Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Transplants”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15Linked to original sources

Quantitative Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serology in lung transplant recipients with primary EBV infection and/or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease.

The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific antibody response was studied in lung transplant patients to assess their value in the diagnosis and prognosis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. Recently developed synthetic peptides representing Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen-1 (EBNA-1), diffuse early antigen (EA(D)), and virus capsid antigen (VCA) were studied in a semiquantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to study antibody patterns in 12 seronegative lung transplant patients, of whom four developed a post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, and seven seropositive lung transplant patients, all of whom developed a post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. Immunoblot technique was used as a control. All 12 EBV-seronegative patients had a very limited antibody response that was restricted mainly to VCA antibodies. EA(D) antibodies became detectable in only two patients. Antibody response never preceded clinical diagnosis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in the four EBV-seronegative patients who developed post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. In the seven seropositive lung transplant patients with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, we found a rise in antibody titer in only two patients. Immunoblot analysis confirmed the serological results. In conclusion, EBV-specific antibody patterns after lung transplantation are highly restricted and variable and of limited value for the diagnosis or prognosis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease.

Adolescent↗

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus: risk factors, frequency of transplant rejections, and long-term prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Estimates of the incidence of new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation vary between 2% and 54%. It was the aim of the present trial to study the prevalence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (DM), the risk factors, the frequency of transplant rejections, and the long-term prognosis. METHODS: We studied all consecutive patients with endstage renal disease, but without DM who received kidney transplantation at our center since 1992 (n = 253; age, 52.2 +/- 12.6 years; body mass index, 22.0 +/- 7.9 kg/m2). Follow up was 3.3 +/- 1.6 years (range, 0.1-17.7) years. RESULTS: In total, 43/253 patients (17%) developed new-onset DM after transplantation. Patients with new-onset diabetes were significantly older (58.3 +/- 11.4 vs 50.9 +/- 12.5 years; P < 0.01) and had a tendency to a higher body mass index (24.0 +/- 8.5 vs 21.6 +/- 7.8 kg/m2; P = 0.077). There were no differences between the groups in respect of blood pressure control (137.7 +/- 19.0/81.8 +/- 14.2 vs 137.1 +/- 21.9/83.9 +/- 13.1 mmHg; P = 0.89/0.39), glomerular filtration rate (58.0 +/- 28.1 vs 64.1 +/- 22.1 ml/min per 1.73 m2; P = 0.13), steroid dosage (4.5 +/- 1.2 [n = 21] vs 4.6 +/- 2.2 [n = 135] mg/day; P = 0.13), or the frequency and dosage of immunosuppressive drugs such as cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and sirolimus during the follow up. However, more patients with post-transplant diabetes received steroids (83.7% vs 64.3%; P = 0.021) and azathioprine (41.9% vs 24.3%; P = 0.030). Patients with new-onset diabetes had higher serum creatinine values (163.4 +/- 67.9 vs 138.7 +/- 59.5 micromol/l; P = 0.017). The mean hemoglobin (Hb)A1c in patients with DM was 6.28 +/- 1.29% (Tosho HPLC; mean normal, 5.15%). In 18 patients (7.1%) transplant rejections occurred (16 patients without DM [7.6%] vs 2 patients with new-onset DM [4.7%]; P = 0.39). On performing multivariate analysis, the only parameter found to be associated with new-onset DM was the body mass index (R2 = 0.05; beta = 0.23; P = 0.02), and the only factor associated with transplant rejection was fasting blood glucose (R2 = 0.07; beta = 0.28; P = 0.02). None of the other parameters included in the models (age, duration after transplantation, diabetes duration, immunosuppressive therapy, HbA1c, HLA mismatches) showed any associations. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of new-onset DM after renal transplantation was 17%. The most important parameter associated with new-onset diabetes was a higher body mass index, and the most important parameter associated with transplant rejection was an elevated fasting blood glucose level. To prevent transplant rejections and to improve patients' outcome, in addition to providing optimal immunosuppressive therapy and HLA matching, good blood pressure control and HbA1c, but also near normal fasting blood glucose levels, should be achieved.

