Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DEXAMETHASONE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14Linked to original sources

High concentration of dexamethasone in aqueous and vitreous after subconjunctival injection.

PURPOSE: To determine the dexamethasone concentration in aqueous, vitreous, and serum of patients after a subconjunctival injection with dexamethasone disodium phosphate and to compare the effectiveness of a subconjunctival injection as a method of delivering dexamethasone into the vitreous with that of two previously tested routes: peribulbar injection and oral administration. METHODS: In a prospective study, 50 phakic patients who underwent a pars plana vitrectomy received a single subconjunctival injection with 2.5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate, aqueous solution (after topical anesthesia and a subconjunctival injection with lidocaine) at varied intervals before surgery. An aqueous and a vitreous sample were taken from each patient, and serum samples were collected at multiple time points from nine of 50 patients. Dexamethasone concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: The estimated maximum dexamethasone concentration in the aqueous was 858 ng per ml at 2.5 hours after injection, and in the vitreous, 72.5 ng per ml at 3 hours. In serum, a mean maximum concentration of 32.4 ng per ml was measured at approximately 30 minutes after injection. CONCLUSIONS: Subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate resulted in an estimated vitreous dexamethasone peak concentration three and 12 times higher, respectively, than after a peribulbar injection of 5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate and an oral dose of 7.5 mg of dexamethasone. Thus, a subconjunctival injection is the most effective method of delivering dexamethasone into both the anterior and posterior segments of the eye. Systemic drug absorption is considerable and is of the same order of magnitude as after peribulbar injection.

Adult↗

Effects of dexamethasone on metallothionein induction by Zn, Cu, and Cd in Chang liver cells.

Metallothioneins (MTs) were induced in Chang liver cells by the metals, Zn, Cu and Cd, and the glucocorticoid hormone, dexamethasone. When 116 microM Zn, 32 microM Cu and 18 microM Cd, and 10(-7) M dexamethasone, respectively, were administered for 9 h, MTs induced by each inducer in the cells reached maximum levels. The maximum accumulation of MT level induced by dexamethasone was the lowest of the four inducers investigated; the levels induced by Zn, Cu and Cd were 4.7, 1.2 and 1.5 times of that induced by dexamethasone. When dexamethasone was added to the cells together with the heavy metals (Zn, Cu and Cd), dexamethasone had an additive effect on the maximum MT accumulations induced by heavy metals as compared to when induction was conducted using one of heavy metals alone or by dexamethasone alone. However, dexamethasone did almost not effect the metal accumulations in the cells, although the maximum MT levels induced by heavy metal increased by dexamethasone. These results suggest that the process of MT induction by heavy metals and that by dexamethasone are independent of one another. When dexamethasone was added to the cells together with a high concentration of Cu (32 microM) induced the maximum MT accumulation, Cu transport into the cells decreased by 20-40% of that into non-treated cells, which was statistically significant.

Adult↗

Dexamethasone stimulates the expression of GLUT1 and GLUT4 proteins via different signalling pathways in L6 skeletal muscle cells.

It was recently demonstrated that dexamethasone treatment of L6 skeletal muscle cells resulted in an elevation of GLUT1 protein. However, the level of GLUT4 protein under these conditions was not examined. In addition, the signalling mechanism(s) leading to dexamethasone-induced expression of GLUT1 protein was not investigated. In the present study we investigated the effect of dexamethasone on the expression of GLUT1 and GLUT4 proteins in differentiated L6 muscle cells and the signalling mechanism(s) via which dexamethasone may act. Dexamethasone (300 nM) treatment for 24 h elevated GLUT1 and GLUT4 proteins by 68% and 94%, respectively, above control levels. These increases were due to de novo synthesis as shown by metabolic labelling with [35S]methionine. Incubation of cells with 100 nM wortmannin or 30 ng/ml rapamycin prevented the dexamethasone-stimulated elevation of GLUT1 protein. In contrast, neither of these inhibitors affected the elevation of GLUT4 protein by dexamethasone. Furthermore, dexamethasone down-regulated insulin receptor substrate-1 protein content by 42% and insulin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 by 28%. The p70 ribosomal S6 kinase was not activated by dexamethasone and instead, dexamethasone attenuated the stimulation of this enzyme activity by insulin. These results suggest that dexamethasone induces the expression of GLUT1 and GLUT4 protein by independent signalling mechanisms with a concomitant depression of intracellular signalling by insulin.

