Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Combination therapy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14Linked to original sources

A model-based approach for assessing in vivo combination therapy interactions.

We present an approach for evaluating the efficacy of combination antitumor agent schedules that accounts for order and timing of drug administration. Our model-based approach compares in vivo tumor volume data over a time course and offers a quantitative definition for additivity of drug effects, relative to which synergism and antagonism are interpreted. We begin by fitting data from individual mice receiving at most one drug to a differential equation tumor growth/drug effect model and combine individual parameter estimates to obtain population statistics. Using two null hypotheses: (i) combination therapy is consistent with additivity or (ii) combination therapy is equivalent to treating with the more effective single agent alone, we compute predicted tumor growth trajectories and their distribution for combination treated animals. We illustrate this approach by comparing entire observed and expected tumor volume trajectories for a data set in which HER-2/neu-overexpressing MCF-7 human breast cancer xenografts are treated with a humanized, anti-HER-2 monoclonal antibody (rhuMAb HER-2), doxorubicin, or one of five proposed combination therapy schedules.

Animals↗

An assessment of diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide in hypertension. Application of factorial trial design to a multicenter clinical trial of combination therapy.

This multicenter, factorial-design trial assessed the safety and additive antihypertensive efficacy of a slow-release (SR) formulation of diltiazem hydrochloride given alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide for treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. After a 4- to 6-week placebo run-in period, 297 qualifying patients were randomized to receive placebo, 1 of 4 doses of diltiazem SR monotherapy, 1 of 3 doses of hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy, or 1 of 12 possible combinations of diltiazem SR and hydrochlorothiazide for 6 weeks. A dose-related reduction in blood pressure was demonstrated for each drug as monotherapy and for the two drugs in combination. Absolute blood pressures of patients who received combination therapy were lower by an overall mean of 3.0 mm Hg diastolic and 8.0 mm Hg systolic vs diltiazem SR used alone and 3.5 mm Hg diastolic and 4.0 mm Hg systolic vs hydrochlorothiazide used alone. At the largest doses used, 50% of patients achieved goal blood pressure while taking hydrochlorothiazide, 57% while taking diltiazem SR, and 75% while taking combination therapy. Combination therapy was well tolerated. This trial clearly demonstrates that diltiazem SR and hydrochlorothiazide have additive antihypertensive effects.

Adult↗

Optimal treatment of dyslipidemia in high-risk patients: intensive statin treatment or combination therapy?

A recent update to the National Cholesterol Education Program's Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines suggests low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals of <70 mg/dL in very-high-risk patients and <100 mg/dL in high-risk patients. Currently available 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) are not equal in their ability to lower LDL-C, and it is unlikely that the substantial LDL-C reductions that are often needed in high-risk persons can be achieved with starting doses of some of the older statins. Possible alternatives in such cases include the use of high-dose statin therapy, a more efficacious statin, or combination therapy. Recent clinical data have demonstrated a greater likelihood of coronary heart disease event reduction with aggressive statin therapy that lowers LDL-C in a robust fashion (>30%-40%) than with moderate therapy. Until data from ongoing trials of combination therapy are available, however, monotherapy with a potent statin should be initiated to lower LDL-C. Nonetheless, for residual elevation in triglycerides and/or reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, adding a second agent (eg, fenofibrate, niacin) is a reasonable option.

Algorithms↗

[Changes in coagulation and fibrinolytic factors observed during heparin-urokinase-pulse combined therapy for nephritis resistant to conventional treatment in children].

Coagulation and fibrinolytic factors in the blood were measured during heparin-urokinase (UK)-pulse combined therapy in order to investigate the background for the availability of the therapy. Five patients with nephritis resistant to conventional treatment were treated with this combined therapy (heparin: 350-450 U/kg day, continuously i.v. during the therapy; UK: 5000 IU/kg/2 hrs, i.v., two times a day, for 3 days = 1 Kur; methylprednisolone 20 mg/kg/2hrs, d.i.v., for 3 days = 1 Kur; 3 Kurs of UK and 3 Kurs of pulse were alternately administered). 1) Blood levels of alpha 2-plasmin inhibitor (alpha 2-PI) antigen were decreased and those of alpha 2-plasmin inhibitor.plasmin complex (alpha 2-PI. PmC) were elevated during 3 Kurs of UK administration. Accordingly, activation of the fibrinolytic system was confirmed during the combined therapy, suggesting that both alpha 2-PI and alpha 2-PI.PmC were relevant in monitoring the fibrinolytic state in blood. 2) Both tissue-plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) levels were sustained continuously in the elevated levels in the blood during both UK administration and pulse therapy. This movement of t-PA and PAI-1 was independent of that of the other fibrinolytic factors, such as alpha 2-PI,alpha 2-PI.PmC and plasminogen. 3) Inflammatory reactants such as fibrinogen, alpha 2-PI,alpha 2-macroglobulin and alpha 1-antitrypsin decreased more significantly during this heparin-urokinase-pulse combined therapy than during our previous combined therapy consisting of only heparin and urokinase. Therefore, we conclude that the anti-inflammatory effect was reinforced by adding the pulse therapy and that the combined therapy had some effect on the release of t-PA from vascular endothelial cells.

