Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Repression domains”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Gene structure and evolution of Tieg3, a new member of the Tieg family of proteins.

TGF beta-inducible immediate early gene, Tieg, belongs to the superfamily of Sp1-like transcription factors containing three C(2)H(2)-zinc finger DNA binding motifs close to the C-terminus. So far, Tieg1 and Tieg2 have been identified in human and mouse. We identified Tieg3, a new member of the Tieg protein family by screening a mouse cDNA library. Tieg3 has almost all the known features of the Tieg protein family: it shares a highly conserved C(2)H(2) zinc finger DNA binding domain and is 96% identical to Tieg2 and 86% to Tieg1, respectively. In addition, the three repression domains at the N-terminus, R1, R2 and R3 are conserved in all the Tiegs. Similar to Tieg1 and Tieg2, Tieg3 mRNA is up-regulated in response to TGF beta 1 treatment and can perform the Sp1 sites mediated repression of transcription. A 4 kilobase (kb) long transcript of mouse Tieg3 can be detected using Northern-blot analysis. The gene of mouse Tieg3 contains four exons. Due to the amino acid sequence similarity, mouse Tieg2 is regarded as an orthologue of human Tieg2. However, the mouse Tieg3 gene is localized in a conserved segment on mouse chromosome 12 corresponding to human Tieg2 on chromosome 2 with the same gene order. An interesting explanation for this apparent contradiction might be a homologous recombination leading to loci exchange between the mouse Tieg3 and Tieg2.

Alternative Splicing↗
PubMed2002

Studies of a positive supercoiling machine. Nucleotide hydrolysis and a multifunctional "latch" in the mechanism of reverse gyrase.

Reverse gyrase, the only topoisomerase known to positively supercoil DNA, has an N-terminal ATPase domain that drives the activity of a topoisomerase domain. This study shows that the N-terminal domain represses topoisomerase activity in the absence of nucleotide, and nucleotide binding is sufficient to relieve the repression. A "latch" region in the N-terminal part was observed to close over the topoisomerase domain in the reverse gyrase crystal structure. Mutants lacking all or part of the latch relax DNA in the absence of nucleotide, indicating that this region mediates topoisomerase repression. The mutants also show altered DNA-dependent ATPase activity, suggesting that the latch may be involved in coupling nucleotide hydrolysis to supercoiling. It is not required for this process, however, because the mutants can still positively supercoil DNA. Nucleotide hydrolysis is essential to the specificity of reverse gyrase for increasing the linking number of DNA. Although with ATP the enzyme performs strand passage always toward increasing linking number, it can increase or decrease the linking number in the presence of a nonhydrolyzable ATP analog. This suggests that the mechanism of reverse gyrase is best described by a combination of recently proposed models.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed2005

Jumonji represses alpha-cardiac myosin heavy chain expression via inhibiting MEF2 activity.

Expression of alpha-cardiac myosin heavy chain gene (alphaMHC) is developmentally regulated in normal embryonic hearts and down-regulated in cardiac myopathy and failing hearts. Jumonji (JMJ) has been shown to be critical for normal cardiovascular development and functions as a transcriptional repressor. Here, we demonstrate that JMJ represses alphaMHC expression through inhibition of myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) activity. In primary cardiomyocytes, overexpression of JMJ leads to marked reduction of endogenous alphaMHC expression. JMJ represses the synergistic activation of alphaMHC by MEF2 and thyroid hormone receptor (TR). Interestingly, JMJ inhibits transcriptional activities of all MEF2 isoforms, but not the TR-dependent activation. The transcriptional repression domain of JMJ interacts with the N-terminal part of MEF2A, resulting in the repression of MEF2A activities. These results suggest that JMJ represses alphaMHC expression via protein-protein interaction with MEF2A.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Engineering zinc finger protein transcription factors: the therapeutic relevance of switching endogenous gene expression on or off at command.

Modulating gene expression directly at the DNA level represents a novel approach to control cellular processes. In this respect, zinc finger protein DNA-binding domains can be engineered to target virtually any gene. Coupling of a transcription activation or repression domain to these zinc fingers permits regulating gene expression at will, providing a platform of unlimited therapeutic applications. In this review, steps involved in the engineering of zinc finger protein transcription factors are described. In addition, an overview of endogenous genes successfully targeted for modulating expression by engineered zinc finger protein transcription factors is given. So far, research has mainly focused on targeting genes involved in cancer and angiogenesis, with encouraging evaluation in vivo and progression into a clinical trial. Altogether, engineered zinc finger proteins offer a new and exciting direction in the field of medical research with promising prospects.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Adenovirus E1A N-terminal amino acid sequence requirements for repression of transcription in vitro and in vivo correlate with those required for E1A interference with TBP-TATA complex formation.

