Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Genotypes”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14Linked to original sources

Genotypic Responses to Salinity: Differences between Salt-sensitive and Salt-tolerant Genotypes of the Tomato.

Four ecotypes of the species Lycopersicon cheesmanii ssp. minor (Hook.) C.H. Mull. from the Galapagos Islands were compared with L. esculentum Mill cv. VF 36 with respect to salt tolerance. The L. cheesmanii ecotype that proved most salt-tolerant was selected for detailed comparison with the L. esculentum cultivar. Plants were grown in modified Hoagland solution salinized with synthetic seawater salt mix. Growth rates under saline conditions were examined and amino acid, sugar, total amino nitrogen, free acidity, and Na and K levels in the tissues of the most and least tolerant plants were measured under salt stress and nonstress conditions. Results indicate that all Galapagos ecotypes were far more salt-tolerant than was the esculentum cultivar. They could survive in full strength seawater nutrient solution while the esculentum cultivar could not in most cases withstand levels higher than 50% seawater. Growth rates were reduced in both species under saline conditions but the esculentum cultivar was more severely affected. High levels of total amino nitrogen, specific amino acids, and free acidity along with low sodium content were found in the salt stressed VF 36 cultivar. The opposite responses were noted in the salt stressed treatments of the Galapagos ecotype. Tissue sugar levels did not appear to be similarly correlated with salt stress in either species. Potassium content fell sharply during salinization in the Galapagos ecotype while in the esculentum cultivar it declined relatively little even at high levels of salinity.

Journal Article↗

Functional and clinical significance of hepatitis D virus genotype II infection.

Hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection is one of the important etiologies of fulminant hepatitis and may aggravate the clinical course of chronic HBV infection to cirrhosis and liver failure. HDV was classified into three genotypes. Recent molecular phylogenetic analysis of HDV suggests at least seven major clades. The genotype I HDV is widely spread, genotype II is found in East Asia and genotype III HDV is prevalent in South America. The genomic size is 1682-1685 nucleotides (nt) for genotype II, and 1676 nt for genotype IV (IIb). The divergence in HDV nucleic acid sequences between genotype II and other genotypes varies from 13.8% to 35.3%. The divergences in the HDAg-coding region may range from 17.8% to 29.8% between genotype II and other genotypes. There is no genotypic or size restriction on the interactions of either the small or the large hepatitis delta antigens (HDAgs) between genotypes I and II, and there is also no genotypic incompatibility during co-package of HDAgs of different genotypes into virus like particles. There appears no apparent universal genotypic restriction of the transactivation of genotype I HDV RNA replication by small HDAg of genotype II. In contrast, there appears more genotypic restriction for genotype I small HDAgs to transactivate genotype II HDV RNA replication. Of the functional domains of HDAg, the 19 amino acids at the carboxyl-end of the large HDAg show the greatest divergences (70%-80%) between genotypes I and II. The viral packaging efficiencies of genotype I HDV isolates are usually higher than those of genotype II. The 19 amino acids at the carboxyl-end seem to be the most important determinant for viral packaging efficiencies. The editing efficiencies of the genotype I HDV are also higher than those of the genotype II. Genotype II HDV infection is relatively less frequently associated with fulminant hepatitis at the acute stage and less unfavorable outcomes [cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)] at the chronic stage as compared to genotype I. It appears that the clinical manifestations and outcomes of patients with genotype IV (IIb) HDV infection are more like those of patients with genotype II HDV infection. Persistent replication of HBV or HDV was associated with higher adverse outcomes (cirrhosis, HCC or mortality) compared to those who cleared both viruses from the sera. HBV of the genotype C is also a significant factor associated with adverse outcomes (cirrhosis, HCC or mortality) in patients with chronic hepatitis D in addition to genotype I HDV and age. However, most patients with chronic HDV infection have low or undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA levels. During longitudinal follow-up, genotype I HDV is the most important determinant associated with survival.