Adolescent↗

Temozolomide in paediatric high-grade glioma: a key for combination therapy?

This report describes a single-centre study with temozolomide (TMZ) (200 mg m(-2) day(-1) x 5 per cycle of 28 days) in children with (recurrent) high-grade glioma. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed every two cycles. In all, 20 patients were treated between 1998 and 2001 after the UKCCSG/SFOP TMZ phase II trial. All patients had measurable disease. Totally, 15 patients had a relapse after surgery+/-radiotherapy+/-chemotherapy. Overall, five patients received TMZ after surgery or biopsy, awaiting radiotherapy. There were one clinically malignant grade II glioma, 11 grade III and eight grade IV gliomas. Seven tumours had oligodendroglial features. Mean age at start of TMZ was 12.0 years (range 3-20.5 years). In total, eight patients had >8 cycles (range 3-30). One VGPR (currently in CR after surgery), three PRs (with a PFS of 4, 4 and 11 months, respectively) and one MR (PFS 14 months) were observed. Three out of five responses occurred after >4 courses. The overall response rate was 20%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.0 months (range 3 weeks-34+ months). PFS rate was 20% after 6 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 10 months. Nine patients showed a clinical improvement. Three patients vomitted shortly after TMZ administration, eight patients (13 cycles) experienced grade III/IV thrombocytopenia, occurring predominantly during the fourth week of the first two cycles. Five patients experienced neutropenia, and three patients febrile neutropenia. TMZ is a well-tolerated ambulatory treatment for children with malignant glial tumours. This drug warrants further study in these highly chemoresistant tumours and should be studied either as upfront therapy or in combination therapy.

Administration, Oral↗

Sustained long-term immune responses after in situ gene therapy combined with radiotherapy and hormonal therapy in prostate cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To explore long-term immune responses after combined radio-gene-hormonal therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-three patients with prostate specific antigen 10 or higher or Gleason score of 7 or higher or clinical stage T2b to T3 were treated with gene therapy that consisted of 3 separate intraprostatic injections of AdHSV-tk on Days 0, 56, and 70. Each injection was followed by 2 weeks of valacyclovir. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy was delivered 2 days after the second AdHSV-tk injection for 7 weeks. Hormonal therapy was initiated on Day 0 and continued for 4 months or 2.3 years. Blood samples were taken before, during, and after treatment. Lymphocytes were analyzed by fluorescent antibody cell sorting (FACS). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 26 months (range, 4-48 months). The mean percentages of DR+CD8+ T cells were increased at all timepoints up to 8 months. The mean percentages of DR+CD4+ T cells were increased later and sustained longer until 12 months. Long-term (2.3 years) use of hormonal therapy did not affect the percentage of any lymphocyte population. CONCLUSIONS: Sustained long-term (up to 8 to 12 months) systemic T-cell responses were noted after combined radio-gene-hormonal therapy for prostate cancer. Prolonged use of hormonal therapy does not suppress this response. These results suggest the potential for sustained activation of cell-mediated immune responses against cancer.

Acyclovir↗

Effect of oral combination therapy with mexiletine and quinidine on left and right ventricular function.

Combination therapy with mexiletine (MEX) and quinidine (Q) may be more efficacious than monotherapy with either drug in suppressing ventricular arrhythmias, but its effects on ventricular performance are not known. Thus, right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and wall motion score (WMS) were assessed in 14 patients with ventricular tachycardia before antiarrhythmic therapy, during MEX and Q monotherapies, and during combination therapy. During monotherapy, the daily doses and serum drug levels were: MEX, 621 mg/day and 3.4 microM/L; Q, 1573 mg/day and 8.3 microM/L, respectively. With combination therapy, the daily doses and serum drug levels were: MEX, 636 mg/day and 3.3 microM/L; Q, 1643 mg/day and 9.5 microM/L, respectively. Drug therapy did not affect group LVEF (drug free = 36 +/- 19%, MEX = 34 +/- 18%, Q = 36 +/- 19%, and combination MEX-Q = 35 +/- 19%), RVEF (drug free = 34 +/- 11%, MEX = 35 +/- 11%, Q = 36 +/- 13%, and combination MEX-Q = 36 +/- 12%), or WMS. Ventricular function reserve was assessed in five patients. Drug therapy did not affect group exercise LVEF (drug free = 44 +/- 14%, MEX = 42 +/- 12%, Q = 43 +/- 13%, and MEX-Q = 45 +/- 12%), RVEF (drug free = 38 +/- 10%, MEX = 40 +/- 11%, Q = 39 +/- 12%, and MEX-Q = 40 +/- 12%), WMS, or exercise duration. Combination MEX-Q therapy did not have a significant effect on exercise performance or ventricular function in seven additional patients in whom no exercise studies were done during monotherapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cardiac Pacing, Artificial↗