Aged↗

Incidence and severity of transplant coronary artery disease early and up to 15 years after transplantation as detected by intravascular ultrasound.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to quantify the severity of transplant coronary artery disease and to assess lesion characteristics early and up to 15 years after heart transplantation by using intracoronary ultrasound. BACKGROUND: Intravascular ultrasound has the ability to measure the components of the arterial wall and has been shown to be a sensitive method for detection of transplant coronary artery disease. METHODS: A total of 304 intracoronary ultrasound studies were performed in 174 heart transplant recipients at baseline and up to 15 (mean 3.3 +/- 0.2) years after transplantation. Mean intimal thickness and an intimal index were calculated, and lesion characteristics (eccentricity, calcification) were assessed for all coronary sites imaged (mean 3.0 +/- 0.1 sites/study). The Stanford classification was used to grade lesion severity. RESULTS: Compared with findings in patients studied at baseline (< 2 months after transplantation, n = 50), mean intimal thickness (0.09 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.16 +/- 0.02 mm, p < 0.01), intimal index (0.07 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.14 +/- 0.02, p < 0.01) and mean severity class (1.5 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.3 +/- 0.2, p < 0.01) were significantly higher at year 1 (n = 52) after transplantation. Thereafter, all three variables further increased over time and reached highest values between years 5 and 15. Calcification of lesions was detected in 2% to 12% of studies up to 5 years after transplantation, with a significant increase to 24% at years 6 to 10 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Severity of transplant coronary artery disease appeared to progress with time after transplantation in this cross-sectional study. This characteristic was most prominent during the 1st 2 years after transplantation, whereas calcification of plaques occurred to a significant extent only later in the process. These data may serve as a reference for comparison of intravascular ultrasound findings in other studies of patients with transplant coronary artery disease.

Adult↗

Transplant Friends: an interactive education program for patients awaiting kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Organ transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage renal disease. Renal transplant recipients are surviving longer with a better quality of life. Although many hospitals have transplant education programs in place, transplant patients indicate that there is a need for additional information. Transplant Friends is a program designed to meet these needs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: At the University of Alberta, 128 patients attended the Transplant Friends program between September 2002 and February 2003. Each patient completed an evaluation form consisting of 15 questions designed to evaluate patient's satisfaction regarding session content, ease of scheduling, and the sessions facilitators. Responses were recorded using 5-point Likert scales. RESULTS: All 128 participants completed the questionnaires. The predominantly male (59.1%) and Caucasian (91.6%) population had a median age of 49.1 years. Of the 128 patients, 110 patients (86%) felt that the content of the program met or exceeded their expectations; 120 patients (94%) felt the program facilitators met or exceeded their expectations; and 113 patients (88%) evaluated the scheduling favorably. CONCLUSION: Patients require complete information prior to renal transplantation to make an informed decision about whether to proceed with transplant as well as to enhance the overall transplant experience. Patients evaluated the Transplant Friends program as successfully meeting these needs through a comprehensive interactive teaching program. We recommend that institutions performing renal transplants incorporate an educational program such as Transplant Friends during the workup process of this unique patient population.

Alberta↗

Treatment of hyperlipidemia after heart transplantation and rationale for the Heart Transplant Lipid Registry.

