Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “AUTOPSIES”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources

Unexpected autopsy findings arising from postmortem ocular examination.

BACKGROUND: A full autopsy at our institution includes removal of the eyes for pathologic examination. To our knowledge, the rate of ophthalmic findings at autopsy has not been documented previously. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed 277 consecutive autopsies conducted between 1995 and 1999 in which the eyes were removed for examination. Ophthalmic findings were placed in the following categories: I, major findings included those that contributed to the patient's death, would have changed patient management, and/or may have important medical implications for close relatives; II, expected findings after ophthalmologic surgery and minor findings that may have eventually required treatment; and III, incidental findings. RESULTS: Major findings (category I) were found in 32% of autopsies. Minor findings (category II) and incidental findings (category III) were documented in 62% and 34% of autopsies, respectively. Only 14% of autopsies revealed no ophthalmologic diagnoses. CONCLUSION: In our series, postmortem ocular examination revealed a number of important findings, including several heritable and rare conditions. Eighty-six percent of autopsies disclosed at least one pathologic ophthalmologic finding, approximately one third of which demonstrated findings significant enough to have likely required management. Diabetic retinopathy was the most frequent major finding. Malignant melanoma of the choroid was the most commonly found intraocular neoplasm. Chronic uveitis was the most common minor finding. We conclude that important, often unexpected ophthalmic findings are frequently encountered at autopsy, underscoring the relevance of routine postmortem examination of the eyes.

Adolescent↗

Review of pediatric autopsies performed at a university hospital in Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.

CONTEXT: Autopsy continues to provide important data for quality assurance, teaching, scientific purposes, and health planning, especially if performed according to a comprehensive protocol. OBJECTIVE: To describe and analyze data from all perinatal and pediatric autopsies performed at a university hospital in Brazil. DESIGN: Review of data from 1716 autopsies performed between April 1993 and April 1999, consisting of age at death, congenital defects, gender, and cause of death. RESULTS: Age at death distribution: early neonatal deaths, 31.7%; stillbirth, 25.7%; 1 to 11 months, 19.6%; 1 to 5 years, 10.3%; late neonatal deaths, 6.3%; 11 to 15 years, 4%; 6 to 10 years, 2.5%. Cause of death: perinatal conditions, 51%; congenital malformation(s), 24.4%; infection, 11.9%; neoplasm, 3%; hematologic/immunologic, 2.3%; neurologic, 1.6%; gastrointestinal, 1.5%; cardiovascular, 0.7%; respiratory, 0.6%; genitourinary, 0.3%; other disorders, 0.5%. Gender distribution: male, 54.31%; female, 45.22%; indeterminate, 0.41%; data unavailable, 0.06%. Congenital anomalies were found in 31.5% of the autopsies and were the cause of death in 24.41% of the autopsies. CONCLUSIONS: High autopsy rates, combined with a comprehensive autopsy protocol, allowed the characterization of perinatal and pediatric deaths. The high proportion of perinatal deaths and stillbirths indicates the need for improvement in the prenatal care program. Congenital anomalies were highly prevalent because few pregnancies are interrupted in Brazil. The low number of cancer cases autopsied was attributed to the fact that most patients die at home, and to the high level of trust between the oncology team and the family, with the erroneous assumption that no relevant information would be provided.

Adolescent↗

[Autopsies as an important indicator for quality control].

The decreasing number of autopsies, in the Netherlands as well, is deplorable because with it an important instrument of medical quality control is likely to disappear. For this not only the relatives, but also the attending physicians and the pathologists are to blame. To turn the tide we need some drastic changes in our attitude towards autopsies. The families should known that an autopsy is a right they have in order to check the quality of diagnosis and treatment of their beloved, it is not a favour towards the physician. A physician who does not see a reason for autopsy, should explain that to the family. Pathologists should think about and realize a subspecialty of autopsy pathology with a thorough training in pathophysiology and intensive care medicine. Autopsy reports should be of the highest quality and reach the physician within a few weeks. A required autopsy percentage should be introduced into the certification process of medical specialists and hospitals and the possibility of Continuous Medical Education credit points for physicians with a certain autopsy percentage should be considered.

