Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ENDOSCOPY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: prevalence, clinical, endoscopic and histopathological findings in 1,128 consecutive patients referred for endoscopy due to dyspeptic and reflux symptoms.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) reportedly has increased in prevalence while Helicobacter pylori infection and peptic ulcer disease have been on the decrease. The aim of the present study was to examine the prevalence of GERD as well as the clinical, endoscopic and histologic variables that associate with GERD in patients referred for endoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population was drawn from 1,562 consecutive patients referred for endoscopy. The exclusion criteria were previous H. pylori eradication, gastric surgery, anemia and weight loss. Thus 1,128 patients were enrolled in the present study. RESULTS: Of the 1,128 patients, 199 (18%) were referred for endoscopy due to heartburn and/or regurgitation. GERD, defined as chronic (>6 months) heartburn and/or regurgitation with or without erosive esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, esophageal ulcer or stricture, was detected in 248 (22%) patients. Of the 248 GERD patients, 81 (33%) had endoscopy-negative GERD, but of those aged <50 years (n = 67), 57 (85%) were endoscopy-negative. The overall incidence of GERD was 307 per 100,000 population/year and that of endoscopy-positive GERD 207/100,000/year. The positive and negative predictive values of heartburn and regurgitation for endoscopy-positive GERD were 0.37 (95% CI 0.31-0.44) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.88-0.92), respectively. Independent risk factors for GERD were male sex (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.7), previous medication for upper gastrointestinal symptoms (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.7-4.1), the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3-3. 0), histologic esophagitis (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.5-3.2) and incomplete intestinal metaplasia at the gastroesophageal junction (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-3.1). Chronic gastritis was protective against GERD (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.9). No association was observed between GERD and H. pylori infection. The risk of patients aged <50 years (n = 407) of having major lesion (Barrett's esophagus, esophageal stricture, peptic ulcer, esophageal/gastric carcinoma) was significantly lower than that of patients aged >50 years (n = 721; OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0. 9, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The correlation between reflux symptoms and endoscopy-positive GERD is poor and most GERD patients aged <50 years have endoscopy-negative GERD. The use of NSAIDs is a risk factor for GERD, whereas chronic gastritis, but not H. pylori infection, may protect against GERD. Incomplete intestinal metaplasia at the gastroesophageal junction is associated with GERD.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy on circulation in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in the elderly is increasingly becoming more common, despite the possibility that a minimal load on the circulation can cause serious complications such as shock and cardiac arrest. OBJECTIVE: The effects of endoscopy on the heart and the possibility of predicting circulatory accidents were studied using natriuretic peptide levels. METHODS: The patients were randomly chosen according to their age and divided into an elderly group (over 60 years of age, 64 patients) and a young group (under 30 years of age, 20 patients). The patients in the elderly group were further subdivided into two groups based on the presence or absence of circulatory complications (46 patients with circulatory complications and 18 without complications). The load on the heart was evaluated by measuring human atrial natriuretic peptide (hANP) and human brain natriuretic peptide (hBNP) which are secreted by the myocardial cells in response to cardiac load. Specimens were obtained before and after endoscopy. RESULTS: The hANP level was significantly higher after endoscopy in the elderly group, regardless of the presence or absence of circulatory complications. No significant difference was observed in the hBNP level. No significant increase in hANP or hBNP levels was observed after endoscopy in the young group. CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest an increased atrial load during endoscopy in the elderly. The increase in pulse rate during endoscopy is one possible cause of atrial load. Therefore, the risk of circulatory system damage must be recognized when endoscopy is performed in the elderly. The measurement of plasma hANP and hBNP levels may provide effective indices for evaluating cardiac load during endoscopy.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Diffusion of knowledge about Helicobacter pylori as assessed in an open-access endoscopy system: a prospective observational study based on the Maastricht guidelines.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Aim of the present study is to assess, according to the guidelines of the Maastricht Consensus Conference, the appropriateness and diagnostic yield of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open-access endoscopy system, in order to evaluate the diffusion of knowledge about Helicobacter pylori among different types of physicians. METHODS: Patients undergoing endoscopy because of dyspeptic symptoms were prospectively considered in 21 endoscopy services of Campania during two different 1-week periods in 1998 and 2001. The following data were recorded: age, sex, symptoms, history of peptic ulcer with regard to previous endoscopic or radiographic examinations and treatment, endoscopic diagnosis, and H. pylori status. The indication for endoscopy was evaluated according to Maastricht guidelines and current medical knowledge. RESULTS: In the two periods, 1998 and 2001, 706 and 520 patients were, respectively, considered. The two series were matched for demographic characteristics, symptoms, and endoscopic diagnosis. Endoscopy was considered not indicated in 398 patients (56.4%) in 1998 and in 265 patients (50.9%) in 2001 (p = NS). The majority of them, 288/398 (72.3%) in 1998 and 162/265 (61.1%) in 2001 (p = 0.001), had recently undergone endoscopy or radiology and empiric antisecretory treatment or eradication. They had been referred to endoscopy because of recurrence of symptoms or to assess healing. In 110 cases in 1998 (27.6%) and in 103 cases in 2001 (38.9%; p = 0.001) endoscopy was performed in dyspeptic patients younger than 45 years without alarm symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: 4 years after the Maastricht Conference, a large number of endoscopic examinations are not indicated and could be avoided following the Maastricht guidelines. In 2001, in comparison to 1998, a larger number of physicians are likely to investigate and treat correctly the H.-pylori-related diseases, but there are still some problems with the application of the 'test-and-treat policy'.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Digestive endoscopy is not a major risk factor for transmitting hepatitis C virus.

