Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Zonisamide”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Anticonvulsant-induced suppression of IFN-gamma production by lymphocytes obtained from cervical lymph nodes in glioma-bearing mice.

It is well known that phenytoin can cause impairment of cellular immunity. The authors investigated the potential role of other anticonvulsant drugs in the development of antitumor immunity in murine malignant glioma models. The survival rate was determined in murine glioma models using syngeneic 203 glioma cells following treatment with four anticonvulsants, which are most commonly administered to glioma patients, i.e., phenytoin, phenobarbital, valproate and zonisamide. In a second set of experiments, we further examined the effect of these drugs on interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) secretion by lymphocytes prepared from cervical lymph nodes (CLN) in the same models. The IFN-gamma production of CLN lymphocytes as measured by ELISA method was markedly impaired in the early stage of tumor-bearing mice treated with phenytoin or zonisamide, and the median survival time (MST) of controls and of mice treated with either phenytoin or zonisamide was 13, 10 and 11 days, respectively, which was not a statistically significant difference. Phenobarbital and valproate did not affect either IFN-gamma production or their survival rate. In addition, immunohistochemistry showed a reduction in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes containing CD4 and CD8 antigens in the mice treated with phenytoin and zonisamide. Two anticonvulsants, phenytoin and zonisamide, showed a significant inhibitory effect on IFN-gamma production by CLN lymphocytes in murine glioma models, although there was no statistically significant difference in MST between controls and the anticonvulsant-treated mice. These drugs might have some detrimental influence on the prognosis of brain tumor patients when combined with the latent immune dysfunction accompanying the tumor-bearing state.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Binding of sulfonamides to erythrocyte proteins and possible drug-drug interaction.

The mode of binding of sulfonamides to erythrocyte proteins and possible drug-drug interaction between those compounds in erythrocytes resulting in changes in tissue levels were studied in rats using zonisamide (a novel antiepileptic agent possessing a sulfonamide group), several other sulfonamides and some antiepileptics without a sulfonamide group. In Michaelis-Menten plottings, the sulfonamide was found to be concentrated into erythrocytes in vitro and in vivo in a saturable high-affinity mode and in a linear low-affinity mode at ordinary therapeutic plasma levels through a simple diffusion process. Concentration in erythrocytes was affected by the presence of albumin in the extracellular medium. The cellular sulfonamide was readily replaced by extracellular sulfonamides in vitro. Even in vivo, erythrocyte levels of zonisamide were lowered by administration of other sulfonamides, although the plasma and tissue levels were not significantly changed since the plasma and tissue compartments of zonisamide were large relative to the erythrocyte compartment at ordinary therapeutic dose levels of zonisamide in animals and man. Therefore, disposition of zonisamide was not significantly influenced by other sulfonamides, but it is suggested that drug-drug interaction affecting the tissue levels may occur for a combination of sulfonamides with extremely different affinities for erythrocytes and low therapeutic plasma levels.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: inhibition of the transmembrane isozyme XIV with sulfonamides.

The inhibition of the last human carbonic anhydrase (CA, EC 4.2.1.1) isozyme (hCA XIV) discovered has been investigated with a series of sulfonamides, including some clinically used derivatives (acetazolamide, methazolamide, ethoxzolamide, dichlorophenamide, dorzolamide, brinzolamide, benzolamide, and zonisamide), as well as the sulfamate antiepileptic drug topiramate. The full-length hCA XIV is an enzyme showing a medium-low catalytic activity, quite similar to that of hCA XII, with the following kinetic parameters at 20 degrees C and pH 7.5, for the CO2 hydration reaction: k(cat) = 3.12 x 10(5) s(-1) and k(cat)/K(M) = 3.9 x 10(7) M(-1) s(-1). All types of activities have been detected for the investigated compounds, with several micromolar inhibitors, including zonisamide, topiramate, and simple sulfanilamide derivatives (K(I)-s in the range of 1.46-6.50 microM). In addition, topiramate and zonisamide were observed to behave as weak hCA XII inhibitors, while zonisamide was an effective hCA IX inhibitor (K(I) of 5.1 nM). Some benzene-1,3-disulfonamide derivatives or simple five-membered heteroaromatic sulfonamides showed K(I)-s in the range of 180-680 nM against hCA XIV, whereas the most effective of such inhibitors, including 3-chloro-/bromo-sulfanilamide, benzolamide-like, ethoxzolamide-like, and acetazolamide/methazolamide-like derivatives, showed inhibition constant in the range of 13-48 nM. The best hCA XIV inhibitor was aminobenzolamide (K(I) of 13 nM), but no CA XIV-selective derivatives were evidenced. There are important differences of affinity of these sulfonamides/sulfamates for the three transmembrane CA isozymes, with CA XII showing the highest affinity, followed by CA IX, whereas CA XIV usually showed the lowest affinity for these inhibitors.

Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors↗
PubMed2005

Anticonvulsant and neuroprotective effects of the novel nootropic agent nefiracetam on kainic acid-induced seizures in rats.

Nefiracetam is a novel pyrrolidone-type nootropic agent, and it has been reported to possess a potential for antiepileptic therapy as well as cognition-enhancing effects. We investigated the anticonvulsant and neuroprotective effects of nefiracetam in kainic acid-induced seizures of rats, compared with levetiracetam and standard antiepileptic drugs. Subcutaneous injection of kainic acid (10 mg/kg) induced typical behavioral seizures such as wet dog shakes and limbic seizures and histopathological changes in the hippocampus (degeneration and loss of pyramidal cells in CA1 to CA4 areas). Nefiracetam (25, 50 and 100 mg/kg po) had no effect on the behavioral seizures and dose-dependently inhibited the hippocampal damage. In contrast, levetiracetam, a pyrrolidone-type antiepileptic drug, inhibited neither. Valproic acid and ethosuximide prevented the hippocampal damage without attenuating the behavioral seizures as nefiracetam. Zonisamide and phenytoin did not inhibit the behavioral seizures, while zonisamide enhanced the hippocampal damage and phenytoin increased the lethality rate. Carbamazepine inhibited the behavioral seizures at 50 mg/kg and enhanced that at 100 mg/kg, and it completely inhibited the hippocampal damage at both doses. We have previously reported that anticonvulsant spectrum of nefiracetam paralleled that of zonisamide, phenytoin or carbamazepine in standard screening models. However, the pharmacological profile of nefiracetam was closer to valproic acid or ethosuximide than that of zonisamide, phenytoin or carbamazepine in this study. These results suggest that anticonvulsant spectrum and mechanism of nefiracetam are distinct from those of standard antiepileptic drugs, and nefiracetam possesses a neuroprotective effect that is unrelated to seizure inhibition.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Properties of antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsies.

Although valproate is considered to be the drug of first choice for the treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGEs), other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), both old (ethosuximide, clobazam, and clonazepam) and new (lamotrigine, levetiracetam, topiramate, and zonisamide) are also available. These AEDs do not appear to have a common mechanism of action in that both inhibitory gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA; e.g., clobazam, clonazepam, and valproate) and excitatory glutamate (e.g., lamotrigine and topiramate) mechanisms are involved. Ethosuximide primarily acts by blocking T-type voltage-gated calcium channels in thalamic neurones while topiramate and zonisamide have multiple mechanisms of action. In contrast, levetiracetam is unique in that it may act via a specific binding site in the brain. In terms of their pharmacokinetic characteristics, all eight AEDs are rapidly absorbed after oral ingestion with peak blood concentration being achieved within 1-4 hours. Bioavailability is 100% with the exception clonazepam (90%) and topiramate (81-95%). Plasma protein binding is variable with valproate (90%), clobazam (85%) and clonazepam (86%) showing substantial binding, lamotrigine (55%) and zonisamide (50%) intermediate binding, and levetiracetam (0%), ethosuximide (0%) and topiramate (10%) being minimally bound. However, the binding by zonisamide is complicated by its binding to erythrocytes as well as albumin. All AEDs, with the exception of lamotrigine and levetiracetam, undergo elimination as a result of extensive metabolism by hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes, which are highly amenable to induction and inhibition by other drugs and therefore susceptible to pharmacokinetic interactions. Lamotrigine metabolism is via hepatic glucuronidation, a process that is also susceptible to induction and inhibition by concurrent drugs. Levetiracetam is minimally metabolized (by hydrolysis in blood), is excreted predominantly unchanged in urine, and to date has not been associated with any clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions. Using a semiquantitative pharmacokinetic rating system, based on 16 pharmacokinetic characteristics, a direct comparison between AEDs is possible. Thus valproic acid, regarded as the drug of first choice in the treatment of IGEs, rates lowest with respect to favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics, mostly because of its nonlinear pharmacokinetics, extensive hepatic metabolism, and its high propensity to interact both with other AEDs and non-AEDs. Levetiracetam rates highest with topiramate in second place.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed1996

