Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Inhalation Spacers”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources

Comparing the delivery of albuterol metered-dose inhaler via an adapter and spacer device in an in vitro infant ventilator lung model.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the delivery of an albuterol metered-dose inhaler (MDI) (Ventolin) via an Aerochamber (Monaghan) with an inline adapter (Medicomp Straight Swivel) in an in vitro infant lung model. METHODS: An in vitro infant lung model was modified to compare the delivery of albuterol MDI 10 inhalations via an Aerochamber with an inline adapter. The adapter and Aerochamber were placed at the endotracheal tube. A 1000 mL intravenous bag filled with 500 mL deionized water was attached to a 3.5 mm endotracheal tube (10 cm length). An Infant Bear Cub ventilator was used at the following settings: positive inspiratory pressure 20 cm H2O, intermittent mandatory ventilation 40 breaths/min, positive end expiratory pressure 4 cm H2O, and inspiratory time 0.5 second. Each device was run at least 10 times and assayed in duplicate by HPLC. An unpaired Student's t-test was used to analyze the statistical significance of the data. RESULTS: There was significantly greater delivery of albuterol with the Aerochamber (19.49 +/- 7.23 microg; 2.17% +/- 0.8%) as compared with an inline adapter (1.0625 +/- 1.36 microg; 0.12% +/- 0.15%) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The Aerochamber provides a greater delivery of albuterol metered-dose inhalations to the lung than the inline adapter in an in vitro infant lung model.

Albuterol↗

Effectiveness of salmeterol in stable COPD.

Thirty patients of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were studied for evaluation of effectiveness of inhaled salmeterol in a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial for seven days. Baseline spirometery and breathlessness score after 6 minutes walk test were assessed in all patients. Bronchial asthma was excluded in each patient by reversibility test with 200 ug of salbutamol inhalation. After inhalation of two puffs from a given inhaler through spacer device in the morning, spirometery was carried out 1, 3, 6 and 12 hrs after inhalation on day 1, 3 and 7 of trial. Six minutes walk test and breathlessness score were assessed after 3 hrs of inhalation on days 1, 3 and 7. The maximum bronchodilator response to salmeterol was observed on 7th day at three hours after inhalation. The mean increase in FEV1 was 29.2% of baseline value, which was significant as compared to placebo where the mean increase in FEV1 was 3.3% of the baseline value. The peak rise in FEV1 was observed at three hours after inhalation on all the three days. The bronchodilator effect of salmeterol persisted for upto 12 hours. The mean maximum increase in walking distance in 6 minutes walk test was observed on 7th day in salmeterol group, which was 50.7 metres whereas in placebo group it was 12.2 meters. The patients in salmeterol group perceived less breathlessness after the six minutes walk test. The study concluded that salmeterol 50 micrograms twice a day is effective in improving lung functions in patients with stable COPD and can be recommended as maintenance therapy for stable COPD patients.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Asthma in infants and small children.

The wheezy young child is a particularly challenging patient to treat. This article focuses on a diagnostic approach and some of the treatment issues peculiar to this age group. Specifically addressed are (1) the problem of differentiating asthma from wheezy bronchitis in babies and the clinical implications of this; (2) general concepts of treating babies in whom many commonly used drugs are not FDA approved; (3) inhalation therapy, especially the use of metered-dose inhalers with spacers; (4) the standard asthma drugs and their beneficial and adverse effects, with particular reference to inhaled steroids; and (5) the nonpharmacologic management of asthma. A brief discussion of long-term outcome is also included.

Asthma↗

[Inadequate technique in the use of inhalers in patients seen at a pneumology clinic].

OBJECTIVE: To assess inhalation technique in out-patient attending a respiratory ward who were using inhaler devices, and to identify factors associated with misuse of these therapies. METHOD: One hundred and seven patients were prospectively studied, of whom 100 completed the study; Inhalation technique was evaluated using a previously elaborated check list. We searched for significant differences between individuals with good or bad inhalation technique. RESULTS: Mean age: 68 +/- 11 years. 68 males and 32 females. Only 31% of cases were observed to make no inhalation errors when first evaluated. Individuals using metered-dose inhalers without spacer chamber made significantly more mistakes than patients using other devices. The main factor associated with poor inhalation technique was found to be the absence of adequate supervised instruction when the treatment was first prescribed. General practitioners were less likely to offer this instruction than other specialists. We did not find significant associations between inhaler misuse and patients' age, sex or the setting (hospital or ambulatory ward) where the treatment was first prescribed. CONCLUSIONS: Incorrect use of inhalers is a frequent finding, and an adequate instruction seems to associate with improvement of patients' skills with use of these devices. Health personnel should be aware that inhalation technique instruction is essential ingredient of patients' management.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Successful implementation of spacer treatment guideline for acute asthma.

