Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “APPENDECTOMY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

[An outbreak of appendectomies in La Désirade, Guadeloupe, August 1995-July 1996].

BACKGROUND: In October 1995, over 50 cases of appendectomies among the 1.605 residents of the island La Désirade (Guadeloupe) were reported by the only island clinician to the local health authority. We describe the outbreak investigations which were implemented in order to describe the phenomenon and generate hypotheses on its cause. METHODS: An exhaustive case finding of residents having undergone appendectomy between 10 August 1995 and 22 July 1996 was conducted. We reviewed the medical charts of the cases; read pathology slides; interviewed cases and their families to retrieve detailed clinical history; studied the prevalence of markers of infection and of stool pathogens and analysed water supply quality data. RESULTS: We identified 226 cases of appendectomy (14% of the island population), 40% in May-June 1996, 46% in males and 40% under 15 years of age. Clinical, biological and pathological findings were heterogeneous and did not support the hypothesis of an outbreak of appendicitis. The study of abdominal symptoms in the families of the cases did not support person to person transmission but revealed frequent, subacute or chronic abdominal complaints. The analysis of markers of infection or of stool bacteria and parasites in a self selected sample of the island population was not suggestive. Water supply did not show any bacterial or chemical contamination. CONCLUSION: The investigation of a large outbreak of appendectomies was unable to find a single infectious or toxic origin to a high prevalence of chronic abdominal symptoms in an isolated population. An inappropriate medical answer in an isolated population probably turned heterogeneous complaints into an outbreak with major public health consequences.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Laparoscopic appendectomy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic appendectomy in women with chronic pelvic pain and to identify histopathology of the appendix. DESIGN: Retrospective review over 6.5 years (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: Laparoscopic center and community hospital. PATIENTS: Three hundred seventeen women. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic appendectomy in conjunction with other procedures. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 317 patients who underwent appendectomy, 14 (4.4%) had involvement of the appendix with endometriosis, 12 (3.78%) had early acute appendicitis, 4 (1.26%) had carcinoid tumors of the appendix, 2 (0.63%) had a large mucocele, and 1 (0.9%) each had Enterobius vermicularis infection, benign neuroma, and mucinous cystadenoma. Seventy-eight women (24.6%) had obliteration of the appendiceal lumen and 22 (6.93%) had entrapping fibrous adhesions. Thirty-two patients (10%) reported relief of chronic pelvic pain in the absence of other pathology just by having diagnostic laparoscopy with appendectomy. CONCLUSION: The appendix is a key organ in the evaluation of undiagnosed chronic pelvic pain.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Role of appendectomy and tonsillectomy in pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis.

We wished to determine the effect of appendectomy and tonsillectomy on the subsequent risk for development of ulcerative colitis (UC). We conducted a case-control study at the University of Oklahoma Hospital and VA Medical Center gastroenterology clinics, as well as at the offices of private physicians. Subjects being followed for UC formed the study group. Patients being followed at Internal Medicine Associates of the University of Oklahoma clinics formed the controls. We recorded the patient's name, age, sex, race, history of smoking, and history of appendectomy or tonsillectomy. The study group consisted of 193 patients, and there were 394 controls. The prevalence of appendectomy was lower (17.8% vs 5.2%) among patients with UC (P < 0.01). The prevalence of tonsillectomy was similar in the two groups (20.6% vs 18.1%; P = NS). We conclude that appendectomy is associated with a decreased risk for subsequent development of ulcerative colitis.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Laparoscopic appendectomy: An unnecessary and expensive procedure in children?

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Laparoscopic Appendectomy (LA) is a safe procedure in adults resulting in shorter hospitalization and sooner return to activity. The relative merits of LA and open appendectomy (OA) are evaluated in this first prospective and randomized study in children. METHODS: A total of 129 children with appendicitis were included. Forty-three boys and 45 girls, age 1 to 16 years, were enrolled. Randomization was determined by sealed assignment card. OA utilized a 3- to 4-cm right lower quadrant, muscle-splitting incision. Wounds were closed without drains. Antibiotics, when used, consisted of gentamycin, clindamycin, and ampicillin. LA was performed by experienced surgeons utilizing a 3-trocar technique with reusable instruments. Twenty-one children (24%) were perforated. Patients were discharged as soon as they were taking a diet and afebrile. Statistical comparisons were by Fisher's Exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS: There were no differences in postoperative analgesia, resumption of oral intake, length of hospitalization, return to normal activities, or morbidity. Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with longer operating times and increased cost. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic appendectomy in children is not associated with the same advantages reported in adults. LA is a more expensive alternative and offers no advantages related to pain relief, length of stay, return to normal activities, or morbidity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

[Endoscopic appendectomy in gynecology and obstetrics].

