Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Lithotripsy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Intracorporeal lithotripsy with the holmium:YAG laser.

PURPOSE: Preliminary evaluations of the holmium:YAG laser have demonstrated a variety of potential urological applications, including ablation of soft tissue lesions as well as stone fragmentation. We present our experience with the holmium:YAG laser for intracorporeal lithotripsy of urinary calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 24-month period 75 patients underwent 79 laser procedures, including retrograde ureteroscopy for ureteral calculi (71) and fragmentation of caliceal stones remote from the nephrostomy tract during percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (8). RESULTS: Complete stone fragmentation without need for additional procedures or lithotripsy was achieved in 85% of the cases. Treatment failures included 1 case of stone migration, 7 incomplete fragmentation requiring other lithotripsy devices and 3 laser malfunction. One ureteral perforation occurred when the laser was activated without direct visual guidance. CONCLUSIONS: The holmium:YAG laser has demonstrated its efficacy as a method of intracorporeal lithotripsy. Advantages include ability to fragment stones of all composition, and the multipurpose, multispecialty applications of the holmium wavelength. This laser has potential soft tissue effects, and careful attention to technique during lithotripsy is required to avoid ureteral wall injury.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Outcome of mechanical lithotripsy of bile duct stones in an unselected series of 704 patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This paper evaluates the potential benefit of non mechanical bile duct stone lithotripsy techniques. The efficacy, limitations and risks of mechanical lithotripsy as first choice procedure were studied. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed by Erlangen-type papillotomes, stone extraction by Olympus baskets and mechanical lithotripsy by the Wurbs-system. In an unselected series of 704 patients, everyone with common bile and hepatic duct stones (independent of size, number, location and stone consistency) was included in the study. RESULTS: Complete stone clearance by endoscopic sphincterotomy and basket extraction was possible in 87.6%. Additional mechanical lithotripsy led to a success rate of 98.4% and in combination with ESWL of 98.5%. In 11 patients without possibility of endoscopic stone removal (1.6%), 4 had no access transpapillary (B-II-situs or duodenal diverticulum), 5 anatomical problems (S-shaped common bile duct, intrahepatic stones or impacted stones in cystic duct orifice), and 2 refused further endoscopic interventions. Complication rate was 1.4% (thereof 1.1% successful treatment by endoscopic or surgical means), lethality rate 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS: A very high rate of stone clearance by standard endoscopic procedures is possible. In those patients where mechanical lithotripsy is not successful, other non-surgical lithotriptic procedures either cannot be applied because of anatomical reasons or if performed, the improvement in success rate is marginal.

Cholelithiasis↗
PubMed1998

[Shock-wave lithotripsy in choledocholithiasis in a female patient with a cardiac pacemaker].

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is relatively contraindicated in patients with an implanted cardiac pacemaker. Shock waves can damage the pacemaker by mechanical pressure and also by electromagnetic induction. Since the distance between the applicator and the pacemaker is small during biliary lithotripsy, the risk of damaging the pacemaker is greater. In the following case, the patient presented with a stone in the common bile duct, and had an implanted pacemaker. Lithotripsy with non-synchronized shock waves was the method of choice since conventional surgery was high risk in this specific case. CASE REPORT: In an 84-year-old woman with a stone in the proximal part of the common bile duct, endoscopic attempts of extraction failed. Therefore, shock wave lithotripsy was indicated. This patient had serious heart disease with an interference of spontaneous heart action with the pacemaker at a ratio of 1:1. We decided to treat with shock wave lithotripsy. The application of shock waves was without side effects on the patient and the pacemaker. CONCLUSION: This case is interesting as it highlights the possibility of using the Czech made MEDILIT lithotriptor in the treatment of choledocholitiasis in patients with a pacemaker. Even so, it is necessary to monitor the patient's ECG to ensure the possibility of immediate external stimulation.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Pneumatic lithotripsy applied through deflected working channel of miniureteroscope: results in 143 patients.

