Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ACCREDITATION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15Linked to original sources

[Accreditation for ambulatory health care in the USA].

In the United States of America, accreditation relevant to ambulatory health care provided by physicians relates to several levels in the health care system: to the managed care organizations setting the frame for the care provided, the ambulatory care organizations (e.g., ambulatory surgery centers, group practices), and--for some time--individual physicians. Several accrediting organizations play a role in accreditation in ambulatory care. The functions of accreditation, the accreditation procedures as well as important areas addressed by the standards are described, and possible suggestions for respective methods of external quality assurance in Germany are reflected on.

Accreditation↗

The current status of forensic science laboratory accreditation in Europe.

Forensic science is gaining some solid ground in the area of effective crime prevention, especially in the areas where more sophisticated use of available technology is prevalent. All it takes is high-level cooperation among nations that can help them deal with criminality that adopts a cross-border nature more and more. It is apparent that cooperation will not be enough on its own and this development will require a network of qualified forensic laboratories spread over Europe. It is argued in this paper that forensic science laboratories play an important role in the fight against crime. Another, complimentary argument is that forensic science laboratories need to be better involved in the fight against crime. For this to be achieved, a good level of cooperation should be established and maintained. It is also noted that harmonization is required for such cooperation and seeking accreditation according to an internationally acceptable standard, such as ISO/IEC 17025, will eventually bring harmonization as an end result. Because, ISO/IEC 17025 as an international standard, has been a tool that helps forensic science laboratories in the current trend towards accreditation that can be observed not only in Europe, but also in the rest of the world of forensic science. In the introduction part, ISO/IEC 17025 states that "the acceptance of testing and calibration results between countries should be facilitated if laboratories comply with this international standard and if they obtain accreditation from bodies which have entered into mutual recognition agreements with equivalent bodies in other countries using this international standard." Furthermore, it is emphasized that the use of this international standard will assist in the harmonization of standards and procedures. The background of forensic science cooperation in Europe will be explained by using an existing European forensic science network, i.e. ENFSI, in order to understand the current status of forensic science in Europe better. The Council of Europe and the European Union approaches to forensic science will also be discussed by looking at the legal instruments and documents published by these two European organizations. Data collected from 52 European forensic science laboratories will be examined and findings will be evaluated from a quality assurance and accreditation point of view. The need for harmonization and accreditation in forensic science will be emphasized. The steps that should be taken at the European level for increasing and strengthening the role of European forensic science laboratories in the fight against crime will be given as recommendations in the conclusion.

Accreditation↗

Accreditation and certification in dermatologic surgery.

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) is an agency that accredits residency-training programs, thus assuring the public of the highest-quality medical education in the United States. Only those residents who complete ACGME-accredited programs qualify for certification by an American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS)-sponsored board. Certification by the ABMS assures the public that a physician has become competent in a defined body of medical knowledge. Because medicine continuously evolves, the ACGME and the ABMS sponsor a process by which new specialties or subspecialties can be defined, programs accredited, and physicians certified. Procedural dermatology is a surgical subspecialty of dermatology that includes cutaneous oncology (along with Mohs micrographic surgery), cutaneous reconstructive surgery, and cosmetic surgery of the skin. The recent approval by the ACGME to accredit procedural dermatology fellowships establishes the specialty of dermatology as an organ-based body of knowledge that includes medical, pathologic, and surgical skills.

Accreditation↗

Accreditation for ultrasound in the world.

To assess accreditation for ultrasound (US) throughout the world, a questionnaire was sent to 34 doctors in 34 countries; 23 of them responded. Clinical specialties are approved by law in the large majority of countries, except for a few countries like the USA or Japan. The position of "Sonologist", who is a specialist for US, has not been established in any of the countries with the exception of China. In some countries, some kinds of technicians are permitted to be involved in US after training and the recipients of such accreditation are usually called "Sonographers." Accreditation systems for US in various countries were classified into three grades, namely, "Should," "Would" and "Might," according to differences in regulations, education and certification. In 19 out of 23 countries, grading fell into the "Might" grade, in which accreditation is thought to be no more than a matter of morals. It is concluded that a respective accreditation system suitable to the country would be constructed independently.

Accreditation↗

Accreditation of ambulatory surgery centers.

