Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Propofol”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources

Propofol decreases the clearance of midazolam by inhibiting CYP3A4: an in vivo and in vitro study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of propofol on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam in vivo and to elucidate the mechanism of the pharmacokinetic changes of midazolam by propofol with the use of human liver microsomes and recombinant CYP3A4. METHODS: In an in vivo, double-blind randomized study, 24 patients received 0.2 mg/kg midazolam and either 2 mg/kg propofol (propofol group) or placebo (placebo group) for induction of anesthesia. In the propofol group, continuous infusion of propofol at 9 mg/kg/h was started immediately after the bolus infusion of propofol and was maintained for an hour. In the placebo group the same dose of soybean emulsion as a placebo was given and infused intravenously for an hour instead of propofol. In an in vitro study the effect of propofol on the metabolism of midazolam was studied with human liver microsomes and recombinant CYP3A4. RESULTS: In the propofol group the mean clearance of midazolam was decreased by 37% (P = .005) and the mean elimination half-life was prolonged by 61% (P = .04) compared with the placebo group. The mean plasma concentrations of 1'-hydroxymidazolam were lower in the propofol group than in the placebo group at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 minutes after midazolam was administered (P < .05). The mean (+/-SD) Michaelis-Menten constant for midazolam 1'-hydroxylation by human liver microsomes was 5.6 +/- 3.3 micromol/L. The formation of 1'-hydroxymidazolam was competitively inhibited by propofol, and the mean inhibition constant was 56.7 +/- 16.6 micromol/L. The mean Michaelis-Menten constant and mean inhibition constant values for midazolam 1'-hydroxylation by recombinant CYP3A4 were 4.0 micromol/L and 61.0 micromol/L, respectively, consistent with the mean values obtained from human liver microsomes. CONCLUSION: Propofol decreases the clearance of midazolam, and the possible mechanism is the competitive inhibition of hepatic CYP3A4.

Adult↗

The effects of propofol on the contractility of failing and nonfailing human heart muscles.

We determined the direct effects of propofol on the contractility of human nonfailing atrial and failing atrial and ventricular muscles. Atrial and ventricular trabecular muscles were obtained from the failing human hearts of transplant patients or from nonfailing hearts of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Isometric contraction variables were recorded before and after propofol was added to the bath in concentrations between 0.056 and 560 microM. The effects of propofol were compared with its commercial vehicle intralipid. To test beta-adrenergic effects in the presence of propofol, 1 microM isoproterenol was added at the end of each experiment. To determine the cellular mechanisms responsible for the actions of propofol, we examined its effects on actomyosin ATPase activity and sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) uptake in nonfailing atrial tissues. Propofol caused a concentration-dependent decrease in maximal developed tension in all muscles, which became significant (P < 0.05) at concentrations exceeding the clinical range (> or =56 microM). Isoproterenol restored contractility to the level achieved before exposure to propofol (P > 0.05 compared with baseline). Failing ventricular muscle exposed to propofol exhibited somewhat diminished ability to recover contractility in response to isoproterenol (P < 0.05 versus failing muscle exposed to intralipid only). Propofol induced a concentration-dependent decrease in the uptake of Ca(2+) into SR vesicles. At the same time, in the presence of 56 microM propofol, the Ca(2+)-activated actomyosin ATPase activity was shifted leftward, demonstrating an increase in myofilament sensitivity to Ca(2+). We conclude that propofol exerts a direct negative inotropic effect in nonfailing and failing human myocardium, but only at concentrations larger than typical clinical concentrations. Negative inotropic effects are reversible with beta-adrenergic stimulation. The negative inotropic effect of propofol is at least partially mediated by decreased Ca(2+) uptake into the SR; however, the net effect of propofol on contractility is insignificant at clinical concentrations because of a simultaneous increase in the sensitivity of the myofilaments to activator Ca(2+).

Aged↗

Early pregnancy does not reduce the C(50) of propofol for loss of consciousness.

