Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Liquid Phase Microextraction”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Identification and characterization of fenton oxidation products of surfactants by electrospray mass spectrometry and by solid phase microextraction gas chromatography mass spectrometry. 2. Fatty alcohol polyethoxy sulphates

The Fenton reaction for the degradation of surfactants has been investigated and partial degradation products have been identified and characterized by mass spectrometry for the case of fatty alcohol polyethoxy sulphates. The polar water-soluble products were investigated by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) with electrospray ionization (ESI), and the volatile products leaving the mixture during the reaction were trapped by means of solid phase microextraction (SPME) and investigated by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) with electron and chemical ionization. The oxidation leads to the formation of products with hydroxyl and epoxide groups due to insertion of oxygen atoms or with terminal ethoxylic moieties deriving from the loss of the hydrophilic sulphate group. The formation of volatile aldehydes is also observed, corresponding to the fragmentation between hydrocarbon and ethoxylic chains. The extent of mineralization is dependent on peroxide and iron(II) concentrations. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2000

Fiber-in-tube solid-phase microextraction: a fibrous rigid-rod heterocyclic polymer as the extraction medium.

A novel "fiber-in-tube" configuration has been applied to the extraction tube of solid phase microextraction (SPME), and the direct coupling of the extraction process to liquid chromatography (LC) has been accomplished for the analysis of n-butylphthalate in wastewater. By using this fiber-in-tube SPME/LC system the preconcentration factor for the phthalate was about 160 with 20 min extraction and no interference peak was observed in the chromatogram. The results also showed the potential applications of this fiber-in-tube SPME/LC for the analysis of sub-ppb level (i.e., lower than 1 ng/mL) of various organic analytes in aqueous sample matrix without a large solvent consumption during the preconcentration process.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2000

Solid-phase microextraction in biomedical analysis.

Chromatographic methods are preferred in the analysis of organic molecules with lower molecular mass (<500 g/mol) in body fluids, i.e., the assay of drugs, metabolites, endogenous substances and poisons as well as of environmental exposure by gas chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography (LC), for example. Sample preparation in biomedical analysis is mainly performed by liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase extraction. However, new methods are investigated with the aim to increase the sample throughput and to improve the quality of analytical methods. Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was introduced about a decade ago and it was mainly applied to environmental and food analysis. All steps of sample preparation, i.e., extraction, concentration, derivatization and transfer to the chromatograph, are integrated in one step and in one device. This is accomplished by the intelligent combination of an immobilized extraction solvent (a polymer) with a special geometry (a fiber within a syringe). It was a challenge to test this novel principle in biomedical analysis. Thus, an introduction is provided to the theory of SPME in the present paper. A critical review of the first applications to biomedical analyses is presented in the main paragraph. The optimization of SPME as well as advantages and disadvantages are discussed. It is concluded that, because of some unique characteristics, SPME can be introduced with benefit into several areas of biomedical analysis. In particular, the application of headspace SPME-GC-MS in forensic toxicology and environmental medicine appears to be promising. However, it seems that SPME will not become a universal method. Thus, on-line SPE-LC coupling with column-switching technique may be a good alternative if an analytical problem cannot be sufficiently dealt with by SPME.

Body Fluids↗
PubMed2003

Solid-phase microextraction for the analysis of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in water samples.

A novel solid-phase microextraction (SPME) method coupled to gas chromatography with electron capture detection (GC-ECD) was developed as an alternative to liquid-liquid and solid-phase extraction for the analysis of short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) in water samples. The extraction efficiency of five different commercially available fibres was evaluated and the 100-microm polydimethylsiloxane coating was the most suitable for the absorption of the SCCPs. Optimisation of several SPME parameters, such as extraction time and temperature, ionic strength and desorption time, was performed. Quality parameters were established using Milli-Q, tap water and river water. Linearity ranged between 0.06 and 6 microg l(-1) for spiked Milli-Q water and between 0.6 and 6 microg l(-1) for natural waters. The precision of the SPME-GC-ECD method for the three aqueous matrices was similar and gave relative standard deviations (RSD) between 12 and 14%. The limit of detection (LOD) was 0.02 microg l(-1) for Milli-Q water and 0.3 microg l(-1) for both tap water and river water. The optimised SPME-GC-ECD method was successfully applied to the determination of SCCPs in river water samples.