Androstadienes↗

Dexamethasone megadoses stabilize rat liver lysosomal membranes by non-genomic and genomic effects.

PURPOSE: Membrane-stabilizing effects may be part of glucocorticoid action during high-dose glucocorticoid therapy. The present study investigates the mode of action of dexamethasone megadoses on rat liver lysosomal membranes. METHODS: Following intravenous administration of dexamethasone in rats, the release of beta-glucuronidase from liver lysosomes was assessed ex vivo as a marker for lysosomal membrane integrity. RESULTS: Dexamethasone megadoses significantly inhibited beta-glucuronidase release 10 min post-administration by 38% (3 mg/kg dexamethasone) and 33% (10 mg/kg dexamethasone) at corresponding dexamethasone liver concentrations of 3.9 x 10(-5) mol/kg and 15.1 x 10(-5) mol/kg, respectively. Comparable inhibition of beta-glucuronidase release (34% for 3 mg/kg and 38% for 10 mg/kg) was observed 24 h after administration of dexamethasone, although dexamethasone liver concentrations had already declined to 0.09 x 10(-5) mol/kg and 0.19 x 10(-5) mol/kg, respectively. A 2-h oral pretreatment of rats with the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist RU 486 (10 mg/kg) did not alter immediate (10 min) stabilization by dexamethasone (3 mg/kg). but almost completely prevented lysosomal membrane protection 24 h after dexamethasone injection. CONCLUSIONS: Dexamethasone megadoses may preserve lysosomal membrane integrity by a dual action involving both rapid nongenomic effects occurring instantaneously after administration and long-term receptor-dependent genomic events.

Animals↗

Changes in c-myc expression and the kinetics of dexamethasone-induced programmed cell death (apoptosis) in human lymphoid leukaemia cells.

The kinetics of dexamethasone-induced death of CCRF CEM clone C7A human lymphoblastic leukaemia cells was determined with respect to changes in the expression of the c-myc protein. Cell death was characterised as being by apoptosis: cells with an intact plasma membrane had condensed chromatin and were characterised as having approximately 300 kbp fragments when DNA integrity was analysed by pulsed-field electrophoresis. Onset of apoptosis required a minimum of 36 h exposure to 5 microM dexamethasone; before this time no apoptotic cells were observed. This 36 h incubation period appeared to be necessary to prime the cells for subsequent death by apoptosis. In the continued presence of dexamethasone the percentage of apoptotic cells increased to 60% apoptotic cells by 54 h. Investigation of changes in c-myc protein showed that it was undetectable after 12 h of incubation with dexamethasone, although cells were not committed to die at this time. Cells were treated with dexamethasone for 54 h and for various pulsed periods with a non-toxic concentration of cycloheximide (200 nM). When cycloheximide was present during the first 36 h priming period of dexamethasone treatment, there was an immediate loss of c-myc protein and apoptosis at 54 h was completely inhibited. In contrast, there was no inhibition of apoptosis when dexamethasone-treated cells were incubated with an 18 h pulse of cycloheximide added after 36 h. Cells exposed to dexamethasone for 36 h ('primed') were given various periods of dexamethasone-free incubation before readdition of dexamethasone for a further 18 h. The longer the cells were free of drug after priming, the less susceptible they became to apoptosis, suggesting a slow decay of their 'memory' of the initial 36 h period of exposure. Cycloheximide inhibited the decay of this memory. Removal of dexamethasone after a 36 h exposure was characterised by a subsequent 24 h suppression of c-myc protein expression. Despite this, 90% of cells became refractory to apoptosis before the reappearance of c-myc protein. The evidence does not support the hypothesis that changes in c-myc expression are required for the engagement of apoptosis of CEM cells.

