Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “GPCR”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14Linked to original sources

Regulation of G protein function: implications for heart disease.

Heterotrimeric GTP-binding and -hydrolyzing proteins (G proteins) link members of a family of seven-helix transmembrane receptors (G protein-coupled receptors, GPCR) to intracellular effectors. The coupling mechanism involves the G protein completing a cycle of activation, dissociation into alpha and beta gamma subunits, deactivation, and reassociation. At the center of this cycle is the alpha subunit, in which activation by GPCR, GTPase activity, and regulation of effector are combined. Whereas G alpha's functional domains and residues had already been inferred from mutagenesis studies, the recent solution of the crystal structure has elucidated the structural basis of alpha subunit function. It is now clear that an irregularity in any GPCR pathway component could cause a physiological defect. This is confirmed by the identification of mutations in GPCR and G alpha's in various human diseases. Although several cardiomyopathies are associated with abnormal GPCR function, mutations are unlikely in these disorders. The last few years, other aspects of G protein function have moved into focus: e.g. posttranslational modifications; effector regulation by beta gamma subunits; GTPase activating protein (GAP) activity of effectors; G protein expression levels etc. When comparing the regulation of G protein functional activity in cAMP and in inositol phosphate generating pathways, an extrapolation can be made to data on the status of these pathways in some cardiovascular diseases.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗

D-myo-inositol 1-phosphate as a surrogate of D-myo-inositol 1,4,5-tris phosphate to monitor G protein-coupled receptor activation.

Phospholipase C beta (PLC-beta)-coupled G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activities traditionally are assessed by measuring Ca2+ triggered by D-myo-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3), a PLC-beta hydrolysis product, or by measuring the production of inositol phosphate using cumbersome radioactive assays. A specific detection of IP3 production was also established using IP3 binding proteins. The short lifetime of IP3 makes this detection very challenging in measuring GPCR responses. Indeed, this IP3 rapidly enters the metabolic inositol phosphate cascade. It has been known for decades that lithium chloride (LiCl) leads to D-myo-inositol 1-phosphate accumulation on GPCR activation by inhibiting inositol monophosphatase, the final enzyme of the IP3 metabolic cascade. We show here that IP1 can be used as a surrogate of IP3 to monitor GPCR activation. We developed a novel homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF) assay that correlates perfectly with existing methods and is easily amenable to high-throughput screening. The IP-One assay was validated on various GPCR models. It has the advantage over the traditional Ca2+ assay of allowing the measurement of inverse agonist activity as well as the analysis of PLC-beta activity in any nontransfected primary cultures. Finally, the high assay specificity for D-myo-inositol 1 monophosphate (IP1(1)) opens new possibilities in developing selective assays to study the functional roles of the various isoforms of inositol phosphates.

Animals↗

How accurately can we discriminate G-protein-coupled receptors as 7-tms TM protein sequences from other sequences?

The group of 2502 transmembrane (TM) protein sequences with seven TM segments (7-tms) registered in SWISS-PROT 46.0 contains 2200 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), indicating that GPCR candidates can be detected with a reliability of 87.9% in the eukaryotic genomes merely by correctly predicting the number of TM segments as 7-tms. The predictive accuracies of TM topology-prediction methods proposed so far are not as high as expected; even the best method, HMMTOP 2.0, can only achieve a capture rate of 7-tms sequences of 77.6%. It is necessary to improve this performance as much as possible, even if by only a few percentage points, in order to identify as many novel GPCR candidate genes as possible among the increasing number of newly sequenced genomes. In this study, we propose a simple but useful prediction method for detecting as many 7-tms TM protein sequences as GPCR candidates in eukaryotic genomes as possible. This is achieved by employing a two-step prediction procedure. The first step involves collecting 7-tms sequences by the best prediction method (HMMTOP 2.0), and the second involves picking up the remaining 7-tms sequences by the second-best method (TMHMM 2.0). By this procedure, the capture rate of 7-tms TM protein sequences in SWISS-PROT can be improved considerably from 77.6% to 84.5%, and the number of GPCR candidate sequences predicted as 7-tms in the human genome (Build 35) is increased from 790 (by HMMTOP 2.0) to 903. These 790 and 903 candidate sequences include, respectively, 587 and 636 of the known human GPCRs of the 717 registered in SWISS-PROT 46.0, demonstrating that the proposed combinatorial method is effective in detecting GPCR candidate genes in eukaryotic genomes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Automated derivation and refinement of sequence length patterns for protein sequences using evolutionary computation.