Hyperlipidemia occurs frequently after heart transplantation, and accelerated coronary artery disease remains the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who survive more than 1 year after heart transplantation. However, the risks and benefits of lipid-lowering therapy after heart transplantation remain poorly defined, and national guidelines for lipid-lowering drug therapy do not specifically address treatment of dyslipidemia in transplant recipients. Since the initial reports in the 1980s of rhabdomyolysis in heart transplant patients receiving high-dosage lovastatin, results of 11 post-transplantation series that used lovastatin, simvastatin, or pravastatin at lower dosages as drug monotherapy have been published. These studies have shown an overall 1% incidence of rhabdomyolysis, defined as creatine kinase > 10 times the upper limit of normal plus muscle symptoms. One randomized, controlled prospective trial has investigated the effects of lipid-lowering pharmacotherapy on patient outcome in cardiac transplant recipients. At 1-year follow-up in this nonblinded, single-center trial, patients treated with pravastatin (20 or 40 mg/day) initiated within 2 weeks of transplantation had a significant reduction in mortality rate and a significantly lower incidence of transplant arteriopathy. A number of important issues remain unanswered regarding treatment guidelines in patients with hyperlipidemia after heart transplantation. In January 1995 we began the Heart Transplant Lipid Registry, with 12 participant centers, to gather data prospectively on the efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering drugs in the treatment of dyslipidemia after heart transplantation.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗

Pre- and post-transplant anti-myosin and anti-heat shock protein antibodies and cardiac transplant outcome.

BACKGROUND: The purpose this study was to investigate the relationship of anti-myosin and anti-heat shock protein immunoglobulin G (IgG) serum antibodies to the original heart disease of cardiac transplant recipients, and also to rejection and patient survival after cardiac transplantation. METHODS: Anti-myosin and anti-heat shock protein (anti-hsp) IgG antibodies were evaluated in pre-transplant sera from 41 adult cardiac allograft recipients and in sequential post-transplant serum samples from 11 recipients, collected at the time of routine endomyocardial biopsies during the first 6 months after transplantation. In addition, the levels of these antibodies were determined from the sera of 28 healthy blood donors. RESULTS: Higher anti-myosin antibody levels were observed in pre-transplant sera than in sera from normal controls. Moreover, patients with chronic Chagas heart disease showed higher anti-myosin levels than patients with ischemic heart disease, and also higher levels, although not statistically significant, than patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Higher anti-hsp levels were also observed in patients compared with healthy controls, but no significant differences were detected among the different types of heart diseases. Higher pre-transplant anti-myosin, but not anti-hsp, levels were associated with lower 2-year post-transplant survival. In the post-transplant period, higher anti-myosin IgG levels were detected in sera collected during acute rejection than in sera collected during the rejection-free period, whereas anti-hsp IgG levels showed no difference between these periods. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings are of interest for post-transplant management and, in addition, suggest a pathogenic role for anti-myosin antibodies in cardiac transplant rejection, as has been proposed in experimental models of cardiac transplantation.

Adult↗

Infectious disease prophylaxis in renal transplant patients: a survey of US transplant centers.

Definitive approaches to most infectious diseases following renal transplantation have not been established, leading to different approaches at different transplant centers. To study the extent of these differences, we conducted a survey of the practices surrounding specific infectious diseases at US renal transplant centers. A survey containing 103 questions covering viral, bacterial, mycobacterial and protozoal infections was developed. Surveys were sent to program directors at all U.S. renal transplant centers. Responses were received from 147 of 245 (60%) transplant centers and were proportionately represented all centers with respect to program size and geographical location. Pre-transplant donor and recipient screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) is uniform, but great discrepancy exists in the testing for other agents. HCV seropositive donors are used in 49% of centers. HIV seropositivity remains a contraindication to transplantation, although 13% of centers indicated they have experience with such patients. Post-transplant, there is wide variety in approach to CMV and Pneumocystis carinii (PCP) prophylaxis. Similarly divergent practices affect post-transplant vaccinations, with 54% of centers routinely vaccinating all patients according to customary guidelines in non-transplant populations. In contrast, 22% of centers indicated they do not recommend vaccination in any patients. We believe an appreciation of the differences in approaches to post-transplant infectious complications may encourage individual centers to analyse the results of their own practices. Such analysis may assist in the design of studies to answer widespread and important questions regarding the care of patients following renal transplantation.

Humans↗

A decade of living donor transplantation in North American children: the 1998 annual report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS).