UNLABELLED: Requirements for inhaled anesthetics decrease during pregnancy. There are no published data, however, regarding propofol requirements in these patients. Because propofol is often used for induction of general anesthesia when surgery is necessary in early pregnancy, we investigated whether early pregnancy reduces the requirement of propofol for loss of consciousness using a computer-assisted target-controlled infusion (TCI). Propofol was administered using TCI to provide stable concentrations and to allow equilibration between blood and effect-site (central compartment) concentrations. Randomly selected target concentrations of propofol (1.5-4.5 microg/mL) were administered to both pregnant women (n = 36) who were scheduled for pregnancy termination and nonpregnant women (n = 36) who were scheduled for elective orthopedic or otorhinolaryngologic surgery. The median gestation of the pregnant women was 8 wk (range, 6-12 wk). Venous blood samples for analysis of the serum propofol concentration were taken at 3 min and 8 min after equilibration of the propofol concentration. After a 10-min equilibration period of the predetermined propofol blood concentration, a verbal command to open their eyes was given to the patients twice, accompanied by rubbing of their shoulders. Serum propofol concentrations at which 50% of the patients did not respond to verbal commands (C(50) for loss of consciousness) were determined by logistic regression. There was no significant difference in C(50) +/- SE of propofol for loss of consciousness between the Nonpregnant (2.1 +/- 0.2 microg/mL) and Pregnant (2.0 +/- 0.2 microg/mL) groups. These results indicate that early pregnancy does not decrease the concentration of propofol required for loss of consciousness. IMPLICATIONS: The C(50) of propofol for loss of consciousness in early pregnancy did not differ from that in nonpregnant women, indicating that there is no need to decrease the propofol concentration for loss of consciousness when inducing general anesthesia for termination of pregnancy.

Abortion, Induced↗

Mechanism of the negative inotropic effect of propofol in isolated ferret ventricular myocardium.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate propofol's effect on myocardial contractility and relaxation and examine its underlying mechanism of action in isolated ferret ventricular myocardium. METHODS: The effects of propofol on variables of contractility and relaxation and on the free intracellular Ca++ transient detected with the Ca(++)-regulated photoprotein aequorin were analyzed. Propofol's effects were evaluated in a preparation in which the sarcoplasmic reticulum function was impaired by ryanodine. The effects of propofol's solvent, intralipid, on myocardial contractility, relaxation, and the intracellular Ca++ transient also were examined. RESULTS: Propofol, at concentrations of 10 microM or greater, decreased contractility and, at concentrations of 30 of microns or greater, decreased the amplitude of the intracellular Ca++ transient. At equal peak force, control peak aequorin luminescence in [Ca++]o = 2.25 mM and peak aequorin luminescence in 300 microM [Ca++]o = 2.25 mM and peak aequorin luminescence in 300 microM propofol in [Ca++]o > 2.25 mM did not differ, which suggests that propofol does not alter myofibrillar Ca++ sensitivity. After inactivation of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca++ release with 1 microM ryanodine, a condition in which myofibrillar activation depends almost exclusively on transsarcolemmal Ca++ influx, propofol caused a decrease in contractility and in the amplitude of the intracellular Ca++ transient. Under these conditions, propofol's relative negative inotropic effect did not differ from that in control muscles not exposed to ryanodine. Propofol's solvent, 10% intralipid, exerted a modest positive inotropic effect in this preparation. The intracellular Ca++ transient was unchanged by intralipid. Neither propofol nor intralipid altered the load sensitivity of relaxation. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the negative inotropic effect of propofol results from a decrease in intracellular Ca++ availability with no changes in myofibrillar Ca++ sensitivity. At least part of propofol's action is attributable to inhibition of transsarcolemmal Ca++ influx.

Animals↗

Effects of propofol on Ca2+ regulation by malignant hyperthermia-susceptible muscle membranes.