Apoptosis↗

Effect of dexamethasone on lymphocyte subpopulations in premature infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine the effect of dexamethasone treatment on peripheral blood lymphocyte counts and subpopulations in premature infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). STUDY DESIGN: Peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations in 12 premature infants with BPD were analyzed before treatment with a 6-week course of dexamethasone (day 0), on days 3 and 10 of treatment, and 2 weeks after discontinuing dexamethasone therapy (day 56). Lymphocyte immunophenotypes were determined using direct two-color immunofluorescent staining followed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: The percentage of lymphocytes was significantly lower on days 3 (17.55 +/- 2.55) and 10 (20 +/- 11.8) of dexamethasone therapy compared with before (30.36 +/- 6.41) or after treatment. The percentage of T cells was significantly lower on days 3 and 10 of dexamethasone therapy (mean +/- SEM; 58.09 +/- 1.93 and 60.09 +/- 2.47, respectively) compared with before (67.09 +/- 4.24) or after treatment. The absolute number of T cells was significantly lower on day 10 of therapy. The percentage of CD4+ cells was significantly lower on days 3 (38.91 +/- 2.49) and 10 (40.45 +/- 2.24) of therapy, and this decrease persisted after dexamethasone was stopped (36.73 +/- 3.41). The absolute number of CD4 cells was significantly lower on day 10 (1328 +/- 216) of therapy and reached a nadir on day 56 (1143 +/- 106). Similarly, the CD4/CD8 ratio was also significantly lower on days 3 and 10 of treatment (1.56 +/- 0.18 and 1.64 +/- 0.14, respectively) and reached a nadir on day 56 (1.04 +/- 0.13). CONCLUSION: Dexamethasone significantly reduced the percentage and absolute number of lymphocytes, T cells, and CD4 cells, as well as the CD4/CD8 ratio. A reduction in CD4 cells and in the CD4/CD8 ratio persisted 2 weeks after dexamethasone therapy was stopped. In contrast, the absolute number of B cells increased transiently, and CD8 cells were unaffected by dexamethasone. This alteration in lymphocyte subpopulations may help account for the clinically beneficial anti-inflammatory effect of dexamethasone in the treatment of BPD complicated by respiratory failure. The dexamethasone-induced decrease in CD4 cells may also increase the susceptibility of these infants to infection.

B-Lymphocytes↗

Stimulation of apolipoprotein secretion in very-low-density and high-density lipoproteins from cultured rat hepatocytes by dexamethasone.

The effects of dexamethasone (a synthetic glucocorticoid) and insulin on the secretion of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were investigated. Rat hepatocytes in monolayer culture were preincubated for 15 h in the presence or absence of combinations of 100 nM-dexamethasone and 2 nM-, 10 nM- or 50 nM-insulin. Dexamethasone increased [3H]oleate incorporation into secreted triacylglycerol by 2.7-fold and the mass of triacylglycerol secreted by 1.5-fold. Insulin alone decreased these parameters and antagonized the effect of dexamethasone. Dexamethasone increased the secretion of [3H]leucine in apolipoprotein (apo) E, and in the large (BH) and small (BI) forms of apo B in VLDL by about 7.1-, 3.6- and 4.0-fold respectively. Insulin alone decreased the secretion of these 3H-labelled apolipoproteins in VLDL. However, 2 nM-insulin with dexamethasone increased the secretion of 3H-labelled apo BH and apo BL by a further 0.8- and 3.2-fold respectively; 50 nM-insulin decreased the secretions of apo E, apo BH and apo BL in VLDL. Similar effects for dexamethasone or insulin alone were also obtained for the masses of apo E and apo BL + H secreted in VLDL. Albumin secretion was not significantly altered by either dexamethasone or insulin alone, but in combination they stimulated by 2.1-2.6-fold. Insulin or dexamethasone alone had little effect on the secretion of apolipoproteins in the HDL fraction. However, dexamethasone plus 2 nM-insulin increased the incorporation of [3H]leucine into apo AI, apo AH plus apo C, apo AIV and apo E of HDL by about 1.8-, 1.6-, 1.7- and 2.0-fold respectively. The apo E in the bottom fraction represented about 69% of the total 3H-labelled apo E secreted. The responses in the total secretion of apo E from the hepatocytes resembled those seen in HDL. The interactions of insulin and dexamethasone are discussed in relation to the general regulation of lipoprotein metabolism, the development of hyperlipidaemias and the predisposition to premature atherosclerosis.

Albumins↗

Administration of G--CSF plus dexamethasone produces greater granulocyte concentrate yields while causing no more donor toxicity than G--CSF alone.