Autopsy↗

Autopsy rates at the University Hospital of the West Indies, 1968-1997.

Autopsy rates have not been reported at the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI) for more than three decades. Declining rates have been documented worldwide, and so we sought to define autopsy rates over the past three decades at UHWI. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the numbers and types of autopsies performed on deaths occurring in the institution, and calculated the relevant autopsy rates. The overall autopsy rate for the study period was 52.7%, with a statistically significant decline from 65.3% in the first decade to 39.3% in the third. The non-coroner's autopsy rate showed a concomitant decline from 57.5% to 31.5%, while the coroner's autopsy rate remained stable with a slight increase from 28.1% to 29.1%. The factors that might have led to the decline of the autopsy are discussed.

Autopsy↗

Perinatal mortality: clinical value of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging compared with autopsy in routine obstetric practice.

OBJECTIVE: To compare postmortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with autopsy in perinatal deaths. To determine the acceptance and feasibility of postmortem perinatal MRI. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Large teaching hospital. POPULATION: Fetuses and neonates from 16 weeks gestational age until 28 days after birth, stillbirths as well as intrapartum and neonatal deaths. METHODS: MRI was performed prior to autopsy in a consecutive cohort of perinatal deaths after full parental consent. Agreement between MRI and autopsy was calculated. The consent rate for both examinations was recorded separately, as well as the time between the perinatal death and the MRI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Full agreement between MRI and autopsy. RESULTS: Of 58 cases, 26 parents consented to both examinations (45%). Autopsy showed 18 major malformations, of which 10 were detected with MRI. The positive predictive value of MRI was 80% (4/5) and the negative predictive value was 65% (13/20). Additional consent for MRI was given in eight cases (14%). In 84%, the MRI could be performed within 48 hours. CONCLUSIONS: MRI is of value if autopsy is refused, but diagnostic accuracy is insufficient to recommend substitution of full autopsy. The acceptance rate of MRI only is better than that of autopsy.

Autopsy↗

[Is autopsy, the oldest tool of quality assurance, obsolete?].

The declining frequency of autopsies raises the question as to whether the goals of autopsy (particularly with respect to quality management) can still be achieved in a way that guarantees high standards. The quality of diagnostic procedures (and probably therapeutic as well) depends on the frequency of autopsies in a hospital. The reasons for declining autopsy rates are manifold. Considering the indisputable importance of autopsies, the question as to the reasons for the decrease and possible solutions of this problem should be discussed. The clear aim should be to raise the frequency of hospital autopsies to 30-40%, a figure considered to enable a valuable quality control. Own studies have shown that a highly-efficient collaboration not only supports a rapid communication of the findings, but also leads to an improvement of the autopsy quality and, due to a better practice-related outcome, to a better acceptance from the side of clinicians and pathologists. This results in turn in increased autopsy rates. By these methods of cooperation, a well-accepted quality management should be achieved and should be in the interest of patients, physicians, hospital managers, and health insurances.

Autopsy↗

Geriatric autopsy findings in the last 10 years: an Urban Teaching Hospital experience.

In this study, we reviewed autopsy records for clinical data and autopsy findings from patients aged 70 or more, over a 10-year period (1993 to 2002) in an urban university hospital. For that period, there were a total of 772 autopsy cases of which 180 (23%) patients were aged 70 years or older. We found that despite a marked decrease in total autopsy rates, there has been a perceptible rise in geriatric cases. Cardiovascular and infectious diseases in this age group are the leading causes of death as reported nationally. We found that women died more of acute myocardial infarctions than men, even though hypertensive and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases not otherwise specified were more prevalent in men. It is our conclusion that at our institution: 1) despite a marked decrease in the total autopsy rate, the geriatric autopsy rate is rising; 2) infectious and cardiovascular diseases are the leading causes of death in elderly patients; 3) Myocardial infarcts as a cause of death are more often seen in women for this age group. It is also our impression that better autopsy reporting is needed for maximal utilization of autopsy findings in medical auditing and teaching and for improvements in the quality of patient care in general and the geriatric patient in particular.