This report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS) covers the years 1987-1997, and analyzes data on 2,904 living donor (LD) transplants performed in 2,779 patients. Since 1991, approximately 300 LD transplants have been performed each year at the participating centers of the NAPRTCS. Caucasian children account for 72% of all LD recipients while African-American children constitute only 11%. There has been a gradual decline in the number of transplants performed in children under the age of 6 years from a peak of 30% in 1987, to 21% in 1997. Preoperative calcineurin inhibitor therapy has dropped from 71% in 1987 to 38% in 1997. Through 1996, at six months post-transplant 97% of recipients were receiving prednisone, 88% were maintained on cyclosporin A, and 79% were receiving azathioprine. Of patients transplanted in 1997, 47% are maintained on mycophenolate and 10% are maintained on tacrolimus. By day 15, 20% of index transplant patients have had an acute rejection and by the end of the first year 47% have had a rejection episode. Among patients transplanted in 1995-1996, 40% had a rejection in the first year. Nine per cent of rejection episodes are irreversible in children under 2 years of age and 5% of the episodes are irreversible in 25-year-old children. Estimated graft survival probability at 1 year is 91%, at 3 years it is 84% and at 5 years it is 78.5%. Rejection accounts for 33% of graft loss and recurrence constitutes another 10%. Influential prognostic variables for graft survival are race (African-American vs. others, relative risk (RR) = 2.0, p < 0.001), > 5 random transfusions (RR = 1.6, p < 0.001, T cell induction therapy (RR = 0.78, p = 0.01), and later year of entry (1989-1990 vs. 1994-1995, RR = 0.95, p = 0.04). Patient survival at 1 and 3 years was 97% and 96.5%, respectively, however, the 3-year patient survival of children under 2 years was 89%. The mean height deficit baseline (n=2,677) was -1.86, at 1 year post-transplant (n=1,459) it was -1.80, and at 5 years post-transplant (n=592) it was -2,06. This report, devoted specifically to LD pediatric transplants, raises the issues regarding the use of immunosuppression such as preoperative calcineurin inhibitors and T-cell antibodies. Studies to address the high incidence of chronic rejection and recurrence of original disease are necessary. Additional areas of concern are the high infant mortality and continued growth retardation post-transplantation.

Adolescent↗

Patient survival after renal transplantation: I. The impact of dialysis pre-transplant.

Patients on dialysis and recipients of renal transplants have higher mortality than individuals without kidney disease. In this study we evaluated the possible impact of dialysis therapy before transplantation on patient survival after the transplant. This analysis includes all of the patients who received a cadaveric renal transplant at The Ohio State University from 1984 to 1991 and who remained alive with functioning grafts for at least six months after the transplant (N = 523). After a follow-up of 84 +/- 14 months, 28% of the patients died and 23% lost their grafts. By multivariate analysis, reduced patient survival (censored at the time of graft loss) correlated with these pre-transplant variables: Older age (P < 0.0001), the presence of diabetes (P = 0.0002), smoking (P = 0.009), and the length of time on dialysis (P = 0.0002). Thus, 7% of patients who were never dialyzed, 23% of those dialyzed for less than three years, and 44% of patients dialyzed for > or = three years died post-transplant. By Cox regression, patient survival months correlated with time on dialysis pre-transplant (P = 0.0003). The type of dialysis (CAPD vs. hemodialysis) did not correlate with patient survival. Graft survival, censored for patient death, did not correlate with any of these pre-transplant variables. The relationship between time on dialysis and patient mortality is due to at least two factors: (1) transplant recipients who had dialysis for > or = 3 years had higher mortality due to infections (22%) than those who had dialysis for < 3 years (3%, P = 0.01 by X2); and (2) increasing time on dialysis increases the prevalence of both left ventricular hypertrophy (P = 0.008) and cardiomegaly (P = 0.004), and these relationships are statistically independent of other factors that also correlate with the prevalence of cardiovascular disease. In conclusion, increased time on dialysis prior to renal transplantation is associated with decreased survival of transplant recipients.