AIMS: To develop and implement an evidence based guideline for the treatment of acute asthma using a metered dose inhaler and spacer combination. METHODS: Defined strategies were used for the development and implementation of a guideline, assessed by a prospective, descriptive, study using notes review, and patient, nursing, and medical staff telephone contact. The setting was a tertiary referral hospital in Victoria, Australia with 25 000 yearly admissions, and asthma accounting for about 7% of total. The first 200 children and families to use the guideline after its introduction were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 191 (95.5%) children were treated according to the guideline. Six (3.0%) children were given nebulisers appropriately based on severity; five (2.5%) were given nebulisers at parental or child choice; and four (2.0 %) who did not have severe asthma, received nebulised treatment inappropriately. CONCLUSIONS: Successful implementation of a new evidence based guideline can be achieved using specific strategies for promoting the application of research findings in the clinical arena.

Acute Disease↗

Comparative efficiency of commercial and improvised spacer device in acute bronchial asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a commercial spacer device versus an improvised spacer device in delivering aerosolized beta-2 agonist through metered dose inhaler in an acute exacerbation of bronchial asthma. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Urban tertiary care teaching hospital. METHODS: 60 children between 1 to 12 years of age with acute asthma were prospectively enrolled and randomized into two groups. Detailed history, clinical evaluation and appropriate laboratory investigations were recorded on a pretested proforma. One group received inhaled salbutamol using metered dose inhaler via commercial spacer device (Group 1), while the other received it via improvised spacer device (Group II). The response was sequentially assessed after 20, 40 and 60 minutes of institution of therapy. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable with respect to various parameters at presentation (p > 0.05). All the outcome parameters showed a significant improvement with time in both groups (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference between the response in the two groups (p< 0.05). CONCLUSION: Metered dose inhaler with improvised spacer device is equivalent in efficacy and a more cost effective alternative to metered dose inhaler with commercial spacer for administration of beta-2 agonist in acute asthma.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Efficacy of bronchodilators administered by nebulizers versus spacer devices in infants with acute wheezing.

The aim of this study was to compare the response of infants with acute wheezing to treatments with inhaled terbutaline when administered by nebulizer or by metered-dose inhaler and spacer device (MDI-spacer). Thirty-four infants between the ages of 1 and 24 months who were seen in our emergency department for acute wheezing were studied in a double-blind, randomized trial. The participants received two treatments of terbutaline at 20-min intervals, either by a nebulizer (2 mg/dose in 2.8 mL of 0.9% saline solution) or by an MDI-spacer device (0.5 mg/dose). The outcome measure was a clinical score, based on respiratory rate, degree of wheezing, retractions, degree of cyanosis, color, and pulse oximetry data measured before treatment, 20 min after the first treatment, and again 20 min after the second treatment. There was no difference in the rate of improvement in the clinical score between infants who received terbutaline by nebulizer and those who received it by MDI-spacer. We conclude that MDI-spacers and nebulizers are equally effective means of delivering beta-2 agonists to infants and small children with acute wheezing.

Acute Disease↗

Determinants of correct inhalation technique in children attending a hospital-based asthma clinic.

