Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Elbow Prosthesis”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources
PubMed1986

Management of the upper-limb-deficient child with a powered prosthetic device.

A long-term survey of a large number of children fitted with an electrically powered upper-limb prosthesis seems not to have been reported in the literature. Children with upper-limb deficiencies (congenital or traumatic) were fitted with an electrically powered upper-limb prosthesis in Ontario during the 18-year period of 1965-1983. Seventy-eight patients responded to a questionnaire or were interviewed by telephone. The dropout rate in children with a below-elbow amputation was similar to that reported in below-elbow child amputees wearing a conventional body-powered prosthesis (10% vs. 13%). The acceptance rate in children with above-elbow amputations was higher in those wearing an electrically powered prosthesis than in those using the conventional prosthesis, testifying for improved prosthetic function in the former group.

Amputation, Traumatic↗
PubMed2002

Revisions for aseptic loosening in Souter-Strathclyde elbow arthroplasty: incidence of revisions of different components used in 522 consecutive cases.

We present the prosthesis survival of the 7 most commonly used component types of 522 primary Souter elbow replacements performed in the Rheumatism Foundation Hospital during the years 1982-1997. The cohort comprised 370 female and 33 male patients with a mean age of 57 (20-81) years. 119 patients had a bilateral procedure. The indications for operation in all cases were rheumatoid arthritis and other chronic inflammatory joint disease. The mean duration of the disease at the time of operation was 25 (2-70) years. Elbows were often severely destroyed and, in one thiird of the joints, essential bone structures were missing. Therefore, in 178 cases, the ulnar components were retentive and in the remaining 344 elbows with better bone stock non-retentive. 47 patients had 51 operations for aseptic loosening up to the end of year 2000. In the survival analysis, the general cumulative success rates for the whole study cohort, without revision because of aseptic loosening 5 and10 years after surgery, were 96% and 84%, respectively. Revision was used as an end point. Cumulative success rates of the 7 most commonly used components are presented separately. The highest 5-year-survival rate was 100%, the lowest 93%. The corresponding 10-year-survival rates were 91% and 76%, respectively.

Adult↗
PubMed2007

Midterm results of revision total elbow arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiographic results of 30 revision total elbow arthroplasties in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using original surface prostheses developed in our institution. We asked whether a surface prosthesis is a suitable option for reconstructing a failed surface total elbow arthroplasty in terms of reproducing clinical performance compared with other devices such as semiconstrained prostheses. All 30 failed total elbow arthroplasties were performed with various surface prostheses and revised with Dogo Onsen Hospital surface prostheses. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 64.9 years (range, 44-83 years), and the minimum followup was 3 years (mean 6.7 years; range, 3-11 years). The Mayo elbow performance index improved from 42.3 preoperatively to 76.3 at last followup. Pain, stability, and function scores improved after revision surgery, but range of motion scores were unchanged. Our data indicate a surface prosthesis is a reasonable option for reconstructing failed surface total elbow arthroplasties in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Prosthetic radial head components and proximal radial morphology: a mismatch.

A morphometric study of the proximal radius was performed with magnetic resonance imaging scans to measure the anatomic dimensions of the radial head and neck. These dimensions were then compared with the manufacturer's size specifications of commercially available titanium prosthetic radial head components to determine whether these designs adequately match the morphologic characteristics of the proximal radius. A cadaveric correlation was performed to validate the accuracy and reliability of measurements obtained from the magnetic resonance scans. The narrow intramedullary dimensions of the radial neck negated fitting of even the smallest available metallic prosthetic component stem in 18 (39%) of 46 scans reviewed (confidence interval 26% to 53%). Of the 31 male patients who underwent scanning, 4 (13%) would not be able to be fitted with a prosthetic component according to the manufacturer's technique guide (confidence interval 0% to 29%). Of the 15 female patients who underwent scanning, 14 (93%) would not able to be fitted with a prosthetic stem (confidence interval 70% to 99%). In those patients in whom the radial neck could accommodate a prosthetic stem (n = 26), there was ineffective restoration of proximal radial head length in all cases (100%, confidence interval 87% to 100%). The average shortening was 4 mm of proximal radial length (range 1 to 7 mm). Our findings reveal that the commercially available metallic radial head design may overestimate the dimensions of the radial neck. Inadequate sizing of radial head prostheses may lead to an inadvertent change in proximal radial length, with potentially adverse effects on elbow, forearm, and wrist mechanics. Newer designs taking into account these anatomic dimensions may lead to an improvement in function after reconstruction.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Soft tissue reconstruction of megaprostheses using a trevira tube.