From 1987 to 1990, 99 patients were treated for appendicitis. 67 patients were treated by endoscopic appendectomy, 32 patients underwent laparotomy for appendectomy. Among these 67 patients we found 4 patients with endometriosis, 6 with pelvic inflammatory disease, and 4 pregnant patients. In no case did we have difficulties during the laparoscopic operation; only 4 patients developed severe inflammatory complications during the postoperative period. For this reason, we do not perform a prophylactic appendectomy during gynaecological laparoscopies. We recommend careful postoperative treatment after laparoscopic appendectomy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Video-assisted extracorporeal appendectomy.

BACKGROUND: Despite many randomized controlled trials, there are still several important doubts about laparoscopic appendectomy. Longer operative time and greater cost are the two major disadvantages of the laparoscopic technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In current techniques of laparoscopic appendectomy, the appendix is ligated and divided within the abdominal cavity. We have performed 423 laparoscopic appendectomies using an extracorporeal technique during the last 8 years. In this technique, the appendix is delivered to the surface through the cannula, and appendectomy is carried out extracorporally. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The extracorporeal technique of appendix removal can be performed as safely and efficiently as the open technique. We report our data on the series of 423 operations, in which we had the encouraging experience that the video-assisted extracorporeal technique is a practical and reasonable alternative to the traditional laparoscopic technique.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Laparoscopic "radical appendectomy" is an effective alternative to endoscopic removal of cecal polyps.

BACKGROUND: The endoscopic removal of cecal polyps can be complicated by hemorrhage, perforation, or incomplete resection. Laparoscopic radical appendectomy represents a safe alternative for the definitive resection and accurate pathologic evaluation of selected cecal polyps. METHODS: Patients with cecal cap polyps not involving the ileocecal valve were candidates for laparoscopic radical appendectomy. Intraoperative colonoscopy and resection of the appendix and cecum to the level of the ileocecal valve were accomplished via three midline ports. For each patient, histologic evaluation by frozen section ruled out malignancy and ensured complete resection. RESULTS: Five patients, four of whom had significant medical comorbidities, presented with large adenomatous polyps contained within the cecum. Each polyp was determined to be unresectable endoscopically; therefore, a laparoscopic radical appendectomy was performed. One patient with cirrhosis also underwent intraoperative liver ultrasonography and biopsies, which contributed to the longest operative time and hospital stay. The histologic diagnosis by frozen section was benign for each patient. The mean operative time was 95 minutes, and the mean length of hospital stay was 1.8 days. No postoperative complications were observed during a mean follow-up of 6 months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic "radical appendectomy" is an effective treatment for selected cecal adenomatous polyps. Our ability to resect the polyps completely and avoid a standard right hemicolectomy supports this approach.

Adenomatous Polyps↗
PubMed1990

The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States.

To describe the epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States, the authors analyzed National Hospital Discharge Survey data for the years 1979-1984. Approximately 250,000 cases of appendicitis occurred annually in the United States during this period, accounting for an estimated 1 million hospital days per year. The highest incidence of primary positive appendectomy (appendicitis) was found in persons aged 10-19 years (23.3 per 10,000 population per year); males had higher rates of appendicitis than females for all age groups (overall rate ratio, 1.4:1). Racial, geographic, and seasonal differences were also noted. Appendicitis rates were 1.5 times higher for whites than for nonwhites, highest (15.4 per 10,000 population per year) in the west north central region, and 11.3% higher in the summer than in the winter months. The highest rate of incidental appendectomy was found in women aged 35-44 years (43.8 per 10,000 population per year), 12.1 times higher than the rate for men of the same age. Between 1970 and 1984, the incidence of appendicitis decreased by 14.6%; reasons for this decline are unknown. A life table model suggests that the lifetime risk of appendicitis is 8.6% for males and 6.7% for females; the lifetime risk of appendectomy is 12.0% for males and 23.1% for females. Overall, an estimated 36 incidental procedures are performed to prevent one case of appendicitis; for the elderly, the preventive value of an incidental procedure is considerably lower.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Randomized, single-blinded trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: effects on postoperative analgesia.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of laparoscopy to patients has been clearly established in adults undergoing cholecystectomy. Results are less clear for appendectomy. The current study was undertaken to compare the respective 3-day postoperative periods after laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children. METHODS: Sixty-three children (aged 8-15 yr) scheduled for appendectomy were randomly assigned to two groups: open and laparoscopic. Postoperative evaluation included delay of postoperative recovery (walking and feeding), pain assessment by visual analog scale during the 3 subsequent days, amount of nalbuphine administered via a patient-controlled analgesia system during the first 48 h and responses by children, parents, and nurses on the overall quality of analgesia. RESULTS: There was no difference between groups for demographic data (particularly macroscopic aspect of appendix) analgesia, sedation, delay before eating and walking, incidence of urinary retention, nausea, vomiting. Operative time was long (P < or = to 0.05) in the laparoscopic group (54 +/- 17 min) than in the open group (39 +/- 18 min). Thirty five percent of the children had pain at the shoulder in the LAP group versus ten percent in the open group (P < or = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy did not improve analgesia and postoperative recovery after appendectomy in children.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1978