Several stratagems are used in protein bioinformatics for the classification of proteins based on sequence, structure or function. We explore the concept of a minimal signature embedded in a sequence that defines the likely position of a protein in a classification. Specifically, we address the derivation of sparse profiles for the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) clan of integral membrane proteins. We present an evolutionary algorithm (EA) for the derivation of sparse profiles (signatures) without the need to supply a multiple alignment. We also apply an evolution strategy (ES) to the problem of pattern and profile refinement. Patterns were derived for the GPCR 'superfamily' and GPCR families 1-3 individually from starting populations of randomly generated signatures, using a database of integral membrane protein sequences and an objective function using a modified receiver operator characteristic (ROC) statistic. The signature derived for the family 1 GPCR sequences was shown to perform very well in a stringent cross-validation test, detecting 76% of unseen GPCR sequences at 5% error. Application of the ES refinement method to a signature developed by a previously described method [Sadowski, M.I., Parish, J.H., 2003. Automated generation and refinement of protein signatures: case study with G-protein coupled receptors. Bioinformatics 19, 727-734] resulted in a 6% increase of coverage for 5% error as measured in the validation test. We note that there might be a limit to this or any classification of proteins based on patterns or schemata.

Algorithms↗

Identification and characterization of G protein-coupled receptors in the nocturnal halictid bee Megalopta genalis.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are one of the largest families of membrane proteins in insects, regulating vision, neural signal transduction, and various physiological behaviors. Megalopta genalis exhibits a unique facultatively eusocial lifestyle and possesses adaptations for nocturnal activity; however, its GPCR family has not yet been systematically characterized. In this study, we performed genome-wide identification, phylogenetic analysis, and expression profiling of GPCRs in M. genalis by integrating genomic annotation and transcriptomic analysis. The results showed that a total of 99 GPCRs were identified in the genome of M. genalis, which were classified into four major families. Here, we show that M. genalis has undergone lineage-specific GPCR repertoire remodeling, marked by the expansion of novel orphan receptors and the systematic loss of multiple receptor subtypes, such as the neuropeptide receptors MIP-R and NPFR. Moreover, opsins have formed a diverse array of combinations and non-GPCR odorant receptors have undergone significant expansion via tandem duplication. Together, these features may represent part of the molecular repertoire associated with the adaptation of M. genalis to a nocturnal lifestyle. Furthermore, transcriptomic analysis revealed distinct spatiotemporal expression divergence within each of the Mth/Mthl and Fz GPCR families, suggesting functional specialization across development and adult tissues. This study provides the first systematic identification and initial functional characterization of GPCRs in M. genalis, revealing an evolutionary pattern characterized by the coexistence of contraction and expansion within the GPCR family. These findings lay a foundation for further studies aimed at elucidating the roles of these GPCRs in regulating M. genalis physiology and behavior.

Animals↗

Mass-dependent signaling between G protein coupled receptors.

The present study provides evidence that G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathways participate in an interactive signaling network governed by the principles of mass action. Using an inducible thromboxane A2 receptor (TPR)/platelet activating factor receptor (PAFR) co-expressing cell model, TPR or PAFR expression was independently up-regulated. Immunostaining and radioligand binding experiments demonstrated that this receptor up-regulation resulted in increased GPCR:G protein mass ratios. This increase in mass ratio impacted both TPR and PAFR ligand affinity. Specifically, up-regulating TPR expression not only decreased TPR ligand affinity, but also decreased the ligand affinity of PAFRs. A similar effect on ligand affinities was observed when PAFRs were up-regulated. In addition, increasing the GPCR:G protein mass ratio for TPRs led to desensitization of the calcium mobilization response to PAFR activation, and increasing PAFR mass desensitized the TPR-mediated calcium response. Finally, it was observed that an increased TPR:G protein mass ratio was associated with a shift in the TPR signaling response, and revealed an additional TPR signaling pathway through G(S). Collectively, these results describe a novel mechanism, i.e., mass-dependent GPCR signaling, by which cells can modulate their GPCR signaling pathways and signaling priorities.

