Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “RECTAL PROLAPSE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15Linked to original sources
PubMed1989

Colonic resection in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse.

For the good risk patient, nearly all surgeons recommend an abdominal approach as the surest method of eliminating a complete rectal prolapse. The most commonly performed abdominal procedures are rectal suspension-fixation operations utilizing slings of synthetic material or suture without foreign material. Occasionally both of these procedures are combined with a segmental colorectal resection. Rectal mobilization with fixation of the rectum to the sacrum alone, by whatever means, has a high rate of success with a low mortality and morbidity. The wisdom of adding colorectal resection to rectopexy in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse remains controversial. The authors favor abdominal rectopexy with sigmoid resection because it avoids foreign material, eliminates the risk of volvulus, improves bowel management problems, and has low morbidity with a low recurrence rate. In our series of 102 patients treated by rectopexy and sigmoid resection, there were no deaths and only 4 per cent morbidity related to the anastomosis. After a mean follow-up period of four years, the recurrence rate was 1.9 per cent.

Colectomy↗
PubMed1990

Rectal intussusception and rectal prolapse: detection and postoperative evaluation with defecography.

The authors studied pre- and post-operative defecograms in 20 patients with rectal intussusception and three with rectal prolapse to assess the value of defecography in detection of these conditions. Eleven patients also had solitary rectal ulcers. Two to 3 months after surgery, patients underwent defecography, and results were correlated with postoperative symptoms. In all three patients with rectal prolapse, and 13 of 20 with intussusception, findings on postoperative defecograms were normal and symptoms were gone. Abnormalities and symptoms persisted in two patients and recurred in another two. In five patients, symptoms persisted despite normal defecographic findings. In 11 patients with solitary rectal ulcers, rectal lesions were cured in nine; in two, intussusception and rectal lesions recurred. Thus, presence or absence of solitary rectal ulcer corresponded to postoperative symptoms in all cases. Symptoms and postoperative defecographic findings corresponded in 20. This study suggests that rectal intussusception and prolapse most likely lead to defecation disorders and that defecography is useful in detecting them.

Defecation↗
PubMed1999

Resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse. The laparoscopic approach.

BACKGROUND: Resection rectopexy through open laparotomy is an established procedure for the treatment of rectal prolapse. METHODS: Resection rectopexy was successfully performed in 10 multiparous women by the laparoscopic approach (LAP), and the results were compared to those of eight women with laparotomy resection rectopexy (OPEN). Preoperative and postoperative assessment included anorectal manometry, defecography, and measurement of large-bowel transit. RESULTS: The duration of the operation was longer in the LAP than in the OPEN group (p < 0.01). Morbidity was lower (p < 0.01) and hospital stay was shorter (p < 0.001) after the LAP than in the OPEN group. Prolapse was cured in all cases. Postoperatively, anal resting and squeeze pressures and rectal compliance increased significantly in both groups of patients (p = 0.007, p = 0.003, and p < 0.001, respectively). In all patients, the operation resulted in acceleration of large-bowel transit (p < 0.001) and in more obtuse anorectal angles at rest (p = 0.007). In addition, sampling events were observed more commonly (p = 0.008) postoperatively. Preoperatively, incontinence was present in 13 patients (seven LAP and six OPEN) and persisted in four of them after rectopexy (two LAP and two OPEN). CONCLUSIONS: Resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse can be performed safely via the laparoscopic route. Recovery is uneventful and of shorter duration after the laparoscopic than after the open approach. Similarly satisfactory functional results are obtained with both procedures.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Overt rectal prolapse following repair of stage IV vaginal vault prolapse.

Pelvic organ prolapse is an increasingly common problem as women are living longer. With the growing numbers of surgeries performed to correct this problem, further research is needed to understand the long-term success as well as possible complications of these procedures. One potential complication that needs further study is de novo rectal prolapse after repair of pelvic organ prolapse, specifically after colpocleisis. Defacography may be an important part of the preoperative workup in the patient with pelvic organ prolapse. Currently, there is a controversy as to whether internal, or occult, rectal prolapse on defacography should be repaired at the time of other pelvic reconstructive surgery. We report on a case of overt rectal prolapse after repair of Stage IV vaginal vault prolapse with a colpocleisis, levator ani plication, and a minimally invasive midurethral sling. We discuss the issues surrounding preoperative management of these patients and propose a theory explaining why prolapse in other areas of the pelvis may occur after reconstructive surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

[Result of surgical treatment of exteriorized rectal prolapse in adults. Experience of 21 years].