Although extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is a successful treatment for ureteral calculi, introduction of miniureteroscopes has advanced endoscopic management. We combined the use of a semirigid ureteroscope with a pneumatic lithotripter (Swiss Lithoclast) for the treatment of ureteral calculi. From January 1992 to August 1994, 143 patients (87 male, 56 female; mean age 48.7 years; age range 22-74 years) with urolithiasis underwent endoscopic lithotripsy with the Swiss Lithoclast under general anesthesia. The 0.8 = mm probe was inserted through the deflected working channel (3.4F) of the Micro-6L ureteroscope (tip diameter 6.9F). The calculi were in the distal (N = 96; 67.1%), mid (N = 34; 23.8%), and proximal part (N = 13; 9.1%) of the ureter. The mean stone size was 6.8 mm (range 5-26 mm). Of the 137 patients whose stones we could access adequately, 70 (51.1%) were stone free immediately after the procedure, and another 31 (22.6%) had residual fragments <3 mm that passed spontaneously. The remaining 36 patients underwent another 50 procedures; 30 SWL sessions in 26 patients (19%), 17 further endoscopic lithotripsies in 14 (10.2%), and open surgery in 3. Application of the Swiss Lithoclast through semirigid miniureteroscopes is highly effective for endoscopic lithotripsy, regardless of stone composition. Deflection of the probe up to 30 degrees did not impair the disintegration rate. Because of the high migration rate of mid and proximal ureteral stones, the Swiss Lithoclast is not recommended in these cases as a primary procedure. Low capital cost and simple and safe handling are the device's major advantages over laser lithotripsy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Laser lithotripsy of difficult bile duct stones under direct visual control.

Biliary laser lithotripsy was performed under direct visual control in 35 consecutive patients not amenable to routine endoscopy. The patients had 1-50 (median 1) bile duct stones with the greatest diameter of the largest stone being 9-42 mm (median 20 mm). Conventional endoscopic treatment had failed because of an inaccessible papilla (16 patients), biliary strictures (seven patients), and impaction or large size of calculi (12 patients). Twelve patients, depending on their anatomical condition, underwent peroral cholangioscopy by means of a mother-babyscope system. Percutaneous cholangioscopy was initially carried out in 23 patients, 7-20 days (median 10 days) after creation of a transhepatic fistula. Pulsed dye laser (32 patients) or alexandrite laser (three patients) lithotripsy was applied under an appropriate direct visual control in all cases. Complete stone disintegration succeeded in 33 of 35 patients. All resultant fragments passed the papilla within a mean number of 1.3 treatment sessions. Peroral cholangioscopic lithotripsy failed in two cases. One patient successfully underwent percutaneous laser treatment and the other patient was referred to surgery. Fever, temporary haemobilia, or a subcapsular liver haematoma were seen in a total of eight patients during establishment of the cutaneobiliary fistula. A 95 year old patient who had been admitted with septic cholangitis died because of cardiorespiratory failure 5 days after bile duct clearance. It is concluded that laser lithotripsy performed under a direct visual control is an effective and safe procedure for the non-surgical treatment of difficult bile duct stones. Ductal clearance can usually be achieved in a single treatment session when the papilla and the stones are accessible by the peroral route. Percutaneous cholangioscopic lithotripsy is more time consuming but highly effective even in patients with a difficult anatomy, bile duct strictures, or intrahepatic calculi. This approach should be limited, however, to cases not amenable to retrograde procedures because the creation of the cutaneobiliary fistula is not without risks.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Clinical experience with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy of ureteral calculi.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We recently acquired a holmium:YAG laser with wavelength of 2.1 microns. We would like to report our success in using this machine for laser lithotripsy. STUDY DESIGN/PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven ureteroscopic laser lithotripsies were performed in 44 patients (three bilateral stones) over a 6 month period. Four stones were in the upper ureter, six in the middle ureter, and 37 in the lower ureter. The holmium laser beam was delivered via a 400 micron flexible quartz fiber through a 7 Fr rigid ureteroscope during the procedure. The stone size varied from 4 to 21 mm. RESULTS: The success rate was 91%. Most of the stones were fragmented to less than 2 mm in size. Larger fragments were removed with a Dormia basket (six cases) for stone clearance. Endoscopic laser ureterotomy was performed in two patients with stricture below the stone. One patient required conversion to open ureterolithotomy, and three required subsequent Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy. A low complication rate was observed. CONCLUSION: The pulsed holmium:YAG laser is safe and effective for use in ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Pulsed dye laser lithotripsy of bile duct stones.

