Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Pattern Recognition, Visual”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Recognition potential: sensitivity to visual field stimulated.

The recognition potential (RP) was distinguished from P3 and eye blink responses by its sensitivity to visual area stimulated. Images were flashed in upper and lower hemifields. Current source density profiles were computed, using 16 midline scalp electrodes. For P3 and eye blink profiles, the hemifield stimulated was not a significant factor. For the recognition potential, upper and lower field stimulation produced radically different profiles. An improved recognition potential signal was obtained by a new mathematical procedure. It used the difference in sensitivity to visual area stimulated to reject P3 and eye blink responses.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Contour, color and shape analysis beyond the striate cortex.

The corticocortical pathway from striate cortex into the temporal lobe plays a crucial role in the visual recognition of objects. Anatomical studies indicate that this pathway is mainly organized as a serial hierarchy of multiple visual areas, including V1, V2, V3, V4, and inferior temporal cortex (IT). As expected from the anatomy, we have found that neurons in V4 and IT, like those in V1 and V2, are sensitive to many kinds of information relevant to object recognition. In the spatial domain, many V4 cells exhibit length, width, orientation, direction of motion and spatial frequency selectivity. In the spectral domain, many V4 cells are also tuned to wavelength. Thus, V4 is not specialized to analyze one particular attribute of a visual stimulus; rather, V4 appears to process both spatial and spectral information in parallel. A special contribution of V4 neurons to visual processing may lie in specific spatial and spectral interactions between their small excitatory receptive fields and large silent suppressive surrounds. Thus, although the excitatory receptive fields of V4 neurons are small, the responses of V4 neurons are influenced by stimuli throughout a much larger portion of the visual field. In IT, neurons also appear to process both spatial and spectral information throughout a large portion of the visual field. However, unlike V4 neurons, the excitatory receptive fields of IT neurons are very large. Many IT neurons, for example, are selective for the overall shape, color, or texture of a stimulus, anywhere within the central visual field. Together, these results suggest that within the areas of the occipito-temporal pathway, many different stimulus qualities are processed in parallel, but the type of analysis may become more global at each stage of processing.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Benefit from visual cues in auditory-visual speech recognition by middle-aged and elderly persons.

The benefit derived from visual cues in auditory-visual speech recognition and patterns of auditory and visual consonant confusions were compared for 20 middle-aged and 20 elderly men who were moderately to severely hearing impaired. Consonant-vowel nonsense syllables and CID sentences were presented to the subjects under auditory-only, visual-only, and auditory-visual test conditions. Benefit was defined as the difference between the scores in the auditory-only and auditory-visual conditions. The results revealed that the middle-aged and elderly subjects obtained similar benefit from visual cues in auditory-visual speech recognition. Further, patterns of consonant confusions were similar for the two groups.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1996

The recognition potential and conscious awareness.

The idea that conscious awareness of a recognizable image is necessary for it to evoke the recognition potential (RP) was tested by asking bilingual subjects to selectively attend to superimposed English and Chinese word images. The subjects detected most of the words in the attended language, but were largely oblivious of words in the non-attended language. Attended word images evoked the RP. Non-attended words did not. RP latency was less for Chinese than for English words. This provided a basis for inferring which language a subject was trying to read when valid English and Chinese words were both present. A subject was looking for Chinese if the latency was short and for English if it was long. The results showed that selective attention had a powerful effect on the RP. They supported the idea that conscious awareness is necessary for evoking it, though they did not rule out the theoretical possibility that some method not yet tested could be found that would block conscious awareness without blocking the RP. The sensitivity of the RP to what a subject is trying to see and its low variance seem to provide advantages for studying visual perception. It provides a short latency indicator of image processing that merits further investigation. Use of it may lead to a better understanding of visual perceptual processes.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Visual evoked response abnormality in myoclonus epilepsy with large pupils. Occurrence in a family with acorpuscular myoclonus epilepsy.

