Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “HYPNOTICS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14Linked to original sources

Pharmacologic characterization of the receptor mediating the hypnotic action of dexmedetomidine.

The anesthetic-reducing property of medetomidine far exceeds that seen with other alpha 2-adrenergic agonists (e.g., clonidine). This study examined whether medetomidine possesses hypnotic-anesthetic actions. Dexmedetomidine (the d-enantiomer of medetomidine) induced loss of righting reflex in rats (i.e., hypnosis) at doses greater than 100 micrograms/kg i.p.; sleep-time was dose-dependent up to 1000 micrograms/kg i.p. The l-enantiomer of medetomidine (MPV-1441) did not induce hypnosis even when administered up to 30,000 micrograms/kg i.p. The centrally-active alpha 2-receptor antagonists, atipamezole (MPV-1248) and idazoxan, dose-dependently decreased the hypnotic action of dexmedetomidine. The peripherally-active alpha 2-receptor antagonist, DG-5128, did not reduce dexmedetomidine-induced hypnosis. The stereospecificity of dexmedetomidine's hypnotic action and its dose-dependent attenuation by alpha 2-antagonists confirmed the involvement of alpha 2-receptors in this effect. The finding that only alpha 2-antagonists with central activity attenuate the hypnotic action of dexmedetomidine, suggests that the mediating alpha 2-receptor is located in the central nervous system. In summary, this study suggests that dexmedetomidine induces hypnosis in rats by activating central alpha 2-adrenergic receptors. This study also suggests that alpha 2-antagonists can be used to reverse the hypnotic effects of dexmedetomidine.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

[Prescription of psychopharmaceuticals in general practice. 3. Prescription of hypnotics].

In a multicentre-questionnaire investigation in general practice in the County of Arhus with participation of 66% of the general practitioners in the county, 1,516 prescriptions for hypnotics were registered during one week. 68% of the prescriptions were for women and 32% for men. The average ages of the patients were 65 and 64 years, respectively. The frequency of prescription increased markedly with age. 83% of the prescriptions and 85% of the hypnotics calculated in defined daily doses were benzodiazepines. The majority of the benzodiazepine hypnotics and sedatives prescribed had long half-lives. At the time of the first prescription of hypnotic, 31% of the patients were in a state of mental crisis while only 7% were so after medication for at least six years. In about 30% of the patients, a co-existing somatic disease contributed to a considerable extent to the prescription of the hypnotic while under 1/5 of the patients suffered from genuine mental illness. Approximately 20% of the patients were considered to be potential or genuine addicts. More than 80% of the renewed prescriptions occurred by indirect doctor-patient contact.

Adolescent↗

Sedative-hypnotics: pharmacology and use.

The quest for an ideal sedative-hypnotic drug has been fraught with failure. The goals of the perfect sedative-hypnotic drug are to: (1) produce a transient reduction in the level of consciousness for the purpose of sedation, calmness, and tranquility without lingering aftereffects; (2) produce sleep without the potential to arrest respirations and without aftereffects on sensorium and mood; and (3) produce no abuse, addiction, tolerance, or dependence. Nonetheless, clinical conditions have required the use of sedative-hypnotic drugs in spite of the inherent difficulties with them. The history of sedative-hypnotic drugs is replete with attempts to produce a safe and effective drug. The introduction of one sedative-hypnotic drug for another has been heralded by unguarded optimism and misguided claims. History has repeated itself with each new drug. Toxicities, abuse, addiction, and development of tolerance and dependence have remained in force for each drug that has appeared on the market. Only minor variations on a theme have differentiated one drug from another as the essential features have remained in force.

Drug Interactions↗

Use of hypnotic medicines by elderly people in residential homes.