The adenovirus (Ad) E1A 243R oncoprotein encodes an N-terminal transcription repression domain that is essential for early viral functions, cell immortalization, and cell transformation. The transcription repression function requires sequences within amino acids 1 to 30 and 48 to 60. To elucidate the roles of the TATA-binding protein (TBP), p300, and the CREB-binding protein (CBP) in the mechanism(s) of E1A repression, we have constructed 29 amino acid substitution mutants and 5 deletion mutants spanning the first 30 amino acids within the E1A 1-80 polypeptide backbone. These mutant E1A polypeptides were characterized with regard to six parameters: the ability to repress transcription in vitro and in vivo, to disrupt TBP-TATA box interaction, and to bind TBP, p300, and CBP. Two regions within E1A residues 1 to 30, amino acids 2 to 6 and amino acid 20, are critical for E1A transcription repression in vitro and in vivo and for the ability to interfere with TBP-TATA interaction. Replacement of 6Cys with Ala in the first region yields the most defective mutant. Replacement of 20Leu with Ala, but not substitutions in flanking residues, yields a substantially defective phenotype. Protein binding assays demonstrate that replacement of 6Cys with Ala yields a mutant completely defective in interaction with TBP, p300, and CBP. Our findings are consistent with a model in which the E1A repression function involves interaction of E1A with p300/CBP and interference with the formation of a TBP-TATA box complex.

Adenovirus E1A Proteins↗
PubMed2004

Transcriptional and DNA binding activity of the Foxp1/2/4 family is modulated by heterotypic and homotypic protein interactions.

Foxp1, Foxp2, and Foxp4 are large multidomain transcriptional regulators belonging to the family of winged-helix DNA binding proteins known as the Fox family. Foxp1 and Foxp2 have been shown to act as transcriptional repressors, while regulatory activity of the recently identified Foxp4 has not been determined. Given the importance of this Fox gene subfamily in neural and lung development, we sought to elucidate the mechanisms by which Foxp1, Foxp2, and Foxp4 repress gene transcription. We show that like Foxp1 and Foxp2, Foxp4 represses transcription. Analysis of the N-terminal repression domain in Foxp1, Foxp2, and Foxp4 shows that this region contains two separate and distinct repression subdomains that are highly homologous termed subdomain 1 and subdomain 2. However, subdomain 2 is not functional in Foxp4. Screening for proteins that interact with subdomains 1 and 2 of Foxp2 using yeast two-hybrid analysis revealed that subdomain 2 binds to C-terminal binding protein 1, which can synergistically repress transcription with Foxp1 and Foxp2, but not Foxp4. Subdomain 1 contains a highly conserved leucine zipper similar to that found in N-myc and confers homo- and heterodimerization to the Foxp1/2/4 family members. These interactions are dependent on the conserved leucine zipper motif. Finally, we show that the integrity of this subdomain is essential for DNA binding, making Foxp1, Foxp2, and Foxp4 the first Fox proteins that require dimerization for DNA binding. These data reveal a complex regulatory mechanism underlying Foxp1, Foxp2, and Foxp4 activity, demonstrating that Foxp1, Foxp2, and Foxp4 are the first Fox proteins reported whose activity is regulated by homo- and heterodimerization.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1996

Regulation of nov by WT1: a potential role for nov in nephrogenesis.

The nov gene encodes a putative Insulin-like-Growth Factor-Binding-Protein (IGFBP) of a novel type which is structurally related to a family of growth-factors likely to play a role in the control of cell proliferation. In the kidney, nov is expressed essentially at the embryonic stage and alterations of nov expression, relative to the normal kidney, have been detected in both avian nephroblastomas and human Wilms' tumors. The levels of human nov (novH) and WT1 mRNA in individual Wilms' tumors have been shown to be inversely correlated, suggesting that the expression of novH could be under the negative control of WT1. We have now established the nucleotide sequence of the 5' flanking region and identified two transcription start sites by RNase protection assays and primer extension. We report that in transient cotransfection experiments the transcription activity of novH promoter constructs was repressed by two isoforms of WT1 proteins (WT1 and WT1+KTS). Repression of the novH promoter required both intact zinc finger regions and the NH2 transcription repression domain of WT1. Inasmuch as the minimal region of novH promoter required to mediate WT1 repression in vivo failed to bine recombinant WT1 protein in in vitro footprinting assays this repression may be mediated by either (i) low affinity sites cooperative interactions or (ii) indirectly via protein-protein interactions with another factor(s). Furthermore, constitutive expression of wild type WT1 into 293 cells resulted in a decrease of endogenous NOVH protein levels, suggesting that novH may be a physiological target for WT1. The downregulation of novH expression by WT1 might represent a key element in normal and tumoral nephrogenesis.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2000

Nuclear receptor corepressors partner with class II histone deacetylases in a Sin3-independent repression pathway.