Aged↗

A retrospective study of the accuracy between clinical and autopsy cause of death in the University of Malaya Medical Centre.

It is well known that diagnostic accuracy of the clinical cause of death has not improved despite advances in diagnostic techniques. We aimed to investigate the accuracy of the clinical cause of death compared with the autopsy cause of death and to see if the Coroner's autopsy can play a role in clinical audit. Our study population consisted of all autopsies where the deceased was hospitalised or resuscitated at the Accident and Emergency Unit of the University of Malaya Medical Centre before death, performed during the period July 1998 to June 2000. The cases were subdivided according to natural and unnatural causes of deaths. Natural deaths were further subdivided in relation to the main organ systems involved while unnatural deaths were subcategorised into trauma, poisoning and burns. The rate of agreement between clinical and autopsy cause of death was further compared with duration of survival in the hospital. Of 132 autopsies included in this study, 115 were Coroner's autopsies. 78% of cases showed agreement between clinical and autopsy cause of death. The agreement rate in Coroner's cases was 80.0%. For natural and unnatural causes, the agreement rate was 56.7% and 84.3% respectively. There were 6 cases (4.5%) where an initial accurate diagnosis might have altered the prognosis of the deceased. In general, the rate of agreement increased with duration of survival of patients. However, this was no longer observed after a survival of more than 28 days. Our findings agree with other similar studies. The diagnostic accuracy of cause of death has not improved despite the modernisation in medical technology. The autopsy still plays an important role in clinical audit and medical education.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Medical autopsy: whose gain is it? An audit.

Medical audit is essential in assessing the efficacy of health care delivery system. Though autopsy services are generally looked upon indifferently and with sceptism by the clinicians, it can form an important part of the medical audit system. The aims of this study were to audit autopsies of deaths within 24 hours of hospital admission by: 1) Comparing premortem and postmortem diagnosis; 2) Comparing postmortem gross diagnosis with postmortem histopathologic diagnosis; 3) Whether deaths could be certified based on clinical judgement and autopsies avoided. The study sample was 99 autopsies. In 45% autopsies, clinical impression did not match the final cause of death. In 14.2% autopsies, final cause of death could have been given by the clinician based on his clinical judgement. In 54.5% autopsies, there was agreement between premortem and postmortem diagnosis. In 67.6% autopsies, gross findings matched with the histopathologic findings.

Autopsy↗

[Cardiovascular pathology and the partial autopsy. The experience at the Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez of Mexico].

There is no doubt autopsies are still a powerful source of medical information. At the Instituto Nacional de Cardiología de México 50% of deaths are autopsied. About half are limited cardiothoracic studies. Since no previous evaluation of the utility of the information obtained from those limited necropsies, we decided to test how well they allowed for a good clinical and anatomical correlation of main disease and a cause of death, as well as their potential to respond clinical questions relevant to the case. We analyzed the medical and autopsy records from 50 cases and determined autopsy type (limited or total), age, sex, main disease and cause of death. It was also included a list of questions made by the attending physician who asked for autopsy. Twenty-six cases corresponded to limited autopsies. In 96.1% there was a good anatomical and clinical correlation of main disease. In 69.2% the cause of death had also a good correlation and in 92.3% of the cases the clinician's question were answered appropriately. Based in our results we support the idea that cardiovascular limited autopsies are an alternative way to obtain useful information, when otherwise, total autopsies result expensive or difficult to obtain.

Academies and Institutes↗

Physicians' attitudes toward the autopsy of patients with AIDS.

