Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “μ-opioid receptor biased agonists”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

277 records · Page 16Linked to original sources
PubMed2026

Intismeran Autogene Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Pembrolizumab Alone in High-Risk Resected Melanoma: 5-Year Update of the Randomized Phase IIb KEYNOTE-942 Study.

Intismeran autogene (intismeran; formerly V940 or mRNA-4157) is an mRNA-based individualized neoantigen therapy. We report 5-year outcomes of intismeran plus pembrolizumab from the phase IIb KEYNOTE-942 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03897881). Eligible patients with resected stage IIIB to IV cutaneous melanoma were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive nine doses of intramuscular intismeran 1 mg once every 3 weeks plus 18 doses of intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks or 18 doses of intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was recurrence-free survival (RFS); secondary end points included distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and safety. Five-year analyses were descriptive. Among 157 randomly assigned patients (intismeran plus pembrolizumab, n = 107; pembrolizumab, n = 50), the median planned follow-up at data cutoff (December 15, 2025) was 60.3 (range, 50.5-76.4) months. Intismeran plus pembrolizumab continued to prolong RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.510 [95% CI, 0.294 to 0.887) and DMFS (HR, 0.411 [95% CI, 0.200 to 0.843]), with a favorable trend in overall survival (HR, 0.471 [95% CI, 0.165 to 1.345]) versus pembrolizumab. Safety profile continued to be manageable, with no new safety signals. Intismeran plus pembrolizumab was associated with increased T-cell receptor clonality and novel clonotypes versus pembrolizumab; greater novel clone expansion was observed in patients without versus with recurrence in the combination arm. After a 5-year follow-up, intismeran plus pembrolizumab demonstrated sustained, durable treatment benefits versus pembrolizumab alone in resected high-risk melanoma.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Metabolomic Signatures of Inflammation in Chronic Kidney Disease.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Inflammation is associated with adverse kidney, cardiovascular, and mortality outcomes. Investigation of the metabolic milieu as it relates to inflammation may provide important insights into these disease processes. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK), Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, and Boston Kidney Biopsy Cohort (BKBC) participants with available metabolomics and inflammatory protein data. PREDICTORS: Baseline blood levels of 718 metabolites. OUTCOMES: Baseline and longitudinal changes in blood levels of tumor necrosis factor receptors 1 and 2 (TNFR1, TNFR2), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), interleukins 6, 8, and 10 (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10), uromodulin (UMOD), and epidermal growth factor (EGF). ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Multivariable linear regression and linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Among 491 AASK participants (mean age 54 years; 37% women; mean glomerular filtration rate, 45 mL/min/1.73 m2), 367 cross-sectional associations between metabolites and inflammatory proteins were significant after correction for multiple comparisons. The direction of association was mostly positive for TNFR1 (97%), TNFR2 (97%), IL-8 (77%), and IL-10 (100%); negative for UMOD (80%) and EGF (97%); and variable for TNF-⍺, IFN-γ, and IL-6. Pathways were distinct for several inflammatory proteins (eg, tryptophan metabolism for TNFR2). Forty-five associations between metabolites and longitudinal change in inflammatory proteins were identified. Notable metabolites included tigylcarnitine and N 2,N 5-diacetylornithine, which were associated with 2-year increases in TNFR1 and/or TNFR2, and 1,5-anhydroglucitol, where lower levels were associated with decreases in UMOD. In ARIC (n = 3,773) and BKBC (n = 413), replication of cross-sectional associations was excellent for TNFR1 (ARIC 83%; BKBC 85%) and TNFR2 (ARIC 64%; BKBC 79%) but poor for IL-8 (ARIC 3%; BKBC 3%). LIMITATIONS: Metabolite data limited to baseline visit; potential for residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Using an untargeted approach, multiple metabolites were cross-sectionally and longitudinally associated with inflammatory proteins in persons with chronic kidney disease.