BACKGROUND: G-CSF with or without dexamethasone is becoming the standard agent for mobilizing granulocytes for transfusion. The purpose of this study was to determine if the toxicities of G--CSF with or without dexamethasone are offset by greater collection yields and to define the minimum interval that should separate sequential collections. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty donors were studied on three occasions. They were given either dexamethasone (8 mg, by mouth) plus a placebo injection, G--CSF (5 microg/kg, given subcutaneously) plus placebo capsules, or G--CSF plus dexamethasone. Granulocytes were collected by apheresis. A donor symptom survey was administered, and cell counts and blood chemistries were assessed before collection and 1, 2, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 days after collection. RESULTS: More granulocytes were collected when G--CSF was given than when dexamethasone was given (41.1 +/- 20.4 x 10(9) vs. 21.0 +/- 10.0 x 10(9); p<0.001), but the use of G--CSF plus dexamethasone produced the greatest yields (67.1 +/- 22.0 x 10(9); p<0.002). When the donors were given dexamethasone alone, 58 percent experienced at least one symptom, compared to 85 percent of those given G--CSF and 75 percent of those given G--CSF plus dexamethasone. In all three regimens, platelet counts fell 19 percent to 24 percent after collection and remained below baseline for 7 to 14 days. Granulocyte counts returned to baseline within 3 to 7 days, but, in all three regimens, a mild granulocytopenia occurred 21 days after collection. With each of the regimens, blood chemistries changed, but the changes were mild and most returned to baseline within 7 days; however, changes in albumin, bilirubin, and AST persisted until 28 days after collection. CONCLUSION: These results support the use of G--CSF plus dexamethasone in granulocyte donors. G--CSF plus dexamethasone resulted in greater granulocyte yields than either agent alone and was associated with donor symptoms and changes in blood cell counts and chemistries similar to those seen with G--CSF alone or dexamethasone alone. Granulocytes can be safely collected a second time after a 7-day interval; however, for regular donors, it may be best to separate collections by 4 weeks.

Adult↗

Kinetics of G-CSF-induced granulocyte mobilization in healthy subjects: effects of route of administration and addition of dexamethasone.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte donors are frequently given G-CSF with or without dexamethasone approximately 18 hours before apheresis to increase cell yields. The purpose of this study was to assess the kinetics of G-CSF plus dexamethasone neutrophil mobilization to determine whether the neutrophils can be mobilized and collected the same day. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixteen subjects were given four separate mobilization regimens: IV G-CSF (5 microg/kg), subcutaneous G-CSF (5 microg/kg), IV G-CSF (5 microg/kg) plus oral dexamethasone (8 mg), and subcutaneous G-CSF (5 microg/kg) plus oral dexamethasone (8 mg). Blood cell counts were measured before and after G-CSF administration. RESULTS: Following all four mobilization regimens, neutrophil counts fell 0.5 hour after the mobilizing agents were given, rose above baseline levels at Hour 2, and increased further with each time interval to Hour 8. In the absence of dexamethasone at Hours 2 through 8, there was no difference in neutrophil counts by subcutaneous or IV G-CSF administration routes. The addition of dexamethasone enhanced mobilization of neutrophils from Hours 3 through 24. Through Hour 8, there was no difference in the degree of mobilization among the subcutaneous G-CSF plus dexamethasone and the IV G-CSF plus dexamethasone regimens. However, at Hour 24, neutrophil counts were sustained at higher levels with subcutaneous G-CSF plus dexamethasone than with IV G-CSF plus dexamethasone. CONCLUSIONS: Granulocyte mobilization response to subcutaneous G-CSF plus dexamethasone is sustained at peak levels for 8 to 24 hours after coadministration of the two drugs. There was no advantage to giving G-CSF intravenously.

Administration, Oral↗

Favorable combination effects of the leukotriene synthesis inhibitor BAY X 1005 and dexamethasone on edema formation in the arachidonic acid-induced mouse ear inflammation test.

