Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “GPCR”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

ATF-1 mediates protease-activated receptor-1 but not receptor tyrosine kinase-induced DNA synthesis in vascular smooth muscle cells.

Previously we have demonstrated that activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and induction of DNA synthesis in response to receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists require NADH/NADPH-like oxidase activity in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC). Here we tested the role of p38 MAPK in RTK and GPCR agonist-induced DNA synthesis in VSMC. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB and thrombin (RTK and GPCR agonists, respectively) activated p38 MAPK in a time-dependent manner in VSMC. Inhibition of p38 MAPK led to a 50% decrease in the DNA synthesis induced by thrombin but not PDGF-BB. ATF-1 was found to be the predominant member of the cyclic AMP response element (CRE)-DNA complex formed in VSMC in response to PDGF-BB and thrombin, and both agonists induced its phosphorylation. Regardless of this, inhibition of p38 MAPK reduced only thrombin- but not PDGF-BB-induced ATF-1 phosphorylation. Similarly, inhibition of p38 MAPK caused a 50% decrease in thrombin- but not PDGF-BB-induced CRE promoter-dependent transcription. Ectopic expression of an inhibitory anti-ATF-1 single-chain antibody fragment, ScFv, significantly interfered with DNA synthesis induced by thrombin but not PDGF-BB. Together, these results suggest the following conclusions. 1) Both RTK and GPCR agonists activate p38 MAPK and induce CRE promoter-dependent transcription; 2) both RTK and GPCR agonists induce ATF-1 phosphorylation, and ATF-1 is a predominant member in the CRE-DNA complexes formed in response to these agents; and 3) p38 MAPK-dependent ATF-1 phosphorylation and CRE promoter-mediated transcription are associated with GPCR agonist-induced VSMC growth.

Activating Transcription Factor 1↗
PubMed2005

A beta-arrestin binding determinant common to the second intracellular loops of rhodopsin family G protein-coupled receptors.

beta-Arrestins have been shown to inhibit competitively G protein-dependent signaling and to mediate endocytosis for many of the hundreds of nonvisual rhodopsin family G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). An open question of fundamental importance concerning the regulation of signal transduction of several hundred rhodopsin-like GPCRs is how these receptors of limited sequence homology, when considered in toto, can all recruit and activate the two highly conserved beta-arrestin proteins as part of their signaling/desensitization process. Although the serine and threonine residues that form GPCR kinase phosphorylation sites are common beta-arrestin-associated receptor determinants regulating receptor desensitization and internalization, the agonist-activated conformation of a GPCR probably reveals the most fundamental determinant mediating the GPCR and arrestin interaction. Here we identified a beta-arrestin binding determinant common to the rhodopsin family GPCRs formed from the proximal 10 residues of the second intracellular loop. We demonstrated by both gain and loss of function studies for the serotonin 2C, beta2-adrenergic, alpha2a)adrenergic, and neuropeptide Y type 2 receptors that the highly conserved amino acids, proline and alanine, naturally occurring in rhodopsin family receptors six residues distal to the highly conserved second loop DRY motif regulate beta-arrestin binding and beta-arrestin-mediated internalization. In particular, as demonstrated for the beta2 AR, this occurs independently of changes in GPCR kinase phosphorylation. These results suggest that a GPCR conformation directed by the second intracellular loop, likely using the loop itself as a binding patch, may function as a switch for transitioning beta-arrestin from its inactive form to its active receptor-binding state.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2006

Serotonin 5-HT2C receptor homodimer biogenesis in the endoplasmic reticulum: real-time visualization with confocal fluorescence resonance energy transfer.