Flash and pattern evoked responses were recorded from three siblings with myoclonus epilepsy who all had strikingly large pupils in daylight. Comparison with the visual evoked responses (VERs) of 15 normal and eight epileptic control subjects (including one with myoclonus epilepsy but normal pupils) disclosed a substantial reduction of the amplitude of the flash response as compared with the normal pattern response in these three patients. It is suggested that the VER constellation and the pupillary abnormality, together with the normal electroretinogram and diffusely distributed relative scotomas, were due to a ganglion cell loss in the retina.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Neuroelectric concepts: form-color classification.

Visual event-related potentials (VEPs) were recorded from the scalp of human observers who viewed an orthogonal stimulus set, consisting of four stimuli, each of which had two attributes: a form (circle or triangle) and a color (green or red). The stimulus set was represented by an a priori stimulus classification model, defined by positions (i.e., degrees of arc) on a unit circle that specified the relationships among the form and color features. An analysis of VEP deviation waveshapes (delta VEP: deviations around average VEP for each electrode) showed that the a priori unit circle model predicted morphologies of the delta VEP waveshapes, as well as the overall relationships between waveshapes obtained for the form and the color attributes. Further analyses demonstrated that individual delta VEP waveshapes for color and for form were located on the circumference of a unit circle at the positions (angle) specified by the a priori model. The studies show that formal modeling of the way humans classify stimulus attributes provides a quantitative and predictive model of the way VEPs become classified and organized according to psychological principles.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

The human motion VEP as a function of size and eccentricity of the stimulation field.

A 'motion onset VEP' was elicited by the onset of a pattern drift. The amplitude of the most distinct wave (AN200) was determined on the following stimulation conditions: eccentricity, 0 to 23 deg; velocity. 1.5 to 16 deg/s; spatial frequency, 0.19 to 2.1 c/deg; and stimulation field size, 0.2 to 160 deg2, AN200 remained constant at any degree of eccentricity if stimulation field size, velocity, and spatial frequency were M-scaled according to Rovamo-Virsu's M-equations. AN200 decreased as a function of eccentricity if field size and velocity were kept constant (spatial frequency had minimal effect). The size of the cortical representation field (Sc) in this case varied with change in eccentricity (stimulation field size constant). In another experiment, it varied by change in stimulation field size (eccentricity constant). For both conditions, AN200 was proportional to log Sc.

Electrodes↗
PubMed1989

Retinal and retinocortical times to pattern stimulation in amblyopic children.

In order to determine whether in amblyopes retinal conduction delays contribute to the cortical measureable delays in the visual evoked cortical potential (VECP), peak latencies of the pattern electroretinogram (ERG) are measured in amblyopic children. The results are compared with those of the normal fellow eyes and those of a healthy control group. Simultaneously the latencies in the VECP are recorded and the determination of the retinocortical times is performed. Statistically retinal b-wave (Q) and a-wave (P) of the pattern ERG of amblyopic eyes do not show significant delays of peak latency. In retincortical times, however, there are significant prolongations. During occlusion therapy retinocortical values of normal fellow eyes are also delayed in comparison with the control group. A pathological conduction delay of visual information on the retinal level up to the generators of the pattern ERG can thus be excluded in amblyopia. The total latency delay in the VECP of amblyopes consists solely in a prolongation of retinocortical times.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Detection duration thresholds and evoked potential measures of stereosensitivity.

Visual evoked potentials have been proposed by some researchers to be more useful than behavioral techniques to evaluate stereo performance in children and certain clinical populations. Stimulus duration detection thresholds, visual evoked potentials, and scalp electrical potential distribution maps to dynamic random dot stereograms were studied. A high degree of correspondence was found between visual evoked potential amplitudes and behaviorally determined detection thresholds. Upper field stimuli had higher detection thresholds and generated lower-amplitude visual evoked potential responses than did centrally presented stimuli. For the most eccentrically presented stimuli, lower detection thresholds were found for stimuli presented in the right visual field than the left visual field. This finding was consistent with the pattern of VEP responses to be lateralized, with higher-amplitude responses recorded over left-hemisphere sites. The study examined a proposal that the major negative component of the stereoscopic visual evoked potential originates in cortical area V1. The results failed to support the proposal and were consistent with the main negative component of the VEP being generated in V2, rather than V1.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

The effect of spatial frequency and contrast on the latency in the visual evoked potential.