15-Hydroxy-11 alpha,9 alpha-(epoxymethano)prosta-5↗

Automatic gene collection system for genome-scale overview of G-protein coupled receptors in eukaryotes.

We have developed an automatic system for identifying GPCR (G-protein coupled receptor) genes from various kinds of genomes, which is finally deposited in the SEVENS database (http://sevens.cbrc.jp/), by integrating such software as a gene finder, a sequence alignment tool, a motif and domain assignment tool, and a transmembrane helix predictor. SEVENS enables us to perform a genome-scale overview of the "GPCR universe" using sequences that are identified with high accuracy (99.4% sensitivity and 96.6% specificity). Using this system, we surveyed the complete genomes of 7 eukaryotes and 224 prokaryotes, and found that there are 4 to 1016 GPCR genes in the 7 eukaryotes, and only a total of 16 GPCR genes in all the prokaryotes. Our preliminary results indicate that 11 subfamilies of the Class A family, the Class 2(B) family, the Class 3(C) family and the fz/smo family are commonly found among human, fly, and nematode genomes. We also analyzed the chromosomal locations of the GPCR genes with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and found that species-specific families, such as olfactory, taste, and chemokine receptors in human and nematode chemoreceptor in worm, tend to form clusters extensively, whereas no significant clusters were detected in fly and plant genomes.

Animals↗

G-protein-coupled receptor dimerization: modulation of receptor function.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the largest family of transmembrane receptors in the human genome that respond to a plethora of signals, including neurotransmitters, peptide hormones, and odorants, to name a few. They couple to second messenger signaling cascade mechanisms via heterotrimeric G-proteins. Recently, many studies have revealed that GPCRs exist as dimers, which may be present as homo- or heterodimers/oligomers. These recent findings have been met with skepticism, since they are contradictory to the dogma that GPCRs function as monomers. Although the existence of GPCR dimers/oligomers was predicted from early pharmacological and biochemical studies, further studies to critically evaluate this phenomenon were impeded by the lack of appropriate reagents. The availability of cDNAs for GPCRs, of highly selective ligands and of antibodies for these receptors has made it possible to visualize and investigate the functional effects of GPCR oligomers. Pharmacological studies, along with biochemical techniques, such as cross-linking and immunoprecipitation with differentially epitope-tagged receptors, have been employed to demonstrate the oligomerization of a number of GPCRs. Moreover, recent biophysical techniques, such as bioluminescence and fluorescence resonance energy transfer, now make it possible to examine GPCR dimerization/oligomerization in living cells. In this review, we provide a brief overview of some of the techniques employed to describe GPCR dimers, and we discuss their respective limitations. We also examine the implications of dimerization/oligomerization on GPCR function. In addition, we discuss domains of the receptors that are thought to facilitate dimerization/oligomerization. Finally, we consider recent evidence for the subcellular localization of the dimer/oligomer assembly.

Dimerization↗

Evidence for kinship between diverse G-protein coupled receptors.

In an earlier publication we described similarities at the primary sequence level between the first probable plant G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) and three GPCR families (families A, B and F according to Kolakowski's classification) that were previously considered evolutionarily unrelated. Here we analyze further the relatedness among different GPCR families. By using PSI-BLAST, which is a search algorithm that is more potent in detecting weak similarities, one finds additional similarities between GPCR families that have not previously been described. Based on these comparisons, it is possible to divide all the GPCR families into one large clade and two smaller ones. The large clade includes the rhodopsin family (family A), the glucagon receptor family (family B), cyclic AMP receptors (family F), an Arabidopsis thaliana receptor, the Frizzled family and probably also the STE3 pheromone receptors (family E) and vomeronasal receptors type 1. The smaller clades consist of, in one case, BOSS and the GABA-B family of receptors (family C), and in the other the STE2 pheromone receptors (family D) alone. Although our findings are likely to reflect a common ancestry within each of these clades, whether or not two or all three of the clades also share an even more ancient ancestor between them remains an open question that cannot be answered from our present data.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Quantitative and dynamic analyses of G protein-coupled receptor signaling in yeast using Fus1, enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP), and His3 fusion protein.