Between 1971 and 1992, 89 patients (57 women, 32 men; mean age: 61 years) underwent surgical treatment for total rectal prolapse. 68.5% were constipated, and 12.3% had a solitary rectal ulcer, 46% were incontinent (3 grades 2, 11 grades 3, 27 grades 4). Twelve patients (21%) had been previously, but unsuccessfully operated. Manometry showed low resting pressures in the upper part of the anal canal, particularly in incontinent patients. Voluntary contraction was lower in incontinent patients. The resting anorectal angle was obtuse (113 degrees). Orr-Loygue operation (n = 53), modified rectopexy (n = 22), rectopexy to the left inguinal ligament (n = 6), Delorme operation (n = 4), and posterior rectopexy (n = 4) were performed. There was no operative mortality. Intraoperative and postoperative morbidity rates were 3.4% (n = 3) and 29%. Rectal prolapse recurred in 3 cases (3.4%). Solitary rectal ulcer healed in all patients. Only 8 patients were incontinent after operation, but control was better in 6 cases; in other both patients, preoperative electromyography showed grade III denervation. Bowel habit was postoperatively better (68.5% of patients were constipated before operation, 51.7% after operation). Resting pressures increased in preoperatively incontinent patients in the upper part of the anal canal; resting external sphincter pressures always increased. There was no change in the resting anorectal angle (112 degrees).

Adult↗
PubMed1988

[Total rectal prolapse in young adults. Apropos of 10 cases in Africans].

The authors described their African experience on the basis of ten cases of total rectal prolapse in the young adult and child. Total rectal prolapse and internal procidentia fall within the general context of disorders of rectal mechanics. In most instances, such forced prolapse occurs in young individuals who are usually muscular and used to difficult work. Nevertheless, defecation efforts in these chronically constipated patients play a significant role. Furthermore, there is frequently a concomitant presence of a megadolichosigmoid colon. In all cases treatment was surgical, involving rectopexy at the promontory using strips of fascia lata or even peritoneum. The post-operative course was in all cases uneventful with no recurrences and the routine prescription of adjuvant treatment for constipation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Complete rectal prolapse in adults: a Tanzanian experience.

This is a retrospective report of nine patients with complete rectal prolapse managed by the authors at the Muhimbili Medical Centre, Dar es Salaam between 1990 and 1993. The average age of patients was 36 years and eight of the patients were males. Six of the patients presented as emergency admissions of whom three had irreducibility and required perineal proctosigmoidectomy. This was the procedure of choice for irreducible complete rectal prolapse.

Adult↗
PubMed1980

Concealed rectal prolapse.

In a series of 97 patients with rectal prolapse 36 were unaware that the prolapse was occurring. Failure to recognize the prolapse may cause delay in diagnosis and inappropriate treatment. In most instances the prolapse was considered to be primary and responded well to surgical repair; however, in a few patients the prolapse seemed to follow prolonged straining, and in these surgical repair is not so successful.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Delorme's operation for rectal prolapse in elderly or unfit patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results after Delorme's operation for rectal prolapse in elderly and unfit patients. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis and telephone interview. SETTING: Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden. SUBJECTS: A consecutive series of 14 women (median age 82, range 32-92) operated on for rectal prolapse 1987-1992 and followed up after a median of 18 months. RESULTS: There were no serious postoperative complications. Continence was improved in 6/11 incontinent patients. The recurrence rate was 3/14 (21%). CONCLUSION: Delorme's operation is an attractive alternative in elderly or unfit patients, but is not recommended for younger and low risk patients because of the recurrence rate.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Rectal prolapse; a review of Dutch surgical practice.

Many different technics have been described for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Transabdominal fixation of the rectum is the procedure currently most favoured, as in The Netherlands, where the majority of patients with rectal prolapse are treated in this way. A questionaire sent to all teaching hospitals showed that in only seven out of 27 hospitals postanal repair is carried out in cases of postoperative fecal incontinence.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Laparoscopic treatment of rectal prolapse: experience gained in a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: We report the findings of a prospective multicenter observational study carried out by the Study Group for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery on patients undergoing laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted surgery for rectal prolapse. The study investigated the safety of various laparoscopic techniques in terms of perioperative and postoperative general and technique-specific complications and compared the results with those reported for open surgery in this area. METHODS: Of the 150 patients undergoing laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery for rectal prolapse 124 received rectopexy combined with resection and 26 rectopexy alone. In 85 patients a mesh was employed during rectopexy. The conversion rate was 5.3%. RESULTS: Perioperative complications (21 surgical and 35 general perioperative) were recorded in 37 patients (24.7%). The reoperation rate was 5.3% (bleeding 2, anastomotic leak 2, ileus 4). No procedure-specific perioperative complications were observed. In particular, reduced surgical trauma led to fewer severe postoperative complications such as cardiopulmonary problems (3.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The techniques of conventional prolapse surgery can readily be translated to the laparoscopic modality, since oncological criteria do not have to be considered. The usually elderly patients in this group benefit to a particular degree from the known advantages associated with reduced surgical trauma. Perioperative morbidity is determined largely by the surgeon's experience. We therefore believe that rectal prolapse is a suitable indication for the minimally invasive modality in the hands of trained surgeons.