Abdominal drainage following appendectomy and cholecystectomy.

Consecutive patients undergoing emergency appendectomy (283) or urgent cholecystectomy (51) were prospectively studied for the development of post-operative incisional or peritoneal sepsis. Severity of the original peritoneal infection was carefully recorded, while use of a Penrose dam to drain the peritoneum was randomized according to pre-assigned hospital number. Both aerobic and anaerobic cultures were taken from the abdomen at the time of operation as well as from all postoperative infectious foci. Results demonstrated no essential differences in incidence of wound and peritoneal infection following appendectomy for simple or suppurative appendicitis (187) or following cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (51). However, with gangrenous or perforative appendicitis (94), incisional and intra-abdominal infection rates were 43% and 45%, respectively, when a drain was used; yet only 29 and 13%, respectively, without a drain. These latter differences were significant (p < 0.001). In addition, intra-abdominal abscesses were three times as likely to drain through the incision than along any tract provided by the rubber conduit. Cultures revealed that hospital pathogens accounted for a greater proportion of wound and peritoneal sepsis after cholecystectomy and appendectomy for simple or suppurative appendicitis if a drain had been inserted than if managed otherwise. By contrast, a mixed bacterial flora was responsible for most infections following appendectomy for gangrenous or perforated appendicitis, irrespective as to use of a drain.

Abdomen↗
PubMed1992

Laparoscopic appendectomy. Initial experience in a teaching program.

From February 1990 to December 1991, 16 laparoscopic procedures were performed for right lower quadrant pain. There were nine men and seven women, aged 16 to 47 years (mean, 27.2 years). All procedures were performed by surgical chief residents with prior experience in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, first-assisted by an attending surgeon. The appendix was visualized and a definitive diagnosis was made in all patients. One patient with acute salpingitis underwent diagnostic laparoscopy only; two patients underwent laparotomy (perforated appendicitis, perforated diverticulitis). A fourth patient had an acute torsion of an ovarian cyst managed laparoscopically. Laparoscopic appendectomy was successfully performed in 12 patients (acute appendicitis, 9; fibrosis or chronic inflammation, 2; normal appendix, 1). Mean operative time for laparoscopic appendectomy was 95.7 minutes, and mean postoperative stay was 2.5 days. The authors conclude that operative time, diagnostic accuracy, and complication rates for laparoscopic appendectomy are acceptable. Within the context of a training program, laparoscopic appendectomy provides an opportunity for surgical residents to expand laparoscopic skills.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1986

Wound sepsis after cholecystectomy. Influence of incidental appendectomy.

We undertook a prospective study of the effect of incidental appendectomy on the safety of cholecystectomy in patients under the age of 50 years. One hundred twenty patients were randomized to have either cholecystectomy alone or cholecystectomy and appendectomy. All patients received preoperative antibiotic cover. Both groups were well matched for age, sex, obesity, and length of hospital stay. Twelve patients were withdrawn from the trial. Wound infections occurred in three of the 56 patients in the cholecystectomy group (5.3%) and in two of the 52 patients in the cholecystectomy plus appendectomy group (3.8%). Incidental appendectomy is a safe addition to elective cholecystectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.