Chromatography, Gas↗
PubMed2006

Determination of free concentration of Paclitaxel in liposome formulation.

PURPOSE: An important step in the development of liposome-based formulations is estimating the free drug concentration in the aqueous solution surrounding liposomes. This research presents a new method for determination of free concentrations, based on membrane-protected solid-phase microextraction (SPME). METHODS: For effective direct extraction of low molecular weight compounds from complex liquid samples, a hollow membrane was used to form a concentric sheath around a coated SPME fiber. The membrane blocked the access of large particles, like liposomes, to the coating surface, while target analytes with low molecular weight diffused through the membrane and reached the extraction phase. Quantification was conveniently performed by reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The carbowax/templated resin SPME fiber was determined to be the most suitable for these assays, providing enough sensitivity when an extraction time of one hour was used. The free concentration of paclitaxel was found to be 0.36 microg/mL, significantly below the solubility limit of paclitaxel in water. CONCLUSION: The method was successfully applied for determining free paclitaxel in liposome formulations based on dioleyl-trimethyl-ammonium-propane, with good linearity over the range of concentrations of interest. The method was faster and more practical than equilibrium dialysis, as the SPME approach provided preconcentration and convenient delivery to the analytical system.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2006

[Monitoring sulfadiazine and sulfamethazine residues in eggs using polymer monolith microextraction coupled with high performance liquid chromatography].

The method for the quantitative monitoring of sulfadiazine and sulfamethazine residues in eggs was established by coupling polymer monolith microextraction (PMME) with high performance liquid chromatography and ultra-violet detection (HPLC/UV). The PMME is an effective sample preparation technique, which has been developed on the basis of in-tube solid-phase microextraction. A poly (methacrylic acid-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate) monolithic capillary column was selected as an extraction device. To obtain the optimum extraction efficiency, several parameters related to PMME, including extraction flow-rate, extraction volume, and pH value of the sample matrix were investigated. The sample solution can be directly injected into the device for extraction after simple extraction with ethanol, dilution with phosphate buffer solution, and centrifugation. Because of the high extraction capacity of the monolith column, low detection limits (S/N=3) (8.8 ng/g for sulfamethazine and 11.2 ng/g for sulfadiazine) and quantification limits (S/N=10) (29.3 ng/g for sulfamethazine and 37.5 ng/g for sulfadiazine) were obtained. The method showed good linearity ranging from 50 to 5000 ng/g. Excellent reproducibility of the method was found by intraday and interday precisions, yielding the relative standard deviations of < or = 7.6% and < or = 8.2%, respectively. Recoveries for them were higher than 65%. Compared with the standard methods used in China, improved results were obtained using this method. The proposed method was proved to be simple, rapid, sensitive, and competent in monitoring sulfadiazine and sulfamethazine residues in eggs.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of automated micro solid phase extraction tips (micro-SPE) for the validation of a LC-MS/MS bioanalytical method.

Automated micro-SPE tips were successfully utilized for the determination of posaconazole in rat plasma. The bioanalytical method using micro-SPE tips was successfully qualified for routine quantitation of posaconazole over the concentration range of 10.0-10,000 ng/mL in rat EDTA plasma. Inter-assay precision, based on percent relative deviation for n=18 replicate quality controls, was < or =5.7%. Inter-assay accuracy based on n=18 replicate quality controls was +/-7.7%. Complete solid phase extraction using micro-SPE tips was demonstrated on a Tomtec liquid handler where >95% recovery for posaconazole was obtained. The micro-SPE tips had sufficient capacity to extract at least 100 microL plasma fortified with 10 microg/mL of posaconazole and the analyte could be efficiently eluted with as little as 60 microL of methanol. Of particular note is the unique ability of these micro-SPE tips to perform exhaustive solid phase extraction more commonly performed when using liquid/liquid extraction.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Multiple solid-phase microextraction.