Prolonged survival of rat hindlimb allografts following short-course FK506 and mycophenolate mofetil combination therapy.

The immunosuppressive effect of combined therapy using FK506 and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was studied in rat limb allotransplantation. Dark Agouti rat donor hindlimbs were orthotopically transplanted into Lewis rat recipients. In total, 38 models of transplantation were performed and divided into 8 groups that were treated individually or in combination with FK506 + MMF therapy. Animals were immunosuppressed for 28 days and then observed for up to 140 days. Graft rejection was evaluated both macroscopically and histologically. Survival times for rat limb allotransplants receiving combination FK506 + MMF therapy were significantly longer than with FK506 or MMF monotherapy, and this was achieved without serious side effects. A histopathological study demonstrated a significantly lower level of rejection with FK506 + MMF combination treatment compared to groups receiving FK506 or MMF monotherapy. Combined FK506 + MMF treatment can prolong the survival of rat limb allografts.

Animals↗

Cyclosporin A monotherapy versus cyclosporin A and methotrexate combination therapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a double blind randomised placebo controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of cyclosporin A (CsA) monotherapy with CsA plus methotrexate (MTX) combination therapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 120 patients with active RA, rheumatoid factor positive and/or erosive, were randomly allocated to receive CsA with MTX (n=60) or CsA with placebo (n=60). Treatment with CsA was started in all patients at 2.5 mg/kg/day and increased to a maximum of 5 mg/kg/day in 16 weeks. MTX was started at 7.5 mg/week and increased to a maximal dose of 15 mg/week at week 16. Primary outcomes were clinical remission (Pinals criteria) and radiological damage (Larsen score), at week 48. RESULTS: Treatment was discontinued prematurely in 27 patients in the monotherapy group (21 because of inefficacy, and six because of toxicity) and in 26 patients in the combination therapy group (14 and 12, respectively). At week 48, clinical remission was achieved in four patients in the monotherapy group and in six patients in the combination therapy group (p=0.5). The median Larsen score increased to 10 (25th, 75th centiles: 3.5; 13.3) points in the monotherapy group and to 4 (1.0; 10.5) points in the combination therapy group (p=0.004). 28/60 (47%) of patients in the monotherapy group v 34/60 (57%) of patients in the combination therapy group had reached an American college of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response (p=0.36) at week 48; 15/60 (25%) v 29/60 (48%) of patients had reached an ACR50 response (p=0.013); and 7 (12%) v 12 (20%) of patients had reached an ACR70 response (p=0.11). Their was a tendency towards more toxicity in the combination therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with early RA, neither CsA plus MTX combination therapy nor CsA monotherapy is very effective in inducing clinical remission. Combination therapy is probably better at improving clinical disease activity, and definitely better at slowing radiological progression. Combination therapy should still be compared with methotrexate monotherapy.

Adult↗

Radiofrequency ablation therapy combined with cementoplasty for painful bone metastases: initial experience.

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation therapy combined with cementoplasty under computed tomography and fluoroscopic guidance for painful bone metastases. Seventeen adult patients with 23 painful bone metastases underwent RF ablation therapy combined with cementoplasty during a 2-year period. The mean tumor size was 52 x 40 x 59 mm. Initial pain relief, reduction of analgesics, duration of pain relief, recurrence rate of pain, survival rate, and complications were analyzed. The technical success rate was 100%. Initial pain relief was achieved in 100% of patients (n=17). The mean VAS scores dropped from 63 to 24 (p<0.001) (n=8). Analgesic reduction was achieved in 41% (7 out of 17 patients). The mean duration of pain relief was 7.3 months (median: 6 months). Pain recurred in three patients (17.6%) from 2 weeks to 3 months. Eight patients died and 8 patients are still alive (a patient was lost to follow-up). The one-year survival rate was 40% (observation period: 1--30 months). No major complications occurred, but one patient treated with this combined therapy broke his right femur 2 days later. There was transient local pain in most cases, and a hematoma in the psoas muscle (n=1) and a hematoma at the puncture site (n=1) occurred as minor complications. Percutaneous RF ablation therapy combined with cementoplasty for painful bone metastases is effective and safe, in particular, for bulky tumors extending to extraosseous regions. A comparison with cementoplasty or RF ablation alone and their long-term efficacies is needed.

