Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “REPRESSION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Ikaros-CtIP interactions do not require C-terminal binding protein and participate in a deacetylase-independent mode of repression.

Ikaros and Aiolos are Kruppel zinc finger proteins that play key roles in hemo-lymphoid development and homeostasis. We have previously shown that they can repress transcription through the recruitment of histone deacetylases (HDACs). Here, we provide the first functional evidence that these proteins can also repress gene function in a manner that does not require deacetylase activity. This functionality can be attributed in part to Ikaros interactions with the HDAC-independent corepressor, C-terminal binding protein (CtBP). However, mutations that block Ikaros-CtBP interactions do not abolish Ikaros's repression activity, implicating the involvement of additional corepressors. Consistent with this expectation, we show that Ikaros can interact with a CtBP-interacting protein (CtIP), which has also been linked to a deacetylase-independent strategy of repression. Despite being a CtBP interactor, CtIP's association with Ikaros does not require CtBP but instead relies upon its Rb interaction domain. Significantly, Ikaros can interact with Rb, which itself can repress gene function in a deacetylase-independent manner. A mutation in Ikaros that abrogates CtIP interactions significantly reduces repression, and a double mutation that prevents interaction with both CtIP and CtBP even further alleviates repression. Finally, we show that CtIP and CtBP can interact with the general transcription factors, TATA binding protein and transcription factor IIB, which suggests a possible mechanism for their deacetylase-independent mode of repression.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2003

HoxA10 represses gene transcription in undifferentiated myeloid cells by interaction with histone deacetylase 2.

The homeodomain proteins, HoxA10 and Pbx1a, interact with negative cis elements to repress gene transcription in undifferentiated myeloid cells. The CYBB and NCF2 genes, which encode the gp91PHOX and p67PHOX proteins, are two such HoxA10-Pbx1a target genes. In previous studies, we found that HoxA10-Pbx1a represses transcription of these genes by two mechanisms: competition for DNA binding with transcriptional activators and endogenous repression activity. In these studies, we identify a novel molecular mechanism of endogenous transcriptional repression by HoxA10-Pbx1a. Endogenous repression activity of other Hox-Pbx1a complexes requires recruitment of transcriptional co-repressor proteins by Pbx1a. In contrast, our investigations have determined that HoxA10 has Pbx1a-independent endogenous repression activity. We find that this transcriptional repression activity is abrogated by histone deacetylase inhibitors, suggesting involvement of co-repressor proteins. Consistent with this, we identify HoxA10 amino acids 224-249 as a Pbx1-independent repression domain, which interacts with histone deacetylase 2. We have determined that this HoxA10 domain is not conserved with other Abd Hox proteins, although homology exists with other transcription factors and co-repressors. Understanding the roles different Hox proteins play in myeloid differentiation is a challenging problem. Our results suggest that insight into this problem can be obtained from biochemical characterization of the various molecular mechanisms of Hox protein function.

Blotting, Northern↗
PubMed2003

A hexose transporter homologue controls glucose repression in the methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha.

Peroxisome biogenesis and synthesis of peroxisomal enzymes in the methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha are under the strict control of glucose repression. We identified an H. polymorpha glucose catabolite repression gene (HpGCR1) that encodes a hexose transporter homologue. Deficiency in GCR1 leads to a pleiotropic phenotype that includes the constitutive presence of peroxisomes and peroxisomal enzymes in glucose-grown cells. Glucose transport and repression defects in a UV-induced gcr1-2 mutant were found to result from a missense point mutation that substitutes a serine residue (Ser(85)) with a phenylalanine in the second predicted transmembrane segment of the Gcr1 protein. In addition to glucose, mannose and trehalose fail to repress the peroxisomal enzyme, alcohol oxidase in gcr1-2 cells. A mutant deleted for the GCR1 gene was additionally deficient in fructose repression. Ethanol, sucrose, and maltose continue to repress peroxisomes and peroxisomal enzymes normally and therefore, appear to have GCR1-independent repression mechanisms in H. polymorpha. Among proteins of the hexose transporter family of baker's yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the amino acid sequence of the H. polymorpha Gcr1 protein shares the highest similarity with a core region of Snf3p, a putative high affinity glucose sensor. Certain features of the phenotype exhibited by gcr1 mutants suggest a regulatory role for Gcr1p in a repression pathway, along with involvement in hexose transport.