UNLABELLED: Many children with asthma use their inhaler device incorrectly even after comprehensive inhalation instruction. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with correct inhalation technique. Two hundred children with asthma demonstrated their inhalation technique. Patient characteristics and the components of inhalation instructions they had received were compared for children demonstrating a correct or incorrect inhalation technique. In addition, the inhalation technique of 47 newly referred patients was followed-up prospectively after repeated comprehensive instruction sessions. Seventy-eight percent of all patients demonstrated a correct inhalation technique. Patients who had received repeated instruction sessions and patients who had previously been asked to demonstrate the use of their inhaler during an instruction session were more likely than other children to demonstrate a correct inhalation technique (p < 0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that repetition of instructions was significantly associated with a correct inhalation technique (odds ratio (OR) 8.2, 95% CI 3.2-21.5; p < 0.0001) irrespective of type of inhaler used. Demonstration of the inhaler use by the patient was significantly associated with a correct inhalation technique for patients using a metered dose inhaler plus spacer device (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.0-12.6; p = 0.05). but not for patients using a dry powder inhaler (OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.4-6.4; p = 0.54). The number of newly referred patients demonstrating a correct inhalation technique improved from 57.4% to 97.9% after three comprehensive instruction sessions. CONCLUSION: Inhalation instruction should be given repeatedly to achieve and maintain correct inhalation technique in asthmatic children.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Evaluation of a clinical algorithm involving serum eosinophil cationic protein for guiding the anti-inflammatory treatment of bronchial asthma in childhood.

A pilot study was performed to investigate a clinical algorithm using serum-eosinophil cationic protein level (S-ECP) as an objective parameter for tapering the anti-inflammatory treatment in chronic childhood asthma. We studied 21 outpatient asthmatic children (6 girls and 15 boys, mean age 9 yr, range 3-12 yr, all with initial S-ECP > or = 15 microg/l) over a period of 12 months at monthly intervals. At each visit a short history, clinical examination, blood sample for S-ECP and eosinophil count, lung function tests and drug compliance were assessed. According to the initial S-ECP, patients were allocated to two anti-inflammatory treatment groups: patients with S-ECP between 15 microg/l and 30 microg/l were treated with Budesonide 200 microg twice daily, while patients with S-ECP of 30 microg/l and above received Budesonide 400 microg twice daily. After this induction treatment the anti-inflammatory medication was tapered at monthly intervals according to actually measured S-ECP: patients with S-ECP < 15 microg/l received sodium cromoglycate (SCG) 10 mg twice daily per inhalation via spacer, patients with S-ECP > or = 15 microg/l and < 30 microg/l received Budesonide 200 microg twice daily via spacer, and patients with S-ECP > or = 30 microg/l received Budesonide 400 microg twice daily. Prior to inhalation of topical steroids or SCG all patients had to inhale 500 microg Terbutaline twice daily for optimal bronchodilatation. The use of medication was assessed by weighing the metered dose inhaler containers each month. Our results showed a decrease in symptoms (p = 0.0001) and in S-ECP (p= 0.02) and MEF50% predicted (p= 0.02) after the initial month of Budesonide treatment. During a total of 246 months of investigation there was no need for emergency room treatment or hospital admission, and no need for oral steroids. During the whole study period there was a tendency for inhaled steroids to be more effective than SCG in reduction of markers of airway inflammation, improvement of symptoms and lung function. Inadequate use of medication was related to an increase in S-ECP in all treatment groups. From this open pilot study it is concluded that a clinical algorithm including S-ECP for tapering the anti-inflammatory treatment may be helpful in childhood asthma. These first observations should be confirmed by a controlled long-term study.

Algorithms↗

Choosing therapy for childhood asthma.

Inhaled corticosteroids remain the primary long-term treatment for controlling childhood asthma. Sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn sodium) and nedocromil sodium are both well tolerated, but usually less effective, alternatives to corticosteroids. Long-acting beta(2)-agonists (beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists) may be useful adjuncts in patients already receiving inhaled corticosteroids who require frequent use of short-acting bronchodilators or experience nocturnal exacerbations (i.e. overall asthma control suboptimal). Theophylline has bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory effects and may also be used as an adjunct to inhaled corticosteroids. Leukotriene receptor antagonists are now an alternative as monotherapy in young children with mild persistent asthma, or as adjunctive therapy with inhaled corticosteroids as well. Short-acting inhaled beta(2)-agonists or other short-acting bronchodilators should be used as needed for acute episodes. For inhaled delivery, metered-dose inhalers with spacer devices (holding chambers) may be used as the delivery system in many patients, but the choice of inhalation method must be individualised, based largely on patient acceptance and compliance. Systemic corticosteroids may be used to gain prompt control when initiating long-term therapy in patients with severe, persistent asthma that does not respond to inhaled medication or in patients who are unable to take inhaled medication. The anti-immunoglobulin E antibody, omalizumab, is a novel therapy that attacks a fundamental immunopathological process of asthma and has shown promising results in several clinical trials.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

Comparison of inhaled fluticasone with intravenous hydrocortisone in the treatment of adult acute asthma.