Aged↗

Effect of combination therapy including protease inhibitors on mortality among children and adolescents infected with HIV-1.

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy including protease inhibitors has been shown to be effective in treating adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), but there are only limited data regarding the treatment of children and adolescents. METHODS: A cohort of 1028 HIV-1-infected children and adolescents, from birth through 20 years of age, who were enrolled in research clinics in the United States before 1996 was followed prospectively through 1999. We used proportional-hazards regression models to estimate the effect on mortality of combination therapy including protease inhibitors. RESULTS: Seven percent of the subjects were receiving combination therapy including protease inhibitors in 1996; by 1999, 73 percent were receiving such therapy. In univariate analyses, a higher base-line percentage of lymphocytes that were CD4-positive, a higher weight for age, a higher height for age, black race, Hispanic ethnic background, younger age, and perinatally acquired infection were associated with a longer median time to the initiation of this type of therapy (P<0.001). After adjustment for covariates, the differences among racial and ethnic groups in the time to initiation were not statistically significant. Mortality declined from 5.3 percent in 1996 to 2.1 percent in 1997, 0.9 percent in 1998, and 0.7 percent in 1999 (P for trend <0.001). There were reductions in mortality in all subgroups defined according to age, sex, percentage of CD4+ lymphocytes, educational level of the parent or guardian, and race or ethnic background. In adjusted analyses, the initiation of combination therapy including protease inhibitors was independently associated with reduced mortality (hazard ratio for death, 0.33; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.19 to 0.58; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of combination therapy including protease inhibitors has markedly reduced mortality among children and adolescents infected with HIV-1.

Adolescent↗

Treating dyslipidemic patients with lipid-modifying and combination therapies.

Updated guidelines from the National Cholesterol Education Program give greater emphasis to lipoproteins other than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) than previous guidelines. Although statins remain first-line therapy for most patients to lower LDL, combination therapy is the next logical step in achieving goals in patients with mixed dyslipidemia or elevated LDL despite statin therapy. As the prevalence of diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and atherogenic dyslipidemia rises, the importance of treating the total lipid profile becomes even more crucial. Niacin, fibrates, and bile acid sequestrants are effective in combination with statins in lowering LDL, triglycerides, and total cholesterol levels and increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL). Although combination therapies may increase the risk of myopathy, both fibrate-statin and niacin-statin combinations are considered safe. In addition, niacin-statin therapy reduces atherosclerotic progression and coronary events. New pharmacologic formulations exist that will further affect treatment: a single-tablet combination of lovastatin and extended-release niacin is available, as is ezetimibe, a cholesterol-absorption inhibitor. In all, both HDL and triglyceride levels correlate with cardiovascular risk and should be considered secondary targets of therapy. Combination therapy can be safe and effective and can be constructed to affect all lipoprotein parameters.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Resistance to AZT and ddC during long-term combination therapy in patients with advanced infection with human immunodeficiency virus.

To ascertain whether combination therapy with zidovudine (AZT) and zalcitabine (ddC) delayed the emergence of AZT resistance, isolates of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) were evaluated from 15 previously untreated patients with advanced HIV disease who received combination therapy. Eighteen sequential viral isolates were available from 15 patients who received > or = 6 months of combination therapy. Isolates from eight (73%) of 11 patients obtained between 24 and 48 weeks of therapy were AZT resistant [50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) > or = 0.45 microM; range, 0.45-2.0 microM]. Four of these eight patients yielded virus isolates that were highly AZT resistant (IC50 > 1.0 microM). No changes in ddC susceptibility were discerned. The median IC50 for ddC was 0.2 microM and ranged from 0.07 to 0.5 microM. The CD4 cell counts of patients with AZT-sensitive virus tended to have higher median areas under the curve (AUC) and greater increases compared with patients who had AZT-resistant virus. They also had higher means and ranges of the average CD4 cell counts at week 36 (p = 0.01) and week 48 (p = 0.04). These data would indicate that the previously described more sustained CD4 cell responses conferred by the addition of ddC to AZT therapy cannot be ascribed to delayed emergence of AZT resistance with combination therapy.

CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes↗

Richlocaine in combined therapy of periodontitis.