Genotype↗

Hepatitis C virus genotype 3 predominates in North and Central India and is associated with significant histopathologic liver disease.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes help to tailor the treatment response, but their influence on the disease severity and association with hepatic steatosis is not well understood. The prevalence of HCV genotypes and their correlation with the histopathological severity of liver disease and steatosis in Indian patients were studied. HCV-RNA and genotyping was carried out in 398 patients with chronic hepatitis C. Liver biopsy was available in 292 (73.4%) patients. The severity of liver disease was graded on the basis of the histological activity index and the stage of hepatic fibrosis. The patients were categorized as having mild (histological activity index < or =5 and/or fibrosis < or =2) or severe (histological activity index > or =6 and/or fibrosis > or =3) liver disease. Steatosis was graded in 106 patients as 0 (no steatosis), 1 (<33% of hepatocytes affected), 2 (33%-66% of hepatocytes affected), or 3 (>66% of hepatocytes affected). HCV genotype 3 was detected in 80.2% patients (3a:24.4%, 3b:3.3%, 3c:0.5%, 3a/3b:36.7%, and un-subtypable 3:15.3%), genotype 1 in 13.1% (1a:3%, 1b:5.5%, 1a/1b:0.3%, and un-subtypable 1:4.3%), genotype 4 in 3% patients (4a:1.5%, 4b:0.3%, 4a/4c:0.5%, and un-subtypable 4:0.8%), 2 in 2.5% and mixed genotypes (more than one genotype) in 1.3% of patients. The median histological activity index and fibrosis scores were: 5 and 2 in genotype 1; 4 and 2 in genotype 2; 5 and 2 in genotype 3; 7 and 3 in genotype 4; and 5 and 2 in mixed genotypes, respectively. Severe liver disease was present in 17 of 38 (45%) with genotype 1; in 1 of 3 (33%) with genotype 2; in 128 of 236 (54%) with genotype 3; 7 of 10 (70%) with genotype 4; and in 1 of 4 (25%) with mixed genotype. Hepatic steatosis grade > or =2 was found in 28.1% of genotype 3; 23.5% of genotype 1; 20% of genotype 4; and in none of genotype 2 and mixed genotypes. In conclusion, genotype 3 is the most prevalent genotype in patients with chronic hepatitis C in North and Central India and this is associated with significant hepatic steatosis and fibrosis.

Adolescent↗

Characterization of anti-hepatitis C virus-positive sera not genotyped by restriction fragment length polymorphism or serology.

BACKGROUND: The hepatitis C virus genome is extremely heterogeneous and has been classified into six major genotypes. Genotyping of hepatitis C has been achieved through both direct molecular approach and indirect detection of host genotype-specific antibodies by serological methods. The purpose of this study was to characterize anti-hepatitis C positive sera samples that were not genotyped either by restriction fragment length polymorphism or by serology. METHODS: Two hundred and two patients from northern California with established chronic hepatitis C virus infection were studied by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the 5'-untranslated region amplicon. A serological genotyping assay, based on synthetic peptides derived from non-structural region 4 of the hepatitis C virus genome, was used to determine serological genotype. RESULTS: Of the 202 patients studied, 187 (93%) were polymerase chain reaction-positive. One hundred and eighty-six patients were able to be genotyped by restriction fragment length polymorphism, compared with 144/202 (71%) of patients genotyped by serology (P < 0.0001). Only two of 202 samples showed discordant genotyping results. The distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in northern California was found to be type 1a, 41%; 1b, 35%; 2a, 3%; 2b, 10%; 3a, 11%; and 4, < 1%. There was no association between hepatitis C genotypes and age, gender distribution, ethnic origin, presumptive mode of transmission, serum alanine aminotransferase levels and the proportion of patients with cirrhosis. Of the 15 patients who were not genotypable by the molecular assay, four patients were genotyped by serology, with hepatitis C virus genotypes 1, 2 and 3 represented. Of the 58 samples that were not genotyped by serology, 47 were genotyped based on the molecular assay, and the distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes was similar to that of the overall study population. CONCLUSIONS: These data showed that: (i) molecular genotyping assay based on 5'-untranslated region is more sensitive than serologic genotyping based on the non-structural-4 region but the results were highly concordant; (ii) hepatitis C virus genotypes 1-4 are present in northern California, with genotype 1 being the most prevalent; and (iii) the failure to determine hepatitis C virus genotype based on molecular or serological genotyping assay does not appear to be related to specific hepatitis C genotypes.