Theoretical aspects of multiple solid-phase microextraction are described and the principle is illustrated with the extraction of lidocaine from aqueous solutions. With multiple extraction under non-equilibrium conditions considerably less time is required in order to obtain an extraction yield that is equal to that of one extraction at equilibrium. On the other side, the extraction yield can be increased if multiple extraction is performed with the same total time as is needed for one extraction at equilibrium time. The effect of multiple extraction is strongly dependent on the value of the partition constant and for practical use the length of the desorption time is important. A good agreement between theoretical and experimental data has been obtained. Chromatograms are presented showing the potential of multiple solid-phase microextraction.

Chromatography, Liquid↗
PubMed2004

Effect of fat nature and aroma compound hydrophobicity on flavor release from complex food emulsions.

Complex food emulsions containing either hydrogenated palm kernel oil (vegetable fat) or anhydrous milk fat (animal fat) were flavored by using different aroma compounds. The fats differed by their fatty acid and triacylglycerol compositions and by their melting behavior, while the aroma compounds (ethyl butanoate, ethyl hexanoate, methyl hexanoate, mesifurane, linalool, diacetyl, cis-3-hexen-1-ol, and gamma-octalactone) differed by their hydrophobicity. Application of differential scanning calorimetry to fat samples in bulk and emulsified forms indicated differences in the ratio of solid-to-liquid between temperatures ranging from 10 to 35 degrees C. Solid-phase microextraction coupled with GC-MS analysis indicated that flavor release from food emulsions containing animal or vegetable fat differed depending on both the fat nature and flavor compound hydrophobicity. The release of diacetyl was higher for emulsions containing animal fat, whereas the release of esters was higher for emulsions containing vegetable fat. The release of cis-3-hexenol, linalool, gamma-octalactone, and mesifurane (2,5-dimethyl-4-methoxy-(2H)-furan-3-one) was very similar for the two fatty systems. The above results were discussed not only in terms of aroma compound hydrophobicity, but also in terms of structural properties of the emulsions as affected by the lipid source.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Improved gas chromatography methods for micro-volume analysis of haloacetic acids in water and biological matrices.

A fast headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography method for micro-volume (0.1 mL) samples was optimized for the analysis of haloacetic acids (HAAs) in aqueous and biological samples. It includes liquid-liquid microextraction (LLME), derivatization of the acids to their methyl esters using sulfuric acid and methanol after evaporation, followed by headspace solid-phase microextraction with gas chromatography and electron capture detection (SPME-GC-ECD). The derivatization procedure was optimized to achieve maximum sensitivity using the following conditions: esterification for 20 min at 80 degrees C in 10 microL methanol, 10 microL sulfuric acid and 0.1 g anhydrous sodium sulfate. Multi-point standard addition method was used to determine the effect of the sample matrix by comparing with internal standard method. It was shown that the effect of the matrix for urine and blood samples in this method is insignificant. The method detection limits are in the range of 1 microg L(-1) for most of the HAAs, except for monobromoacetic acid (MBAA) (3 microg L(-1)) and for monochloroacetic acid (MCAA) (16 microg L(-1)). The optimized procedure was applied to the analysis of HAAs in water, urine and blood samples. All nine HAAs can be separated in < 13 min for biological samples and < 7 min for drinking water samples, with total sample preparation and analysis time < 50 min. Analytical uncertainty can increase dramatically as the sample volume decreases; however, similar precision was observed with our method using 0.1 mL samples as with a standard method using 40 mL samples.