The effects of a combination of the leukotriene synthesis inhibitor (LSI) BAY X 1005 with the glucocorticosteroid dexamethasone were studied in the arachidonic acid (AA)-induced mouse ear inflammation test (AA-MEIT). We have determined the dose-dependent effects of dexamethasone to reduce edema formation when a combination of 25 mg/kg BAY X 1005 and increasing dosages of dexamethasone was administered orally (p.o.). The inhibition of ear thicknesses increases with the combination therapy were compared with the inhibition observed when both compounds were applied alone. The edema inhibition at the fixed oral dose of 25 mg/kg p.o. BAY X 1005 was 57+/-2%. Dexamethasone alone dose-dependently inhibited edema formation with a flat inhibition curve at dosages ranging from 0.008 mg/kg (11+/-13%) to 0.5 mg/kg (651+/-11%). In combination with BAY X 1005, the corresponding inhibition curve for dexamethasone was shifted upward starting from 56+/-13% at 0.008 mg/kg. At the two highest dexamethasone dosages (0.125 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg) an identical inhibition (86+/-10%) was observed indicating a plateauing of the antiedematous effect of this combination. The results indicate that at suitable dosages (0.031 mg/kg and 0.125 mg/kg) the effects of BAY X 1005 and dexamethasone were additive. To further corroborate the combination effects of BAY X 1005 and dexamethasone the 5-HT receptor antagonist methysergide and the H1 receptor antagonist pyrilamine were employed as a pretreatment to eliminate mouse-specific inflammation responses. In the methysergide/pyrilamine (12.5 mg/kg s.c. each)-conditioned AA-MEIT model 85+/-3% edema reduction were observed with BAY X 1005 and 74+/-3% with dexamethasone. The combination of 25 mg/kg BAY X 1005 and 0.5 mg/kg dexamethasone was slightly more effective in the conditioned AA-MEIT (90+/-3%) than either compound alone. Our results demonstrate that the LSI BAY X 1005 interacted favorably with the glucocorticosteroid dexamethasone suggesting a potentially useful new combination strategy to treat acute inflammatory disease conditions. This effect can be explained on the basis of the mechanisms of action of both therapeutic principles.

Animals↗

The beneficial effects of early dexamethasone administration in infants and children with bacterial meningitis.

BACKGROUND: In experimental models of meningitis and in children with meningitis, dexamethasone has been shown to reduce meningeal inflammation and to improve the outcome of disease. METHODS: We conducted a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of dexamethasone therapy in 101 infants and children admitted to the National Children's Hospital, San José, Costa Rica, who had culture-proved bacterial meningitis or clinical signs of meningitis and findings characteristic of bacterial infection on examination of the cerebrospinal fluid. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either dexamethasone and cefotaxime (n = 52) or cefotaxime plus placebo (n = 49). Dexamethasone (0.15 mg per kilogram of body weight) was given 15 to 20 minutes before the first dose of cefotaxime and was continued every 6 hours thereafter for four days. RESULTS: The demographic, clinical, and laboratory profiles were similar for the patients in the two treatment groups. By 12 hours after the beginning of therapy, the mean opening cerebrospinal pressure and the estimated cerebral perfusion pressure had improved significantly in the dexamethasone-treated children but worsened in the children treated only with cefotaxime (controls). At 12 hours meningeal inflammation and the concentrations of two cytokines (tumor necrosis factor alpha and platelet-activating factor) in the cerebrospinal fluid had decreased in the dexamethasone-treated children, whereas in the controls the inflammatory response in the cerebrospinal fluid had increased. At 24 hours the clinical condition and mean prognostic score were significantly better among those treated with dexamethasone than among the controls. At follow-up examination after a mean of 15 months, 7 of the surviving 51 dexamethasone-treated children (14 percent) and 18 of 48 surviving controls (38 percent) had one or more neurologic or audiologic sequelae (P = 0.007); the relative risk of sequelae for a child receiving placebo as compared with a child receiving dexamethasone was 3.8 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 11.5). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study, in which dexamethasone administration began before the initiation of cefotaxime therapy, provide additional evidence of a beneficial effect of dexamethasone therapy in infants and children with bacterial meningitis.

Adolescent↗

A multicenter trial of two dexamethasone regimens in ventilator-dependent premature infants.

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-dependent premature infants are often treated with dexamethasone. However, the optimal timing of therapy is unknown. METHODS: We compared the benefits and hazards of initiating dexamethasone therapy at two weeks of age and at four weeks of age in 371 ventilator-dependent very-low-birth-weight infants (501 to 1500 g) who had respiratory index scores (mean airway pressure x the fraction of inspired oxygen) of 52.4 at two weeks of age. One hundred eighty-two infants received dexamethasone for two weeks followed by placebo for two weeks, and 189 infants received placebo for two weeks followed by either dexamethasone (those with a respiratory-index score of > or =2.4 on treatment day 14) or additional placebo for two weeks. Dexamethasone was given at a dose of 0.25 mg per kilogram of body weight twice daily intravenously or orally for five days, and the dose was then tapered. RESULTS: The median time to ventilator independence was 36 days in the dexamethasone-placebo group and 37 days in the placebo-dexamethasone group. The incidences of chronic lung disease (defined as the need for oxygen supplementation at 36 weeks' postconceptional age) were 66 percent and 67 percent, respectively. Dexamethasone was associated with an increased incidence of nosocomial bacteremia (relative risk, 1.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.1) and hyperglycemia (relative risk, 1.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 3.0) in the dexamethasone-placebo group, elevated blood pressure (relative risk, 2.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 6.9) in the placebo-dexamethasone group, and diminished weight gain and head growth (P< 0.001) in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of ventilator-dependent premature infants with dexamethasone at two weeks of age is more hazardous and no more beneficial than treatment at four weeks of ages.