Data relating to the use of hypnotic medicines from a descriptive epidemiological study of drug use in 55 residential homes for elderly people were analysed. Of the 1888 residents included in the study, 435 (23.0%) were receiving a total of 448 hypnotic medicines. There was preferential prescribing of short-acting benzodiazepines but long-acting benzodiazepines represented 31.7% of all hypnotic drugs prescribed. The median duration of treatment with temazepam was 0.8 years and with nitrazepam 2.5 years. The proportion of residents receiving hypnotic medicines in each home varied from 3.6% to 60.0% with a median of 24.1%. This study indicates a need for general practitioners to review their prescribing of hypnotic medicines for elderly people, paying particular attention to the duration of treatment.

Aged↗

The utilization of hypnotics in chronic schizophrenics: some critical remarks.

Of 23 hospitalized chronic schizophrenic patients, all under neuroleptic medication, hypnotics taken previously for a long time could be totally withdrawn in 16 cases, and in 7 cases, the dosage was diminished by 30%, without any sleep impairment. The gradual reduction of hypnotics was accompanied by a shift of neuroleptic dosage to the evening and bedtime, with reduction of the morning and midday dose, without change of the total daily dose. A significant improvement in the psychic state was observed in 16 patients after withdrawal of the hypnotic; 7 patients showed a slight improvement after reduction of the hypnotic. Monthly or bimonthly reassessment of insomnia in the hospitalized population of chronic schizophrenics is indispensable to avoid the deleterious effects and abuse of hypnotic drugs.

Adult↗

[Sleep complaints and hypnotic use by the elderly--results of a representative survey in West Germany].

For the first time, a country-wide group of West-Germans were interviewed regarding their sleep complaints and hypnotic intake. Therefore 344 persons who were older than 65 years and 1653 subjects between the age of 14 and 65 years were representatively selected by a random route system. Around the age of 45 the prevalence of sleep-disturbances starts rising continuously and dramatically. Over the age of 65 nearly half of the West-Germans (43%) suffer from difficulties in initiating and/or maintaining sleep (DIMS) at least sometimes, 15% suffer frequently or always from these complaints. 79% of the sleep disturbed elderly (over the age of 65) are chronically ill, having sleep-complaints for more than 2 years or since childhood. The hypnotika intake increases with age as well. Around 45 years of age the irregular hypnotika intake (several times the year or month), and after 55 years of age, regular hypnotic intake (daily or several times the week) rapidly rises. After 65 years of age hypnotic intake increases much more than the sleep complaints do. So, every third elderly person (34%) takes hypnotics at least irregularly. The results of this study indicate that sleep complaints in the elderly are three times more common and more severe than in younger persons, and that they tend to chronify while treated with hypnotics.

Adolescent↗

[The classification and mechanism of the hypnotics].

The various hypnotics are currently available. Today benzodiazepine (BZ) derivatives are most used, but non-benzodiazepines (non-BZ), are being used. BZs and non-BZs are classified four groups by means of pharmacokinetics, (1) ultra-rapidly elimination hypnotics, (2) rapidly elimination hypnotics, (3) relatively slow elimination hypnotics and (4) slow elimination hypnotics. BZs modulate gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic transmission, and specific receptors exist in the brain. GABA is the most abundant inhibitory neuro-transmitter in the central nervous system. BZs alter sleep by binding receptor-GABA receptor-chloride channel.

Animals↗

Pharmacodynamic profile of Zaleplon, a new non-benzodiazepine hypnotic agent.

