Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Ventricular Function, Right”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14Linked to original sources
PubMed1987

[Pre- and post-operative right ventricular functions in valvular heart diseases: the significance of noninvasive assessment].

This investigation was undertaken to evaluate right ventricular function in valvular heart diseases by calculating right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) from first-pass radionuclide angiography (RNA). One hundred cases of valvular heart disease were examined by RNA, 93 of whom underwent cardiac catheterization and contrast left ventriculography, preoperatively. Fifty of the 100 cases were examined by RNA; 18 by cardiac catheterization post-operatively. The results were as follows: 1. In 49 cases of mitral valve disease, there was a correlation (r = -0.75) between pulmonary artery mean pressure (PAm) and RVEF. This suggested that afterload of left atrial pressure elevation induced a decrease in RVEF. 2. Although PAm did not increase so much in aortic valve disease, RVEF decreased in some cases, especially in those having massive aortic stenosis or regurgitation. In 22 cases of aortic regurgitation which had normal PAm and a left ventricular-aortic systolic pressure gradient less than 50 mmHg, there was a correlation (r = -0.69) between the RVEF and the left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI). 3. Although post-operative RVEF did not improve significantly in mitral valve disease, it increased significantly in the early post-operative period in aortic valve disease. Also, the increase in RVEF and the decrease in LVEDVI seemed to correlate closely in aortic valve disease. It was speculated that pre-operative decrease of RVEF is derived from a deformity of the RV caused by pressure from the enlarged or thickened LV, and that post-operative increase of RVEF is dependent upon a decrease of LV size and volume.

Erythrocytes↗
PubMed1995

Right ventricular function and plasma atrial natriuretic peptide levels during fiberbronchoscopic alveolar lavage in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of fiberbronchoscopic alveolar lavage on hemodynamics, right ventricular function, and plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) concentrations in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. DESIGN: Prospective investigation. SETTING: Eight-bed ICU of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Fourteen patients with cardiovascular instability due to a systemic inflammatory response syndrome who were mechanically ventilated. INTERVENTIONS: Fiberbronchoscopic alveolar lavage after fluid replacement, deep sedation, and paralyzation. Intervention time: 10 min. After inspection of the endobronchial system, one lavage of 40 mL sterile saline solution was instilled in each lung and recovered. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The fiberbronchoscopic procedure induced a prompt increase in mean pulmonary arterial pressure after 3 min (median[range]: 25 [13 to 39] to 30 [19 to 45] mm Hg, p < 0.05), which increased further after 6 min (34 [17 to 46] mm Hg, p < 0.01). Cardiac index increased simultaneously (4.25 [3.1 to 5.7] to 4.85 [4.3 to 6.9] L/min.m2 after 6 min, p < 0.01), whereas mean arterial pressure and heart rate remained unchanged. Central venous pressure rose from 12 (3 to 18) mm Hg before procedure to 14 (4 to 20) mm Hg after 6 min (p < 0.01). The right ventricular function was measured using a "fast response" ejection fraction thermodilution catheter: end-diastolic volume increased (238 [137 to 358] to 280 [150 to 4ll] mL after 9 min, p < 0.05), as well as stroke volume (88 [54 to 113] to 103 [67 to 153] mL after 9 min, p < 0.01). Right ventricular ejection fraction (37 [25 to 50] %) did not change significantly during the procedure, but the stroke work index was reinforced (8.2 [4.7 to 15.7] to 13.3 [2.4 to 41.3] gm.M/M2 after 6 min, p < 0.01). Plasma c-ANP concentration rose from 135 (24 to 350) to 196.5 (44 to 830 pg/ml after 20 min (p < 0.05). Systemic vascular resistance decreased from 533 (390 to 1,042) to 429 (281 to 684) dynes.s/cm5 after removal of the bronchoscope (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although acute pulmonary hypertension was observed during the fiberbronchoscopic procedure, the right ventricular performance did not deteriorate in hemodynamically unstable patients. To maintain a "hyperdynamic cardiovascular state," the right ventricular stroke work was reinforced, presumably by the "Frank-Starling mechanism." We assume that the acute distention of the right side of the heart resulted in elevated ANP concentrations. The marked decrease in systemic vascular resistance might be due to high ANP levels.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Magnetic resonance imaging vs. ultrafast computed tomography for cardiac diagnosis.