BACKGROUND: The potential role of digestive endoscopy as a mode for transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of digestive endoscopy in transmitting HCV by comparing the incidence of HCV infection in a cohort of patients undergoing endoscopy and in a cohort of blood donors. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: 3 endoscopic units and 2 blood banks in northwestern Italy. PATIENTS: The potentially exposed cohort consisted of 9188 outpatients consecutively recruited from 3 endoscopic units. Of 9008 patients negative for antibody to HCV (anti-HCV), 8260 (92%) were retested for anti-HCV 6 months after endoscopy. The unexposed cohort consisted of 51,230 healthy, anti-HCV-negative persons who donated blood at 2 blood banks in the same area and during the same time period; 38,280 of them (75%) were tested again for anti-HCV 6 to 48 months after the first blood donation (95,317 person-years of observation). MEASUREMENTS: Differences in the anti-HCV seroconversion rate between the exposed cohort (patients undergoing endoscopy) and the unexposed cohort (blood donors). Seroconversion was evaluated by a third-generation enzyme immunoassay for anti-HCV; persons positive for anti-HCV were tested for HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: All 8260 persons undergoing endoscopy remained negative for anti-HCV 6 months after the procedure (risk per 1000 persons, 0 [95% CI, 0 to 0.465]); in particular, none of the 912 patients who underwent endoscopy with the same instrument previously used on HCV carriers showed anti-HCV seroconversion (risk per 1000 persons, 0 [CI, 0 to 4.195]). Four blood donors became positive for anti-HCV and HCV RNA (mean follow-up, 2.49 years; 0.042 case per 1000 person-years [CI, 0.011 to 0.107 case per 1000 person-years]); each had undergone minor surgery before the second test. LIMITATIONS: In the endoscopy cohort, 8.3% of patients were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the hypothesis that properly performed digestive endoscopy is not a major risk factor for the transmission of HCV.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Endoscopy: throat spray or sedation?

