Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “RESINS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14Linked to original sources
PubMed1990

Effect of composite resin placement and use of an unfilled resin on the microleakage of two dentin bonding agents.

The purpose of this study was to assess, in vitro, the microleakage of Class V restorations using two third generations dentin bonding agents, with a hybrid light polymerized composite resin. One of the bonding agents was of the NPG-PMDM type and the other was a polyhexanide. Restorations were placed in cavities prepared in extracted human premolars using either a bulk or incremental packing technique. The NPG-PMDM-based agent was used with and without an intermediary unfilled resin. The teeth were stored for 1 week at 37 degrees C, thermocycled for 1500 cycles between 55 degrees C, 37 degrees C and 5 degrees C and the restorations examined for leakage using methylene blue dye. The teeth were sectioned through the restorations and the degree of microleakage assessed visually. All groups of restorations showed some degree of leakage at the gingival margin. Statistical analysis showed that there were significant differences in the amounts of leakage (P less than 0.001). There was no difference in leakage between any of the groups that had been restored using the NPG-PMDM system (P greater than 0.05). There was, however, less leakage of the incrementally filled group compared with the bulk-packed group with the polyhexanide agent (P less than 0.05). When the two bonding agents were compared, there was no significant difference in leakage (P greater than 0.05) except for the incrementally-packed polyhexanide and the incrementally-packed NPG-PMDM with unfilled resin (P less than 0.05). Only one specimen in any of the groups leaked at the enamel margin.

Adhesives↗
PubMed1990

[Bond strength of etched enamel to direct composite resins, to indirect composite resins and to etched and silanized porcelain].

The adhesion to enamel of composite resin inlays are not documented as much as porcelain inlays and direct composite resins. This study evaluates the adhesion of a light cured composite resin (P-50) used in an indirect technique and secondarily polymerized by heat. No significant differences were found between adhesion of P-50 used with an indirect technique and adhesion of porcelain (Mirage). P-50 used with the direct technique yield adhesion values significantly lower than the indirect techniques.

Acid Etching, Dental↗
PubMed2004

Longevity of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a polyacid-modified resin composite restoring non-carious cervical lesions in a general dental practice.

BACKGROUND: Long-term prospective survival studies of resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) and polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) placed in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) are lacking from general dental practice. Short-term studies have shown an unsatisfactory clinical performance for several materials. METHODS: One practitioner placed 87 compomer (Compoglass, Vivadent-Ivoclar) and 73 encapsulated RMGIC (Fuji II LC, GC Int.) restorations in NCCLs for 61 adults. Compoglass was placed using SCA primer, and Fuji II LC using GC Dentin Conditioner. No cavity preparation was undertaken. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimating the cumulative survivals for those restorations that were replaced, with the probability level set at alpha = 0.05 for statistical significance. RESULTS: Restorations were judged unsatisfactory (by the practitioner and the subjects) because of surface and marginal loss of material (68.8 per cent), dislodgement (18.8 per cent) and discoloration (12.4 per cent), these modes being similar for both materials (P = 0.35). Unsatisfactory restorations were replaced in 121 (75.6 per cent) instances. After periods of up to five years, cumulative survival estimates were 14.9 (5.8 Standard Error) per cent for Compoglass and zero per cent for Fuji II LC (P = 0.74). Median survivals were 30 months for Compoglass and 42 months for Fuji II LC. CONCLUSION: Both materials had high long-term unsatisfactory performances when placed in non-prepared NCCLs in a general dental practice.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Antibacterial activity of dentin bonding systems, resin-modified glass ionomers, and polyacid-modified composite resins.

The antibacterial effects of the dentin bonding systems Syntac, ProBOND, Gluma 3-Step, the resin-modified glass ionomers Photac-Fil, Fuji Lining LC, Fuji II LC, and the polyacid-modified composite resins VariGlass, Geristore, and Infinity were evaluated using the cariogenic bacteria S mutans, L salivarius, S sobrinus, and A viscosus in vitro with a modified cylinder drop plate agar diffusion assay. All glass ionomers, the polyacid-modified composites, and the primers and adhesives of the dentin bonding systems exhibited various degrees of antibacterial activity against most of the test bacteria. The antibacterial activity of the adhesives of dentin bonding systems was anticipated because of the glutaraldehyde used in their formulations. However, the antibacterial activity of the various primers was unexpected and indicates a dual antibacterial action of these systems.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2000

Effect of a neutral citrate solution on the fluoride release of resin-modified glass ionomer and polyacid-modified composite resin cements.