Alcohol Oxidoreductases↗
PubMed2004

The Reg1-interacting proteins, Bmh1, Bmh2, Ssb1, and Ssb2, have roles in maintaining glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a type 1 protein phosphatase complex composed of the Glc7 catalytic subunit and the Reg1 regulatory subunit represses expression of many glucose-regulated genes. Here we show that the Reg1-interacting proteins Bmh1, Bmh2, Ssb1, and Ssb2 have roles in glucose repression. Deleting both BMH genes causes partially constitutive ADH2 expression without significantly increasing the level of Adr1 protein, the major activator of ADH2 expression. Adr1 and Bcy1, the regulatory subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase, are both required for this effect indicating that constitutive expression in Deltabmh1Deltabmh2 cells uses the same activation pathway that operates in Deltareg1 cells. Deletion of both BMH genes and REG1 causes a synergistic relief from repression, suggesting that Bmh proteins also act independently of Reg1 during glucose repression. A two-hybrid interaction with the Bmh proteins was mapped to amino acids 187-232, a region of Reg1 that is conserved in different classes of fungi. Deleting this region partially releases SUC2 from glucose repression. This indicates a role for the Reg1-Bmh interaction in glucose repression and also suggests a broad role for Bmh proteins in this process. An in vivo Reg1-Bmh interaction was confirmed by copurification of Bmh proteins with HA(3)-TAP-tagged Reg1. The nonconventional heat shock proteins Ssb1 and Ssb2 are also copurified with HA(3)-TAP-tagged Reg1. Deletion of both SSB genes modestly decreases repression of ADH2 expression in the presence of glucose, suggesting that Ssb proteins, perhaps through their interaction with Reg1, play a minor role in glucose repression.

14-3-3 Proteins↗
PubMed2005

SIRT1 deacetylation and repression of p300 involves lysine residues 1020/1024 within the cell cycle regulatory domain 1.

The SIR2 family of nicotinamide adenosine dinucleotide (NAD)-dependent deacetylases modulates diverse biological functions in different species, including longevity, apoptosis, cell cycle exit, and cellular differentiation. SIRT1, the closest mammalian ortholog of the yeast SIR2 (silent information regulator 2) gene, represses several transcription factors, including p53, NFkappaB and forkhead proteins. The p300 protein serves as a rate-limiting transcriptional cointegrator of diverse transcription factors either to activate or to repress transcription through modular subdomains. Herein, SIRT1 physically interacted with and repressed p300 transactivation, requiring the NAD-dependent deacetylase activity of SIRT1. SIRT1 repression involved the CRD1 transcriptional repression domain of p300. Two residues within the CRD1 domain (Lys-1020 and Lys-1024) were required for SIRT1 repression and served as substrates for SIRT1 deacetylation. These residues also serve as acceptor lysines for modification by the ubiquitin-like SUMO protein. The SUMO-specific protease SSP3 relieved SIRT1 repression of p300. SSP3 antagonism of SIRT1 required the SUMO-deconjugating function of SSP3. Thus, p300 serves as a deacetylase substrate for SIRT1 through a conserved SUMO consensus motif. Because p300 is a limiting transcriptional cofactor, deacetylation and repression of p300 by SIRT1 may serve an important integration point during metabolism and cellular differentiation.

Amino Acid Motifs↗
PubMed2004

Human THAP7 is a chromatin-associated, histone tail-binding protein that represses transcription via recruitment of HDAC3 and nuclear hormone receptor corepressor.

