Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “General Practitioners”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Gender differences in general practitioners at work.

BACKGROUND: The proportion of female general practitioners is steadily increasing. AIM: To compare male and female general practitioners with respect to their job satisfaction and professional commitments within and outside their practices. METHOD: A questionnaire was sent to all 896 general practitioner principals with patients in Staffordshire in 1994. The main elements were: job satisfaction (on a five-point scale) from eight possible sources; whether personal responsibility was taken for 12 different practice tasks; and professional commitments outside the practice. RESULTS: A total of 620 (69%) general practitioners responded. Female doctors derived more satisfaction than male doctors from relationships with patients (P = 0.002). Female doctors were more likely to be working in training practices, and were likely to be on-call less and to work fewer sessions. Male general practitioners were more likely to take lead responsibility for practice computers, minor surgery, meeting external visitors and finance, whereas female practitioners were more likely to be responsible for looking after women patients' health. CONCLUSION: Considerable differences were found between male and female general practitioners. These differences are likely to have an increasing impact as the percentage of female general practitioners continues to rise.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1996

Anti-smoking advice in general practice consultations: general practitioners' attitudes, reported practice and perceived problems.

BACKGROUND: Anti-smoking advice from general practitioners has proven efficacy. However, general practitioners do not exploit a large proportion of opportunities to discuss smoking with patients. AIM: A study aimed to explore general practitioners attitudes towards discussing smoking with patients and to assess how these influence the quantity of anti-smoking advice that general practitioners report giving during routine consultations. It also aimed to determine the extent to which general practitioners report using evidence-based interventions against smoking and to discover the problems they experience when discussing smoking with patients. METHOD: A postal survey of all 468 general practitioners on the Leicestershire Family Health Services Authority list was conducted. General practitioners' attitudes were assessed by scoring 13 attitude statements using a six-point Likert-type scale. They were also asked to rank (from a list of 12 items) the five approaches that they found most productive and (from a list of 11 items) the five problems that they most commonly encountered when giving anti-smoking advice to patients. RESULTS: A total of 327 questionnaires (70%) were returned. Most respondents (97%) thought that their advice was more effective when linked to patients' presenting problems and 65% reported that linking their anti-smoking advice to patients' presenting complaints was one of their three most preferred approaches to discussing smoking. Advising all presenting smokers to quit was considered by 40% of respondents to be an appropriate use of time but 76% reported that patients' lack of motivation was one of the three most commonly encountered problems. An analysis of the ratings of the 13 statements suggested that general practitioners who reported the greatest smoking cessation activity during routine consultations held more positive attitudes towards discussing smoking with patients. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that general practitioners believe that their anti-smoking advice is more effective when linked to patients' presenting complaints, and this belief appears to be reflected in the way in which general practitioners approach smoking cessation with patients. The findings may indicate that general practitioners are unlikely to accept a role in a population-based anti-smoking strategy which demands that they discuss smoking with all presenting smokers.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1995

Alternative medicine and general practitioners. Opinions and behaviour.

OBJECTIVE: To describe general practitioners' opinions and behaviour regarding alternative medicine. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of a random sample of Ontario and Alberta general practitioners. SETTING: General practices in Ontario and Alberta. PARTICIPANTS: A questionnaire was mailed to 400 general practitioners. Of the 384 eligible physicians, 200 completed the questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reported beliefs and practices concerning alternative medicine. RESULTS: Acupuncture, chiropractic, and hypnosis were considered most useful and reflexology, naturopathy, and homeopathy least useful. Results showed 56% of general practitioners believed that alternative medicine has ideas and methods from which conventional medicine could benefit, 54% referred to alternative practitioners, and 16% practised some form of alternative medicine. Province of practice, place of graduation, training in alternative approaches, number of alternative approaches perceived useful, and attitude toward alternative medicine were clearly related to referring to alternative practitioners. Sex, age, type of practice, training in alternative medicine, referring to alternative practitioners, number of alternative approaches perceived useful, and attitude toward alternative medicine were related to practicing alternative medicine. CONCLUSION: Although acceptance and integration of alternative medicine extend only to certain approaches, alternative medicine cannot be discounted in general practice. A study encompassing all Canadian provinces could help in planning medical education and developing policies to guide physician behaviour.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

[The practice guideline 'Atrial fibrillation' from the Dutch College of General Practitioners; a response from the perspective of general practice].