Anxious patients tolerate endoscopy poorly. It was proposed that such patients might derive most benefit from sedation, while most non-anxious patients would prefer endoscopy with lignocaine throat spray alone. In a prospective study, 200 outpatients underwent diagnostic endoscopy after receiving one of two detailed information sheets which offered them either the choice between spray or sedation (n = 100) or the same choice but encouraged those who were anxious about endoscopy to choose sedation (n = 100). When given an informed choice, most non-anxious patients prefer not to be sedated most non-anxious patients prefer not to be sedated during diagnostic endoscopy. If patients who are anxious about the procedure are advised to choose sedation, those who nevertheless opt for topical throat spray alone find the endoscopy just as comfortable. If the endoscopy were to be repeated, 73% of the spray group and 77% of the sedation group would make the same choice again. Of 33 patients who chose spray but had been given only sedation for a previous endoscopy, 26 (79%) would choose spray again for a future endoscopy. The choice of spray or sedation should reflect the patient's view as well as that of the endoscopist.

Aerosols↗
PubMed1993

The value of endoscopy and endosonography in the diagnosis of the dysphagic patient.

The value of endoscopy in dysphagia is limited in the diagnosis of motility disorders and small structures, webs, and hiatal hernias. Endoscopy is of special use for the clarification of an organic cause of dysphagia. Intraluminal tumors can be seen and in a high percentage of cases be definitely diagnosed by taking biopsies; a malignant degeneration in Barrett's esophagus is detectable by endoscopy in 89.1% of cases. Gastroesophageal reflux disease can be diagnosed on endoscopy as it leads to an endoscopically visible inflammatory reaction; however, normal findings on endoscopy cannot exclude reflux disease. Endoscopy is the method of choice in the diagnosis of nonreflux esophagitis, especially Candida and viral esophagitis. A further advantage of endoscopy is the fact that a microscopic diagnosis can be obtained and endoscopic treatment can be performed simultaneously. Submucosal or extramural lesions can be missed by endoscopy. Endosonography, the combination of endoscopy and ultrasonography (EUS) yields additional information in diagnosing submucosal and extramural lesions of the esophagus which is missed by other imaging procedures. One of the main advantages of EUS is the detection of small and submucosal lesions. The most important indication is the local staging of esophageal carcinomas; the accuracy of endosonography in determining the depth of infiltration ranges between 79% and 92%. The detection of paraesophageal lymph nodes is successful in 60%-82%, although EUS cannot differentiate benign from malignant lymph nodes. Submucosal tumors can be visualized by endosonography and their size, echopattern, and the layers of origin can be determined with high accuracy. Further indications for EUS are the exclusion of focal lesions in achalasia or peptic strictures.

Deglutition Disorders↗
PubMed2005

Sensitivity of upper endoscopy in diagnosing esophageal cancer.

Esophageal cancer is a common cause of dysphagia and upper endoscopy is the accepted standard for making the diagnosis; however, the accuracy of endoscopy is not known. The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity of upper endoscopy in making the diagnosis of esophageal cancer in clinical practice. All patients with a new diagnosis of esophageal cancer from 1997 to 2001 in the Tumor Registry of Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center were identified. The medical records were reviewed to identify all patients who had undergone a previous endoscopy within two years that failed to diagnose esophageal cancer. The reason for failure was recorded. One hundred ten new cases of esophageal carcinoma were identified, and ten patients had had a previous false-negative endoscopy within two years for a sensitivity of 90.9% in clinical practice. The reasons for the failure of endoscopy were (1) lesion not seen in seven patients, (2) lesion seen and biopsied with benign histology in two patients, and (3) lesion seen but felt to be benign and not biopsied in one patient. Given the uncertain natural history of esophageal cancer, the data were also analyzed using a one-year window; this resulted in a sensitivity of 94.5%. The sensitivity of upper endoscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer in general clinical practice is 90.9% using a two-year window and 94.5% using a one-year window. Understanding the reasons for the failure of endoscopy may allow us to improve the practice of endoscopy.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Autofluorescence endoscopy for detection of high-grade dysplasia in short-segment Barrett's esophagus.