Efficacy and safety of pulsed dye laser lithotripsy was tested in 25 consecutive patients in whom bile duct stones could not be extracted after endoscopic sphincterotomy. The patients had one to six (mean, 1.8) bile duct stones (diameter, 10-35 mm; mean, 18 mm) located in the common bile duct (18 cases), the intrahepatic bile ducts (6 cases), or in a long cystic duct stump (1 case). Different approaches were tested depending on the presence of a T tube and on the localization of the bile duct stones. When a T tube was present (7 cases), the lithotripsy was performed under direct vision using a choledochoscope inserted through the T-tube tract. In 18 patients without a T tube in place, the lithotripsy was performed under fluoroscopy using a retrograde approach in case of common bile duct stones (14 cases) or under choledochoscopy using a percutaneous transhepatic approach in case of intrahepatic bile duct stones (4 cases). Fragmentation of all the bile duct stones and a complete bile duct clearance were obtained in all 11 cases with procedures performed under direct vision as compared with only 5 of 14 cases with procedures under fluoroscopic control. Moreover, 6 of the 9 failures using the latter approach were offered another session using a choledochoscope inserted through a percutaneous transhepatic tract and were also successfully treated. No complication related to the laser beam was noted. It is concluded that pulsed dye laser lithotripsy of bile duct stones (that are unable to be removed by standard endoscopic techniques) is safe and efficacious provided that it is performed under direct vision. Technical refinements are needed before this procedure can be reliably performed under fluoroscopy.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Laser lithotripsy. Patient care, staff education.

The high cost of laser equipment and the required specialization of staff members make extension of laser lithotripsy to every hospital impractical. At present, in Ontario, laser lithotripsy is available only in Toronto and Kingston, and ESWL is available only in Toronto and London. Laser lithotripsy is a viable alternative to invasive surgical treatment of urinary calculi that are resistant to ESWL. For the suitable candidate, laser lithotripsy is a welcome alternative to an extensive surgical procedure and recovery period. Hospitalization is reduced significantly, and patients can return to work after the calculus and residue have been passed. Patients can be managed safely and effectively, resulting in reduced morbidity and mortality and reduced cost in time and expense to the patient and hospital.

Equipment Safety↗
PubMed1991

Endoscopic laser lithotripsy: safe, effective therapy for ureteral calculi.

At our lithotripsy department more than 400 patients with renal or ureteral calculi have been treated with a pulse-dye laser for stone disease. We review our experience during an 11-month period when a total of 223 patients was treated. Of these patients 204 whose ureteral calculi were treated by laser lithotripsy are available for followup. The data in this series demonstrate that a miniaturized ureteroscopic system is of paramount importance in laser lithotripsy, allowing access into the ureter without dilation in the majority of patients (165 of 204). Lack of dilation is associated with a decrease in pain and postoperative hospitalization. Satisfactory stone fragmentation was accomplished in 198 of 204 procedures in this series with use of the laser alone. A low complication rate was observed. Endoscopic laser lithotripsy is a safe, reliable and cost-effective method of therapy for ureteral calculi in a community hospital setting.

Endoscopes↗
PubMed1990

An evaluation of ureteral laser lithotripsy: 225 consecutive patients.

We treated 225 patients with 227 ureteral calculi (5 steinstrasse) via the pulsed dye laser with 9.5F rigid, 7.2F semirigid and flexible, steerable ureteroscopes. The 222 calculi (excluding steinstrasse) were fragmented by laser alone in 141 cases (64%), laser and a basket in 30 (13%), and laser and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in 33 (15%). The laser failed in 18 cases (8%). Of the 222 calculi 165 were impacted. Of 29 impacted upper ureteral calculi 15 were treated by laser disimpaction and fragmentation, 13 by laser disimpaction followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and 1 by an operation. Of 42 mid ureteral calculi (30 impacted) 24 were treated successfully by laser fragmentation and 14 by fragmentation followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, while 4 failed laser therapy. Among 151 lower ureteral and tunnel calculi laser fragmentation was successful in 132 cases (87%), laser followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy was successful in 6 and 13 failed laser treatment. There were no ureteral strictures and no ureteral injuries related to use of the laser. The pulsed dye laser is safe and effective treatment for impacted upper and mid ureteral calculi, small mid ureteral calculi in female patients, and lower ureteral calculi in male and female patients. Use of the laser in conjunction with other endourological methods resulted in the need for an operation in 2 of 225 patients (0.9%) with ureteral calculi.

Endoscopy↗
PubMed1995

Holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser for endoscopic lithotripsy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser for endoscopic lithotripsy on patients diagnosed with urinary tract calculi. METHODS: Thirty-eight procedures utilizing transurethral ureterolithotripsy or percutaneous nephroureteral lithotripsy were evaluated: 5 renal calculi, 31 ureteral calculi (most in the upper ureter), 1 ureteropelvic junction calculus, and 1 bladder calculus. These were mainly in cases that, after being treated with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL), were contraindicated for further ESWL. Laser parameters included energy of 0.5 to 1.0 J/pulse and pulse rate of 5 to 10 Hz. RESULTS: Composition of calculi was determined in 26 procedures. The Ho:YAG laser was effective for fragmenting all types of calculi. Patient outcome evaluated at 6 weeks after treatment showed that 33 of 38 procedures (87%) were effective. Residual calculi in 4 of the 5 unsuccessful procedures were less than 5 mm in size and judged to be able to pass spontaneously. In the remaining procedure, the calculus was passed spontaneously 3 months after treatment. No severe damage to tissues or adverse effects to the body were observed due to the Ho:YAG laser. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these results, we determine that this wavelength is effective for lithotripsy in addition to its previously reported usefulness for soft tissue applications, and, thus, is a cost-effective and highly useful clinical device.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Gallstone lithotripsy: in vitro comparison of fragmentation with a tunable-dye laser and an ultrasonic wire.

