Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Ifosfamide”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Ifosfamide treatment of recurrent or metastatic endometrial stromal sarcomas previously unexposed to chemotherapy: a study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness and toxicity of ifosfamide chemotherapy in women with metastatic or recurrent endometrial stromal sarcomas unexposed to other chemotherapy. METHODS: In a prospective, multi-institutional phase II study conducted by the Gynecology Oncology Group, the starting dose of ifosfamide was 1.5 g/m2 given daily intravenously (i.v.) for 5 days (reduced to 1.2 g/m2 daily in patients who had previously received radiotherapy). Mesna (2 mercaptoethane sodium sulfonate) was given i.v. immediately and at 4 and 8 hours after the administration of ifosfamide. Each dose of mesna was 20% of the total daily dose of ifosfamide. Patients were treated every 3 weeks if blood counts permitted. Therapy was discontinued if there was progression of the cancer or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were entered into this study. One was excluded from analysis because of the wrong histologic type, leaving 21 evaluable for response and toxicity. Gynecologic Oncology Group grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia occurred in four patients (19%), and one patient each experienced Gynecologic Oncology Group grade 4 anemia and genitourinary toxicity. Three patients experienced complete tumor responses and four had partial responses, for an overall response rate of 33.3%. CONCLUSION: Ifosfamide is active in the therapy of women with chemotherapy-naive metastatic or recurrent endometrial stromal sarcomas.

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating↗
PubMed1991

Ifosfamide-induced neurotoxicity.

Ifosfamide is an active chemotherapeutic agent in a wide range of gynecologic tumors; favorable response rates have been reported in ovarian (epithelial and germ cell), uterine, and cervical neoplasms. Central neurotoxicity is a known, but poorly described side effect. We report 23 patients who received a total of 75 cycles of ifosfamide, either as a single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. Six of twenty-three (26%) experienced grade 4 neurotoxicity; clinical presentation included confusion, aphasia, hallucinations, and coma. All patients exhibited the first evidence of neurotoxicity by the end of the 24-hr infusion. Three of six patients with grade 4 neurotoxicity expired within 14 days of receiving ifosfamide. The neurotoxicity resolved over 2 to 4 days in the remaining patients. Serum albumin was normal (greater than 3.5 g/dl) in 63 cycles of ifosfamide not associated with neurotoxicity. When serum albumin was less than 3.5 g/dl, 6 of 12 cycles were associated with severe neurotoxicity (P less than 0.001). Low serum albumin (less than 3.5 g/dl) appears to be associated with a high risk of severe neurotoxicity in patients receiving single-dose ifosfamide therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Combination therapy of ACNU and ifosfamide in tumor bearing mice with M2661 breast cancer, B16 malignant melanoma or C38 colon cancer.

Three murine tumor lines, B16 melanoma, C38 colon cancer and M2661 breast cancer, were used to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of the drug combination ACNU and ifosfamide. For each tumor type five treatment groups of 12 mice each were studied, which respectively received 16.5 mg/kg ACNU, 150 mg/kg ifosfamide, 33 mg/kg ACNU, 300 mg/kg ifosfamide or 16.5 mg/kg ACNU + 150 mg/kg ifosfamide. One group served as controls. Growth delay was measured as the endpoint. In the B16 and C38 tumor lines both drugs were active and showed additive antitumor effects. However, no synergism was observed. Neither ACNU or ifosfamide or the combination of both had any activity against the M2661 tumor line.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Determination of urinary 2- and 3-dechloroethylated metabolites of ifosfamide by high-performance liquid chromatography.

In vivo oxidation of chloroethyl side-chains on ifosfamide produces the toxin chloroacetaldehyde. Production of this labile metabolite can be indirectly quantitated by monitoring the excretion of the residual 2- and 3-dechloroethylated ifosfamide. Urinary ifosfamide and the two dechloroethylated metabolites were extracted into chloroform from alkalinized salt-saturated urine, followed by high-performance liquid chromatographic separation using an acetonitrile gradient on a reversed-phase column and ultraviolet detection at 190 nm. In five patients given 1.6 g/m2 ifosfamide, 11-30% of the dose was excreted over 24 h as unchanged drug, 11-21% as 3-dechloroethylated and 3-10% as 2-dechloroethylated ifosfamide.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2006

Phase 1 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer study determining safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) in combination with ifosfamide in previously untreated adult patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas.