The practice guideline 'Atrial fibrillation' (AF) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners is a clearly written survey on the diagnosis and treatment of AF in general practice. Rapid cardioversion is no longer an indication for acute referral in AF. As AF, heart failure and COPD often occur simultaneously among elderly people, the exact cause of the symptoms can be unclear. In these complicated cases, with the risk of polypharmacy, a single consultation between general practitioner and cardiologist would be more effective. For control of the rate of ventricular contraction during the treatment of AF, lipophilic beta-blockers are preferable to hydrophilic beta-blockers because the pharmacokinetics in elderly people are substantially different. When there is a high risk of thrombo-embolic complications with AF, treatment with coumarin derivatives is advised. However, little research has been done on this subject among elderly people in a general practice setting. In this age group, the risk of complications due to treatment with coumarin derivatives is sometimes higher than the advantages it offers. This is why the GP should always consider carefully whether or not elderly people with AF should be treated with coumarin derivatives.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1986

Paediatric developmental screening: a survey of general practitioners.

A questionnaire survey of 293 general practitioner trainers in England to investigate paediatric screening yielded a response rate of 86%. Paediatric screening sessions were being held by a practice member in the practices of 54% of respondents. In one-third of these practices the practice member was acting in the capacity of clinical medical officer. Of responding trainers 28% held sessions personally and these doctors did not differ significantly from the remainder in terms of sex, seniority, hospital paediatric experience or membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners. About one-third of the doctors holding sessions had spent six months or more working in hospital paediatric departments. First-hand experience of paediatric screening was gained by 60% of the current trainees.Sixty-one per cent of trainers agreed with the view that developmental screening is an appropriate task for all general practitioners, while 71% saw it as an appropriate task for themselves. Eight-six per cent of trainers agreed that doctors should be paid for this service if trained for it, and 56% that they should be paid regardless of training.Comparative figures were determined from a parallel survey of 333 non-training general practitioners of whom 225 (68%) replied. Paediatric screening sessions were held in the practices of 34% of respondents and personally by 21%.It is concluded that there is a high level of interest in paediatric screening among general practitioners, but that there is a need for further expansion in postgraduate paediatric training.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2005

[The practice guideline 'Anxiety disorders' (first revision) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners; a response from the perspective of general practice].

The recommendations provided by the revised guideline 'Anxiety disorders' are well suited to every-day practice. The multidisciplinary approach reflects the increasing cooperation between primary and secondary care in the management of mental-health problems. The description of the various anxiety disorders and the questions that can be asked to elicit the symptoms will facilitate recognition. The indications for treatment with medication are clear: a limited number of antidepressants should be used. Although it is agreed that patient education is an important part of treatment, the guidelines could have described in more detail how this should be done. Cognitive-behavioural techniques may be used but this requires extra training; its effectiveness when used by general practitioners needs further study. This guideline will add to existing knowledge and improve the skills of general practitioners in dealing with anxiety.

Antidepressive Agents↗
PubMed1988

General practitioners and management of infection with HIV.

General practitioners will have an increasingly important role in the management of patients with the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and infections with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as the numbers of cases increase. Altogether 280 general practitioners working in Oxfordshire were sent a postal questionnaire inquiring about their education, knowledge, current practice, and attitudes in relation to managing infections with HIV. Of the 235 (84%) general practitioners who replied, nine out of 10 were giving advice about infection with HIV to their patients. One in two were testing patients for such infection, and one in four were caring for infected patients. Nevertheless, uncertainty remained about the risks of transmission of infection with HIV and general practitioners' knowledge of educational activities for their patients could be improved. The introduction of a facilitator to work with general practitioners in managing patients with AIDS or infection with HIV is planned, especially to help general practitioners develop the skills needed for prevention.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed2004

[The practice guideline 'Hormonal contraception' (second revision) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners; a response from the perspective of general practice].

