Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ABDOMINAL INJURIES”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14Linked to original sources
PubMed1984

Severe thoracic and abdominal injuries associated with lap-harness seatbelts.

We report an unusual constellation of severe thoracic and abdominal injuries in a passenger restrained by a lap-harness seat belt during a high-speed automobile accident. This combination of injuries, which appears to have not previously been described, emphasizes the causative relationship of this protective device.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed1991

[The role of peritoneal lavage in treatment of penetrating abdominal injuries].

Preventing negative laparotomies is one of the most challenging problems in the management of penetrating abdominal injuries. The term "selective laparotomy" has been therefore introduced and has found an ever increasing acceptance. The peritoneal lavage is a useful tool in patient selection for laparotomy but the main problem is where to set the boundary between a positive and a negative peritoneal lavage. The manipulation of this boundary leads to significant changes in the sensitivity and specificity of the peritoneal lavage. Here we are presenting 162 consecutive cases of penetrating abdominal trauma and discussing our methods of evaluation and management.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed1986

Intramural haematoma of the duodenum following blunt abdominal injury--the place for conservative treatment.

Two patients with intramural haematoma of the duodenum following blunt abdominal injury are presented. They responded well to conservative treatment. Complete resolution of the duodenal obstruction was demonstrated by consecutive radiological studies. Because haematomas usually resolve spontaneously, awareness and diagnosis of this rare condition are important in order to prevent unnecessary operation.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed1979

[Treatment of peritonitis in abdominal injuries].

According to the author's data, peritonitis occurred in 250 (20.8%) out of 1200 cases of abdominal injuries, 69 of these 250 patients died (27.6%). The main means combating this complication was an early surgical intervention. A complex of postoperative therapeutic procedures, aimed at the prophylaxis and treatment of peritonitis in these patients, is described.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Antibiotic prophylaxis in trauma: penetrating abdominal injuries and open fractures.

Infection is an important cause of late morbidity and mortality following traumatic injury. As part of a coordinated treatment effort for the injured patient, preventive antibiotic use can reduce subsequent infectious complications. Available evidence supports the use of antibiotic(s) with activity against both aerobic and anaerobic enteric pathogens for patients with penetrating abdominal injuries and bowel penetration. Patients with open fractures benefit from the use of an antibiotic with activity against Staphylococcus aureus. Data on the ideal dose and duration of antibiotic administration in these situations are incomplete. It is likely that the best results will be obtained with early parenteral administration of large doses of the chosen antibiotic continuing for less than or equal to 24 hours. For injuries other than penetrating abdominal wounds and open fractures, definitive information is not available.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed1964

ABDOMINAL INJURIES.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2001

Abdominal injuries caused by bicycle handlebars.

OBJECTIVE: To find out whether the increase in the number of children admitted with injuries from mountain bicycle handlebars is attributed to recent changes in the design of children's bicycles. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Teaching general hospital, Israel. SUBJECTS: 76 children who presented with abdominal injuries caused by bicycle handlebars. RESULTS: In 12 of the 76 children, there was an imprint of the handlebar edge on the hypochondrium. The most common injuries were isolated ruptures of spleen or liver, (14 and 11 patients, respectively). Five of the 25 patients were operated on and the rest treated conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: Children with an imprint or bruise made by the handlebar edge on the abdominal wall, or who give a clear history of injuries by a bicycle handlebar should be treated with great care. BMX handlebars are relatively high (for young riders) and wide; they also turn freely and are therefore in direct line with the upper abdomen. Prohibiting the use of bicycles with unpadded handlebars may prevent some of these intra-abdominal injuries.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2002

[Emergency treatment of penetrating, combined thoracic- and abdominal injury. Pre-hospital i.v. fluid therapy].

We report the rare case of a penetrating, combined thoracic- and abdominal injury as a consequence of a farm work accident. During the recent years, a "treat and run" approach has been increasingly advocated as a time-saving way of treating penetrating injuries, constituting a compromise between the existing strategies of "scoop and run" (used mainly in the USA) and "stay and treat" (preferred in Central Europe). A prolonged rescue response time makes the treat and run approach impossible here. Immediate treatment at the accident site requires an appropriate provision of i.v. fluids. We examine the course of pre-hospital treatment of a trauma patient to illustrate the various approaches to i.v. fluid therapy in relation to rescue response time. However there are only a few studies with a real evidence. If "treat and run" is not possible, the outcome of patients with penetrating trauma can be influenced positively by moderate fluid therapy under continuous monitoring after having reached a constant, low mean arteria pressure (so called permissive hypotension).

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed1999

[Contrast media extravasation in upper abdominal injuries: detection with spiral computerized tomography].