This phase I study evaluated the toxicity of first-line combined pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) and ifosfamide in patients with advanced and/or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. Five dose levels (L) were studied: Caelyx 30 mg/m2 (L1-4) or 40 mg/m2 (L5) 1-h infusion d 1 q 3 weeks + ifosfamide and mesna at X g/m2/4 h d 1-3 q 3 weeks at five doses: L1: X = 1.7 g; L2: X = 2 g; L3: X = 2.5 g; L4 and L5: X = 3 g. Cohorts of 3 patients were entered at each level unless a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred. In case of DLT in 1 of 3 patients a new cohort was added. Toxicity was evaluated by Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC). A total of 28 patients was included: 4 at dose L1, 8 at L2, 3 at L3, 6 at L4, and 7 at L5. Median age was 60 years (range 29-69 years). Male/female ratio was 12/16. Seventy-five percent of patients had a performance status of 1.0 and 36% had leiomyosarcomas. No DLT was observed at dose L1-4. Six patients developed a DLT at dose L5, and thus the recommended dose is level 4 (i.e. Caelyx 30 mg/m2/1 h d 1+ifosfamide at 3 g/m2/4 h d 1-3 q 3 weeks). Few haematological and biochemical events were observed and the principal toxicities were granulocytopaenia and leucopaenia. Five patients discontinued therapy because of toxicity, 4 of them at dose level 5. Non-haematological toxicities > grade 2 were also few. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) > grade 1 was not seen. Two patients obtained partial response (PR) and 13 stable disease (SD). Median overall survival (OS) was 333 d and median progression-free survival (PFS) 174 d. In conclusion, this seems to be a feasible combination in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas, allowing ifosfamide to be given in a dosage similar to that used when given alone. The recommended dose for future studies is Caelyx 30 mg/m2/1 h d 1+ifosfamide 3 g/m2/4 h d 1-3 q 3 weeks.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Dose-finding study of fixed dose gemcitabine and escalating doses of ifosfamide given on days 1 and 8 in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

UNLABELLED: This is a dose-finding study of fixed dose gemcitabine and escalating doses of ifosfamide, in chemo naïve patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The purpose of the study was to determine the optimal dosage and the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of a specified schedule of gemcitabine and ifosfamide. Patients received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 and ifosfamide between 1.6 and 2.2 g/m2, intravenously, on days 1 and 8, repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of four cycles. RESULTS: Sixteen patients entered the study. Three patients were entered at the first dose level of ifosfamide (1.6 g/m2) and none experienced any dose limiting (DLT) toxicity. In dose level 2 (1.8 g/m2), two patients had grade IV haematological toxicities, but they reached 21 days without any other dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Three further patients entered at this level but they were withdrawn due to disease progression. The sixth patient entered without any DLT. Three patients entered dose level 3 (2.0 g/m2), without any grade IV toxicity. The first patient entered into dose level 4 (2.2 g/m2), had progressive disease within 21 days and was withdrawn and another three were entered and had no DLT during the first 21 days. Four (33%) of the patients had stable disease and 67% had progressive disease. CONCLUSION: The MTD of the ifosfamide gemcitabine combination was not reached in the present study, as no DLT was observed. This combination at the dose levels of this protocol has little or no activity in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Prophylaxis and reversal of ifosfamide encephalopathy with methylene-blue.

The antineoplastic ifosfamide produces dose-dependent signs of neurotoxicity. After ifosfamide overdose in a patient, we found excessive urinary excretion of glutaric acid and sarcosine, which is compatible with glutaric aciduria type II, a defect in mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation that results from defective electron transfer to flavoproteins. We therefore used the electron-accepting drug methylene-blue as an antidote for ifosfamide encephalopathy. In one patient, ifosfamide neurotoxicity was rapidly reversed by methylene-blue 50 mg intravenously. In another patient with previous episodes of ifosfamide encephalopathy, methylene-blue was administered orally prophylactically. No symptoms of neurotoxicity were noted.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Phase II study of docetaxel and ifosfamide combination chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients failing previous chemotherapy with or without paclitaxel.