The challenge in developing hypnotic agents for the treatment of insomnia is to balance the sedative effect needed at bedtime with the residual sedation on awakening. Zaleplon is a novel pyrazolopyrimidine hypnotic agent that acts as a selective agonist to the brain omega(1) receptor situated on the alpha(1) subunit of the GABA(A) receptor complex. Zaleplon was proven to be an effective hypnotic drug as it consistently and significantly reduced latency to persistent sleep in insomniac patients for doses of 10 mg and above in polysomnography studies. The pharmacodynamic profile of zaleplon on psychomotor performance, actual driving and cognitive function, including memory, was assessed in several randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in healthy young subjects as well as insomniac patients by using various positive controls (zolpidem, zopiclone, triazolam and flurazepam). The recommended hypnotic dose of zaleplon in young adults (10 mg) produced minimal or no impairment of psychomotor and memory performance even when administered during the night as little as 1 h before waking. No impairment of actual driving was observed when zaleplon 10 mg was administered either at bedtime or in the middle of the night as little as 4 h before waking. Zaleplon 20 mg, twice the recommended dose, generally produced significant impairment of performance and cognitive functions when these functions were measured at the time of peak plasma concentration, i.e. 1 h after dose administration, and no impairment of driving abilities was observed 4 h after a middle-of-the-night administration. In contrast, consistent detrimental residual effects on various aspects of psychomotor and cognitive functions were observed with the therapeutic doses of the various commonly prescribed hypnotic agents used as comparators, e.g. zolpidem 10 mg up to 5 h after dose administration, zopiclone 7.5 mg up to 10 h after, flurazepam 30 mg up to 14 h after and triazolam 0.25 mg up to 6 h after. Also, zolpidem 10 mg and zopiclone 7.5 mg were also shown to significantly impair driving ability the next morning when this was measured 4 h and up to 10 h after dose administration, respectively. The present review shows that zaleplon 10 mg has little or no residual effect when administered in the middle of the night, as late as 1 h before waking, and is devoid of impairment of driving abilities as assessed by actual driving 4 h after dose administration. The lack of clinically significant or minimally statistically significant residual effects of zaleplon even at its peak concentration may be explained by its unique pharmacokinetic (rapid elimination half-life) and pharmacodynamic (low affinity, and specific binding profile to various subunits of the GABA(A)receptor) profiles. These properties allow zaleplon to be used for treatment of symptoms only when they occur, either at bedtime or later in the night, without incurring significant risk of developing next-day impairment of psychomotor and cognitive functioning. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Journal Article↗

Role of serotonergic neurotransmission in the hypnotic response to dexmedetomidine, an alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist.

The role of serotonergic pathways in the hypnotic response to dexmedetomidine was examined in neurochemical and behavioral studies. Following acute administration of dexmedetomidine, loss of righting reflex and changes in serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) and norepinephrine turnover in different brain regions (locus coeruleus and hippocampus) were assessed. In separate experiments, the effect of dexmedetomidine on 5-HT turnover was measured in rats rendered tolerant to the hypnotic effects of dexmedetomidine. These neurochemical data were complemented by a study of dexmedetomidine-induced hypnotic response in the presence of a 5-HT2 receptor agonist and antagonist, 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOI) and ritanserin, respectively. Dexmedetomidine (1-500 micrograms.kg-1) dose dependently reduced 5-HT and norepinephrine turnover in both the locus coeruleus and hippocampus. The decrease in 5-HT turnover more closely correlated with the dose-response curve for loss of righting reflex, a behavioral measure of hypnosis, than did the norepinephrine turnover. In previous studies with chronic administration of dexmedetomidine (3 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 for 7 days), the norepinephrine turnover effect of acute dexmedetomidine (30 micrograms.kg-1) persisted while the hypnotic effect was blunted. Following the same regimen, the drug's ability to diminish 5-HT turnover was also blunted. This biochemical evidence for the role of 5-HT in sleep was supported by the behavioral evidence that dexmedetomidine (100 micrograms.kg-1 i.p. or 7 micrograms.0.2 microliter-1 locus coeruleus)-induced hypnosis was dose dependently blocked by DOI (0.08-0.32 mg.kg-1 i.p.). The selectivity of this effect was demonstrated by the finding that ritanserin (0.16 mg.kg-1 i.p.) pretreatment blocked the effects of DOI (0.16 mg.kg-1 i.p.) on dexmedetomidine (100 micrograms.kg-1 i.p. or 7 micrograms.0.2 microliter-1 locus coeruleus)-induced loss of righting reflex. In conclusion, these findings suggest that the hypnotic effect of the alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist, dexmedetomidine, is not mediated solely by changes in noradrenergic neurtransmission, but instead is strongly associated with a decrease in serotonergic neurotransmission and correspondingly diminished by stimulation of 5-HT2 receptors.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

Effects of hypnosis on regional cerebral blood flow during ischemic pain with and without suggested hypnotic analgesia.