This prospective clinical study was done because our initial retrospective review suggested that laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) offers no significant advantages over open appendectomy (OA) yet is significantly more expensive. From July 1992 to August 1993, 57 patients were approached preoperatively for randomization to either LA (n = 19) or OA (n = 18). There were no statistically significant differences between the LA and OA groups in operative risk: mean age, 28 +/- 2 vs 26 +/- 2 years; percent female, 26% vs 22%; body mass index, 24 +/- 0.8 vs 26 +/- 1.2 kg/m2. All patients were either ASA class I or class II, 78% in each group being class II. The differences between the LA and OA groups in mean operating time required (93 +/- 12 vs 87 +/- 8 minutes), postoperative intramuscular narcotic analgesic usage (24 +/- 6 vs 26 +/- 6 hours), postoperative hospital stay (57 +/- 12 vs 66 +/- 10 hours), and return to normal activity (20 +/- 6 vs 14 +/- 3 days) were also not significant. However, LA was much more expensive because of higher operating room charges. The mean total hospital bill was $4,600 +/- $160 for the LA group and $1,700 +/- $70 for the OA group. This prospective study corroborated our previous analysis. Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe, effective, and expensive and overall has no greatly significant advantages over open appendectomy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Routine appendectomy in epithelial ovarian carcinoma: is it necessary?

OBJECTIVE: To detect risk factors for the appendiceal metastasis and to define the role of routine appendectomy in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: A total of 285 patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma who had undergone primary cytoreductive surgery including appendectomy were retrospectively evaluated. Appendiceal involvement was divided into 2 groups: gross and microscopic. Clinicopathologic variables were evaluated for possible significance in terms of appendiceal metastasis. A second analysis was performed using the same variables to detect a possible relation with microscopic metastasis. In a subgroup analysis, we also analyzed the role of routine appendectomy in patients with clinically early stage disease. RESULTS: One-hundred six patients were found to have appendiceal metastasis (37%). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed stage of disease as the unique factor determining the appendiceal metastasis (P < .001). Five patients with apparently stage I-II disease were upstaged due to isolated appendiceal metastasis (4.9%). In the second analysis excluding the patients with gross involvement, ascites was an independent predictor of microscopic involvement (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Routine appendectomy is indicated in all epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients as part of the initial surgical staging procedure because of a considerable rate of upstaging in early stage disease and optimal cytoreduction in advanced stages. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis?

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether delayed surgical intervention in adult patients with acute appendicitis is safe by correlating the interval from onset of symptoms to operation (total interval) with the degree of pathology and incidence of postoperative complications. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Prompt appendectomy has long been the standard of care for acute appendicitis because of the risk of progression to advanced pathology. This time-honored practice has been recently challenged by studies in pediatric patients, which suggested that acute appendicitis can be managed in an elective manner once antibiotic therapy is initiated. No such data are available in adult patients with acute appendicitis. METHODS: A retrospective review of 1081 patients who underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis between 1998 and 2004 was conducted. The following parameters were monitored and correlated: demographics, time from onset of symptoms to arrival at the emergency room (patient interval) and from arrival to the emergency room to the operating room (hospital interval), physical, computed tomography (CT scan) and pathologic findings, complications, length of stay, and length of antibiotic treatment. Pathologic state was graded 1 (G1) for acute appendicitis, 2 (G2) for gangrenous acute appendicitis, 3 (G3) for perforation or phlegmon, and 4 (G4) for a periappendicular abscess. RESULTS: The risk of advanced pathology, defined as a higher pathology grade, increased with the total interval. When this interval was <12 hours, the risk of developing G1, G2, G3, and G4, was 94%, 0%, 3%, and 3%, respectively. These values changed to 60%, 7%, 27%, and 6%, respectively, when the total interval was 48 to 71 hours and to 54%, 7%, 26%, and 13% for longer than 71 hours. The odds for progressive pathology was 13 times higher for the total interval >71 hours group compared with total interval<12 hours (95% confidence interval = 4.7-37.1). Although both prolonged patient and hospital intervals were associated with advanced pathology, prehospital delays were more profoundly related to worsening pathology compared with in-hospital delays (P < 0.001). Advanced pathology was associated with tenderness to palpation beyond the right lower quadrant (P < 0.001), guarding (P < 0.001), rebound (P < 0.001), and CT scan findings of peritoneal fluid (P = 0.01), fecalith (P = 0.01), dilation of the appendix (P < 0.001), and perforation (P < 0.001). Increased length of hospital stay (P < 0.001) and antibiotic treatment (P < 0.001) as well as postoperative complications (P < 0.001) also correlated with progressive pathology. CONCLUSION: In adult patients with acute appendicitis, the risk of developing advanced pathology and postoperative complications increases with time; therefore, delayed appendectomy is unsafe. As delays in seeking medical help are difficult to control, prompt appendectomy is mandatory. Because these conclusions are derived from retrospective data, a prospective study is required to confirm their validity.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

An "all 5-mm ports" selective approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and anti-reflux surgery.