The identities of signal transducer proteins that integrate histone hypoacetylation and transcriptional repression are largely unknown. Here we demonstrate that THAP7, an uncharacterized member of the recently identified THAP (Thanatos-associated protein) family of proteins, is ubiquitously expressed, associates with chromatin, and represses transcription. THAP7 binds preferentially to hypoacetylated (un-, mono-, and diacetylated) histone H4 tails in vitro via its C-terminal 77 amino acids. Deletion of this domain, or treatment of cells with the histone deacetylase inhibitor TSA, which leads to histone hyperacetylation, partially disrupts THAP7/chromatin association in living cells. THAP7 coimmunoprecipitates with histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) and the nuclear hormone receptor corepressor (NCoR) and represses transcription as a Gal4 fusion protein. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays demonstrate that these corepressors are recruited to promoters in a THAP7 dependent manner and promote histone H3 hypoacetylation. The conserved THAP domain is a key determinant for full HDAC3 association in vitro, and both the THAP domain and the histone interaction domain are important for the repressive properties of THAP7. Full repression mediated by THAP7 is also dependent on NCoR expression. We hypothesize that THAP7 is a dual function repressor protein that actively targets deacetylation of histone H3 necessary to establish transcriptional repression and functions as a signal transducer of the repressive mark of hypoacetylated histone H4. This is the first demonstration of the transcriptional regulatory properties of a human THAP domain protein, and a critical identification of a potential transducer of the repressive signal of hypoacetylated histone H4 in higher eukaryotes.

Cell Line↗
PubMed2006

Identification of cell cycle regulatory genes as principal targets of p53-mediated transcriptional repression.

Historically, most studies attribute p53 function to the transactivation of target genes. That p53 can selectively repress genes to affect a cellular response is less widely appreciated. Available evidence suggests that repression is important for p53-induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. To better establish the scope of p53-repressed target genes and the cellular processes they may affect, a global expression profiling strategy was used to identify p53-responsive genes following adenoviral p53 gene transfer (Ad-p53) in PC3 prostate cancer cells. A total of 111 genes, 0.77% of the 14,500 genes represented on the Affymetrix U133A microarray, were repressed more than 2-fold (p < or = 0.05). Validation of the array data, using reverse transcription-PCR of 20 randomly selected genes, yielded a confirmation rate of >95.5% for the complete data set. Functional over-representation analysis revealed that cell cycle regulatory genes exhibited a highly significant enrichment (p < or = 5 x 10(-28)) within the transrepressed targets. 41% of the repressed targets are cell cycle regulators. A subset of these genes exhibited repression following DNA damage, preceding cell cycle arrest, in LNCaP cells. The use of a p53 small interfering RNA strategy in LNCaP cells and the use of p53-null cell lines demonstrated that this repression is p53-dependent. These findings identify a set of genes not known previously to be down-regulated by p53 and indicate that p53-induced cell cycle arrest is a function of not only the transactivation of cell cycle inhibitors (e.g. p21) but also the repression of targets that regulate proliferation at several distinct phases of the cell cycle.

Adenoviridae↗
PubMed2006

SUMOylation of the corepressor N-CoR modulates its capacity to repress transcription.

In the absence of ligands the corepressor N-CoR mediates transcriptional repression by some nuclear hormone receptors. Several protein-protein interactions of N-CoR are known, of which mainly complex formation with histone deacetylases (HDACs) leads to the repression of target genes. On the other hand, the role of posttranslational modifications in corepressor function is not well established. Here, we show that N-CoR is modified by Sumo-1. We found SUMO-E2-conjugating enzyme Ubc9 and SUMO-E3 ligase Pias1 as novel N-CoR interaction partners. The SANT1 domain of N-CoR was found to mediate this interaction. We show that K152, K1117, and K1330 of N-CoR can be conjugated to SUMO and that mutation of all sites is necessary to fully block SUMOylation in vitro. Because these lysine residues are located within repression domains I and III, respectively, we investigated a possible correlation between the functions of the repression domains and SUMOylation. Coexpression of Ubc9 protein resulted in enhanced N-CoR-dependent transcriptional repression. Studies using SUMOylation-deficient N-CoR RDI mutants suggest that SUMO modification contributes to repression by N-CoR. Mutation of K152 to R in RD1, for example, not only significantly reduced repression of a reporter gene, but also abolished the effect of Ubc9 on transcriptional repression.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2001

A specific lysine in c-Jun is required for transcriptional repression by E1A and is acetylated by p300.