Adult↗

Post-transplant renal function in the first year predicts long-term kidney transplant survival.

BACKGROUND: Improvements in long-term kidney graft survival have been recently noted. However, the reasons for this were unclear. This study examined post-transplant renal function within the first year as an independent variable influencing long-term survival. METHODS: The influence of demographic characteristics (age, sex, race); transplant variables (cadaver versus living donor, cold ischemia time, HLA mismatching, delayed graft function and transplant year), and post-transplant variables (immunosuppressive agents for the prevention of acute rejection, clinical acute rejection and post-transplant renal function in the first year) on graft survival were analyzed for 105,742 adult renal transplants between 1988 and 1998. Renal function in the first year was expressed as serum creatinine at six months and one year and delta creatinine (change in serum creatinine between 6 months and 1 year). Graft half-life was used to measure long-term survival. RESULTS: During this 11-year period, the one-year serum creatinine values for cadaver recipients steadily improved, from 1.82 +/- 0.82 mg/dL in 1988 to 1.67 +/- 0.82 mg/dL in 1998 (P < 0.001), as did the graft half-life. There was a progressive decline in graft half-life for each incremental increase of six month, one year and Delta creatinine for living and cadaver donor transplants as well for cadaver transplants with donor age > and < or =50 years. The Relative Hazard (RH) for graft failure was 1.63 (1.61, 1.65; P < 0.0001) with each increment of 1.0 mg/dL of serum creatinine at one year post-transplant and it increased to 2.26 (2.2, 2.31; P < 0.0001) when the Delta creatinine was 0.5 mg/dL. The RH reduction for graft failure was substantially lower for the years 1993, 1996, 1997 and 1998 when post-transplant renal function was not included in the model (P < 0.05). However, the RH reduction per year was not different when post-transplant creatinine was included in the model, 1.01 (0.94 to 1.05; P = 0.89). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, one-year creatinine and Delta creatinine values predict long-term renal graft survival. Recent improvements in graft half-life are related to conservation of renal function within the first year post-transplantation.

Creatinine↗

Primary liver resection and salvage transplantation or primary liver transplantation in patients with single, small hepatocellular carcinoma and preserved liver function: an outcome-oriented decision analysis.

Two treatments are accepted for patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma </=5 cm in size and with preserved hepatic function: (1) liver resection, which can be performed without delay but has a high recurrence rate, and (2) liver transplantation, which has a better long-term survival, but is not easily available because grafts are scarce. A third possibility is to offer liver resection first and liver transplantation for tumor recurrence or deteriorating liver function ("salvage" transplantation). We investigated the implications of such a strategy with a Markov-based decision analytic model. In a scenario assuming intermediate values for 4 main variables (12-month waiting list; tumor progression outside transplantation criteria: 4% per month; recurrence after resection: 20% per year; recurrences eligible for transplantation: 60%), the life expectancy was 8.8 years for primary transplantation versus 7.8 years for primary resection and salvage transplantation, with a calculated use of grafts at 5 years of 52% for primary transplantation versus 23% for salvage transplantation. This study estimates of the survival and graft-saving of a strategy of primary resection and salvage transplantation according to variables that are to some extent predictable. This strategy may be a rational way to cope with lengthening waiting lists, especially for patients with tumors close to the limit for transplantation criteria, if the results of liver resection are good, if patients with the lowest risks of recurrence can be selected, and if a strict follow-up can detect recurrences when the patients are still transplantable.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular↗