BACKGROUND: The effects of inhalation anesthetics on Ca2+ regulation in malignant hyperthermia-susceptible skeletal muscle are considered to be responsible for triggering malignant hyperthermia. The intravenous anesthetic propofol does not trigger malignant hyperthermia in susceptible patients or experimental animals, suggesting that there are important differences between the effects of propofol and the effects of inhalation anesthetics on Ca2+ regulation in malignant hyperthermia-susceptible muscle. Understanding these differences may help to clarify the mechanisms responsible for triggering malignant hyperthermia. METHODS: To investigate the effects of propofol on Ca2+ regulation by malignant hyperthermia-susceptible skeletal muscle, we determined its effects on the membrane channels and pumps that control myoplasmic Ca2+ concentrations: the sarcoplasmic reticulum ryanodine receptor, the transverse tubule dihydropyridine receptor, and the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-adenosine triphosphatase (Ca(2+)-ATPase). Terminal cisternae-derived sarcoplasmic reticulum vesicles enriched in the junctional proteins of the sarcoplasmic reticulum and the transverse tubule membranes were isolated from the muscle of malignant hyperthermia-susceptible and normal pigs. Ca2+ flux, Ca(2+)-ATPase, and ligand binding measurements on these isolated vesicle preparations were performed in the presence of varying propofol concentrations. RESULTS: Propofol (10-500 microM) had no effect on ryanodine receptor-mediated Ca2+ efflux from muscle membrane vesicles. Propofol (1-100 microM) also had no effect on sarcoplasmic reticulum vesicle [3H]ryanodine binding, whereas higher concentrations (200-300 microM) slightly inhibited [3H]ryanodine binding. Binding of the dihydropyridine receptor Ca2+ channel blocker [3H]PN200-110 to these preparations was inhibited by propofol (10-300 microM). Ca(2+)-ATPase activity was stimulated by 10-100 microM propofol but was inhibited by higher concentrations. In all cases, the effects of propofol on malignant hyperthermia-susceptible and normal membrane preparations were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to malignant hyperthermia-triggering inhalation anesthetics, propofol does not stimulate malignant hyperthermia-susceptible or normal ryanodine receptor channel activity, even at > 100 times clinical concentrations. Effects on dihydropyridine receptor and Ca(2+)-ATPase function, however, are similar to the effects of inhalation anesthestics and require much lower concentrations of propofol. These findings, demonstrating that propofol does not activate ryanodine receptor Ca2+ channels, suggest a plausible explanation for why propofol does not trigger malignant hyperthermia in susceptible persons.

Animals↗

Propofol inhibits cardiac L-type calcium current in guinea pig ventricular myocytes.

BACKGROUND: Propofol may exert negative inotropic and chronotropic actions in the heart. Single-channel studies show that propofol affects the kinetics of opening and closing of cardiac L-type calcium channels (ICa(L)) without altering channel conductance. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanisms of depressant effects of propofol on cardiac whole-cell ICa(L). METHODS: Single ventricular myocytes were freshly dissciated from guinea pig hearts using enzymatic isolation. One-suction electrode voltage-clamp technique (whole-cell mode) was used. LCa(L) was separated from other contaminated ionic currents. Propofol was applied in the commercial 10% Intralipid emulsion formula (Zeneca, UK). RESULTS: In isolated cardiomyocytes, propofol significantly inhibited whole-cell ICa(L) in a concentration-dependent manner (K D = 52.0 microM; Hill coefficient = 1.3). The solvent (Intralipid) did not affect ICa(L). Propofol decreased ICa(L) at all potentials tested along the voltage axis and reduced the slope conductance. The threshold potential for activation and the peak potential of the current-voltage relationship were not changed by propofol. The steady-state activation curves overlapped in the absence and the presence of 56 microM propofol. In contrast, the steady-state inactivation curve was shifted in the hyperpolarizing direction. The time course of the recovery from inactivation was delayed by 56 microM propofol. The blocking action on ICa(L) of propofol shows marked resting block and use-dependent block. Propofol caused more pronounced inhibition at a higher stimulation frequency. The effect of propofol on the inactivation process was even more clear on ICa(L). CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude tha propofol, at supratherapeutic concentrations, inhibits cardiac ICa(L). This inhibition is mainly due to a shift of inactivation curve and a reduction in slope conductance.

Anesthetics, Intravenous↗

In vivo and in vitro studies of the inhibitory effect of propofol on human platelet aggregation.

BACKGROUND: The inhibitory effects of propofol on platelet aggregation are controversial because the fat emulsion used as the solvent for propofol may affect platelet function. The effects of propofol on platelet intracellular calcium ion concentration and on aggregation were investigated. METHODS: Platelet aggregation was measured in 10 patients who received an intravenous infusion of propofol. Intralipos, the propofol solvent, was infused in 10 healthy volunteers and platelet aggregation were measured. The in vitro effects of propofol and Intralipos on platelets were also investigated. The inhibitory effects of various concentrations of propofol were studied. The effects of propofol on the changes in intracellular calcium level using a fluorescent dye, fura-2, were also observed. Template bleeding time was measured to determine the effect of propofol in clinical use. RESULTS: Platelet aggregation was significantly inhibited by infusion of propofol, although bleeding time was not prolonged. Intralipos did not inhibit platelets either in vivo or in vitro. Propofol significantly inhibited platelet aggregation in vitro and at 5.81 +/- 2.73 microg/ml but not at 2.08 +/- 1.14 microg/ml. The increase of intracellular calcium concentration was inhibited both in influx and discharge of calcium. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol inhibited platelet aggregation both in vivo and in vitro. Inhibition of platelet aggregation appeared to be caused by propofol itself and not by the fat emulsion. This inhibitory effect was also supported by the suppressed influx and discharge of calcium. No change in the bleeding time suggests that this inhibitory effect does not impair hemostasis clinically.