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of precancerous lesions, such as high-grade dysplasia, in patients with short-segment Barrett's esophagus is controversial. This study assessed the efficacy of autofluorescence endoscopy for detection of high-grade dysplasia in short-segment Barrett's esophagus. METHODS: A total of 34 patients (28 men, 6 women; age range 40-77 years) with histopathologically proven short-segment Barrett's esophagus were studied. Autofluorescence endoscopy was performed by using monochromatized blue light (425-455 nm) filtered from a conventional xenon light source. A total of 136 and 109 biopsy specimens were taken from Barrett's mucosa under control, respectively, white light endoscopy and autofluorescence endoscopy. RESULTS: High-grade dysplasia was found in 9 (8.3%) autofluorescence-guided biopsy specimens, which was significantly greater than the number of white light endoscopy-guided biopsy specimens with this finding (one positive biopsy specimen, 0.7% of total biopsy specimens obtained). Autofluorescence endoscopy detected high-grade dysplasia in 7 patients, 6 more than were identified with white light endoscopy. In the one patient with high-grade dysplasia detected by white light endoscopy-guided biopsy specimens, autofluorescence-guided biopsy specimens revealed only low-grade dysplasia. CONCLUSION: Autofluorescence endoscopy in patients with short-segment Barrett's esophagus increases the detection rate of high-grade dysplasia.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Risk of Helicobacter pylori transmission by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has been reported as a risk factor for the transmission of Helicobacter pylori. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of transmission of H. pylori infection by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients who had previously had such procedures in a low disinfection level environment. METHODS: The study included 1082 patients. Patients that had undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy or were treated with antibiotics 15 days before the index endoscopy were excluded. H. pylori infection was diagnosed by ultra-rapid urease test. Variables analyzed were age, gender, type of dyspepsia (organic or functional), and the number of previous upper gastrointestinal endoscopies. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of H. pylori infection was 60%. Patients ranged in age from 13 to 94 years (mean = 45.8, SD = 15.7) and the number of previous upper gastrointestinal endoscopies ranged from 0 to 20 (mean = 1.5, SD = 2.4). In 53.3% of the patients, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed some mucosal lesion (organic dyspepsia). Prevalence of H. pylori infection was higher in patients with organic rather than functional dyspepsia (71.1% vs. 47.1%, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean number of upper gastrointestinal endoscopies in patients with and without H. pylori infection. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that there was no association between history of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and current H. pylori infection in this study population.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Learning fibreoptic endoscopy. Nasotracheal or orotracheal intubations first?

We have studied the extent to which learning fibreoptic nasotracheal endoscopy first helped anaesthetists to learn fibreoptic orotracheal endoscopy later, and vice versa. After preliminary training on a bronchial tree model, 30 anaesthetic trainees were randomly allocated to the nasal first/oral second group, who performed 10 nasal intubations followed by 10 oral intubations, or the oral first/nasal second group, who performed 10 oral intubations followed by 10 nasal intubations, in anaesthetised, ASA group I or II patients undergoing elective oral or general surgery. Each type of endoscopy was taught in a standard manner, with the aid of an endoscopic video-camera system, under the supervision of experienced instructors. Performing nasal endoscopy second (average 70.8 s) took significantly less time than performing it first (average 84.4 s) and performing oral endoscopy second (average 35.2 s) took significantly less time than performing it first (average 48.5 s). The mean (SD) total endoscopy time for all the endoscopies (both nasal and oral) in the nasal first/oral second group [1196 (162) s] was not significantly different from that for all the endoscopies in the oral first/nasal second group [1193 (188) s]. Because there is no advantage or disadvantage to be gained in starting to learn either type of endoscopy first, graduated training programmes can be planned according to the availability of suitable patients for fibreoptic intubation, without instructors needing to consider whether trainees make better progress if they learn one technique before the other.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Barium enema and endoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia: sensitivity, specificity, complications and its determinants.