Age Factors↗

Dexamethasone alone or in combination with ondansetron for the prevention of delayed nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The prevention of delayed nausea and vomiting caused by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy for cancer has not been studied systematically. METHODS: We enrolled patients who were scheduled to receive chemotherapy for the first time in a double-blind, randomized, multicenter study. All the patients received ondansetron combined with dexamethasone for prophylaxis against emesis that might occur within 24 hours after the start of chemotherapy (acute emesis). They were then divided into two groups: patients who did not have either vomiting or moderate-to-severe nausea (the low-risk group) and patients who had one or both (the high-risk group). Patients in the low-risk group were then randomly assigned to one of the following regimens, given on days 2 through 5 after the start of chemotherapy: oral placebo, 4 mg of dexamethasone given orally twice daily, or 8 mg of ondansetron in combination with 4 mg of dexamethasone, given orally twice daily. Patients in the high-risk group were randomly assigned to receive oral dexamethasone alone or in combination with ondansetron at the same doses as those used in the low-risk group. RESULTS: Among the 618 patients in the low-risk group, there was a complete absence of both delayed vomiting and moderate-to-severe nausea in 91.8 percent of those who received ondansetron combined with dexamethasone, 87.4 percent of those who received dexamethasone alone, and 76.8 percent of those who received placebo. The proportions of patients who were protected by dexamethasone combined with ondansetron or by dexamethasone alone were significantly greater than the proportion protected by placebo (P<0.001 and P<0.02, respectively). Of the 87 patients in the high-risk group, complete protection was achieved in 40.9 percent of those treated with ondansetron and dexamethasone and in 23.3 percent treated with dexamethasone alone (P not significant). CONCLUSIONS: The best way to prevent delayed nausea and vomiting in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy is to control these complications within the first 24 hours after the start of chemotherapy. Dexamethasone alone provides adequate protection against delayed emesis in patients at low risk (those who have not had acute emesis).

Aged↗

Adverse effects of early dexamethasone treatment in extremely-low-birth-weight infants. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network.

BACKGROUND: Early administration of high doses of dexamethasone may reduce the risk of chronic lung disease in premature infants but can cause complications. Whether moderate doses would be as effective but safer is not known. METHODS: We randomly assigned 220 infants with a birth weight of 501 to 1000 g who were treated with mechanical ventilation within 12 hours after birth to receive dexamethasone or placebo with either routine ventilatory support or permissive hypercapnia. The dexamethasone was administered within 24 hours after birth at a dose of 0.15 mg per kilogram of body weight per day for three days, followed by a tapering of the dose over a period of seven days. The primary outcome was death or chronic lung disease at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. RESULTS: The relative risk of death or chronic lung disease in the dexamethasone-treated infants, as compared with those who received placebo, was 0.9 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.8 to 1.1). Since the effect of dexamethasone treatment did not vary according to the ventilatory approach, the two dexamethasone groups and the two placebo groups were combined. The infants in the dexamethasone group were less likely than those in the placebo group to be receiving oxygen supplementation 28 days after birth (P=0.004) or open-label dexamethasone (P=0.01), were more likely to have hypertension (P<0.001), and were more likely to be receiving insulin treatment for hyperglycemia (P=0.02). During the first 14 days, spontaneous gastrointestinal perforation occurred in a larger proportion of infants in the dexamethasone group (13 percent, vs. 4 percent in the placebo group; P=0.02). The dexamethasone-treated infants had a lower weight (P=0.02) and a smaller head circumference (P=0.04) at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. CONCLUSIONS: In preterm infants, early administration of dexamethasone at a moderate dose has no effect on death or chronic lung disease and is associated with gastrointestinal perforation and decreased growth.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗

Rat and human aortic smooth muscle cells display differing migration and matrix metalloproteinase activities in response to dexamethasone.