Dimerization is a common property of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). While the formation of GPCR dimers/oligomers has been reported to play important roles in regulating receptor expression, ligand binding, and second messenger activation, less is known about how and where GPCR dimerization occurs. The present study was performed to identify the precise cellular compartment in which class A GPCR dimer/oligomer biogenesis occurs. We addressed this issue using confocal microscopy and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) to monitor GPCR proximity within discrete intracellular compartments of intact living cells. Time-lapse confocal imaging was used to follow CFP- and YFP-tagged serotonin 5-HT2C receptors during biosynthesis in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), trafficking through the Golgi apparatus and subsequent expression on the plasma membrane. Real-time monitoring of FRET between CFP- and YFP-tagged 5-HT2C receptors was performed by acceptor photobleaching within discrete regions of the ER, Golgi, and plasma membrane. The FRET signal was dependent on the ratio of CFP- to YFP-tagged 5-HT2C receptors expressed in each region and was independent of receptor expression level, as predicted for proteins in a non-random, clustered distribution. FRET efficiencies measured in the ER, Golgi, and plasma membrane were similar. These experiments provide direct evidence for homodimerization/oligomerization of class A GPCR in the ER and Golgi of intact living cells, and suggest that dimer/oligomer formation is a naturally occurring step in 5-HT2C receptor maturation and processing.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1998

Human interferon-gamma-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) inhibits constitutive signaling of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus G protein-coupled receptor.

A G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) is encoded within the genome of Kaposi's sarcoma- associated herpesvirus (KSHV)/human herpesvirus 8, a virus that may be involved in the pathogenesis of Kaposi's sarcoma and primary effusion lymphomas. KSHV-GPCR exhibits constitutive signaling activity that causes oncogenic transformation. We report that human interferon (IFN)-gamma-inducible protein 10 (HuIP-10), a C-X-C chemokine, specifically inhibits signaling of KSHV-GPCR. In contrast, monokine induced by IFN-gamma (HuMig), which like HuIP-10 is an agonist of C-X-C chemokine receptor 3, does not inhibit KSHV-GPCR signaling. Moreover, HuIP-10, but not HuMig, inhibits KSHV-GPCR-induced proliferation of NIH 3T3 cells. These results show that HuIP-10 is an inverse agonist that converts KSHV-GPCR from an active to an inactive state. Thus, a human chemokine inhibits constitutive signaling and cellular proliferation that is mediated by a receptor encoded by a human disease-associated herpesvirus.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2004

GIPC recruits GAIP (RGS19) to attenuate dopamine D2 receptor signaling.

Pleiotropic G proteins are essential for the action of hormones and neurotransmitters and are activated by stimulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), which initiates heterotrimer dissociation of the G protein, exchange of GDP for GTP on its Galpha subunit and activation of effector proteins. Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins regulate this cascade and can be recruited to the membrane upon GPCR activation. Direct functional interaction between RGS and GPCR has been hypothesized. We show that recruitment of GAIP (RGS19) by the dopamine D2 receptor (D2R), a GPCR, required the scaffold protein GIPC (GAIP-interacting protein, C terminus) and that all three were coexpressed in neurons and neuroendocrine cells. Dynamic translocation of GAIP to the plasma membrane and coassembly in a protein complex in which GIPC was a required component was dictated by D2R activation and physical interactions. In addition, two different D2R-mediated responses were regulated by the GTPase activity of GAIP at the level of the G protein coupling in a GIPC-dependent manner. Since GIPC exclusively interacted with GAIP and selectively with subsets of GPCR, this mechanism may serve to sort GPCR signaling in cells that usually express a large repertoire of GPCRs, G proteins, and RGS.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed2007

Pharmacogenomic and structural analysis of constitutive g protein-coupled receptor activity.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) respond to a chemically diverse plethora of signal transduction molecules. The notion that GPCRs also signal without an external chemical trigger, i.e., in a constitutive or spontaneous manner, resulted in a paradigm shift in the field of GPCR pharmacology. The discovery of constitutive GPCR activity and the fact that GPCR binding and signaling can be strongly affected by a single point mutation drew attention to the evolving area of GPCR pharmacogenomics. For a variety of GPCRs, point mutations have been convincingly linked to human disease. Mutations within conserved motifs, known to be involved in GPCR activation, might explain the properties of some naturally occurring, constitutively active GPCR variants linked to disease. In this review, we provide a brief historical introduction to the concept of constitutive receptor activity and the pharmacogenomic and structural aspects of constitutive receptor activity.