California↗

Enhanced responses of blood pressure, renal function, and aldosterone to angiotensin I in the DD genotype are blunted by low sodium intake.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity is increased in the DD genotype, but the functional significance for renal function is unknown. Blunted responses of BP and proteinuria to ACE inhibition among DD renal patients during periods of high sodium intake were reported. It was therefore hypothesized that sodium status affects the phenotype in the ACE I/D polymorphism. The effects of angiotensin I (AngI) and AngII among 27 healthy subjects, with both low (50 mmol sodium/d) and liberal (200 mmol sodium/d) sodium intakes, were studied. Baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) values, renal hemodynamic parameters, and renin-angiotensin system parameters were similar for all genotypes with either sodium intake level. With liberal sodium intake, the increases in MAP, renal vascular resistance, and aldosterone levels during AngI infusion (8 ng/kg per min) were significantly higher for the DD genotype, compared with the ID and II genotypes (all parameters presented as percent changes +/- 95% confidence intervals), with mean MAP increases of 22 +/- 2% (DD genotype), 13 +/- 5% (ID genotype), and 12 +/- 6% (II genotype) (P < 0.05), mean increases in renal vascular resistance of 100.1 +/- 19.7% (DD genotype), 73.0 +/- 16.3% (ID genotype), and 63.2 +/- 16.9% (II genotype) (P < 0.05), and increases in aldosterone levels of 650 +/- 189% (DD genotype), 343 +/- 71% (ID genotype), and 254 +/- 99% (II genotype) (P < 0.05). Also, the decrease in GFR was more pronounced for the DD genotype, with mean decreases of 17.9 +/- 4.7% (DD genotype), 8.8 +/- 3.4% (ID genotype), and 6.4 +/- 5.9% (II genotype) (P < 0.05). The effective renal plasma flow, plasma AngII concentration, and plasma renin activity values were similar for the genotypes. In contrast, with low sodium intake, the responses to AngI were similar for all genotypes. The responses to AngII were also similar for all genotypes, with either sodium intake level. In conclusion, the responses of MAP, renal hemodynamic parameters, and aldosterone concentrations to AngI are enhanced for the DD genotype with liberal but not low sodium intake. These results support the presence of gene-environment interactions between ACE genotypes and dietary sodium intake.

Adult↗

[Distribution of hepatitis B virus genotypes and its clinical significance in Guangxi].

OBJECTIVE: To understand the distribution of hepatitis B virus genotype in Guangxi and its clinical significance. METHODS: Nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR) was used for amplification of HBV DNA in sera of asymptomatic carrier (ASC) of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and patients with different liver diseases from southern and northern Guangxi. Specimens from 161 subjects were positive for HBV DNA and HBV genotype was determined by using restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, direct sequencing or cloning sequencing. RESULTS: The prevalence of genotype A was 3.7% in all samples and that of genotype B, C and D was 21.7%, 72.7% and 1.2%, respectively. No other genotypes (such as genotype E, F, G, H) were found. The prevalence of genotype C showed an increasing trend in ASC, chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) group; in contrast, the prevalence of genotype B showed an opposite trend, although no statistically significant difference was observed, except between ASC and HCC (P=0.05). The HBeAg positive rate was higher, and the anti-HBe positive rate was lower in patients with chronic genotype C infection than in those with genotype B (P<0.05 for both). Liver function test (ALT) abnormality was more severe in genotype C group than in genotypes A and B groups having acute or chronic infection (P<0.01 for all comparisons). The prevalence of genotype C in southern Guangxi was higher than that in northern Guangxi. In contrast, the prevalence of genotype B in southern Guangxi was lower than that in northern Guangxi. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The predominant HBV genotypes in Guangxi were genotypes B and C. The major genotype in southern Guangxi was genotype C; while that in northern Guangxi was genotype B, which implied that the distribution of HBV genotype C was consistent with the incidence of HCC in Guangxi. 2. Genotype C maybe associated with development of severe liver diseases including HCC. 3. Genotype A,D and B+C were mostly found in acute, hepatitis and chronic hepatitis group.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular↗

HBV genotype characterization and distribution in patients with HBV-related liver diseases in Zhejiang Province, P.R. China: possible association of co-infection with disease prevalence and severity.