Ambulatory surgery centers are flourishing in the United States. Accreditation of these unique facilities by the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care reflects a commitment to quality, patient-centered care and to excellence in this specialty area. The accreditation process is complex and lengthy; the benefits, however, outweigh the disadvantages. By successfully completing the accreditation process, a facility demonstrates to the public, its patients, and other health care professionals that it provides exemplary ambulatory surgical care. Successfully accredited facilities also have competitive advantages over nonaccredited surgical centers.

Accreditation↗

Accreditation and the use of outcomes-oriented information systems.

Rehabilitation programs of all types and sizes must be able to use information technology to respond to both internal and external forces. One can anticipate that consumer-driven care will mean a desire for and access to more public information about health plans, specialty components of health care (eg, rehabilitation), and the quality of plans and providers. Providers need information with which to plan and manage their outcomes and resource allocation, to monitor and improve the quality of services, and to communicate with external stakeholders. The Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) has for more than two decades required accredited organizations to have active outcome-oriented program evaluation systems. Yet, accreditation requirements have historically been process-oriented. This process orientation is now evolving toward an outcome orientation, both in the accreditation environment at large, and at CARF. This article describes these outcome-oriented initiatives, including CARF SCoRsSM, a standards conformance rating system under development at CARF, and a project to identify a limited, uniform set of performance indicators for rehabilitation programs. In addition, the article reflects on the significance of a potential National Information System for brain injury to the accreditation and outcomes arena.

Accreditation↗

Accreditation of external quality assessment schemes in the United Kingdom.

There are some 130 pathology external quality assessment schemes available in the United Kingdom. Most are provided from within the National Health Service, but a few from the private sector. At the invitation of the Department of Health, Clinical Pathology Accreditation (UK) Ltd. has developed an accreditation system for these schemes. Accreditation is based on scheme organisers declaring compliance with 62 standards and an on-site inspection. As of the end of 2000, 105 schemes have been accredited. Most of the schemes in the disciplines of Clinical Biochemistry, Haematology, Immunology and Microbiology have now been accredited, but progress has been slower in non-numerical schemes in the disciplines of Cellular Pathology and Genetics.

Accreditation↗

JCAHO accreditation considerations for the home care WOC nurse.

Driven by competition and by pressure from managed care groups, home health care organizations are increasingly choosing to seek the accreditation offered by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO). WOC nurses practice in a variety of health care settings, including home health care. Many home health care organizations are now accredited, or they will choose to become accredited in the future. This article reviews home care accreditation standards as set forth by JCAHO and the possible impact of the standards on individual WOC home care nursing practice.

Community Health Nursing↗

Hospital accreditation and the surgeon: the Canadian experience.

Accreditation is an internationally recognised process through which healthcare organisations are able to improve the safety and quality of services delivered to patients. The focus of accreditation is to help organisations understand what they are doing well and what opportunities are available for improvement. The Canadian approach to accreditation is a rigorous peer review process comprised of a self-assessment against a set of standards, an on-site survey and follow-up action on recommendations that arise from the survey. The accreditation standards can be used effectively to guide the surgical teams in the transformation of the specialty. The 17 standards that are used to evaluate surgical teams relate to the activities that represent the continuum of clinical care as well as aspects related to learning. Within the subsections and standards are opportunities for surgeons and surgical teams to use the standards to effectively deliver services and to continuously improve patient care. In 38 recent Canadian Accreditation AIM surveys, that included at least one surgical team, there were a total of 75 recommendations made to the teams. Most recommendations related to process as opposed to outcome issues, implying that surgeons need to become more proactive in the functioning of the surgical team and to participate more effectively in management issues related to surgical care. Attention to these details will position surgical programmes to effectively deal with the rapid pace of change that is inherent in a modern surgical practice.

Accreditation↗

Accreditation in European health care.

BACKGROUND: In the past 15 years many countries, with widely differing health systems, have established national accreditation programs. A European survey report on accreditation, which includes data and updates from 2003 that were submitted between January and October 2004, is summarized. METHODS: A one-page questionnaire was circulated, with the summary of the 2002 survey, in February 2004 to known contacts in 44 of the larger states in the European Region of the World Health Organization. Combining the surveys of 2000, 2002, and 2004, responses were received from 36 of the 44 larger countries of the European Region from which information was sought. FINDINGS: The number of national accreditation programs for health services has continued to grow since the mid-1990s. By 2004, 26 programs were active or in development in 18 countries. The "English-speaking" model of North America remains the leading influence; however, newer programs are increasingly influenced by other models. Governmental programs are more likely to publish findings of accreditation assessments, and more recent programs are more likely to make results public. DISCUSSION: Accreditation programs are being set up more frequently in Europe than anywhere else; the trend is from voluntary, confidential, and self-financed organizational development toward benign but transparent regulation of stakeholders, governmental support, and public funding. Programs vary widely, yet patient and staff mobility, cross-border purchasing, freedom of trade, and protection of public safety and patients' rights imply the need for a common approach to definition, assessment, and improvement of standards in health care.