Large bile duct stones require fragmentation prior to extraction through the papilla or through a percutaneous tract. This can be attempted with dissolution therapy, crushing baskets, or lithotripsy. Lithotripsy can be accomplished safely and effectively with tunable-dye laser energy delivered through a flexible, 1-F optical fiber under endoscopic or fluoroscopic guidance, but laser technology is very costly. A prototype, flexible ball-tipped wire coupled to an ultrasonic generator via a piezoelectric crystal has been developed for sonolysis of atheroma and thrombus in humans. The purpose of this experiment was to compare human gallstone fragmentation in vitro with a tunable-dye laser and this prototype wire to see if the less expensive ultrasound device might provide an alternative to costly laser technology. Gallstones from 17 patients were subjected to lithotripsy in a water bath with each device until completely fragmented or 60 seconds had elapsed. Neither device effectively fragmented cholesterol stones under these conditions. The ultrasonic wire completely fragmented 57% of bilirubinate stones in 60 seconds. The tunable-dye laser completely fragmented 100% of bilirubinate stones in less than 35 seconds (P = .04). Tunable-dye laser lithotripsy appears superior to the ultrasonic device for percutaneous treatment of bile duct stones.

Cholelithiasis↗
PubMed1990

[Laser lithotripsy with automatic shut-off on tissue contact].

A group of 88 patients with 89 ureteral calculi were treated with the pulsed dye-laser. Visual control was carried out through 8.5-F or 9.5-F ureteroscopes. The laser has automatic shut-off via spectrum analysis of back-scatter laser light. Effective laser pulses can therefore only be induced in the case of contact with the stone. Of the 89 stones 58 (65.2%) were completely fragmented by laser lithotripsy, 15 (16.8%) by laser lithotripsy in combination with ESWL and 9 (10.1%) by other ureteroscopic techniques. Ureterolithotomy was necessary only in 1 case (1%). There were 5 calculi (5.6%) that were too hard for fragmentation. The pulsed dye-laser is a safe and effective treatment modality for ureteral calculi that are not accessible for ESWL or in which ESWL has been unsuccessful. Further experimental and clinical trials will have to show whether miniature probes for electrohydraulic lithotripsy, dye-laser with automatic shut-off, or alexandrite laser will be the method of choice for lithotripsy of ureteral calculi.

Endoscopes↗
PubMed1997

Intracorporeal lithotripsy with the Alexandrite laser.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical use of an Alexandrite laser lithotripter for intracorporeal lithotripsy of urinary calculi. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated a flash lamp pumped, Q-switched Alexandrite solid-state laser for use in conjunction with ureteroscopy (30 cases) or percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (2 cases). The laser operates at a wavelength of 755 nm in a pulsed mode with pulses of 150-800 ns duration at energy settings of 30-80 mJ. RESULTS: The fragmentation rate with the Alexandrite laser alone was 50% (16/32). Failure of the laser was due to equipment malfunction or technical problems in 11 cases and inability to fragment the stone in 5. All cases of failed Alexandrite laser lithotripsy were successfully salvaged with alternative modalities of endoscopic stone destruction and removal. One intraoperative complication, a ureteral perforation, occurred; however, no long-term sequelae related to laser use was documented. CONCLUSION: Clinical results with the Alexandrite laser appear to be inferior to those reported with Alternative laser systems and other forms of intracorporeal lithotripsy. Whereas some of the inadequacies we have noted may be addressed in the future by modifications in the unit and delivery systems, we would not recommend this device for intracorporeal lithotripsy of urinary calculi in its current form.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Mechanical lithotripsy of large common bile duct stones using a basket.