Transcriptional repression mediated by corepressors N-CoR and SMRT is a critical function of nuclear hormone receptors, and is dysregulated in human myeloid leukemias. At the present time, these corepressors are thought to act exclusively through an mSin3/HDAC1 complex. Surprisingly, however, numerous biochemical studies have not detected N-CoR or SMRT in mSin3- and HDAC1-containing complexes. Each corepressor contains multiple repression domains (RDs), the significance of which is unknown. Here we show that these RDs are nonredundant, and that one RD, which is conserved in N-CoR and SMRT, represses transcription by interacting directly with class II HDAC4 and HDAC5. Endogenous N-CoR and SMRT each associate with HDAC4 in a complex that does not contain mSin3A or HDAC1. This is the first example of a single corepressor utilizing distinct domains to engage multiple HDAC complexes. The alternative HDAC complexes may mediate specific repression pathways in normal as well as leukemic cells.

Catalytic Domain↗
PubMed2002

Expression of OASIS, a CREB/ATF family transcription factor, in CNS lesion and its transcriptional activity.

We reported the expression patterns of a novel member of the CREB/ATF family, OASIS, in central nervous system (CNS) lesions and its transcriptional activity. OASIS gene expression was upregulated in the stab-injured spinal cord. Double labeling experiments revealed that the distribution of OASIS mRNA-positive cells overlapped with a population of GFAP-immunoreactive cells. This finding suggested that OASIS might regulate expression of important downstream molecules in certain subset of the reactive astrocytes (e.g. inhibitory substances in injured brain). In gel shift assays, OASIS was able to specifically bind to CRE as CREB family members were. We then examined transcriptional activity of full-length OASIS with GAL4-UAS-luciferase reporter assay in COS7 cells. OASIS protein activated transcription, but did not inhibit basal transcription driven by AdML promoter. To determine critical portion(s) of the OASIS protein in transcriptional activation, we examined the activity of various deletion constructs of OASIS gene. The assay revealed that a strong transcriptional activation domain lay in the N-terminal region where acidic amino acids clustered and a possible repression domain, which had not been reported for other CREB/ATF family members, lay in the more C-terminal region. We therefore proposed that OASIS protein positively regulated gene transcription in a subset of reactive astrocytes, and thereby influenced the reaction of injured CNS tissues.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

The oncogene qin codes for a transcriptional repressor.

The retroviral oncogene qin codes for a protein that belongs to the winged helix family of transcriptional regulators. The Qin protein is localized in the nucleus and binds to the same DNA consensus sequence as rat brain factor 1 (BF-1). Cellular Qin shows greater affinity to DNA than does viral Qin. Alone or fused to the DNA-binding domain of the yeast GAL4 protein, both Qin proteins act as transcriptional repressors. The major transcriptional repression domain maps to the region of amino acids 252-395 of viral Qin.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2002

The methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 links DNA methylation to histone methylation.

DNA methylation plays an important role in mammalian development and correlates with chromatin-associated gene silencing. The recruitment of MeCP2 to methylated CpG dinucleotides represents a major mechanism by which DNA methylation can repress transcription. MeCP2 silences gene expression partly by recruiting histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity, resulting in chromatin remodeling. Here, we show that MeCP2 associates with histone methyltransferase activity in vivo and that this activity is directed against Lys(9) of histone H3. Two characterized repression domains of MeCP2 are involved in tethering the histone methyltransferase to MeCP2. We asked if MeCP2 can deliver Lys(9) H3 methylation to the H19 gene, whose activity it represses. We show that the presence of MeCP2 on nucleosomes within the repressor region of the H19 gene (the differentially methylated domain) coincides with an increase in H3 Lys(9) methylation. Our data provide evidence that MeCP2 reinforces a repressive chromatin state by acting as a bridge between two global epigenetic modifications, DNA methylation and histone methylation.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Neural restrictive silencer factor recruits mSin3 and histone deacetylase complex to repress neuron-specific target genes.