The effect of the volume of procedures at transplantation centers on mortality after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: For many complex surgical procedures there is an association between a low volume of procedures and an increased risk of death for the patients who undergo the procedures. We examined the effect of the volume of procedures at transplantation centers on the risk of death after liver transplantation. We analyzed all liver transplantations performed in the United States between October 1, 1987, and April 30, 1994. Because the results for 1987 to 1991 were largely similar to those from 1992 to 1994, we focused on the more recent period. RESULTS: Between January 1, 1992, and April 30, 1994, 47 centers performed 20 or fewer liver transplantations each per year (total, 837 transplantations) and were designated low-volume centers, and 52 centers performed more than 20 transplantations each per year (total, 6526) and were designated high-volume centers. The one-year mortality rate for the low-volume centers was 25.9 percent, as compared with 20.0 percent for the high-volume centers. Thirteen centers, all of which had low volumes, had one-year mortality rates of more than 40 percent. Low-volume centers that were affiliated with high-volume centers, such as pediatric transplantation programs, had results similar to those of the high-volume centers. The one-year mortality rate at unaffiliated low-volume centers was 28.3 percent, as compared with a rate of 20.1 percent for the group of all high-volume centers plus affiliated low-volume centers (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: As a group, liver-transplantation centers in the United States that perform 20 or fewer transplantations per year have mortality rates that are significantly higher than those at centers that perform more than 20 transplantations per year. Information regarding the outcome of liver transplantation at transplantation centers should be made widely available to the public in a timely manner.

Hospitals, Special↗

Parathyroid function in long-term renal transplant patients: importance of pre-transplant PTH concentrations.

Lack of resolution of hyperparathyroidism after long-term renal transplantation is common. The relative roles of the graft function attained and the degree of pre-transplant hyperparathyroidism have not been established. Intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and several clinical parameters were studied before and 68.6+/-26.8 months (range: 30-124) after renal transplantation in 62 patients (20 females/42 males) with good renal function (creatinine <2 mg/dl). iPTH decreased from 214+/-229 pre-transplantation to 116+/-70 pg/ml post-transplantation (P<0.01). However, only 22.6% of patients had PTH concentrations in the normal range, and values greater than twice the upper normal limit were not uncommon (27.4%). Of the many variables analysed, creatinine (r=0.43; P=0.001) and pre-transplant PTH (r=0.31; P=0.02) significantly correlated with post-transplant PTH. After selecting patients with serum creatinine <1.5 mg/dl (n=46), pre-transplant PTH emerged as the more important predictor of post-transplant PTH (r=0.58; P<0.0001). After controlling for creatinine, the partial correlation was r=0.53, P<0.0001. We concluded that spontaneous resolution of hyperparathyroidism after renal transplantation is uncommon. In addition, the magnitude of pre-transplant hyperparathyroidism and the renal function determine the long-term post-transplant parathyroid function.

Adult↗

Ventricular remodeling following infant-pediatric cardiac transplantation. Does age at transplantation or size disparity matter?

Early left ventricular (LV) remodeling following pediatric cardiac transplantation has not been described. To identify patterns and determinants of change in left ventricular mass and volume posttransplant, we studied 125 consecutive children who underwent cardiac transplantation between January 1, 1989 and July 31, 1993. Two-dimensional imaging-directed M-mode echocardiograms were studied weekly until 26 weeks post-transplant. LV mass and volume (indexed to BSA1.5) were measured. LV mass index increased until 3 weeks post-transplant, and then decreased. The mean decrement in LV mass index after 8 weeks post-transplant (relative to baseline) was significantly larger in patients with donor-recipient weight ratio > 1.5 compared with patients with donor-recipient weight ratio < or = 1.5 (-2.2 g/m3 compared with 33.4 g/m3, respectively, P < 0.01). Multiple linear regression was performed employing donor-recipient weight ratio, time since transplantation, ischemic time, and age at transplant as prognostic variables. Donor-recipient weight ratio (P < 0.0001), time since transplant (P < 0.01), and age at transplant (P = 0.02) were identified as independent predictors of change in LV mass index. Donor-recipient weight ratio (P = 0.001) and time since transplantation (P = 0.02) were independent predictors of change in LV volume index. There was an interaction between donor-recipient weight ratio and time since transplantation, suggesting that donor-recipient weight ratio has an independent effect as well as a time-dependent effect on change in LV mass and volume indices. LV mass and volume indices increased early posttransplant and then decreased; this pattern was temporally predictable, and dependent on donor-recipient weight ratio and age at transplant.