Adult↗

Automated responsiveness test (ART) predicts loss of consciousness and adverse physiologic responses during propofol conscious sedation.

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated a device designed to provide conscious sedation with propofol (propofol-air), or propofol combined with 50% nitrous oxide (N2O; propofol-N2O). An element of this device is the automated responsiveness test (ART), a method for confirming that patients remain conscious. The authors tested the hypotheses that the ART predicts loss of consciousness and that failure to respond to the ART precedes sedation-induced respiratory or hemodynamic toxicity. METHODS: The protocol consisted of sequential 15-min cycles in 20 volunteers. After a 15-min control period, propofol was infused to an initial target effect-site concentration of 0.0 microg/ml with N2O or 1.5 microg/ml with air. Subsequently, the propofol target effect-site concentration was increased by a designated increment (0.25 and 0.5 microg/ml) and the process repeated. This sequence was continued until loss of consciousness, as defined by an Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) score of 10/20 or less, or until an adverse physiologic event was detected. RESULTS: The OAA/S score at which only 50% of the volunteers were able to respond to the ART (P50) during propofol-N2O was 11.1 of 20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.6-11.8); the analogous P50 was 11.8 of 20 (95% CI: 11.4-12.3) with propofol-air. Failure to respond to the ART occurred at a plasma propofol concentration of 0.7 +/- 0.6 microg/ml with propofol-N2O and 1.6 +/- 0.6 microg/ml with propofol-air, whereas loss of consciousness occurred at 1.2 +/- 0.8 microg/ml and 1.9 +/- 0.7 microg/ml, respectively. There were no false-normal ART responses. CONCLUSION: The ART can guide individual titration of propofol because failure to respond to responsiveness testing precedes loss of consciousness and is not susceptible to false-normal responses. The use of N2O with propofol for conscious sedation decreases the predictive accuracy of the ART.

Adult↗

Propofol attenuates diaphragmatic dysfunction induced by septic peritonitis in hamsters.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis or peritonitis impairs diaphragmatic contractility and endurance capacity. Peroxynitrite, a powerful oxidant formed by superoxide and nitric oxide, has been implicated in the pathogenesis. Propofol scavenges this reactive molecule. The authors conducted the current study to evaluate whether propofol prevents diaphragmatic dysfunction induced by septic peritonitis. METHODS: Forty male Golden-Syrian hamsters (120-140 g) were randomly classified into five groups. Groups sham and sham-propofol 50 underwent sham laparotomy alone, whereas groups sepsis, sepsis-propofol 25, and sepsis-propofol 50 underwent cecal ligation with puncture. Groups sham and sepsis received infusion of intralipid, whereas groups sham-propofol 50, sepsis-propofol 25, and sepsis-propofol 50 received propofol at rates of 50, 25, and 50 mg.kg(-1).h(-1), respectively. Intralipid or propofol was subcutaneously infused from 3 h before surgery until 24 h after operation, when all hamsters were killed. Diaphragmatic contractility and fatigability were assessed in vitro using diaphragm muscle strips. Peroxynitrite formation in the diaphragm was assessed by nitrotyrosine immunostaining. Plasma nitrite-nitrate concentrations and diaphragmatic concentrations of malondialdehyde were determined. Using another set of animals, diaphragmatic inducible nitric oxide synthase activity was also measured. RESULTS: Twitch, tetanic tensions, and tensions during fatigue trials were reduced in group sepsis compared with group sham. In group SEPSIS, diaphragm malondialdehyde and inducible nitric oxide synthase activity, and plasma nitrite-nitrate concentrations increased, and positive immunostaining for nitrotyrosine residues was found. Propofol attenuated these changes. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with propofol attenuated diaphragmatic dysfunction induced by septic peritonitis in hamsters assessed by contractile profiles and endurance capacity. This beneficial effect of propofol may be caused, in part, by inhibition of lipid peroxidation in the diaphragm caused by the powerful oxidant.

Animals↗

Effects of sevoflurane, propofol, and adjunct nitrous oxide on regional cerebral blood flow, oxygen consumption, and blood volume in humans.