Docetaxel has shown activity in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has failed previous chemotherapy. Ifosfamide is an active alkylating agent used in the first-line treatment of NSCLC. We conducted a phase II study of docetaxel and ifosfamide chemotherapy in two groups (one with and one without previous paclitaxel treatment) of NSCLC patients who had failed previous chemotherapy, to assess the response and toxicity of this combination chemotherapy. Fifty patients were enrolled from June 2000 to December 2001, including 26 patients treated with paclitaxel-containing agents and 24 patients who had never been treated with paclitaxel. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) and ifosfamide 3 g/m(2) intravenous infusion on day 1 of every 3 weeks. Two hundred and thirty-eight cycles of treatment were given, with a median of 5 cycles (range, 1-8 cycles). All patients were evaluable for toxicity profile and response rate. The major toxicity was myelosuppression. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 40 patients (80%) during treatment. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 7 patients (14%). Grade 3 anemia occurred in 2 patients. The majority of patients needed a decrease in the treatment dose due to grade 4 or febrile neutropenia. Interstitial pneumonitis occurred in 3 patients, leading to the death of two. Other toxicities were few and mild in severity. After two cycles of treatment, 5 patients (10%) had a partial response (95% confidence interval 1.7-18.3%), including 2 patients previously treated with paclitaxel and 3 who had not received this treatment. More patients who had been previously treated with paclitaxel suffered from progressive disease than among those who had never been treated with paclitaxel (P = 0.049). The median time to disease progression was 5 months and the median survival was 8.2 months. Median survival was 7.6 and 8.7 months, respectively, in patients with and without previous paclitaxel treatment (P = 0.56). Median survival was 8.7 and 7.6 months in patients receiving docetaxel and ifosfamide as second- and third-line chemotherapy, respectively (P = 0.327). In conclusion, docetaxel and ifosfamide salvage chemotherapy produces a relatively low response rate, low dose intensity, and higher proportion of severe neutropenia in NSCLC. Physicians should be alert to the potential of interstitial pneumonitis. Nevertheless, median survival was of a reasonable duration.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1983

Efficacy of ifosfamide in refractory malignant diseases and uroprotection by mesna: results of a clinical phase II-study with 151 patients.

In a clinical phase II study 151 patients with refractory malignant diseases were treated with ifosfamide (60 mg/kg/day i.v. days 1-5, q 21-28 days). Altogether, 490 courses of treatment were given, 92 with conventional prophylactic measures (continuous infusion of 3-4 litre physiological saline plus alkalinization of the urine) and 398 with mesna prophylaxis (12 mg/kg i.v., 0, 4 and 8 h after administration of ifosfamide). The overall response rate (min. 25% tumor reduction) was 67/151 (44%) including four complete remissions in a fairly unfavourable patient group with testicular teratoma (39/87), soft tissue sarcoma (10/16), malignant melanoma (2/7), osteogenic sarcoma (3/6), Ewing's sarcoma (2/6), lymphoma and acute leukemia (5/7) or other histologies (6/22). The response rate in patients pretreated by cyclophosphamide containing regimen was 7/19 (36%) including one complete remission and one partial remission. Mesna was highly effective in reducing the frequency of hemorrhagic cystitis from 25/92 (27%) to 16/398 (4%) ifosfamide courses. The antitumor activity of ifosfamide in testicular cancer was not reduced by mesna. In conclusion, ifosfamide with the potent uroprotector mesna appears to compare favourably with the most active agents in the treatment of malignant diseases.

Cyclophosphamide↗
PubMed2003

Comparative toxicity of ifosfamide metabolites and protective effect of mesna and amifostine in cultured renal tubule cells.

Renal injury is a common side effect of the chemotherapeutic agent ifosfamide. Current evidence suggests that the ifosfamide metabolite chloroacetaldehyde contributes to this nephrotoxicity. The present study examined the effects of chloroacetaldehyde and acrolein, another ifosfamide metabolite, on rabbit proximal renal tubule cells in primary culture. The ability of the uroprotectant medications sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate (mesna) and amifostine to prevent chloroacetaldehyde- and acrolein-induced renal cell injury was also assessed. Chloroacetaldehyde and acrolein (25-200 M) produced dose-dependent declines in neutral red dye uptake, glucose transport and glutathione content. Chloroacetaldehyde was a more potent toxin than acrolein. Pretreatment of cells with the glutathione-depleting agent buthionine sulfoximine enhanced the toxicity of both chloroacetaldehyde and acrolein while co-administration of mesna or amifostine prevented metabolite toxicity. These results support the hypothesis that chloroacetaldehyde is responsible for ifosfamide-induced nephrotoxicity. The protective effect of mesna and amifostine in vitro contrasts with clinical experience showing that these medications do not eliminate ifosfamide nephrotoxicity.

Acetaldehyde↗
PubMed2006

Peritoneal cancer treatment with CYP2B1 transfected, microencapsulated cells and ifosfamide.