RATIONALE: Several studies published in the second half of the 1990s have shown a therapeutic early effect of inhaled corticosteroids in acute asthma. However, systemic corticosteroids are considered the standard of care. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of repeated doses of inhaled fluticasone with the standard treatment of systemic corticosteroids in adult patients with severe acute asthma. METHODS: One hundred six patients (mean age, 33.5 +/- 8.8 years) were randomly assigned to receive fluticasone (3,000 microg/hour) administered through a metered-dose inhaler and spacer at 10-minute intervals for 3 hours, or 500 mg of intravenous hydrocortisone. In addition, all patients received inhaled albuterol and ipratropium bromide. MAIN RESULTS: Subjects treated with fluticasone showed 30.5 and 46.4% greater improvements in PEF and FEV1, respectively, compared with the hydrocortisone group. The fluticasone group had better PEF and FEV1 at 120, 150, and 180 minutes (p < 0.05). Also, the fluticasone group showed higher rates of patients who obtained the discharge threshold at 90, 120, and 150 minutes. This therapeutic benefit was particularly evident in those patients with the most severe obstruction. Subjects with a baseline FEV1 of less than 1 L treated with fluticasone showed a significant increase in pulmonary function (p = 0.001) and a significant decrease in hospitalization rate (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of repeated doses of inhaled fluticasone was more effective than intravenous hydrocortisone and was associated with an early improvement. This therapeutic benefit was particularly evident in those patients with the most severe obstruction.

Acute Disease↗

Efficacy of a home-made spacer with acute exacerbation of bronchial asthma: a randomized controlled trial.

Metered dose inhaler (MDI) with spacer is the preferred method for administration of aerosolized medications in pediatric asthma. The expense of commercial spacers limits their use and indigenous alternatives have therefore been developed. Information on the clinical efficacy of home-made spacers is limited. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of a valve-less home-made spacer with a commercial spacer in delivering salbutamol via MDI in acute asthma. Asthmatic children aged 5-15 years who presented with an acute exacerbation to the pediatric chest clinic of a tertiary care hospital were enrolled in a single blinded randomized parallel group study. The study patients received 10 puffs of salbutamol (100 microg/puff) via MDI-home-made spacer or MDI-commercial spacer. Pre and post inhalation measurements of peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), oxygen saturation (SaO2), respiratory rate (RR), pulse rate (PR) were made and compared. Sixty children were enrolled in the study, 31 were administered salbutamol via the home-made spacer and 29 via the commercial spacer. The median increase in PEFR was similar in both the groups (20.8% vs 22.2%, p=0.4), clinical improvement being satisfactory in all patients. The valve-less home-made spacer is equally efficacious and cheaper than the commercial spacer in administering bronchodilators in acute exacerbations of asthma. Further studies on the efficacy of home-made spacer in delivery of inhaled steroids are needed.

Adolescent↗

Funhaler spacer: improving adherence without compromising delivery.

A novel asthma spacer device, the "Funhaler", incorporates incentive toys which are isolated from the main inspiratory circuit by a valve. Here we show that its use does not compromise drug delivery. Improved adherence combined with satisfactory delivery characteristics suggest that the Funhaler may be useful for management of young asthmatics.

Aerosols↗

A 500-ml plastic bottle: an effective spacer for children with asthma.

Inhaled therapy using a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with attached spacer has been increasingly recognized as the optimal method for delivering asthma medication for acute attacks and chronic prophylaxis. However, in developing countries the cost and availability of commercially produced spacers limit the use of MDI-spacer delivery systems. A 500-ml plastic bottle has been recently adapted to function as a spacer. This article reviews the current data on the efficacy of this bottle-spacer and discusses its advantages and limitations. It is concluded that a modified 500-ml plastic bottle is an effective spacer; modification and use of this device should be incorporated into international guidelines for the management of children with asthma.

Anti-Asthmatic Agents↗

Optimum use of a spacer device.

Nedocromil sodium given by the Fisonair spacer should be inhaled immediately. Multiple actuations into the spacer should be avoided. Delay of 20 seconds before sampling reduced the amount of drug available for inhalation in the respirable range by 81%. Placing two actuations into the spacer reduced the amount of drug available by 47%.

Administration, Inhalation↗