Using 133Xe regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) imaging, two male groups having high and low hypnotic susceptibility were compared in waking and after hypnotic induction, while at rest and while experiencing ischemic pain to both arms under two conditions: attend to pain and suggested analgesia. Differences between low and highly-hypnotizable persons were observed during all hypnosis conditions: only highly-hypnotizable persons showed a significant increase in overall CBF, suggesting that hypnosis requires cognitive effort. As anticipated, ischemic pain produced CBF increases in the somatosensory region. Of major theoretical interest is a highly-significant bilateral CBF activation of the orbito-frontal cortex in the highly-hypnotizable group only during hypnotic analgesia. During hypnotic analgesia, highly-hypnotizable persons showed CBF increase over the somatosensory cortex, while low-hypnotizable persons showed decreases. Research is supportive of a neuropsychophysiological model of hypnosis (Crawford, 1991; Crawford and Gruzelier, 1992) and suggests that hypnotic analgesia involves the supervisory, attentional control system of the far-frontal cortex in a topographically specific inhibitory feedback circuit that cooperates in the regulation of thalamocortical activities.

Adult↗

Relaxation strategies and enhancement of hypnotic susceptibility: EEG neurofeedback, progressive muscle relaxation and self-hypnosis.

Hypnosis has been shown to be efficacious in a range of clinical conditions, including the management of chronic pain. However, not all individuals are able to enter a hypnotic state, thereby limiting the clinical utility of this technique. We sought to determine whether hypnotic susceptibility could be increased using three methods thought to facilitate relaxation, with particular interest in an EEG neurofeedback protocol which elevated the theta to alpha ratio. This was compared with progressive muscle relaxation and self-hypnosis. Ten subjects with moderate levels of susceptibility (2-7/12) were randomly assigned to each condition and assessed for hypnotic susceptibility prior to and upon completion of 10 sessions of training. Hypnotic susceptibility increased post-training in all groups, providing further evidence that operant control over the theta/alpha ratio is possible, but contrary to our predictions, elevation of the theta/alpha ratio proved no more successful than the other interventions. Nonetheless, all three techniques successfully enhanced hypnotic susceptibility in over half of the participants (17/30), a similar incidence to that reported using other methods. As previously reported, the majority who were not susceptible to modification were at the lower levels of susceptibility, and the greater increases tended to occur in the more susceptible subjects. However, here enhancement was disclosed in some at low levels, and capability was found of reaching high levels, both features not typically reported. Further research is warranted.

Adult↗

Somatosensory event-related potential changes to painful stimuli during hypnotic analgesia: anterior cingulate cortex and anterior temporal cortex intracranial recordings.

The present study examined neurophysiological correlates of pain and pain control by recording intracranial somatosensory event-related potentials (SERPs) to painful cutaneous stimuli in two female patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder bearing multiple intracranial electrodes during conditions of (a) attention and (b) hypnotically suggested analgesia. Intracranial electrodes were located in the anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, temporal cortex, and parietal cortex. No changes were observed in the SERPs of the hypnotically unresponsive patient. In the hypnotically responsive patient, reduced pain perception during suggested hypnotic analgesia was accompanied by (a) a significant reduction of the positive SERP component within the range of 140-160 ms post-stimulus in the left anterior cingulate cortex (Shaltenbrandt atlas: 29.12/ -7.42/32.41), and (b) a significant enhancement of the negative SERP component within the range of 200-260 ms in the left anterior temporal cortex (Brodmann area 21). No significant changes were observed in the amygdala or the scalp-recorded Fz. The present study is the first to demonstrate the involvement of the anterior cingulate cortex and the anterior temporal cortex in the control of pain with hypnotically suggested analgesia.