In soft tissue reconstruction of megaprostheses, the reattachment of soft tissue and joint capsules is essential. Sixty-nine megaprostheses were implanted and a trevira tube was applied to support reconstruction of the capsule and soft tissue. In cases of proximal femur replacement (33 patients), total femur replacement (five patients), and proximal humerus replacement (16 patients), the trevira tube allowed for reconstruction of the capsule and refixation of the muscles and helped to minimize dislocation. In cases of proximal tibia replacement (seven patients), arthrodesis of the knee (three patients), total knee replacement (two patients), and distal femur replacement (three patients), the trevira tube allowed for attachment of muscle flaps and extensor apparatus. Dislocation was observed in two of 54 patients who had proximal femur replacements. No dislocation was observed in patients with a total femur endoprosthesis or a proximal humerus endoprosthesis. The trevira tube also was used to attach the gastrocnemius muscle in patients with a proximal tibia endoprosthesis and to reattach the rotator cuff in patients with a proximal humerus prosthesis. There was no significant increase in the rate of infection. The histopathologic findings in six patients showed tissue ingrowth into the tube.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Which primary shoulder and elbow replacement? A review of the results of prostheses available in the UK.

To assist surgeons select a suitable prosthesis, we have undertaken a detailed review of all shoulder and elbow replacements currently marketed in the UK. Twenty shoulder and 8 elbow implants, manufactured by 16 companies, have been identified. Twelve of the shoulder and one of the elbow implants have been introduced or modified in the last 8 years and have no clinical results published in peer-reviewed journals. Only the Biomodular, Bipolar, Copeland, Isoelastic, Neer hemi, Neer II, Roper-Day and Select shoulders accounting for less than 40% of the UK shoulder market, possess published results. The Capitello-condylar, Coonrad-Morrey, GSB III, Kudo, Liverpool, Roper-Tuke and Souter-Strathclyde elbows all have published results. These account for over 95% of all UK elbow replacements. The implications of these findings in an era of evidence-based medicine is discussed. Reviewing the clinical results should be of primary importance in the selection of a suitable prosthesis. Implants with a proven long-term record must represent the 'gold standard'. New or modified implants should only be used if they are part of a properly conducted clinical trial.

Arthroplasty, Replacement↗
PubMed2006

Impact of prostheses on function and quality of life for children with unilateral congenital below-the-elbow deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Children with unilateral congenital below-the-elbow deficiency present a dilemma to clinicians. Parents want the child to have a prosthesis and, because it seems that the deficiency will cause functional problems, one is customarily prescribed for infants. Use of the prosthesis is then encouraged throughout childhood. However, these children frequently abandon the prosthesis. There are no evidence-based guidelines regarding prescription of prostheses or standard methods for assessing use and function. METHODS: A multicenter outcomes study was done to assess the quality of life and function of 489 children with a unilateral congenital below-the-elbow deficiency; 321 wore a prosthesis, and 168 did not. The Unilateral Below-the-Elbow Test (UBET) was designed, validated, and administered to these children along with several outcomes measures, including the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI), the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), and the Prosthetic Upper Extremity Functional Index (PUFI). RESULTS: Use of a prosthesis was not associated with any clinically relevant differences in PODCI or PedsQL scores. Non-wearers performed either the same as or better than wearers on the UBET. When queried (with use of the PUFI) about performance of various tasks, non-wearers scored themselves higher than wearers. Children with a unilateral congenital below-the-elbow deficiency scored the same as or higher than the general population on the PedsQL. They scored significantly lower than the general population on the PODCI Upper Extremity Physical Function Domain and higher on the Happiness Domain, but the differences were small. CONCLUSIONS: Prostheses may help with social acceptance or may be useful as tools for specialized activities, but they do not appear to improve function or quality of life, which are nearly normal for children with unilateral congenital below-the-elbow deficiency regardless of whether they wear a prosthesis. These findings call into question the standard practices of fitting infants with prostheses and encouraging young children to wear the prosthesis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Current concepts in the treatment of radial head fractures in the adult. A clinical and biomechanical approach.