BACKGROUND: There are 8 well-documented genotypes of hepatitis B virus (HBV) at this time point. Genotyping can be accomplished based on a partial sequence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genome such as the pre-S or S gene. Several methods have been developed and used for HBV genotyping including direct sequencing, restriction fragment length polymorphism, line probe assay and enzyme-linked immunoassay. Recently, a novel, rapid and cost-effective genotyping method based on PCR amplification assay using type-specific primers that can identify all six major genotypes has been developed. This study was undertaken to characterise HBV genotypes and investigate the association between the prevalence of different genotypes and the severity of HBV-induced liver diseases. METHODS: Serum samples from carriers of HBV and patients with HBV-related liver diseases from Zhejiang Province were screened for viral serological markers using commercially available radioimmunoassay (RIA) and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. Serum HBV DNA load was determined by real-time detection PCR. A type-specific primer based the nested-PCR method was employed in the HBV genotyping. The genotype results obtained were confirmed by direct sequencing of nested PCR amplicons of the pre-S region. Ten samples of each genotype (B and C) were sequenced. RESULTS: The survey on a cohort of 125 HBV carriers in and around Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province showed the existence of HBV genotypes A (0.8%), B (48%), C (40.8%), D (0.8%), mixed B and C (9.6%) and an absence of E and F genotypes. Distribution of HBV genotypes in patients with liver diseases revealed a statistically insignificant higher prevalence of genotype B in mild chronic hepatitis (CH). Among the three genotypes B, C and mixed B/C infections 11 (73.3%), 3 (20%) and 1 (6.7%), (P<0.05), respectively in subjects with moderate CH, genotype B was significantly predominant. The infection patterns for genotypes B, C and B/C mixed in (i) liver cirrhosis (LC) 4 (23.5%), 10 (58.8%) and 3 (17.7%) and (ii) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) 2 (28.6%), 5 (71.4%) and 0 (0.0%) respectively revealed a marked association of C genotype with liver disease; however, the association was statistically insignificant (P>0.05). Differences in positive rate of HBeAg for the three genotypes B, 16 (30.8%), C, 27 (51.9%), and mixed B/C, 9 (17.3%) were significant (P<0.05), with genotype C showing predominance. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show an interesting distribution of HBV A-D genotypes in Zhejiang Province. Furthermore, our results indicate a novel and markedly high prevalence of mixed B/C genotype infections in subjects with severe CH and LC, and a possible association of mixed B/C infections with the severity of liver diseases in this region of Mainland China.

Adult↗

Common genotypes of hepatitis B virus.

OBJECTIVE: To find out the frequency of common genotypes of hepatitis-B virus (HBV). DESIGN: An analytical study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: The present study was carried out at Division of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Diagnostics, Centre for Applied Molecular Biology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan from May 2002 to February 2004. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: HBV genotypes were determined in 112 HBV DNA positive sera by a simple and precise molecular genotyping system based on PCR using type-specific primers for the determination of genotypes of HBV A through H. RESULTS: Four genotypes (A, B, C and D) out of total eight reported genotypes so far were identified. Genotypes A, B and C were predominant. HBV genotype C was the most predominant in this collection, appearing in 46 samples (41.07%). However, the genotypes of a total of 5 (4.46%) samples could not be determined with the present genotyping system. Mixed genotypes were seen in 8 (7.14%) HBV isolates. Five of these were infected with genotypes A/D whereas two were with genotypes C/D. One patient was infected with 4 genotypes (A/B/C/D). Genotype A (68%) was predominant in Sindh; genotype C was most predominant in North West Frontier Province (N.W.F.P.) (68.96) whereas genotypes C and B were dominant in Punjab (39.65% and 25.86% respectively). CONCLUSION: All the four common genotypes of HBV found worldwide (A, B, C and D) were isolated. Genotype C is the predominant. Genotypes B and C are predominant in Punjab and N.W.F.P whereas genotype A is predominant in Sindh.