New antiepileptic drugs: a systematic review of their efficacy and tolerability.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the newly developed antiepileptic drugs gabapentin, lamotrigine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide in patients with refractory partial epilepsy. DESIGN: Systematic review of published and unpublished randomised controlled trials of add-on treatment with new antiepileptic drugs. SUBJECTS: 20 published and eight unpublished trials representing 3883 patients with refractory partial epilepsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of patients who (a) showed 50% or greater reduction in frequency of seizures (50% responders) and (b) withdrew from each study for any reason. RESULTS: Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) relative to placebo for 50% responders were 2.29 (1.53 to 3.43) for gabapentin, 2.32 (1.47 to 3.68) for lamotrigine, 3.03 (2.01 to 4.58) for tiagabine, 4.22 (2.80 to 6.35) for topiramate, 3.68 (2.45 to 5.51) for vigabatrin, and 2.47 (1.36 to 4.47) for zonisamide. Odds ratios for withdrawal were 1.36 (0.75 to 2.49) for gabapentin, 1.19 (0.79 to 1.79) for lamotrigine, 1.81 (1.21 to 2.70) for tiagabine, 2.42 (1.43 to 4.11) for topiramate, 2.58 (1.26 to 5.27) for vigabatrin, and 5.70 (1.76 to 18.49) for zonisamide. Comparing results for each drug showed that all of the 95% confidence intervals overlapped, indicating that they were not significantly different in terms of efficacy and tolerability. CONCLUSIONS: All six drugs were significantly better than placebo at reducing frequency of seizures. These results do not allow an evidence based choice between these drugs as we have no conclusive indication of differences in efficacy or tolerability.

Acetates↗
PubMed2001

Extremely high drug-reductase activity based on aldehyde oxidase in monkey liver.

Drug-reducing ability of monkey liver cytosol was examined in this study. Monkey liver cytosol exhibited significant reductase activities toward zonisamide, sulindac and imipramine N-oxide in the presence of 2-hydroxypyrimidine or benzaldehyde, an electron donor to aldehyde oxidase. These activities were abolished by inhibitors of aldehyde oxidase, such as menadione. These reductase activities in monkeys were extremely high compared to those in other animals. The zonisamide reductase activity of monkey liver cytosol was about 40-fold higher than that of the liver microsomes. It appears that the high levels of aldehyde oxidase exists in monkey liver, and zonisamide, sulindac and imipramine N-oxide are mainly reduced by this enzyme, not by cytochrome P450.

Aldehyde Oxidase↗
PubMed1998

Capillary electrophoresis for therapeutic drug monitoring of antiepileptics.