OBJECTIVE: The steroid dexamethasone inhibits neointimal hyperplasia development in rats but not in humans. This study investigates the differential effects of dexamethasone on rat and human smooth muscle cell migration and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity. METHODS: Rat aortic smooth muscle cells were harvested from Sprague-Dawley rats. Human aortic smooth muscle cells were obtained from Clonetics. Boyden chamber migration assays were performed with chemoattractant (platelet-derived growth factor) and varying concentrations of dexamethasone (10(-9) to 10(-5) mol/L). Zymography of culture media was used to assess MMP activity, and Western blot analysis was used for quantification of MMP-2 and tissue inhibitor of MMP-2 (TIMP-2) secretion. RESULTS: Dexamethasone inhibits rat aortic smooth muscle cell migration in a dose-dependent fashion. An increase in concentrations of dexamethasone does not effect human aortic smooth muscle cell migration. Rat aortic smooth muscle cell MMP-2 activity is inhibited with dexamethasone in a dose-dependent fashion, and human aortic smooth muscle cell MMP-2 activity is unchanged with dexamethasone. MMP-2 secretion is inhibited with dexamethasone in rat aortic smooth muscle cells but remains unaltered in human aortic smooth muscle cells. Dexamethasone increases rat aortic smooth muscle cell TIMP-2 secretion, and human aortic smooth muscle cell TIMP-2 secretion remains constant. CONCLUSION: Dexamethasone inhibits rat aortic smooth muscle cell migration, MMP-2 activity, and MMP-2 secretion and increases TIMP-2 secretion. These effects are not observed in human aortic smooth muscle cells. These findings may explain why dexamethasone inhibits neointimal hyperplasia in animal models but is ineffective in humans. Inhibition of human smooth muscle cell migration in vitro may be useful in predicting the effectiveness of future therapeutic agents for treatment of neointimal hyperplasia in humans.

Animals↗

Ondansetron plus dexamethasone is superior to ondansetron alone in the prevention of emesis in chemotherapy-naive and previously treated patients. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK).

BACKGROUND: This prospective, randomized, double-blind study assessed whether the addition of dexamethasone to ondansetron leads to improved control of chemotherapy--induced emesis, both in patients undergoing their first course of highly emetogenic chemotherapy and in chemotherapy-pretreated patients refractory to standard anti-emetics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive either 20 mg dexamethasone as an intravenous infusion or placebo plus ondansetron 8 mg 15 minutes prior to and 4 and 8 hours after the administration of chemotherapy. According to the randomisation code patients received from day 2 to day 5 either ondansetron 8 mg p.o. + placebo p.o., three times daily, or ondansetron 8 mg p.o. + dexamethasone 4 mg p.o., three times daily. Patients undergoing multiple-day treatment received intravenous study treatment on the days of chemotherapy and thereafter oral treatment as outlined above. RESULTS: A total of 215 patients were entered into the study. Of these, 207 were evaluable (111 previously-untreated and 96 previously-treated patients). In the chemotherapy-naive patients the combination of ondansetron plus dexamethasone was significantly superior to ondansetron plus placebo in protecting the patients completely from emesis (retching and vomiting) (81% versus 64%, p = 0.04). The mean number of vomiting episodes was significantly lower in the ondansetron-plus-dexamethasone-treated patients than in those receiving ondansetron plus placebo (0.8 versus 2.1, p = 0.03). In this group of patients there was significantly superior protection from emesis on the second day (p-value = 0.04), and a trend towards a better protection on the third and fourth days. On each day the active combination offered better protection from nausea with an approximately 20% difference in favor of ondansetron plus dexamethasone. In the group of established vomiters the combination of ondansetron plus dexamethansone was superior to ondansetron plus placebo in protecting the patients from acute emesis, with 70% versus 48% of the patients being completely protected (p = 0.03). The mean number of vomiting episodes was significantly lower in the ondansetron-plus-dexamethasone-treated-patients than in those receiving ondansetron plus placebo (0.9 versus 2.1, p = 0.02). In the ondansetron-plus-dexamethasone arm 55% of the patients had complete protection from nausea, retching and vomiting compared to 35% in the ondansetron-plus-placebo-treated group (p = 0.05). Overall 22% of the patients (20% in the ondansetron-plus-placebo and 25% in the ondansetron-plus-dexamethasone arm) experienced at least one, usually mild, adverse event. More patients in the ondansetron-plus-dexamethasone arm complained of epigastric pain or burning (8/101 versus 4/112, p-value = 0.16). The difference in patients reporting constipation (6/101 versus 0/112) was highly significant at a p-value of 0.008. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of dexamethasone plus ondansetron is more effective in protecting chemotherapy-naive patients undergoing their first course of highly emetogenic chemotherapy with cisplatin and chemotherapy-pretreated patients refractory to standard antiemetics from chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting compared to ondansetron plus placebo.