AIM: To analyse sensitivity, specificity and complication rate of endoscopy, and barium enema for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A MEDLINE search was performed (1980-2000) directed at the endoscopic and radiologic literature on barium enema. Articles were selected based on the type of study, availability of sensitivity and specificity values in sizeable patient groups, and reports on complications. Sixty articles were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Endoscopy proved to have superior sensitivity for polyps in patients at high-risk for colorectal neoplasia. The role of endoscopy and radiology in average-risk screening populations is not known. Sensitivity and specificity rates ranged widely, probably due to bias. For the detection of small polyps endoscopy has superior performance, whereas sensitivity is similar for endoscopy and barium enema for the detection of larger (>1 cm) polyps and tumours. Overall, endoscopy is associated with a higher complication rate. CONCLUSION: Endoscopy is the preferred detection method in high-risk patients. The role of endoscopy and radiology in a screening setting requires evaluation. This review provides the test characteristics of endoscopy and radiology which are relevant for a cost-effectiveness analysis. Double-contrast barium enema may play an important role for screening purposes, owing to its good sensitivity for detecting larger (>1 cm) polyps and its lack of major complications. de Zwart, I. M.et al. (2001). Clinical Radiology56, 401-409.

Barium Sulfate↗
PubMed2002

Routine endoscopy using a magnifying endoscope for gastric cancer diagnosis.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: It has been reported that the fine mucosal patterns of the gastric pits can be observed with magnification and this may assist in preliminary evaluation prior to histological diagnosis. The aim of this prospective study was to clarify the relationship between the fine mucosal patterns of gastric lesions and histological findings, and also to evaluate the usefulness of magnifying endoscopy during routine endoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A recently developed magnifying video endoscope, which enables magnification up to 80 times, was used for gastrointestinal endoscopy in 318 patients between January 2000 and January 2001, at the National Shikoku Cancer Center. In total, 232 lesions were detected. However, patients diagnosed by conventional endoscopy as having advanced gastric cancer, malignant lymphoma, or submucosal tumor were excluded from the study. The endoscopic findings for 211 lesions included in this study were compared with the histological findings. RESULTS: Coarse and irregular mucosal patterns were observed in elevated-type cancers by magnifying endoscopy, and in depressed-type cancers there was a finer pit pattern than in the surrounding mucosa, destruction or disappearance of the mucosal microstructure, and abnormal capillary vessels. The magnifying endoscopy results were closely related to the mucosal microstructure observed by dissecting microscopy and to the histological features. The rate of presumptive diagnosis of small gastric cancers was significantly higher when a magnifying endoscope was used compared with conventional endoscopy. In this study, the sensitivity and specificity of magnifying endoscopy as a diagnostic method were 96.0% and 95.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The fine mucosal patterns and the features of capillary vessels, which were identified with the magnifying endoscope, correlated well with the pathological diagnosis. Magnifying endoscopy will be very useful in predicting the histological diagnosis during routine endoscopic procedures.

Gastric Mucosa↗
PubMed2003

Capsule endoscopy versus push enteroscopy in patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Wireless capsule endoscopy is a new method enabling non-invasive diagnostic endoscopy of the entire small intestine. In this study we prospectively examined the diagnostic precision of capsule endoscopy compared with push enteroscopy in patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding. METHODS: Between July 2001 and October 2002 we examined 48 patients with suspected disorders of the small intestine using capsule endoscopy. 33 patients with obscure bleeding (19 men, 14 women, mean age 58 +/- 23 years) were prospectively examined using capsule endoscopy and push enteroscopy. RESULTS: On average, the patients had been suffering from chronic gastrointestinal bleeding for 30 +/- 36 (1-120) months. The lowest haemoglobin level was 6.5 +/- 1.6 g/dl (2.3-9.6) and on average 9 +/- 10 (0-50) blood units were transfused. Each patient underwent 4 +/- 2 (1-10) hospitalisations, with a mean 9 +/- 4 (5-17) diagnostic procedures before capsule endoscopy was used. Definitive bleeding sites were diagnosed by push enteroscopy in 7 patients (angiodysplasia [n = 5], ulcers [n = 1], multiple jejunal diverticula [n = 1]). Capsule endoscopy showed a bleeding source in 25 cases (76 %) (angiodysplasias [n = 15], Meckel's diverticulum [n = 1], ulcers [n = 7], ileum diverticulosis [n = 1], B-cell lymphoma [n = 1]). Push enteroscopy localised an additional bleeding source in comparison with capsule endoscopy (multiple jejunal diverticula) in one patient. Both methods of examination were safe and showed no complications. DISCUSSION: The present study shows that capsule endoscopy had the highest diagnostic yield and was superior to push enteroscopy in patients with chronic gastrointestinal bleeding. By using the capsule at an early stage the subsequent therapeutic procedure could be considerably shortened and diagnostic processes could possibly be optimised.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Multidirectional projectional rigid neuro-endoscopy: prototype and initial experience.