Adult↗

Local and remote effects of hypnotic suggestions of analgesia.

The present study was designed to further characterize hypnotic analgesia and particularly to examine whether the effects are due to a selective alteration of pain perception and are organized somatotopically. Thirty-two healthy volunteers participated in this study. Thermal detection thresholds for warmth and cool stimuli and heat pain thresholds were measured at both the upper and lower left limbs by means of a thermotest. Measurements were performed before, during and after a hypnotic session during which the subjects were administered a French adaptation of the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale and then standardized suggestions of analgesia limited to the left foot. Heat pain thresholds were significantly increased at both the lower and upper limbs. Changes at the foot were positively correlated with the hypnotic susceptibility score, while, unexpectedly, changes at the hand were negatively correlated with the susceptibility score. Mean detection thresholds for warmth and cool stimuli were also altered at both the lower and upper limbs during hypnosis, but these modifications were correlated neither with susceptibility nor with the changes in heat pain threshold. These results indicate that hypnotic suggestions can selectively and somatotopically alter pain sensation in highly susceptible subjects. It is also suggested, however, that suggestions of analgesia can induce selective alterations of pain perception in poorly susceptible subjects, although these effects did not appear to be localized 'appropriately'.

Adult↗

Dissociation of sensory and affective dimensions of pain using hypnotic modulation.

Understanding the complex nature of pain perception requires the ability to separately analyze its psychological dimensions and their interaction, and relate them to specific variables and responses. The present study, therefore, attempted to selectively modulate the sensory and affective dimensions of pain, using a cognitive intervention, and to assess the possible relationship between these psychological dimensions of pain and changes in physiological responses to the noxious stimuli. In three experiments, normal subjects trained in hypnosis rated pain intensity and pain unpleasantness produced by a tonic heat-pain stimulus (1-min immersion of the hand in 45.0-47.5 degrees C water). Two experiments were designed to test hypnotic suggestions to decrease (Experiment one (Section 2.5.1)), or increase and decrease (Experiment two (Section 2.5.2)) pain affect. Suggestions in Experiment three (Section 2.5.3) were directed towards an increase or decrease in pain sensation. In Experiments one and two (Sections 2.5.1 and 2.5.2), the significant modulation in pain unpleasantness ratings was largely independent of variations in perceived pain intensity. Moreover, in Experiment two (Section 2.5.2), there was a significant correlation between the stimulus-evoked heart-rate increase and ratings of pain unpleasantness, but not of pain intensity, suggesting a direct functional interaction between pain affect and autonomic activation. In Experiment three (Section 2.5.3), suggestions to modulate the sensory aspect of pain produced significant modulation of pain intensity ratings, with secondary changes in pain unpleasantness ratings. Hypnotic susceptibility (Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale form A) was specifically correlated to pain unpleasantness modulation in Experiment two (Section 2.5.2) and to pain intensity modulation in Experiment three (Section 2.5.3), suggesting that this factor relates to the primary process toward which hypnotic suggestions are directed. The specific pain dimension on which hypnotic suggestions act depends on the content of the instructions and is not a characteristic of hypnosis itself. Results are consistent with a successive-stage model of pain perception (e.g. Wade JB, Dougherty LM, Archer CR, Price DD. Assessing the stages of pain processing: a multivariate analytical approach. Pain 1996;68:157-167) which provides a conceptual framework necessary to study the cerebral representation of pain perception.

Affective Symptoms↗

Frequency of occurrence of the F wave in distal flexor muscles as a function of hypnotic susceptibility and hypnosis.