The prognosis of peritoneal spread from gastrointestinal cancer and subsequent malignant ascites is poor, and current medical treatments available are mostly ineffective. Targeted chemotherapy with intraperitoneal prodrug activation may be a beneficial new approach. L293 cells were genetically modified to express the cytochrome P450 enzyme 2B1 under the control of a cytomegalovirus immediate early promoter. This CYP2B1 enzyme converts ifosfamide to its active cytotoxic compounds. The cells are encapsulated in a cellulose sulfate formulation (Capcell). Adult Balb/c mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with 1 x 10(6) colon 26 cancer cells, previously transfected with GFP to emit a stable green fluorescence, by injection into the left lower abdominal quadrant. Two or five day's later animals were randomly subjected to either i.p. treatment with ifosfamide alone or ifosfamide combined with microencapsulated CYP2B1-expressing cells. Peritoneal tumor volume and tumor viability were assessed 10 days after tumor inoculation by means of fluorescence microscopy, spectroscopy and histology. Early i.p. treatment with ifosfamide and CYP2B1 cells resulted in a complete response. Treatment starting on day 5 and single-drug treatment with ifosfamide resulted in a partial response. These results suggest that targeted i.p. chemotherapy using a combination of a prodrug and its converting enzyme may be a successful treatment strategy for peritoneal spread from colorectal cancer.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Risk factors for nephrotoxicity after ifosfamide treatment in children: a UKCCSG Late Effects Group study. United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group.

The aim of this multicentre study was to document the nephrotoxicity associated with ifosfamide and evaluate risk factors in 148 children and young people with sarcomas who underwent investigation of renal function on one occasion each, at a median of 6 (range 1-47) months after completion of ifosfamide (median dose 62.0 (range 6.1-165.0) g/m2). Investigations included glomerular filtration rate (GFR), serum bicarbonate (HCO3) and phosphate (PO4), and renal tubular threshold for phosphate (Tmp/GFR). A clinically relevant nephrotoxicity score' was derived. GFR was < 90 ml/min/1.73 m2 in 61 of 123 evaluable patients, Tmp/GFR < 0.9-1.1 mmol/l (age-dependent) in 45/103, serum PO4 < 0.9-1.mmol/l (age-dependent) in 28/135, and serum HCO3 < 20 (< 18 in infants) mmol/l in 22/95. Of 76 fully evaluable patients: 50% had mild, 20% moderate and 8% severe nephrotoxicity. Higher total ifosfamide dose correlated significantly with greater glomerular and tubular toxicity (P < 0.01); other risk factors, including age at treatment, demonstrated no consistent significant independent effect. Chronic ifosfamide-related glomerular and proximal tubular toxicity were common in this large comprehensive study. Restriction of total ifosfamide dose to < 84 g/m2 will reduce the frequency of, but not abolish, clinically significant nephrotoxicity, whilst doses > 119 g/m2 are associated with a very high risk of severe toxicity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Ifosfamide in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Ifosfamide has been used in combination with several drugs including cisplatin, giving rise to multiple doublets and triplets including the ifosfamide-cisplatin-mitomycin regimen (Cullen's MIC regimen) that has been commonly used in Europe. However, new combinations are challenging the activity of the old chemotherapy regimens, especially in terms of objective response rate and time to progressive disease, as has been shown in several phase III randomized trials. Among these new combinations, ifosfamide-vinorelbine and ifosfamide-gemcitabine-cisplatin are especially promising. In this paper, several ifosfamide doublets and triplets are reviewed.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1988

Ifosfamide.

The alkylating agent ifosfamide, an analog of cyclophosphamide, has demonstrated significant activity in soft tissue sarcoma and testicular carcinoma. Understanding and control of the urinary toxicity of ifosfamide therapy has allowed greater use and inclusion of ifosfamide in combinations in the treatment of malignant diseases. While preliminary results with ifosfamide in a number of diseases are encouraging, final determination of its efficacy awaits further study. A comprehensive review of preclinical data and clinical trials with ifosfamide is presented.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1996