Acetic Acid↗
PubMed2004

Determination of hexanal as indicator of the lipidic oxidation state in potato crisps using gas chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography.

Hexanal (an oxidative state indicator) formed in the headspace of potato crisps during storage was evaluated using two different procedures. First, solid-phase microextraction, an innovative sampling preparation methodology was used. It consisted on the absorption of analytes directly from samples and subsequent thermal desorption on the gas chromatograph (GC) injector. Then, a reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic technique (HPLC) was employed to quantify hexanal in the form of 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone derivative. Methods were evaluated in what concerns to validation parameters such as linearity, repeatibility and detection limit. GC (LOD = 1 ng/ml) method resulted in more sensitive method than HPLC (LOD = 9 ng/ml). The most suitable technique for hexanal measurement was selected.

Aldehydes↗
PubMed1999

Identification of proteins in complexes by solid-phase microextraction/multistep elution/capillary electrophoresis/tandem mass spectrometry.

A method to directly identify proteins in complex mixtures by solid-phase microextraction (micro-SPE)/multistep elution/capillary electrophoresis (CE)/tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is described. A sheathless liquid-metal junction interface is used to interface CE and electrospray ionization MS/MS. A subfemtomole detection limit is achieved for protein identification through database searching using MS/MS data. The SPE serves as a semiseparation dimension using an organic-phase step-elution gradient in combination with the second separation dimension for increased resolving power of complex peptide mixtures. This approach improves the concentration detection limit for CE and allows more proteins in complex mixtures to be identified. A 75-protein complex from yeast ribosome is analyzed using this method and 80-90% of the proteins in the complex can be identified by searching the database using the MS/MS data from a complete analysis. This multidimensional CE/MS/MS methodology provides an alternative to multidimensional liquid chromatography/MS/MS for direct identification of small amounts of protein in mixtures.

Electrophoresis, Capillary↗
PubMed2003

Solid-phase microextraction as a clean-up and preconcentration procedure for organochlorine pesticides determination in fish tissue by gas chromatography with electron capture detection.

The feasibility of developing a single-step clean-up, enrichment procedure for organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in fish tissue samples based on solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was investigated. The general analytical methodology developed combines conventional solid-liquid extraction of the OCPs from the sample using an organic solvent with SPME over the organic extract followed by gas chromatography-electron-capture detection (GC-ECD) analysis. Experimental SPME conditions such as extraction time, temperature and matrix effects were optimised. Under optimised conditions, precision, linearity range, detection limits and accuracy were evaluated. Detection limits obtained for fish tissue samples were in the range of 0.1-0.7 ng g(-1). Good recoveries (over 70% in all cases) were achieved from samples spiked at a concentration level of 10 ng g(-1). The accuracy of the developed SPME-GC-ECD procedure in real samples has been verified by analysing, using the standard addition method, a certified reference material (CRM 430, OCPs in pork fat) with satisfactory results.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Coupling of solid-phase microextraction and capillary isoelectric focusing with laser-induced fluorescence whole column imaging detection for protein analysis.

A coupling method of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and capillary isoelectric focusing (CIEF) with laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) whole column imaging detection (WCID) was developed for the analysis of proteins. Unlike other liquid-phase separation methods and conventional CIEF, proteins are focused into stationary bands within a pH gradient in CIEF-WCID. Thus, CIEF-WCID is the most compatible liquid-phase separation method for coupling with SPME, which can effectively resolve the problems associated with the slow desorption kinetics of SPME in a liquid phase. By combining SPME and CIEF-WCID, the desorption time can be as long as necessary, allowing complete desorption without any band broadening and analyte carryover. By using this method, R-phycoerythrin in water can be extracted by SPME in 10 min, and subsequently analyzed by CIEF-LIF-WCID within 20 min, providing a limit of detection of 3.5 x 10(-12) M (S/N = 3). The feasibility of the SPME-CIEF-LIF-WCID method was demonstrated by extracting and analyzing extracellular phycoerythrins in cultured cyanobacteria samples. Extracellular phycoerythrins at the nanomolar level were extracted and analyzed in 30 min, while avoiding the interference of the cyanobacteria cells.