DNA, Viral↗

Southeast Asian patients with chronic hepatitis C: the impact of novel genotypes and race on treatment outcome.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype and other host and viral factors influence treatment outcome in chronic HCV infection. We evaluated the effect of race and genotype on interferon and ribavirin treatment outcome in 70 Southeast Asian (SEA) and 50 white patients. Genotype was based on the 5' untranslated region (5'UTR) with a commonly used line probe assay (INNO-LiPA HCV II) that may mistype genotype 7, 8, or 9 as 1b. HCV core region sequencing resulted in reclassification of 8 genotype 1 and 25 genotype 1b SEA subjects as genotype 7, 8, or 9. Twenty-six SEA genotype 7, 8, and 9 (79%) and 10 SEA true genotype 1b (59%) patients achieved a sustained virologic response (SVR) compared with 15 (34%) white genotype 1b patients. Logistic regression analysis showed that SEA patients with genotype 7, 8, or 9 were more likely to achieve a SVR than white genotype 1b patients (OR 16.56; 95%CI 4.16, 65.91) as were SEA true genotype 1b patients compared with white genotype 1b patients (OR 4.63; 95%CI 1.19, 18.04). In conclusion, a proportion of SEA patients classified by INNO-LiPA as genotype 1b were in reality genotype 7, 8, or 9. In comparison with white genotype 1b patients, both SEA genotype 1b and SEA genotype 7, 8, and 9 patients showed a significantly greater SVR. HCV core sequencing was necessary to determine genotype accurately in persons potentially exposed to HCV genotypes 7, 8, or 9. This study also supports the concept that race and ethnicity are important determinants of treatment outcome in HCV infected patients.

Adult↗

Genotyping hepatitis C virus isolates from Spain, Brazil, China, and Macau by a simplified PCR method.

An improved and simplified method of genotyping was developed for classifying hepatitis C virus (HCV) isolates into the five common genotypes, i.e., I/1a, II/1b, III/2a, IV/2b, and V/3a, by PCR with genotype-specific primers deduced from the core gene. Sense and antisense primers, specific for each of the five common genotypes, were designed by comparison of 319 core gene sequences from HCV isolates of various genotypes from genetic groups 1 to 9. In the first round of PCR, a sequence of 433 bp representing nucleotides 319 to 751 was amplified with universal primers. The second round of PCR was performed with respective sense and antisense primers in two separate reactions, one for the amplification of genotypes I/1a and II/1b and the other for the amplification of genotypes III/2a, IV/2b, and V/3a. The specificity of genotyping was confirmed with a panel of 191 serum samples containing HCV isolates whose core gene sequences were known: 110 serum samples infected with HCV of the five common genotypes and 81 serum samples infected with HCV of other genotypes. The use of sense and antisense primers for genotype II/1b (primers 389 and 492) abolished the cross-reaction of the antisense primer for genotype II/1b (primer 133) with some HCV isolates of genotype I/1a found by our original method. The new method was used for genotyping 130 HCV isolates from Spain, 53 from Brazil, 106 from China, and 30 from Macau. A total of 329 bp of the NS5b region (nucleotides 8279 to 8607) of five isolates from Spain and five isolates from Macau which could not be classified as any of the five common HCV genotypes or genotype 2c were sequenced, and the sequences were compared with those of HCV isolates of known genotypes; two isolates from Spain were deduced to be of genotype 4d and one was deduced to be of genotype 1d, while the remaining two isolates from Spain had novel genotypes in genetic group 2; however, all five isolates from Macau were of genotype 6a.