INTRODUCTION: The role of neuro-endoscopy is emerging. Traditional endoscopy is complicated by limited 2D views that make surgical interventions difficult. We have developed a rigid endoscope with a variable direction view that provides 3D visualization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prototype of the EndActive endoscope was used to examine 2 brain/intraventricular models. A 360-degree view is controlled via integrated joystick. Alternatively, the computer can volumetrically capture the ventricular surface. The captured video image can be viewed later or processed to create a flat projection map. The performance of this endoscope was compared to standard endoscopy with fixed directions of view. To simulate endoscopy, the center of the first brain model had eight labeled projections. The model was inspected with the multidirectional endoscope, standard rigid endoscopes (0-, 30- and 70-degree), and via a projection map. Ten neurosurgeons proficient in neuro-endoscopy were recruited for the experiments. The second brain model was labeled with 32 intraventricular tumors. RESULTS: With a 0-degree endoscope, only the number directly opposite the site of entry was visualized. With increasing angles, additional numbers were visualized. The 70-degree endoscope allowed 4 of 8 numbers to be visualized. Using the multidirectional endoscope, all 8 numbers were visualized. The multidirectional endoscope was more accurate in identifying markers compared to standard endoscopy (p = 0.031). The mean endoscopy times using the multidirectional endoscope and standard endoscopy were 143 and 117 seconds, respectively (p = 0.243). The best performance was obtained when the flat projection map was read (p < 0.01). Using the endoscope prototype, an average of 30.8 (96%) tumors was identified on the brain model. CONCLUSION: The EndActive endoscope is a rigid endoscope that provides complete visualization of a 3D space by controlling an adjustable viewing direction. In our study, the multidirectional endoscope provided superior visualization compared to standard endoscopy.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

Differences in clinical characteristics between patients with endoscopy-negative reflux disease and erosive esophagitis in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Helicobacter pylori infection and atrophic gastritis are inversely related to erosive esophagitis. Whether these factors affect the pathogenesis of endoscopy-negative reflux disease is not clear. We aimed to elucidate the differences in clinical characteristics between endoscopy-negative erosive disease and erosive esophagitis. METHODS: 253 subjects (89 with endoscopy-negative reflux disease and 164 with erosive esophagitis) were studied. Gastric atrophy was assessed by measurement of serum pepsinogen. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of endoscopy-negative reflux disease compared with erosive esophagitis. RESULTS: Among GERD patients, female gender (OR = 2.27, 95% CI, 1.25-4.10), smoking (OR = 0.45, 95% CI, 0.22-0.91), and the presence of hiatal hernia (OR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.17-0.56) were significantly associated with endoscopy-negative reflux disease compared with male gender, not smoking, and absence of hiatal hernia, respectively. Body mass index (BMI) was also significantly associated with a decreased OR for endoscopy-negative reflux disease. Although H. pylori infection and gastric atrophy were significantly more common in patients with endoscopy-negative reflux disease, these associations did not persist in a multiple-adjustment model. After adjustment for gender, BMI, smoking, and hiatal hernia, a decrease in serum pepsinogen I/II ratio was significantly associated with an increased OR for endoscopy-negative reflux disease (p for trend = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Female gender, low BMI, not smoking, absence of hiatal hernia, and severity of gastric atrophy were positively associated with endoscopy-negative reflux disease compared with erosive esophagitis among Japanese patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

The role of the surgeon in the evolution of flexible endoscopy.