The effect of 0.01 mol/l citrate solution at pH = 7 on the fluoride release is compared for the resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RM-GIC) GC Lining LC, PhotacBond, Vitremer and Vitrebond and for the polyacid-modified composite resins (PAM-C) Variglass and Dyract by means of the six-month fluoride release profiles at 37 degrees C. The fluoride release of both RM-GIC and PAM-C increases in the neutral citrate solution as compared to water, which can be explained by the ability of citrate to complex metal ions and hence to degrade the glass as well as the polysalt matrix of the cement. Although RM-GIC release more fluoride than PAM-C in water as well as in citrate solution, the relative increase in fluoride release upon immersion in citrate solution is most pronounced for PAM-C. Whereas for the latter citrate affects both the short-term and long-term fluoride release, for RM-GIC only the long-term fluoride release is affected. This suggests that the action of citrate increases with decreasing importance of the polysalt formation in the hardening of the material. This could be explained on the basis of the difference in the chemical properties of the cement matrix.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1999

The influence of finishing time on the marginal seal of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and polyacid-modified resin composite.

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of immediate and delayed finishing on the microleakage of encapsulated resin-modified glass-ionomer, Fuji II LC and a polyacid-modified resin composite, Dyract compomer at both the enamel and dentine margins. Standardized Class V cavities were prepared along the cemento-enamel junction on buccal and palatal surfaces of 24 freshly extracted non-carious premolars. Equal numbers of buccal and palatal cavities in each group were restored with Fuji II LC and Dyract compomer following the manufacturer's instructions. The groups with delayed finishing were restored 1 week earlier, stored in saline at 37 degrees C and finished on the same day as the groups with immediate finishing. The specimens were then thermocycled 500 times and subjected to dye penetration testing. The results showed that both materials leaked more at the dentine than enamel margins for both regimes of finishing methods. There was no statistical difference in the microleakage of Dyract finished immediately or later at enamel and dentine margins and Fuji II LC finished immediately or later in dentine. However, a statistical difference existed between the microleakage in Fuji II LC finished immediately and later in enamel.

Bicuspid↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Antibacterial activity of resin adhesives, glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer in contact with dentin caries samples.

A total of 103 clinical samples of carious dentin were used to study the antibacterial action of different dental resin adhesive materials (Gluma 2000, Syntac, Prisma Universal Bond 3, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose and Prime&Bond 2.0) glass ionomer cements (Ketac-Cem, Ketac-Bond, Ketac-Silver, Ketac-Fil) resin-modified glass ionomer cements (Fuji II LC, Vitremer and Vitrebond) and a compomer (Dyract). The agar plate diffusion method was used for the microbial cultures and a chlorhexidine control. The growth of the caries-producing microorganisms was effectively inhibited by the Vitremer and Vitrebond cements, and to a lesser extent by the Scotchbond Multi-Purpose adhesive system. Overall, there were statistically significant differences in the antibacterial activity of the products tested.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.

This study evaluated the clinical performance and appearance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite over one year. Thirty-seven pairs of restorations of Fuji II LC and Z250/Single Bond were placed in caries-free cervical erosion/abfraction lesions without tooth preparation. Restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 months, using modified Ryge/USPHS criteria. No significant difference (p>0.05) was observed in performance of both materials, although retention of the Z250 restorations was below the minimum specified in the ADA Acceptance Program for Dentin and Enamel Adhesives. Little difference in the restorations' appearance was observed.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Microleakage of Class V composite, resin sandwich, and resin-modified glass ionomers.

PURPOSE: To evaluate in vitro the extent of microleakage of Class V cavities restored with composite, and resin-modified glass ionomers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Class V cavities were prepared in 35 extracted teeth and randomly divided into seven groups of five teeth each (10 restorations in each group). Group 1: Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive (SMP) and restored with Z100 resin placed with an incremental technique, Group 2: Lined with GC Fuji lining LC and restored with SMP and Z100. Group 3: Based with Fuji II light-cured glass ionomer restorative and restored with SMP and Z100. Group 4: Lined with Vitrebond and restored with SMP and Z100. Group 5: Based with Vitremer and restored with SMP and Z100. Group 6: Restored with Fuji II LC. Group 7: Restored with Vitremer. The teeth were subjected to thermocycling, stained with silver nitrate, then longitudinally sectioned. Dye penetration at the tissue/restoration interface was scored based upon the extent and location of the precipitated silver. RESULTS: All groups demonstrated minimal or no microleakage at both the enamel and gingival sites.