We examined the use of capillary electrophoresis for therapeutic drug monitoring of antiepileptic drugs. Micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography (MEKC) with a diode array detector simultaneously determined concentrations of zonisamide, a new type of antiepileptic drug, and phenobarbital, phenytoin and carbamazepine, typical antiepileptic drugs, in human serum. Zonisamide levels in human serum obtained by MEKC correlated well with levels obtained by high-performance liquid chromatography. The serum levels of phenobarbital, phenytoin and carbamazepine determined by MEKC were almost equal to those obtained by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. The reproducibility of separation and quantification with MEKC for intra- and inter-day assays were appropriate. This MEKC method could provide a simple and efficient therapeutic drug monitoring method for antiepileptic drugs, especially in patients treated with a combination of zonisamide and other antiepileptic drugs. MEKC may be an attractive method for therapeutic drug monitoring, because of its specificity of separation, automation of procedure, ease of method development, low cost, small aqueous buffer amounts, speed of analysis, small injection volume and high environment-directed performance.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed2004

Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy.

Successful treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsy begins with accurate seizure classification. Seizure types, such as absence, myoclonic, and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS), often can be classified based on a detailed history and inter-ictal electroencephalogram (EEG). Ideally, patients can be classified into specific epilepsy syndromes, such as childhood absence epilepsy, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), or generalized tonic-clonic seizures on awakening. Idiopathic generalized epilepsy should be distinguished from focal epilepsy with rapid secondary generalization. If this distinction is not clear after history, physical examination, and routine inter-ictal EEG, then ambulatory EEG, video EEG monitoring, or neuroimaging studies may be needed. Ethosuximide, valproate, or lamotrigine are all appropriate first-line choices in the treatment of childhood absence epilepsy. The specific medication should be chosen based on the side effect profiles, dosing formulations, and titration schedules of the medications. The available evidence best supports valproate as the first-line choice in the treatment of JME, although lamotrigine and topiramate may be appropriate choices in this setting. More data specific to JME are needed to clarify the role of medications such as levetiracetam and zonisamide in the treatment of JME. The available evidence to guide the treatment of PGTCS is limited, because most trials did not rigorously exclude patients with focal epilepsy with rapid secondary generalization. Available evidence suggests that valproate is an appropriate first-line choice for PGTCE. Lamotrigine or topiramate also may be appropriate choices. More data are needed to clarify the role of levetiracetam and zonisamide in the treatment of PGCTS. If it is unclear whether a patient has idiopathic generalized epilepsy or focal epilepsy with secondary generalization, then a broad-spectrum anticonvulsant, including valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate, should be considered. More data are needed to support the broad-spectrum efficacy of levetiracetam and zonisamide.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2005

Effect of antiepileptic drug polytherapy on crystalluria.

Urolithiasis is a rare side effect of antiepileptic drugs. To clarify the risk factors for urolithiasis induced by antiepileptic drugs, the effect of antiepileptic drug monotherapy on crystalluria was studied, and zonisamide or sulthiame therapy and alkaline urine were demonstrated to be risk factors. In the next investigation, the effect of antiepileptic drug polytherapy on crystalluria was retrospectively studied in epilepsy patients treated for more than 1 month during the last 7 years. A total of 278 urine specimens from epilepsy patients aged between 7 months and 36 years were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 12.3 years. There were 109 samples from females and 169 from males. Antiepileptic drugs administered in this study were valproate (174 urinary samples), zonisamide (139), carbamazepine (138), phenobarbital (65), phenytoin (52), acetazolamide (17), clonazepam (15), sulthiame (6), ethosuximide (6), nitrazepam (4), and clobazam (4). Epilepsy patients treated with antiepileptic drug polytherapy were frequently found to have crystalluria in patients demonstrating alkaline urine and taking acetazolamide, zonisamide (particularly with high serum levels), or many antiepileptic drugs in combination. Regular urinalysis seems to be necessary in these patients, and the evaluation for urolithiasis should be performed if persistent crystalluria is demonstrated.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Meta-analysis and indirect comparisons of levetiracetam with other second-generation antiepileptic drugs in partial epilepsy.