Accumulative evidence suggests that more than 20 neuron-specific genes are regulated by a transcriptional cis-regulatory element known as the neural restrictive silencer (NRS). A trans-acting repressor that binds the NRS, NRSF [also designated RE1-silencing transcription factor (REST)] has been cloned, but the mechanism by which it represses transcription is unknown. Here we show evidence that NRSF represses transcription of its target genes by recruiting mSin3 and histone deacetylase. Transfection experiments using a series of NRSF deletion constructs revealed the presence of two repression domains, RD-1 and RD-2, within the N- and C-terminal regions, respectively. A yeast two-hybrid screen using the RD-1 region as a bait identified a short form of mSin3B. In vitro pull-down assays and in vivo immunoprecipitation-Western analyses revealed a specific interaction between NRSF-RD1 and mSin3 PAH1-PAH2 domains. Furthermore, NRSF and mSin3 formed a complex with histone deacetylase 1, suggesting that NRSF-mediated repression involves histone deacetylation. When the deacetylation of histones was inhibited by tricostatin A in non-neuronal cells, mRNAs encoding several neuronal-specific genes such as SCG10, NMDAR1, and choline acetyltransferase became detectable. These results indicate that NRSF recruits mSin3 and histone deacetylase 1 to silence neural-specific genes and suggest further that repression of histone deacetylation is crucial for transcriptional activation of neural-specific genes during neuronal terminal differentiation.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2002

Regulation of nuclear receptor transcriptional activity by a novel DEAD box RNA helicase (DP97).

We have identified a novel DEAD box RNA helicase (97 kDa, DP97) from a breast cancer cDNA library that interacts in a hormone-dependent manner with nuclear receptors and represses their transcriptional activity. DP97 has RNA-dependent ATPase activity, and mapping studies localize the interacting regions of DP97 and nuclear receptors to the C-terminal region of DP97 and the hormone binding/activation function-2 region of estrogen receptors (ER), as well as several other nuclear receptors. Repression by DP97 maps to a small region (amino acids 589-631) that has homology to a repression domain in the corepressor protein NCoR2/SMRTe. This region of DP97 is necessary and sufficient for its intrinsic repression activity. The N-terminal helicase region of DP97 is, however, dispensable for its transcriptional repressor activity. The knockdown of endogenous cellular DP97 by antisense DP97 or RNA interference (siRNA for DP97) results in significant enhancement of the expression of estradiol-ER-stimulated genes and attenuation of the repression of genes inhibited by the estradiol-ER. This implies that endogenous DP97 normally dampens stimulation and intensifies repression of estradiol-ER-regulated genes. Our findings add to the growing evidence that RNA helicases can associate with nuclear receptors and function as coregulators to modulate receptor transcriptional activity.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2005

Identification of an N-terminal transcriptional activation domain within Brn3b/POU4f2.

The POU-domain transcription factor Brn3b/ POU4f2 is an essential regulator of gene expression in mouse retinal ganglion cells. Although Brn3b's importance in the differentiation of these cells has been firmly established, the regions on Brn3b where transcriptional activation and/or repression domains reside are only vaguely defined, and conflicting publications report both activation and repression activities for Brn3b. To clarify its function, we monitored the transcriptional activity of Brn3b and Gal4 DNA-binding domain (DBD)-Brn3b fusion proteins in cotransfection experiments using either Brn3-consensus or Gal4 DNA-binding sites to drive reporter gene expression. At Gal4 DNA-binding sites, transrepression activity mapping to the POU domain within Brn3b's C-terminal region masked any transactivation activity. More detailed experiments revealed that expressing abnormally high levels of POU homeodomain- or other homeodomain-containing sequences caused fortuitous transrepression in the cotransfection assay. To avoid transrepression, Brn3b sequences lacking Brn3b's POU domain were fused to the Gal4 DBD to allow identification of regions that were responsible for transcriptional activation. Considerable transactivation activity was located between amino acid residues 100 and 239, although other regions also had activity. The transactivation domain synergized strongly with another transcription factor, LexA-VP16. At Brn3 DNA-binding sites, full-length Brn3b increased transcription more than 25-fold, and similar activation was observed with the closely related factor Brn3a/POU4f1. No transactivation activity was associated with the C-terminal POU domain-containing portion of Brn3b. The results demonstrate that Brn3b regulates gene expression through the action of a strong transcriptional activation domain within its N-terminal sequence.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

An essential role of alternative splicing of c-myc suppressor FUSE-binding protein-interacting repressor in carcinogenesis.