Aged↗
PubMed1987

Late results of silicone rubber perianal suture for rectal prolapse.

Twenty-one patients were reviewed five to 12 years after silicone rubber perianal suture for rectal prolapse. Sixteen patients (76 percent) were continent with control of prolapse and two patients (9 percent) suffered only from occasional prolapse or incontinence. Rebanding for silicone cutout or fracture was required in four patients and a second rebanding operation was needed in two. Silicone rubber perianal suture for rectal prolapse stands the test of time and might be recommended for more widespread use in younger patients.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Rectal prolapse. Functional results after the Orr-Loygue's rectopexy technique].

The aims of surgery in rectal prolapse are various: reducing the prolapse, preventing relapse, clearing up incontinence and avoiding constipation. Among several technical options available, anterior rectopexy would appear to be the most suitable for achieving these aims. A retrospective clinical study was conducted in 32 patients operated on from January 1996 to June 1999. For patient recruitment, the preoperative examinations were clinical evaluation, barium enema, anorectal manometry, and urodynamic tests. Surgical procedures were Orr-Loygue rectopexy in 29 cases and Ripstein rectopexy in 3 cases. A sigmoidectomy was also performed in 9 cases and a Burch cystopexy in 4 cases. Early results are available for all patients; only 29 have been evaluated after a mean follow-up of 47 months (range: 30-72). Rectal tenesmus, faecal incontinence and urinary incontinence improved in all cases. Constipation cleared up in 9 cases after a complementary sigmoidectomy; in 15 of the remaining 20 patients constipation persisted or developed. Indications for surgery for rectal prolapse must be considered with caution. The good results of anterior rectopexy depend on correct surgical technique and prevention of septic and pelvic complications. Sigmoidectomy does not increase the morbility rate. A planned colic resection in patients with delayed transit would prevent postoperative constipation. The good results are stable even over long-term follow-up periods. This procedure is also effective for the treatment of genital prolapses.

Digestive System Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed2003

Functional results after the Orr-Loygue transabdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess functional results after Orr-Loygue transabdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients operated on for complete rectal prolapse between 1995 and 1998 were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with regard to anal incontinence, constipation, evacuation difficulties, and overall satisfaction with a standardized questionnaire. Anal continence assessment was based on a clinical scoring system. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 28 +/- 13 (range, 12-57) months, no prolapse recurred. Preoperative and postoperative rates of incontinence were 81 percent (25/31) and 55 percent (17/31), respectively (P < 0.03). Continence improved in 24 (96 percent) of the 25 patients who were incontinent before surgery. The mean incontinence score decreased from 11.7 +/- 7.8 preoperatively to 3.2 +/- 4.2 postoperatively (P < 0.001). The self-reported constipation rate was 61 percent (19/31) before surgery and 71 percent (22/31) after surgery (P = nonsignificant). Constipation appeared or worsened in 16 patients (52 percent), whereas it disappeared or improved in 8 (26 percent; P = nonsignificant). Evacuation difficulties increased significantly after surgery from 23 percent (7/31) to 61 percent (19/31; P < 0.003). Ninety-seven percent of patients reported good or very good satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Transabdominal Orr-Loygue rectopexy resulted in improved continence and a high satisfaction level. Despite a significant postoperative increase in evacuation difficulties, only a 10 percent (nonsignificant) increase in the self-reported constipation rate was observed.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Successful treatment of rectal prolapse by laparoscopic suture rectopexy.

BACKGROUND: A wide variety of procedures are used for management of rectal prolapse. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of laparoscopic suture rectopexy in the treatment of this condition. METHODS: From May 1991 to May 1998, 32 consecutive patients were treated by laparoscopic suture rectopexy. In four of them, an additional sigmoid colectomy was performed for refractory constipation or redundant large bowels. The clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: Of our 32 patients, 27 were female and five were male. The median age was 51.5 years (range, 20-87). The median operative time was 150 min (range, 90-300), and the median hospital stay was 5 days (range, 2-20). There were no operative mortalities. Three postoperative complications required reoperations for bowel obstructions. At a median follow-up of 33 months (range 3-78), there were two complete recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience indicates that laparoscopic suture rectopexy, with and without sigmoid colectomy, is safe, feasible, and effective for the treatment of rectal prolapse.

Adult↗