Several cultures, including the Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, and Arabs, made attempts to view accessible human body cavities using a variety of instruments such as spatulas and specula. The first endoscope was created in 1806 when Phillip Bozzini, a German-born urologist, constructed the lichtleiter, which used concave mirrors to reflect candlelight through an open tube into the esophagus, bladder, or rectum. Maximilian Carl-Friedrich Nitze, another German urologist, produced the first usable cystoscope in 1877 by using series of lenses to increase magnification. He was also the first to place light inside the organ of interest to aid visualization. In 1880 Mikulicz made the first gastroscope using a system similar to Nitze's cystoscope. Modern endoscopy was born with the introduction of the fiberoptic endoscope in the late 1950s. Over the ensuing 50 years endoscopy revolutionized many aspects of the surgeon's practice. Endoscopy can now be used to diagnose and often treat gastrointestinal cancer, hemorrhage, obstruction, and inflammatory conditions. This review was initiated by the SAGES Flexible Endoscopy Committee to chronicle the role of the surgeon in the development and introduction of flexible endoscopy into clinical practice, historically and in contemporary surgery. Flexible endoscopy evolved out of surgeons' need to overcome diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. There have been many recent technological advances that facilitate endoluminal therapies, and flexible endoscopy is now traversing new ground. Surgeons have been major contributors in the development of all aspects of endoscopy. There is a continually expanding list of therapeutic options available to patients. The difficult questions of which procedure, on which patient, and when can be answered best by the surgeon versed in endoscopic, laparoscopic, and open surgical techniques.

Endoscopy↗
PubMed1997

Complications of surgical endoscopy. A decade of experience from a surgical residency training program.

BACKGROUND: This study examines the notion that gastrointestinal endoscopy performed by supervised surgical residents is safe. METHODS: We reviewed all gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures performed by surgical residents with faculty supervision for complications and deaths occurring up to 30 days following the procedures. RESULTS: The overall complication rate for 9,201 upper and lower endoscopy procedures was 1.4% and 0.42%, respectively. Overall mortality rate was 0.76% for upper endoscopy and 0.6% for lower endoscopy. No mortality was a direct result of a procedure-related complication. Intestinal perforation, drug overdose, bleeding, and aspiration were the most common procedure-related complications. Each resident completed an average of 75 upper endoscopies and 79 lower endoscopies during their training period. CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal endoscopy can be performed safely by surgical residents with appropriate supervision. The higher morbidity and mortality of upper endoscopy are most likely related to the underlying disease rather than the procedure. Awareness of common complications and application of appropriate precautions and instruction are critical for minimizing complications.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Early endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: associations with recurrent bleeding, surgery, and length of hospital stay.

BACKGROUND: The impact of upper endoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage treated in community practice is unknown. Thus we examined the effectiveness of endoscopy performed within 24 hours of admission (early endoscopy). METHODS: Medical records of 909 consecutive hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage who underwent endoscopy at 13 hospitals in a large metropolitan area were reviewed. We evaluated unadjusted and severity-adjusted associations of early endoscopy with recurrent bleeding or surgery to control hemorrhage, length of hospital stay, and associations of endoscopic therapy in patients with bleeding ulcers or varices. RESULTS: Early endoscopy was performed in 64% of patients and compared with delayed endoscopy and was associated with clinically significant reductions in adjusted risk of recurrent bleeding or surgery (odds ratio [OR] 0.70: 95% CI [0.44, 1.13]) and a 31% decrease in adjusted length of stay (95% CI: [24%, 37%]). In patients at high risk for recurrent bleeding, the use of early endoscopic therapy to control hemorrhage was associated with reductions in recurrent bleeding or surgery (OR 0.21: 95% CI [0.10, 0.47]) and length of stay (-31%: 95% CI [-44%, -14%). CONCLUSION: In this study of community-based practice, the routine use of endoscopy, and in selected cases endoscopic therapy, performed early in the clinical course of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage was associated with reductions in length of stay and, possibly, the risk of recurrent bleeding and surgery.

Adult↗