Elevated expression of c-myc has been detected in a broad range of human cancers, indicating a key role for this oncogene in tumor development. Recently, an interaction between FUSE-binding protein-interacting repressor (FIR) and TFIIH/p89/XPB helicase was found to repress c-myc transcription and might be important for suppressing tumor formation. In this study, we showed that enforced expression of FIR induced apoptosis. Deletion of the NH(2)-terminal repression domain of FIR rescued the cells from apoptosis as did coexpression of c-Myc with FIR; thus, repression of Myc mediates FIR-driven apoptosis. Surprisingly, a splicing variant of FIR unable to repress c-myc or to drive apoptosis was frequently discovered in human primary colorectal cancers but not in the adjacent normal tissues. Coexpression of this splicing variant with repressor-competent FIR, either in HeLa cells or in the colon cancer cell line SW480, not only abrogated c-Myc suppression but also inhibited apoptosis. These results strongly suggest the expression of this splicing variant promotes tumor development by disabling FIR repression and sustaining high levels of c-Myc and opposing apoptosis in colorectal cancer.

Alternative Splicing↗
PubMed1995

Upstream stimulatory factor proteins are major components of the glucose response complex of the L-type pyruvate kinase gene promoter.

L-type pyruvate kinase (L-PK) gene transcription is induced by glucose through its glucose response element (GlRE) composed of two degenerated E boxes able to bind in vitro ubiquitous upstream stimulator factor (USF) proteins. Here we demonstrate in vivo, by transient transfections in hepatoma cells, that (i) native USF proteins synthesized from expression vectors can act as transactivators of the L-PK promoter via the GlRE, stimulating transcription without glucose and, therefore, decreasing the glucose responsiveness of the promoter; (ii) expression of the truncated USF proteins, able to bind the GlRE but devoid of the NH2-terminal activation domain, represses the activation of the L-PK promoter by glucose; and (iii) a similar repression of the glucose effect is observed upon expression of mutant USF proteins devoid of the basic DNA binding domain, able to dimerize with endogenous USF but not to bind the GlRE. We conclude that USF proteins are components of the transcriptional glucose response complex assembled on the L-PK gene promoter.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1997

Multiple mechanisms of transcriptional repression by YY1.

The four C-terminal GLI-Krüppel type zinc fingers of YY1 have been identified as a transcriptional repression domain. Previous reports have proposed DNA-bending and activator-quenching mechanisms for this zinc finger-mediated repression. In addition, previous work indicated that p300 and CBP might be involved in YY1-mediated repression. We have analyzed these possible models for the zinc finger-mediated repression. The role of each zinc finger in the repression and DNA-binding functions was determined by using a structure-and-function approach. We show that zinc finger 2 of YY1 plays a central role in both DNA binding and transcriptional repression. However, a survey of a panel of YY1 mutants indicates that these two functions can be separated, which argues against the DNA-bending model for repression. We show that the physical interaction between YY1 and p300, a coactivator for CREB, is not sufficient for repression of CREB-mediated transcription. Our studies indicate that YY1 functions as an activator-specific repressor. Repression of CTF-1-directed transcription may be accomplished through direct physical interaction between YY1 and this activator. In contrast, physical interaction is not necessary for YY1 to repress Sp1- and CREB-mediated transcription. Rather, the repression likely reflects an ability of YY1 to interfere with communication between these activators and their targets within the general transcription machinery. Taken together, our results suggest that YY1 employs multiple mechanisms to achieve activator-specific repression.

CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Proteins↗
PubMed2004

Role of an mSin3A-Swi/Snf chromatin remodeling complex in the feedback repression of bile acid biosynthesis by SHP.

The orphan receptor SHP interacts with many nuclear receptors and inhibits their transcriptional activities. SHP is central to feedback repression of cholesterol 7alpha hydroxylase gene (CYP7A1) expression by bile acids, which is critical for maintaining cholesterol homeostasis. Using CYP7A1 as a model system, we studied the molecular mechanisms of SHP repression at the level of native chromatin. Chromatin immunoprecipitation studies showed that mSin3A and a Swi/Snf complex containing Brm as a central ATPase were recruited to the promoter. This recruitment was associated with chromatin remodeling after bile acid treatment that was blunted by inhibition of the endogenous Swi/Snf function by dominant-negative ATPase mutants. Biochemical studies indicated that SHP was associated with the mSin3A-Swi/Snf complex by direct interaction with Brm and mSin3A through its repression domain. Expression of Brm, but not an ATPase mutant, inhibited CYP7A1 promoter activity and further enhanced SHP-mediated repression. Bile acid-induced recruitment of mSin3A/Brm, chromatin remodeling, and concomitant repression of endogenous CYP7A1 expression were impaired when SHP expression was inhibited by SHP small interfering RNA. Our results suggest that SHP mediates recruitment of mSin3A-Swi/Snf to the CYP7A1 promoter, resulting in chromatin remodeling and gene repression, which may also be a mechanism for the repression by SHP of genes activated by many nuclear receptors. Our study establishes the first link between a Swi/Snf complex and regulation of cholesterol metabolism.

Acetyltransferases↗