The mechanism of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling in yeasts is similar to that in mammalian cells. Therefore, yeasts can be used in GPCR assays, and several ligand detection systems using a pheromone signaling pathway in yeasts have been developed by employing yeasts with disrupted chromosomal genes that code for proteins producing specific effects. In this study, the construction of yeast strains that can detect ligand binding mediated by interactions between the G protein and GPCR using either fluorescence or auxotrophic selectivity is demonstrated. The strain was constructed by integrating the fusion gene of pheromone-responsive protein (FUS1), enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP), and auxotrophic marker protein (HIS3) into the FUS1 locus. Moreover, the influence of gene disruptions on the yeast signal transduction cascade is closely investigated with respect to both quantitative and dynamic aspects to further develop a high-throughput screening system for the GPCR assay using yeasts. Yeast strains with a disrupted SST2 gene, which is a member of the RGS (regulator of G protein signaling) family, and a disrupted FAR1 gene, which mediates cell cycle arrest in response to a pheromone, were monitored by measuring their fluorescence and growth rate. This method will be applicable to other comprehensive GPCR ligand screening methods.

Biological Assay↗

A screening library for peptide activated G-protein coupled receptors. 1. The test set.

One subset of the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily is that which is activated by a peptide carrying an obligatory positively charged residue (GPCR-PA(+)). This subclass is exemplified by receptors for melanocortins, GnRH, galanin, MCH, orexin, and some chemokine receptors variously involved in eating disorders, reproductive disorders, pain, narcolepsy, obesity, and inflammation. Using the methods described in this study, a region of chemical property space enriched in GPCR ligands was identified. This information was used to design and synthesize a "test" library of 2025 single, pure compounds to sample portions of this property space associated with GPCR-PA(+) ligands. The library was evaluated by high-throughput screening against three different receptors, rMCH, hMC4, and hGnRH, and found to be highly enriched in active ligands (4.5-61-fold) compared to a control set of 2024 randomly selected compounds. In addition, the analysis suggested that about 7000 compounds will be necessary to complete the sampling of this GPCR-PA(+) ligand-rich region and to better define its borders.

Animals↗

G-protein-coupled receptor affinity prediction based on the use of a profiling dataset: QSAR design, synthesis, and experimental validation.

A QSAR model accounting for "average" G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) binding was built from a large set of experimental standardized binding data (1939 compounds systematically tested over 40 different GPCRs) and applied to the design of a library of "GPCR-predicted" compounds. Three hundred and sixty of these compounds were randomly selected and tested in 21 GPCR binding assays. Positives were defined by their ability to inhibit by more than 70% the binding of reference compounds at 10 microM. A 5.5-fold enrichment in positives was observed when comparing the "GPCR-predicted" compounds with 600 randomly selected compounds predicted as "non-GPCR" from a general collection. The model was efficient in predicting strongest binders, since enrichment was greater for higher cutoffs. Significant enrichment was also observed for peptidic GPCRs and receptors not included to develop the QSAR model, suggesting the usefulness of the model to design ligands binding with newly identified GPCRs, including orphan ones.

Combinatorial Chemistry Techniques↗

The evolving role of lipid rafts and caveolae in G protein-coupled receptor signaling: implications for molecular pharmacology.