BACKGROUND: Anesthetic agents, especially volatile anesthetics and nitrous oxide (N2O), are suspected to perturb cerebral homeostasis and vascular reactivity. The authors quantified the effects of sevoflurane and propofol as sole anesthetics and in combination with N2O on regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF), metabolic rate of oxygen (rCMRO2), and blood volume (rCBV) in the living human brain using positron emission tomography. METHODS: 15O-labeled water, oxygen, and carbon monoxide were used as positron emission tomography tracers to determine rCBF, rCMRO2 and rCBV, respectively, in eight healthy male subjects during the awake state (baseline) and at four different anesthetic regimens: (1) sevoflurane alone, (2) sevoflurane plus 70% N2O (S+N), (3) propofol alone, and (4) propofol plus 70% N2O (P+N). Sevoflurane and propofol were titrated to keep a constant hypnotic depth (Bispectral Index 40) throughout anesthesia. End-tidal carbon dioxide was strictly kept at preinduction level. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane was 1.5 +/- 0.3% during sevoflurane alone and 1.2 +/- 0.3% during S+N (P < 0.001). The measured propofol concentration was 3.7 +/- 0.7 microg/ml during propofol alone and 3.5 +/- 0.7 microg/ml during P+N (not significant). Sevoflurane alone decreased rCBF in some (to 73-80% of baseline, P < 0.01), and propofol in all brain structures (to 53-70%, P < 0.001). Only propofol reduced also rCBV (in the cortex and cerebellum to 83-86% of baseline, P < 0.05). Both sevoflurane and propofol similarly reduced rCMRO2 in all brain areas to 56-70% and 50-68% of baseline, respectively (P < 0.05). The adjunct N2O counteracted some of the rCMRO2 and rCBF reductions caused by drugs alone, and especially during S+N, a widespread reduction (P < 0.05 for all cortex and cerebellum vs. awake) in the oxygen extraction fraction was seen. Adding of N2O did not alter the rCBV effects of sevoflurane and propofol alone. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol reduced rCBF and rCMRO2 comparably. Sevoflurane reduced rCBF less than propofol but rCMRO2 to an extent similar to propofol. These reductions in flow and metabolism were partly attenuated by adjunct N2O. S+N especially reduced the oxygen extraction fraction, suggesting disturbed flow-activity coupling in humans at a moderate depth of anesthesia.

Adult↗

Mixed-effects modeling of the intrinsic ventilatory depressant potency of propofol in the non-steady state.

BACKGROUND: Despite the ubiquitous use of propofol for anesthesia and conscious sedation and numerous publications about its effect, a pharmacodynamic model for propofol-induced ventilatory depression in the non-steady state has not been described. To investigate propofol-induced ventilatory depression in the clinically important range (at and below the metabolic hyperbola while carbon dioxide is accumulating because of drug-induced ventilatory depression), the authors applied indirect effect modeling to Paco2 data at a fraction of inspired carbon dioxide of 0 during and after administration of propofol. METHODS: Ten volunteers underwent determination of their carbon dioxide responsiveness by a rebreathing design. The parameters of a power function were fitted to the end-expiratory carbon dioxide and minute ventilation data. The volunteers then received propofol in a stepwise ascending pattern with use of a target-controlled infusion pump until significant ventilatory depression occurred (end-tidal pressure of carbon dioxide > 65 mmHg and/or imminent apnea). Thereafter, the concentration was reduced to 1 microg/ml. Propofol pharmacokinetics and the Paco2 were determined from frequent arterial blood samples. An indirect response model with Bayesian estimates of the pharmacokinetics and carbon dioxide responsiveness in the absence of drug was used to describe the Paco2 time course. Because propofol reduces oxygen requirements and carbon dioxide production, a correction factor for propofol-induced decreasing of carbon dioxide production was included. RESULTS: The following pharmacodynamic parameters were found to describe the time course of hypercapnia after administration of propofol (population mean and interindividual variability expressed as coefficients of variation): F (gain of the carbon dioxide response), 4.37 +/- 36.7%; ke0, CO2, 0.95 min-1 +/- 59.8%; baseline Paco2, 40.9 mmHg +/- 12.8%; baseline minute ventilation, 6.45 l/min +/- 36.3%; kel, CO2, 0.11 min-1 +/- 34.2%; C50,propofol, 1.33 microg/ml +/- 49.6%; gamma, 1.68 +/- 21.3%. CONCLUSION: Propofol at common clinical concentrations is a potent ventilatory depressant. An indirect response model accurately described the magnitude and time course of propofol-induced ventilatory depression. The indirect response model can be used to optimize propofol administration to reduce the risk of significant ventilatory depression.