Humans↗
PubMed1998

G protein-coupled receptors: functional and mechanistic insights through altered gene expression.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise a large and diverse family of molecules that play essential roles in signal transduction. In addition to a constantly expanding pharmacological repertoire, recent advances in the ability to manipulate GPCR expression in vivo have provided another valuable approach in the study of GPCR function and mechanism of action. Current technologies now allow investigators to manipulate GPCR expression in a variety of ways. Graded reductions in GPCR expression can be achieved through antisense strategies or total gene ablation or replacement can be achieved through gene targeting strategies, and exogenous expression of wild-type or mutant GPCR isoforms can be accomplished with transgenic technologies. Both the techniques used to achieve these specific alterations and the consequences of altered expression patterns are reviewed here and discussed in the context of GPCR function and mechanism of action.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Expression of terminally glycosylated calcitonin receptor-like receptor in uterine leiomyoma: endothelial phenotype and association with microvascular density.

PURPOSE: The role for the hypoxia-inducible angiogenic factor adrenomedullin (AM) in tumor growth and progression has been suggested. Calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CL) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that mediates effects of AM, but little information is available on its expression and functional state in human tumors. The present study attempted to determine CL potential for antiangiogenic therapy of uterine leiomyoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND RESULTS: GPCR CL is transported to the cell surface and recognized by AM only when terminally/mature glycosylated. The presence and localization of this form of the receptor in tumor and surrounding myometrial tissues obtained from leiomyoma-bearing uteri were examined using deglycosylation, immunoblotting, and immunofluorescence analysis. The mature CL glycoprotein was expressed in both tissues and localized exclusively in normal and tumor endothelium within leiomyoma-bearing uteri. The functionality of the receptor expressed in myometrial microvascular endothelial cells (MMVEC) was examined in vitro using receptor internalization and angiogenic assays. The mature CL glycoprotein expressed by primary MMVECs was functional because AM interacted with this GPCR and induced its internalization as well as angiogenic effects (proliferation and migration) in MMVECs in vitro. Finally, the levels of tissue-expressed mature CL glycoprotein as a functional form of this GPCR were analyzed by immunoblotting. The expression of this functional form of the receptor in vivo was significantly decreased (P = 0.01) in leiomyoma tissue, and this was concurrent with the decrease in microvascular density (measured by Chalkley counting) in tumor compared with surrounding myometrium (P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that GPCR CL mediates angiogenic effects of AM in myometrium and that further evaluation of the properties of the CL expressed in both normal and tumor endothelium in vivo may be essential before targeting this endothelial GPCR for antiangiogenic therapies.

Adrenomedullin↗
PubMed2006

Structure modeling of all identified G protein-coupled receptors in the human genome.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), encoded by about 5% of human genes, comprise the largest family of integral membrane proteins and act as cell surface receptors responsible for the transduction of endogenous signal into a cellular response. Although tertiary structural information is crucial for function annotation and drug design, there are few experimentally determined GPCR structures. To address this issue, we employ the recently developed threading assembly refinement (TASSER) method to generate structure predictions for all 907 putative GPCRs in the human genome. Unlike traditional homology modeling approaches, TASSER modeling does not require solved homologous template structures; moreover, it often refines the structures closer to native. These features are essential for the comprehensive modeling of all human GPCRs when close homologous templates are absent. Based on a benchmarked confidence score, approximately 820 predicted models should have the correct folds. The majority of GPCR models share the characteristic seven-transmembrane helix topology, but 45 ORFs are predicted to have different structures. This is due to GPCR fragments that are predominantly from extracellular or intracellular domains as well as database annotation errors. Our preliminary validation includes the automated modeling of bovine rhodopsin, the only solved GPCR in the Protein Data Bank. With homologous templates excluded, the final model built by TASSER has a global C(alpha) root-mean-squared deviation from native of 4.6 angstroms, with a root-mean-squared deviation in the transmembrane helix region of 2.1 angstroms. Models of several representative GPCRs are compared with mutagenesis and affinity labeling data, and consistent agreement is demonstrated. Structure clustering of the predicted models shows that GPCRs with similar structures tend to belong to a similar functional class even when their sequences are diverse. These results demonstrate the usefulness and robustness of the in silico models for GPCR functional analysis. All predicted GPCR models are freely available for noncommercial users on our Web site (http://www.bioinformatics.buffalo.edu/GPCR).

Algorithms↗
PubMed2002

Constitutive activity of G-protein coupled receptors: emphasis on serotonin receptors.