Chronic kidney disease↗
PubMed2026

Multicenter randomized effectiveness/implementation trial of a digital self-management support tool to improve the quality of life during adjuvant hormonal therapy for patients with early breast cancer: The HOPE trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive early breast cancer (BC), adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) represents the cornerstone of treatment. However, 75% of patients experience ET-related symptoms that negatively affect their quality of life (QOL). Despite their high prevalence, these symptoms are often underestimated and under-addressed during consultations. As a result, non-adherence to ET is common and remains a major barrier for optimal disease and survival outcomes. METHODS: National, prospective, randomized, open-label hybrid type 1 effectiveness/implementation trial conducted in France comparing a personalized digital health pathway plus standard of care (SoC) vs. SoC alone in patients with HR+ early BC reporting ET-related symptoms. 180 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either 12 weeks of the digital health pathway or 12 weeks of SoC. The intervention is anchored by the Resilience© digital companion including remote symptom and needs assessment, an introductory nurse-navigator phone call, and access to personalized, symptom-specific online educational and self-management programs (physical activity, yoga, meditation or cognitive behavioral therapy). In both arms, patients will be invited to wear a wearable device to objectively monitor behavioral parameters. The primary endpoint is the ET symptoms scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-BR45 over 12-weeks. Secondary endpoints include other QOL domains, self-reported ET adherence, eHealth literacy, self-efficacy, and evaluation of the implementation process. DISCUSSION: This study should provide evidence on the effectiveness and real-world implementation of a personalized digital health pathway to improve QOL in patients experiencing ET-related symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06781996; Protocol version 3.0.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Ablative radiotherapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To prove the oncological benefit of ablative radiotherapy in patients with up to five metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) a single-centre randomised trial was initiated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This monocentric, randomised, phase II clinical trial enrolled patients with up to five prostate-specific membrane antigen-positive bone or lymph node metastases developing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression during androgen deprivation (ADT) or ADT and androgen-receptor targeted therapy. Participants were randomised (2:1) to receive metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) or observation (OBS) without changing systemic therapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients having PSA progression within 1 year, with statistical analyses conducted using intention-to-treat principles. Here, results of a planned interim analysis of the primary endpoint are reported. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients (12 in the observation arm and 18 in the MDT arm) were enrolled, PSA progression within 1 year occurred in 44% of the MDT group vs 75% in the OBS group (P = 0.14, not significant). The median time to PSA progression was significantly longer in the MDT arm (12.4 months) compared to the OBS arm (2.9 months, P = 0.03). The pre-defined criteria to discontinue the study were not met. Limitations include the single-centre design and small sample size at interim analysis. CONCLUSION: This pre-planned interim analysis of the primary endpoint did not meet the discontinuation criteria of the study protocol, suggesting that MDT in oligometastatic CRPC may extend the time to PSA progression without immediate change of systemic therapy. The continuation of the study in a multicentre setting is planned (Institutional funding by the TU Dresden, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04141709).

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Proteomic and phosphoproteomic profiles of time-dependent dynamic changes in LPS-induced macrophage polarization.

The temporal proteomic and phosphoproteomic reprogramming during early M1 macrophage polarization (0-6 h) remains poorly understood. We performed time-resolved proteomic and phosphoproteomic analyses of LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages at seven time points within 6 h. Time-clustering of differentially expressed molecules revealed two patterns: initial change with partial recovery, and sustained dysregulation. Upregulated proteins and phosphorylation sites were enriched in the Rho GTPase signaling pathway, T-cell receptor signaling pathway, NF-κB cascade, osteoclast differentiation pathway, and antiviral immune pathway. Downregulated pathways were associated with cell cycle regulation, chromatin remodeling, RNA metabolism, and mRNA processing, indicating resource reallocation to prioritize acute inflammatory responses. Kinase-substrate network analysis confirmed the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK), protein kinase B (AKT), and ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) families as core upstream phosphorylation regulators. Integrated analysis revealed synergistic and antagonistic relationships between proteomic and phosphoproteomic changes. This study provides a temporal molecular atlas of M1 polarization, delineating inflammatory signaling dynamics and offering a basis for therapeutic target discovery in inflammatory diseases. SIGNIFICANCE: Macrophage M1 polarization is a central event in innate immune defense against pathogenic invasion, yet its dysregulation is a pivotal driver of the onset and progression of a broad spectrum of inflammation-associated disorders, spanning autoimmune diseases, infectious conditions and inflammatory bone diseases, making the dissection of its molecular regulatory mechanisms an urgent research priority in immunology and translational medicine. Dynamic molecular events within 0-6 h after LPS stimulation are critical for initiating and shaping M1 inflammatory activation, yet systematic time-resolved proteomic and phosphoproteomic profiling remains insufficient.In this study, we comprehensively characterized temporal proteome and phosphoproteome changes at seven consecutive time points during macrophage polarization, clarified two distinct dynamic molecular patterns, identified core signaling pathways and key kinase regulators involved in inflammatory reprogramming, and uncovered the leading role of post-translational phosphorylation modifications in initiating polarization. This work delineates the time-series molecular atlas of early macrophage activation, provides novel insights into the temporal regulatory mechanism of inflammatory signaling networks, and lays a solid experimental foundation for exploring new intervention targets and regulatory nodes in clinical translational research.