Adult↗

Effect of a 0.5% dilution of propofol on pain on injection during induction of anesthesia in children.

BACKGROUND: Pain on injection of propofol in children has been reported to be as high as 30-80%. The reason for the pain is assumed to be the aqueous phase of the propofol emulsion. Therefore, for the first time, this study tested the hypothesis that dilution of propofol to a 0.5% emulsion might reduce the incidence of pain during propofol injection. METHODS: The study design was prospective, monocenter, double-blind, and randomized. Sixty-four children aged 2-6 yr were scheduled to receive 0.5% or 1.0% propofol in a medium-chain-triglyceride/long-chain-triglyceride emulsion. Incidence and intensity of pain were assessed by spontaneous expressions of pain and withdrawal of the arm. In a subgroup of 21 children, serum triglyceride levels were measured before and 3 and 20 min after induction. Adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Amounts of propofol required until loss of eyelash reflex were 4.40+/-1.01 mg/kg for 0.5% propofol and 4.31+/-0.86 mg/kg for 1.0% propofol. Percentages of children who showed at least one pain reaction were 23.3% in the 0.5% propofol group and 70.0% in the 1.0% propofol group (P<0.001). Serum triglycerides were higher in the 0.5% propofol group 3 and 20 min after injection (251.7 vs. 148.8 mg/dl; P=0.001 and 135.5 vs. 75.5 mg/dl; P=0.03). Adverse events or complications did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: Dilution of propofol to a 0.5% medium-chain-triglyceride/long-chain-triglyceride emulsion reduced pain effectively during injection in children aged 2-6 yr. Cumulative doses until 4-5 mg/kg propofol led to moderate increases of triglyceride levels and did not result in significant adverse events.

Child↗

Prolonged sedation of critically ill patients with midazolam or propofol: impact on weaning and costs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of sedation, the time required for weaning, and the costs of prolonged sedation of critically ill mechanically ventilated patients with midazolam and propofol. DESIGN: Open-label, randomized, prospective, phase IV clinical trial. SETTING: Medical and surgical intensive care unit (ICU) in a community hospital. PATIENTS: All ICU admissions (medical, surgical and trauma) requiring mechanical ventilation for > 24 hrs. A total of 108 patients were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive midazolam or propofol. The dose range allowed for each drug was 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg/hr for midazolam and 1 to 6 mg/kg/hr for propofol. The lowest dose that achieved an adequate patient-ventilator synchrony was infused. All patients received 0.5 mg/kg/24 hrs of morphine chloride. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The level of sedation was quantified by the Ramsay scale every 2 hrs until weaning from mechanical ventilation was started. If sedation could not be achieved by infusing the highest dose of midazolam or propofol, the case was recorded as a therapeutic failure. In the propofol group, serum triglycerides were determined every 72 hrs. Concentrations of > 500 mg/dL were also recorded as a therapeutic failure. When the patient was ready for weaning according to defined criteria, sedation was interrupted abruptly and the time from interruption of sedation to the first T-bridge trial and to extubation was measured. Cost analysis was performed based on the cost of intensive care in our unit ($54/hr). In the midazolam group (n = 54), 15 (27.8%) patients died; 11 (20.4%) patients had therapeutic failure; and 28 (51.8%) patients were subjected to a T-bridge trial. In the propofol group (n = 54), these proportions were 11 (20.4%), 18 (33.4% [including seven due to inadequate sedation, and 11 due to hypertriglyceridemia]), and 25 (46.2%), respectively. None of these values was significantly different between the two groups. Duration of sedation was 141.7 +/- 89.4 (SD) hrs and 139.7 +/- 84.7 hrs (p = NS), and cost (US dollars) attributed to sedation was $378 +/- 342 and $1,047 +/- 794 (p = .0001) for the midazolam and propofol groups, respectively. In the midazolam group, time from discontinuation of the drug infusion to extubation was 97.9 +/- 54.6 hrs (48.9 +/- 47.2 hrs to the first disconnection, and 49.0 +/- 23.7 hrs to extubation). In the propofol group, time from discontinuation of the drug infusion to extubation was 34.8 +/- 29.4 hrs (4.0 +/- 3.9 hrs to the first disconnection, and 30.8 +/- 29.2 hrs to extubation). The difference between the two groups in the weaning time was 63.1 +/- 12.5 (SEM) hrs (p < .0001). Cost per patient in the midazolam group (including ICU therapy and sedation with midazolam) was $10,828 +/- 5,734. Cost per patient in the propofol group was $9,466 +/- 5,820, $1,362 less than in the midazolam group. CONCLUSIONS: In our population of critically ill patients sedated with midazolam or propofol over prolonged periods, midazolam and propofol were equally effective as sedative agents. However, despite remarkable differences in the cost of sedation with these two agents, the economic profile is more favorable for propofol than for midazolam due to a shorter weaning time associated with propofol administration.