The second revision of the Dutch College of General Practitioners' practice guideline on hormonal contraception discusses the various methods of hormonal birth control and can help the general practitioner to inform the patient when choosing the most desirable method. A thorough anamnesis is necessary with regard to the increased risks for breast cancer, uterine cancer and cardiovascular diseases in women using hormonal contraception, especially in those who smoke. The guideline also discusses non-hormonal methods briefly.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1995

Patients with urinary tract infection: proposed management strategies of general practitioners, microbiologists and urologists.

BACKGROUND: It is difficult to implement change in general practice. It is not known how best to conduct effective continuing medical education in general practice. General practitioners' criteria for good clinical practice vary and it is unknown whether systematic education by hospital specialists could be expected to reduce variation between general practitioners. AIM: A study was undertaken to describe general practitioners', microbiologists' and urologists' strategies for diagnosis, treatment, and follow up of female patients with symptoms of urinary tract infection, a common reason for consultation in general practice. The findings of the study were to be used as a base upon which to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using hospital specialists as a resource in general practitioners' peer group based continuing medical education. METHOD: Three vignettes together with several proposals for diagnosis, treatment and follow up were presented in a questionnaire to general practitioners, microbiologists and urologists in Denmark. The case histories concerned three female patients (aged 10, 30 and 60 years) who consulted their general practitioner for advice. The female patients were otherwise healthy and well known to the practice. General practitioners', microbiologists' and urologists' recommendations for good clinical practice were compared. RESULTS: A total of 154 general practitioners (77%), 45 microbiologists (51%) and 54 urologists (61%) who were eligible for the study responded to the questionnaire. There was considerable variation in the management strategies proposed by doctors within each specialty and between the specialties. Microbiologists and urologists were more likely to suggest treating the 30-year-old woman by giving advice and a prescription by telephone compared with their general practitioner colleagues. Conversely, the microbiologists and urologists were more likely to suggest asking the 10- and 60-year-old patients to attend the clinic for examination compared with the general practitioners. The general practitioners reported asking the patients to return for follow up more commonly than the hospital specialists. CONCLUSION: Large variation in suggested strategies for diagnosis, treatment and follow up was shown both within and between specialties. Continuing medical education of general practitioners based on small peer group discussions using hospital specialists as a group resource would not necessarily reduce variation in clinical practice between general practitioners. A need for evidence-based rather than consensus-directed guidelines would be needed in order to reduce variation in clinical practice between doctors.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Bacterial contamination of children's toys used in a general practitioner's surgery.

General practitioners--and other healthcare professionals are encouraged to make their premises child friendly. One way of doing this is to provide toys for children to use. We looked at the appearance and bacterial colonisation of 50 toys after a busy morning surgery in an inner city general practice. The toys appeared generally unclean and 10% were contaminated by potential pathogens. Bacteria were cultured more frequently from soft toys than from hard toys (odds ratio 8.14; 95% confidence range 0.74-107.49). Although toys may appear to be physically dirty after use, the bacteria isolated from their surfaces are generally non-pathogenic to children with normal immune function and probably no worse than other objects in the environment. However, there does exist an appreciable (1 in 10) risk of cross-infection with the use of toys in a clinic. Toys with a hard surface are preferred as these are less likely to be contaminated and are more easily disinfected.

Bacteria↗
PubMed2005

[The practice guideline 'The STD consultation' from the Dutch College of General Practitioners; a response from the perspective of general practice].

The new guidelines from the Dutch College of General Practitioners on sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) replace three existing practice guidelines covering a number of sexually transmitted diseases. In the Netherlands the general practitioner treats almost 75% of all patients with an STD. These include patients with symptoms, patients who are worried or anxious, and patients at high risk of an STD. STD-risk assessment should be regarded as a high priority. Chlamydia-infection remains the most prevalent STD. It is easily diagnosed by DNA-diagnostic amplification techniques. The new guidelines recommend more proactive and wider testing. There is much emphasis on counselling, prevention and notifying partners. General practice is the ideal setting for this.