Few comparative clinical trials of newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with refractory partial epilepsy are available. Therefore, meta-analysis is a widely used and useful method for comparing them. Despite the limitations of indirect comparisons, and recognizing that these drugs were tested at different doses, such comparisons can be helpful to physicians making practical treatment decisions. The purposes of this study were to present newer meta-analysis results for add-on levetiracetam compared with placebo and to estimate its efficacy and tolerability compared with other new AEDs (gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, and zonisamide) in a meta-analysis using methods for making indirect comparisons. Randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of add-on therapy with levetiracetam, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, and zonisamide in patients with refractory partial epilepsy were identified in the Cochrane Library 2002. A fixed-effects model was used to estimate Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios for the responder rate (efficacy measure) and withdrawal rate (mainly tolerability measure) of levetiracetam and other new AEDs versus placebo. Because no head-to-head clinical trials comparing these new AEDs exist, adjusted indirect comparisons were then made between levetiracetam and each other AED using the meta-analysis results. At the doses tested, levetiracetam was more effective in terms of responder rate than gabapentin (odds ratio 2.64 with 95% CI 1.51-4.63) and lamotrigine (odds ratio 1.86 with 95% CI 1.04-3.34) and equally well tolerated. Levetiracetam had a significantly lower withdrawal rate than topiramate (odds ratio 0.52 with 95% CI 0.29-0.93) and oxcarbazepine (odds ratio 0.55 with 95% CI 0.33-0.92), with comparable efficacy. Although levetiracetam did not differ significantly from the other AEDs, numerical trends favoring levetiracetam were obtained in response rate and in withdrawal rate (tiagabine, zonisamide). Indirect comparisons based on meta-analysis suggest that add-on therapy with levetiracetam has a favorable responder and/or withdrawal rate relative to several AEDs in patients with partial epilepsy with doses used in clinical trials. These meta-analyses give only short-term efficacy and safety data. Comparative clinical trials and long-term studies of these agents are needed to confirm these findings.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed2003

Oligohydrosis and hyperthermia: pilot study of a novel topiramate adverse effect.

A 6-year-old boy with partial complex seizures developed recurrent episodes of hyperthermia 2 months after topiramate was introduced into his antiepilepsy drug regimen. Further investigation revealed that the febrile episodes were related to environmental temperature and physical activity. A pilocarpine iontophoresis sweat test showed that the amount of sweat produced by the child was 5% that of age-matched controls. Topiramate discontinuation resulted in the disappearance of febrile episodes and normalization of sweat quantity in repeat sweat testing. Based on this observation and the previous data on zonisamide and isolated case reports on topiramate-related hyperthermia and the effect on sweat production, topiramate was suspected of causing oligohydrosis. A pilot study was carried out involving 13 additional children and young adults (age range 1-37 years) receiving topiramate. All patients were directly questioned regarding symptoms of decreased sweating and heat intolerance, went through a pilocarpine iontophoresis sweat test, and were compared with 14 age-matched controls who went through the sweat test for unrelated reasons. Nine of the patients were found to have reduced sweat quantity on the pilocarpine iontophoresis sweat test (including index case) (mean 0.089 g/30 minutes, SD 0.082; age-matched control: mean 0.21 g/30 minutes, SD 0.06). Eight of them were children (below 16 years). However, only three patients revealed symptoms related to heat intolerance. Topiramate is most likely responsible for decreased sweat production as detected by a pilocarpine iontophoresis sweat test. The effect seems to be more significant in children than in adults. There is a discrepancy between test results and clinical symptoms. Interestingly, oligohydrosis was found to be a relatively common side effect of zonisamide. Both zonisamide and topiramate share a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor activity. The significance of oligohydrosis in hot climates should not be underestimated. Its extent, the role of sweat test prediction, and clinical significance during topiramate treatment should be further estimated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Anticonvulsants in the treatment of bipolar mania.