Adult↗

Propofol infusion syndrome in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Propofol infusion syndrome is a rare but often fatal syndrome, characterized by lactacidosis, lipaemic plasma and cardiac failure, associated with propofol infusion over prolonged periods of time. As propofol is used worldwide, knowledge of propofol infusion syndrome is essential for all anaesthesiologists and intensive care physicians. This review will provide an update on reported cases, and describe recent findings relevant to the pathophysiology and clinical presentation of propofol infusion syndrome. RECENT FINDINGS: Case reports of propofol infusion syndrome have contributed new pathophysiological evidence. Reported cases of similar syndromes may represent initial propofol infusion syndrome, and may help to identify further risk factors such as low carbohydrate supply and early warning signs such as lactacidosis. Newly identified gene defects mimicking propofol infusion syndrome may elicit the underlying genetic susceptibility. Recommendations for the limitation of propofol use have been devised by various institutions. SUMMARY: Propofol infusion syndrome must be kept in mind as a rare but highly lethal complication of propofol use, not necessarily confined to the prolonged use of propofol. Dose limitations must be adhered to, and early warning signs such as lactacidosis should lead to the immediate cessation of propofol infusion.

Acidosis↗

Age-dependent development of acute tolerance to propofol and its distribution in a pharmacokinetic compartment-independent rat model.

BACKGROUND: Previous animal and clinical studies have shown a dose-dependent increase in propofol concentrations in blood at wakening after propofol infusion. A development of an acute tolerance to propofol has been proposed. To elucidate this, brain concentrations of propofol at the time of an EEG end point was used as a measure of CNS sensitivity. METHODS: Twenty young or 20 old rats were assigned to either induction of anaesthesia with propofol or induction followed by maintenance of anaesthesia with intermittent propofol infusions during 60 minutes. All rats were killed at the EEG end point and samples of cerebral cortex, hippocampus, striatum, brain stem, cerebellum, blood, muscle and fat tissue were submitted to HPLC analysis of propofol concentrations. A new model describing the infusion requirements is introduced. RESULTS: The estimated infusion rate during maintenance declined exponentially with time at a slower rate in young compared with old rats. Old rats had higher propofol concentrations in blood, hippocampus, striatum, brain stem, cerebellum, muscle and fat after 60 minutes compared with induction. In contrast, young animals had no significant change in brain concentrations, but the propofol concentrations in muscle and fat were increased. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that maintenance of propofol anaesthesia may alter the CNS sensitivity to propofol in old animals, i.e. an acute tolerance may develop. Young animals do not seem to be capable of developing an acute tolerance to propofol. The results also support previous findings that a redistribution is important for the rapid clearance of propofol from blood.

Aging↗

The influence of age and administration rate on the brain sensitivity to propofol in rats.

BACKGROUND: It is well established that the dose of propofol for induction of anaesthesia is influenced by patient age. This may be explained by differences in pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics. To evaluate the effect of age on propofol pharmacodynamics, the brain concentration of propofol at the time of an EEG end-point was used as a measure of CNS sensitivity. METHODS: Ninety-five rats were assigned to 4 groups. Anaesthesia was induced by continuous propofol infusion at different rates. The dose of propofol and duration of anaesthesia were determined from 23 up to 776 days of age. The rats were killed at 23, 287 or 776 days of age at the EEG end-point and samples of cerebral cortex, midbrain, cerebellum, serum and fat tissue were submitted to HPLC analysis of propofol concentrations. RESULTS: The induction dose of propofol varied with age and administration rate. Young animals needed a higher dose of propofol. Old animals had higher brain concentrations of propofol at the EEG end-point than young animals. However, propofol concentrations in serum were higher in young animals. The propofol concentration in the brain was influenced by the administration rate. CONCLUSION: The dose of propofol for induction of anaesthesia in rats is influenced by animal age and administration rate. Young animals need a larger induction dose than old rats, but are more sensitive as measured by the brain concentration of propofol. The larger induction dose in young rats when compared with adults is explained by pharmacokinetic differences rather than by pharmacodynamic changes.