Accreditation↗

[Mental health department accreditation. Classification and assessment criteria].

AIMS: To compare different accreditation categories in Italy and to suggest some criteria to assess them. METHODS: The A. compare specific characteristics of different model of normative and professional accreditation and suggest some criteria to distinguish different type of accreditation programme and to assess quality and usefulness of an accreditation programme. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Different types of accreditation are attributed to some basic criteria: voluntary/by law, high/low standard, assessment object. Criteria to assess the usefulness are: check list accuracy, support to quality improvement, documental burden, services impact.

Accreditation↗

Accreditation and quality approach in operating theatre departments: the French approach.

Since 1996, French health establishments are subjected to a process of evaluating the quality of care, called "accreditation". This process was controlled by ANAES, which, after January 1st, 2005 became the Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS). The accreditation is characterized by a dual process of self-assessment and external audit, leading to four levels of accreditation. In spite of requiring a time-consuming methodology, this approach provides an important means of consolidating the development of the quality approach and re-stimulating the compliance of establishments with standards of safety and vigilance. The professional teams of many French operating theatre departments have been able to use the regulatory and restricting framework of accreditation to organize quality approaches specific to the operative system, supported by the organizational structures of the department such as the operating suite committee, departmental boards and the steering group. Based on quality guidelines including a commitment from the manager and operating suite committee, as well as a quality flow chart and a quality system, these teams describe the main procedures for running the operating theatre. They also organize the follow-up of incidents and undesirable events, along with the risks and points to watch. Audits of the operative system are planned on a regular basis. The second version of the accreditation process considerably reinforces the assessment of professional practices by evaluating the relevance, the risks and the methods of managing care for pathologies. It will make it possible to implement assessments of the health care provided by operating theatre departments and will reinforce the importance of search for quality.

Accreditation↗

The evolution of external quality evaluation: observations from the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.

The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, the oldest health care accrediting body in the world, currently accredits almost 20000 organizations in the USA. Although continuing to be professionally-sponsored, accreditation's rapid growth in recent years has been driven by the external users of accreditation--government, purchasers, and public--rather than by the original users, the professionals themselves. This experience in the USA suggests that over time successful external quality evaluation mechanisms throughout the world will involve representatives of the public, purchasers, and government in establishing standards and setting policies. Without this involvement, these stakeholders are unlikely to find the mechanisms credible in addressing their needs, and will seek alternatives--adding cost and duplication to the external quality evaluation system. Successful mechanisms are also likely to provide more detailed information about an organization's performance to the public, purchasers, and the government, while creating evaluation processes that provide for innovation and support improvement in efficiency, as well as quality, through incorporation of aspects of the Baldrige and European Foundation for Quality Management approaches to organizational excellence. Finally, successful evaluation mechanisms are likely to create a special focus on the safety of care, incorporating aspects of the International Organization for Standardization's ISO 9000 approach to quality management. While the specific nature, priority, and timing of these changes will differ from country to country, they are likely to influence the evolution of external quality evaluation throughout the world. External evaluation of health care organizations' quality holds great promise, but its long-term success depends on responding to all those who will want to depend on it.

Diffusion of Innovation↗

Quality programmes, accreditation and certification in Switzerland.

PURPOSE: To report on current quality initiatives in health care in the context of accreditation and certification in Switzerland. SOURCE OF INFORMATION: A review from the Swiss Accreditation Service, the Swiss Medical Association and the University of Zurich. SETTING: In Switzerland, health care providers and health insurers are obliged by law to sign contracts on quality of care. The law texts and related ordinances do not state explicitly the content and format of quality contracts between providers and costs payers. Finding adequate practical solutions is the responsibility of the partners involved. Six different possibilities of quality initiatives are studied and discussed in this report. These include initiatives to create independent certification or inspection bodies for health care organizations accredited by the national accreditation body. FINDINGS: So far, there is only one established standardized system with clear requirements. This accreditation and certification model is an adaptation of the International Standards Organization but so far it has not been used often in the public domain. Each of the other five approaches are more frequently applied but none of them lead to full external peer review certification including medical outcome yet. CONCLUSIONS: A lot of harmonization work still has to be done and clear branch specific requirements need to be agreed upon. Practicability and validity of external peer review schemes may also need further evaluation and improvement to reach the goals of health care systems in the future.