A series of antiepileptic drugs have been investigated in terms of their ability to treat mania (with later applications for the treatment of bipolar depression and prevention of relapses). These include divalproex, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, tiagabine, topiramate and zonisamide. Although these drugs are all antiepileptic in action, they bring about these effects by different mechanisms; in particular, their impact on GABA differs significantly. Perhaps for this reason, their impact on mania varies greatly, with double-blind significant results evident only for valproate, carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine. Only valproate and carbamazepine are approved by the US FDA for use in mania; oxcarbazepine has never been found significantly effective in large-scale studies. Of the other options, both gabapentin and topiramate failed in large-scale investigations; tiagabine failed in small sample reports. Although lamotrigine has been successful in the prevention of depression relapse in bipolar disorder, it has not been effective in treating mania. Finally, there are no findings of large scale double-blind studies on the use of levetiracetam and zonisamide. A review of the kinetics, side effects and complications of the antiepileptic drugs indicates that carbamazepine is useful, and has adverse event benefit over all other options. The potential of zonisamide awaits further testing.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed2000

The new antiepileptic drugs: pharmacological and clinical aspects.

In recent years several new drugs (oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, topiramate, gabapentin, zonisamide, tiagabine, fosphenytoin, vigabatrin and felbamate) have been added to the therapeutic armamentarium against epilepsy. Some of these represent structural modifications of pre-existing compounds, others were developed with the specific objective of modifying neurotransmitter function, and many more were found to be clinically useful even though their mode of action is unclear or differs from that originally planned. The pharmacokinetics of these drugs differ widely from one agent to another. Some (gabapentin and vigabatrin) are eliminated unchanged in urine and have little or no interaction potential; others (tiagabine, lamotrigine, topiramate, oxcarbazepine, zonisamide, felbamate) are subject to induction of metabolism by concomitant anticonvulsants; lamotrigine is vulnerable to metabolic inhibition by valproate, and felbamate is a powerful enzyme inhibitor in addition to being an inducer of the metabolism of carbamazepine and steroid oral contraceptives. All new antiepileptic drugs have been found to be effective in improving seizure control in patients with partial and secondarily generalized seizures. However, lamotrigine, topiramate, zonisamide and felbamate appear to have broader efficacy against both partial and many generalized seizure types, while vigabatrin is also valuable in the management of infantile spasms. In monotherapy studies, new drugs have not been found to be more efficacious than older agents, but some may offer limited advantages in terms of improved tolerability. On the other hand, serious toxicity restricts considerably the use of vigabatrin and felbamate. Overall, new drugs represent valuable tools in the fight against epilepsy, but because of limited experience and cost considerations their first-line use cannot be recommended in most situations.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

The role of new antiepileptic drugs.

For many years, epileptologists had few choices for treating seizures. Within the past 20 years several "new generation" antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were introduced. The most recent additions include oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, and zonisamide. New agents have been shown in clinical trials to offer similar efficacy compared with older, more established AEDs, but the new agents offer important improvements in safety. Although clinical trials to specifically measure the efficacy of the new AEDs in treating idiopathic generalized epilepsy are rare, the new agents have demonstrated efficacy in treating generalized tonic-clonic convulsions. Data for treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome indicate a clear effect with lamotrigine or topiramate and possibly some effect with zonisamide and levetiracetam. Studies of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy and absence seizures suggest that zonisamide, lamotrigine, topiramate, and levetiracetam may be effective. Each of the new AEDs is effective in controlling partial seizures. These agents may also be appropriate choices for newly diagnosed patients or those whose conditions are refractory to treatment. In clinical trials, patients who are refractory to treatment are often given escalated doses to gain effect, but higher doses also result in more adverse events and higher withdrawal rates. Generally, the higher the dose, the greater the odds of withdrawal, with the exception of levetiracetam, which is not associated with increased withdrawal rates at high doses. Newly diagnosed patients are likely to be controlled with the first therapy given to them. It is therefore important to select an agent with the best safety, efficacy, and tolerability profile possible.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed2003

Efficacy of newer anticonvulsant medications in bipolar spectrum mood disorders.