The adenovirus E1A protein regulates transcription of cellular genes via its interaction with the transcriptional coactivators p300/CBP. The collagenase promoter activated by the c-Jun protein is repressed by E1A. Here we show that E1A repression is specific for c-Jun, as E1A does not repress the collagenase promoter activated by the homologous transcription factor EB1. Using chimeras of c-Jun and EB1, we demonstrate that a 12 amino acid region in the basic region of the c-Jun DNA-binding domain is essential for repression by E1A. Since repression requires the binding of p300 to E1A, we studied the involvement of p300 acetyltransferase activity in the repression mechanism. We demonstrate that c-Jun is acetylated in vivo, and mutational analysis identified Lys271 in the c-Jun basic region to be essential for repression of the collagenase promoter by E1A. In addition, Lys271 is acetylated both in vitro and in vivo. These results suggest that the specific repression of the collagenase promoter by E1A involves acetylation of c-Jun.

Acetylation↗
PubMed1993

Repression of hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster by individual naturally occurring P elements.

Individual P elements that were genetically isolated from wild-type strains were tested for their abilities to repress two aspects of hybrid dysgenesis: gonadal dysgenesis and mutability of a double-P element-insertion allele of the singed locus (snw). These elements were also characterized by Southern blotting, polymerase chain reaction amplification and DNA sequencing. Three of the elements were 1.1-kb KP elements, one was a 1.2-kb element called D50, and one was a 0.5-kb element called SP. These three types of elements could encode polypeptides of 207, 204, and 14 amino acids, respectively. Gonadal dysgenesis was repressed by two of the KP elements (denoted KP(1) and KP(6)) and by SP, but not by the third KP element (KP(D)), nor by D50. Repression of gonadal dysgenesis was mediated by a maternal effect, or by a combination of zygotic and maternal effects generated by the P elements themselves. The mutability of snw was repressed by the KP(1) and KP(6) elements, by D50 and by SP, but not by KP(D); however, the SP element repressed snw mutability only when the transposase came from complete P elements and the D50 element repressed it only when the transposase came from the modified P element known as delta 2-3. In all cases, repression of snw mutability appeared to be mediated by a zygotic effect of the isolated P element. Each of the isolated elements was also tested for its ability to suppress the phenotype of a P-insertion mutation of the vestigial locus (vg21-3). D50 was a moderate suppressor whereas SP and the three KP elements had little or no effect. These results indicate that each isolated P element had its own profile of repression and suppression abilities. It is suggested that these abilities may be mediated by P-encoded polypeptides or by antisense P RNAs initiated from external genomic promoters.

Alleles↗
PubMed1996

Transcriptional repression by p53 involves molecular interactions distinct from those with the TATA box binding protein.

In addition to serving a role as a DNA binding-dependent transcriptional activator, p53 has been reported to repress a variety of promoters that lack p53 binding sites. Data from recent studies have suggested that this activity is mediated via an interaction between p53 and the TATA box binding protein (TBP). To investigate the functional relevance of this interaction in vivo, we have performed transient transfection assays in Drosophila Schneider cells. Wild-type p53 was found to repress expression from TATA box- but not initiator (Inr)-containing promoters activated by GAL4-VP16, GAL4-ftzQ or Sp1. A mutant p53(His175), defective in DNA binding and transcriptional activation, also inhibited TATA-dependent transcription activated by Sp1. However, p53 was unable to repress a basal TATA promoter stimulated by overexpression of TBP. Furthermore, overexpression of TBP failed to rescue the p53-mediated repression of activated transcription and a p53 mutant with its N-terminal TBP interaction domain intact, but defective in transcriptional activation and binding to TBP-associated factors (TAFs), was similarly defective in transcriptional repression. These data suggest that a p53-TBP interaction is not sufficient for transcriptional repression by p53 and that repression involves an interaction between p53 and other factors, such as TAFs, that are required for activated but not basal transcription. We suggest that p53-mediated repression results from squelching of a factor limiting for activated transcription from TATA- but not Inr-containing promoters.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 represses LINE-1 expression and retrotransposition but not Alu transcription.