Brazil↗

Hepatitis B virus genotypes and hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan.

With phylogenetic analysis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) isolates, eight different genotypes (A to H) have been recognized worldwide. The impact of HBV genotypes on the clinical aspects of HBV infection in Taiwan, including the clinical outcome of chronic infection and therapeutic response to antiviral treatments, has been clarified. Our data showed that genotypes B and C are the predominant HBV strains in Taiwan, and genotype C is associated with more severe liver disease including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), whereas genotype B is associated with the development of HCC in young noncirrhotic patients. Serologically, genotype C tends to have a higher frequency of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positivity and a higher serum HBV DNA level than genotype B. In addition, genotype C patients, compared to genotype B patients, have a delayed HBeAg seroconversion in the immune clearance phase of chronic HBV infection. Virologically, genotype C bears a higher frequency of basal core promoter mutation than genotype B. Our recent data further indicated that patients with basal core promoter mutation are significantly more associated with the development of HCC than those without, which applies to both genotypes B and C. In addition, the prevalence of basal core promoter mutation in young HCC patients is comparable to older HCC patients but is significantly higher than that in age-matched inactive carriers, irrespective of genotypes. Although superinfection of HBV on hepatitis B carriers indeed occurs in Taiwan, it is rarely associated with acute exacerbations. As to the response to antiviral treatments, genotype C is associated with a lower response rate to interferon therapy compared to genotype B. In addition, genotype B seems to have a better virological response to lamivudine as compared to genotype C, but both genotypes have a similar risk in the development of lamivudine resistance. These lines of evidence highlight the remarkable differences in the clinical and virological characteristics between Taiwanese patients infected with different genotypes. In conclusion, pathogenic and therapeutic differences do exist among HBV genotypes in Taiwan, and determining the genotype in patients with chronic HBV infection would help gain further information in anthropologic, clinical, virological and prognostic investigations.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular↗

A real-time Taqman method for hepatitis C virus genotyping.

BACKGROUND: There is the need for a rapid, inexpensive method for genotyping hepatitis C virus (HCV) to support clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To develop a real-time (Rotor-Gene 3000) Taqman assay for HCV genotyping in a single tube. STUDY DESIGN: Seven type-specific probes, two for genotypes 1-3 and one for genotype 4 were designed around genotype-specific motifs in the 5' non-coding (NC) region to create two panels of probes. The first panel included two probes for genotype 1 detection and a single probe each for genotypes 2 and 3. The second panel had two probes for confirmation of genotypes 2 and 3 and a first line probe for genotype 4 detection. A comparative analysis of the Taqman assay against our in-house sequence-based method using 154 consecutive clinical samples, from HCV carriers in Cambridge, and four samples from the Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics (QCMD) System was undertaken. RESULTS: 158 samples were analysed by conventional sequencing: 49% (n=78) were genotype 1, 11% (n=18) genotype 2, 30% (n=47) genotype 3 and 6% (n=10) genotype 4. For two samples, the sequence data was heterogeneous and difficult to analyse, suggesting mixed infection and for three samples, the viral load was insufficient for sequencing. Concordant results were obtained with the novel Taqman assay for 77/78 (99%) of genotype 1 isolates (positive with both genotype 1 probes), 17/18 (94%) of genotype 2 isolates, 43/47 (91%) of genotype 3 isolates and 10/10 (100%) genotype 4 isolates. One isolate, untypeable with sequencing was genotyped with the Taqman assay. CONCLUSIONS: The Taqman assay was sensitive, specific and reliable over a wide range of viral loads and could identify mixed infections. These results highlight the potential of the Taqman assay as a fast, accurate and convenient method for routine HCV genotyping.

5' Untranslated Regions↗

Comparative study of genotype B and C hepatitis B virus-induced chronic hepatitis in relation to the basic core promoter and precore mutations.