The treatment of simple radial head fractures type Mason-Hotchkiss 1 and 2 is unequivocal. In the case of a displacement of less than 2 mm (Mason-Hotchkiss 1), functional conservative treatment is indicated. If the displacement is more than 2 mm (Mason-Hotchkiss 2) internal fixation is indicated, combined with treatment of the soft-tissue injuries. The treatment of comminuted radial head fractures Mason-Hotchkiss type 3 is more controversial, as they are usually associated with ligament injuries. Conservative treatment appears to have unsatisfactory results. Opinions differ on surgical treatment, i.e. 1) excision of the radial head; 2) reconstruction by means of internal fixation; 3) excision and reconstruction with a prosthesis. Basic experimental research on human cadaver elbows shows the importance of the conservation of the radial head, especially in case of associated soft tissue injuries. In most cases a stable osteosynthesis is impossible, and in case of associated ligament disruptions, resection and reconstruction by means of a rigid radial head prosthesis should be considered. Experimental research demonstrates promising results for rigid radial head prostheses in human cadaver elbows with a resected radial head and failing medical collateral ligament. Short-term clinical studies seem to confirm this, but long-term results are as yet unknown.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed1981

Functional effectiveness of a myo-electric prosthesis compared with a functional split-hook prosthesis: a single subject experiment.

The functional effectiveness of a myo-electric prosthesis with sensory feedback compared with that of a split-hook is described. Thirty independent observations were made on a single subject with a right below-elbow amputation wearing the myo-electric prosthesis and the split-hook prosthesis. Using a first order autoregressive model for making inferences about the two sets of data, the split-hook was found to be functionally better (p less than 0.001) than the myo-electric prosthesis. Functional effectiveness was defined operationally as scores on the Minnesota Rate of Manipulation Placing Test and the Smith Test of Hand Function. No predictions are made regarding the use of either prosthesis for other amputees. However clinical evidence suggested suitability of the myo-electric prosthesis with sensory feedback for some other functional tasks.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Management of Mason type-III radial head fractures with a titanium prosthesis, ligament repair, and early mobilization.

BACKGROUND: Radial head fractures often occur in association with other elbow fractures and soft-tissue injuries. Radial head replacement is indicated for irreparable radial head fractures associated with elbow instability. The purpose of this study was to analyze the results after treatment of such injuries with a titanium radial head prosthesis, repair of torn collateral ligaments, and early mobilization of the elbow. METHODS: Sixteen patients with sixteen Mason type-III radial head fractures and collateral ligament injury were treated with use of a titanium radial head prosthesis over a five-year period at the Royal Adelaide Hospital and Modbury Public Hospital in South Australia. The surgery was performed acutely in ten patients and was delayed an average of thirty-seven days (range, fifteen to seventy-nine days) in six. All patients were followed clinically and radiographically for a mean of 2.8 years (range, 1.2 to 4.3 years). RESULTS: Eight patients had an excellent result; five, a good result; and three, a fair result, according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. The three fair results occurred in patients with delayed surgery. The mean flexion contracture was 15 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 42 degrees ), with an average loss of 10 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 25 degrees ) of full flexion compared with that of the contralateral elbow. Both pronation and supination decreased an average of 12 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 45 degrees ) compared with that of the contralateral forearm. CONCLUSIONS: The results of treatment of Mason type-III radial head fractures with a monoblock titanium radial head prosthesis and soft-tissue reconstruction are satisfactory. Early mobilization of the elbow is important for the restoration of elbow range of motion and function.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Prosthetic use in patients with burns and associated limb amputations.

A review of 11 patients who sustained burns that were complicated by limb amputation was completed to determine their eventual ability to use prosthesis. Amputations included six below-elbow, four above-elbow, three below-knee, and three above-knee amputations. Ten of the 11 patients (91%) had open wounds on the stump limbs and nine patients (82%) required skin grafting procedures on the amputated limbs. Delays in prosthetic fitting because of continued surgeries, open wounds, skin grafts on the stump limb, and breakdown of the stump were identified. However, eight of these patients (73%) were eventually able to wear prosthetic devices. Fisher's exact test was used to test the influence of the number and site of the amputations and skin grafting on the stump on successful prosthesis use. None of these tested items were found to be significant. The results demonstrate that most patients with burns who require limb amputation can achieve successful prosthesis use.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Total elbow arthroplasty in the treatment of posttraumatic conditions of the elbow.