Ultrafast computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) generate high resolution tomographic cardiac images. Ultrafast CT requires intravenous injection of x-ray contrast combined with an image acquisition time of 50 msec. MRI requires no contrast injection, but has relatively long acquisition times due to gating. Both technologies can be used to evaluate cardiac chamber and great vessel dimensions, intracardiac and extracardiac masses, ventricular hypertrophy, left ventricular mass, congenital heart disease, regional and global left ventricular function, right ventricular function and pericardium. MRI is highly useful for detection and semi-quantitation of valvular regurgitation while ultrafast CT is not. Aortic and mitral valve stenosis can be detected by both, but MRI is the preferred study. Though both techniques can be used to assess coronary artery bypass graft status, ultrafast CT is the preferred method. It is concluded that ultrafast CT and MRI have broad applications for cardiac diagnosis.

Coronary Disease↗
PubMed2002

Noninvasive estimation of both systolic and diastolic pulmonary artery pressure from Doppler analysis of tricuspid regurgitant velocity spectrum in patients with chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive estimation of pulmonary artery systolic and diastolic pressures usually requires the investigation of both tricuspid and pulmonary regurgitant jets and an estimate of right atrial pressure. A new, noninvasive method to obtain pulmonary diastolic pressure (based on the hemodynamic demonstration that right ventricular systolic pressure and pulmonary artery diastolic pressure are equal at the time of pulmonary valve opening) from the analysis of tricuspid regurgitation alone has been described in a small cohort of patients. We sought to verify the accuracy of this method in a large population of patients with heart failure. METHODS: An estimate of pulmonary artery diastolic pressure was obtained by transposing the pulmonary opening time (from the onset of the R wave on the electrocardiographic tracing to the beginning of pulmonic forward flow on Doppler examination) onto the tricuspid regurgitant velocity curve and calculating the pulmonary artery diastolic pressure value as the pressure gradient between the right ventricle and right atrium at this time. The study group included 86 consecutive patients (64 men, aged 52 +/- 11 years) with heart failure (New York Heart Association class > or =II, 94%) who were in stable clinical condition with a chiefly idiopathic (57%), ischemic (24%), or other form (13%) of dilated cardiomyopathy. Noninvasive, right-sided pressures were compared with invasive measurements obtained during right heart catheterization performed within 24 hours. The Bland and Altman graphic method was used together with the calculation of the Lin concordance correlation coefficient and its 95% CI to assess the agreement between hemodynamic and echocardiographic measurements. RESULTS: Catheter-derived pulmonary artery systolic pressure ranged from 8 to 119 mm Hg (mean 42 +/- 21 mm Hg), pulmonary artery diastolic pressure from 1 to 59 mm Hg (mean 20 +/- 11 mm Hg), and right atrial pressure from -5 to 20 mm Hg (mean 6 +/- 5 mm Hg). Tricuspid regurgitation was detected in 75 of 86 patients (87%). Pulmonary artery systolic pressure ranged from 13 to 110 mm Hg (mean 44 +/- 21 mm Hg); the pressure gradient between the right ventricle and right atrium at time t of the pulmonary valve opening on the tricuspid regurgitation velocity curve was measurable in 70 of 75 (93%) cases and ranged from 3.5 to 64 mm Hg (mean 22 +/- 11 mm Hg). Good agreement was observed not only for pulmonary artery systolic pressure but also for pulmonary artery diastolic pressure, based on the analysis of the tricuspid regurgitation velocity jet, with a slight difference between measurements (-1.8 and 0.1, respectively), no evident pattern of point scattering, and a high concordance correlation coefficient that was elicited by the virtually total overlapping of lines on the graph. Overall results were not significantly different whether patients with depressed right ventricular function (right ventricular ejection fraction < or =35%), with a tricuspid regurgitation grade > or =2 and atrial fibrillation were included in the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The narrow paired difference for the estimate of pulmonary artery systolic pressure and the even better difference for pulmonary artery diastolic pressure using the tricuspid regurgitation velocity curve analysis indicates that this new method reliably estimates invasive right-sided pressures over a wide range of pressure values in patients with heart failure. The overall good correlation with invasive values indicates that Doppler examination of tricuspid regurgitation alone may provide a simple and comprehensive new method for the noninvasive evaluation of right ventricular and pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with heart failure.

Blood Pressure↗