In order to explore the defense mechanism by which retrotransposons are repressed, we assessed the ability of methyl-CpG-binding protein 2, MeCP2, to influence LINE-1 (L1) and Alu transcription and, furthermore, L1 retrotransposition. In transient transfection assays, targeting of the transcriptional-repression domain (TRD) of MeCP2 (via a linked Gal4 DNA-binding domain) to the transcriptional start site of L1 promoter-driven reporter constructs efficiently repressed transcription. The Gal4-linked TRD of the related methyl-CpG-binding protein MBD1 also repressed transcription but not that of MBD2. Furthermore, full-length MeCP2 effectively repressed transcription of a HpaII-methylated L1 reporter. Secondly, we used a genetic assay employing a full-length neo-marked L1 reporter construct to study L1 retrotransposition. We found the Gal4-linked TRD of MeCP2 to repress effectively L1 retrotransposition when targeted to the retrotransposition reporter. Retrotransposition was also reduced in response to in vitro HpaII methylation of the reporter and was further decreased by co-expressed full-length MeCP2. In striking contrast expression of the Gal4-linked TRD of MeCP2 had no inhibiting effect on transcription of an AluSx reporter tagged with a 7S-upstream sequence. Furthermore, full-length MeCP2 abrogated the methylation-induced repression of this reporter. Our results indicate that MeCP2 serves a role in repression of L1 expression and retrotransposition but has no inhibiting effect on Alu transcription.

Alu Elements↗
PubMed2004

Promoter-binding and repression of PDGFRB by c-Myc are separable activities.

The c-Myc transcription factor represses the mRNA expression of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta gene (PDGFRB). Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, we show that c-Myc binds to the proximal promoter of the PDGFRB gene in proliferating rat fibroblasts. Interestingly, mutant c-Myc proteins that are unable to repress PDGFRB gene expression, c-Myc(dBR) and c-Myc(d106-143), are still able to bind to the promoter in vivo. Hence, promoter-binding and repression of PDGFRB by c-Myc are separable activities. We also show that Myc repression of PDGFRB is not dependent on previously described or known transactivator-binding regions, suggesting Myc may be recruited to the promoter by multiple or yet unidentified transcription factors. In the presence of intact promoter-binding by Myc, trichostatin A (TSA) can block Myc repression of PDGFRB in vivo, again demonstrating that promoter-binding and repression are separable. Taken together, we hypothesize that Myc repression of PDGFRB expression occurs by a multi-step mechanism in which repression is initiated after Myc is recruited to the promoter.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Repression of tonB transcription during anaerobic growth requires Fur binding at the promoter and a second factor binding upstream.

Although iron is an essential nutrient, its toxicity at high levels necessitates regulated transport. In Gram-negative bacteria a central target for regulation is the TonB protein, an energy transducer that couples the cytoplasmic membrane proton motive force to active transport of (FeIII)-siderophore complexes across the outer membrane. We have previously demonstrated the threefold repression of tonB transcription by excess iron in the presence of Fur repressor protein under aerobic conditions. In this report, we examine tonB regulation under anaerobic conditions where the solubility of iron is not a limiting factor and, presumably, siderophore-mediated transport is not required. Under these conditions, tonB transcription is repressed at least 10-fold by excess iron in the presence of Fur, but can be fully derepressed in the absence of Fur. Based on several lines of evidence, this anaerobic repression is not due to increased negative supercoiling as previously postulated. Our results rule out both supercoiling-mediated decreased promoter function and increased Fur binding as mediators of anaerobic repression. Under iron-limiting anaerobic conditions tonB expression is as high or higher than under iron-limiting aerobic conditions, suggesting that promoter function has not decreased anaerobically. Furthermore, under anaerobic conditions in tonB+ strains, tonB promoter function is insensitive to the gyrase inhibitor novobiocin and to changes in medium osmolarity and temperature, three conditions known to change levels of supercoiling. We also rule out effects of mutations in arcA or fnr as mediators of anaerobic repression. Results from in vivo dimethyl sulphate protection foot-printing indicate that Fur binds to an operator site between the -10 and -35 regions of the promoter, but not to a less homologous operator site centered at +26. The binding is, if anything, weaker under anaerobic conditions, indicating that anaerobic repression is not mediated through Fur. Additional changes in the in vivo footprint upstream from the promoter implicate a second factor in tonB anaerobic repression. Together, these results suggest that the mechanism responsible for this regulation (and, by analogy, that of other anaerobically repressed, iron-regulated genes such as cir, exbB, and fhuA) is a novel one.