BACKGROUND: More treatment options for all phases of bipolar disorder are needed. While lithium, valproate, and carbamazepine remain the standard of care for treatment of bipolar disorder, many patients do not respond adequately to these treatments. Some new antiepileptic medications such as lamotrigine, gabapentin, topiramate, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, and zonisamide are beginning to be used to treat bipolar disorder. DATA SOURCES: Evidence for effectiveness of these novel antiepileptic drugs in treating acute mania and depression as well as in preventing the recurrence of mania and depression is reviewed. A MEDLINE search (1966-2001) was performed for clinical trials that were published in English using the keywords lamotrigine, gabapentin, topiramate, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, and zonisamide, plus the terms bipolar disorder and mania. Evidence for effectiveness of monotherapy is presented first when it is available. Data from augmentation treatment studies and open case series in which standard ratings of symptoms were employed are presented when these are the only available data. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-eight reports of the efficacy of novel antiepileptic medications in bipolar disorder are reviewed. Evidence is strongest for lamotrigine monotherapy in patients with bipolar depression, in some patients with rapid-cycling bipolar disorder, and as prophylaxis. Evidence for the efficacy of topiramate in acute and refractory mania is promising but comes predominantly from open trials. Although some very small studies have found that oxcarbazepine and zonisamide may have some effectiveness for treating mania, these data are very preliminary. Results are mixed from the 2 small open trials of tiagabine. Although gabapentin is widely used in bipolar disorder, controlled data do not support the use of gabapentin as an antimanic medication or mood stabilizer. CONCLUSION: More controlled trials are needed to assess the effectiveness of novel antiepileptic medications in bipolar disorder.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed2005

Lithium differs from anticonvulsant mood stabilizers in prefrontal cortical and accumbal dopamine release: role of 5-HT(1A) receptor agonism.

Anticonvulsant mood stabilizers, e.g., valproic acid and carbamazepine, and atypical antipsychotic drugs (APDs), e.g., clozapine, quetiapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone, have been reported to preferentially increase dopamine (DA) release in rat medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), an effect partially or fully inhibited by WAY100635, a selective 5-HT(1A) antagonist. These atypical APDs have themselves been reported to be effective mood stabilizers, although the importance of increased cortical DA release to mood stabilization has not been established. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether zonisamide, another anticonvulsant mood stabilizer, as well as lithium, a mood stabilizer without anticonvulsant properties, also increases prefrontal cortical DA release and, if so, whether this release is also inhibited by 5-HT(1A) antagonism. As with valproic acid and carbamazepine, zonisamide (12.5 and 25 mg/kg) increased DA release in the mPFC, but not the NAC, an increase abolished by WAY100635 (0.2 mg/kg). However, lithium (100 and 250 mg/kg) decreased DA release in the NAC, an effect also attenuated by WAY100635 (0.2 mg/kg). Lithium itself had no effect in the mPFC but the combination of WAY100635 (0.2 mg/kg) and lithium (100 and 250 mg/kg) markedly increased DA release in the mPFC. Furthermore, M100907 (0.1 mg/kg), a selective 5-HT(2A) antagonist, abolished this increase in DA release in the mPFC. These results indicate that not all mood-stabilizing agents but only those, which have anticonvulsant mood-stabilizing properties, increase DA release in the cortex, and that the effect is dependent upon 5-HT(1A) receptor stimulation. However, the combination of lithium and 5-HT(1A) blockade may result in excessive 5-HT(2A) receptor stimulation, relative to 5-HT(1A) receptor stimulation, both of which can increase prefrontal cortical DA release.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2002

Unverricht-Lundborg disease with cystatin B gene abnormalities.

The clinical, neurophysiologic, and genetic findings in two Japanese patients with the Unverricht-Lundborg type of progressive myoclonus epilepsy are described. The cystatin B gene of Patient 1 exhibited expansion of the dodecamer (12-mer) repeat located in the 5' region and a point mutation (G-->A mutation) in exon 2. The cystatin B gene of Patient 2 exhibited homozygous expansion of the dodecamer repeat. Both parents of Patient 2 were heterozygous carriers. The two patients had a similar clinical course, and their symptoms were similar to those of previously reported patients in Finland. They both had a good response to zonisamide and low-dose primidone. We recommend that zonisamide and low-dose primidone should be introduced as the first drugs of choice for the treatment of patients with the Unverricht-Lundborg type of progressive myoclonus epilepsy.

Adolescent↗