The latency in the visual evoked potential was measured at spatial frequencies of 2-12 c/deg in 10 subjects. The contrast levels of the sinuosoidal grating patterns were set at 1.5, 1.75, 2.0, 2.25, 2.5, 2.75 and 3.0 log units above each subject's contrast sensitivity threshold. Two factors were shown to influence the latency: suprathreshold contrast and, to a lesser extent, spatial frequency. The visual evoked potential latencies at contrast sensitivity threshold were extrapolated. These threshold latencies showed considerable variation with spatial frequency and between subjects. Therefore, the visual evoked potential latency cannot be considered a useful tool for estimating the contrast sensitivity function.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Visual evoked cortical potentials from transient dark and bright stimuli. Selective 'on' and 'off-pathway' testing?

The superior hemifields of five normal left eyes were stimulated by novel equal and opposite contrast pattern onset stimuli which were generated on a cathode ray tube. Patterns consisted of 144 discs, each subtending 60 min arc at the viewing distance of 40 cm and were separated by a distance equal to their diameter. Equal and opposite light changes were created by presenting the disc patterns with different luminance values on a uniform constant background (20 cd/m2). Transient visual evoked cortical potentials to the appearance and disappearance of the patterns were recorded separately and analysed. Significant amplitude differences between the responses to bright and dark stimuli were observed with light increment responses being 36-53% larger than the light decrement responses for pattern on-set and 54-80% larger for pattern off-set respectively. This finding is attributed to the difference in the input to the ON and OFF Parallel Pathways which are known to carry light increment and decrement information respectively, as well as differences in the metabolic and discharge rates of these pathways.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Topographical study of stereo-related potentials.

In order to estimate objectively binocular vision and especially stereopsis, random dot stereograms generated by a personal computer were used. Brain activity during stereopsis was topographically studied by visually evoked potentials (VEPs). The potentials evoked by binocular viewing of patterns without disparity, e.g. correlogram, were very similar to the potentials evoked from patterns with disparity, i.e. stereogram, as many authors have already indicated. To derive the stereo-related potentials from the VEP elicited by stereograms, the potentials evoked by correlograms were subtracted from the potentials evoked by stereograms, and the differences of topographical distribution between normal and stereoblind subjects were investigated.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Visual evoked potential evidence for parallel processing of depth- and form-related information in human visual cortex.

This paper describes the first of two complementary studies designed to identify and to investigate the properties and likely functional significance of independently generated components of scalp-recorded responses evoked by stationary patterns. These experiments compared the influence of various stimulus parameters, including site of stimulation, pattern form, nature of background field and several binocular and monocular depth cues on a single subject's visual evoked potentials. The results revealed the presence, inter alia, of two topographically distinct components with the following properties. The earlier component (C2), whose polarity depends on the stimulus location in the visual field, is: contour-specific; best evoked by discrete pattern elements, but not gratings, in the central few degrees of the visual field; insensitive to any depth cues. By contrast, the later (consistently) negative potential (LNP) is not dependent on the form of the stimulus and is larger for paracentrally (beyond 1.5 degrees) than centrally located stimuli. It is also selectively enhanced by both monocular and binocular depth-cue stimuli, including the simulated forward movement of a pattern relative to a steady textured background; a stimulus which evokes no C2. The respective response properties of these scalp potentials suggest that there is parallel processing of depth- and contour-related features of stationary stimuli in anatomically separate regions of the human visual cortex.

Cues↗