Child, Preschool↗

Outcome after transplantation of young patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a report of the North American pediatric renal transplant cooperative study.

BACKGROUND: The risk of progressing to end-stage renal disease in children with lupus glomerulonephritis is 18% to 50%. Published reports of transplantation secondary to end-stage renal failure in adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) demonstrate equivalent patient and graft survival. The purpose of this analysis is to compare patient and graft outcomes of pediatric SLE renal transplant recipients with an age-, race-, and gender-matched control group. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS) database identified 100 renal transplants performed in 94 young SLE patients. A control group of 470 children having received 501 renal transplants was identified. RESULTS: The SLE cohort was primarily female (82%), non-Caucasian (61%), adolescents and differed from the control group in being less likely to be preemptively transplanted, in receiving longer pretransplant dialysis, and in being likely to have received more than five pretransplant transfusions. After transplantation, there were no differences seen in patient survival at 3 years (89% vs. 95%, SLE vs. control) or in overall graft failure rates (31% vs. 29%, SLE vs. control). There was a trend toward poorer graft survival in non-white SLE patients receiving living donor grafts compared with white SLE patients. An increased graft failure rate was seen among those SLE cadaveric transplant recipients receiving peritoneal dialysis before transplant compared with controls and compared with SLE patients receiving hemodialysis. No differences were seen in rates of acute tubular necrosis or overall acute rejection incidence, although there was a significant increase in the percentage of living donor SLE patients who experienced greater than four rejection episodes. There were nonsignificant trends toward increased graft loss due to patient death with a functioning graft as well as increased mortality secondary to infection in the SLE patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results of renal transplantation in young SLE patients are comparable to those seen in an age-, race- and gender-matched control group. The similar patient and graft survival is seen despite the SLE patients having an underlying disease with multiorgan involvement and despite receiving immunosuppression for potentially prolonged periods before transplantation. No outcome differences were seen except for an unexplained increase in the incidence of recurrent rejections (> or =4) in the living donor SLE patients as well as increased graft failure rate in those patients receiving cadaveric renal transplants after a period of peritoneal dialysis. The nonsignificant trends toward increased graft failures in non-white SLE patients receiving living donor grafts, increased graft loss secondary to death with a functioning graft, as well as the increased mortality due to infection deserve recognition and further study.

Adolescent↗

Outcomes of renal transplantation for recipients with lupus nephritis: analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database.

Prior analyses of transplant outcomes in lupus transplant recipients have not consisted of multivariate analyses in the modern immunosuppressive era. Here, we compared patient and graft outcomes in lupus and non-lupus recipients transplanted between 1996 to 2000 using the United Network of Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement Transplant Network database. We evaluated the impact of recipient and donor demographic factors, time on dialysis and the initial immunosuppression regimen on rejection rates and transplant outcomes. Univariate analysis showed similar graft but better patient survival rates for primary lupus and non-lupus transplant recipients (5-year patient survival rates for lupus cohort 85.2% for deceased donor transplants and 92.1% for living donor transplants as opposed to 82.1% and 89.8% respectively for the non-lupus cohort; P=0.05 and 0.03) but similar patient survival rates for deceased donor retransplant patients. After controlling for confounding factors, no differences in patient or graft survival were seen between the two groups. No difference in acute rejection rates were observed in deceased donor transplants, but there was a small but significant increase in the risk of acute rejection in living donor lupus transplant recipients (hazard ratio=1.19, P=0.05). Risk of graft failure was lower for deceased donor recipients receiving MMF (five-year graft loss rate=29.6% for MMF vs. 40.2% for those not receiving MMF, P<0.0001), but no differences were seen among living donor recipients. Outcomes were similar regardless of type of calcineurin inhibitor, induction therapy, and time on dialysis. We conclude that lupus transplant recipients have outcomes generally equivalent to non-lupus transplant recipients.