The many components of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signal transduction provide cells with numerous combinations with which to customize their responses to hormones, neurotransmitters, and pharmacologic agonists. GPCRs function as guanine nucleotide exchange factors for heterotrimeric (alpha, beta, gamma) G proteins, thereby promoting exchange of GTP for GDP and, in turn, the activation of 'downstream' signaling components. Recent data indicate that individual cells express mRNA for perhaps over 100 different GPCRs (out of a total of nearly a thousand GPCR genes), several different combinations of G-protein subunits, multiple regulators of G-protein signaling proteins (which function as GTPase activating proteins), and various isoforms of downstream effector molecules. The differential expression of such protein combinations allows for modulation of signals that are customized for a specific cell type, perhaps at different states of maturation or differentiation. In addition, in the linear arrangement of molecular interactions involved in a given GPCR-G-protein-effector pathway, one needs to consider the localization of receptors and post-receptor components in subcellular compartments, microdomains, and molecular complexes, and to understand the movement of proteins between these compartments. Co-localization of signaling components, many of which are expressed at low overall concentrations, allows cells to tailor their responses by arranging, or spatially organizing in unique and kinetically favorable ways, the molecules involved in GPCR signal transduction. This review focuses on the role of lipid rafts and a subpopulation of such rafts, caveolae, as a key spatial compartment enriched in components of GPCR signal transduction. Recent data suggest cell-specific patterns for expression of those components in lipid rafts and caveolae. Such domains likely define functionally important, cell-specific regions of signaling by GPCRs and drugs active at those GPCRs.

Caveolae↗

Monitoring the formation of dynamic G-protein-coupled receptor-protein complexes in living cells.

GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) play an extremely important role in transducing extracellular signals across the cell membrane with high specificity and sensitivity. They are central to many of the body's endocrine and neurotransmitter pathways, and are consequently a major drug target. It is now clear that GPCRs interact with a range of proteins, including other GPCRs. Identifying and elucidating the function of such interactions will significantly enhance our understanding of cellular function, with the promise of new and improved pharmaceuticals. Biophysical techniques involving resonance energy transfer, namely FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) and BRET (bioluminescence resonance energy transfer), now enable us to monitor the formation of dynamic GPCR-protein complexes in living cells, in real time. Their use has firmly established the concept of GPCR oligomerization, as well as demonstrating GPCR interactions with GPCR kinases, beta-arrestins, adenylate cyclase and a subunit of an inwardly rectifying K+ channel. The present review examines recent technological advances and experimental applications of FRET and BRET, discussing particularly how they have been adapted to extract an ever-increasing amount of information about the nature, specificity, stoichiometry, kinetics and agonist-dependency of GPCR-protein interactions.

Animals↗

p90 ribosomal S6 kinase 2 exerts a tonic brake on G protein-coupled receptor signaling.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are essential for normal central CNS function and represent the proximal site(s) of action for most neurotransmitters and many therapeutic drugs, including typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs. Similarly, protein kinases mediate many of the downstream actions for both ionotropic and metabotropic receptors. We report here that genetic deletion of p90 ribosomal S6 kinase 2 (RSK2) potentiates GPCR signaling. Initial studies of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(2A) receptor signaling in fibroblasts obtained from RSK2 wild-type (+/+) and knockout (-/-) mice showed that 5-HT(2A) receptor-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis and both basal and 5-HT-stimulated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation are augmented in RSK2 knockout fibroblasts. Endogenous signaling by other GPCRs, including P2Y-purinergic, PAR-1-thrombinergic, beta1-adrenergic, and bradykinin-B receptors, was also potentiated in RSK2-deficient fibroblasts. Importantly, reintroduction of RSK2 into RSK2-/- fibroblasts normalized signaling, thus demonstrating that RSK2 apparently modulates GPCR signaling by exerting a "tonic brake" on GPCR signal transduction. Our results imply the existence of a novel pathway regulating GPCR signaling, modulated by downstream members of the extracellular signal-related kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. The loss of RSK2 activity in humans leads to Coffin-Lowry syndrome, which is manifested by mental retardation, growth deficits, skeletal deformations, and psychosis. Because RSK2-inactivating mutations in humans lead to Coffin-Lowry syndrome, our results imply that alterations in GPCR signaling may account for some of its clinical manifestations.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Essential role for G protein-coupled receptor endocytosis in the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase.