BACKGROUND: The clinicopathological profiles and outcome of chronic hepatitis B can differ by hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes. In Japan, genotype B and C are two major HBV genotypes. The basic core promoter and precore mutations are other known viral factors for disease activity, although the relationship between HBV genotypes and these mutations is not fully understood. METHODS: The HBV genotypes in 90 patients with chronic hepatitis B were determined using an ELISA. Obtained data were correlated with clinicopathological parameters, basic core promoter, precore and the nucleotide 1858 mutations of the HBV genome. RESULTS: Among 90 cases, 20 (22.2%) had genotype B and 70 (77.8%) had genotype C HBV. Genotype B patients were older than genotype C patients (44.0 +/- 13.9 vs 34.7 +/- 11.0 P = 0.0022). The HBeAg was more prevalent in genotype C than B patients (P = 0.0008) while anti-HBe was more common in genotype B than C patients (P = 0.0002). Serum aspartate aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase levels (B: 220.7 +/- 612.8/257.0 +/- 498.0 IU/L vs C: 111.3 +/- 122.8/201.6 +/- 229.4 IU/L, P = 0.16/0.48) and HBV viral loads in blood (B: 6.1 +/- 3.1 log genome equivalent [LGE]/mL vs C: 6.7 +/- 2.3 LGE/mL, P = 0.42) were equivalent. The seroconversion from HBeAg to anti-HBe occurred significantly earlier in genotype B than C patients (62 +/- 53 months vs 136 +/- 54 months, P = 0.0028) during the mean observation period of 149 +/- 82 months even under various therapeutic modalities. The categories III and IV of the histological activity index in genotype C were higher (III: P < 0.005, IV: P < 0.05, n = 68) than that in B patients whereas category II was higher in genotype B than C patients (P < 0.05). The double mutation (1762T/1764A) in the basic core promoter was more frequently found in genotype C than in B HBV (P = 0.0068), whereas the precore mutation (1896A) was more common in genotype B than C HBV (P = 0.0233). The incidence of 1858C that was complementary to the precore mutation site in the stem-loop structure in, was equally rare in both genotype B and C HBV. CONCLUSIONS: Genotype B patients were older, had earlier HBeAg seroconversion and exhibited more severe lobular necroinflammation, less portal inflammation and fibrosis than genotype C patients. This genotypic difference is related to the basic core promoter and precore mutations irrespective of 1858C. (c) 2004 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Adult↗

Prevalence of hepatitis C genotypes in Indian patients and their clinical significance.

AIM: To study the significance of hepatitis C genotypes in relation to severity of liver disease, progression of liver disease and response to treatment. METHODS: Sixty one consecutive patients with hepatitis C infection were evaluated with detailed history, clinical examination, biochemical, imaging and virological profile, liver histology whenever feasible. Hepatitis C infection was confirmed with AntiHCV third generation ELISA assay. HCVRNA by PCR and HCV genotyping by direct sequencing. RESULTS: Demographic profile of patients was as M:F 36:25, mean age 46.3 +/- 13.6 years (range 10 to 70 years). Clinical presentations of these patients were as cirrhosis 23, cirrhosis with HCC 3, chronic hepatitis 22, acute hepatitis 4, asymptomatic with normal enzymes nine. Distribution of genotypes was as follows; 13/61 (21%) genotype I, 15/61 (25%) genotypes II and 33/61 (54%) genotype III. Cirrhosis was significantly common in genotype I (77%) when compared to genotype II and III (33%); p < 0.001. Mean time of presenting as cirrhosis was much faster in genotype I (8.7 +/- 6.7 years) as compared to other genotypes (type II 12.8 +/- 4.2 years and genotype III 15.8 +/- 6.9 years). Genotype distribution in CRF and renal transplant patient was genotype I 8/23 (35%), genotype II 5/23 (22%) and genotype III 10/23 (43%). Fourteen patients were treated with interferon and ribavarine combination for one year. Sustained response seen in 8/14 (57%). All these patients had genotype non 1. All the four patients with Genotype I were non-responders. CONCLUSION: Hepatitis C genotype III is common in India, Genotype I runs a more severe course, faster progression and non responders to interferon as compared with genotype II and III.

Adolescent↗