The aim of the experiment was to assess whether the membrane excitability of flexor cervical and/or lumbar motoneurons is related to hypnotic susceptibility (measured with the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form A) and hypnosis. During the experimental sessions, hypnotized subjects were given only suggestions of relaxation (neutral hypnosis) while awake subjects were given instructions to be quiet and relaxed (simple relaxation). F waves were recorded from the abductor digiti minimi and abductor hallucis of both sides after electrical stimulation of the ulnar or tibial nerve, respectively, and were used as an index of motoneuron membrane excitability in three groups of subjects: highly susceptible under neutral hypnosis, highly susceptible and non-susceptible during simple relaxation sessions. In lower limbs, there was no difference among the groups in the frequency of occurrence of F waves. In upper limbs, hypnosis selectively reduced F frequency of occurrence in flexor motoneurons on the right side. This reduction persisted after the end of hypnosis and also occurred during the last period of relaxation in highly susceptible non-hypnotized subjects. Results support the idea that hypnotic phenomena develop along a continuum in which some trait differences can be more easily revealed by the induction of hypnosis.

Adult↗

Skin reactions to histamine of healthy subjects after hypnotically induced emotions of sadness, anger, and happiness.

BACKGROUND: The severity of symptoms in asthma and other hypersensitivity-related disorders has been associated with changes in mood but little is known about the mechanisms possibly mediating such a relationship. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of mood on skin reactivity to histamine by comparing the effects of hypnotically induced emotions on flare and wheal reactions to cutaneous histamine prick tests. METHODS: Fifteen highly hypnotically susceptible volunteers had their cutaneous reactivity to histamine measured before hypnosis at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, and 15 min after the histamine prick. These measurements were repeated under three hypnotically induced emotions of sadness, anger, and happiness presented in a counterbalanced order. Skin reactions were measured as change in histamine flare and wheal area in mm2 per minute. RESULTS: The increase in flare reaction in the time interval from 1 to 3 min during happiness and anger was significantly smaller than flare reactions during sadness (P<0.05). No effect of emotion was found for wheal reactions. Hypnotic susceptibility scores were associated with increased flare reactions at baseline (r=0.56; P<0.05) and during the condition of happiness (r=0.56; P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results agree with previous studies showing mood to be a predictor of cutaneous immediate-type hypersensitivity and histamine skin reactions. The results are also in concordance with earlier findings of an association between hypnotic susceptibility and increased reactivity to an allergen.

Adult↗

Hypnotic underestimation of time: the busy beaver hypothesis.

Two experiments tested the hypothesis that the hypnotic underestimation of time is mediated by attentional processing. In Experiment 1, variations in the demands placed on attentional resources produced substantial differences in the subjective estimates of identical length intervals occurring within a hypnotic context. In Experiment 2, attentional manipulation was assessed in both hypnotic and waking contexts. Time judgments were again found to vary with attentional demands but not with hypnotic context. The results are consistent with a busy beaver hypothesis, which holds that hypnotic, as well as nonhypnotic, time estimates are a by-product of the attentional processing demands of the task.

Attention↗

EEG concomitants of hypnosis and hypnotic susceptibility.

Electroencephalograph (EEG) measures described high- and low-hypnotizable participants in terms of 3 conditions: an initial baseline period; baselines preceding and following a standard hypnotic induction; and during the induction. The following results were obtained. 1. High and low-hypnotic susceptible participants displayed a differential pattern of EEG activity during the baseline period, characterized by greater theta power in the more frontal areas of the cortex for the high-susceptible participants. 2. In the period preceding and following a standardized hypnotic induction, low-susceptible participant displayed an increase in theta activity, whereas high-susceptible participants displayed a decrease. 3. During the actual hypnotic induction itself, theta power significantly increased for both groups in the more posterior areas of the cortex, whereas alpha activity increased across all sites. Implications of these data include the possibility of psychophysiological measures offering a stable marker for hypnotizability, and anterior/posterior cortical differences being more important than hemispheric foci for understanding hypnotic processes.

Alpha Rhythm↗