Accreditation↗

Relative importance of designation and accreditation of trauma centers during evolution of a regional trauma system.

BACKGROUND: Improved survival after injury has been demonstrated with trauma system implementation and designation of trauma centers. Local designating health authorities or national verification (United States) or accreditation (Canada) programs audit trauma center performance. The relative importance of designation versus accreditation with respect to improved outcomes is not clear. The purpose of this study was to measure outcomes within a single regional trauma system after designation of trauma centers and to compare outcomes in the one accredited center to the nonaccredited centers. METHODS: Data from three trauma centers were studied. All were large, university-affiliated regional medical centers, integrated into a regional trauma system and served by a single ambulance service. The study period was 1992 to 1999, immediately after trauma center designation in 1991. The British Columbia Trauma Registry was used to identify trauma patients, mechanism of injury, length of stay, case mix, case volume, acuity, pediatric caseload, and proportion of transfers at each center. A questionnaire was circulated to each hospital to determine the level of institutional support and programmatic development for trauma. The Trauma Registry was used to calculate z scores (TRISS methodology) for each center and TRISS-adjusted mortality odds ratios between institutions. Differences in covariables were controlled for in subgroup analysis. RESULTS: Two centers (hospitals A and C) had a high trauma caseload; one (hospital B) had a small and diminishing caseload. Only one center (hospital A) developed a trauma program consistent with Canadian accreditation criteria; z scores for center A were consistently better than at hospital B or C and survival odds ratios were significant. This finding applied to the total trauma population, blunt adult trauma patients (whether or not transfers and hip fracture patients were excluded), and in the more severely injured blunt trauma subgroups. There were no differences between hospitals for the relatively small number of patients with penetrating trauma. CONCLUSION: Differences between hospitals were apparent from the outset of the trauma system. However, designation as a trauma center does not appear to necessarily improve survival in large regional medical centers. Development of a trauma program and commitment to meeting national guidelines through the accreditation process does appear to be associated with improved outcome after injury.

Accreditation↗

A comparison of NLNAC and CCNE accreditation.

Baccalaureate and graduate nursing education programs now have a choice of professional accrediting bodies and must make a decision about which best suits the needs of their individual programs. The authors describe the accreditation process and procedures of the National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission and the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education. The purpose, philosophy, standards, accreditation process, fees, review cycle, and length of accreditation are compared.

Accreditation↗

Need for reform in health professions accrediting.

At least 50 vocational or professional groups, exclusive of specialties within categories, now provide a health service. Many have established accrediting procedures for maintaining educational standards, and the number is increasing. So great is the demand from the accrediting bodies that universities and academic health centers find that the cost in terms of money, time, and duplication of effort has become exhorbitant, and thereby a major problem in the management of educational institutions. The duplication of effort leads to fragmentation of the entire accrediting process, and this, in turn, fosters inadequate sharing of health professions educational experiences. A model is presented that would lessen the burden of accrediting on educational institutions and simultaneously permit testing of the feasibility of a multiprofessional accrediting mechanism.

Accreditation↗

Health service accreditation: report of a pilot programme for community hospitals.

Voluntary accreditation in the United Kingdom is being used by health care providers to improve and market their services and by commissioners to define and monitor service contracts. In a three year pilot scheme in the south west of England, 43 out of 57 eligible community hospitals volunteered to be surveyed; 37 of them were ultimately accredited for up to two years by the hospital accreditation programme. The main causes for non-accreditation related to safety, clinical records, and medical organisation. Follow up visits in 10 hospitals showed that, overall, 69% of recommendations were implemented. An independent survey of participating hospitals showed the perceived benefits to include team building, review of operational policies, improvement of data systems, and the generation of local prestige. Purchasers are increasingly influenced by accreditation status but are mostly unwilling to finance the process directly. None the less, the concept may become an important factor moderating the quality of service in the new NHS.

Accreditation↗