Contact Tracing↗
PubMed1992

Prescribing at the hospital-general practice interface. II: Impact of hospital outpatient dispensing policies in England on general practitioners and hospital consultants.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact on general practitioners and hospital consultants of hospital outpatient dispensing policies in England. DESIGN: Postal questionnaire and telephone interview survey of general practitioners and hospital consultants in January 1991. SETTING: 94 selected major acute hospitals in England. PARTICIPANTS: 20 general practitioners in the vicinity of each of 94 selected hospitals and eight consultants from each, selected by chief pharmacists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportions of general practitioners unable to assume responsibility for specialist drugs and of consultants wishing to retain responsibility; association between dispensing restrictions and the frequency of general practitioners being asked to prescribe hospital initiated treatments. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were obtained from 1207 (64%) of 1887 general practitioners and 457 (63%) of 729 consultants. 570 (46%) general practitioners felt unable to take responsibility for certain treatments, principally because of difficulty in detecting side effects (367, 30%), uncertainty about explaining treatment to patients (332, 28%), and difficulty monitoring dosage (294, 24%). Among consultants 328 (72%) wished to retain responsibility, principally because of specialist need for monitoring (93, 20%), urgent need to commence treatment (64, 14%), and specialist need to initiate or stabilise treatment (63, 14%). The more restricted the drug supply to outpatients, the more frequently consultants asked general practitioners to prescribe (p less than 0.01) and complete a short course of treatment initiated by the hospital (p less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Restrictive hospital outpatient dispensing shifts clinical responsibility on to general practitioners. Hospital doctors should be able to retain responsibility for prescribing when the general practitioner is unfamiliar with the drug or there is a specialist need to initiate, stabilise, or monitor treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2007

Sick notes, general practitioners, emergency departments and fracture clinics.

BACKGROUND: General practitioner waiting times are increasing. The two national surveys regarding general practice showed that the number of patients waiting for >or=2 days for an appointment rose from 63% to 72% between 1998 and 2002, with 25% waiting for >or=4 days. The Department of Health recognised that many patients discharged from hospitals and outpatient clinics required to visit their general practitioner for the sole purpose of obtaining a sick note. The report entitled Making a difference: reducing general practitioner paperwork estimated that 518 000 appointments (and 42 000 GP h) could be saved by ensuring that these patients were issued with a sick note directly from hospital rather than being referred to their general practitioner. This practice was to be adopted from July 2001 and included patients discharged from wards as well as those seen in outpatient departments. METHOD: 50 emergency departments and fracture clinics in Scotland and England were contacted to assess whether these guidelines had been adopted. Only hospitals with both accident and emergency and fracture clinics were included; nurse-led and paediatric departments were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 25 Scottish emergency hospitals contacted, 4 (16%) accident and emergency departments and 8 (32%) fracture clinics issued sick notes. This was compared with 5 of 25 (20%) accident and emergency departments and 12 of 25 (48%) fracture clinics in England. Four Scottish and five English accident and emergency departments stated that it was policy to give sick notes, three Scottish and four English departments said that it was policy not to give them and the rest (72% in Scotland and 64% in England) stated that they had no clear policy but "just don't give them". CONCLUSION: The 2001 guidance from the joint Cabinet Office/Department of Health has not been fully incorporated into standard practice in Scotland and England. If all emergency departments and fracture clinics were to issue sick notes to patients requiring >7 days absence from work, this could reduce general practitioner consultations and improve waiting times.

Emergency Service, Hospital↗
PubMed1998

Deliberate departures from good general practice: a study of motives among Dutch general practitioners.