Several lines of evidence indicate that G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) may exist in a state that allows a tonic level of stimulation in vivo (constitutive activity). Several native forms of GPCR, when expressed in recombinant cell lines, display significant signal transduction stimulation in the absence of activating ligand. Many GPCR, including three serotonin receptors, display robust constitutive activation upon the mutation of a single amino acid, indicating mutations producing inappropriate constitutive activation may be etiological factors in diseases. If constitutive activity of GPCR is as common a phenomenon as some researchers suspect, this would suggest significant alterations in the classical model of ligand-receptor interactions. One of the most significant implications of constitutive activity for pharmacologists and medicinal chemists, is the possibility of developing drugs that lower the level of constitutive activity. Such compounds have been termed inverse agonists . These drugs, in theory, would have different physiological effects, and therefore possibly different therapeutic potential, than classical competitive receptor antagonists ( neutral antagonists ). Theoretical issues concerning constitutive activity in the GPCR family and some of the evidence supporting the existence of constitutive activity in the GPCR family is reviewed. Studies are presented demonstrating the procedures for producing and characterizing constitutive activated forms of serotonin receptors, including the demonstration of inverse agonist activity of drugs on these receptors.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Point mutation causing constitutive signaling of CXCR2 leads to transforming activity similar to Kaposi's sarcoma herpesvirus-G protein-coupled receptor.

The chemokine receptor CXCR2 is the closest homologue to Kaposi's sarcoma herpesvirus-G protein-coupled receptor (KSHV-GPCR), which is known to be constitutively activated and able to cause oncogenic transformation. Among G protein-coupled receptors, a DRY sequence in the second intracellular loop is highly conserved. However, the KSHV-GPCR shows a VRY sequence instead. In this study, we exchanged Asp138 of the DRY sequence in the CXCR2 with a Val (D138V), the corresponding amino acid in KSHV-GPCR, or with a Gln (D138Q), and investigated the functional consequences of these mutations. In focus formation and soft agar growth assays in NIH 3T3 cells, the D138V mutant exhibited transforming potential similar to the KSHV-GPCR. Surprisingly, the CXCR2 wild type itself showed transforming activity, although not as potently, due to continuous autocrine stimulation, whereas the D138Q mutant formed no foci. In agreement with these results were high levels of inositol phosphate accumulation in the D138V mutant and the KSHV-GPCR, indicating constitutive activity. These data emphasize the importance of the DRY sequence for G protein-coupled signaling of the CXCR2. Either constitutive activation or persistent autocrine stimulation of the CXCR2 causes transformation similar to KSHV-GPCR-transfected cells, probably activating the same signal transduction cascade that can abrogate normal growth control mechanisms.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2001

Evolving concepts in G protein-coupled receptor endocytosis: the role in receptor desensitization and signaling.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are seven transmembrane proteins that form the largest single family of integral membrane receptors. GPCRs transduce information provided by extracellular stimuli into intracellular second messengers via their coupling to heterotrimeric G proteins and the subsequent regulation of a diverse variety of effector systems. Agonist activation of GPCRs also initiates processes that are involved in the feedback desensitization of GPCR responsiveness, the internalization of GPCRs, and the coupling of GPCRs to heterotrimeric G protein-independent signal transduction pathways. GPCR desensitization occurs as a consequence of G protein uncoupling in response to phosphorylation by both second messenger-dependent protein kinases and G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation promotes the binding of beta-arrestins, which not only uncouple receptors from heterotrimeric G proteins but also target many GPCRs for internalization in clathrin-coated vesicles. beta-Arrestin-dependent endocytosis of GPCRs involves the direct interaction of the carboxyl-terminal tail domain of beta-arrestins with both beta-adaptin and clathrin. The focus of this review is the current and evolving understanding of the contribution of GRKs, beta-arrestins, and endocytosis to GPCR-specific patterns of desensitization and resensitization. In addition to their role as GPCR-specific endocytic adaptor proteins, beta-arrestins also serve as molecular scaffolds that foster the formation of alternative, heterotrimeric G protein-independent signal transduction complexes. Similar to what is observed for GPCR desensitization and resensitization, beta-arrestin-dependent GPCR internalization is involved in the intracellular compartmentalization of these protein complexes.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

The Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus G protein-coupled receptor promotes endothelial cell survival through the activation of Akt/protein kinase B.

The Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus G protein-coupled receptor (KSHV-GPCR) is a key molecule in the pathogenesis of Kaposi's sarcoma, playing a central role in the promotion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-driven angiogenesis and spindle cell proliferation. We previously have shown that KSHV-GPCR has oncogenic potential when overexpressed in fibroblasts and is responsible for the expression and secretion of VEGF through the regulation of different intracellular signaling pathways (A. Sodhi et al., Cancer Res., 60: 4873-4880, 2000; C. Bais et al., Nature, 391: 86-89, 1998). Here, we describe that this constitutively active G protein-coupled receptor is able to promote cell survival in primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells and that this effect is independent of its ability to secrete VEGF because it is not prevented by the expression of antisense constructs for VEGF or the addition of VEGF-blocking antibodies. Instead we found that ectopic expression of KSHV-GPCR potently induces the kinase activity of Akt/protein kinase B in a dose-dependent manner and triggers its translocation to the plasma membrane. This signaling pathway requires the function of phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase and is dependent on betagamma subunits released from both pertussis toxin-sensitive and -insensitive G proteins. Furthermore, we found that KSHV-GPCR is able to protect human umbilical vein endothelial cells from the apoptosis induced by serum deprivation and that both wortmannin and the expression of a kinase-deficient Akt K179M mutant are able to block this effect. Finally, we observed that the Akt K179M protein also inhibits the activation of nuclear factor-KB induced by KSHV-GPCR, suggesting that this transcription factor may represent one of the putative downstream targets for Akt in the survival-signaling pathway. These results provide further knowledge in the elucidation of the signal transduction pathways activated by KSHV-GPCR and support its key role in promoting the survival of viral-infected cells. Moreover, the present findings also emphasize the importance of this G protein-coupled receptor in the development of KSHV-related neoplasias.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Functional differences between full and partial agonists: evidence for ligand-specific receptor conformations.

The interaction of an agonist-bound G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) with its cognate G-protein initiates a sequence of experimentally quantifiable changes in both the GPCR and G-protein. These include the release of GDP from G(alpha), the formation of a ternary complex between the nucleotide-free G-protein and the GPCR, which has a high affinity for agonist, followed by the binding of GTP to G(alpha), the dissociation of the GPCR/G-protein complex, and the hydrolysis of GTP. The efficacy of an agonist is a measure of its ability to activate this cascade. It has been proposed that efficacy reflects the ability of the agonist to stabilize the active state of the GPCR. We examined a series of beta(2)-adrenoceptor (beta(2)AR) agonists (weak partial agonists to full agonists) for their efficacy at promoting two different steps of the G-protein activation/deactivation cycle: stabilizing the ternary complex (high-affinity, GTP-sensitive agonist binding), and steady-state GTPase activity. We obtained results for the wild-type beta(2)AR and a constitutively active mutant of the beta(2)AR (beta(2)AR(CAM)) using fusion proteins between the GPCRs and G(salpha) to facilitate GPCR/G-protein interactions. There was no correlation between efficacy of ligands in activating GTPase and their ability to stabilize the ternary complex at beta(2)AR(CAM). Our results suggest that the GPCR state that optimally promotes the GDP release and GTP binding is different from the GPCR state that stabilizes the ternary complex. By strongly stabilizing the ternary complex, certain partial agonists may reduce the rate of G-protein turnover relative to a full agonist.

Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists↗
PubMed2005

T cell homeostasis requires G protein-coupled receptor-mediated access to trophic signals that promote growth and inhibit chemotaxis.

Signals that regulate T cell homeostasis are not fully understood. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), such as the chemokine receptors, may affect homeostasis by direct signaling or by guiding T cell migration to distinct location-restricted signals. Here, we show that blockade of Galphai-associated GPCR signaling by treatment with pertussis toxin led to T cell atrophy and shortened life-span in T cell-replete hosts and prevented T cell homeostatic growth and proliferation in T cell-deficient hosts. In vitro, however, neither GPCR inhibition nor chemokine stimulation affected T cell atrophy, survival, or proliferation. These findings suggest that GPCR signals are not trophic stimuli, but instead may be required for migration to distinct trophic signals, such as IL-7 or self-peptide/MHC. Surprisingly, while chemokines did not affect atrophy, atrophic T cells displayed increased chemokine-induced chemotaxis that was prevented by IL-7 and submitogenic anti-CD3 antibody treatment. This increase in migration was associated with increased levels of GTP-bound Rac and the ability to remodel actin. These data suggest a novel mechanism of T cell homeostasis wherein GPCR may promote T cell migration to distinct location-restricted homeostatic trophic cues for T cell survival and growth. Homeostatic trophic signals, in turn, may suppress chemokine sensitivity and cytoskeletal remodeling, to inhibit further migration.