Fluorescence↗
PubMed2002

Analysis of phenoxy herbicides in bovine milk by means of liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction with a hollow-fiber membrane.

A preconcentration technique, which involves liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction, was developed to determine phenoxy herbicides in bovine milk. A layer of organic phase was impregnated into the pores of a 3.5 cm long porous hollow fiber, while the internal volume of the fiber was filled with NaOH solution (the acceptor solution) that was connected directly to the needle of a microsyringe. The fiber was then immersed into 8 ml of acidified milk sample. When the sample solution was stirred, acidic analytes were extracted into the organic phase and back extracted simultaneously into the alkaline acceptor medium as the analytes were protonated at low pH and deprotonated at high pH. After extracting for a prescribed time, 5 microl acceptor solution was taken back into the syringe and injected directly into a HPLC system for quantification. The analytes were extracted quantitatively from the sample solution into the acceptor solution with a large enrichment factor of 900. Due to its low cost, the hollow-fiber extraction device was disposed of after a single extraction that eliminated the possibility of carry over effects. In addition, because a small volume of organic solvent was required and little waste is generated, the procedure is environmentally friendly, and is compatible with the "green chemistry" concept.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Comparison of solid-phase microextraction and stir bar sorptive extraction for the quantification of malodors in wastewater.

Malodors in wastewater from animal-rearing facilities are due to the presence of characteristic polar compounds. The efficiency and reproducibility of three solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibers (Carboxen-PDMS, polyacrylate, and PDMS) as well as PDMS-coated stir bars for the measurement of some of these compounds in the liquid phase were compared. In initial experiments, the SPME fibers and stir bars were exposed to a standard water solution containing a mixture of 18 compounds with a range of octanol-water partition coefficients. The polyacrylate SPME fibers and PDMS-coated stir bars, having been found to possess the best combination of extraction efficiency and reproducibility of measurement, were compared for the extraction of a high-strength swine wastewater. Ten compounds, which are known contributors to malodors in wastewater, were quantified by both methods of extraction. For most compounds, greater levels were estimated by the PDMS-coated stir bars than by SPME, and measurement reproducibility was also greater. For both methods of extraction, there was greater variation in the measurement of volatile fatty acids than there was for aromatics.

Adsorption↗
PubMed2006

Determination of drugs in biological fluids by direct injection of samples for liquid-chromatographic analysis.

The analysis of drugs in various biological fluids is an important criterion for the determination of the physiological performance of a drug. After sampling of the biological fluid, the next step in the analytical process is sample preparation. The complexity of biological fluids adds to the challenge of direct determination of the drug by chromatographic analysis, therefore demanding a sample preparation step that is often time-consuming, tedious, and frequently overlooked. However, direct on-line injection methods offer the advantage of reducing sample preparation steps and enabling effective pre-concentration and clean-up of biological fluids. These procedures can be automated and therefore reduce the requirements for handling potentially infectious biomaterial, improve reproducibility, and minimize sample manipulations and potential contamination. The objective of this review is to present an overview of the existing literature with emphasis on advances in automated sample preparation methods for liquid-chromatographic methods. More specifically, this review concentrates on the use of direct injection techniques, such as restricted-access materials, turbulent-flow chromatography and other automated on-line solid-phase extraction (SPE) procedures. It also includes short overviews of emerging automated extraction-phase technologies, such as molecularly imprinted polymers, in-tube solid-phase micro-extraction, and micro-extraction in a packed syringe for a more selective extraction of analytes from complex samples, providing further improvements in the analysis of biological materials. Lastly, the outlook for these methods and potential new applications for these technologies are briefly discussed.

Body Fluids↗