In spite of the value of autopsy in modern medicine, autopsy rates continue to decline. This decline has been especially pronounced for patients who die of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). In this paper, we assess the attitudes of house officers toward the autopsy in AIDS patients. The survey encompassed 112 internal medicine housestaff (IMHS) and 37 pathology housestaff (PHS) at two New York City university hospitals that care for large numbers of AIDS patients. A self-administered questionnaire rated attitudes and practices concerning the autopsy in AIDS patients. Of IMHS, 83%, and of PHS, 89% answered the questionnaire. The vast majority of IMHS felt that the autopsy rate in persons dying of AIDS was too low; only 39% of PHS shared their view. Of the PHS, 36% felt the rate was too high and should be decreased. These PHS felt the autopsy rarely resulted in useful information and unnecessarily exposed the pathologist to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The IMHS wanted more formal training in methods of discussing these issues with the patient and family. We conclude that there is a need for postgraduate teaching programs to educate on issues concerning the autopsy. Specifically, the IMHS need instruction on communicating with the family about the autopsy, and the PHS need instruction on the risks of acquiring AIDS from occupational exposure.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Evaluation of a perinatal autopsy protocol: influence of the Prenatal Diagnosis Conference Team.

This study was designed to evaluate changes in the perinatal autopsy following the adoption of a new autopsy protocol. The University of Utah Medical Center has a Prenatal Diagnosis Conference Team composed of obstetricians, pediatricians, geneticists, and other health care professionals. These individuals are involved in the care of patients whose pregnancies are at risk for congenital malformations. An autopsy protocol was designed to increase the interaction of the pathologist with the Prenatal Diagnosis Conference Team in the evaluation of perinatal death. Two years, 1982 and 1987, before and after the protocol was implemented, were selected for retrospective review. The autopsies in 1987 made more specific diagnoses compared with those in 1982. Additional congenital anomalies were diagnosed, and increased numbers of patients were found to have well-described congenital disorders. The number of attempted postnatal autopsy chromosome studies increased and more chromosomal abnormalities were detected. The final autopsy diagnoses made in 1987 have provided more information to the physician for genetic or other patient counseling. After the protocol was adopted, increased numbers of cases were referred to the Medical Center for evaluation at autopsy. More of those who came to autopsy had been evaluated during life by members of the Prenatal Diagnosis Conference Team. Premortem sonograms had been done at an earlier gestational age and a greater number of anomalies were detected. Fewer of the fetuses had intrauterine death and more had pregnancy terminated by induction of labor. The gestational age at delivery declined.

Autopsy↗

[Regulations for autopsy and organ removal in Sweden].

In Sweden clinical autopsies are controlled by the autopsy law, which prescribes information to the relatives about the planned autopsy. Permission by the patient before death or by the relatives after information is mandatory. The performance of the autopsy is not regulated. For forensic autopsies no information or permission is prescribed. The performance and the documentation of the autopsy is strictly regulated and no partial autopsies are permitted. Forensic autopsies must be performed by forensic pathologists. A comparison is made of the legislation in the scandinavian countries and the Federal Republik of Germany.

Autopsy↗

Nursing home autopsies. Survey of physician attitudes and practice patterns.

Autopsy rates remain disturbingly low in nursing homes despite the fact that 1 of 5 deaths occurs in this setting. To determine the autopsy rate for nursing homes, we analyzed all deaths occurring in New York State nursing homes from 1980 to 1984. Of 58,985 nursing home deaths, autopsies were performed in only 499 cases (0.8%). In comparison to the general nursing home population, autopsied residents were more likely to be male and never married and less likely to be widowed. Of 110 practicing nursing home physicians surveyed, 19% believed autopsies had little if any value in the nursing home population, whereas 71% saw autopsy as a valuable tool but rarely requested one. Fewer than 1 in 10 physicians routinely discussed autopsies with patients and/or families before death. Perceived obstacles included the emotional lability of patients and families and a lack of financial reimbursement. Concerns over religious objections, funeral delays, and unnecessary mutilation were cited by fewer than one third of respondents. Facilitation of consent, physician education, and cost sharing may all contribute to enhanced rates of autopsies in the future.