Actins↗
PubMed2004

Sphingosine 1-phosphate and its G protein-coupled receptors constitute a multifunctional immunoregulatory system.

The lysophospholipid growth factors sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) are generated by many cells involved in immunity, including macrophages, dendritic cells, mast cells, and platelets, with resultant lymph and plasma concentrations of 0.1-1 microM. All immune cells express distinctive profiles of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) for S1P and LPA, which are regulated developmentally and by cellular activation. For T-cells, constitutive S1P signaling through their principal S1P(1) GPCR inhibits chemotactic responses to chemokines, with lesser suppression of proliferation and cytokine production. These S1P-S1P(1) GPCR signals tonically reduce T-cell chemotactic sensitivity to chemokines and thereby limit homing of blood and spleen T-cells to secondary lymphoid tissues. S1P(1) GPCR antagonists evoke lymphopenia by permitting blood T-cells to enter lymph nodes and blocking S1P(1) GPCR-dependent T-cell efflux from lymph nodes. Inversely, there is a longer than normal persistance in blood and a decrease in lymphoid transit time for T-cells overexpressing transgenic S1P(1) GPCRs. The immunotherapeutic potential of S1P(1) GPCR antagonists derives from their capacity to limit T-cell access to organ grafts and autoimmune antigens without reducing their other intrinsic functional capabilities. Lysophospholipids and their GPCRs thus constitute an immunoregulatory system of sufficient prominence for pharmacological targeting in transplantation, autoimmunity and immunodeficiency.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) chemokine vMIP-II and human SDF-1alpha inhibit signaling by KSHV G protein-coupled receptor.

Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) encodes two proteins that are similar to human CC chemokines and a G protein-coupled receptor (KSHV-GPCR) that is constitutively active. KSHV-GPCR binds a number of human CXC and CC chemokines. We showed that interferon gamma-inducible protein-10 (IP-10), a human CXC chemokine, inhibits KSHV-GPCR signaling (Geras-Raaka et al., J. Exp. Med. 188, 405-408, 1998). Here we show that viral monocyte inflammatory protein-II (vMIP-II), one of the KSHV-encoded CC chemokines, and stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha (SDF-1alpha), a human CXC chemokine that blocks infection by human immunodeficiency virus-type 1, inhibit KSHV-GPCR signaling also. If KSHV-GPCR signaling is involved in viral pathogenesis, then these chemokines may affect the course of Kaposi's sarcoma and primary effusion lymphoma.

Chemokine CXCL12↗
PubMed1999

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) 1 and 16 are induced in response to bacterial lipopolysaccharide and stimulate c-fos promoter expression.

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) are negative regulators of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. Sepsis is a pathophysiological condition that is induced primarily in response to bacterial infection and is associated with decreased responsiveness to a number of vasoactive GPCR agonists. Using a degenerate RT-PCR screen, we report that RGS1 and RGS16 were amplified from the heart and aorta of septic animals. By Northern blot analysis, RGS1 and RGS16 were upregulated, with their respective levels increasing 6- and 50-fold in septic hearts. Using a yeast-based bioassay, both RGS1 and RGS16 were found to be equipotent in their ability to attenuate GPCR signaling. These results suggest that both RGS1 and RGS16 contribute to the sepsis-mediated decrease in GPCR signaling. Elevated levels of some RGSs may also lead to an increase in Gbetagamma-activated signaling pathways in the absence of GPCR agonists. Using a c-fos luciferase reporter gene that is responsive to Gbetagamma-activated signaling pathways, we observed a respective 8- and 7-fold increase in the basal luciferase in serum-deprived transfected mammalian cells overexpressing RGS1 or RGS16. This suggests that RGSs play a role in promoting the sepsis-mediated increases in the activation of intracellular signal transduction pathways.

Amino Acid Sequence↗