Adolescent↗

Dexamethasone inhibits inducible nitric-oxide synthase expression and nitric oxide production by destabilizing mRNA in lipopolysaccharide-treated macrophages.

Nitric oxide (NO) production through the inducible nitric-oxide synthase (iNOS) pathway is increased in inflammatory diseases and leads to cellular injury. Anti-inflammatory steroids inhibit the expression of various inflammatory genes, including iNOS. In the present study, we investigated the mechanism how dexamethasone decreased NO production in murine J774 macrophages. Dexamethasone (0.1-10 microM) inhibited the production of NO and iNOS protein in a dose-dependent manner in cells stimulated with lipopolysaccharides (LPS). In contrast, in cells treated with a combination of LPS and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), dexamethasone did not reduce iNOS expression and NO formation. Dissociated glucocorticoid RU24858 inhibited iNOS expression and NO production to levels comparable with that of dexamethasone, suggesting that the reduced iNOS expression by dexamethasone is not a GRE-mediated event. In further studies, the effect of dexamethasone on iNOS mRNA levels was tested by actinomycin assay. The half-life of iNOS mRNA after LPS treatment was 5 h 40 min, and dexamethasone reduced it to 3 h. The increased degradation of iNOS mRNA was reversed by a protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide. iNOS mRNA was more stabile in cells treated with a combination of LPS plus IFN-gamma (half-life = 8 h 20 min), and dexamethasone had a minor effect in these conditions. In conclusion, dexamethasone decreases iNOS-dependent NO production by destabilizing iNOS mRNA in LPS-treated cells by a mechanism that requires de novo protein synthesis. Also, decreased iNOS mRNA and protein expression and NO formation by dexamethasone was not found in cells treated with a combination of LPS plus IFN-gamma, suggesting that the effect of dexamethasone is stimulus-dependent.

Animals↗

Dexamethasone inhibits prostaglandin release from rabbit coronary microvessel endothelium.

The effects of dexamethasone on prostaglandin secretion by cultivated rabbit coronary microvascular endothelial (RCME) cells were investigated. Incubation of RCME cells with dexamethasone resulted in a time- and concentration-dependent decrease in prostaglandin accumulation in the culture media and reduced basal and A23187-stimulated prostaglandin (PG) E2 and 6-keto-PGF1 alpha release. The maximal effects of dexamethasone (50-80% inhibition) were achieved after 16-18 h of incubation with the steroid at a final concentration of 10(-7) M. The effects of dexamethasone treatment were partially reversed 24 h after removal of the steroid from the culture media. Dexamethasone treatment did not reduce arachidonic acid-stimulated prostaglandin synthesis, indicating that the level of inhibition was proximal to that of cyclooxygenase. The inhibitory effects of dexamethasone could be prevented by pretreatment of the RCME cells with actinomycin D or cycloheximide, suggesting a requirement for protein synthesis in the inhibitory action of dexamethasone. Conditioned media from dexamethasone-treated cells contained a factor that inhibited porcine pancreatic phospholipase A2 (PLA2) in vitro. Transfer of conditioned media from dexamethasone-treated cells to untreated cells did not reduce basal or stimulated prostaglandin release; in contrast, a stimulatory action was consistently observed. Adherence of rabbit peripheral polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) to RCME cells was reduced when the leukocytes were pretreated with 10(-7) M dexamethasone (4 h). However, dexamethasone pretreatment of the RCME cells did not significantly effect granulocyte adhesion. Thus coronary microvascular endothelial cell prostaglandin production is regulated by glucocorticoids, and glucocorticoid-pretreated microvascular endothelial cell release an inhibitor of PLA2 activity into the culture media.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

6-Ketoprostaglandin F1 alpha↗