Aged↗

[Review of 43 autopsy cases of urogenital malignant tumors].

Autopsy findings were reviewed in 43 patients clinically diagnosed in the last 12 years as having urogenital malignant tumors. Clinical diagnoses were 14 bladder carcinoma, 11 prostatic carcinoma, 6 renal cell carcinoma, 5 renal pelvic carcinoma, and 7 other malignant tumors. Autopsy showed that 31 cases died due to carcinoma and 12 because of other causes. The most common ultimate causes of death were DIC and infection, especially pneumonia and sepsis. Autopsy showed 36 of the 43 cases (83.7%) with metastasis. Clinical diagnosis showed 34 cases of metastasis, but the number of metastasized organs and lymph-nodes was much lower than in subsequent autopsy findings. Autopsy proved 5 cases of clinical misdiagnosis (11.6%) and 4 of undiagnosed malignant tumors (9.3%). In 15 cases (32.6%) the ultimate cause of death as revealed by autopsy had not been clinically diagnosed. Five cases diagnosed as having died due to cancer in fact were found to have died due to other causes. Recent diagnostic techniques are greatly advanced, yet many findings are still revealed for the first time by autopsy. Autopsy continues to be a very important final arbiter of progress and the effect of malignant tumors, and serves to remind us of the ongoing need for constant vigilance and improvement of clinical diagnostic techniques.

Autopsy↗

Surgical audit without autopsy: tales of the unexpected.

To establish our current practice and the potential value of the autopsy in general surgery, a retrospective review of general surgical autopsies was performed at one district general hospital from January 1989 to August 1991. There was considerable interconsultant variation in autopsy practice with a low 25% overall autopsy rate reflecting a low autopsy request rate. There were discrepancies between the clinical and pathological cause of death in 40 (63%) cases. There were important discrepancies which may have changed management in life in 18 (28%) autopsies, 7 (39%) of which were untreated visceral perforations. Autopsy is an important part of the surgical audit and will disclose considerable unsuspected pathology. Present autopsy rates are low and need to be improved. The unexpected finding of seven untreated visceral perforations requires further study.

Adult↗

Maximizing the benefits of autopsy for clinicians and families. What needs to be done.

The benefits of autopsy, both for clinicians and families, are reviewed. The autopsy rate in the United States has fallen dramatically in the past 50 years. The many factors contributing to this decline are summarized. For clinicians and families to receive the maximum benefits from the autopsy will require (1) altering methods of obtaining consent (eg, using trained autopsy advocates and enhancing awareness of cultural issues); (2) altering autopsy procedures (eg, decreasing turnaround time; discussing issues and concerns with clinicians; and issuing more detailed, less technical reports); (3) improving communication with clinicians and families (eg, collecting clinician and family contact information on autopsy permits; inviting attendings, housestaff, and students to attend gross conferences; making telephone calls regarding unexpected findings; guaranteeing reports to clinicians; writing nontechnical summary letters to clinicians and families when the final report is completed; and conducting postautopsy conferences); and (4) educating both medical professionals and public citizens about the value of autopsy (eg, featuring autopsy results in medical conferences, distributing educational materials, and using print and electronic media).

Attitude to Death↗

Relating autopsy requirements to the contemporary accreditation process.

The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations has long been a strong proponent of the autopsy. Standards related to autopsies are clearly set forth in the current manual for hospitals. However, radical changes in the health care environment and in the philosophy of accreditation are placing the use of autopsy results in a new context. In that context, autopsy results are competing with other performance measures as drivers of quality improvement, and the autopsy itself is competing for scarce resources. A successful outcome will require autopsy advocates to persuade key audiences (viz, consumers, purchasers, and hospital executives) that autopsy findings lead to substantive improvements in the delivery of care, and that the autopsy is more worthy of support than other sources of performance data.

Accreditation↗