Adult↗

Equal overall rejection rate in pre-transplant flow-cytometric cross-match negative and positive adult recipients in liver transplantation.

T cell IgG flow-cytometric cross-matches (FCXM) using 48 stored pre-transplant patient serum samples and 40 stored serum samples collected 3 wk after liver transplantation and frozen spleen cells of cadaveric donors in 48 consecutive liver transplantations were performed retrospectively. T cell IgG FCXM using pre-transplant serum samples was compared with 46 complement-dependent lymphocytotoxic cross-matches (CDCXM) performed at the time of transplantation. Clinical relevance of these tests was evaluated in relation to acute rejection, 1-, 3- and 5-yr graft and patient survival. The incidence of positive FCXM was 33% (16 of 48) and 13% (six of 46) by CDCXM. The median time of acute rejection was 29 d after transplantation in FCXM positive group (range 13-101 d) and 22 d in FCXM negative group (range 7-157 d, NS). Rejection rate was similar in 16 pre-transplant FCXM positive patients (eight of 16, 50%) compared with six pre-transplant CDCXM positive patients (three of six, 50%; NS). Recipients having graft rejection tended to be more often pre-transplant FCXM positive (eight of 21, 38%) than CDCXM positive (three of 21, 14%), but the difference was not significant (p > 0.1). No difference was found in the positive predictive value in relation to acute rejection between positive FCXM and CDCXM (69% vs. 50%; NS). Furthermore there was no correlation between post-transplant positive FCXM and acute rejection. No difference was found between pre-transplant T cell IgG FCXM positive and negative recipients in relation to graft or patient survival. Our findings are supportive for little risk associated with preformed donor-specific antibodies in liver transplantation.

Adult↗

Outcome of renal transplantation for Wilms' tumor and Denys-Drash syndrome: a report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study.

In some children with bilateral Wilms' tumor, reduction of tumor burden cannot be accomplished without total nephrectomy. In Denys-Drash syndrome, nephrectomy is required for associated Wilms' tumor or after progression to end stage renal disease secondary to diffuse mesangial sclerosis because of risk of development of Wilms' tumor. Current recommendation is to wait at least 1-2 yr after completion of chemotherapy for Wilms' tumor before renal transplantation. The North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study dialysis (1992-2001) and transplant registries (1987-2002) were analyzed, comparing children 0-18 yr old with Wilms' tumor and Denys-Drash syndrome to other primary diagnoses. There were 37 children with Wilms' tumor and 33 with Denys-Drash syndrome in the dialysis registry. Of these, 10 children with Wilms' tumor and three with Denys-Drash syndrome did not receive a renal transplant and all died. The cause of death was Wilms' tumor in eight children with Wilms' tumor and in one with Denys-Drash syndrome. The transplant registry included 43 children with Wilms' tumor, 43 children with Denys-Drash syndrome, and 7469 patients with other diagnoses. Acute rejection, graft and patient survival profiles from all three groups at 6 months, 1 and 3 yr post-transplant were comparable. There were no graft failures or deaths because of recurrent Wilms' tumor in the Drash group. There was one death with Wilms' tumor in the Wilms' group - a 2.5-yr-old child transplanted after 6 months of dialysis who died of Wilms' <6 months after renal transplantation. In conclusion, most children dialyzed because of Wilms' tumor and Denys-Drash syndrome who did not receive a renal transplant died of Wilms' tumor. However, the outcomes of children with Wilms' tumor and Denys-Drash syndrome who proceeded to renal transplantation are comparable with children with other diagnoses, with no graft failures because of recurrence and only one death from Wilms' tumor in a Wilms' patient who received only a short course of dialysis prior to transplantation. Current practices in children with Wilms' tumor and Denys-Drash syndrome appear to be on target to portend good outcome following renal transplantation.

Adolescent↗