Anaerobiosis↗
PubMed1994

Substrate induction and catabolite repression of the Streptomyces coelicolor glycerol operon are mediated through the GylR protein.

The pathway for glycerol catabolism in Streptomyces coelicolor is determined by the gylCABX operon, which is transcribed from two closely spaced glycerol-inducible, glucose-repressible promoters. Glucose (or catabolite) repression of gyl is known to be exerted by a general catabolite repression system in which the soluble glucose kinase plays a central role. The gylR gene is contained in a separate glycerol-inducible, weakly glucose-repressible transcription unit immediately upstream from the gyl operon. The role of gylR in the regulation of gyl transcription was assessed by introducing specific null mutations into the chromosomal gylR gene. Direct quantification of gyl transcripts from the gylR null mutants grown on different carbon sources demonstrated that GylR is the repressor of the gylCABX operon and also revealed that GylR functions as a negative autoregulator. Moreover, the transcriptional analysis revealed that the gylR null mutants were relieved of glucose repression of both gylCABX and gylR. We conclude that both substrate induction and catabolite repression of gyl are mediated through the GylR protein. This is the first direct evidence that catabolite repression in Streptomyces is not exerted at the transcriptional level by a general 'catabolite repressor protein'. Models for catabolite repression are discussed.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed2004

Salt-inducible kinase-1 represses cAMP response element-binding protein activity both in the nucleus and in the cytoplasm.

Salt-inducible kinase-1 (SIK1) is phosphorylated at Ser577 by protein kinase A in adrenocorticotropic hormone-stimulated Y1 cells, and the phospho-SIK1 translocates from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. The phospho-SIK1 is dephosphorylated in the cytoplasm and re-enters the nucleus several hours later. By using green-fluorescent protein-tagged SIK1 fragments, we found that a peptide region (586-612) was responsible for the nuclear localization of SIK1. The region was named the 'RK-rich region' because of its Arg- and Lys-rich nature. SIK1s mutated in the RK-rich region were localized mainly in the cytoplasm. Because SIK1 represses cAMP-response element (CRE)-mediated transcription of steroidogenic genes, the mutants were examined for their effect on transcription. To our surprise, the cytoplasmic mutants strongly repressed the CRE-binding protein (CREB) activity, the extent of repression being similar to that of SIK1(S577A), a mutant localized exclusively in the nucleus. Several chimeras were constructed from SIK1 and from its isoform SIK2, which was localized mainly in the cytoplasm, and they were examined for intracellular localization as well as CREB-repression activity. A SIK1-derived chimera, where the RK-rich region had been replaced with the corresponding region of SIK2, was found in the cytoplasm, its CREB-modulating activity being similar to that of wild-type SIK1. On the other hand, a SIK2-derived chimera with the RK-rich region of SIK1 was localized in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm, and had a CREB-repressing activity similar to that of the wild-type SIK2. Green fluorescent protein-fused transducer of regulated CREB activity 2 (TORC2), a CREB-specific co-activator, was localized in the cytoplasm and nucleus of Y1 cells, and, after treatment with adrenocorticotropic hormone, cytoplasmic TORC2 entered the nucleus, activating CREB. The SIK1 mutants, having a strong CRE-repressing activity, completely inhibited the adrenocorticotropic hormone-induced nuclear entry of green fluorescent protein-fused TORC2. This suggests that SIK1 may regulate the intracellular movement of TORC2, and as a result modulates the CREB-dependent transcription activity. Together, these results indicate that the RK-rich region of SIK1 is important for determining the nuclear localization and attenuating CREB-repressing activity, but the degree of the nuclear localization of SIK1 itself does not necessarily reflect the degree of SIK1-mediated CREB repression.