The classical paradigm for G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signal transduction involves the agonist-dependent interaction of GPCRs with heterotrimeric G proteins at the plasma membrane and the subsequent generation, by membrane-localized effectors, of soluble second messengers or ion currents. Termination of GPCR signals follows G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK)- and beta-arrestin-mediated receptor uncoupling and internalization. Here we show that these paradigms are inadequate to account for GPCR-mediated, Ras-dependent activation of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases Erk1 and -2. In HEK293 cells expressing dominant suppressor mutants of beta-arrestin or dynamin, beta2-adrenergic receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase is inhibited. The inhibitors of receptor internalization specifically blocked Raf-mediated activation of MEK. Plasma membrane-delimited steps in the GPCR-mediated activation of the MAP kinase pathway, such as tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc and Raf kinase activation by Ras, are unaffected by inhibitors of receptor internalization. Thus, GRKs and beta-arrestins, which uncouple GPCRs and target them for internalization, function as essential elements in the GPCR-mediated MAP kinase signaling cascade.

Arrestins↗

Pleiotropic coupling of G protein-coupled receptors to the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Role of focal adhesions and receptor tyrosine kinases.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) initiate Ras-dependent activation of the Erk 1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade by stimulating recruitment of Ras guanine nucleotide exchange factors to the plasma membrane. Both integrin-based focal adhesion complexes and receptor tyrosine kinases have been proposed as scaffolds upon which the GPCR-induced Ras activation complex may assemble. Using specific inhibitors of focal adhesion complex assembly and receptor tyrosine kinase activation, we have determined the relative contribution of each to activation of the Erk 1/2 cascade following stimulation of endogenous GPCRs in three different cell types. The tetrapeptide RGDS, which inhibits integrin dimerization, and cytochalasin D, which depolymerizes the actin cytoskeleton, disrupt the assembly of focal adhesions. In PC12 rat pheochromocytoma cells, both agents block lysophosphatidic acid (LPA)- and bradykinin-stimulated Erk 1/2 phosphorylation, suggesting that intact focal adhesion complexes are required for GPCR-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in these cells. In Rat 1 fibroblasts, Erk 1/2 activation via LPA and thrombin receptors is completely insensitive to both agents. Conversely, the epidermal growth factor receptor-specific tyrphostin AG1478 inhibits GPCR-mediated Erk 1/2 activation in Rat 1 cells but has no effect in PC12 cells. In HEK-293 human embryonic kidney cells, LPA and thrombin receptor-mediated Erk 1/2 activation is partially sensitive to both the RGDS peptide and tyrphostin AG1478, suggesting that both focal adhesion and receptor tyrosine kinase scaffolds are employed in these cells. The dependence of GPCR-mediated Erk 1/2 activation on intact focal adhesions correlates with expression of the calcium-regulated focal adhesion kinase, Pyk2. In all three cell types, GPCR-stimulated Erk 1/2 activation is significantly inhibited by the Src kinase inhibitors, herbimycin A and 4-amino-5-(4-methylphenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo-D-3,4-pyrimidine (PP1), suggesting that Src family nonreceptor tyrosine kinases represent a point of convergence for signals originating from either scaffold.

Animals↗

Cell-specific extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation by multiple G protein-coupled receptor families in hippocampus.

Several families of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) have been shown to activate extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) in transfected cells and non-neuronal systems. However, little is known about GPCR activation of ERK in brain. Because ERK is an important component in the regulation of synaptic plasticity, in this study we examined ERK activation by three families of GPCR that respond to major neuromodulatory neurotransmitters in the hippocampus. We used an immunocytochemical approach to examine ERK activation by muscarinic acetylcholine (mAChR), metabotropic glutamate (mGluR), and beta-adrenergic (beta-AR) receptors in CA1 neurons of mouse hippocampal slices. Because these GPCR families comprise receptors coupling to each of the major heterotrimeric G proteins, we examined whether ERK activation differs according to G-protein coupling. By using immunocytochemistry, we were able to examine not only whether each family of receptors activates ERK, but also the cellular populations and subcellular distributions of activated ERK. We demonstrated that M1 mAChRs and group I mGluRs, both of which are Gq-coupled receptors, activate ERK in CA1 pyramidal neurons, although activation in response to mAChR is more robust. The G(i/o)-coupled group II mGluRs activate ERK in glia scattered throughout CA1, and Gs-coupled beta-AR receptors activate ERK in scattered interneurons. Thus, we demonstrated that GPCR coupling to Gq, G(i/o), and Gs all activate ERK in the hippocampus, although each does so with unique properties and distributions.

Animals↗