Composite Resins↗
PubMed2004

Immobilization and recovery of au nanoparticles from anion exchange resin: resin-bound nanoparticle matrix as a catalyst for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol.

The immobilization of gold nanoparticles in anion exchange resin and their quantitative retrieval by means of a cationic surfactant, cetylpyridinium chloride, is studied. The resin-bound gold nanoparticles (R-Au) have been used successfully as a solid-phase catalyst for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol by sodium borohydride. At the end of the reaction, the solid matrix remains activated and separated from the product. The recycling of catalyst particles after the quantitative reduction of 4-nitrophenol and the recovery of gold nanoparticles with unaffected particle morphology from the resin-bound gold nanoparticle entity have been reported.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2004

One-year clinical evaluation of a flowable resin liner associated with a microhybrid resin in noncarious cervical lesions.

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical performance over 1 year of a microhybrid composite resin for class V restorations both lined and not lined with a flowable composite resin. Nineteen patients having at least two pairs of cervical noncarious lesions under occlusion were enrolled in this study. A total of 38 restorations were placed, half for each group (Single-Bond + Filtek-Flow + Filtek Z250, and Single-Bond + Filtek Z250). Two calibrated operators placed all restorations according to the manufacturers' instructions. Two other independent examiners evaluated the restorations at baseline and after a 12-month period according to the USPHS criteria and modified criteria for color match. The classic alpha score was divided into A1 for "not detectable" and A2 for "slightly discernible" filling. Statistical analysis was conducted using Fisher's exact test and McNemar's test (P=0.05). One restoration was lost after 12 months for each group (retention rate 95% for each group). After 12 months, 18 restorations showed a trend towards dark yellowing (color match A2). The use of Filtek Flow as a liner under Filtek Z250 restorations did not improve the clinical performance of class V restorations after 6 and 12 months of evaluation.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2005

In vivo interfacial adaptation of class II resin composite restorations with and without a flowable resin composite liner.

The aim of this study was to evaluate in vivo the interfacial adaptation of class II resin composite restorations with and without a flowable liner. In 24 premolars scheduled to be extracted after 1 month, 48 box-shaped, enamel-bordered class II cavities were prepared and restored with a flowable liner (FRC, Tetric Flow/Tetric Ceram/Syntac Single-Component) or without (TRC), cured with three different curing modes: soft start and 500- or 700-mW/cm2 continuous irradiation. Interfacial adaptation was evaluated by quantitative scanning electron microscopic analysis using replica method. Gap-free adaptation in the cervical enamel (CE) was observed for FRC and TRC in 96.2 and 90.2%, for the dentin (D) in 63.6 and 64.9%, and for occlusal enamel (OE) in 99.7 and 99.5%, respectively. The difference between the two restorations was not statistically significant (ns). Significant better adaptation was observed for OE than CE and D (p<0.01), and for CE than D (p<0.01). Gap-free adaptation with the soft-start and 500- and 700-mW/cm2 continuous-curing modes was observed for CE: 88.7%, 92.7%, 97.9% (ns); OE: 99.8%, 98.7%, 100% (ns); and D: 64.0%, 63.9%, and 64.6% (ns), respectively. It can be concluded that neither the use of flowable resin composite liner nor the curing mode used influenced the interfacial adaptation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Effect of multi-step dentin bonding systems and resin-modified glass ionomer cement liner on marginal quality of dentin-bonded resin composite Class II restorations.

The use of resin composites in the restoration of Class II cavities with gingival margins located in dentin is still controversial. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of four state-of-the-art multi-step dentin-bonding systems (A. R. T. Bond, Syntac, OptiBond DC, Scotchbond Multipurpose) on marginal adaptation and microleakage of dentin-bonded composite Class II restorations. A total of 72 Class II cavities with gingival margins in dentin were prepared in extracted molars and filled with fine-hybrid composites using a three-sited light curing technique. In one half of the cavities the pulpal wall was lined with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement liner (RM-GIC), in the other half a total bonding technique was applied. A. R. T. Bond and Syntac were tested with selective enamel etching (SE) and total etching (TE). Marginal adaptation was evaluated in a scanning electron microscope before and after thermocycling (TC). Microleakage was determined by dye penetration. After TC the proportions of continuous margin in dentin ranged from 37% (Syntac/SE) to 91.2% (A. R. T. Bond/TE). Scotchbond Multipurpose exhibited the lowest degree of microleakage (0.22 mm). Marginal enamel fracture was the most prevalent marginal defect at the enamel margins (8.3-22.2%). The use of the RM-GIC had no beneficial effect on any of the marginal parameters, either in dentin or in enamel. It is concluded that low degrees of marginal gap formation and microleakage can be achieved in totally bonded composite Class II restorations when using state-of-the-art multi-step bonding systems in combination with a meticulous incremental filling technique.