Posttraumatic arthritis, arthritis secondary to instability, and nonunion or malunion about the elbow may be treated by various methods. Recommended first-line treatment in the younger, more active patient population is nonprosthetic techniques. Total elbow arthroplasty should be considered primarily as a salvage procedure for these patients. Careful patient selection will determine whether total elbow arthroplasty is an acceptable choice, despite its inherent risks and complications. Prosthetic replacement is more applicable for patients with low physical demands who are older than 60 years of age with pain, stiffness, and/or instability of the elbow who will more likely be able to comply with postoperative rehabilitation and strict activity restrictions. Previous incisions, gross instability, periarticular fibrosis with ulnar nerve encasement, loss of bone and/or soft tissue, and previous infections represent obstacles for prosthetic reconstruction in these patients. The use of unlinked total elbow designs require good bone stock with little deformity and stable capsuloligamentous support, which uncommonly is found in elbows after trauma. Linked semiconstrained prostheses have been used most frequently with good short-term results reported in the literature. Reported failure rates after longer followup have led to a search for improvements in prosthetic design, cementing techniques, and better patient selection.

Arthritis↗
PubMed1996

Arthroscopy of the elbow.

As our understanding of the anatomy and function of the elbow joint continues to grow and technology continues to advance, our ability to correct disorders of the elbow with arthroscopic techniques will expand. Today, we are at the brink of major advances in the arthroscopic evaluation and treatment of elbow ailments. Many open surgical procedures currently being performed will undoubtedly be adapted for an arthroscopic approach, as we are already seeing in the treatment of radiocapitellar arthrosis, tennis elbow, arthrofibrosis, and ulnohumeral arthroplasty. Elbow procedures, such as ligamentous tightening, fracture treatment with bioabsorbable devices, and biologic joint replacement will be commonly performed in the future with the aid of the arthroscope. Although elbow arthroscopy is technically demanding, it is a highly effective surgical technique in treating many intra-articular disorders with minimal morbidity. Most of the complications associated with elbow arthroscopy can be avoided by adhering to strict and proper surgical technique. Successful elbow arthroscopy requires a thorough understanding of local gross and arthroscopic anatomy. To maintain proper orientation at all times, the skin should be properly marked before starting the procedure. The joint should be kept distended during initiation of portals to move the neurovascular structures away from the arthroscopic instruments. Nonvented cannulas with blunt trocars should be used to allow for safe passage of instruments and to avoid multiple capsular punctures. Finally, the elbow should remain flexed to 90 deg during most of the procedure, thus keeping the neurovascular structures in the antecubital fossa relaxed. If these techniques are followed, the surgical morbidity should remain low, and surgeon and patient will find elbow arthroscopy tremendously effective.

Arthroplasty↗
PubMed2002

[Fresh fractures of the radial head: results with the Judet prosthesis].

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Communitive fractures of the radial head are a therapeutic challenge when fixation is not possible. Secondary sequelae including ulnar valgus, ascension of the radius, osteoporosis of the humeral condyle and biomechanical impairment of the elbow cannot be avoided with resection or the Swanson prosthesis. The Judet prosthesis, with its floating cup, is a technically attractive solution, but the question is whether it can avoid the secondary effects observed with resection or the Swanson prosthesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have used the Judet prosthesis since August 1995 in 16 patients. These patients had Mason type IV (Johnston modification) lesions of the radial head in 14 cases and type III lesions in 2. Associated injuries included: Monteggia fracture in 2, open fracture-dislocation in 1, fracture of the radial neck associated with fracture of the lower radius in 1, and dislocation of the elbow in 2. Preoperatively, 7 of the 16 patients had an osteocartilaginous injury of the humeral condyle. The Judet prosthesis was implanted after resection in 3 patients, after osteosynthesis of the radial head in 3 others, and as the first line treatment in 10. Postoperatively, 13 of the 16 patients were given a unique 7 Gy radiation to prevent ossification as well as nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (indometazin 50 mg b.i.d.) for 3 weeks. None of the patients were immobilized. RESULTS: Mean follow-up for the 16 patients was 19 months (12-45). Deficient extension persisted in 5 patients (mean 5 degrees ). Average flexion was 128 degrees; two patients were limited to 100 degrees. Average pronation was 77 degrees, and average supination 79 degrees. Muscle force was 10% weaker than the healthy side. Sagittal and frontal stability in valgus was preserved in 14 patients. Two patients had a frontal instability with minimal valgus related to a minor insufficiency of the medial collateral ligament. According to the Radin and Riseborough classification, outcome was good in 7, fair in 6 and poor in 3. According to the Morrey classification, outcome was excellent in 2, good in 12, fair in 1 and poor in 1. Radiologically, there were no cases with ulnar valgus, humeral condyle osteoporosis, ascension of the radius, or subluxation of the distal radioulnar joint. The prosthesis loosened in one case without clinical expression. DISCUSSION: Our results with the Judet prosthesis were much better than those reported in the literature for resection and Swanson prosthesis.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Management of Mason type-III radial head fractures with a titanium prosthesis, ligament repair, and early mobilization. Surgical technique.