Experience with the Olympus basket mechanical lithotriptor (BML-1Q) in crushing large common bile duct stones before their endoscopic removal is reported. From January 1988 to January 1990, 68 patients with common duct stones too large to be extracted by Dormia baskets or balloon catheters after sphincterotomy were treated with the BML system. The largest stones in each patient ranged from 1.0 to 4.9 cm in diameter. Fifty-seven patients required one session of lithotripsy, ten patients two sessions and one patient three sessions; 26 patients required further endoscopic extraction of stone fragments after successful lithotripsy. The stones were successfully crushed by the BML system and the ducts cleared in 55 patients (81 per cent). In 13 patients mechanical lithotripsy failed because the stones could not be engaged in the lithotriptor basket. In one patient the stone was crushed with the Soehendra lithotriptor, six patients were successfully managed by electrohydraulic lithotripsy through a 'mother and baby' endoscope, indwelling stents were inserted in four patients and two patients underwent surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Fragmentation of bile duct stones by extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: a five-year experience.

Over 5 yr, 103 elderly patients (mean age = 70 yr) with bile duct stones (mainly not amenable to endoscopic extraction) underwent adjuvant extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy using a first-generation kidney lithotripter. Disintegration of stones was achieved after a mean of 1.4 sessions in 92% of the patients. Spontaneous passage of fragments into the duodenum occurred in one fourth of the patients, and endoscopic extraction of fragments was necessary in 75% of the patients, resulting in complete clearance of the bile duct stones in 91 (88%) of 103 patients. The most important adverse effect was septic disease after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in 4% of the patients. The 30-day mortality rate was 1% (one patient), and another 15 patients died during a mean follow-up of 26 +/- 14 mo (mainly of causes unrelated to biliary tract disease). Two of 91 patients who had been rendered stone free were readmitted because of recurrent stone disease during the follow-up period. Of the 43 patients who still had their gallbladders during extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, 14% subsequently underwent cholecystectomy. These data show that extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of bile duct stones is a useful and safe adjunct to nonsurgical procedures for the removal of calculi in the biliary tree.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Treatment of bile duct stones: value of laser lithotripsy delivered via percutaneous endoscopy.

Extraction of stones from the bile ducts via standard endoscopic techniques, a percutaneous transhepatic approach, or a T-tube track can be unsuccessful. We report our preliminary experience with a combination of percutaneous cholangioscopy and dye laser lithotripsy. Flash lamp-excited dye laser (504 nm) lithotripsy delivered by percutaneous cholangioscopy (12 F) was evaluated in 13 patients with stones in the bile ducts. Conventional endoscopic treatment had not been attempted in 4 patients after hepaticojejunostomy and had failed in 3 patients after gastric bypass surgery or gastrectomy, and in 6 patients because of technical difficulties, i.e. due mainly to largeness of stones. In 12 patients a percutaneous transhepatic route was used. In 1 patient the T-tube track was used as access to the bile ducts. Laser lithotripsy resulted in successful fragmentation of stones in 12 patients (92%). The bile ducts cleared spontaneously in 2 patients only. Using additional techniques, i.e. sphincterotomy and stent insertion, the overall combined success rate for duct clearance after laser fragmentation was 100%. Four patients had a retrograde endoscopic sphincterotomy after failed attempts for stone removal at endoscopic retrograde cholangioscopy. Two patients had an antegrade fluoroscopically monitored sphincterotomy. Bleeding complications occurred in 2 patients. This accounted for a high rate (15%) of severe complications. The intrahepatic bleeding in 1 patient was due to an intrahepatic vessel injury by the 13-F sheath. The periampullary bleeding in the other patient occurred after an antegrade papillotomy. Pulsed dye laser lithotripsy proved to be an effective technique in patients with difficult bile duct stones. The main problem of a per cutaneous approach is the complete removal of the fragmented stones, which requires additional procedures in most cases. The percutaneous access is time-consuming and bears a relatively high risk of major bleeding complications. It should therefore be restricted to cases in which conventional endoscopic procedures are impossible or unsuccessful.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Urinary NAG excretion after anesthesia-free extracorporeal lithotripsy of renal stones: a marker of early tubular damage.

Second generation lithotripters require a higher number of shocks per session as well as an increased rate of secondary treatments for complete stone disintegration compared to the original spark gap lithotripter. The clinical relevance of biological side effects caused by such treatment are less known. We evaluated urinary excretion of N-acetyl-glucosaminidase (NAG) before and after lithotripsy in 50 patients treated with a low pressure spark gap lithotripter (Dornier HM3) and in 36 patients treated with a piezoelectric lithotripter (Wolf Piezolith 2200) in an attempt to evaluate their side effects on renal tissue. The urinary excretion of NAG increased after both spark gap lithotripsy using the modified HM3 and piezoelectric lithotripsy. These changes may be associated with slight tubular damage that would occur after anesthesia-free lithotripsy in patients subjected both to a high number of shocks and to secondary treatments.

Acetylglucosaminidase↗