Composite Resins↗
PubMed1977

A temporary space maintainer using acrylic resin teeth and a composite resin.

A one-session technique for preparing a temporary space maintainer has been described. The technique consists of attaching an acrylic resin pontic to etched surfaces of natural adjacent teeth by means of a composite resin. The main advantages of this technique are elimination of premature tooth preparation, good esthetics, fair strength, low cost, and rapid completion of the restoration without the need of a dental laboratory.

Acid Etching, Dental↗
PubMed1993

The effect of unfilled resin dilution on composite resin hardness and abrasion resistance.

Diluting composite materials with unfilled resin to facilitate clinical application during direct lamination will result in an alteration of filler loading with possible changes of physical properties. This study compared the surface hardness and abrasion resistance of a visible light-cured microfilled and hybrid resin with and without dilution. Samples were prepared, cured, and stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours before testing. Knoop hardness values were obtained from the upper surface of 10 samples in three dilution and control groups of each material. Three samples of the dilution and control groups were similarly prepared and stored for toothbrush abrasion testing. Data from the hardness and abrasion tests were subjected to analysis of variance and Tukey's test at a 0.05 level of significance. Results showed that dilution had a significant effect on surface hardness of the materials tested, although the diluted materials were not significantly different from the controls. Abrasion tests showed visible evidence of abrasion on all samples, but dilution showed no significant effect on abrasion resistance of the materials tested.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1996

Three-year effect of unfilled resin dilution on water sorption of a light-cured microfill and hybrid composite resin.

This in vitro study compared water sorption for various intervals over a 3-year period for visible light-cured microfill and hybrid composite resin with and without unfilled resin dilutions. Statistically significant sorption increases were evident for the 960-day interval for certain dilutions. At 3 years the microfill control revealed a 0.72% relative water sorption increase and its various dilutions 1.92% to 2.36%. By comparison, the hybrid control exhibited an increase of 0.4% and its dilutions were 0.72% to 0.98%.

Absorption↗
PubMed2000

Effect of maturation on the fluoride release of resin-modified glass ionomer and polyacid-modified composite resin cements.

The effect of an early water contact on the fluoride release is studied for the resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RM-GIC) GC Lining LC, PhotacBond, Vitremer and Vitrebond and for the polyacid-modified composite resins (PAM-C) Variglass and Dyract. Six months fluoride release profiles were determined in regularly renewed water (37 degrees C), for the products directly after light curing and after 24 h maturation in a humid atmosphere (85% RH). ANOVA shows that both the short-term and the long-term fluoride release of a RM-GIC are influenced by this maturation. This indicates that direct water contact for this material should be avoided. For the RM-GIC a correlation is found between the initial fluoride release process and the long-term process. For the PAM-C materials, no differences in the fluoride release are found as a function of maturation, indicating that early water contact has no effect. The amounts of fluoride released by PAM-C are low compared to RM-GIC, which can affect their caries preventive potential. The results are explained on the basis of the setting reaction of both types of materials.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1999

A 4-year clinical study on amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in overdenture abutments.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of three different filling materials in overdenture abutment teeth. METHODS: In 49 patients amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement were used to seal the root canal orifices of 155 overdenture abutment teeth. After initial preparation of the cavities, the three restorative materials were randomly assigned to the abutment teeth using a number of balancing criteria. All patients were reviewed every six months and received the same preventive regimen. Survival was assessed at two levels: Sorig (survival of the restoration independent from eventual maintenance treatments) and Scomp (restorations survived even without maintenance treatments). RESULTS: The calculated overall survival percentage of the original restorations (Sorig) after four years was 63 +/- 6% (mean +/- SE). Calculation for the overall complete survival (Scomp) revealed a percentage survival of 57 +/- 6%. At both levels, the differences between the survivals of the investigated materials were not statistically significant (p-values > 0.05). Two abutments were lost, severe caries was the reason for one extraction and another abutment tooth was extracted for periodontal reasons. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study did not point out a superior restorative material for the seal of root canal orifices of overdenture abutments. The distribution of failures over the patients indicates a certain patient dependency.

Composite Resins↗