The results of combined therapy of chronic moderate generalized periodontitis can be improved by adding richlocaine to protocols of drug therapy: the drug reduces the time of treatment, prolongs remission, decreases the number of relapses, and stabilizes pathological processes in periodontal tissues.

Adult↗

Combination therapy for multiple sclerosis.

To improve the partial benefit of approved monotherapies in multiple sclerosis (MS), over 25 combined therapies have been tested in recent years, either as fixed-dose or sequential combination regimes. The main therapeutic targets for combination therapy in MS are the same as for monotherapy: the immune-mediated inflammatory cascade, oxidative toxicity and excitotoxicity. There are numerous reasons to consider combination therapy in MS, including to improve the benefit and/or tolerance in patients responding to approved treatments, stop frequent disabling relapses and/or rapid progression in patients who do not respond to approved therapies, and maintain the benefit of immunosuppressive treatments. Preliminary clinical trials suggest that combination therapy in MS does not increase the side-effects of approved monotherapy; its efficacy over monotherapy should therefore be tested. Statistically robust trials would need to involve many patients for each combination, so the first step in determining the efficacy of combination therapy should be to perform safety studies, followed by proof-of-concept efficacy studies.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

A prospective clinical trial comparing chemotherapy, radiotherapy and combined therapy in the treatment of early stage Hodgkin's disease with bulky disease.

We performed a randomized clinical trial to assess the usefulness and toxicity of combined therapy compared with chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of early stage Hodgkin's disease with bulky disease as an adverse prognostic factor. Three-hundred and seven patients were enrolled into the study. They were randomized to receive either radiotherapy (extended field, generally mantle, 3500 cGy), or chemotherapy (adriamycin, bleomicin, vinblastine and dacarbazine: ABVD, 6 monthly) cycles or combined therapy (three cycles of ABVD, followed by irradiation therapy and three more cycles of chemotherapy). The median follow-up duration from start of treatment was 11.4 years. Complete response rates were similar in the three arms: 83% for radiotherapy (95% confidence interval [CI] 67-92%), 80% for chemotherapy (CI 69-88%) and 87% for combined therapy (CI 74-94%). However, disease-free survival and overall survival were better in the patients treated with combined therapy. At 12 years 76% (CI 51-93%) of the patients treated with combined therapy remained alive in the first complete remission compared with 42% (CI 26-61%) in patients treated with radiotherapy and 48% (CI 31-57%) in patients who had received chemotherapy alone (P < 0.01). Improvement in overall survival was also evident at 12 years: 88% (CI 59-93%) in those who had received combined therapy, compared with 53% (CI 36-67%) in the radiotherapy arm and 59% (CI 35-67%) in the chemotherapy group. Acute toxicity was more frequent in patients treated with combined therapy, but no death related treatment was observed in the three groups. Late toxicity was similar in the three treatment groups. Combined therapy with extended field radiotherapy and six cycles of chemotherapy is an effective treatment of patients with early stage bulky Hodgkin's disease compared with chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

[Levofloxacin in patients in the ICU. Factors influencing the choice of dose and its use in combined therapy].

This study aimed to identify factors that influence the selection of different approaches to prescribing levofloxacin (e.g., monotherapy vs. combined therapy, 12-h vs. 24-h interval) and the effect on mortality in the ICU. An observational, prospective, multicenter study was conducted. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the prescription of levofloxacin in combined therapy and at a dose of 500 mg every 12 hours. In addition, a logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the impact of the different prescribing methods on mortality in the ICU. The most frequently administered initial dose was 500 mg/24 h (48.5%) and 500 mg/12 h (48.3%). No factors were found to influence the choice of daily dose. A total of 49.7% of levofloxacin prescriptions were in combined therapy. Factors influencing the decision to prescribe a combined regimen included diagnosis of extra-ICU nosocomial infection (OR: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.13-3.42); severe sepsis (OR: 2.56; 95% CI: 1.66-3.94); septic shock (OR: 6.22; 95% CI: 3.54-10.9); and identification of the causative pathogen (OR: 1.99: 95% CI: 1.34-2.95). The mortality rate was 21.4% and the related factors were septic shock (OR: 3.09; 95% CI: 1.38-6.91); treatment failure (OR: 23.4; 95% CI: 12.3-44.6); and combined therapy (OR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.21-4.59). The selection of the initial dose of levofloxacin was not influenced by any factor, as long as the antibiotic was given in combined therapy in patients in whom the cause of the infection had been identified, in patients with greater systemic response, and in nosocomial infection outside the ICU. The selection of combined therapy was associated with a worse prognosis.

Anti-Infective Agents↗