Phase II study of a closely spaced ifosfamide--cisplatin schedule with the addition of G-CSF in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and malignant melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Ifosfamide and cisplatin are frequently combined cytotoxic agents. Both have a dose-response relationship. In view of this it appears attractive to study regimens with a higher dose intensity than usual. One way to increase the dose intensity is to shorten intervals between chemotherapy cycles. As bone marrow toxicity is dose limiting in ifosfamide-cisplatin combinations we started a phase II study with both drugs administered every 2 weeks in combination with G-CSF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer or malignant melanoma were eligible for the study. The treatment consisted of ifosfamide 2 gram/m2/day days 1-3 combined with mesna, and cisplatin 33 mg/m2/day days 1-3, administered in hypertonic saline (3% NaCl). G-CSF was started on day 4 at a dose of 5 micrograms/kg/day and was continued until day 12. The cycles were to be repeated every 2 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were entered in the study; 30 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Neutropenia (grade 4 in 16 patients) and thrombocytopenia (grade 4 in 15 patients) were the most common toxicities. Thrombocytopenia incidence and -duration increased per cycle and was the main cause of treatment delays especially after the third cycle. Only 4 patients were able to complete the planned treatment without any delay or dose reduction and reached the intended dose intensity of 3 gram/m2/week of ifosfamide and 50 mg/m2/week of cisplatin. Non haematologic toxicities were generally mild. Out of 22 evaluable patients with non-small cell lung cancer 6 responded (27%; 95% CI: 10%-48%) while only one out of 8 patients with melanoma responded. The median response duration was 26 weeks (range 16-36 weeks). CONCLUSION: The planned high-dose intensity of ifosfamide and cisplatin could be reached only for the first 2-3 cycles. Haematologic toxicity, especially cumulative thrombocytopenia, necessitated treatment delays jeopardizing the dose intensity. The response rate in non-small-cell lung cancer and melanoma was not superior to what can be expected from more conventional regimens.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Intermittent continuous infusion of ifosfamide and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND: In advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or ifosfamide results in response rates of approximately 20%. Continuous infusion of these drugs is on many grounds theoretically attractive and may therefore offer advantages over bolus or short-term infusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with progressive measurable disease and no previous chemotherapy entered the study. After implantation of a subcutaneous infusion chamber patients were treated on days 1-12 with ifosfamide (1.0 g/m2/day) and 5-FU (300 mg/m2/day) as a continuous intravenous infusion using a portable infusion pump. Mesna (1.0 g/m2/day) was added as uroprotective agent from day 1-14. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Fifteen of the 16 patients were evaluable for response. One partial response was observed (response rate 7% [95% CI: 0%-32%]). Toxicity occurred in 64% of the courses. Dose limiting toxic effects were grade 3 nausea/vomiting (WHO) in 3 patients, grade 2 mucositis in 1 patient and grade 4 leukopenia in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: Intermittent continuous infusion with ifosfamide, mesna and 5-FU is feasible on an outpatient basis. Although continuous infusion of ifosfamide may have a more favorable toxicity profile, the combination of 5-FU and ifosfamide in this schedule is no more effective than bolus or short-term infusion.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1986

The protective effect of 2-mercapto-ethane sulfonate (MESNA) on hemorrhagic cystitis induced by high-dose ifosfamide treatment tested by a randomized crossover trial.

High-dose ifosfamide (one or two courses of 6 g/m2) with or without mesna was administered to 13 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The protective effect of 2-mercapto-ethane sulfonate (mesna) against the urotoxic side effects induced by ifosfamide was examined by a randomized crossover trial. A significant reduction in the incidence of hematuria was observed in the patients receiving mesna. Macroscopic hematuria was observed in only one patient who received treatment with mesna versus seven patients treated with ifosfamide alone. Other symptoms, such as frequency and dysuria, tended to be diminished in the patients receiving mesna, although the difference was not statistically significant. Our results suggest that mesna is effective in preventing or diminishing ifosfamide-induced hemorrhagic cystitis. Concomitant use of mesna should allow the administration of a high dose of ifosfamide although more extensive studies are needed to define the optimal dose and schedule of administration of mesna to prevent or attenuate the hemorrhagic cystitis.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Ifosfamide and etoposide in the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcomas.

Ifosfamide is an active chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. This Phase II study attempted to evaluate the efficacy of the addition of etoposide to ifosfamide administered to patients with recurrent or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. Treatment consisted of etoposide 100 mg/m2, followed by ifosfamide 2.0 g/m2, daily, for 4 consecutive days. Mesna was administered for uroprotection. Cycles were repeated at 21-day intervals or upon recovery from toxicity. Two partial responses were observed in 19 evaluable patients (response rate 10.5%, 95% confidence interval, 7% to 14%). Response durations were brief at 2 and 6 months. In a subset of 10 patients with gastrointestinal leiomyosarcoma, no responses were observed. Toxicity was generally mild, consisting primarily of myelosuppression and controllable nausea and emesis. No episodes of hematuria were observed. Overall survival for all eligible patients was 10 months (range: 0.2 to 34.7+ months). Etoposide, in this dose and schedule, failed to enhance the activity of ifosfamide in adult soft tissue sarcoma. Additionally, this experience and a review of the literature, suggest that ifosfamide has little activity against gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas. Continued efforts are needed to identify novel agents with efficacy against these resistant tumors.

Adult↗