BACKGROUND: When general practitioners (GPs) act contrary to their own standards of good practice, they usually cite patient demands as the main reason. However, up until now, studies have relied on doctors' recollections of departures from their own norms, which may be unreliable. AIM: To systematically explore GPs' motives for deliberate departures from their own conception of good practice. METHOD: Forty-nine GPs, over five days, registered to what extent they had deviated from their own norms, and recorded the motives underlying any deviation. RESULTS: Of the 6087 consultations registered, 10% contained some departure from 'good' general practice, the majority (75%) of which was perceived by the doctor concerned as 'slight'. Doctors underpinned their departures mostly by referring to the doctor-patient relationship: the wish to be nice was used, on average, in 42% of deviations, and the wish to prevent a conflict in 30%. The most important non-relational motive was clinical uncertainty, which doctors used in 11% of their cases. DISCUSSION: Contrary to common belief, GPs often comply with patient requests because they wish to, and not because they feel forced to. Whether or not this behaviour affects the quality of care is largely dependent on the model of 'good' general practice used.

Family Practice↗
PubMed1993

Dissatisfied patients: improving general practitioners' initial reactions.

General practitioners often have difficulty in dealing with dissatisfied patients. One underlying reason could be the disturbed relationship between the doctor and the dissatisfied patient. A training course has been developed taking the relationship as a starting-point. Based on Watzlawick et al.'s theory on communication GPs have been trained to react to a dissatisfied patient on a relational level ('Are you dissatisfied with my treatment?') rather than on a contents level ('How long have you been suffering from this?'). This method seeks to improve the relationship and the satisfaction of both doctor and patient. Three types of initial reaction to dissatisfied patients were offered to four groups of GPs (19 trainees in general practice and 19 trainers in general practice). Pre- and post-measurement were executed by means of registering the initial reactions on videorecorded vignettes of re-enacted dissatisfied patients. Subsequently the reactions were categorized blind by two judges. The 12 possible categories can be subdivided into categories primarily aimed at the contents or primarily aimed at the relationship. The results show that, as compared to the pre-measurements, GPs more frequently use empathic reactions and reactions in which they bring their own actions up for discussion. The number of responses in which doctors ask a further clinical question or in which GPs expect a solution whether from themselves or from others, decrease. It is concluded that the course appears to change for the better the GPs' initial reaction to dissatisfied patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1989

The role of the general practitioner in the care of mentally disturbed subjects in the general population--results of the Upper Bavarian Study.

The role of the general practitioner in the care of mentally disturbed non-institutionalised persons aged 20 years and older was examined. Data were based on the representative community sample of the Upper Bavarian Field Study with a sample size of 1495 interviewees--aged 20 years and older. The 5-year prevalence of mental illness according to the definition used was 32.8%. 38.5% of all persons, identified as cases, consulted their general practitioner because of psychiatric or emotional problems. Females and the elderly were most likely to have received treatment by their general practitioner. The majority of treated persons were neurotic and psychosomatic patients. The general practitioner provided care for more psychiatric patients than the psychiatrist and for 25% of all "cases", without additional psychiatric consultation.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Acute gastroenteritis diagnostic practices of New Zealand general practitioners.

AIMS: A sample of New Zealand general practitioners was surveyed to determine the laboratory referral practices of general practitioners for patients with acute gastroenteritis, with particular reference to viral gastroenteritis. METHODS: A mail questionnaire was sent to 209 general practitioners throughout New Zealand. RESULTS: The most important criteria for laboratory referral of a diarrhoeal specimen were prolonged duration of illness, presence of blood in the stool, a recent history of overseas travel, tramping or camping, shellfish consumption, or if the patient worked in the food, child care, or health care industries. Most general practitioners reported that they would refer diarrhoeal specimens from less than 25% of their patients with acute gastroenteritis. Requests for testing for viruses other than rotavirus were rare. CONCLUSION: The viral agents causing acute gastroenteritis were less likely to receive laboratory confirmation than other causes of gastroenteritis. On the basis of current laboratory investigation practices of general practitioners, foodborne viral gastroenteritis outbreaks are unlikely to be identified as such in New Zealand.

Acute Disease↗