Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Fraud”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources

Scientific misconduct. How prevalent is fraud? That's a million-dollar question.

How often does scientific misconduct occur? There seems to be no consensus on the answer, although a range of estimates were presented at a conference called last month by a key federal watchdog agency to announce a $1 million grants program to investigate the prevalence of fraud, data fabrication, plagiarism, and other questionable practices in science. The 8-year-old Office of Research Integrity hopes to support studies gauging the frequency of misconduct and assessing efforts to raise ethical standards.

Behavioral Research↗

Research fraud: issues of which practitioners should be aware.

Treatment and care given to patients should be evidence-based, but research results based on fraudulent findings can have a serious impact on care. This paper examines how fraud may be perpetuated and discusses standards for robust research.

Authorship↗

Health education: a boon to humanity or a fantasy and fraud?

The health education profession in the United States has been influenced by three major forces in recent years: sociomedical phenomena resulting in a public demand for health education, disease specificity of the practice of health education, and the process of professional credentialing. While these three forces are looked upon by many as beneficial to the profession, they also pose significant threats to the viability of the profession. Health educators must deal with these threats if the health education profession is to significantly benefit humanity. Otherwise, the profession may be ultimately perceived as a fantasy and fraud.

Credentialing↗

[Self-mutilating hand and finger injuries among physicians suspected of insurance fraud].

27 cases of questionable self-mutilation among physicians (concerning finger and hand injuries) were analyzed retrospectively. The evaluation based on files of the insurance companies, reconstructive examinations and experimental investigations. Three typical cases are described in detail, the "victims" were suspected to have committed a special kind of fraud in order to claim financial compensation from their accident-insurance companies; the contract included special invalidity payments for finger injures (so-called "Gliedertaxe"). Many of these physicians had worked in the surgical field: apart from one 38-year-old female all of them were males, aged between 41 and 66 years. The mutilating instruments were often circular saws, sometimes chain saws and a great variety of other tools, for example hatchet, big scissors and other sharp instruments. By means of forensic-medical expertise and criminalistic investigations the insurance companies were able to demonstrate clearly that the amputation was voluntarily self-inflicted. The forensic-medical argumentation concerning intentional self-mutilation included the so-called execution position of the finger, the injury pattern, the investigations of blood stains and ergonometric aspects.

Adult↗

Fraud and abuse law.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Disclosure↗

[Self-mutilation as insurance fraud].

The case of a self-amputation of the left-sided forefinger is presented. It was an isolated smooth amputation near the basic ankle of the finger without any accompanying injury of other fingers. The victim (a physician) claimed financial compensation from his accident-insurance; his contract included special disability taxes for finger injuries. However, the insurance company did not pay but was able to demonstrate--by means of a medico-legal reconstructive expertise--that the amputation was voluntary and self-inflicted. The argumentation concerning self-mutilation is presented (including the so-called execution-position of the finger and ergonometric aspects). Concerning the surgical care, intervention and diagnostic procedures a detailed documentation of the case history and the morphology of the injury pattern are recommended (especially in isolated finger-amputations of the non-working hand.

Aged↗