Lipopolysaccharides↗
PubMed2026

Transdermal 17β-Estradiol for the Treatment of COVID-19: Protocol of an Early Terminated Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Early epidemiological studies suggested that pre- and postmenopausal women receiving estrogen therapy were less likely to develop severe disease or die from COVID-19 infection. Potential mechanisms include estrogen-mediated immunomodulation and 17β-estradiol-induced downregulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme type 2 (ACE2), the cellular receptor for SARS-CoV-2. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of transdermal 17β-estradiol as an adjunctive treatment for COVID-19 in men and postmenopausal women. METHODS: We designed and conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing 17β-estradiol transdermal gel plus standard care with standard care alone in adults with confirmed COVID-19. Initial ethics and funding approvals were obtained in March 2021. Owing to changes in the epidemiology of COVID-19 in Qatar and revisions to national quarantine policies, protocol amendments were required before recruitment commenced in February 2022. The treatment duration was reduced from 10 to 7 days due to changes in national quarantine guidelines. Recruitment and follow-up were conducted between February 2022 and June 2022. RESULTS: Recruitment was substantially lower than anticipated because widespread COVID-19 vaccination, declining disease severity, and revised national quarantine policies markedly reduced the number of eligible hospitalized patients. Consequently, the planned sample size was not achieved, and the study was terminated in June 2022. A total of 29 men with mild COVID-19 were enrolled, with 44.8% (n=13) randomized to standard care and 55.2% (n=16) to transdermal 17β-estradiol plus standard care. The intervention was well tolerated, with no adverse safety signals or thromboembolic events reported. CONCLUSIONS: Although the study was underpowered to assess efficacy because recruitment targets were not achieved, it showed that transdermal 17β-estradiol was well tolerated, with no major safety concerns among enrolled participants. The experience also provided important operational lessons for conducting clinical trials during rapidly evolving pandemics. Adequately powered studies are required to determine whether transdermal estrogen has therapeutic potential against COVID-19, other ACE2-mediated coronavirus infections, or potentially other severe viral illnesses.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Ibuprofen versus acetaminophen for acute mild-to-moderate pain management in pediatric populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of their efficacy.

UNLABELLED: Ibuprofen and acetaminophen are the most widely used analgesics in pediatric practice for the management of acute mild-to-moderate pain. Despite their widespread use, the comparative analgesic efficacy of these two agents in children remains a subject of ongoing debate, with existing evidence largely derived from heterogeneous clinical settings and small individual trials. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials comparing the analgesic efficacy of ibuprofen versus acetaminophen in pediatric populations with acute mild-to-moderate pain. A systematic literature search was conducted up to May 2026 in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The review was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-Children and Adolescents (PRISMA-C) 2026 reporting guideline. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials comparing ibuprofen with acetaminophen in children and adolescents (defined as individuals aged 0 to&#x2009;<&#x2009;18&#xa0;years) with acute pain, reporting at least one extractable efficacy outcome. Continuous outcomes were synthesized as standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) using random-effects models; dichotomous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. Eight randomized controlled trials enrolling 1325 participants were included. Three pediatric trials contributed to the primary continuous pain outcome meta-analysis (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;196 analyzable participants), yielding a pooled SMD of&#x2009;-&#x2009;0.28 (95% CI&#x2009;-&#x2009;0.57 to 0.00; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.052; I2&#x2009;=&#x2009;0%), indicating a small effect favoring ibuprofen that did not reach conventional statistical significance. Given the small number of contributing studies (k&#x2009;=&#x2009;3), the I2 statistic should be interpreted with caution as it has limited power to detect heterogeneity in this context. For the dichotomous pain freedom outcome (2 trials, n&#x2009;=&#x2009;114), no significant difference was observed (pooled RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.53-1.99; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.93; I2&#x2009;=&#x2009;0%). A prespecified sensitivity analysis including an adult soft-tissue injury trial attenuated the pooled effect toward the null (SMD&#x2009;-&#x2009;0.15, 95% CI&#x2009;-&#x2009;0.38 to 0.09; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.23; I2&#x2009;=&#x2009;36.6%). Narrative synthesis of additional studies generally demonstrated comparable analgesic efficacy between the two agents across postoperative and outpatient pediatric settings. The overall certainty of evidence was rated as low for both primary outcomes, primarily due to imprecision and indirectness. CONCLUSION: Current evidence from randomized controlled trials does not demonstrate a superiority of ibuprofen over acetaminophen for acute mild-to-moderate pain management in children. Both agents appear to provide clinically meaningful analgesia across heterogeneous pediatric pain settings. The clinical choice between agents should be guided by individual patient factors, including contraindications to NSAIDs, the inflammatory nature of the pain etiology, and patient-specific characteristics. The low certainty of evidence underscores the need for adequately powered, methodologically rigorous trials to definitively establish the comparative efficacy of these two analgesics in the pediatric population. WHAT IS KNOWN: &#x2022; Ibuprofen and acetaminophen are the two most widely used non-opioid analgesics for acute mild-to-moderate pain in children, and both are recommended as first-line agents by major international guidelines. &#x2022; Prior meta-analyses in mixed pediatric-adult populations have suggested a modest analgesic advantage of ibuprofen over acetaminophen, but pediatric-specific evidence has remained limited and methodologically heterogeneous. WHAT IS NEW: &#x2022; This systematic review and meta-analysis, restricted to randomized controlled trials in pediatric populations, found that ibuprofen showed a small effect favoring pain reduction compared with acetaminophen (SMD&#x2009;-&#x2009;0.28, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.052), although this did not reach conventional statistical significance. &#x2022; The analgesic advantage of ibuprofen may be more pronounced in pain etiologies with a significant inflammatory component (e.g., fractures). At the same time, both agents appear broadly equivalent in most other acute pediatric pain settings, supporting individualized analgesic selection based on clinical context and patient-specific factors.

Humans↗