Aging↗

Potentiation, activation and blockade of GABAA receptors of clonal murine hypothalamic GT1-7 neurones by propofol.

1. The actions of GABA and the intravenous general anaesthetic propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) on GABAA receptors of self-replicating GT1-7 hypothalamic neurones were investigated by the patch clamp technique. 2. GABA (1 microM-1 mM) dose-dependently activated inward currents with an EC50 of 27 microM, recorded from whole cells voltage-clamped at -60 mV. GABA (100 microM)-activated currents reversed at the Cl-equilibrium potential. 3. Propofol (0.1-100 microM) dose-dependently potentiated GABA (100 microM)-evoked currents with an EC50 of 5 microM. 4. In the absence of GABA, propofol (10 microM-1 mM) activated small inward currents with a reversal potential similar to the Cl- equilibrium potential. The peak current amplitudes activated by propofol were only 31% of those activated by GABA in the same cells. 5. Like GABA (100 microM)-activated currents, propofol (100 microM)-activated currents were inhibited by the GABAA receptor antagonist, bicuculline (10 microM) and were abolished by Zn2+ (100 microM). 6. Propofol (10, 30 and 100 microM) dose-dependently activated currents in the absence of GABA. However, the peak amplitude of currents activated by propofol declined with concentrations > 100 microM. The cessation of application of a high dose of propofol (1 mM) was associated with a current 'surge'. 7. The surge current, seen after application of propofol (1 mM), had a reversal potential similar to the Cl- equilibrium potential. The ratio between peak current amplitude in the presence of propofol (1 mM) and surge current amplitude after propofol application, were not dependent on holding potential. Thus,it is unlikely that the surge current represents reversal of a voltage-dependent block of GABAA receptors by propofol.8. The amplitude of the surge current exceeded the amplitude of the initial propofol (1 mM)-evoked current following brief applications, but declined after prolonged applications of the drug.9. The observed modulatory actions of propofol may be due to separate potentiation, activation and inhibitory sites for this anaesthetic agent on GT1-7 cell GABAA receptors.

Animals↗

Nurse-administered propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for upper endoscopy in cirrhotic patients.

OBJECTIVES: Upper GI endoscopy is often performed in patients with chronic liver disease to screen for esophageal and gastric varices. Propofol is currently under evaluation as an alternative to the combination of midazolam and meperidine for sedation during endoscopic procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare nurse-administered propofol to midazolam and meperidine for sedation in patients with chronic liver disease undergoing diagnostic upper GI endoscopy. METHODS: Twenty outpatients who had known chronic liver disease (Child-Pugh class A or B) and were undergoing variceal screening were randomized to receive propofol or midazolam plus meperidine for sedation. Administration of sedation was performed by a registered nurse and supervised by the endoscopist. Outcome measures studied were induction and recovery times, efficacy and safety of sedation, patient satisfaction, and return to baseline function. RESULTS: The mean dose of propofol and meperidine/midazolam administered was 203 mg (SD 43.7, range 150-280) and 71.3 mg (SD 17.7, range 50-100)/5.3 mg (SD 0.9, range 3.0-6.0), respectively. The mean time to achieve adequate sedation was 3.6 min (SD 1.2) for the propofol group in comparison to 7.3 min (SD 2.8) for the meperidine/midazolam group (p<0.05). Procedure times between the groups were similar: propofol, 3.9 min (SD 1.9); midazolam/meperidine, 2.7 min (SD 0.8) (p=0.11). The level of sedation achieved by the propofol group was greater (p=0.0001). Time to full recovery was faster in the propofol group: 34.9 min (SD 10.3) versus 51.6 min (SD 18.4) (p<0.05). The mean time to reach a maximal level of alertness on the Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation Scale for the propofol group was 15 min (SD 3.6) versus 29 min (SD 10.5) (p=0.001). Although both groups recorded a high level of satisfaction, patients receiving propofol expressed greater overall mean satisfaction with the quality of their sedation at the time of discharge (p<0.05), and reported a return to baseline function sooner in the majority of cases. Propofol achieved comparable levels of efficacy and safety to meperidine/midazolam in our study group. Both were well tolerated with minimal complications. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol sedation administered by registered nurses in the setting of adequate patient monitoring is efficacious and well tolerated in patients with liver disease who are undergoing variceal screening by upper endoscopy. Patients were more satisfied with the quality of sedation, and return to baseline function was usually sooner compared to results achieved with midazolam/meperidine. Propofol offers advantages over meperidine/midazolam in cirrhotic patients.

Aged↗