Laparoscopic appendectomy, cholecystectomy, or anti-reflux procedures are conventionally performed with the use of one and often two 10/12-mm ports. While needlescopic or micropuncture laparoscopic procedures reduce postoperative pain, they invariably involve the use of one 10/12-mm port and the instruments applied have their ergo-dynamic shortcomings. Between September 2002 and March 2003, we have attempted an "all 5-mm ports" approach in 49 laparoscopic procedures, which included 18 of 59 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (31%), 26 diagnostic laparoscopies for suspected appendicitis (of which we proceeded to a laparoscopic appendectomy in 17 patients), and in the last 5 of 9 laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications. Conversion of one of the 5-mm ports to a 10-mm port was required in 5 of the 18 (28%) laparoscopic cholecystectomies and in 6 of the 17 (35%) laparoscopic appendectomies to facilitate organ retrieval in patients with large gallstones (>5 mm in diameter) and in obese patients with fatty mesoappendix. There were no conversions to open surgery. No significant differences in the operating time between the laparoscopic procedures performed by the all 5-mm ports approach or the conventional approach were observed. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred in this series. The "all 5-mm ports" approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy in selected patients and to laparoscopic fundoplication appears feasible and safe. A randomised comparison between this approach and the conventional laparoscopic approach to elective cholecystectomy and fundoplication in which two of the ports employed are of the 10-mm diameter is warranted.

Appendectomy↗
PubMed2002

Cigarette smoking, appendectomy, and tonsillectomy as risk factors for the development of primary sclerosing cholangitis: a case control study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The strong clinical association between primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and ulcerative colitis (UC) suggests common factors in their pathogenesis. Smoking, previous appendectomy, and tonsillectomy have been associated with a decreased risk of developing UC. In this study, our aim was to examine these risk factors in patients with PSC with and without underlying inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: The smoking habits and history of previous appendectomy and/or tonsillectomy of 170 patients with PSC, 41 without underlying IBD, 170 patients with UC but normal liver function tests, and 170 age and sex matched community controls were obtained by questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 112 PSC patients (66%) had never smoked compared with 66 controls (39%). Only 12 PSC patients (7%) were current smokers versus 43 controls (25%). The resultant odds ratio of having PSC was 0.17 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.35) among current smokers and 0.33 (95% CI 0.21-0.52) among ever (former+current) smokers. Among former smokers, the odds of having PSC were also significantly decreased (odds ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.26-0.73; p<0.05). In the subgroup of PSC patients without IBD, only 5% were current smokers versus 26% of matched controls, and never smokers were overrepresented (68% v 37%). The rate of previous appendectomy was similar in all three study groups (14%, 12%, and 13%) but the frequency of tonsillectomy was reduced in the PSC group (21% v 31%; p=0.05). CONCLUSION: PSC, like UC, is a disease of non-smokers as the odds of having PSC was significantly decreased among current and former smokers. The association between non-smoking and PSC was independent of whether the PSC patient had underlying IBD. Previous tonsillectomy but not appendectomy may also be associated with a decreased risk of PSC but this warrants further study.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Is incidental appendectomy necessary during radical cystectomy?

OBJECTIVE: To find out the incidence of acute appendicitis leading to acute abdominal pain and necessitating appendectomy in the follow-up of patients after radical cystectomy and urinary diversions. METHODS: A prospective 160 consecutive radical cystectomy patients with urinary diversion in whom appendectomy was not done between January 1991 and June 2001 were reviewed for the incidence of acute appendicitis. Ages ranged between 26 and 73 years. There were 143 males and 17 females. 120 patients had ileal conduit, 20 sigmoid neobladder, 5 continent urinary diversion, and 15 ureterosigmoidostomy as urinary diversion. Each patients was followed up regularly till death or last follow-up. The follow-up ranged between 4 months and 10 years (mean 6 years). RESULTS: Intestinal obstruction (11%) and acute pyelonephritis (16%) were the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. The remaining causes include sigmoid neobladder perforation (0.6%), parastomal hernia (0.6%), urinary retention due to mucus (1.8%) and renal colic (1.8%). In all patients, diagnosis was easily made and they were managed accordingly. None of the patients had acute appendicitis requiring appendectomy on follow-up. CONCLUSION: Incidental appendectomy is not required during radical cystectomy as the risk of subsequent appendicitis is extremely low.

Adult↗