lower (P < 0.05) in BK than in B, BLA, or BEPI animals. On d 1 after treatment, plasma haptoglobin concentrations were higher (P < 0.05) in B, BLA, and BEPI than in BK animals. On d 3, haptoglobin and plasma fibrinogen concentrations were higher (P < 0.05) in all castration groups than in C. On d 7, haptoglobin and fibrinogen concentrations remained higher (P < 0.05) in BLA than in B and C animals. On d 1, concanavalin A-induced interferon-gamma production was lower (P < 0.05) in B, BLA, and BEPI than in C, but there was no difference between BK and C animals. From d -1 to 35, ADG was lower (P < 0.05) in B, BLA, and BEPI animals, but not in BK compared with C animals. Overall, there was a higher (P < 0.05) incidence of combined abnormal postures in B than in C, BK and BEPI animals. Although the use of K and EPI decreased (P < 0.05) these postures compared with B alone or B with LA, there was no difference between the K and EPI treatment. In conclusion, burdizzo castration increased plasma cortisol and acute-phase proteins, and suppressed immune function and growth rates. Local anesthesia prolonged the increase in acute-phase proteins. Ketoprofen was more effective than LA or EPI in decreasing cortisol and partially reversed the reduction in ADG following castration. The use of K or EPI was more effective than LA in decreasing pain-associated behavioral responses observed during the first 6 h after treatment. Systemic analgesia with ketoprofen, a non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug, was more effective in reducing inflammatory responses associated with castration than LA or EPI.

Acute-Phase Proteins↗