PURPOSE: The possibility of detecting contrast agent extravasation (i.e., active hemorrhage) with dynamic conventional Computed Tomography (CT) in patients with abdominal trauma has already been reported in small series. We report our experience in the demonstration of contrast material extravasation using helical CT; we also investigate the diagnostic and clinical value of this finding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: January 1997 to July 1998, we examined 41 consecutive patients with upper abdominal trauma. Twelve patients (29%) had contrast material extravasation. The examinations were performed with a helical unit and volumetric acquisitions (thickness 8-10 mm, pitch 1, reconstruction interval 5-8 mm). The intravenous contrast medium (350 mgI/mL, 130-140 mL) was administered with rapid infusion (2-2.5 mL/s, 40-50 s acquisition delay from bolus starting) and using a power injector. We reviewed the CT studies and clinical records of these 12 patients. Contrast agent extravasation was considered present when this finding, not recognizable on plain scans, showed equal attenuation to or higher attenuation than the vessels within the same level. Moreover we assessed leak site, CT appearance, the direct visualization of the involved vessel, the evidence of other abdominal or extra-abdominal injuries, the CT signs of hypovolemic shock, clinical and surgical data. For comparison, we finally evaluated 50 examinations performed with a conventional CT scanner in subjects with abdominal trauma. RESULTS: Active hemorrhage involved the abdominal wall in 1 case (intercostal artery), the solid organs in 4 (splenic in 2, hepatic in 1, of the middle hepatic vein in 1), the peritoneal cavity in 3 (splenic, midcolic, and gastroduodenal artery in 1 each), the retroperitoneum in 4 (renal pedicle in 2, renal parenchyma in 1, lumbar artery in 1). In all cases the site of contrast extravasation corresponded at surgery to the site of active bleeding. The pattern was localized in 10 cases and diffuse in 2. The involved vessel could be identified in 5 cases while in the other ones the origin could be inferred from the leakage site. Associated injuries of upper abdominal organs were seen in 11 of 12 patients and extra-abdominal trauma in 6. In 4 cases there were CT features of hypovolemia. One patient died during transport to the operating room and another after surgery, while all the others survived. Contrast extravasation was identified in 9 (18%) of the patients examined with a conventional CT unit. CONCLUSIONS: Active contrast material extravasation can be recognized with conventional CT scanners, though it has been considered a rare finding. Helical CT seems to increase the detection rate and especially to boost the radiologist's confidence in this diagnosis. Though active bleeding is identified in severely-injured subjects requiring urgent intervention and may be associated with findings of hypovolemic shock, it should not be considered itself as a negative prognostic factor. Contrast extravasation is due to ongoing hemorrhage and its detection is critical for urgent treatment. Accurate anatomical location permits to choose surgical management or transcatheter embolization and thus decreases time consumption for precise bleeding site identification.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Lack of tachycardic response to hypotension in penetrating abdominal injuries.

Vital signs upon arrival to the emergency department were studied retrospectively in 59 consecutive patients with isolated penetrating abdominal injuries to determine their chronotropic response to hypotension. Forty-three patients with documented intraperitoneal injury were included in the study and separated into hypotensive and normotensive groups using a systolic blood pressure of 90 or 100 mm Hg. The difference in mean pulse rates between normotensive and hypotensive groups was not statistically significant (P greater than 0.05) although a wide range of pulse rates was noted in both groups. Nearly half of all hypotensive patients were not tachycardic, defined as a pulse rate less than 100. Similar findings were observed when the 117 sets of vital signs recorded both in the field and in the emergency department were analyzed as independent pieces of data. Several mechanisms are proposed for the lack of tachycardia in the presence of hypotension. This data suggest that tachycardia may not be a reliable sign of hypovolemic shock when defined by blood pressure criteria in these patients.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed1991

Base deficit as an indicator of significant abdominal injury.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative predictive value of the arterial base deficit (BD) as an indicator of intra-abdominal injury (AI) and to compare BD with other indicators (chest injuries, pelvic fractures) of AI. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control analysis. SETTING: University of California San Diego Medical Center. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Between January 1985 and July 1988, 3,223 blunt trauma patients were admitted, with complete records available on 3,011. Using a "best fit" multiple logistic regression, BD less than or equal to -6 was the single most important indicator of AI (P less than or equal to .0001), and the odds ratio for AI increased with each category of increasing severity of BD. Admission hypotension, major chest injury, pelvic fracture, and field hypotension (in odds ratio order) also were significantly associated with AI. CONCLUSION: BD is a powerful indicator of AI. A normal BD does not exclude AI, but the presence of a BD less than or equal to -6 in a blunt trauma patient should be considered a strong indication for objective evaluation of the abdomen (ie, diagnostic peritoneal lavage).

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed1990

[Grading and prognosis of blunt abdominal injuries].

From 1 January 1980 to 31 December 1987, 297 patients were admitted to Ullevål Hospital, Dept. of Surgery, with abdominal injury after blunt trauma. The Injury Severity Score (ISS) was determined in retrospect, and correlated to mortality, morbidity and use of resources. 50 patients (16.8%) died. Mortality increased with increasing ISS, until ISS was above 34. In this group, mortality was 75%. In the survivors, hospital costs (days in the hospital, in the intensive care unit, on mechanical respiration, and number of blood units transfused) increased with increasing ISS. The likelihood of developing septicaemia adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or multiple organ failure also increased with increasing ISS. Those who died were older and had a higher ISS than the survivors. In patients over 55 years old, the mortality increased significantly. The ISS is well suited for identification of seriously injured patients after blunt abdominal trauma. The ISS can be used to predict mortality, morbidity and cost of treatment in groups of patients.

Abdominal Injuries↗