BACKGROUND: Radial head fractures often occur in association with other elbow fractures and soft-tissue injuries. Radial head replacement is indicated for irreparable radial head fractures associated with elbow instability. The purpose of this study was to analyze the results after treatment of such injuries with a titanium radial head prosthesis, repair of torn collateral ligaments, and early mobilization of the elbow. MATERIALS: Sixteen patients with sixteen Mason type-III radial head fractures and collateral ligament injury were treated with use of a titanium radial head prosthesis over a five-year period at the Royal Adelaide Hospital and Modbury Public Hospital in South Australia. The surgery was performed acutely in ten patients and was delayed an average of thirty-seven days (range, fifteen to seventy-nine days) in six. All patients were followed clinically and radiographically for a mean of 2.8 years (range, 1.2 to 4.3 years). RESULTS: Eight patients had an excellent result; five, a good result; and three, a fair result, according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. The three fair results occurred in patients with delayed surgery. The mean flexion contracture was 15 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 42 degrees ), with an average loss of 10 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 25 degrees ) of full flexion compared with that of the contralateral elbow. Both pronation and supination decreased an average of 12 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 45 degrees ) compared with that of the contralateral forearm. CONCLUSIONS: The results of treatment of Mason type-III radial head fractures with a monoblock titanium radial head prosthesis and soft-tissue reconstruction are satisfactory. Early mobilization of the elbow is important for the restoration of elbow range of motion and function.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1975

Immediate operative fitting of upper limb prosthesis at the time of amputation.

Three patients are described--2 with an above-elbow amputation and 1 with a through-wrist amputation--in whom a temporary prosthesis was applied on the operating table and in all of whom function was rapidly established. The patients did not become one-handed, with the result that they have all continued to wear their prosthesis throughout their working hours and use their artificial hand for all everday functions. The value of this technique in making the patient accept the prosthesis and therefore to make full use of it suggests that this procedure should be more widely applied in patients who require upper limb amputation.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations.

Patterns of use of contemporary prostheses by 135 patients with major upper extremity amputations were evaluated by questionnaire. Eighty-four percent of the patients were male and 16% were female. Amputation levels represented were below elbow, 44%; above elbow, 40%; and shoulder disarticulations or forequarter amputations, 16%. The follow-up interval averaged 12 years (range, 1-67 years). One hundred and thirteen patients were fitted with either a myoelectric or body-powered prosthesis. The overall rejection rate was 38%. Thirty-nine of 42 in the below-elbow amputation group used the prosthesis and appeared to benefit the most. Eight of 141 in the wrist disarticulation group used the prosthesis: as did 9 of 21 in the above-elbow amputation group. In contrast, all bilateral amputees used their prostheses. Stiff shoulders and brachial plexus injury were both predictors for poor prosthetic usage.

Amputees↗
PubMed2002

[Differential therapy of radial head fracture: a critical analysis based on outcome of 53 patients].

We investigated 53 patients with 57 radial head fractures (4 patients with bilateral fractures) treated between 1993 and 1998. We focused on patients with radial head fractures asking about (1) the relation between fracture type and therapy and (2) the correlation between chosen treatment and result. We saw the following fractures: Mason I: 3 cases, Mason II: 26 cases, Mason III: 11 cases, and Mason IV: 15 cases. Good results were achieved by 30 patients with 31 fractures, fair results by 8 patients with 9 fractures, and poor results by 13 patients with 14 fractures. Patients with a Mason I fracture achieved good results with functional therapy. Of the 26 Mason II fractures, 14 were treated with screws, 14% of whom had poor results subjectively. Six patients were treated with a K wire, titanium nail, or prevot nail, none of whom had poor results. Of 11 patients with a Mason III fracture, 10 were treated by resection of the radial head, and in 1 patient we implanted a prosthesis due to an intraoperatively detected elbow instability after resection and achieved good postoperative results. Only one patient (9%) had poor long-term results subjectively. Of 15 patients with a Mason IV fracture, 11 were treated by resection of the radial head: 5 patients (33%) had poor long-term results, only 3 of whom (20%) subjectively considered the results poor.

Adolescent↗