3T3-L1 Cells↗
PubMed2005

Combinatorial repression of the hypoxic genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by DNA binding proteins Rox1 and Mot3.

The hypoxic genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are transcriptionally repressed during aerobic growth through recruitment of the Ssn6/Tup1 general repression complex by the DNA binding protein Rox1. A second DNA binding protein Mot3 enhances repression of some hypoxic genes. Previous studies characterized the role of Mot3 at the hypoxic ANB1 gene as promoting synergy among one Mot3 site and two Rox1 sites comprising operator A of that gene. Here we studied the role of Mot3 in enhancing repression by Rox1 at another hypoxic gene, HEM13, which is less strongly regulated than ANB1 and has a very different arrangement of Rox1 and Mot3 binding sites. By assessing the effects of deleting Rox1 and Mot3 sites individually and in combination, we found that the major repression of HEM13 occurred through three Mot3 sites closely spaced with a single Rox1 site. While the Mot3 sites functioned additively, they enhanced repression by the single Rox1 site, and the presence of Rox1 enhanced the additive effects of the Mot3 sites. In addition, using a Rox1-Ssn6 fusion protein, we demonstrated that Mot3 enhances Rox1 repression through helping recruit the Ssn6/Tup1 complex. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays indicated that Rox1 stabilized Mot3 binding to DNA. Integrating these results, we were able to devise a set of rules that govern the combinatorial interactions between Rox1 and Mot3 to achieve differential repression.

Binding Sites↗
PubMed1971

ColB2-K77, a fertility-repressed F-like factor.

The colicinogenic B factor, transferred from Escherichia coli strain K77 (and termed ColB2-K77 or ColB2) to an E. coli K12 F(-) strain, is capable of promoting its own transfer to other K12 F(-) strains at a low rate (from LFC cultures) which can be increased under special conditions (HFC cultures). LFC cultures of K12 (ColB2)(+) F(-) strains show a low level of adsorption of F-specific phage particles which also increases under HFC conditions. The ColB2 factor is thus inferred to be an F-like sex factor which is repressed in its fertility. This repression is concluded to be due to a cytoplasmic repressor since, when ColB2 is present in cells containing an F factor (either autonomous or integrated), F fertility is also repressed as shown by the inability of such (ColB2)(+)F(+) [or (ColB2)(+)Hfr] strains to plaque F-specific phages, and by a reduction in the level of chromosomal transfer from such strains, compared to the corresponding F(+) (or Hfr) control strains. Mutants of the ColB2 factor in which fertility is no longer repressed (fertility derepressed or Fdr mutants) have been isolated. The ColB2Fdr mutant strains do not appear to be able to mobilize chromosomal transfer, although they have acquired F-specific phage sensitivity demonstrable by plaque formation and they transfer their colicin factor at high frequency and are well piliated. The Fdr mutation is presumed to result in the inability to synthesize the cytoplasmic fertility repressor since the ColB2Fdr factor does not repress the fertility of an F factor when present in the same host strain. A fertility-repressed drug resistance factor of the R(f) type is not stable in the presence of a ColB2 factor in the same cell and is eliminated in about 10% of the cells per generation. In contrast, another factor characteristic of the R(i) type is fully compatible with ColB2. Under conditions artificially stabilizing (ColB2Fdr)(+) (Rf)(+) strains, the enhanced fertility of ColB2Fdr is not repressed by the presence of the R factor, nor does the presence of R(f) in the intermediate strain of an HFC (for ColB2) system inhibit the normal increase in ColB2 transmissibility. It is concluded that the repressors of R(f) and ColB2, although both active on F fertility, are different; this may indicate that at least two independently repressible cistrons are involved in the expression of fertility characteristics.

Adsorption↗